![]() |
市場調査レポート
商品コード
1804502
ゼロトラストセキュリティベンダー市場:提供製品別、認証タイプ別、アクセスタイプ別、展開モデル別、用途別、組織規模別、業界別-2025年~2030年の世界予測Zero Trust Security Vendor Market by Offerings, Authentication Type, Access Type, Deployment Model, Applications, Organization Size, Industry Verticals - Global Forecast 2025-2030 |
||||||
カスタマイズ可能
適宜更新あり
|
ゼロトラストセキュリティベンダー市場:提供製品別、認証タイプ別、アクセスタイプ別、展開モデル別、用途別、組織規模別、業界別-2025年~2030年の世界予測 |
出版日: 2025年08月28日
発行: 360iResearch
ページ情報: 英文 188 Pages
納期: 即日から翌営業日
|
ゼロトラストセキュリティベンダー市場は、2024年には385億9,000万米ドルとなり、2025年には444億5,000万米ドル、CAGR15.42%で成長し、2030年には912億5,000万米ドルに達すると予測されています。
主な市場の統計 | |
---|---|
基準年2024 | 385億9,000万米ドル |
推定年2025 | 444億5,000万米ドル |
予測年2030 | 912億5,000万米ドル |
CAGR(%) | 15.42% |
今日の組織は、ますます複雑化するデジタル環境に直面しており、従来のセキュリティ境界線では、機敏で巧妙な脅威に対してもはや十分ではありません。サイバー敵対者はネットワーク内の横移動の機会を悪用するため、重要な資産を保護するための根本的に異なるアプローチが緊急に必要であることを強調しています。ゼロ・トラスト・セキュリティの導入には、出所に関係なくすべてのアクセス要求を継続的に検証し、リソースをセグメント化し、すべてのユーザーとデバイスに最小特権ポリシーを適用することが必要です。
サイバーセキュリティの状況は、デジタル変革、クラウドへの移行、リモートワーク環境の普及によって激変しています。組織はますますレガシーVPNソリューションを放棄し、ゼロトラストの原則に沿ったID中心の条件付きアクセスモデルを採用するようになっています。ワークロードがパブリック・クラウド、プライベート・データ・センター、エッジ・ロケーションに分散しているため、セキュリティ・チームはネットワークの境界を超えた全体的なフレームワークを採用する必要があります。
2025年の米国の新関税導入は、特にハードウェアのサプライチェーンとサービス提供モデルにおいて、ゼロ・トラスト・セキュリティ・エコシステムに大きな影響を及ぼしています。ネットワーク・デバイスとセキュリティ・ゲートウェイに対する関税の引き上げにより、ベンダーは調達戦略の再調整、関税免除地域への生産シフト、サプライヤー契約の再交渉を余儀なくされています。このような調整により、調達サイクル全体が影響を受け、企業はセキュリティの有効性を損なうことなく、よりコスト効率の高い選択肢を模索せざるを得なくなりました。
さまざまなセグメンテーションの視点からゼロトラスト市場を分析すると、多様な組織要件に合わせたソリューションを提供する絶好の機会が見えてくる。提供サービスは、ネットワーク機器やセキュリティ・ゲートウェイなどのハードウェア・コンポーネントから、コンサルティング、実装、サポート・保守などのプロフェッショナル・サービスまで多岐にわたる。ソフトウェア機能は、データの暗号化および保護から、IDおよびアクセス管理、セキュリティ分析、脅威インテリジェンスまで多岐にわたる。
ゼロトラストの採用戦略と投資の優先順位を形成する上で、地域ごとのダイナミクスが極めて重要な役割を果たします。南北アメリカでは、企業が積極的なクラウド近代化イニシアティブと強固な規制フレームワークでリードし、条件付きアクセスや最小特権適用の早期導入を推進しています。一方、欧州、中東・アフリカの成熟度はさまざまで、金融サービスや政府部門は、厳しいデータプライバシー規制や進化する脅威のランドスケープに対処するためにゼロトラストの義務化を支持しています。
ゼロ・トラスト・セキュリティの主要ベンダーは、アイデンティティ中心のセキュリティ要件の全領域に対応する統合プラットフォームを提供するために、競争戦略に磨きをかけています。著名な企業は、ID・アクセス管理、クラウド・ワークロード保護、セキュリティ分析における能力を強化するため、的を絞った買収を進めています。また、ハイパースケールクラウドプロバイダーと戦略的提携を結び、ゼロトラスト制御をクラウド環境に直接組み込むことで、導入と管理を簡素化しています。
業界のリーダーは、ゼロトラストの導入に段階的なアプローチを採用し、重要な高価値資産から始めて、より広範なインフラを包含するように拡大する必要があります。最初に、組織は包括的なアイデンティティとアクセスの評価を実施してベースラインを確立し、その後、マイクロセグメンテーション制御と継続的監視ソリューションを展開して、リアルタイムで異常を検出して分離する必要があります。
この調査は、サイバーセキュリティの専門家への定性インタビュー、企業の実務担当者からの1次データ収集、ベンダーの文書、業界標準、規制に関する出版物など広範な2次調査を組み合わせた厳格な調査手法に基づいています。100人以上のCISO、セキュリティアーキテクト、IT運用リーダーと綿密な面談を行い、導入の課題と成功要因に関する生の知見を収集しました。
企業がますます巧妙化するサイバー敵に立ち向かう中、ゼロトラスト・セキュリティはデジタル・レジリエンスを維持するための礎石として浮上しています。IDを中心とした管理、継続的な検証、最小権限の原則を採用することで、企業は侵害のリスクを大幅に低減し、侵入が成功した場合の影響を抑えることができます。ゼロトラストをクラウドの近代化、規制コンプライアンス、脅威インテリジェンスの取り組みと戦略的に連携させることで、その効果はさらに高まります。
The Zero Trust Security Vendor Market was valued at USD 38.59 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 44.45 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 15.42%, reaching USD 91.25 billion by 2030.
KEY MARKET STATISTICS | |
---|---|
Base Year [2024] | USD 38.59 billion |
Estimated Year [2025] | USD 44.45 billion |
Forecast Year [2030] | USD 91.25 billion |
CAGR (%) | 15.42% |
Organizations today face an increasingly complex digital environment where traditional security perimeters no longer suffice against agile, sophisticated threats. Cyber adversaries exploit lateral movement opportunities within networks, underscoring the urgent need for a fundamentally different approach to securing critical assets. Embracing zero trust security requires organizations to continuously verify every access request regardless of origin, segment resources, and enforce least-privilege policies across all users and devices.
By shifting from perimeter-centric defenses to a model that assumes breach by default, enterprises can minimize attack surfaces, prevent unauthorized lateral movement, and stop advanced persistent threats before they compromise sensitive data. This paradigm demands seamless integration of identity verification technologies, adaptive access controls, and real-time analytics to detect anomalies as they arise.
As organizations modernize their IT environments through hybrid cloud deployments and distributed workforces, the zero trust framework provides a cohesive strategy to reconcile security with operational agility. The following analysis explores pivotal industry developments, regulatory influences, segmentation insights, regional dynamics, and actionable recommendations designed to guide decision-makers in deploying resilient zero trust architectures.
The cybersecurity landscape has undergone seismic shifts driven by digital transformation, cloud migration, and the proliferation of remote work environments. Organizations are increasingly abandoning legacy VPN solutions in favor of identity-centric, conditional access models that align with zero trust principles. As workloads disperse across public clouds, private data centers, and edge locations, security teams must adopt holistic frameworks that transcend network boundaries.
Advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning have accelerated the detection of anomalous behavior, enabling more precise threat hunting and automated response. At the same time, the convergence of endpoint protection platforms with cloud-native security services has created unified solutions capable of enforcing granular access policies across diverse environments. These technological breakthroughs are reshaping how enterprises conceptualize security, shifting the focus from perimeter defense to persistent verification.
Simultaneously, regulatory bodies are demanding more stringent controls over data residency, privacy, and breach reporting. Compliance drivers compel organizations to implement robust identity and access management mechanisms, encryption standards, and audit trails-all foundational elements of a successful zero trust deployment. In this evolving context, zero trust is no longer an option but a strategic imperative for maintaining resilience and trust in digital operations.
The introduction of new United States tariffs in 2025 has significantly influenced the zero trust security ecosystem, particularly within hardware supply chains and service delivery models. Increased duties on network devices and security gateways have led vendors to recalibrate sourcing strategies, shift production to tariff-exempt jurisdictions, and renegotiate supplier contracts. These adjustments have, in turn, impacted overall procurement cycles, compelling organizations to seek more cost-efficient alternatives without compromising on security efficacy.
Service providers have responded by bundling consulting and implementation services with on-demand support models to mitigate the budgetary pressures faced by enterprises navigating higher hardware costs. This has accelerated the adoption of subscription-based security offerings, allowing organizations to spread expenses over multi-year contracts while ensuring continued access to critical updates and maintenance.
On the software front, vendors are intensifying investments in cloud-native zero trust solutions that bypass tariff constraints on physical appliances. This strategic pivot not only accelerates time-to-value for customers but also supports scalable deployments across geographically dispersed operations. Ultimately, the 2025 tariffs have catalyzed innovative delivery frameworks and optimized vendor portfolios, laying the groundwork for more resilient, adaptable zero trust implementations.
Analyzing the zero trust market through the lens of various segmentation perspectives reveals robust opportunities to tailor solutions for diverse organizational requirements. Offerings span hardware components such as network devices and security gateways alongside professional services including consulting, implementation, and support and maintenance. Software capabilities range from data encryption and protection to identity and access management, security analytics, and threat intelligence.
When considering authentication types, enterprises increasingly favor multi-factor authentication, whether through biometric solutions or two-factor mechanisms, yet some scenarios still utilize passwordless or single-factor models to balance security and user experience. Access type requirements extend from application access controls to device and network access controls, reflecting the need for context-aware policy enforcement across every touchpoint.
Deployment preferences differ between cloud-based and on-premise models, with hybrid architectures emerging as the norm for organizations seeking flexibility. Zero trust applications encompass access management, data security, endpoint protection, identity verification, and security operations, demonstrating the framework's versatility. Furthermore, requirements vary significantly between large enterprises and smaller mid-market organizations. Industry verticals such as banking, financial services and insurance, education, energy and utilities, government and defense, healthcare, IT and telecommunications, manufacturing, and retail each demand specialized zero trust implementations due to unique regulatory and risk profiles.
Regional dynamics play a pivotal role in shaping zero trust adoption strategies and investment priorities. In the Americas, enterprises lead with aggressive cloud modernization initiatives and robust regulatory frameworks that drive early adoption of conditional access and least-privilege enforcement. Meanwhile, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa exhibit varied maturity levels, with financial services and government sectors championing zero trust mandates to address stringent data privacy regulations and evolving threat landscapes.
Asia-Pacific markets are experiencing rapid growth in zero trust adoption, spurred by burgeoning digital ecosystems and a proliferation of remote workforces. Local governments emphasize strategic cybersecurity directives, mandating comprehensive identity and access management practices, particularly in critical infrastructure and smart city projects. Cross-regional collaboration on threat intelligence sharing and standards development is also gaining momentum, fostering a more unified approach to zero trust frameworks.
This geographic interplay of regulatory drivers, technological investments, and threat sophistication underscores the importance of tailoring zero trust initiatives to regional risk appetites and compliance obligations. Organizations that align strategy with local market nuances will be better positioned to navigate complexities, optimize resource allocation, and achieve sustained security outcomes.
Leading zero trust security vendors are refining their competitive strategies to deliver integrated platforms that address the full spectrum of identity-centric security requirements. Prominent companies are pursuing targeted acquisitions to bolster capabilities in identity and access management, cloud workload protection, and security analytics. They are also forging strategic alliances with hyperscale cloud providers to embed zero trust controls directly within cloud environments, thereby simplifying deployment and management.
Research and development investments are increasingly focused on artificial intelligence-driven behavioral analytics and automated policy orchestration to reduce administrative overhead and accelerate incident response. At the same time, vendors are enhancing user experience through adaptive authentication mechanisms and streamlined access workflows that maintain security without impeding productivity.
Customer success teams are instrumental in translating best practices into actionable blueprints, guiding organizations through pilot programs, phased rollouts, and optimization phases. These collaborative engagements not only reinforce vendor-customer relationships but also generate insights that inform product roadmaps. As market competition intensifies, differentiation will hinge on the ability to deliver compelling value propositions that integrate security, compliance, and operational resilience.
Industry leaders must adopt a phased approach to zero trust implementation, beginning with critical high-value assets and expanding to encompass broader infrastructure. Initially, organizations should conduct comprehensive identity and access assessments to establish a baseline, followed by the deployment of micro segmentation controls and continuous monitoring solutions to detect and isolate anomalies in real time.
Next, aligning executive sponsorship and cross-functional collaboration between security, IT, and business units ensures that zero trust initiatives receive the necessary resources and organizational buy-in. Leaders should also prioritize employee training and awareness programs that emphasize the importance of identity hygiene, secure authentication habits, and prompt incident reporting.
To further mature zero trust capabilities, organizations can integrate advanced machine learning engines with security information and event management systems, enabling predictive threat modeling and automated remediation workflows. Finally, establishing a continuous improvement cycle through periodic policy reviews, red-teaming exercises, and metric-driven performance evaluations will sustain long-term resilience and ensure alignment with evolving risk landscapes.
This research draws upon a rigorous methodology combining qualitative interviews with cybersecurity experts, primary data collection from enterprise practitioners, and extensive secondary research across vendor documentation, industry standards, and regulatory publications. Over one hundred in-depth consultations were conducted with CISOs, security architects, and IT operations leaders to capture firsthand insights on deployment challenges and success factors.
Secondary sources included white papers, technical briefs, and compliance frameworks issued by standards bodies and regulatory agencies. Data from these sources were systematically analyzed to identify recurring themes, best practices, and emerging technology trends. Additionally, publicly available threat intelligence reports and incident case studies were leveraged to validate key assumptions regarding adversary tactics and zero trust efficacy.
The integration of primary and secondary data ensured a holistic perspective on market dynamics, vendor capabilities, and customer requirements. Findings were peer-reviewed by subject matter experts to guarantee accuracy and reliability. This comprehensive approach provides stakeholders with a deep understanding of zero trust security drivers, obstacles, and strategic imperatives.
As enterprises confront increasingly sophisticated cyber adversaries, zero trust security emerges as a cornerstone for sustaining digital resilience. By adopting identity-centric controls, continuous verification, and least-privilege principles, organizations can significantly reduce the risk of breach and limit the impact of successful intrusions. The strategic alignment of zero trust with cloud modernization, regulatory compliance, and threat intelligence initiatives further amplifies its effectiveness.
Looking ahead, the zero trust paradigm will evolve through deeper integration of artificial intelligence, edge computing, and secure access service edge frameworks. These developments will enable even more granular policy enforcement and adaptive risk controls across dispersed environments. For decision-makers, the asynchronous nature of these technological shifts underscores the importance of agility and ongoing investment in security innovation.
In conclusion, zero trust is not a one-time project but a continuous journey toward a more defensible, transparent, and resilient enterprise. Organizations that embrace this evolution will be better positioned to navigate future disruptions while safeguarding critical assets against an ever-changing threat landscape.