サンプル依頼リスト カート
  • English
  • Traditional Chinese
  • Simplified Chinese
デフォルト表紙
市場調査レポート
商品コード
1423445

農業におけるブロックチェーンの世界市場-2023年～2030年

Global Blockchain in Agriculture Market - 2023-2030

出版日
ページ情報
英文 186 Pages
納期
即日から翌営業日
カスタマイズ可能
適宜更新あり
価格
価格表記: USDを日本円(税抜)に換算
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=144.06円
農業におけるブロックチェーンの世界市場-2023年～2030年
出版日: 2024年02月09日
発行: DataM Intelligence
ページ情報: 英文 186 Pages
納期: 即日から翌営業日
GIIご利用のメリット
  • 全表示
  • 概要
  • 目次
概要

概要

農業におけるブロックチェーンの世界市場は、2022年に1億5,812万米ドルに達し、2030年には2億5,410万米ドルに達すると予測され、予測期間2023-2030年のCAGRは6.2%で成長する見込みです。

農業におけるブロックチェーンの世界市場は、植物、種子の品質、作物の成長に関する情報を提供できるブロックチェーン技術が生産量を増加させたため、ここ数年で大きな成長と変貌を遂げています。また、種子から消費者までのサプライチェーンに関する情報を提供することもできます。したがって、そのような要因は、農業におけるブロックチェーンの世界の推進に役立ちます。

さらにブロックチェーンは、オーガニック製品やフェアトレード製品など、価値の高い作物の真正性や出所の確認にも役立ちます。これによって消費者の信頼を築き、不正な請求を防ぐことができます。追跡とトレーサビリティの技術は、食品の安全性を簡単に確認するのに役立ち、農業におけるブロックチェーンの採用拡大につながる可能性があります。

さらに、多くの製造企業がこのブロックチェーン技術を利用して、消費者に高品質な製品と透明性の高い情報を提供しています。例えば、*2020年4月、IBMとネスレはパートナーシップを結び、ネスレがIBMフードトラスト・エンタープライズ・ブロックチェーンを使用して、同社のZoegasコーヒーブランドをトレースすることを可能にしました。このコーヒーは、消費者がコーヒー豆の原産地をトレースできるよう、QRコードスキャナ付きとなります。IBM food trust enterprise blockchainは、農家、収穫時期、特定出荷の取引証明書、焙煎期間に関するデータを記録します。

ダイナミクス

スマート農業に対する需要の増加

消費者が自分の食品がどこから来て、どのように生産されたかを知りたがる傾向が強まる中、植え付けから収穫、加工、包装、流通に至るまで、製品の旅の各段階に関する情報を記録できることから、農業におけるブロックチェーンの需要が高まっています。これにより、汚染や品質問題が発生した場合に迅速かつ正確なトレーサビリティが可能になり、食品の安全性を確保し、規制要件を満たすために不可欠となります。

さらに、多くの主要企業は、顧客に正確な情報を提供するため、革新的な技術の開発に注力しています。例えば、2020年7月、J.M.Smucker Companyブランドは、100％コロンビアコーヒーのパッケージ製品である850（R）Coffeeを通じて、Farmer Connectと協力し、コーヒーのサプライチェーンにおけるトレーサビリティ、効率性、公平性を向上させるために作成されたプラットフォーム上でIBMのブロックチェーン技術を使用して、顧客がコーヒーの原産地を追跡できるようになった。

サプライチェーンの透明性に対する需要の高まり

消費者が購入する製品の原産地、生産方法、倫理的配慮についてより強く意識するようになったため、サプライチェーンにおける透明性への需要が高まっています。ブロックチェーンは製品の品質についてより透明で正確な情報を提供し、また食品汚染物質の容易な特定に役立ち、食品の安全性を高めるのに役立つため、農業におけるブロックチェーンの需要が高まっています。したがって、このような要因がブロックチェーン技術の採用増加につながります。

さらに、多くの国の政府が、消費者がブロックチェーンを利用できるようにするためのイニシアチブを取っています。例えば、2023年6月、タミル・ナードゥ州の情報技術・デジタルサービス担当大臣は、電子行政のための州訓練センターを発足させ、Nambikkai Inaiyam（NI）を立ち上げました。このブロックチェーンは、市民を中心とした透明で効率的かつ安全な組織間ワークフローを構築するために、資格のある当事者によって使用されます。エンタープライズグレードのG2GとG2Cの製品とサービスは、このインフラを使って実装されます。また、NIプラットフォームは、政府省庁や公共部門の組織、機関、企業に対するBAAS（Blockchain As A Service）プロバイダーとしても機能します。このような取り組みは、普及率の向上に役立つと思われます。

消費者の認識不足

消費者や利害関係者の認識不足は、新しい技術を採用することへの抵抗につながる可能性があります。これは、業界の変革とブロックチェーンがもたらす潜在的なメリットの実現を遅らせる可能性があります。ブロックチェーン技術の研究開発のための資金が減少する可能性があります。したがって、市場の成長低下につながる可能性があります。

さらに、ブロックチェーン技術に関する認知度が低いため、多くのメーカーは政府の制度すら知らないです。例えば、2021年12月、インド政府の電子情報技術省はブロックチェーンに関する国家スキームを立ち上げました。国家ブロックチェーンフレームワークは、農業サプライチェーン、電子カルテ、教育証明書チェーン、医薬品サプライチェーンなど、さまざまな分野におけるブロックチェーンアプリケーションの開発と大規模なホスティングに使用されます。このインフラは、Blockchain-as-a-Serviceの提供に利用されます。

目次

第1章 調査手法と調査範囲

第2章 定義と概要

第3章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第4章 市場力学

  • 影響要因
    • 促進要因
      • スマート農業への需要の高まり
      • サプライチェーンの透明性に対する需要の高まり
    • 抑制要因
      • 消費者の認識不足
    • 機会
    • 影響分析

第5章 産業分析

  • ポーターのファイブフォース分析
  • サプライチェーン分析
  • 価格分析
  • 規制分析

第6章 COVID-19分析

第7章 タイプ別

  • 公的機関
  • 民間
  • ハイブリッド／コンソーシアム

第8章 利害関係者別

  • 生産者
  • 食品製造・加工業者
  • 小売業者
  • その他

第9章 プロバイダー別

  • アプリケーションとソリューション
  • ミドルウェア・インフラ
  • プロトコルプロバイダー
  • その他

第10章 組織規模別

  • 中小企業
  • 大企業

第11章 流通チャネル別

  • 直営店
  • eコマース
  • その他

第12章 用途別

  • 商品のトレーサビリティ、追跡、可視化
  • 決済
  • スマートコントラクト

第13章 地域別

  • 北米
    • 米国
    • カナダ
    • メキシコ
  • 欧州
    • ドイツ
    • 英国
    • フランス
    • イタリア
    • ロシア
    • その他欧州
  • 南米
    • ブラジル
    • アルゼンチン
    • その他南米
  • アジア太平洋
    • 中国
    • インド
    • 日本
    • オーストラリア
    • その他アジア太平洋地域
  • 中東・アフリカ

第14章 競合情勢

  • 競合シナリオ
  • 市況/シェア分析
  • M&A分析

第15章 企業プロファイル

  • IBM corporation
    • 会社概要
    • 製品ポートフォリオと説明
    • 財務概要
    • 主な発展
  • TE-FOOD International GmbH.
  • Arc-Net
  • iTrust
  • SAP SA
  • Origintrail
  • Ripe Technology, Inc
  • GrainChain, Inc
  • Bitfury Group Limited
  • Amazon Web Services

第16章 付録

目次
Product Code: AG7857

Overview

Global Blockchain in Agriculture Market reached US$ 158.12 million in 2022 and is expected to reach US$ 254.10 million by 2030, growing with a CAGR of 6.2% during the forecast period 2023-2030.

The global blockchain in the agriculture market has witnessed significant growth and transformations over the years, as blockchain technology has increased in production as can provide information about plants, seed quality, and crop growth. Also, it can even provide information about the supply chain, from seed to consumer. Hence, such factors can help in driving the global blockchain in agriculture.

Furthermore, blockchain can help in verifying the authenticity and provenance of high-value crops, such as organic or fair-trade products. This builds consumer trust and prevents fraudulent claims. The tracking and traceability technology can help in the easy identification of food safety, it can lead to an increase in the adoption of blockchain in agriculture.

Additionally, many manufacturing companies are using this blockchain technology to provide consumers with high-quality products and transparent information. For instance, * In April 2020, IBM and Nestle had a partnership that enables nestle to use the IBM food trust enterprise blockchain to trace its Zoegas coffee brand. This coffee would come in a QR code scanner to help the consumers trace coffee beans for their origin. The IBM food trust enterprise blockchain will record the data about the farmers, time of harvest, transaction certificate for specific shipments as well as roasting period.

Dynamics

Increase in Demand for Smart Agriculture Practices

As consumers are interested in knowing where their food comes from and how it's produced is increasing, the demand for blockchain in agriculture is raising, as it provides information about each stage of a product's journey can be recorded, from planting to harvesting, processing, packaging, and distribution. This enables quick and accurate traceability in case of contamination or quality issues, which is essential for ensuring food safety and meeting regulatory requirements.

Furthermore, many key players are focusing to produce innovative technologies in order to provide customers with precise information. For instance, in July 2020, J. M. Smucker Company brand through its 100% Colombian Coffee packaged product, 850® Coffee collaborating with Farmer Connect, now Customers can now track their coffee's origin using IBM's blockchain technology on a platform created to improve traceability, efficiency, and fairness in the coffee supply chain.

The Rise in Demand for Supply Chain Transparency

The demand for transparency in the supply chain is increasing as consumers are more conscious about the origin, production methods, and ethical considerations of the products they purchase, which increases the demand for blockchain in agriculture as it provides more transparent and accurate information about the quality of the product and also helps in easy identification of food contaminants and helps in increasing the food safety. Hence, such factors lead to an increase in the adoption of blockchain technology.

Furthermore, many country governments are taking initiatives to increase the availability of blockchain to consumers. For instance, in June 2023, the Minister for Information Technology and Digital Services of Tamil Nadu inaugurated the State Training Centre for e-Governance and launched Nambikkai Inaiyam (NI). This blockchain will be used by qualifying parties to build transparent, efficient and secure citizen-centric and inter-organizational workflows. Enterprise-grade G2G and G2C products and services will be implemented using this infrastructure. The NI platform will also function as a Blockchain As A Service (BAAS) provider to Government departments and Public sector organizations, agencies and companies. Such initiatives can help in increasing the adoption rate.

Lack of awareness among the Consumers

The lack of awareness among consumers, and stakeholders can lead to resistance to adopting new technologies This could delay the transformation of the industry and the realization of the potential benefits that blockchain. This could lead to decrease funding for research and development of blockchain technologies. Hence, it could lead to declination in market growth.

Furthermore, due to less awareness about blockchain technologies, many manufacturers are not even aware of government schemes. For instance, in December 2021, the Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology Government of India launched a National Scheme on Blockchain. National Blockchain Framework would be used for the development and large-scale hosting of Blockchain applications in different areas such as agriculture supply chain, electronic health records, education certificate chain, drug supply chain, etc. This infrastructure will be used for providing Blockchain-as-a-Service.

Segment Analysis

The global blockchain in the agriculture market is segmented based on type, stakeholders, providers, organization size, distribution channel, application and region.

Raising in Demand for Effective Blockchain Management

Product traceability, visibility, and tracking segment hold the largest share in the global blockchain in agriculture, as the blockchain can provide traceable tamper-proof information about the product in every step of the supply chain, it also helps in reducing food safety issues as it can helps in quick identification of problems. This also provides all stakeholders with up-to-date visibility into the status and location of products, improving coordination and decision-making.

Furthermore, many manufacturing companies are producing innovative products in order to attract a larger consumer basis. For instance, J.M Smucker uses the IBM blockchain to trace coffee beans of the 1850 Brand. Smucker will use a blockchain to trace Colombian coffee beans while letting consumers make donations to coffee farmers in Colombia. Such products can help increase adoption of blockchain.

Geographical Penetration

Increase in Research and development and Presence of vast agricultural land

North America has been a dominant force in the global blockchain in the agriculture market and its significance has only grown in the post-2020 era. The demand for blockchain technology is raising in this region as consumers in this region are demanding efficient information regarding the origin, food processing, and distribution, which leads to an increase in the adoption rate for blockchain in this region.

Furthermore, the market in this region is majorly driving as the key players' companies are producing a wide variety of products and increasing research and development of blockchain technologies in this region due to the larger consumer base is helping in increasing the global blockchain in the agriculture market.

Additionally, the presence of vast agricultural land can help increase in the adoption of blockchain in agriculture as it can provide exact information about the plants, seed quality, crop growth, and information on the tracking of seeds from farms to consumers. For instance, according to the US Department of Agriculture report of 20221, the United States has approximately 911 million acres of agricultural land.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the market include IBM Corporation, TE-FOOD International GmbH, Arc-Net, iTrust, SAP SA, Origintrail, Ripe Technology, Inc, Grain Chain, Inc, Bitfury Group Limited and Amazon Web Services.

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

The pandemic had brought a positive impact on the global blockchain in the agriculture market. During the pandemic, people become more conscious about food safety, and processing, which has raised the demand for precision tracking and traceability of products. But due to government lockdown restrictions, the distribution chain has been disrupted.

Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis

The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine has brought a disruption in countries' economies many manufacturing companies are had been shut down due to less employment ratio, exports and imports rate, which had shown a negative impact on the adoption rate and distribution channel.

By Type

  • Public
  • Private
  • Hybrid/Consortium

By Stakeholders

  • Growers
  • Food Manufacturers/Processors
  • Retailers
  • Others

By Providers

  • Application and Solution
  • Middleware Infrastructure
  • Protocol Provider
  • Others

By Organization Size

  • Small and medium-sized enterprises
  • Large enterprises

By Distribution Channel

  • Company Stores
  • E-Commerce
  • Others

By Application

  • Product traceability, tracking and visibility
  • Payment and settlement
  • Smart contract
  • Governance, risk and compliance management

By Region

  • North America
    • U.S.
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • France
    • Italy
    • Russia
    • Rest of Europe
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa

Key Developments

  • In August 2020, The renowned blockchain platform Quorum from JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM.N) has been bought by Brooklyn-based technology firm ConsenSys.
  • In June 2020, the Atea, IBM, sjomatbedriftene, has announced a new cross-industry collaboration to use blockchain technology and share supply chain data throughout the Norway's seafood industry which helps in providing safer, better seafood to consumers.

Why Purchase the Report?

  • To visualize the global blockchain in agriculture market segmentation based on type, and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
  • Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
  • Excel data sheet with numerous data points of blockchain in agriculture market-level with all segments.
  • PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
  • Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global blockchain in agriculture market report would provide approximately 85 tables, 89 figures and 186 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

  • Manufacturers/ Buyers
  • Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
  • Research Professionals
  • Emerging Companies

Table of Contents

1. Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1. Research Methodology
  • 1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Snippet by Type
  • 3.2. Snippet by Stakeholders
  • 3.3. Snippet by Providers
  • 3.4. Snippet by Organization Size
  • 3.5. Snippet by Distribution Channel
  • 3.6. Snippet by Application
  • 3.7. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

  • 4.1. Impacting Factors
    • 4.1.1. Drivers
      • 4.1.1.1. Increase in demand for smart agriculture practices
      • 4.1.1.2. Rise in demand for supply chain transparency
    • 4.1.2. Restraints
      • 4.1.2.1. Lack of awareness among consumers
    • 4.1.3. Opportunity
    • 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

  • 5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
  • 5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.3. Pricing Analysis
  • 5.4. Regulatory Analysis

6. COVID-19 Analysis

  • 6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
    • 6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID
    • 6.1.2. Scenario During COVID
    • 6.1.3. Scenario Post COVID
  • 6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
  • 6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
  • 6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
  • 6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
  • 6.6. Conclusion

7. By Type

  • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Type
  • 7.2. Public*
    • 7.2.1. Introduction
    • 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 7.3. Private
  • 7.4. Hybrid/consortium

8. By Stakeholders

  • 8.1. Introduction
    • 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Stakeholders
    • 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Stakeholders
  • 8.2. Growers*
    • 8.2.1. Introduction
    • 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 8.3. Food Manufactures/Processors
  • 8.4. Retailers
  • 8.5. Others

9. By Providers

  • 9.1. Introduction
    • 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Providers
    • 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Providers
  • 9.2. Application and Solution*
    • 9.2.1. Introduction
    • 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 9.3. Middleware Infrastructure
  • 9.4. Protocol Providers
  • 9.5. Others

10. By Organization Size

  • 10.1. Introduction
    • 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Organization Size
  • 10.2. Small and Medium-sized enterprises*
    • 10.2.1. Introduction
    • 10.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 10.3. Large Enterprises

11. By Distribution Chnannel

  • 11.1. Introduction
    • 11.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
    • 11.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Distribution Channel
  • 11.2. Company Stores*
    • 11.2.1. Introduction
    • 11.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 11.3. E-Commerce
  • 11.4. Others

12. By Application

  • 12.1. Introduction
    • 12.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 12.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Application
  • 12.2. Product traceability,treacking and visibility*
    • 12.2.1. Introduction
    • 12.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 12.3. Payment and Settlement
  • 12.4. Smart contract

Governance,risk and compliance management

13. By Region

  • 13.1. Introduction
    • 13.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
    • 13.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
  • 13.2. North America
    • 13.2.1. Introduction
    • 13.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 13.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 13.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Stakeholders
    • 13.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Providers
    • 13.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 13.2.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
    • 13.2.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 13.2.9. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 13.2.9.1. U.S.
      • 13.2.9.2. Canada
      • 13.2.9.3. Mexico
  • 13.3. Europe
    • 13.3.1. Introduction
    • 13.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 13.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 13.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Stakeholders
    • 13.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Providers
    • 13.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 13.3.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
    • 13.3.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 13.3.9. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 13.3.9.1. Germany
      • 13.3.9.2. UK
      • 13.3.9.3. France
      • 13.3.9.4. Italy
      • 13.3.9.5. Russia
      • 13.3.9.6. Rest of Europe
  • 13.4. South America
    • 13.4.1. Introduction
    • 13.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 13.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 13.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Stakeholders
    • 13.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Providers
    • 13.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 13.4.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
    • 13.4.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 13.4.9. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 13.4.9.1. Brazil
      • 13.4.9.2. Argentina
      • 13.4.9.3. Rest of South America
  • 13.5. Asia-Pacific
    • 13.5.1. Introduction
    • 13.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 13.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 13.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Stakeholders
    • 13.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Providers
    • 13.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 13.5.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
    • 13.5.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 13.5.9. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 13.5.9.1. China
      • 13.5.9.2. India
      • 13.5.9.3. Japan
      • 13.5.9.4. Australia
      • 13.5.9.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 13.6. Middle East and Africa
    • 13.6.1. Introduction
    • 13.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 13.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 13.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Stakeholders
    • 13.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Providers
    • 13.6.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 13.6.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
    • 13.6.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application

14. Competitive Landscape

  • 14.1. Competitive Scenario
  • 14.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
  • 14.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

15. Company Profiles

  • 15.1. IBM corporation*
    • 15.1.1. Company Overview
    • 15.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
    • 15.1.3. Financial Overview
    • 15.1.4. Key Developments
  • 15.2. TE-FOOD International GmbH.
  • 15.3. Arc-Net
  • 15.4. iTrust
  • 15.5. SAP SA
  • 15.6. Origintrail
  • 15.7. Ripe Technology, Inc
  • 15.8. GrainChain, Inc
  • 15.9. Bitfury Group Limited
  • 15.10. Amazon Web Services

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

16. Appendix

  • 16.1. About Us and Services
  • 16.2. Contact Us