中国のE2E（End-to-End）自動運転産業（2024年～2025年）

E2E自動運転には、グローバル（1段階）とセグメンテッド（2段階）の2種類があります。前者はコンセプトが明確で、後者よりも研究開発コストがはるかに低いです。なぜなら、手作業で注釈を付けたデータセットを必要とせず、Google、META、Alibaba、OpenAIが開発したマルチモーダル基盤モデルに依存しているからです。これらの大手技術企業の肩を持つグローバルE2E自動運転の性能は、セグメンテッドE2E自動運転よりもはるかに優れていますが、搭載コストは極めて高いです。

セグメンテッドE2E自動運転は、知覚に用いる特徴を抽出するために従来のCNNバックボーンネットワークを依然として使用しており、E2Eの経路計画を採用しています。その性能はグローバルE2E自動運転には劣りますが、搭載コストは低いです。しかし、セグメンテッドE2E自動運転の搭載コストは、現在の主流である従来の「BEV+OCC+決定木」ソリューションと比較するとまだ非常に高いです。

世界のE2E自動運転の代表として、Waymo EMMAは、バックボーンネットワークを使用せず、マルチモーダル基盤モデルを中核として動画を直接入力します。UniADはセグメンテッドE2E自動運転の代表です。

E2E自動運転の研究者は、フィードバックが得られるかどうかに基づき、主にCARLAなどのシミュレータで研究を行い、次に計画した指示を実行できるようにするものと、UniADを参考に模倣学習を中心に収集した実データに基づく研究に分かれます。現在、E2E自動運転はオープンループを特徴としており、自分で予測した命令の実行効果を本当に見ることはできません。フィードバックがなければ、オープンループ自動運転の評価は非常に限られたものになります。資料でよく使われている指標としては、L2距離と衝突率の2つがあります。

L2距離：予測された軌跡と真の軌跡の間のL2距離を計算し、予測された軌跡の品質を判断します。

衝突率：予測された軌跡が他の物体と衝突する確率を計算し、予測された軌跡の安全性を評価します。

E2E自動運転でもっとも魅力的なのは、性能向上の可能性です。もっとも早いE2EソリューションはUniADです。2022年末の論文によると、L2距離は1.03メートルもありました。2023年末に0.55メートル、2024年後期に0.22メートルと大幅に短縮されました。Horizon RoboticsはE2E分野でもっとも活発な企業の1つであり、その技術開発もE2E経路の全体的な進化を示しています。UniADが登場した後、Horizon Roboticsは即座にUniADに似たコンセプトでより優れた性能を持つVADを提案しました。その後、Horizon RoboticsはグローバルE2E自動運転に目を向けました。最初の成果はHE-Driverで、これは比較的パラメーター数が多いです。次のSennaはパラメーター数が少なく、E2Eソリューションの中でもっとも性能が高いです。

一部のE2Eシステムの中核は依然としてBEVFormerであり、デフォルトで車両のCANバス情報を使用します。この情報には、車両の速度、加速度、ステアリング角に関する明示的な情報も含まれ、経路計画に大きな影響を与えます。これらのE2Eシステムは、依然として教師あり学習を必要とするため、膨大な手動アノテーションが不可欠であり、データコストが非常に高くなります。さらに、GPTの概念を借用しているのだから、LLMを直接使用するのはどうか。そこでLi AutoはDriveVLMを提案しました。

DriveVLMのシナリオ記述モジュールは、環境記述とキーオブジェクト認識から構成されます。環境記述では、天候や道路状況などの一般的な運転環境に焦点を当てます。キーオブジェクト認識は、現在の運転判断に大きな影響を与えるキーオブジェクトを見つけることです。環境記述には、天候、時間、道路タイプ、車線ラインという4つの部分が含まれます。

当レポートでは、中国のE2E自動運転産業について調査分析し、自動運転技術の概要や開発動向に加え、国内外のサプライヤーの情報を提供しています。

目次

第1章 E2E自動運転技術の基礎

• E2E自動運転の用語と概念
• E2E自動運転のイントロダクションと現状
• 典型的なE2E自動運転の事例
• 基盤モデル
• VLM・VLA
• ワールドモデル
• E2E-AD動作計画モデルの比較
• ELM（Embodied Language Model）

第2章 E2E自動運転の技術ロードマップと開発動向

• E2E自動運転の技術動向
• E2E自動運転の市場動向
• E2E自動運転のチーム構築

第3章 E2E自動運転サプライヤー

• MOMENTA
• DeepRoute.ai
• Huawei
• Horizon Robotics
• Zhuoyu Technology
• NVIDIA
• Bosch
• Baidu
• SenseAuto
• QCraft
• Wayve
• Waymo
• GigaStudio
• LightWheel AI

第4章 OEMのE2E自動運転のレイアウト

• XpengのE2Eインテリジェントドライビングのレイアウト
• Li AutoのE2Eインテリジェントドライビングのレイアウト
• TeslaのE2Eインテリジェントドライビングのレイアウト
• ZeronのE2Eインテリジェントドライビングのレイアウト
• GeelyおよびZEEKRのE2Eインテリジェントドライビングのレイアウト
• Xiaomi AutoのE2Eインテリジェントドライビングのレイアウト
• NIOのE2Eインテリジェントドライビングのレイアウト
• Changan AutomobileのE2Eインテリジェントドライビングのレイアウト
• Mercedes-BenzのE2Eインテリジェントドライビングのレイアウト
• CheryのE2Eインテリジェントドライビングのレイアウト

End-to-end intelligent driving research: How Li Auto becomes a leader from an intelligent driving follower

There are two types of end-to-end autonomous driving: global (one-stage) and segmented (two-stage) types. The former has a clear concept, and much lower R&D cost than the latter, because it does not require any manually annotated data sets but relies on multimodal foundation models developed by Google, META, Alibaba and OpenAI. Standing on the shoulders of these technology giants, the performance of global end-to-end autonomous driving is much better than segmented end-to-end autonomous driving, but at extremely high deployment cost.

Segmented end-to-end autonomous driving still uses the traditional CNN backbone network to extract features for perception, and adopts end-to-end path planning. Although its performance is not as good as global end-to-end autonomous driving, it has lower deployment cost. However, the deployment cost of segmented end-to-end autonomous driving is still very high compared with the current mainstream traditional "BEV+OCC+decision tree" solution.

As a representative of global end-to-end autonomous driving, Waymo EMMA directly inputs videos without a backbone network but with a multimodal foundation model as the core. UniAD is a representative of segmented end-to-end autonomous driving.

Based on whether feedback can be obtained, end-to-end autonomous driving researches are mainly divided into two categories: the research is conducted in simulators such as CARLA, and the next planned instructions can be actually performed; the research based on collected real data, mainly imitation learning, referring to UniAD. End-to-end autonomous driving currently features an open loop, so it is impossible to truly see the effects of the execution of one's own predicted instructions. Without feedback, the evaluation of open-loop autonomous driving is very limited. The two indicators commonly used in documents include L2 distance and collision rate.

L2 distance: The L2 distance between the predicted trajectory and the true trajectory is calculated to judge the quality of the predicted trajectory.

Collision rate: The probability of collision between the predicted trajectory and other objects is calculated to evaluate the safety of the predicted trajectory.

The most attractive thing about end-to-end autonomous driving is the potential for performance improvement. The earliest end-to-end solution is UniAD. A paper at the end of 2022 revealed that the L2 distance was as long as 1.03 meters. It was greatly reduced to 0.55 meters at the end of 2023 and further to 0.22 meters in late 2024. Horizon Robotics is one of the most active companies in the end-to-end field, and its technology development also shows the overall evolution of the end-to-end route. After UniAD came out, Horizon Robotics immediately proposed VAD whose concept is similar to that of UniAD with much better performance. Then, Horizon Robotics turned to global end-to-end autonomous driving. Its first result was HE-Driver, which had a relatively large number of parameters. The following Senna has a smaller number of parameters and is also one of the best-performing end-to-end solutions.

The core of some end-to-end systems is still BEVFormer which uses vehicle CAN bus information by default, including explicit information related to the vehicle's speed, acceleration and steering angle, exerting a significant impact on path planning. These end-to-end systems still require supervised training, so massive manual annotations are indispensable, which makes the data cost very high. Furthermore, since the concept of GPT is borrowed, why not use LLM directly? In this case, Li Auto proposed DriveVLM.

The scenario description module of DriveVLM is composed of environment description and key object recognition. Environment description focuses on common driving environments such as weather and road conditions. Key object recognition is to find key objects that have a greater impact on current driving decision. Environment description includes the following four parts: weather, time, road type, and lane line.

Differing from the traditional autonomous driving perception module that detects all objects, DriveVLM focuses on recognizing key objects in the current driving scenario that are most likely to affect autonomous driving decision, because detecting all objects will consume enormous computing power. Thanks to the pre-training of the massive autonomous driving data accumulated by Li Auto and the open source foundation model, VLM can better detect key long-tail objects, such as road debris or unusual animals, than traditional 3D object detectors.

For each key object, DriveVLM will output its semantic category (c) and the corresponding 2D object box (b) respectively. Pre-training comes from the field of NLP foundation models, because NLP uses very little annotated data and is very expensive. Pre-training first uses massive unannotated data for training to find language structure features, and then takes prompts as labels to solve specific downstream tasks by fine-tuning.

DriveVLM completely abandons the traditional algorithm BEVFormer as the core but adopts large multimodal models. Li Auto's DriveVLM leverages Alibaba's foundation model Qwen-VL with up to 9.7 billion parameters, 448*448 input resolution, and NVIDIA Orin for inference operations.

How does Li Auto transform from a high-level intelligent driving follower into a leader?

At the beginning of 2023, Li Auto was still a laggard in the NOA arena. It began to devote itself to R&D of high-level autonomous driving in 2023, accomplished multiple NOA version upgrades in 2024, and launched all-scenario autonomous driving from parking space to parking space in late November 2024, thus becoming a leader in mass production of high-level intelligent driving (NOA).

Reviewing the development history of Li Auto's end-to-end intelligent driving, in addition to the data from its own hundreds of thousands of users, it also partnered with a number of partners on R&D of end-to-end models. DriveVLM is the result of the cooperation between Li Auto and Tsinghua University.

In addition to DriveVLM, Li Auto also launched STR2 with Shanghai Qi Zhi Institute, Fudan University, etc., proposed DriveDreamer4D with GigaStudio, the Institute of Automation of Chinese Academy of Sciences, and unveiled MoE with Tsinghua University.

Mixture of Experts (MoE) Architecture

In order to solve the problem of too many parameters and too much calculation in foundation models, Li Auto has cooperated with Tsinghua University to adopt MoE Architecture. Mixture of Experts (MoE) is an integrated learning method that combines multiple specialized sub-models (i.e. "experts") to form a complete model. Each "expert" makes contributions in the field in which it is good at. The mechanism that determines which "expert" participates in answering a specific question is called a "gated network". Each expert model can focus on solving a specific sub-problem, and the overall model can achieve better performance in complex tasks. MoE is suitable for processing considerable datasets and can effectively cope with the challenges of massive data and complex features. That's because it can handle different sub-tasks in parallel, make full use of computing resources, and improve the training and reasoning efficiency of models.

STR2 Path Planner

STR2 is a motion planning solution based on Vision Transformer (ViT) and MoE. It was developed by Li Auto and researchers from Shanghai Qi Zhi Research Institute, Fudan University and other universities and institutions.

STR2 is designed specifically for the autonomous driving field to improve generalization capabilities in complex and rare traffic conditions.

STR2 is an advanced motion planner that enables deep learning and effective planning of complex traffic environments by combining a Vision Transformer (ViT) encoder and MoE causal transformer architecture.

The core idea of STR2 is to wield MoE to handle modality collapse and reward balance through expert routing during training, thereby improving the model's generalization capabilities in unknown or rare situations.

DriveDreamer4D World Model

In late October 2024, GigaStudio teamed up with the Institute of Automation of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Li Auto, Peking University, Technical University of Munich and other units to propose DriveDreamer4D.

DriveDreamer4D uses a world model as a data engine to synthesize new trajectory videos (e.g., lane change) based on real-world driving data.

DriveDreamer4D can also provide rich and diverse perspective data (lane change, acceleration and deceleration, etc.) for driving scenarios to increase closed-loop simulation capabilities in dynamic driving scenarios.

The overall structure diagram is shown in the figure. The novel trajectory generation module (NTGM) adjusts the original trajectory actions, such as steering angle and speed, to generate new trajectories. These new trajectories provide a new perspective for extracting structured information (e.g., vehicle 3D boxes and background lane line details).

Subsequently, based on the video generation capabilities of the world model and the structured information obtained by updating the trajectories, videos of new trajectories can be synthesized. Finally, the original trajectory videos are combined with the new trajectory videos to optimize the 4DGS model.

Table of Contents

1. Foundation of End-to-end Autonomous Driving Technology

• 1.1 Terminology and Concept of End-to-end Autonomous Driving
• 1.2 Introduction to and Status Quo of End-to-end Autonomous Driving
• Background of End-to-end Autonomous Driving
• Reason for End-to-end Autonomous Driving: Business Value
• Difference between End-to-end Architecture and Traditional Architecture (1)
• Difference between End-to-end Architecture and Traditional Architecture (2)
• End-to-end Architecture Evolution
• Progress in End-to-end Intelligent Driving (1)
• Progress in End-to-end Intelligent Driving (2)
• Comparison between One-stage and Two-stage End-to-end Autonomous Driving
• Mainstream One-stage/Segmented End-to-end System Performance Parameters
• Significance of Introducing Multi-modal models to End-to-end Autonomous Driving
• Problems and Solutions for End-to-end Mass Production (1)
• Problems and Solutions for End-to-end Mass Production (2)
• Progress and Challenges in End-to-end Systems
• 1.3 Classic End-to-end Autonomous Driving Cases
• SenseTime UniAD
• Technical Principle and Architecture of SenseTime UniAD
• Technical Principle and Architecture of Horizon Robotics VAD
• Technical Principle and Architecture of Horizon Robotics VADv2
• VADv2 Training
• Technical Principle and Architecture of DriveVLM
• Li Auto Adopts MoE
• MoE and STR2
• E2E-AD Model: SGADS
• E2E Active Learning Case: ActiveAD
• End-to-end Autonomous Driving System Based on Foundation Models
• 1.4 Foundation Models
  • 1.4.1 Introduction
• Core of End-to-end System - Foundation Models
• Foundation Models (1) - Large Language Models: Examples of Applications in Autonomous Driving
• Foundation Models (2) - Vision Foundation (1)
• Foundation Models (2) - Vision Foundation (2)
• Foundation Models (2) - Vision Foundation (3)
• Foundation Models (2) - Vision Foundation (4)
• Foundation Models (3) - Multimodal Foundation Models (1)
• Foundation Models (3) - Multimodal Foundation Models (2)
• 1.4.2 Foundation Models: Multimodal Foundation Models
• Development of and Introduction to Multimodal Foundation Models
• Multimodal Foundation Models VS Single-modal Foundation Models (1)
• Multimodal Foundation Models VS Single-modal Foundation Models (2)
• Technology Panorama of Multimodal Foundation Models
• Multimodal Information Representation
• 1.4.3 Foundation Models: Multimodal Large Language Models
• Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)
• Architecture and Core Components of MLLMs
• MLLMs - Mainstream Models
• Application of MLLMs in Autonomous Driving
• 1.5 VLM & VLA
• Application of Vision-Language Models (VLMs)
• Development History of VLMs
• Architecture of VLMs
• Application Principle of VLMs in End-to-end Autonomous Driving
• Application of VLMs in End-to-end Autonomous Driving
• VLM->VLA
• VLA Models
• VLA Principle
• Classification of VLA Models
• Core Functions of End-to-end Multimodal Model for Autonomous Driving (EMMA)
• 1.6 World Models
• Definition and Application
• Basic Architecture
• Generation of Virtual Training Data
• Tesla's World Model
• Nvidia
• InfinityDrive: Breaking Time Limits in Driving World Models
• 1.7 Comparison between E2E-AD Motion Planning Models
• Comparison between Several Classical Models in Industry and Academia
• Tesla: Perception and Decision Full Stack Integrated Model
• Momenta: End-to-end Planning Architecture Based on BEV Space
• Horizon Robotics 2023: End-to-end Planning Architecture Based on BEV Space
• DriveIRL: End-to-end Planning Architecture Based on BEV Space
• GenAD: Generative End-to-end Model
• 1.8 Embodied Language Models (ELMs)
• ELMs Accelerate the Implementation of End-to-end Solutions
• Application Scenarios
• Limitations and Positive Impacts

2 Technology Roadmap and Development Trends of End-to-end Autonomous Driving

• 2.1 Technology Trends of End-to-end Autonomous Driving
• Trend 1
• Trend 2
• Trend 3
• Trend 4
• Trend 5
• Trend 6
• Trend 7
• 2.2 Market Trends of End-to-end Autonomous Driving
• Layout of Mainstream End-to-end System Solutions
• Comparison of End-to-end System Solution Layout between Tier 1 Suppliers (1)
• Comparison of End-to-end System Solution Layout between Tier 1 Suppliers (2)
• Comparison of End-to-end System Solution Layout between Other Autonomous Driving Companies
• Comparison of End-to-end System Solution Layout between OEMs (1)
• Comparison of End-to-end System Solution Layout between OEMs (2)
• Comparison of NOA and End-to-end Implementation Schedules between Sub-brands of Domestic Mainstream OEMs (1)
• Comparison of NOA and End-to-end Implementation Schedules between Sub-brands of Domestic Mainstream OEMs (2)
• Comparison of NOA and End-to-end Implementation Schedules between Sub-brands of Domestic Mainstream OEMs (3)
• Comparison of NOA and End-to-end Implementation Schedules between Sub-brands of Domestic Mainstream OEMs (4)
• 2.3 End-to-end Autonomous Driving Team Building
• Impacts of End-to-end Foundation Models on Organizational Structure (1)
• Impacts of End-to-end Foundation Models on Organizational Structure (2)
• End-to-end Autonomous Driving Team Building of Domestic OEMs (1)
• End-to-end Autonomous Driving Team Building of Domestic OEMs (2)
• End-to-end Autonomous Driving Team Building of Domestic OEMs (3)
• End-to-end Autonomous Driving Team Building of Domestic OEMs (4)
• End-to-end Autonomous Driving Team Building of Domestic OEMs (5)
• End-to-end Autonomous Driving Team Building of Domestic OEMs (6)
• End-to-end Autonomous Driving Team Building of Domestic OEMs (7)
• Team Building of End-to-end Autonomous Driving Suppliers (1)
• Team Building of End-to-end Autonomous Driving Suppliers (2)
• Team Building of End-to-end Autonomous Driving Suppliers (3)
• Team Building of End-to-end Autonomous Driving Suppliers (4)

3. End-to-end Autonomous Driving Suppliers

• 3.1 MOMENTA
• Profile
• One-stage End-to-end Solutions (1)
• One-stage End-to-end Solutions (2)
• End-to-end Planning Architecture
• One-stage End-to-end Mass Production Empowers the Large-scale Implementation of NOA in Mapless Cities
• High-level Intelligent Driving and End-to-end Mass Production Customers
• 3.2 DeepRoute.ai
• Product Layout and Strategic Deployment
• End-to-end Layout
• Difference between End-to-end Solutions and Traditional Solutions
• Implementation Progress in End-to-end Solutions
• End-to-end VLA Model Analysis
• Designated End-to-end Mass Production Projects and VLA Model Features
• Hierarchical Prompt Tokens
• End-to-end Training Solutions
• Application Value of DINOv2 in the Field of Computer Vision
• Autonomous Driving VQA Task Evaluation Data Sets
• Score Comparison between HoP and Huawei
• 3.3 Huawei
• Development History of Huawei's Intelligent Automotive Solution Business Unit
• End-to-end Concept and Perception Algorithm of ADS
• ADS 3.0 (1)
• ADS 3.0 (2): End-to-end
• ADS 3.0 (3): ASD 3.0 VS. ASD 2.0
• End-to-end Solution Application Cases of ADS 3.0 (1)
• End-to-end Solution Application Cases of ADS 3.0 (2)
• End-to-end Solution Application Cases of ADS 3.0 (3)
• End-to-end Autonomous Driving Solutions of Multimodal LLMs
• End-to-end Testing-VQA Tasks
• Architecture of DriveGPT4
• End-to-end Training Solution Examples
• The Training of DriveGPT4 Is Divided Into Two Stages
• Comparison between DriveGPT4 and GPT4V
• 3.4 Horizon Robotics
• Profile
• Main Partners
• End-to-end Super Drive and Its Advantages
• Architecture and Technical Principle of Super Drive
• Journey 6 and Horizon SuperDrive(TM) All-scenario Intelligent Driving Solution
• Senna Intelligent Driving System (Foundation Model + End-to-end)
• Core Technology and Training Method of Senna
• Core Module of Senna
• 3.5 Zhuoyu Technology
• Profile
• R&D and Production
• Two-stage End-to-end Parsing
• One-stage Explainable End-to-end Parsing
• End-to-end Mass Production Customers
• 3.6 NVIDIA
• Profile
• Autonomous driving solution
• DRIVE Thor
• Basic Platform for Autonomous Driving
• Next-generation Automotive Computing Platform
• Latest End-to-end Autonomous Driving Framework: Hydra-MDP
• Self-developed Model Architecture
• 3.7 Bosch
• Intelligent Driving China Strategic Layout (1)
• Based on the End-to-end Development Trend, Bosch Intelligent Driving initiates the Organizational Structure Reform
• Intelligent Driving Algorithm Evolution Planning
• 3.8 Baidu
• Profile of Apollo
• Strategic Layout in the Field of Intelligent Driving
• Two-stage End-to-end
• Production Models Based on Two-stage End-to-end Technology Architecture
• Baidu Auto Cloud 3.0 Enables End-to-end Systems from Three Aspects
• 3.9 SenseAuto
• Profile
• UniAD End-to-end Solution
• DriveAGI: The Next-generation Autonomous Driving Foundation Model and Its Advantages
• DiFSD: SenseAuto's End-to-end Autonomous Driving System That Simulates Human Driving Behavior
• DiFSD: Technical Interpretation
• 3.10 QCraft
• Profile
• "Driven-by-QCraft" High-level Intelligent Driving Solution
• End-to-end Layout
• Advantages of End-to-end Layout
• 3.11 Wayve
• Profile
• Advantages of AV 2.0
• GAIA-1 World Model - Architecture
• GAIA-1 World Model - Token
• GAIA-1 World Model - Generation Effect
• LINGO-2
• 3.12 Waymo
• End-to-end Multimodal Model for Autonomous Driving (EMMA)
• EMMA Analysis: Multimodal Input
• EMMA Analysis: Defining Driving Tasks as Visual Q&A
• EMMA Analysis: Introducing Thinking Chain Reasoning to Enhance Interpretability
• Limitations of EMMA
• 3.13 GigaStudio
• Introduction
• DriveDreamer
• DriveDreamer 2
• DriveDreamer4D
• 3.14 LightWheel AI
• Profile
• Core Technology
• Core Technology Stack
• Data Annotation and Synthetic Data

4. End-to-end Autonomous Driving Layout of OEMs

• 4.1 Xpeng's End-to-end Intelligent Driving Layout
• End-to-end System (1): Architecture
• End-to-end System (2): Intelligent Driving Model
• End-to-end System (3): AI+XNGP
• End-to-End System (4): Organizational Transformation
• Data Collection, Annotation and Training
• 4.2 Li Auto's End-to-end Intelligent Driving Layout
• End-to-end Solutions (1)
• End-to-end Solutions (2)
• End-to-end Solutions (3)
• End-to-end Solutions (4)
• End-to-end Solutions (5)
• End-to-end Solutions (6)
• End-to-end Solutions: L3 Autonomous Driving
• End-to-end Solutions: Building of a Complete Foundation Model
• Technical Layout: Data Closed Loop
• 4.3 Tesla's End-to-end Intelligent Driving Layout
• Interpretation of the 2024 AI Conference
• Development History of AD Algorithms
• End-to-end Process 2023-2024
• Development History of AD Algorithms (1)
• Development History of AD Algorithms (2)
• Development History of AD Algorithms (3)
• Development History of AD Algorithms (4)
• Development History of AD Algorithms (5)
• Tesla: Core Elements of the Full-stack Perception and Decision Integrated Model
• "End-to-end" Algorithms
• World Models
• Data Engines
• Dojo Supercomputing Center
• 4.4 Zeron's End-to-end Intelligent Driving Layout
• Profile
• End-to-end Autonomous Driving System Based on Foundation Models (1)
• End-to-end Autonomous Driving System Based on Foundation Models (2) - Data Training
• Advantages of End-to-end Driving System
• 4.5 Geely & ZEEKR's End-to-end Intelligent Driving Layout
• Geely's ADAS Technology Layout: Geely Xingrui Intelligent Computing Center (1)
• Geely's ADAS Technology Layout: Geely Xingrui Intelligent Computing Center (2)
• Geely's ADAS Technology Layout: Geely Xingrui Intelligent Computing Center (3)
• Xingrui AI foundation model
• Application of Geely's Intelligent Driving Foundation Model Technology
• ZEEKR's End-to-end System: Two-stage Solution
• ZEEKR Officially Released End-to-end Plus
• ZEEKR's End-to-end Plus
• Examples of Models with ZEEKR's End-to-end System
• 4.6 Xiaomi Auto's End-to-end Intelligent Driving Layout
• Profile
• End-to-end Technology Enables All-scenario Intelligent Driving from Parking Spaces to Parking Spaces
• Road Foundation Models Build HD Maps through Road Topology
• New-generation HAD Accesses End-to-end System
• End-to-end Technology Route
• 4.7 NIO's End-to-end Intelligent Driving Layout
• Intelligent Driving R&D Team Reorganization with an Organizational Structure Oriented Towards End-to-end System
• From Modeling to End-to-end, World Models Are the Next
• World Model End-to-end System
• Intelligent Driving Architecture: NADArch 2.0
• End-to-end R&D Tool Chain
• Imagination, Reconstruction and Group Intelligence of World Models
• NSim
• Software and Hardware Synergy Capabilities Continue to Strengthen, Moving towards the End-to-end System Era
• 4.8 Changan Automobile's End-to-end Intelligent Driving Layout
• Brand Layout
• End-to-end System (1)
• End-to-end System (2)
• Production Models with End-to-end System
• 4.9 Mercedes-Benz's End-to-end Intelligent Driving Layout
• Brand New "Vision-only Solutions without Maps, L2++ All-scenario High-level Intelligent Driving Functions"
• Brand New Self-developed MB.OS
• Cooperation with Momenta
• 4.10 Chery's End-to-end Intelligent Driving Layout
• Profile of ZDRIVE.AI
• Chery's End-to-end System Development Planning