食肉スペシエーション検査市場 - 世界の産業規模、シェア、動向、機会、予測：種別、技術別、形態別、地域別、競合、2020年～2030年

食肉スペシエーション検査の世界市場規模は、2024年に47億2,000万米ドルとなり、2030年までのCAGRは8.03％で、予測期間には90億7,000万米ドルに達すると予測されています。

世界の食肉スペシエーション検査市場の成長を牽引しているのは、食品不正、特に種の偽装表示の増加です。知名度の高いスキャンダルがいくつか発生したことで、世界的に国民の意識が高まり、食品規制が厳しくなっています。欧州食品安全機関（EFSA）、米国農務省（USDA）、インド食品安全基準局（FSSAI）などの当局は、種の識別のためのより厳格なプロトコルを導入しており、食肉生産者や加工業者は、コンプライアンスを確保し消費者の信頼を守るため、PCR（ポリメラーゼ連鎖反応）やDNAバーコーディングのような高度な検査方法の採用を余儀なくされています。

市場促進要因

急増する食品不正と種の不当表示

主な市場課題

高い検査コストと限られたインフラ

主要市場動向

ポータブル＆迅速検査技術の採用拡大

目次

第1章 概要

第2章 調査手法

第3章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第4章 顧客の声

第5章 世界の食肉スペシエーション検査市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
  • 金額別
• 市場シェア・予測
  • 種別（牛、鶏、馬、豚、羊など）
  • 技術別（ポリメラーゼ連鎖反応、酵素免疫測定法など）
  • 形態別（生肉、調理済み肉、加工肉）
  • 企業別（2024）
  • 地域別
• 市場マップ

第6章 北米の食肉スペシエーション検査市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
• 市場シェア・予測
• 北米：国別分析
  • 米国
  • メキシコ
  • カナダ

第7章 欧州の食肉スペシエーション検査市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
• 市場シェア・予測
• 欧州：国別分析
  • フランス
  • ドイツ
  • 英国
  • イタリア
  • スペイン

第8章 アジア太平洋地域の食肉スペシエーション検査市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
• 市場シェア・予測
• アジア太平洋地域：国別分析
  • 中国
  • インド
  • 韓国
  • 日本
  • オーストラリア

第9章 南米の食肉スペシエーション検査市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
• 市場シェア・予測
• 南米：国別分析
  • ブラジル
  • アルゼンチン
  • コロンビア

第10章 中東・アフリカの食肉スペシエーション検査市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
• 市場シェア・予測
• 中東・アフリカ：国別分析
  • 南アフリカ
  • サウジアラビア
  • アラブ首長国連邦

第11章 市場力学

• 促進要因
• 課題

第12章 市場動向と発展

• 合併と買収
• 製品上市
• 最近の動向

第13章 混乱：紛争、パンデミック、貿易障壁

第14章 ポーターのファイブフォース分析

• 業界内の競合
• 新規参入の可能性
• サプライヤーの力
• 顧客の力
• 代替品の脅威

第15章 競合情勢

• VWR International LLC
• ALS Limited
• Eurofins Scientific SE
• International Laboratory Services Ltd.
• Genetic ID NA, Inc.
• Neogen Corporation
• LGC Science Group Ltd.
• AB Sciex LLC
• Scientific Analysis Laboratories Ltd

第16章 戦略的提言

第17章 調査会社について・免責事項

Global Meat Speciation Testing Market was valued at USD 4.72 billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 9.07 billion in the forecast period with a CAGR of 8.03% through 2030. Driving growth in the global meat speciation testing market is the increasing incidence of food fraud, particularly species mislabeling. Several high-profile scandals have led to heightened public awareness and stricter food regulations worldwide. Authorities such as the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), and Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) have introduced more rigorous protocols for species identification, compelling meat producers and processors to adopt advanced testing methods like PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) and DNA barcoding to ensure compliance and protect consumer trust.

Key Market Drivers

Escalating Food Fraud & Species Mislabeling

The rising prevalence of food fraud-particularly in meat products-continues to challenge food safety systems globally. Species mislabeling, where one type of meat is deliberately or accidentally substituted for another, has become a frequent concern. In 2024, nearly 1 in 5 food fraud cases worldwide involved animal-origin products, highlighting the scale of the issue. This is especially critical in processed or ground meat, where visual identification is impossible. As trust in food labeling diminishes, governments and companies are investing heavily in meat speciation tests to ensure transparency and prevent consumer deception.

The frequency of species mislabeling in meat has grown significantly in recent years. Between 2020 and 2023, there was a 42% increase in substitution cases in certain European markets, driven largely by economic pressures and fragmented supply chains. Many incidents involved lower-cost meats like horse or pork being sold as beef or lamb. Such practices not only mislead consumers but also carry legal, ethical, and religious implications. The spike in these incidents is driving more widespread adoption of DNA-based testing methods across supply chains to uphold accuracy and prevent brand damage.

Food companies face increasing scrutiny as consumers demand accountability and transparency in product sourcing. In one recent audit, 14% of supposedly halal-certified meat products were found to contain traces of undeclared pork DNA, raising alarm among both regulators and religious organizations. This incident underscores the critical need for rigorous testing and certification systems. With multicultural societies growing globally, compliance with religious and ethical meat standards is no longer optional but a business imperative. Advanced molecular diagnostics are becoming a frontline tool in preventing such violations and maintaining consumer trust.

Technological advancements in DNA testing have made species identification faster, more accurate, and cost-effective. Multiplex PCR systems, for example, now allow simultaneous detection of multiple meat types in a single test, with adoption rates growing across meat processing hubs. In fact, in several developed regions, demand for multiplex PCR testing has risen by over 25% since 2021, as manufacturers seek to catch both intentional and accidental adulteration. As governments tighten regulations and penalties for fraud, companies are proactively integrating meat speciation protocols into quality control processes to avoid recalls, fines, and reputational losses.

Key Market Challenges

High Testing Costs & Limited Infrastructure

High testing costs continue to pose a significant barrier to the widespread adoption of meat speciation testing, particularly among small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and manufacturers in low-to-middle-income countries. Advanced molecular testing technologies like PCR, LAMP, and DNA sequencing require specialized instruments, reagents, and skilled personnel-all of which demand substantial upfront investment. The recurring cost of consumables, calibration, and maintenance further adds to the burden, making routine testing financially unviable for many. Additionally, certification requirements and third-party testing charges can increase operational expenses, especially for businesses exporting to regions with stringent import regulations. This economic pressure discourages companies from incorporating testing into their standard quality control procedures. As a result, despite the clear need for species authentication to prevent fraud and ensure compliance, many producers delay or avoid testing altogether due to concerns over return on investment.

Infrastructure limitations further exacerbate the challenge, particularly in remote or developing regions. Reliable access to electricity, refrigeration for reagents, and contamination-free laboratory environments are essential for accurate testing-yet these basic requirements remain inconsistent in several countries. Even where testing facilities exist, they may be too far from production centers, causing delays in sample transport and result turnaround. This lag undermines real-time quality assurance, increasing the risk of fraudulent or mislabelled meat reaching consumers. In some cases, lack of government-accredited labs or delays in establishing regulatory frameworks hinder companies from complying with international standards.

Key Market Trends

Growing Adoption of Portable & Rapid Testing Technologies

The shift toward portable and rapid testing technologies is transforming how meat speciation is conducted across the food supply chain. Traditional laboratory-based methods, while accurate, are time-consuming, costly, and often centralized-leading to delays in quality assurance and regulatory compliance. In contrast, portable testing tools such as LAMP (Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification), handheld PCR devices, and biosensors offer quick and reliable on-site results without the need for specialized lab infrastructure. These tools are particularly valuable for slaughterhouses, border inspection units, and decentralized processing facilities where immediate verification of species is essential. They reduce turnaround time from days to under an hour, enabling rapid decision-making and minimizing the risk of contaminated or mislabeled meat entering the market. This transition is accelerating as companies seek operational efficiency, lower testing costs, and compliance with increasingly time-sensitive food safety regulations.

The growing appeal of these rapid technologies is also linked to their adaptability and user-friendliness. New portable devices are being designed with simplified workflows, built-in data recording, and compatibility with digital traceability platforms. As a result, even non-technical staff in production settings can perform basic testing without the need for advanced training. This democratization of testing is especially beneficial in developing countries, where laboratory infrastructure may be limited or absent.

Key Market Players

• VWR International LLC
• ALS Limited
• Eurofins Scientific SE
• International Laboratory Services Ltd.
• Genetic ID NA, Inc.
• Neogen Corporation
• LGC Science Group Ltd.
• AB Sciex LLC
• Scientific Analysis Laboratories Ltd

Report Scope:

In this report, Global Meat Speciation Testing market has been segmented into following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Meat Speciation Testing Market, By Species:

• Cow
• Chicken
• Horse
• Swine
• Sheep
• Others

Meat Speciation Testing Market, By Technology:

• Polymerase Chain Reaction
• Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
• Others

Meat Speciation Testing Market, By Form:

• Raw
• Cooked
• Processed Meat

Meat Speciation Testing Market, by Region:

• Asia Pacific
• China
• India
• Japan
• South Korea
• Australia
• Europe
• France
• Germany
• United Kingdom
• Italy
• Spain
• North America
• United States
• Mexico
• Canada
• South America
• Brazil
• Argentina
• Colombia
• Middle East and Africa
• South Africa
• Saudi Arabia
• UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in Global Meat Speciation Testing market.

Available Customizations:

With the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to the company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

• Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

• 1.1. Market Definition
• 1.2. Scope of the Market
  • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
  • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
  • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Objective of the Study
• 2.2. Baseline Methodology
• 2.3. Key Industry Partners
• 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
• 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
• 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
• 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Overview of the Market
• 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
• 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
• 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
• 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, and Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook

• 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 5.1.1. By Value
• 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 5.2.1. By Species (Cow, Chicken, Horse, Swine, Sheep and Others)
  • 5.2.2. By Technology (Polymerase Chain Reaction, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay and Others)
  • 5.2.3. By Form (Raw, Cooked and Processed Meat)
  • 5.2.4. By Company (2024)
  • 5.2.5. By Region
• 5.3. Market Map

6. North America Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook

• 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 6.1.1. By Value
• 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 6.2.1. By Species
  • 6.2.2. By Technology
  • 6.2.3. By Form
  • 6.2.4. By Country
• 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
  • 6.3.1. United States Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.2.1. By Species
      • 6.3.1.2.2. By Technology
      • 6.3.1.2.3. By Form
  • 6.3.2. Mexico Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.2.1. By Species
      • 6.3.2.2.2. By Technology
      • 6.3.2.2.3. By Form
  • 6.3.3. Canada Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.2.1. By Species
      • 6.3.3.2.2. By Technology
      • 6.3.3.2.3. By Form

7. Europe Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook

• 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.1.1. By Value
• 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 7.2.1. By Species
  • 7.2.2. By Technology
  • 7.2.3. By Form
  • 7.2.4. By Country
• 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
  • 7.3.1. France Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.2.1. By Species
      • 7.3.1.2.2. By Technology
      • 7.3.1.2.3. By Form
  • 7.3.2. Germany Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.2.1. By Species
      • 7.3.2.2.2. By Technology
      • 7.3.2.2.3. By Form
  • 7.3.3. United Kingdom Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.2.1. By Species
      • 7.3.3.2.2. By Technology
      • 7.3.3.2.3. By Form
  • 7.3.4. Italy Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.2.1. By Species
      • 7.3.4.2.2. By Technology
      • 7.3.4.2.3. By Form
  • 7.3.5. Spain Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.2.1. By Species
      • 7.3.5.2.2. By Technology
      • 7.3.5.2.3. By Form

8. Asia-Pacific Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook

• 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.1.1. By Value
• 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 8.2.1. By Species
  • 8.2.2. By Technology
  • 8.2.3. By Form
  • 8.2.4. By Country
• 8.3. Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis
  • 8.3.1. China Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.2.1. By Species
      • 8.3.1.2.2. By Technology
      • 8.3.1.2.3. By Form
  • 8.3.2. India Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.2.1. By Species
      • 8.3.2.2.2. By Technology
      • 8.3.2.2.3. By Form
  • 8.3.3. South Korea Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.2.1. By Species
      • 8.3.3.2.2. By Technology
      • 8.3.3.2.3. By Form
  • 8.3.4. Japan Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.2.1. By Species
      • 8.3.4.2.2. By Technology
      • 8.3.4.2.3. By Form
  • 8.3.5. Australia Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.2.1. By Species
      • 8.3.5.2.2. By Technology
      • 8.3.5.2.3. By Form

9. South America Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook

• 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.1.1. By Value
• 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 9.2.1. By Species
  • 9.2.2. By Technology
  • 9.2.3. By Form
  • 9.2.4. By Country
• 9.3. South America: Country Analysis
  • 9.3.1. Brazil Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.2.1. By Species
      • 9.3.1.2.2. By Technology
      • 9.3.1.2.3. By Form
  • 9.3.2. Argentina Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.2.1. By Species
      • 9.3.2.2.2. By Technology
      • 9.3.2.2.3. By Form
  • 9.3.3. Colombia Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.2.1. By Species
      • 9.3.3.2.2. By Technology
      • 9.3.3.2.3. By Form

10. Middle East and Africa Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook

• 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.1.1. By Value
• 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 10.2.1. By Species
  • 10.2.2. By Technology
  • 10.2.3. By Form
  • 10.2.4. By Country
• 10.3. MEA: Country Analysis
  • 10.3.1. South Africa Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.2.1. By Species
      • 10.3.1.2.2. By Technology
      • 10.3.1.2.3. By Form
  • 10.3.2. Saudi Arabia Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.2.1. By Species
      • 10.3.2.2.2. By Technology
      • 10.3.2.2.3. By Form
  • 10.3.3. UAE Meat Speciation Testing Market Outlook
    • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.2.1. By Species
      • 10.3.3.2.2. By Technology
      • 10.3.3.2.3. By Form

11. Market Dynamics

• 11.1. Drivers
• 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

• 12.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
• 12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
• 12.3. Recent Developments

13. Disruptions: Conflicts, Pandemics and Trade Barriers

14. Porters Five Forces Analysis

• 14.1. Competition in the Industry
• 14.2. Potential of New Entrants
• 14.3. Power of Suppliers
• 14.4. Power of Customers
• 14.5. Threat of Substitute Products

15. Competitive Landscape

• 15.1. VWR International LLC
  • 15.1.1. Business Overview
  • 15.1.2. Company Snapshot
  • 15.1.3. Products & Services
  • 15.1.4. Financials (As Reported)
  • 15.1.5. Recent Developments
  • 15.1.6. Key Personnel Details
  • 15.1.7. SWOT Analysis
• 15.2. ALS Limited
• 15.3. Eurofins Scientific SE
• 15.4. International Laboratory Services Ltd.
• 15.5. Genetic ID NA, Inc.
• 15.6. Neogen Corporation
• 15.7. LGC Science Group Ltd.
• 15.8. AB Sciex LLC
• 15.9. Scientific Analysis Laboratories Ltd

16. Strategic Recommendations

17. About Us & Disclaimer