![]() |
市場調査レポート
商品コード
1804386
作物における遺伝子編集市場:技術プラットフォーム別、作物タイプ別、送達方法、用途別、エンドユーザー別 - 20251年~2030年の世界予測Gene-Editing in Crops Market by Technology Platform, Crop Type, Delivery Method, Application, End-User - Global Forecast 2025-2030 |
||||||
カスタマイズ可能
適宜更新あり
|
作物における遺伝子編集市場:技術プラットフォーム別、作物タイプ別、送達方法、用途別、エンドユーザー別 - 20251年~2030年の世界予測 |
出版日: 2025年08月28日
発行: 360iResearch
ページ情報: 英文 194 Pages
納期: 即日から翌営業日
|
作物における遺伝子編集市場は、2024年には24億9,000万米ドルとなり、2025年には27億6,000万米ドルで、CAGR11.47%で成長し、2030年までには47億7,000万米ドルに達すると予測されています。
主な市場の統計 | |
---|---|
基準年(2024年) | 24億9,000万米ドル |
推定年(2025年) | 27億6,000万米ドル |
予測年(2030年) | 47億7,000万米ドル |
CAGR(%) | 11.47% |
精密な遺伝子編集技術の出現は、農業科学における極めて重要な瞬間であり、世界的な食糧安全保障の課題に対処する前例のない機会を提供するものです。世界の人口が増え続け、気候がより予測不可能になるにつれ、伝統的な育種方法だけでは、現代社会が求める収量、回復力、栄養の質の急速な向上を実現することはできません。CRISPRベースのシステム、塩基編集、プライム編集などの遺伝子編集プラットフォームは、研究者や開発者が利用できるツールキットを再定義し、主要な作物形質の正確かつ効率的でコスト効率の高い改変を可能にしています。
過去10年間、農業セクターは、分子生物学のブレークスルー、データ解析の進歩、そして規制の優先順位の変化により、一連の変革的シフトを経験してきました。CRISPR-Casツールの急速な改良と次世代編集システムの出現は、新規作物品種の開発ペースを加速させました。これと並行して、より健康的で栄養価の高い農産物に対する消費者の要求が高まっているため、企業はゲノム編集を自社の製品パイプラインに組み込み、ビタミンレベルの向上や風味プロファイルの改善といった形質をターゲットにするようになっています。
2025年、米国による新たな関税措置の導入は、遺伝子組換え種子と関連インプットのグローバルサプライチェーンを再編成する可能性があります。輸入試薬、特殊酵素、カスタムデリバリーシステムに追加関税を課すことで、これらの政策は国内外の利害関係者の研究開発コストを引き上げる可能性があります。その結果、企業は生産拠点、調達戦略、提携契約を見直し、費用の上昇を緩和する可能性があります。
遺伝子編集作物市場は、多角的な分析により、それぞれの価値ドライバーと投資の優先順位に光を当てることができます。技術プラットフォームのレンズを通して見ると、そのスペクトルは塩基編集やプライム編集からCRISPRベースのシステム、メガヌクレアーゼ、部位特異的ヌクレアーゼ、転写活性化因子様エフェクターヌクレアーゼ、ジンクフィンガーヌクレアーゼにまで及び、それぞれが精度とオフターゲットリスク管理においてユニークな利点を提供しています。作物タイプに焦点を移すと、穀類、果実・野菜、豆類・豆類、油糧作物で、収量、病害虫抵抗性、栄養成分を目的とした遺伝子強化にさまざまに反応する、差別化された機会が明らかになります。
各地域の市場力学を見ると、規制アプローチ、調査強度、採用率がそれぞれ異なっていることがわかります。南北アメリカでは、主要市場における民間部門の旺盛な投資と合理化された規制経路により、遺伝子編集作物品種の商業化が加速しています。逆に、欧州、中東・アフリカでは、厳格な安全性評価による慎重な姿勢と、気候変動への耐性を高める形質開発に重点を置く研究ハブにおけるイノベーションのポケットが共存しています。
遺伝子編集作物分野の主要組織は、多様な研究パイプラインと戦略的提携を通じてイノベーションを体現しています。既存の農業バイオテクノロジー企業は、分子育種における数十年の専門知識を活用して遺伝子編集ツールを統合し、形質発見と検証を強化するために専門技術プロバイダーと提携を結んでいます。一方、新興のバイオテクノロジー企業は、栄養価の向上や病原菌に対する次世代抵抗性など、インパクトの大きい用途に重点を置いてニッチを開拓しています。
業界利害関係者は、承認経路を合理化し、費用のかかる遅延を回避するため、研究計画に規制情報を早期に統合することを優先すべきです。政策立案者との関係を築き、透明性の高い安全性の枠組みで足並みを揃えることで、より円滑な市場参入が促進され、社会的信頼が構築されます。さらに、ナノ粒子ベースのシステムやリボ核タンパク質複合体のような、拡張性のあるデリバリープラットフォームに投資することで、実地試験までの時間を短縮し、遺伝子組み換えの精度を高めることができます。
この分析は、一次情報と二次情報を統合した厳密な調査手法に基づいています。ベテラン研究者、規制専門家、業界幹部との専門家インタビューを実施し、技術的実現可能性、政策展開、商業化戦略に関する微妙な視点を捉えました。これらの定性調査結果は、公表された科学文献、特許出願、政府刊行物と体系的に照合し、深さと正確さの両方を確保しました。
本エグゼクティブサマリーは、遺伝子編集作物分野における技術の進歩、規制の変化、関税の影響、戦略的セグメンテーションに関する重要な洞察をまとめたものです。多様な編集プラットフォームが進化しつつある政策フレームワークとどのように融合し、回復力、生産性、栄養価を向上させた作物の開発を加速させているかを浮き彫りにしています。本分析は、南北アメリカにおける強固な民間セクターの関与からアジア太平洋における官民協力モデルまで、採用経路を形成する微妙な地域力学を強調しています。
The Gene-Editing in Crops Market was valued at USD 2.49 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 2.76 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 11.47%, reaching USD 4.77 billion by 2030.
KEY MARKET STATISTICS | |
---|---|
Base Year [2024] | USD 2.49 billion |
Estimated Year [2025] | USD 2.76 billion |
Forecast Year [2030] | USD 4.77 billion |
CAGR (%) | 11.47% |
The emergence of precision gene-editing techniques represents a pivotal moment in agricultural science, offering unprecedented opportunities to address global food security challenges. As the world's population continues to grow and climates become more unpredictable, traditional breeding methods alone cannot deliver the rapid improvements in yield, resilience, and nutritional quality that modern societies demand. Gene-editing platforms such as CRISPR-based systems, base editing, and prime editing are redefining the toolkit available to researchers and developers, enabling precise, efficient, and cost-effective modifications of key crop traits.
Furthermore, regulatory environments are evolving to accommodate these novel technologies, creating a dynamic landscape that balances innovation with safety and public acceptance. Across regions, policymakers are revisiting frameworks to support responsible development, while consumer advocacy groups and industry stakeholders engage in constructive dialogue regarding transparency and labelling. As a result, the pathway to commercial deployment is becoming clearer, yet challenges remain in harmonizing standards and ensuring equitable access to cutting-edge solutions.
This report offers a comprehensive introduction to the latest advancements in crop gene-editing, the transformative shifts underway, the implications of recent tariff policies in the United States, and the strategic segmentation critical for investors and decision-makers. It also provides regional analyses, company profiles, and actionable recommendations designed to empower industry leaders. By weaving together technological, regulatory, and market perspectives, this introduction sets the stage for an in-depth exploration of how gene-editing is poised to revolutionize crop development and sustainability.
Over the past decade, the agricultural sector has undergone a series of transformative shifts driven by breakthroughs in molecular biology, advances in data analytics, and shifting regulatory priorities. The rapid refinement of CRISPR-Cas tools and the emergence of next-generation editing systems have accelerated the pace at which novel crop varieties can be developed. In parallel, rising consumer demand for healthier, more nutritious produce has prompted companies to integrate genome editing into their product pipelines, targeting traits such as enhanced vitamin levels and improved flavor profiles.
Moreover, policy changes in major markets have catalyzed investment and collaboration. Progressive frameworks in certain regions have reduced approval timelines for gene-edited crops, encouraging public-private partnerships and pilot programs that demonstrate real-world benefits. At the same time, environmental imperatives have elevated the importance of drought tolerance and disease resistance, spurring research into gene-enabled solutions that can reduce reliance on agrochemicals and preserve biodiversity.
Consequently, the landscape of crop genetics is evolving from a fragmented array of experimental initiatives toward a cohesive innovation ecosystem. Universities, research institutes, and seed developers are establishing consortiums, sharing best practices, and harmonizing protocols to overcome technical bottlenecks. With these structural changes in place, the stage is set for gene-editing to emerge as a mainstream driver of agricultural productivity and resilience.
In 2025, the introduction of new tariff measures by the United States has the potential to reshape global supply chains for gene-edited seeds and associated inputs. By imposing additional duties on imported reagents, specialized enzymes, and custom delivery systems, these policies may raise the cost of research and development for both domestic and international stakeholders. As a result, companies may reassess production locations, procurement strategies, and partnership agreements to mitigate rising expenses.
The ripple effects extend beyond laboratory budgets. Seed producers that rely on global sourcing of gene-editing components could face extended lead times, prompting strategic stockpiling or the diversification of supplier networks. Similarly, collaborative projects between academic institutions in the United States and technology providers abroad may require renegotiation of terms to address tariff-induced financial uncertainties. In the long term, these shifts may encourage vertical integration, with larger firms pursuing in-house capabilities to reduce exposure to external cost fluctuations.
However, opportunities emerge for domestic manufacturers of reagents and instrumentation, who may experience increased demand as companies seek to localize supply chains. This dynamic could foster innovation in manufacturing processes and drive competitive differentiation through quality, speed, and service. Ultimately, the cumulative impact of tariff policies will hinge on the ability of stakeholders to adapt procurement strategies, invest in supply-chain resilience, and cultivate new partnerships that balance cost and capability.
The gene-editing landscape can be dissected through multiple dimensions of analysis, each shedding light on distinct value drivers and investment priorities. When viewed through the lens of technology platform, the spectrum ranges from base editing and prime editing to CRISPR-based systems, meganucleases, site-directed nucleases, transcription activator-like effector nucleases, and zinc finger nucleases, each offering unique benefits in precision and off-target risk management. Shifting focus to crop type reveals differentiated opportunities across cereal grains, fruits and vegetables, legumes and pulses, and oilseed crops, which respond variably to genetic enhancements aimed at yield, pest resistance, and nutritional content.
Delivery method provides yet another vantage point, encompassing established approaches such as Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and electroporation alongside emerging techniques like gene gun, nanoparticle-based delivery, ribonucleoprotein complexes, and viral vector delivery, each with implications for efficiency, regulatory acceptance, and field performance. Applications of gene editing further refine the narrative, illustrating how traits for disease resistance-spanning bacterial, fungal, and viral challenges-coalesce with drought tolerance, herbicide tolerance, and nutritional enhancement to address both agronomic and consumer needs.
Finally, end-user segmentation brings clarity to commercialization pathways, highlighting the roles of agricultural biotechnology companies, farmers and grower associations, government and regulatory bodies, research institutes and universities, and seed companies in driving adoption. By integrating these segmentation lenses, stakeholders can identify high-value intersections, prioritize R&D investments, and align strategies with end-market demands.
Regional market dynamics reveal a tapestry of divergent regulatory approaches, research intensity, and adoption rates. In the Americas, robust private-sector investment and streamlined regulatory pathways in key markets have accelerated the commercialization of gene-edited crop varieties, while smaller economies in the region continue to establish foundational policies and infrastructure. Conversely, in Europe, Middle East & Africa, a more cautious stance driven by rigorous safety assessments coexists with pockets of innovation in research hubs that focus on trait development for climate resilience.
Transitioning to the Asia-Pacific region, a convergence of governmental support programs, agrarian demographics, and escalating food security pressures has led to an enthusiastic pursuit of gene-editing solutions. National research initiatives and university collaborations are forging public-private partnerships aimed at tailoring innovations to local varietals and environmental conditions. Meanwhile, nascent markets in Southeast Asia are balancing rapid adoption desires with the need to build capacity in regulatory science and biosafety evaluation.
Together, these regional narratives underscore the importance of market-specific strategies in research prioritization, stakeholder engagement, and policy advocacy. Understanding the distinctive currents in each geography enables companies to tailor their approaches, optimize trial frameworks, and navigate complex approval processes with greater confidence.
Leading organizations in the gene-editing crop sector epitomize innovation through diversified research pipelines and strategic collaborations. Established agricultural biotechnology firms are leveraging decades of expertise in molecular breeding to integrate gene-editing tools, forming alliances with specialized technology providers to enhance trait discovery and validation. Meanwhile, emerging biotech startups are carving out niches by focusing on high-impact applications such as enhanced nutritional profiles or next-generation resistance to pathogens.
Partnerships between seed companies and academic institutions have become increasingly common, fostering knowledge exchange and shared access to cutting-edge platforms. This collaborative model accelerates trait commercialization while distributing the risk and cost of early-stage research. Concurrently, technology providers that supply reagents, instrumentation, and bioinformatics services are expanding their portfolios to support end-to-end pipelines, from target identification through regulatory dossier preparation.
Investor interest has also reshaped the competitive landscape, with venture capital and strategic corporate funding driving the emergence of hybrid entities that blend startup agility with institutional resources. Together, these leading players are establishing best practices for intellectual property management, regulatory engagement, and commercialization pathways, laying the groundwork for sustained innovation and market penetration across diverse crop segments.
Industry stakeholders should prioritize the early integration of regulatory intelligence into research planning to streamline approval pathways and avoid costly delays. Cultivating relationships with policy makers and aligning on transparent safety frameworks can facilitate smoother market entry and build public trust. Moreover, investing in scalable delivery platforms-such as nanoparticle-based systems or ribonucleoprotein complexes-can reduce time to field trials and enhance the precision of genetic modifications.
In parallel, companies are advised to develop diversified pipelines that balance high-value, short-term opportunities like herbicide tolerance with longer-term, high-impact traits such as drought resilience and nutritional enhancement. Such dual-track strategies can optimize resource allocation and mitigate the risk of single-product dependencies. Additionally, forging consortiums between seed companies, research institutes, and technology providers can accelerate trait validation and share infrastructure costs, enabling smaller players to compete effectively.
Finally, embracing digital tools for data management and bioinformatics will be critical in extracting maximum value from genotype-phenotype insights. By deploying machine learning algorithms and robust data-analytics platforms, organizations can prioritize candidate edits, predict off-target effects, and refine breeding strategies with greater speed and accuracy. Collectively, these actions will empower leaders to navigate complexity, unlock new growth avenues, and reinforce their competitive edge.
This analysis is grounded in a rigorous research methodology that synthesizes primary insights with secondary data sources. Expert interviews with seasoned researchers, regulatory specialists, and industry executives were conducted to capture nuanced perspectives on technological feasibility, policy evolution, and commercialization strategies. These qualitative findings were systematically triangulated against published scientific literature, patent filings, and government publications to ensure both depth and accuracy.
Secondary research encompassed a comprehensive review of peer-reviewed journals, conference proceedings, and regulatory guidelines from major jurisdictions. Critical data points were validated through cross-referencing multiple credible sources, enabling a holistic understanding of gene-editing platforms and application trends. Information on delivery methods, trait development, and end-user adoption was analyzed to reveal emerging patterns and potential inflection points.
Furthermore, the study incorporated trend analyses of collaborative initiatives, funding flows, and academic-industry partnerships, highlighting the interplay between innovation ecosystems and commercial deployment. By integrating both macro-level observations and granular project-level case studies, the methodology provides a balanced framework for capturing the multifaceted dynamics of crop gene-editing.
This executive summary brings together critical insights across technological advances, regulatory shifts, tariff implications, and strategic segmentation within the gene-editing crop arena. It highlights how diverse editing platforms are converging with evolving policy frameworks to accelerate the development of crops with improved resilience, productivity, and nutritional value. The analysis underscores the nuanced regional dynamics that shape adoption pathways, from the robust private-sector engagement in the Americas to the collaborative public-private models in the Asia-Pacific region.
Key segmentation perspectives offer a roadmap for prioritizing research and commercialization efforts, revealing how technology platforms, crop types, delivery methods, application areas, and end-user profiles intersect to create high-value opportunities. Insights into leading companies illustrate the importance of strategic partnerships, diversified pipelines, and integrated data analytics for sustaining innovation.
By synthesizing these findings, the conclusion affirms that gene-editing is poised to redefine modern agriculture. Stakeholders equipped with a deep understanding of strategic imperatives, regional nuances, and actionable recommendations will be well positioned to capitalize on this transformative wave and contribute to global food security objectives.