生物学的軟体動物駆除剤市場 - 世界の産業規模、シェア、動向、機会、予測、タイプ別、用途別、地域別、競合別、2019～2029年

世界の生物学的軟体動物駆除剤の市場規模は、2023年に3億8,104万米ドルとなり、2029年までの予測期間のCAGRは4.65%で着実な成長が予測されています。

天然由来の生物学的軟体動物駆除剤は、農作物に重大な脅威をもたらすナメクジやカタツムリなどの軟体動物を防除・駆除するために使用される非常に効果的な製品です。これらの環境に優しいソリューションは、非標的種への害を最小限に抑えながら軟体動物を標的にし、全体的な環境への影響を低減する能力により人気を博しています。

生物学的軟体動物駆除剤の採用が拡大している背景には、高品質で化学物質を含まない食品に対する需要の高まりがあります。消費者の健康志向や環境意識が高まるにつれ、有機栽培の農産物を好む傾向が高まっています。このような消費者行動の変化は、生物学的軟体動物駆除剤にとって有利な市場環境を作り出しています。

しかし、有望な成長にもかかわらず、生物学的軟体動物駆除剤市場はまだある課題に直面しています。主要な障害のひとつは、合成品と比較して生物学的製剤のコストが相対的に高いことです。このコスト差は、一部の農家、特に発展途上地域の農家が、こうした解決策を全面的に採用することを躊躇させる可能性があります。さらに、生物学的軟体動物駆除剤が提供する多くの特典に関する農家の認識不足が、普及をさらに妨げています。

主要な市場促進要因

農業産業の成長

技術進歩の急増

主要な市場課題

化学軟体動物駆除剤と比較した効力の限界

主要な市場動向

持続可能な農業への需要の高まり

目次

第1章 概要

第2章 調査手法

第3章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第4章 COVID-19が世界の生物学的軟体動物駆除剤市場に与える影響

第5章 世界の生物学的軟体動物駆除剤市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
  • 金額別
• 市場シェア・予測
  • タイプ別（メタアルデヒド、メチオカルブ、リン酸鉄、その他）
  • 用途別（畑作物、園芸作物、芝生・観賞用植物、工業用、その他）
  • 地域別
  • 企業別（2023年）
• 市場マップ

第6章 アジア太平洋の生物学的軟体動物駆除剤市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
  • 金額別
• 市場シェア・予測
  • タイプ別
  • 用途別
  • 国別
• アジア太平洋：国別分析
  • 中国
  • インド
  • オーストラリア
  • 日本
  • 韓国

第7章 欧州の生物学的軟体動物駆除剤市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
  • 金額別
• 市場シェア・予測
  • タイプ別
  • 用途別
  • 国別
• 欧州：国別分析
  • フランス
  • ドイツ
  • スペイン
  • イタリア
  • 英国

第8章 北米の生物学的軟体動物駆除剤市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
  • 金額別
• 市場シェア・予測
  • タイプ別
  • 用途別
  • 国別
• 北米：国別分析
  • 米国
  • メキシコ
  • カナダ

第9章 南米の生物学的軟体動物駆除剤市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
  • 金額別
• 市場シェア・予測
  • タイプ別
  • 用途別
  • 国別
• 南米：国別分析
  • ブラジル
  • アルゼンチン
  • コロンビア

第10章 中東・アフリカの生物学的軟体動物駆除剤市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
  • 金額別
• 市場シェア・予測
  • タイプ別
  • 用途別
  • 国別
• 中東・アフリカ：国別分析
  • 南アフリカ
  • サウジアラビア
  • アラブ首長国連邦

第11章 市場力学

• 促進要因
• 課題

第12章 市場動向と発展

• 最近の動向
• 製品上市
• 合併・買収

第13章 世界の生物学的軟体動物駆除剤市場：SWOT分析

第14章 ポーターのファイブフォース分析

• 業界内の競合
• 新規参入の可能性
• 売り手の交渉力
• 買い手の交渉力
• 代替品の脅威

第15章 PESTEL分析

第16章 競合情勢

• Lonza Group Ltd.
• Bayer CropScience Limited
• AMVAC Chemical Corporation
• BASF SE
• Adama Agricultural Solutions Ltd
• De Sangosse Ltd
• Syngenta Crop Protection AG
• QINGDAO HISIGMA CHEMICALS CO., LTD
• INDUSTRIALCHIMICA S.R.L.
• Doff Portland Ltd

第17章 戦略的提言

第18章 調査会社について・免責事項

Global Biological Molluscicides Market was valued at USD 381.04 Million in 2023 and is anticipated to project steady growth in the forecast period with a CAGR of 4.65% through 2029. Biological molluscicides, derived from natural sources, are highly effective products used to control or eliminate mollusks, including slugs and snails, which pose significant threats to agricultural crops. These environmentally friendly solutions have gained popularity due to their ability to target mollusks while minimizing harm to non-target species and reducing the overall environmental impact.

The growing adoption of biological molluscicides can be attributed to the increasing demand for high-quality, chemical-free food products. As consumers become more health-conscious and environmentally aware, there is a rising preference for organically grown produce. This shift in consumer behavior has created a favorable market environment for biological molluscicides, as they are seen as a sustainable and eco-friendly alternative to synthetic options.

However, despite the promising growth, the biological molluscicides market still faces certain challenges. One of the main obstacles is the relatively higher cost of biological products in comparison to their synthetic counterparts. This cost difference can deter some farmers, particularly those in developing regions, from fully embracing these solutions. Additionally, there is a lack of awareness among farmers regarding the numerous benefits that biological molluscicides offer, further hindering their widespread adoption.

Key Market Drivers

Growth in Agriculture Industry

The agriculture industry has been experiencing robust growth in recent years, driven by the escalating demand for high-yielding crops. This growth has been a significant driver for the global biological molluscicides market. As the agriculture sector expands, so does the need for effective and environmentally friendly pest control solutions.

Biological molluscicides, derived from natural sources, are used to control or eliminate mollusks like slugs and snails, which pose a considerable threat to agricultural crops. With the expansion of the agriculture industry, the demand for these products is on the rise.

As the agriculture industry grows, it brings with it an increased focus on sustainability. The harmful environmental impact of synthetic pesticides is well-documented, leading to a shift towards more eco-friendly alternatives. Farmers and agricultural organizations are increasingly recognizing the importance of adopting sustainable practices to ensure long-term productivity and environmental health.

Biological molluscicides fit perfectly into this narrative. They are not only effective against mollusks but also have minimal impact on non-target species and the environment. This environmental advantage makes them an attractive option for the expanding agriculture industry, further driving the growth of the biological molluscicides market.

Moreover, the use of biological molluscicides aligns with the growing consumer demand for organic and sustainably produced food. Consumers are becoming more conscious of the potential health and environmental risks associated with conventional farming practices, including the use of synthetic pesticides. By utilizing biological molluscicides, farmers can meet the demand for pesticide-free and environmentally friendly produce, thus enhancing consumer trust and marketability of their products.

Surge in Technological Advancements

Technology has been underpinning developments in various sectors, including health, energy, and notably, agriculture. Over the past few decades, we have witnessed an unprecedented acceleration in the development and adoption of technology. This digital surge, particularly noticeable during the Covid-19 pandemic, has revolutionized many aspects of our lives, including how we grow and protect our crops.

Technological advancements are playing a crucial role in the global biological molluscicides market. The rise of precision agriculture, for instance, has allowed farmers to apply these eco-friendly pesticides more accurately and efficiently. This not only enhances their effectiveness against pests like slugs and snails but also reduces their environmental impact.

Also, technology is aiding in the research and development of new and improved biological molluscicides. Advanced bioengineering techniques are being used to create more potent and targeted molluscicides, while data analytics are helping to optimize their use in different agricultural contexts.

In addition to precision agriculture, other technological innovations are shaping the future of biological molluscicides. For example, the use of drones equipped with sensors and imaging tools enables farmers to monitor their fields for signs of mollusk infestation with greater precision and timeliness. This allows for early detection and targeted application of molluscicides, minimizing the overall damage and improving crop yields.

Moreover, advancements in genetic engineering are unlocking new possibilities in the development of molluscicides. Scientists are exploring the modification of plant genes to produce natural compounds that deter mollusks, reducing the reliance on synthetic pesticides and promoting sustainable pest management practices.

Overall, the integration of technology in the field of biological molluscicides is driving significant advancements and offering promising solutions for sustainable agriculture. As we continue to embrace innovation, we can expect further breakthroughs that will enhance the effectiveness, efficiency, and environmental sustainability of molluscicide applications in farming practices.

Key Market Challenges

Limited Efficacy Compared to Chemical Molluscicides

Biological molluscicides, derived from natural sources such as plants and microorganisms, offer a promising solution for controlling harmful mollusks like slugs and snails that pose a significant threat to agricultural crops. These eco-friendly alternatives are designed to target specific mollusk species, reducing the risk of non-target organism harm and minimizing the impact on the environment.

However, it is important to acknowledge that biological molluscicides may have certain limitations in terms of efficacy when compared to chemical molluscicides. While chemical counterparts have been observed to be more effective in controlling mollusk populations, they unfortunately come with the downside of potential harm to non-target organisms and the environment. This trade-off has led many farmers to opt for chemical molluscicides, especially in regions with high mollusk infestations, as they offer better crop protection.

The limited efficacy of biological molluscicides, although a concern, presents an opportunity for further research and development. By exploring ways to enhance their effectiveness, such as through formulation improvements or innovative delivery systems, we can strive towards a more sustainable and effective solution for mollusk control.

Key Market Trends

Growing Demand for Sustainable Agriculture

The trend towards sustainable agriculture has a direct and significant impact on the global biological molluscicides market. With an increasing focus on environmental conservation and the need to minimize the use of harmful chemicals, the demand for eco-friendly pest control solutions has been on the rise. Biological molluscicides, derived from natural sources, offer an effective means to control or eliminate harmful mollusks like slugs and snails, while ensuring minimal impact on non-target organisms and the environment.

As farmers strive to adopt sustainable farming practices, the preference for biological molluscicides over chemical alternatives continues to grow. Despite the higher efficacy of chemical-based solutions, the adverse effects on the environment and non-target organisms make biological alternatives a more attractive choice. By choosing biological molluscicides, farmers not only contribute to sustainable agriculture but also promote a healthier and more balanced ecosystem in their fields.

Segmental Insights

Type Insights

Based on Type, Metaldehyde have emerged as the fastest growing segment in the Global Biological Molluscicides Market in 2023. One of the primary reasons for metaldehyde's dominance is its exceptional effectiveness. Metaldehyde exhibits remarkable rapid action against snails and slugs, two notorious pests that can wreak havoc in agriculture. The potency and speed at which metaldehyde acts make it the preferred choice for countless farmers who are determined to safeguard their precious crops from the relentless onslaught of these pests. Metaldehyde enjoys not only its effectiveness but also its easy availability and affordability, surpassing other types of molluscicides in these aspects. This accessibility and cost-effectiveness have further contributed to making metaldehyde a highly popular and widely adopted choice among farmers, who appreciate its reliable and budget-friendly solution for protecting their valuable crops.

Application Insights

Based on Application, Field Crops have emerged as the dominating segment in the Global Biological Molluscicides Market in 2023. The growing demand for high-yielding crops is driven by various factors, including the need to meet the increasing food requirements of a growing global population. As farmers strive to increase their crop yield, they face challenges from pests like snails and slugs, which can significantly impact crop production. To address this issue, the use of molluscicides has become widespread in agriculture. Molluscicides play a vital role in controlling and reducing mollusk populations, protecting crops from potential damage, and ultimately maximizing crop yield. By effectively managing mollusk infestations, farmers can ensure a more sustainable and productive agricultural system to meet the ever-increasing food demands of the world.

Regional Insights

Based on Region, Asia Pacific have emerged as the dominating region in the Global Biological Molluscicides Market in 2023. The growth and expansion of the agrochemicals industry, particularly in emerging economies such as China and India, has been a significant driving force behind the dominance of the Asia Pacific region in the global molluscicides market. With agriculture playing a vital role in these economies, there is a substantial demand for effective pest control solutions, including molluscicides, to safeguard crop yield and quality. Likewise, the increasing adoption rates of molluscicides in the Asia Pacific region can be attributed to the rising awareness among farmers about the numerous benefits of using these products for pest control. As farmers become more informed about the detrimental impact of mollusks on their crops, they are actively seeking out and embracing molluscicide solutions to mitigate the risks and protect their agricultural investments. This combination of robust agrochemical industry growth, high agricultural dependence, and increasing farmer awareness has solidified the dominance of the Asia Pacific region in the global molluscicides market. As the demand for sustainable and effective pest management solutions continues to rise, the Asia Pacific market is poised for further expansion and development in the coming years.

Key Market Players

Lonza Group Ltd.

Bayer CropScience Limited

AMVAC Chemical Corporation

BASF SE

Adama Agricultural Solutions Ltd

De Sangosse Ltd

Syngenta Crop Protection AG

QINGDAO HISIGMA CHEMICALS CO., LTD

INDUSTRIALCHIMICA S.R.L.

Doff Portland Ltd

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Biological Molluscicides Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Biological Molluscicides Market, By Type:

Metaldehyde Methiocarb Ferrous Phosphate Others

Biological Molluscicides Market, By Application:

Field Crops Horticultural Crops Turf & Ornamentals Industrial Other

Biological Molluscicides Market, By Region:

North America
• United States
• Canada
• Mexico
Europe
• France
• United Kingdom
• Italy
• Germany
• Spain
Asia Pacific
• China
• India
• Japan
• Australia
• South Korea
South America
• Brazil
• Argentina
• Colombia
Middle East & Africa
• South Africa
• Saudi Arabia
• UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Biological Molluscicides Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Biological Molluscicides Market report with the given market data, Tech Sci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

• 1.1. Market Definition
• 1.2. Scope of the Market
  • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
  • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
  • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Objective of the Study
• 2.2. Baseline Methodology
• 2.3. Key Industry Partners
• 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
• 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
• 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
• 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Overview of the Market
• 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
• 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
• 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
• 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends

4. Impact of COVID-19 on Global Biological Molluscicides Market

5. Global Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook

• 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 5.1.1. By Value
• 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 5.2.1. By Type (Metaldehyde, Methiocarb, Ferrous Phosphate, Others)
  • 5.2.2. By Application (Field Crops, Horticultural Crops, Turf & Ornamentals, Industrial, Other)
  • 5.2.3. By Region
  • 5.2.4. By Company (2023)
• 5.3. Market Map

6. Asia Pacific Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook

• 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 6.1.1. By Value
• 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 6.2.1. By Type
  • 6.2.2. By Application
  • 6.2.3. By Country
• 6.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
  • 6.3.1. China Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.2.1. By Type
      • 6.3.1.2.2. By Application
  • 6.3.2. India Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.2.1. By Type
      • 6.3.2.2.2. By Application
  • 6.3.3. Australia Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.2.1. By Type
      • 6.3.3.2.2. By Application
  • 6.3.4. Japan Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 6.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.4.2.1. By Type
      • 6.3.4.2.2. By Application
  • 6.3.5. South Korea Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 6.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.5.2.1. By Type
      • 6.3.5.2.2. By Application

7. Europe Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook

• 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.1.1. By Value
• 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 7.2.1. By Type
  • 7.2.2. By Application
  • 7.2.3. By Country
• 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
  • 7.3.1. France Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.2.1. By Type
      • 7.3.1.2.2. By Application
  • 7.3.2. Germany Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.2.1. By Type
      • 7.3.2.2.2. By Application
  • 7.3.3. Spain Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.2.1. By Type
      • 7.3.3.2.2. By Application
  • 7.3.4. Italy Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.2.1. By Type
      • 7.3.4.2.2. By Application
  • 7.3.5. United Kingdom Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.2.1. By Type
      • 7.3.5.2.2. By Application

8. North America Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook

• 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.1.1. By Value
• 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 8.2.1. By Type
  • 8.2.2. By Application
  • 8.2.3. By Country
• 8.3. North America: Country Analysis
  • 8.3.1. United States Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.2.1. By Type
      • 8.3.1.2.2. By Application
  • 8.3.2. Mexico Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.2.1. By Type
      • 8.3.2.2.2. By Application
  • 8.3.3. Canada Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.2.1. By Type
      • 8.3.3.2.2. By Application

9. South America Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook

• 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.1.1. By Value
• 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 9.2.1. By Type
  • 9.2.2. By Application
  • 9.2.3. By Country
• 9.3. South America: Country Analysis
  • 9.3.1. Brazil Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.2.1. By Type
      • 9.3.1.2.2. By Application
  • 9.3.2. Argentina Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.2.1. By Type
      • 9.3.2.2.2. By Application
  • 9.3.3. Colombia Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.2.1. By Type
      • 9.3.3.2.2. By Application

10. Middle East and Africa Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook

• 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.1.1. By Value
• 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 10.2.1. By Type
  • 10.2.2. By Application
  • 10.2.3. By Country
• 10.3. MEA: Country Analysis
  • 10.3.1. South Africa Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.2.1. By Type
      • 10.3.1.2.2. By Application
  • 10.3.2. Saudi Arabia Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.2.1. By Type
      • 10.3.2.2.2. By Application
  • 10.3.3. UAE Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.2.1. By Type
      • 10.3.3.2.2. By Application

11. Market Dynamics

• 11.1. Drivers
• 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

• 12.1. Recent Developments
• 12.2. Product Launches
• 12.3. Mergers & Acquisitions

13. Global Biological Molluscicides Market: SWOT Analysis

14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

• 14.1. Competition in the Industry
• 14.2. Potential of New Entrants
• 14.3. Power of Suppliers
• 14.4. Power of Customers
• 14.5. Threat of Substitute Product

15. PESTLE Analysis

16. Competitive Landscape

• 16.1. Lonza Group Ltd.
  • 16.1.1. Business Overview
  • 16.1.2. Company Snapshot
  • 16.1.3. Products & Services
  • 16.1.4. Financials (As Reported)
  • 16.1.5. Recent Developments
• 16.2. Bayer CropScience Limited
• 16.3. AMVAC Chemical Corporation
• 16.4. BASF SE
• 16.5. Adama Agricultural Solutions Ltd
• 16.6. De Sangosse Ltd
• 16.7. Syngenta Crop Protection AG
• 16.8. QINGDAO HISIGMA CHEMICALS CO., LTD
• 16.9. INDUSTRIALCHIMICA S.R.L.
• 16.10. Doff Portland Ltd

17. Strategic Recommendations

18. About Us & Disclaimer