硝化・ウレアーゼ阻害剤の世界市場分析と2032年までの予測： 製品タイプ別、養分タイプ別、作物タイプ別、適用方法別、流通チャネル別、エンドユーザー別、地域別

Stratistics MRCによると、硝化・ウレアーゼ阻害剤の世界市場は2025年に33億6,000万米ドルを占め、予測期間中にCAGR 7.3％で成長し、2032年には55億1,000万米ドルに達する見込みです。

硝化・ウレアーゼ阻害剤は、土壌中の窒素変換を遅らせることで窒素利用効率を高めるために農業で使用される化学化合物です。硝化阻害剤はアンモニウムから硝酸への変換を遅らせ、溶出と亜酸化窒素の排出を削減します。ウレアーゼ阻害剤は、尿素のアンモニアへの急速な加水分解を防ぎ、揮発による窒素損失を最小限に抑えます。これらの阻害剤は、肥料の効果を高め、環境への影響を最小限に抑えることで、持続可能な農業を支援します。

米国農務省によると、2022年、カナダの小麦生産量は3％増加すると予測されています。

持続可能な農業への需要の高まり

硝化・ウレアーゼ阻害剤は、肥料による窒素損失を最小限に抑え、土壌の健全性を向上させ、環境汚染を減らすという重要な役割を果たしています。農家は、温室効果ガスの排出を抑制しながら窒素の利用効率を高めるツールとして、これらの阻害剤を採用しています。食糧需要の増大と耕地面積の減少に伴い、長期的な生産性を維持するためには持続可能性が不可欠となっています。これらの抑制剤はまた、硝酸塩の溶出とアンモニアの揮散を削減するよう求める規制圧力の高まりにも合致しています。持続可能な農業が勢いを増すにつれて、市場の需要は大幅に急増すると予想されます。

限られた認識と採用

多くの農家は、こうした技術やその利点、適用方法について十分な知識を有していないです。誤った情報、改良普及サービスへのアクセスの制限、近代的農法への接触機会の少なさなどが、受け入れの妨げとなっています。零細農家は、長期的な土壌の健全性や窒素効率よりも、目先の収量を優先することが多く、プレミアム添加剤の採用に抵抗を示します。さらに、言葉の壁、政府への働きかけの不十分さ、的を絞った教育プログラムの欠如が、問題をさらに悪化させています。このような知識のギャップは、市場への浸透を低下させ、持続可能な肥料管理ソリューションの普及を遅らせる。

スマート灌漑システムとの統合

スマートシステムは、養分放出のタイミングを決め、無駄を減らし、肥料散布と作物のニーズを同期させることができます。これらの技術を抑制剤と組み合わせることで、窒素の保持が強化され、植物の吸収効率が高まる。先進的なセンサー技術により、土壌窒素の状態をリアルタイムでモニタリングすることができるため、場所に応じた抑制剤の散布が可能になります。これにより、環境への影響を最小限に抑えながら、資源の利用と収量を最適化することができます。気候変動に強い農業が優先される中、この技術主導の相乗効果は、養分管理を一変させる態勢を整えています。

変動する肥料価格

世界のエネルギー価格、原料不足、地政学的緊張による窒素ベースの肥料コストの変動は、農家の購入決定に影響を与えます。肥料価格が高騰すると、農家は抑制剤のような添加剤を含め、投入資材全体の使用量を減らす可能性があります。逆に、肥料価格が低い時期には、効率を高める製品の必要性が低下します。このような価格の不安定さは不確実性を生み、高度な養分管理ソリューションへの長期的な投資を抑制します。さらに、新興国の価格に敏感な市場は特に脆弱で、世界の農業セクター全体における阻害剤の安定した需要と成長の可能性を制限しています。

COVID-19の影響：

COVID-19の大流行は世界の農業サプライチェーンを混乱させ、肥料と阻害剤の生産と流通を遅らせた。労働力不足と操業停止は圃場試験に影響を及ぼし、規制当局の承認も遅らせた。しかし、この危機は回復力のある農業への関心を強め、持続可能な農業慣行の重要性を浮き彫りにしました。硝化・ウレアーゼ阻害剤は、資源の制約下で収量を最適化するためのツールとして普及しました。パンデミック後の復興では、土壌の健全性と投入効率への関心が高まり、阻害剤の採用に恩恵をもたらしました。

予測期間中、硝化阻害剤セグメントが最大となる見込み

持続可能な農業と窒素利用効率の向上に対する需要の高まりにより、硝化抑制剤セグメントは予測期間中最大の市場シェアを占めると予想されます。これらの製品は、硝酸塩の溶出や亜酸化窒素の排出を削減し、環境規制や気候目標に合致させるのに役立ちます。肥料コストの上昇と作物収量を最大化する必要性が、この製品の採用をさらに後押ししています。政府の支援政策や、土壌の健全性と養分管理に関する農家の意識の高まりも、市場の成長を後押ししています。

葉面散布分野は予測期間中最も高いCAGRが見込まれる

予測期間中、葉面散布分野は最も高い成長率を示すと予測されます。その理由は、成長が早く栄養集約的な作物に対する簡便性と有効性です。葉面散布は、重要な成長段階において正確な養分供給を可能にし、養分は葉から素早く吸収されます。改良された製剤は葉への付着性を高め、暑い気候での損失を最小限に抑えます。特に高価な園芸作物では、この方法の適応性と効率の高さが、葉面散布型抑制剤の使用拡大を促進する主な要因となっています。

最もシェアが高い地域：

予測期間中、アジア太平洋地域が最大の市場シェアを占めると予想されるが、これは食糧生産への要求が高まっていることと、効率的な肥料使用に対する政策的支援によるものです。インドや中国などの諸国は、窒素の損失を抑制し農業生産を高めるために、環境に優しい農法を優先しています。土壌侵食や水質汚染といった環境問題に対する意識の高まりが、抑制剤の魅力を高めています。農業技術における革新と地域の強力な研究努力が、この地域全体の市場成長を後押ししています。

CAGRが最も高い地域：

予測期間中、北米地域が最も高いCAGRを示すと予測されます。これは、環境規制の高まり、高度な精密農業の実践、強力な調査イニシアティブが原動力となっています。農家は、窒素損失を削減し、肥料効率を向上させ、持続可能性基準を遵守するために阻害剤を採用しています。政府の優遇措置やアグリテック企業と研究機関の連携が成長をさらに後押ししています。土壌の健全性と水質保全に対する意識の高まりも需要を後押しし、この地域は持続可能な栄養管理のリーダーとしての地位を確立しています。

無料のカスタマイズサービス：

本レポートをご購読のお客様には、以下の無料カスタマイズオプションのいずれかをご利用いただけます：

• 企業プロファイル
  • 追加市場企業の包括的プロファイリング（3社まで）
  • 主要企業のSWOT分析（3社まで）
• 地域セグメンテーション
  • 顧客の関心に応じた主要国の市場推計・予測・CAGR（注：フィージビリティチェックによる）
• 競合ベンチマーキング
  • 製品ポートフォリオ、地理的プレゼンス、戦略的提携に基づく主要企業のベンチマーキング

目次

第1章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第2章 序文

• 概要
• ステークホルダー
• 調査範囲
• 調査手法
  • データマイニング
  • データ分析
  • データ検証
  • 調査アプローチ
• 調査資料
  • 1次調査資料
  • 2次調査情報源
  • 前提条件

第3章 市場動向分析

• 促進要因
• 抑制要因
• 機会
• 脅威
• 製品分析
• エンドユーザー分析
• 新興市場
• COVID-19の影響

第4章 ポーターのファイブフォース分析

• 供給企業の交渉力
• 買い手の交渉力
• 代替品の脅威
• 新規参入業者の脅威
• 競争企業間の敵対関係

第5章 世界の硝化・ウレアーゼ阻害剤市場：製品タイプ別

• 硝化阻害剤
  • ジシアンジアミド（DCD）
  • ニトラピリン
  • DMPP（3,4-ジメチルピラゾールリン酸）
• ウレアーゼ阻害剤（UI）
  • N-（n-ブチル）チオリン酸トリアミド
  • フェニルホスホロジアミデート（PPD/PPDA）
  • N-（2-ニトロフェニル）リン酸トリアミド（NPPT）
  • ハイドロキノン
• その他の製品タイプ

第6章 世界の硝化・ウレアーゼ阻害剤市場：養分タイプ別

• 窒素
• アンモニア
• 硝酸塩
• 尿素
• その他の養分タイプ

第7章 世界の硝化・ウレアーゼ阻害剤市場：作物タイプ別

• 穀物
  • トウモロコシ
  • 小麦
  • 米
• 油糧種子と豆類
  • 大豆
  • キャノーラ
• 果物と野菜
• その他の作物タイプ

第8章 世界の硝化・ウレアーゼ阻害剤市場：用途別

• 施肥灌水
• 葉面散布
• 土壌への施用
• コーティング/粒状塗布
• その他用途

第9章 世界の硝化・ウレアーゼ阻害剤市場：流通チャネル別

• オンライン小売
• オフライン小売

第10章 世界の硝化・ウレアーゼ阻害剤市場：エンドユーザー別

• 農業部門
  • 農民
  • 農業関連企業
• 非農業部門
  • ゴルフコースと芝生管理
  • 園芸
  • 造園
• その他のエンドユーザー

第11章 世界の硝化・ウレアーゼ阻害剤市場：地域別

• 北米
  • 米国
  • カナダ
  • メキシコ
• 欧州
  • ドイツ
  • 英国
  • イタリア
  • フランス
  • スペイン
  • その他欧州
• アジア太平洋
  • 日本
  • 中国
  • インド
  • オーストラリア
  • ニュージーランド
  • 韓国
  • その他アジア太平洋
• 南米
  • アルゼンチン
  • ブラジル
  • チリ
  • その他南米
• 中東・アフリカ
  • サウジアラビア
  • アラブ首長国連邦
  • カタール
  • 南アフリカ
  • その他中東・アフリカ

第12章 主な発展

• 契約、パートナーシップ、コラボレーション、ジョイントベンチャー
• 買収と合併
• 新製品発売
• 事業拡大
• その他の主要戦略

第13章 企業プロファイリング

• BASF SE
• The Dow Chemical Company
• Solvay S.A
• Soilgenic Technologies LLC
• SKW Piesteritz GmbH
• SABIC Global Technologies BV
• Rhodia Operations SASU
• Nico Orgo Manures
• National Fertilizers Limited
• Koch Agronomic Services LLC
• IFFCO
• Evonik Industries
• EuroChem Agro GmbH
• DowDuPont
• Corteva Agriscience
• Compo Expert GmbH
• Ballance Agri-Nutrients Ltd.
• RainAg

List of Tables

• Table 1 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Region (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 2 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Product Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 3 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Nitrification Inhibitors (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 4 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Dicyandiamide (DCD) (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 5 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Nitrapyrin (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 6 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By DMPP (3,4-Dimethylpyrazole Phosphate) (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 7 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Urease Inhibitors (UIs) (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 8 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By N-(n-Butyl) Thiophosphoric Triamide (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 9 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Phenylphosphorodiamidate (PPD/PPDA) (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 10 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By N-(2-Nitrophenyl) Phosphoric Triamide (NPPT) (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 11 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Hydroquinone (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 12 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Other Product Types (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 13 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Nutrient Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 14 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Nitrogen (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 15 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Ammonia (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 16 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Nitrate (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 17 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Urea (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 18 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Other Nutrient Types (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 19 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Crop Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 20 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Cereals & Grains (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 21 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Corn (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 22 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Wheat (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 23 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Rice (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 24 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Oilseeds & Pulses (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 25 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Soybean (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 26 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Canola (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 27 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Fruits & Vegetables (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 28 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Other Crop Types (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 29 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Application Method (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 30 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Fertigation (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 31 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Foliar (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 32 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Soil Application (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 33 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Coating/Granular Application (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 34 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Other Application Methods (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 35 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Distribution Channel (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 36 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Online Retail (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 37 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Offline Retail (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 38 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By End User (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 39 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Agricultural Sector (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 40 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Farmers (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 41 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Agribusiness Companies (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 42 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Non-Agricultural Sector (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 43 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Golf Courses & Turf Management (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 44 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Horticulture (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 45 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Landscaping (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 46 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Other End Users (2024-2032) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market is accounted for $3.36 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $5.51 billion by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 7.3% during the forecast period. Nitrification and urease inhibitors are chemical compounds used in agriculture to enhance nitrogen use efficiency by slowing down nitrogen transformations in soil. Nitrification inhibitors delay the conversion of ammonium to nitrate, reducing leaching and nitrous oxide emissions. Urease inhibitors prevent the rapid hydrolysis of urea into ammonia, minimizing nitrogen losses through volatilization. These inhibitors support sustainable farming by improving fertilizer effectiveness and minimizing environmental impact.

According to the United States Department of Agriculture, in 2022, wheat production in Canada is projected to grow by 3%.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Rising demand for sustainable agriculture

Nitrification and urease inhibitors play a vital role by minimizing nitrogen losses from fertilizers, improving soil health, and reducing environmental pollution. Farmers are embracing these inhibitors as tools to enhance nitrogen use efficiency while curbing greenhouse gas emissions. With rising food demand and decreasing arable land, sustainability has become essential for long-term productivity. These inhibitors also align with growing regulatory pressures to reduce nitrate leaching and ammonia volatilization. As sustainable agriculture gains momentum, their market demand is expected to surge significantly.

Restraint:

Limited awareness and adoption

Many farmers lack adequate knowledge about these technologies, their benefits, and application methods. Misinformation, limited access to extension services, and low exposure to modern agricultural practices hinder acceptance. Smallholder farmers often prioritize immediate yield returns over long-term soil health or nitrogen efficiency, leading to resistance toward adopting premium additives. Moreover, language barriers, insufficient government outreach, and lack of targeted educational programs further exacerbate the problem. This knowledge gap reduces market penetration and delays the widespread adoption of sustainable fertilizer management solutions.

Opportunity:

Integration with smart irrigation systems

Smart systems enable timed nutrient release, reducing wastage and synchronizing fertilizer applications with crop needs. Coupling these technologies with inhibitors amplifies nitrogen retention and boosts plant uptake efficiency. Advanced sensor technologies allow real-time monitoring of soil nitrogen status, enabling site-specific application of inhibitors. This minimizes environmental impact while optimizing resource use and yields. As climate-resilient farming becomes a priority, this tech-driven synergy is poised to transform nutrient management.

Threat:

Volatile fertilizer prices

Fluctuations in the cost of nitrogen-based fertilizers driven by global energy prices, raw material shortages, and geopolitical tensions affect farmers' purchasing decisions. When fertilizer prices rise sharply, farmers may reduce overall input usage, including additives like inhibitors. Conversely, during periods of low fertilizer prices, the perceived need for efficiency-enhancing products diminishes. This price instability creates uncertainty, discouraging long-term investment in advanced nutrient management solutions. Additionally, price-sensitive markets in developing countries are especially vulnerable, limiting the consistent demand and growth potential of inhibitors across global agricultural sectors.

Covid-19 Impact:

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted global agricultural supply chains, delaying production and distribution of fertilizers and inhibitors. Labor shortages and lockdowns affected field trials and slowed regulatory approvals. However, the crisis intensified focus on resilient farming and highlighted the importance of sustainable practices. Nitrification and urease inhibitors gained traction as tools to optimize yields under resource constraints. Post-pandemic recovery saw increased interest in soil health and input efficiency, benefiting inhibitor adoption.

The nitrification inhibitors segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The nitrification inhibitors segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period, due to the rising demand for sustainable agriculture and enhanced nitrogen use efficiency. These products help reduce nitrate leaching and nitrous oxide emissions, aligning with environmental regulations and climate goals. Increasing fertilizer costs and the need to maximize crop yields further boost their adoption. Supportive government policies and growing awareness among farmers about soil health and nutrient management also propel market growth.

The foliar application segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Over the forecast period, the foliar application segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate, owing to its simplicity and effectiveness for fast-growing, nutrient-intensive crops. It enables precise nutrient delivery during vital growth phases, with nutrients quickly absorbed through the leaves. Improved formulations enhance adherence to foliage and minimize losses in hot climates. This method's adaptability and higher efficiency, particularly in high-value horticultural crops, serve as major factors driving the growing use of foliar-applied inhibitors.

Region with largest share:

During the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is expected to hold the largest market share, fuelled by escalating food production requirements and policy-driven support for efficient fertilizer use. Nations such as India and China are prioritizing eco-friendly farming practices to curb nitrogen loss and enhance agricultural output. Growing awareness of environmental issues like soil erosion and water contamination is increasing the appeal of inhibitors. Innovations in agri-tech and strong local research efforts are propelling the market's growth across the region.

Region with highest CAGR:

Over the forecast period, the North America region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR, driven by rising environmental regulations, advanced precision farming practices, and strong research initiatives. Farmers are adopting inhibitors to reduce nitrogen loss, improve fertilizer efficiency, and comply with sustainability standards. Government incentives and collaborations between agritech firms and research institutions further support growth. Increasing awareness of soil health and water conservation also fuels demand, positioning the region as a leader in sustainable nutrient management.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players in Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market include BASF SE, The Dow Chemical Company, Solvay S.A, Soilgenic Technologies LLC, SKW Piesteritz GmbH, SABIC Global Technologies BV, Rhodia Operations SASU, Nico Orgo Manures, National Fertilizers Limited, Koch Agronomic Services LLC, IFFCO, Evonik Industries, EuroChem Agro GmbH, DowDuPont, Corteva Agriscience, Compo Expert GmbH, Ballance Agri-Nutrients Ltd., and RainAg.

Key Developments:

In July 2025, BASF and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. have signed a framework agreement for cathode active materials. Under the agreement, BASF will cooperate with CATL on a global scale. CATL has selected BASF as its important supplier. BASF will support CATL's global layout through its global production network.

In June 2025, Dow announces significant milestones to mark breakthrough innovation with INNATE(TM) TF 220 Resin to help enable the design for recyclability and high-performance BOPE films for flexible packaging. From material design to end-of-life solutions, Dow is collaborating with stakeholders across the packaging chain to create impactful, scalable solutions to today's sustainability challenges - transforming vision into commercial reality.

In April 2022, Koch Agronomic Services, LLC is excited to announce an agreement to collaborate with SVG Ventures|THRIVE, leveraging its Venture & Innovation Platform.This relationship aligns with Koch's focused efforts to expand its portfolio for growers around the globe to improve nutrient efficiency, utilization and uptake.

Product Types Covered:

• Nitrification Inhibitors
• Urease Inhibitors (UIs)
• Other Product Types

Nutrient Types Covered:

• Nitrogen
• Ammonia
• Nitrate
• Urea
• Other Nutrient Types

Crop Types Covered:

• Cereals & Grains
• Oilseeds & Pulses
• Fruits & Vegetables
• Other Crop Types

Application Methods Covered:

• Fertigation
• Foliar
• Soil Application
• Coating/Granular Application
• Other Application Methods

Distribution Channels Covered:

• Online Retail
• Offline Retail

End Users Covered:

• Agricultural Sector
• Non-Agricultural Sector
• Other End Users

Regions Covered:

• North America
  • US
  • Canada
  • Mexico
• Europe
  • Germany
  • UK
  • Italy
  • France
  • Spain
  • Rest of Europe
• Asia Pacific
  • Japan
  • China
  • India
  • Australia
  • New Zealand
  • South Korea
  • Rest of Asia Pacific
• South America
  • Argentina
  • Brazil
  • Chile
  • Rest of South America
• Middle East & Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE
  • Qatar
  • South Africa
  • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

• Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
• Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
• Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
• Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
• Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
• Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
• Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
• Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

• Company Profiling
  • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
  • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
• Regional Segmentation
  • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
• Competitive Benchmarking
  • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

• 2.1 Abstract
• 2.2 Stake Holders
• 2.3 Research Scope
• 2.4 Research Methodology
  • 2.4.1 Data Mining
  • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
  • 2.4.3 Data Validation
  • 2.4.4 Research Approach
• 2.5 Research Sources
  • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
  • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
  • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

• 3.1 Introduction
• 3.2 Drivers
• 3.3 Restraints
• 3.4 Opportunities
• 3.5 Threats
• 3.6 Product Analysis
• 3.7 End User Analysis
• 3.8 Emerging Markets
• 3.9 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

• 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
• 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
• 4.3 Threat of substitutes
• 4.4 Threat of new entrants
• 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market, By Product Type

• 5.1 Introduction
• 5.2 Nitrification Inhibitors
  • 5.2.1 Dicyandiamide (DCD)
  • 5.2.2 Nitrapyrin
  • 5.2.3 DMPP (3,4-Dimethylpyrazole Phosphate)
• 5.3 Urease Inhibitors (UIs)
  • 5.3.1 N-(n-Butyl) Thiophosphoric Triamide
  • 5.3.2 Phenylphosphorodiamidate (PPD/PPDA)
  • 5.3.3 N-(2-Nitrophenyl) Phosphoric Triamide (NPPT)
  • 5.3.4 Hydroquinone
• 5.4 Other Product Types

6 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market, By Nutrient Type

• 6.1 Introduction
• 6.2 Nitrogen
• 6.3 Ammonia
• 6.4 Nitrate
• 6.5 Urea
• 6.6 Other Nutrient Types

7 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market, By Crop Type

• 7.1 Introduction
• 7.2 Cereals & Grains
  • 7.2.1 Corn
  • 7.2.2 Wheat
  • 7.2.3 Rice
• 7.3 Oilseeds & Pulses
  • 7.3.1 Soybean
  • 7.3.2 Canola
• 7.4 Fruits & Vegetables
• 7.5 Other Crop Types

8 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market, By Application Method

• 8.1 Introduction
• 8.2 Fertigation
• 8.3 Foliar
• 8.4 Soil Application
• 8.5 Coating/Granular Application
• 8.6 Other Application Methods

9 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market, By Distribution Channel

• 9.1 Introduction
• 9.2 Online Retail
• 9.3 Offline Retail

10 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market, By End User

• 10.1 Introduction
• 10.2 Agricultural Sector
  • 10.2.1 Farmers
  • 10.2.2 Agribusiness Companies
• 10.3 Non-Agricultural Sector
  • 10.3.1 Golf Courses & Turf Management
  • 10.3.2 Horticulture
  • 10.3.3 Landscaping
• 10.4 Other End Users

11 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market, By Geography

• 11.1 Introduction
• 11.2 North America
  • 11.2.1 US
  • 11.2.2 Canada
  • 11.2.3 Mexico
• 11.3 Europe
  • 11.3.1 Germany
  • 11.3.2 UK
  • 11.3.3 Italy
  • 11.3.4 France
  • 11.3.5 Spain
  • 11.3.6 Rest of Europe
• 11.4 Asia Pacific
  • 11.4.1 Japan
  • 11.4.2 China
  • 11.4.3 India
  • 11.4.4 Australia
  • 11.4.5 New Zealand
  • 11.4.6 South Korea
  • 11.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
• 11.5 South America
  • 11.5.1 Argentina
  • 11.5.2 Brazil
  • 11.5.3 Chile
  • 11.5.4 Rest of South America
• 11.6 Middle East & Africa
  • 11.6.1 Saudi Arabia
  • 11.6.2 UAE
  • 11.6.3 Qatar
  • 11.6.4 South Africa
  • 11.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

12 Key Developments

• 12.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
• 12.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
• 12.3 New Product Launch
• 12.4 Expansions
• 12.5 Other Key Strategies

13 Company Profiling

• 13.1 BASF SE
• 13.2 The Dow Chemical Company
• 13.3 Solvay S.A
• 13.4 Soilgenic Technologies LLC
• 13.5 SKW Piesteritz GmbH
• 13.6 SABIC Global Technologies BV
• 13.7 Rhodia Operations SASU
• 13.8 Nico Orgo Manures
• 13.9 National Fertilizers Limited
• 13.10 Koch Agronomic Services LLC
• 13.11 IFFCO
• 13.12 Evonik Industries
• 13.13 EuroChem Agro GmbH
• 13.14 DowDuPont
• 13.15 Corteva Agriscience
• 13.16 Compo Expert GmbH
• 13.17 Ballance Agri-Nutrients Ltd.
• 13.18 RainAg