連邦政府エッジコンピューティング市場- 世界の産業規模、シェア、動向、機会、予測、展開タイプ別、コンポーネント別、エンドユーザー別、地域別、競合別、2019年～2029年

連邦政府エッジコンピューティングの世界市場は、2023年に6億8,323万米ドルと評価され、2029年までのCAGRは12.57%で、2029年には13億9,013万米ドルに達すると予測されています。

連邦政府エッジコンピューティングとは、中央集中型のクラウドデータセンターだけに依存するのではなく、連邦機関や政府機関内のデータソースにより近い場所に計算リソースを配置することを指します。このアプローチにより、ローカル・サーバ、デバイス、地域データ・センターなど、ネットワークの「エッジ」でのリアルタイムのデータ処理と分析が可能になります。連邦政府エッジコンピューティング市場は、いくつかの促進要因によって大きく成長すると予想されます。第一に、IoTデバイス、監視システム、防衛センサーによって生成されるデータ量の増加により、業務効率と意思決定を強化するための迅速な処理能力が必要とされています。エッジコンピューティングは、より発生源に近い場所でデータを処理することで待ち時間を短縮し、これは国家安全保障、緊急対応、公共安全における一刻を争うアプリケーションにとって極めて重要です。サイバーセキュリティの脅威の高まりと、厳格なデータプライバシー対策の必要性から、連邦政府機関は、局所的なデータ管理を提供し、潜在的な侵害にさらされる機会を減らすエッジコンピューティングソリューションの採用を余儀なくされています。連邦政府機関がインフラストラクチャの近代化を図り、AIや機械学習などの先進技術を統合しようとする中、エッジコンピューティングはこれらのイノベーションをサポートするスケーラブルで柔軟なソリューションを提供します。スマートシティや高度な交通管理システムの採用が拡大していることも、市場の成長に寄与しています。これらのアプリケーションでは、エッジコンピューティングが提供できる効率的なデータ処理とリアルタイムの分析が求められるからです。中央集権型データセンターへの依存を減らし、災害復旧と事業継続の必要性を高める動きは、ハイブリッド型およびオンプレミス型のエッジコンピューティング・ソリューションの採用を後押ししています。連邦政府予算が近代化と技術アップグレードに資金を配分し続ける中、エッジコンピューティング市場は、連邦政府業務特有のニーズに合わせたハードウェア、ソフトウェア、ネットワーク技術の進歩に支えられ、拡大が見込まれています。全体として、より高速で、より安全で、より回復力のあるデータ処理ソリューションへの需要に後押しされ、これらの要因が収束することで、連邦政府エッジコンピューティング市場は力強い成長軌道に乗ると思われます。

市場促進要因

データ量の増加と複雑化

セキュリティおよびプライバシー要件の強化

先進技術の採用

連邦インフラの近代化

主な市場課題

セキュリティとコンプライアンスのリスク

既存インフラとの統合

コストとリソース管理

主な市場動向

モノのインターネット統合の拡大

人工知能と機械学習の重視

データ主権とプライバシーへの注目の高まり

目次

第1章 概要

第2章 調査手法

第3章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第4章 顧客の声

第5章 世界の連邦政府エッジコンピューティング市場概要

第6章 世界の連邦政府エッジコンピューティング市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
  • 金額別
• 市場シェア・予測
  • 展開タイプ別（オンプレミス、クラウドベース、ハイブリッド）
  • コンポーネント別（ハードウェア、ソフトウェア、サービス）
  • エンドユーザー別（連邦政府機関、防衛請負業者、公共安全組織）
  • 地域別（北米、欧州、南米、中東・アフリカ、アジア太平洋）
• 企業別（2023年）
• 市場マップ

第7章 北米の連邦政府エッジコンピューティング市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
  • 金額別
• 市場シェア・予測
  • 展開タイプ別
  • コンポーネント別
  • エンドユーザー別
  • 国別
• 北米：国別分析
  • 米国
  • カナダ
  • メキシコ

第8章 欧州の連邦政府エッジコンピューティング市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
  • 金額別
• 市場シェア・予測
  • 展開タイプ別
  • コンポーネント別
  • エンドユーザー別
  • 国別
• 欧州：国別分析
  • ドイツ
  • フランス
  • 英国
  • イタリア
  • スペイン
  • ベルギー

第9章 アジア太平洋の連邦政府エッジコンピューティング市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
  • 金額別
• 市場シェア・予測
  • 展開タイプ別
  • コンポーネント別
  • エンドユーザー別
  • 国別
• アジア太平洋地域：国別分析
  • 中国
  • インド
  • 日本
  • 韓国
  • オーストラリア
  • インドネシア
  • ベトナム

第10章 南米の連邦政府エッジコンピューティング市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
  • 金額別
• 市場シェア・予測
  • 展開タイプ別
  • コンポーネント別
  • エンドユーザー別
  • 国別
• 南米：国別分析
  • ブラジル
  • コロンビア
  • アルゼンチン
  • チリ

第11章 中東・アフリカの連邦政府エッジコンピューティング市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
  • 金額別
• 市場シェア・予測
  • 展開タイプ別
  • コンポーネント別
  • エンドユーザー別
  • 国別
• 中東・アフリカ：国別分析
  • サウジアラビア
  • アラブ首長国連邦
  • 南アフリカ
  • トルコ
  • イスラエル

第12章 市場力学

• 促進要因
• 課題

第13章 市場動向と発展

第14章 企業プロファイル

• Cisco Systems, Inc.
• Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
• Dell Technologies, Inc.
• IBM Corporation
• Microsoft Corporation
• Intel Corporation
• Oracle Corporation
• Amazon.com, Inc.
• Qualcomm Incorporated
• Juniper Networks, Inc.
• NVIDIA Corporation
• Arista Networks, Inc.

第15章 戦略的提言

第16章 調査会社について・免責事項

The Global Federal Edge Computing Market was valued at USD 683.23 million in 2023 and is expected to reach USD 1390.13 million by 2029 with a CAGR of 12.57% through 2029.

Federal edge computing refers to the deployment of computational resources closer to data sources within federal agencies and government entities, rather than relying solely on centralized cloud data centers. This approach enables real-time data processing and analysis at the "edge" of the network, such as within local servers, devices, or regional data centers. The federal edge computing market is anticipated to rise significantly due to several driving factors. First, the increasing volume of data generated by IoT devices, surveillance systems, and defense sensors necessitates rapid processing capabilities to enhance operational efficiency and decision-making. Edge computing reduces latency by processing data closer to its source, which is crucial for time-sensitive applications in national security, emergency response, and public safety. The rise in cyber security threats and the need for stringent data privacy measures compel federal agencies to adopt edge computing solutions that offer localized data management and reduce exposure to potential breaches. As agencies seek to modernize infrastructure and integrate advanced technologies like AI and machine learning, edge computing provides a scalable and flexible solution that supports these innovations. The growing adoption of smart cities and advanced traffic management systems also contributes to market growth, as these applications require efficient data handling and real-time analytics that edge computing can deliver. The push towards reducing reliance on centralized data centers and the need for disaster recovery and business continuity drive the adoption of hybrid and on-premises edge computing solutions. As federal budgets continue to allocate funds towards modernization and technology upgrades, the edge computing market is expected to expand, supported by advancements in hardware, software, and networking technologies tailored to the specific needs of federal operations. Overall, the convergence of these factors will fuel a robust growth trajectory for the federal edge computing market, driven by the demand for faster, more secure, and resilient data processing solutions.

Key Market Drivers

Increasing Data Volume and Complexity

The Federal Edge Computing Market is significantly driven by the exponential growth in data volume and complexity generated by modern technologies and connected devices. Federal agencies, which encompass a wide range of operations from national security to public safety, are increasingly reliant on a vast array of data sources, including Internet of Things devices, surveillance systems, and advanced sensors. These sources continuously generate large volumes of data that need to be processed, analyzed, and acted upon in real-time. Traditional centralized cloud computing models struggle to keep pace with the latency and bandwidth challenges associated with this surge in data. Edge computing addresses these challenges by processing data closer to its source, thereby reducing latency and enhancing the speed and efficiency of data handling. This localized processing capability allows for quicker decision-making and response times, which are crucial for mission-critical applications such as emergency response, defense operations, and intelligence gathering. As the volume and complexity of data continue to escalate, the demand for edge computing solutions that can handle these requirements efficiently is expected to drive significant growth in the Federal Edge Computing Market.

Enhanced Security and Privacy Requirements

Another key driver of the Federal Edge Computing Market is the heightened focus on security and privacy within federal operations. As cyber threats become more sophisticated and pervasive, protecting sensitive data has become a paramount concern for government agencies. Edge computing offers several advantages in this regard by enabling data to be processed and stored locally, thereby reducing the amount of data transmitted across potentially vulnerable networks. This localized approach mitigates the risks associated with data breaches and unauthorized access, as sensitive information does not need to traverse the public internet or be centralized in a single location. Edge computing supports advanced security measures, such as real-time threat detection and response, by analyzing data at the edge where it is generated. This enhances the ability to identify and address security threats swiftly, reducing the potential impact of cyber attacks. With the increasing emphasis on safeguarding classified and personal information, federal agencies are increasingly adopting edge computing solutions to bolster their security posture, thus driving market growth.

Adoption of Advanced Technologies

The integration of advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and automation, is another significant driver of the Federal Edge Computing Market. These technologies require substantial computational power and data processing capabilities to function effectively. Edge computing provides the necessary infrastructure to support these advanced technologies by enabling localized data processing and analytics. For instance, artificial intelligence algorithms and machine learning models can be deployed at the edge to analyze data in real-time, enhancing the capabilities of federal applications such as predictive maintenance, threat detection, and decision support systems. By leveraging edge computing, federal agencies can achieve greater efficiency and performance in deploying and managing these advanced technologies. The ability to process and analyze data at the edge allows for more sophisticated and responsive applications, which is essential for modernizing federal operations and improving service delivery. As the adoption of these advanced technologies continues to accelerate, the Federal Edge Computing Market is expected to experience substantial growth driven by the need to support and enhance these innovations.

Modernization of Federal Infrastructure

The ongoing modernization of federal infrastructure is a critical factor driving the Federal Edge Computing Market. Federal agencies are undertaking extensive efforts to upgrade their technological infrastructure to improve efficiency, performance, and adaptability in response to evolving operational demands. Edge computing plays a pivotal role in this modernization by providing a flexible and scalable solution that can be integrated into existing systems and networks. This modernization effort includes transitioning from traditional centralized data centers to more decentralized and agile computing models that can better support the diverse and dynamic needs of federal operations. Edge computing facilitates this transition by enabling more efficient data management and processing capabilities, supporting a range of applications from smart cities to advanced defense systems. The drive towards modernization often involves adopting hybrid and multi-cloud environments, where edge computing complements cloud services by addressing latency and bandwidth challenges. As federal agencies continue to invest in infrastructure upgrades and seek to enhance their technological capabilities, the demand for edge computing solutions is expected to grow, further fueling the expansion of the Federal Edge Computing Market. For FY 2025, the United States government focuses on modernizing federal IT policies and technologies to better serve the American people. Technology plays a critical role in supporting the federal government and its workforce. The budget allocates key investments to safeguard federal systems from security threats, utilizing digital identity and AI technologies, while addressing the associated risks to rights, opportunities, and safety, and setting new security standards for software and the cloud. To further support IT modernization, the budget includes an additional USD 75 million for the Technology Modernization Fund (TMF), an innovative program that provides agencies with additional resources to quickly deliver services to the public. TMF currently manages over USD 750 million across 48 projects in 27 federal agencies and is uniquely positioned to make a significant impact on the government's ability to provide excellent, equitable, and secure services.

Key Market Challenges

Security and Compliance Risks

One of the primary challenges facing the Federal Edge Computing Market is ensuring robust security and compliance amidst the distributed nature of edge computing environments. Unlike traditional centralized data centers, edge computing involves the deployment of computational resources across various locations, often in less secure or controlled environments. This decentralization introduces multiple vulnerabilities that can be exploited by malicious actors. Each edge node becomes a potential entry point for cyber attacks, which can compromise sensitive federal data or disrupt critical operations. Ensuring compliance with stringent federal regulations, such as the Federal Information Security Management Act and the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program, becomes more complex in a distributed setting. These regulations mandate rigorous security controls, data protection measures, and regular audits, which must be uniformly implemented across all edge nodes. The challenge lies in maintaining a consistent security posture and ensuring that all edge devices adhere to compliance requirements, especially when they are spread across diverse and potentially unsecured locations. Addressing these security and compliance challenges requires advanced encryption techniques, comprehensive monitoring solutions, and a cohesive strategy for managing vulnerabilities across the entire edge network. As federal agencies increasingly adopt edge computing, they must navigate these complexities to protect sensitive information and maintain regulatory compliance, which is critical for the integrity and security of federal operations.

Integration with Existing Infrastructure

Another significant challenge in the Federal Edge Computing Market is integrating edge computing solutions with existing federal infrastructure. Many federal agencies operate with legacy systems and outdated technologies that were not designed to interface with modern edge computing platforms. This disparity creates substantial technical and operational hurdles. Integrating edge computing requires seamless interoperability between new edge devices and traditional infrastructure, which often involves complex system upgrades and significant modifications to existing IT architectures. The process of integrating edge computing solutions must address issues such as data synchronization, network compatibility, and system interoperability to ensure that edge nodes can effectively communicate and operate within the broader federal technology ecosystem. This integration challenge also encompasses the need to manage and coordinate between various edge computing solutions and existing cloud services, ensuring that data flows smoothly and processes are harmonized across platforms. Overcoming these integration challenges requires a strategic approach that involves thorough planning, technical expertise, and potentially substantial investment in upgrading or replacing legacy systems. Successfully navigating this challenge is crucial for maximizing the benefits of edge computing and ensuring that federal agencies can leverage its capabilities without disrupting existing operations or compromising system performance.

Cost and Resource Management

Managing the cost and resources associated with deploying and maintaining edge computing infrastructure presents another critical challenge in the Federal Edge Computing Market. The implementation of edge computing involves significant initial investments in hardware, software, and network infrastructure. Federal agencies must allocate funds for acquiring edge devices, establishing local data processing capabilities, and deploying necessary security measures. There are ongoing costs related to maintenance, updates, and the management of distributed edge nodes, which can strain federal budgets. Efficiently managing these costs requires careful planning and resource allocation to ensure that investments align with strategic goals and deliver the anticipated benefits. Edge computing solutions often necessitate specialized skills and expertise for deployment, management, and troubleshooting, further adding to the resource requirements. Training personnel or hiring experts to handle edge computing operations is an additional cost that agencies must consider. Balancing these financial and resource demands while ensuring the effective deployment and operation of edge computing solutions can be challenging. To address this challenge, federal agencies need to develop comprehensive cost management strategies, explore potential funding opportunities, and seek out innovative solutions that offer cost-effective and scalable edge computing capabilities. By effectively managing costs and resources, agencies can optimize their edge computing investments and achieve the desired outcomes without overspending or resource constraints.

Key Market Trends

Expansion of Internet of Things Integration

The integration of Internet of Things devices is a prominent trend shaping the Federal Edge Computing Market. As federal agencies increasingly deploy IoT sensors and devices for applications such as surveillance, environmental monitoring, and asset tracking, the need for edge computing solutions has intensified. These IoT devices generate vast amounts of data that require real-time processing to be useful. Edge computing addresses this requirement by processing data locally at the edge of the network, reducing latency and minimizing the need for data to travel to centralized cloud servers. This local processing capability enhances the efficiency and responsiveness of IoT applications, making it possible for federal agencies to achieve real-time insights and take immediate action. The proliferation of IoT devices contributes to the growth of edge computing infrastructure as agencies seek to handle the increased data loads generated by these devices effectively. The trend towards greater IoT integration highlights the critical role of edge computing in managing and analyzing data in dynamic, distributed environments, ultimately driving innovation and improving operational effectiveness in federal operations.

Emphasis on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

The rising emphasis on artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies is significantly influencing the Federal Edge Computing Market. Edge computing provides a robust platform for deploying AI and machine learning algorithms that require substantial computational resources and low-latency data processing. By processing data locally at the edge, federal agencies can leverage AI and machine learning to enhance capabilities such as predictive maintenance, automated threat detection, and real-time analytics. These advanced technologies benefit from the proximity to data sources that edge computing offers, enabling more accurate and timely insights. The ability to execute complex AI models at the edge reduces the dependency on centralized cloud services and alleviates bandwidth constraints associated with transmitting large volumes of data. This trend reflects the growing integration of intelligent technologies into edge computing frameworks, enhancing the ability of federal agencies to utilize advanced analytics and automation to drive operational efficiencies and strategic decision-making.

Increasing Focus on Data Sovereignty and Privacy

The increasing focus on data sovereignty and privacy is driving significant developments in the Federal Edge Computing Market. As data privacy regulations become more stringent, federal agencies are prioritizing solutions that ensure data is processed and stored in compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. Edge computing supports this trend by allowing data to be processed locally rather than transmitted to distant cloud servers, thus helping to maintain control over data and ensure it remains within jurisdictional boundaries. This localized approach is particularly important for sensitive or classified information, where adherence to data sovereignty laws and privacy regulations is critical. By deploying edge computing solutions, federal agencies can better manage data residency and adhere to privacy standards, reducing the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. The emphasis on data sovereignty and privacy reflects a growing recognition of the need to safeguard sensitive information and comply with evolving regulatory frameworks, driving the adoption of edge computing technologies that align with these priorities.

Segmental Insights

Component Insights

The hardware segment emerged as the dominant force within the Federal Edge Computing Market in 2023 and is anticipated to retain its leading position throughout the forecast period. The hardware segment encompasses the physical components essential for deploying edge computing solutions, including edge servers, routers, storage devices, and sensors. These components form the backbone of edge computing infrastructure, providing the necessary computational power, connectivity, and data storage capabilities required to process and analyze data locally. The growing adoption of edge computing by federal agencies, driven by the need for real-time data processing and enhanced operational efficiency, has led to increased investments in robust and high-performance hardware. This segment's dominance is largely attributed to the critical role that hardware plays in enabling edge computing functionalities, such as low-latency processing and local data management. Federal agencies are investing significantly in advanced hardware to support a wide range of applications, from surveillance and security to smart infrastructure and emergency response systems. As edge computing continues to evolve, the demand for cutting-edge hardware solutions, including high-capacity servers and specialized networking equipment, is expected to grow, further solidifying the hardware segment's prominence.

The ongoing advancements in hardware technology, such as the development of more powerful and energy-efficient edge devices, contribute to the segment's sustained leadership. While software and services segments also play crucial roles in the overall edge computing ecosystem, hardware remains the foundation upon which these solutions are built and deployed. As a result, the hardware segment is projected to maintain its dominance in the Federal Edge Computing Market, driven by its fundamental importance in enabling and supporting edge computing capabilities.

Regional Insights

North America emerged as the dominant region in the Federal Edge Computing Market in 2023 and is expected to sustain its leading position throughout the forecast period. The dominance of North America, particularly the United States, can be attributed to several key factors. The region boasts a highly developed technological infrastructure and is home to numerous federal agencies and defense contractors that are early adopters of cutting-edge technologies, including edge computing. The significant investments made by the United States government in modernizing its IT infrastructure, improving data processing capabilities, and enhancing national security contribute to the robust growth of edge computing solutions in the region. North America benefits from a favorable business environment with supportive government policies and substantial funding for research and development, which drive innovation and adoption of advanced technologies. The presence of leading technology providers and a highly skilled workforce further bolster the region's edge computing capabilities, making it a hub for technological advancements. The region's strong emphasis on security, data privacy, and real-time data processing aligns with the core benefits of edge computing, reinforcing its prominence in the market. As North America continues to lead in technological advancements and investment in federal modernization projects, it is well-positioned to maintain its dominance in the Federal Edge Computing Market during the forecast period.

Key Market Players

• Cisco Systems, Inc.
• Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
• Dell Technologies, Inc.
• IBM Corporation
• Microsoft Corporation
• Intel Corporation
• Oracle Corporation
• Amazon.com, Inc.
• Qualcomm Incorporated
• Juniper Networks, Inc.
• NVIDIA Corporation
• Arista Networks, Inc.

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Federal Edge Computing Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Federal Edge Computing Market, By Deployment Type:

• On-premises
• Cloud-based
• Hybrid

Federal Edge Computing Market, By Component:

• Hardware
• Software
• Services

Federal Edge Computing Market, By End User:

• Federal Agencies
• Defense Contractors
• Public Safety Organizations

Federal Edge Computing Market, By Region:

• North America
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Mexico
• Europe
  • Germany
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Italy
  • Spain
  • Belgium
• Asia Pacific
  • China
  • India
  • Japan
  • South Korea
  • Australia
  • Indonesia
  • Vietnam
• South America
  • Brazil
  • Colombia
  • Argentina
  • Chile
• Middle East & Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE
  • South Africa
  • Turkey
  • Israel

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Federal Edge Computing Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Federal Edge Computing Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

• Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

• 1.1. Market Definition
• 1.2. Scope of the Market
  • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
  • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
  • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Objective of the Study
• 2.2. Baseline Methodology
• 2.3. Formulation of the Scope
• 2.4. Assumptions and Limitations
• 2.5. Sources of Research
  • 2.5.1. Secondary Research
  • 2.5.2. Primary Research
• 2.6. Approach for the Market Study
  • 2.6.1. The Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.6.2. The Top-Down Approach
• 2.7. Methodology Followed for Calculation of Market Size & Market Shares
• 2.8. Forecasting Methodology
  • 2.8.1. Data Triangulation & Validation

3. Executive Summary

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Federal Edge Computing Market Overview

6. Global Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook

• 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 6.1.1. By Value
• 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 6.2.1. By Deployment Type (On-premises, Cloud-based, Hybrid)
  • 6.2.2. By Component (Hardware, Software, Services)
  • 6.2.3. By End User (Federal Agencies, Defense Contractors, Public Safety Organizations)
  • 6.2.4. By Region (North America, Europe, South America, Middle East & Africa, Asia Pacific)
• 6.3. By Company (2023)
• 6.4. Market Map

7. North America Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook

• 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.1.1. By Value
• 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 7.2.1. By Deployment Type
  • 7.2.2. By Component
  • 7.2.3. By End User
  • 7.2.4. By Country
• 7.3. North America: Country Analysis
  • 7.3.1. United States Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 7.3.1.2.2. By Component
      • 7.3.1.2.3. By End User
  • 7.3.2. Canada Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 7.3.2.2.2. By Component
      • 7.3.2.2.3. By End User
  • 7.3.3. Mexico Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 7.3.3.2.2. By Component
      • 7.3.3.2.3. By End User

8. Europe Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook

• 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.1.1. By Value
• 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 8.2.1. By Deployment Type
  • 8.2.2. By Component
  • 8.2.3. By End User
  • 8.2.4. By Country
• 8.3. Europe: Country Analysis
  • 8.3.1. Germany Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 8.3.1.2.2. By Component
      • 8.3.1.2.3. By End User
  • 8.3.2. France Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 8.3.2.2.2. By Component
      • 8.3.2.2.3. By End User
  • 8.3.3. United Kingdom Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 8.3.3.2.2. By Component
      • 8.3.3.2.3. By End User
  • 8.3.4. Italy Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 8.3.4.2.2. By Component
      • 8.3.4.2.3. By End User
  • 8.3.5. Spain Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 8.3.5.2.2. By Component
      • 8.3.5.2.3. By End User
  • 8.3.6. Belgium Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.6.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.6.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.6.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.6.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 8.3.6.2.2. By Component
      • 8.3.6.2.3. By End User

9. Asia Pacific Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook

• 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.1.1. By Value
• 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 9.2.1. By Deployment Type
  • 9.2.2. By Component
  • 9.2.3. By End User
  • 9.2.4. By Country
• 9.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
  • 9.3.1. China Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 9.3.1.2.2. By Component
      • 9.3.1.2.3. By End User
  • 9.3.2. India Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 9.3.2.2.2. By Component
      • 9.3.2.2.3. By End User
  • 9.3.3. Japan Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 9.3.3.2.2. By Component
      • 9.3.3.2.3. By End User
  • 9.3.4. South Korea Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 9.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.4.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 9.3.4.2.2. By Component
      • 9.3.4.2.3. By End User
  • 9.3.5. Australia Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 9.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.5.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 9.3.5.2.2. By Component
      • 9.3.5.2.3. By End User
  • 9.3.6. Indonesia Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 9.3.6.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.6.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.6.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.6.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 9.3.6.2.2. By Component
      • 9.3.6.2.3. By End User
  • 9.3.7. Vietnam Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 9.3.7.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.7.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.7.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.7.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 9.3.7.2.2. By Component
      • 9.3.7.2.3. By End User

10. South America Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook

• 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.1.1. By Value
• 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 10.2.1. By Deployment Type
  • 10.2.2. By Component
  • 10.2.3. By End User
  • 10.2.4. By Country
• 10.3. South America: Country Analysis
  • 10.3.1. Brazil Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 10.3.1.2.2. By Component
      • 10.3.1.2.3. By End User
  • 10.3.2. Colombia Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 10.3.2.2.2. By Component
      • 10.3.2.2.3. By End User
  • 10.3.3. Argentina Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 10.3.3.2.2. By Component
      • 10.3.3.2.3. By End User
  • 10.3.4. Chile Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 10.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.4.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 10.3.4.2.2. By Component
      • 10.3.4.2.3. By End User

11. Middle East & Africa Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook

• 11.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 11.1.1. By Value
• 11.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 11.2.1. By Deployment Type
  • 11.2.2. By Component
  • 11.2.3. By End User
  • 11.2.4. By Country
• 11.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
  • 11.3.1. Saudi Arabia Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 11.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 11.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 11.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 11.3.1.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 11.3.1.2.2. By Component
      • 11.3.1.2.3. By End User
  • 11.3.2. UAE Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 11.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 11.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 11.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 11.3.2.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 11.3.2.2.2. By Component
      • 11.3.2.2.3. By End User
  • 11.3.3. South Africa Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 11.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 11.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 11.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 11.3.3.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 11.3.3.2.2. By Component
      • 11.3.3.2.3. By End User
  • 11.3.4. Turkey Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 11.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 11.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 11.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 11.3.4.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 11.3.4.2.2. By Component
      • 11.3.4.2.3. By End User
  • 11.3.5. Israel Federal Edge Computing Market Outlook
    • 11.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 11.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 11.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 11.3.5.2.1. By Deployment Type
      • 11.3.5.2.2. By Component
      • 11.3.5.2.3. By End User

12. Market Dynamics

• 12.1. Drivers
• 12.2. Challenges

13. Market Trends and Developments

14. Company Profiles

• 14.1. Cisco Systems, Inc.
  • 14.1.1. Business Overview
  • 14.1.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 14.1.3. Recent Developments
  • 14.1.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 14.1.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 14.2. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
  • 14.2.1. Business Overview
  • 14.2.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 14.2.3. Recent Developments
  • 14.2.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 14.2.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 14.3. Dell Technologies, Inc.
  • 14.3.1. Business Overview
  • 14.3.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 14.3.3. Recent Developments
  • 14.3.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 14.3.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 14.4. IBM Corporation
  • 14.4.1. Business Overview
  • 14.4.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 14.4.3. Recent Developments
  • 14.4.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 14.4.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 14.5. Microsoft Corporation
  • 14.5.1. Business Overview
  • 14.5.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 14.5.3. Recent Developments
  • 14.5.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 14.5.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 14.6. Intel Corporation
  • 14.6.1. Business Overview
  • 14.6.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 14.6.3. Recent Developments
  • 14.6.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 14.6.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 14.7. Oracle Corporation
  • 14.7.1. Business Overview
  • 14.7.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 14.7.3. Recent Developments
  • 14.7.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 14.7.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 14.8. Amazon.com, Inc.
  • 14.8.1. Business Overview
  • 14.8.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 14.8.3. Recent Developments
  • 14.8.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 14.8.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 14.9. Qualcomm Incorporated
  • 14.9.1. Business Overview
  • 14.9.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 14.9.3. Recent Developments
  • 14.9.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 14.9.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 14.10. Juniper Networks, Inc.
  • 14.10.1. Business Overview
  • 14.10.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 14.10.3. Recent Developments
  • 14.10.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 14.10.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 14.11. NVIDIA Corporation
  • 14.11.1. Business Overview
  • 14.11.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 14.11.3. Recent Developments
  • 14.11.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 14.11.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 14.12. Arista Networks, Inc.
  • 14.12.1. Business Overview
  • 14.12.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 14.12.3. Recent Developments
  • 14.12.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 14.12.5. Key Product/Services Offered

15. Strategic Recommendations

16. About Us & Disclaimer