油田刺激用化学品の世界市場規模：製品別、用途別、地域別、範囲および予測

油田刺激用化学品の市場規模と予測

油田刺激用化学品市場規模は、2023年に305億8,000万米ドルと評価され、2024年から2031年にかけて3.91%のCAGRで成長し、2031年には398億2,000万米ドルに達すると予測されています。油田刺激用化学品は、石油・ガス貯留層からの炭化水素の生産と回収を増加させるために使用される専門物質の一種です。これらの化合物は、貯留層から坑井への炭化水素の流れを改善することにより、石油・ガス分野で重要な役割を果たしています。刺激治療としても知られるこれらの方法は、岩層の浸透性を変え、流体の粘度を下げ、地層の損傷を緩和するために、貯留層に化学物質を注入することを含みます。刺激用化学品には、酸、界面活性剤、腐食防止剤、スケール防止剤、摩擦低減剤などが含まれます。

それぞれの化学薬品は、坑井の損傷、地層の目詰まり、流体の流動性の低下など、明確な難題に対処し、石油・ガス採掘の全体的な効率と生産量を高める。石油・ガス層の生産率を高め、経済的な存続可能性を拡大するためには、油田刺激用化学品の適切な選択と投与が不可欠です。

油田刺激用化学品は、石油・ガス井の生産性と効率を高めるために不可欠です。これらの特殊な化学薬品は、貯留層の岩石から坑井への炭化水素の流れを強化しようとする水圧破砕（フラッキング）として知られる手順で使用されます。

腐食防止剤は、油田刺激用化学品の重要なカテゴリーであり、掘削および生産設備の金属部品を、過酷なダウンホール条件による劣化から保護します。殺生物剤は、バイオフィルムの形成に寄与し、結果として貯留層の浸透性を低下させるバクテリアの増殖を制限する、もう一つの重要な化学物質群です。界面活性剤もまた、流体の表面張力を変化させ、石油・ガスが貯留層内をより容易に流れるようにするためによく使用されます。

世界の油田刺激用化学品市場力学

主な市場促進要因

世界のエネルギー需要の増加：

世界のエネルギー需要の増加：世界の人口増加と開発がエネルギー需要を押し上げます。従来の石油・ガス在庫が減少するにつれ、既存の油井から炭化水素を回収するための効果的な油田刺激の重要性が増しています。

油田の老朽化：

世界中の多くの油田が老朽化し、生産率が低下しています。油田刺激剤は、貯留層の浸透性と流体の流れを増加させることで、成熟した油田の生産性を回復・向上させるために使用されます。

シェール革命：

シェールオイル・ガスなどの非在来型資源の出現は、エネルギー情勢を一変させました。シェールのような稠密な地層から炭化水素を抽出するには、油田刺激用化学品、すなわち水圧破砕液が不可欠です。

技術の進歩：

より効果的な新しい化学組成の開発など、油田刺激技術の継続的な改善は、効率と生産率の向上に役立っています。企業は、斬新な解決策を生み出すために研究開発に投資しています。

規制環境：

厳しい環境規制と持続可能な慣行の重視の高まりにより、環境に優しく生分解性の油田刺激用化学品の使用が促進されています。企業は、環境規制を満たす化学物質の使用を求められています。

世界の探査・生産活動：

石油・ガスの成長地域における継続的な探査・生産活動が、油田刺激用化学品の需要を促進しています。より多くの坑井が掘られるにつれ、最適な生産のために効果的な刺激がますます重要になっています。

主な課題

環境への影響：

油田刺激に使用される化学薬品は、正しく管理・廃棄されなければ、環境危険を引き起こす可能性があります。土壌や水源が汚染され、長期的な生態系へのダメージを引き起こす可能性があります。

規制の遵守：

刺激用化学品の使用と廃棄には、厳しい規則が適用されます。石油・ガス企業は、地域、国、国際的な規則に従わなければならないが、これらの規則は複雑で変更される可能性があります。

化学物質の適合性：

同じ坑井で異なる刺激用化学品を使用する場合、相溶性の懸念が生じる可能性があります。ある種の化合物は互いに反応する可能性があり、その結果、効果が低下したり、危険な結果を招いたりすることもあります。

貯留層の不均一性：

浸透率や孔隙率のような貯留層パラメータのばらつきは、貯留層全体で均一に出力を増加させる刺激手順を開発することを困難にする可能性があります。

地層の損傷：

一部の刺激用化学品は、間隙を詰まらせたり、岩石の浸透性を変化させたりすることにより、地層を損傷する可能性があります。その結果、石油・ガスの流量が低下し、坑井の生産性が全体的に低下する可能性があります。

コスト：

刺激用化学品と関連技術のコストは高くつく可能性があります。石油・ガス事業者は、費用対効果を上げながら、これらの化学薬品を効率的に使用することに苦戦を強いられています。

主要動向：

環境に優しいソリューション

より環境に優しい刺激薬品の開発が重視されつつあります。企業は、石油・ガス操業による環境への影響を軽減するため、既存の化学薬品に代わるより環境に優しいものを探しています。

先進流体システム

水圧破砕流体システムの革新に焦点が当てられています。これには、環境に配慮しながら坑井の生産量を増加させる改良型フラクチャリング液の開発が含まれます。

デジタル化とデータ分析

デジタル技術とデータ分析は、油田操業にますます統合されつつあります。データ主導の洞察による刺激プロセスのリアルタイムモニタリングと最適化は、より一般的になると予測されます。

化学物質の効率化とコスト削減

石油・ガス事業は、刺激用化学品の効果を高める方法を常に模索しています。これには、坑井ごとに必要な化学薬品の量を減らし、総費用を削減するための処方の修正も含まれます。

プロパント技術：

設計されたプロパントの使用や、貯留層内でのプロパントの挙動に関する知識の向上など、プロパント技術の進歩が続いています。プロパントは、亀裂の維持と炭化水素の回収において重要な役割を果たします。

水管理への注力

石油・ガス事業では、持続可能な水管理の実践がますます重要になってきています。これには、より水効率の高い刺激流体の開発や、水のリサイクル・処理技術の導入が必要です。

目次

第1章 油田刺激用化学品の世界市場：イントロダクション

• 市場のイントロダクション
• 調査範囲
• 前提条件

第2章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第3章 VERIFIED MARKET RESEARCHの調査手法

• データマイニング
• バリデーション
• 一次資料
• データソース一覧

第4章 油田刺激用化学品の世界市場展望

• 概要
• 市場力学
  • 促進要因
  • 抑制要因
  • 機会
• ポーターのファイブフォースモデル
• バリューチェーン分析

第5章 油田刺激用化学品の世界市場：製品別

• 概要
• 摩擦低減剤
• ゲル化剤
• 腐食・スケール抑制剤
• 界面活性剤
• その他

第6章 油田刺激用化学品の世界市場：用途別

• 概要
• 酸性フラッキング
• 水圧破砕
• マトリックス酸性化
• その他

第7章 油田刺激用化学品の世界市場：地域別

• 概要
• 北米
  • 米国
  • カナダ
  • メキシコ
• 欧州
  • ドイツ
  • 英国
  • フランス
  • その他欧州
• アジア太平洋
  • 中国
  • 日本
  • インド
  • その他アジア太平洋地域
• 世界のその他の地域
  • ラテンアメリカ
  • 中東・アフリカ

第8章 油田刺激用化学品の世界市場：競合情勢

• 概要
• 各社の市場シェア
• 主な開発戦略

第9章 企業プロファイル

• Baker Hughes
• BASF SE
• EI DuPont De Nemours
• DOW Chemical Company
• Halliburton
• Flotek Industries Inc.
• Schlumberger Ltd.
• Clariant
• Chevron Philips Chemical Company
• Ashland

第10章 付録

• 関連調査

Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market Size And Forecast

Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market size was valued at USD 30.58 Billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 39.82 Billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 3.91% from 2024 to 2031. Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals are a class of specialist substances used to increase the production and recovery of hydrocarbons from oil and gas reservoirs. These compounds play an important role in the oil and gas sector by improving hydrocarbon flow from reservoirs to wells. These methods, also known as stimulation treatments, include the injection of chemicals into the reservoir to alter the permeability of the rock formation, lower fluid viscosity, and alleviate formation damage. Stimulation chemicals may include acids, surfactants, corrosion inhibitors, scale inhibitors, and friction reducers, among others.

Each chemical addresses a distinct difficulty, such as wellbore damage, formation clogging, or low fluid mobility, thereby enhancing the overall efficiency and production of oil and gas extraction. The proper selection and administration of Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals is critical for increasing production rates and extending the economic viability of oil and gas reservoirs.

Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals are critical to increasing the productivity and efficiency of oil and gas wells. These specialized chemicals are used in a procedure known as hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, which tries to enhance hydrocarbon flow from reservoir rocks to wellbore.

Corrosion inhibitors are a significant category of Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals that preserve metal components of drilling and production equipment from deterioration induced by harsh downhole conditions. Biocides are another important group of chemicals that limit the growth of bacteria, which can contribute to the formation of biofilms and, as a result, reduce reservoir permeability. Surfactants are also often employed to modify fluid surface tension, allowing oil and gas to flow more easily through the reservoir.

Global Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market Dynamics

The key market dynamics that are shaping the Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market include:

Key Market Drivers:

Rising Global Energy Demand:

Rising global population and development drive up energy demand. As conventional oil and gas stocks dwindle, effective oilfield stimulation to recover hydrocarbons from existing wells becomes increasingly important.

Aging Oilfields:

Many oilfields throughout the world are aging, resulting in lower production rates. Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals are used to rejuvenate and improve the production of mature wells by increasing reservoir permeability and fluid flow.

Shale Revolution:

The emergence of unconventional resources, such as shale oil and gas, has altered the energy landscape. Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals, namely hydraulic fracturing fluids, are critical in extracting hydrocarbons from tight formations such as shale.

Technological Advances:

Ongoing improvements in oilfield stimulation technology, including as the creation of new and more effective chemical compositions, help to boost efficiency and production rates. Companies are investing in R&D to produce novel solutions.

Regulatory Environment:

Stringent environmental restrictions and a growing emphasis on sustainable practices are promoting the use of environmentally benign and biodegradable Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals. Companies are required to employ chemicals that meet environmental regulations.

Global Exploration and Production Activities:

Ongoing exploration and production activities in growing oil and gas regions drive the demand for oilfield stimulating chemicals. As more wells are dug, effective stimulation becomes increasingly important for optimal production.

Key Challenges:

Environmental Impact:

Chemicals used in oilfield stimulation might cause environmental hazards if not managed and disposed of correctly. Contamination of soil and water supplies might occur, causing long-term ecological damage.

Regulatory Compliance:

The use and disposal of stimulating chemicals are subject to stringent rules. Oil and gas enterprises must follow local, national, and international rules, which can be complex and susceptible to change.

Chemical Compatibility:

Compatibility concerns may develop when utilizing different stimulating chemicals in the same well. Certain compounds can react with one another, resulting in diminished effectiveness or even hazardous consequences.

Reservoir heterogeneity:

Variations in reservoir parameters, like as permeability and porosity, can make it difficult to develop stimulation procedures that increase output evenly throughout the reservoir.

Formation Damage:

Some stimulating chemicals can harm the formation by clogging pore spaces or changing the rock's permeability. This might result in lower oil and gas flow and overall, well productivity.

Costs:

The cost of stimulation chemicals and related technologies can be high. Oil and gas operators face a continuing struggle in making efficient use of these chemicals while being cost effective.

Key Trends:

Environmentally Friendly Solutions

: There is a rising emphasis on creating stimulating chemicals that are more environmentally friendly. Companies are looking for greener alternatives to existing chemicals to reduce the environmental impact of oil and gas operations.

Advanced Fluid Systems

: The focus has been on innovations in hydraulic fracturing fluid systems. This includes the development of improved fracturing fluids that increase well production while remaining environmentally responsible.

Digitalization and Data Analytics

: Digital technology and data analytics are increasingly being integrated into oilfield operations. Real-time monitoring and optimization of stimulation processes using data-driven insights are projected to become more common.

Chemical Efficiency and Cost Reduction

: Oil and gas businesses are constantly looking for ways to increase the effectiveness of stimulating chemicals. This includes modifying formulas to reduce the amount of chemicals needed per well, cutting total expenses.

Proppant Technology:

Advancements in proppant technology, including as the use of designed proppants and a greater knowledge of their behavior in the reservoir, are ongoing. Proppants play an important role in fracture maintenance and hydrocarbon recovery.

Focus on Water Management:

In the oil and gas business, sustainable water management practices are becoming increasingly important. This entails developing more water-efficient stimulation fluids as well as implementing water recycling and treatment technologies.

What's inside a VMR industry report?

Our reports include actionable data and forward-looking analysis that help you craft pitches, create business plans, build presentations and write proposals.

Global Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market Regional Analysis

Here is a more detailed regional analysis of the Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market:

Asia-pacific

The Asia-Pacific area, particularly China and India, has seen significant industrialization and urbanization, resulting in increased need for energy. As a result, there may be increased demand for oil and gas exploration and production activities, such as the use of oilfield stimulating chemicals.

The Asia-Pacific area is home to several major oil-producing countries and regions, including the Middle East. These areas frequently engage extensively in oilfield development and production, resulting in a greater use of oilfield stimulating chemicals.

Strong investments in the oil and gas sector by governments and corporate organizations in the Asia-Pacific region can help the market for Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals grow.

Europe

If European countries create and hold innovative technology for oilfield stimulation, they will have a competitive advantage in the market. This includes advancements in chemical compositions, application techniques, and environmental considerations.

Significant investment in R&D activities by European firms or institutes can result in the development of superior oilfield stimulating chemicals. This might lead to a dominant market position due to improved product performance and efficiency.

Europe is known for its stringent environmental standards. If European Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals comply with these standards, they can gain a competitive edge. Environmentally friendly and sustainable solutions are becoming increasingly popular in the global marketplace.

Global Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market: Segmentation Analysis

The Global Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market is segmented on the basis of Product, Application, and Geography.

Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market, By Product

• Friction Reducers
• Gelling Agents
• Corrosion and Scale Inhibitors
• Surfactants
• Others

Based on Product, The market is segmented into Friction Reducers, Gelling Agents, Corrosion and Scale Inhibitors, Surfactants, and Others. The gelling agent segment holds the largest market share during the forecast period. Surfactants are estimated to witness the highest CAGR during the forecast period.

Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market, By Application

• Acid Fracking
• Hydraulic Fracturing
• Matrix Acidization
• Others

Based on Application, The market is segmented into Acid Fracking, Hydraulic Fracturing, Matrix Acidization, and Others. The hydraulic fracturing segment holds the largest market share and is estimated to witness the highest CAGR during the forecast period.

Key Players

• The "Global Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Market" study report will provide valuable insight with an emphasis on the global market. The major players in the market are
• Baker Hughes, BASF SE, EI DuPont De Nemours, DOW Chemical Company, Halliburton, Flotek Industries Inc., Schlumberger Ltd., Clariant, Chevron Philips Chemical Company, Ashland, Albemarle Corporation, Solvay SA, and Akzonobel NV.

Our market analysis also entails a section solely dedicated to such major players wherein our analysts provide an insight into the financial statements of all the major players, along with product benchmarking and SWOT analysis.

• Oilfield Stimulation Chemicals Recent Developments
• In May 2021, Schlumberger and NOV worked together to promote the use of automated drilling systems by oil and gas companies and drilling contractors. Through this strategic cooperation, drilling operations will be more efficient, safer, and allow for the automation of manual tasks.
• In November 2020, through the acquisition of a 25% share in OPT Petroleum Technologies Company Limited, The Industrialization and Energy Services Company (TAQA) increased the scope of its oilfield chemicals expertise.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION OF GLOBAL OILFIELD STIMULATION CHEMICALS MARKET

• 1.1 Introduction of the Market
• 1.2 Scope of Report
• 1.3 Assumptions

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY OF VERIFIED MARKET RESEARCH

• 3.1 Data Mining
• 3.2 Validation
• 3.3 Primary Interviews
• 3.4 List of Data Sources

4 GLOBAL OILFIELD STIMULATION CHEMICALS MARKET OUTLOOK

• 4.1 Overview
• 4.2 Market Dynamics
  • 4.2.1 Drivers
  • 4.2.2 Restraints
  • 4.2.3 Opportunities
• 4.3 Porters Five Force Model
• 4.4 Value Chain Analysis

5 GLOBAL OILFIELD STIMULATION CHEMICALS MARKET, BY PRODUCT

• 5.1 Overview
• 5.2 Friction Reducers
• 5.3 Gelling Agents
• 5.4 Corrosion and Scale Inhibitors
• 5.5 Surfactants
• 5.6 Others

6 GLOBAL OILFIELD STIMULATION CHEMICALS MARKET, BY APPLICATION

• 6.1 Overview
• 6.2 Acid Fracking
• 6.3 Hydraulic Fracturing
• 6.4 Matrix Acidization
• 6.5 Others

7 GLOBAL OILFIELD STIMULATION CHEMICALS MARKET, BY GEOGRAPHY

• 7.1 Overview
• 7.2 North America
  • 7.2.1 U.S.
  • 7.2.2 Canada
  • 7.2.3 Mexico
• 7.3 Europe
  • 7.3.1 Germany
  • 7.3.2 U.K.
  • 7.3.3 France
  • 7.3.4 Rest of Europe
• 7.4 Asia Pacific
  • 7.4.1 China
  • 7.4.2 Japan
  • 7.4.3 India
  • 7.4.4 Rest of Asia Pacific
• 7.5 Rest of the World
  • 7.5.1 Latin America
  • 7.5.2 Middle East & Africa

8 GLOBAL OILFIELD STIMULATION CHEMICALS MARKET COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

• 8.1 Overview
• 8.2 Company Market Share
• 8.3 Key Development Strategies

9 COMPANY PROFILES

• 9.1 Baker Hughes
  • 9.1.1 Overview
  • 9.1.2 Financial Performance
  • 9.1.3 Product Outlook
  • 9.1.4 Key Developments
• 9.2 BASF SE
  • 9.2.1 Overview
  • 9.2.2 Financial Performance
  • 9.2.3 Product Outlook
  • 9.2.4 Key Developments
• 9.3 EI DuPont De Nemours
  • 9.3.1 Overview
  • 9.3.2 Financial Performance
  • 9.3.3 Product Outlook
  • 9.3.4 Key Developments
• 9.4 DOW Chemical Company
  • 9.4.1 Overview
  • 9.4.2 Financial Performance
  • 9.4.3 Product Outlook
  • 9.4.4 Key Developments
• 9.5 Halliburton
  • 9.5.1 Overview
  • 9.5.2 Financial Performance
  • 9.5.3 Product Outlook
  • 9.5.4 Key Developments
• 9.6 Flotek Industries Inc.
  • 9.6.1 Overview
  • 9.6.2 Financial Performance
  • 9.6.3 Product Outlook
  • 9.6.4 Key Developments
• 9.7 Schlumberger Ltd.
  • 9.7.1 Overview
  • 9.7.2 Financial Performance
  • 9.7.3 Product Outlook
  • 9.7.4 Key Developments
• 9.8 Clariant
  • 9.8.1 Overview
  • 9.8.2 Financial Performance
  • 9.8.3 Product Outlook
  • 9.8.4 Key Developments
• 9.9 Chevron Philips Chemical Company
  • 9.9.1 Overview
  • 9.9.2 Financial Performance
  • 9.9.3 Product Outlook
  • 9.9.4 Key Developments
• 9.10 Ashland
  • 9.10.1 Overview
  • 9.10.2 Financial Performance
  • 9.10.3 Product Outlook
  • 9.10.4 Key Developments

10 Appendix

• 10.1 Related Research