米国の低侵襲脊椎インプラント市場：市場規模、シェア、動向分析（2024年～2030年）：MedSuite

米国の低侵襲脊椎インプラントの市場規模は、2023年に23億米ドルに達し、予測期間中に4.6%のCAGRで拡大するとみられ、31億米ドルを超えると予測されています。

低侵襲椎体間固定装置市場では、低侵襲の後方アプローチ（MIPLIF）や経椎体アプローチ（MITLIF）よりも、斜めアプローチ（OLIF）や側方アプローチ（LLIF）による腰椎椎体間固定術への支持が高まっています。この動向は、斜位および側方アプローチに関連する傷害リスクがより低く、より大きな成長が期待できることによる。とはいえ、どの分野も積極的な拡大が見込まれています。

2023年、Globus MedicalはNuVasiveと合併し、米国低侵襲脊椎市場の最前線に躍り出ました。この合併企業は、低侵襲椎体間固定装置部門を支配しただけでなく、低侵襲ペディクルスリュー、棘突起固定、低侵襲インストルメントでも重要なポジションを占めていました。

当レポートでは、米国の低侵襲脊椎インプラント市場について調査し、市場の概要とともに、セグメント別動向、COVID-19の影響分析、市場促進要因および阻害要因、競合市場シェア分析、および市場に参入する企業のプロファイルなどを提供しています。

目次

エグゼクティブサマリー

調査手法

米国の低侵襲脊椎インプラント市場に対するCOVID-19の影響

疾患概要

• 基本的な解剖学
• 病気の治療と診断
• 患者の人口統計

製品評価

• イントロダクション
• 製品ポートフォリオ
• 規制上の問題とリコール
• 臨床試験

米国の低侵襲脊椎インプラント市場概要

• イントロダクション
• 市場概要とトレンド分析
• 促進要因と抑制要因
• 競争市場シェア分析
• 合併と買収
• 企業プロファイル
  • DePuy Synthes
  • Globus Medical/NuVasive
  • Joimax
  • Medtronic
  • SI-BONE
  • Stryker
  • VGI Medical
  • ZimVie
• SWOT分析

低侵襲椎間デバイス市場

低侵襲椎弓根スクリュー市場

棘突起固定市場

低侵襲仙腸関節固定市場

低侵襲脊椎手術器具市場

略語

LIST OF CHARTS

• Chart 1-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S., 2023
• Chart 1-2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Overview, U.S., 2023 & 2030
• Chart 2-1: Multi-Scenario Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Forecast, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
• Chart 5-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030
• Chart 5-2: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2023
• Chart 6-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Chart 7-1: MIS Interbody Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Chart 7-2: Leading Competitors, MIS Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2023
• Chart 8-1: MIS Pedicle Screw Market by Segment, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Chart 8-2: Leading Competitors, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2023
• Chart 9-1: Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
• Chart 9-2: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2023
• Chart 10-1: Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
• Chart 10-2: Leading Competitors, Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2023
• Chart 11-1: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
• Chart 11-2: Leading Competitors, MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2020
• Chart 12-1: Spine Endoscope Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030
• Chart 12-2: Leading Competitors, Spine Endoscope Market, U.S., 2023
• Chart 13-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030

LIST OF FIGURES

• Figure 1-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2023
• Figure 1-2: Companies Researched in This Report
• Figure 1-3: Factors Impacting the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S. (1 of 2)
• Figure 1-4: Factors Impacting the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S. (2 of 2)
• Figure 1-5: Recent Events in the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2020 - 2024
• Figure 1-6: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Procedures Covered
• Figure 1-7: Procedure Codes Investigated
• Figure 1-8: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Markets Covered
• Figure 1-9: Key Report Updates
• Figure 1-10: Version History
• Figure 2-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Worst Case Scenario, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
• Figure 2-2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Base Case Scenario, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
• Figure 2-3: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Best Case Scenario, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
• Figure 4-1: MIS Interbody Devices by Company (1 of 5)
• Figure 4-2: MIS Interbody Devices by Company (2 of 5)
• Figure 4-3: MIS Interbody Devices by Company (3 of 5)
• Figure 4-4: MIS Interbody Devices by Company (4 of 5)
• Figure 4-5: MIS Interbody Devices by Company (5 of 5)
• Figure 4-6: MIS Pedicle Screw by Company (1 of 2)
• Figure 4-7: MIS Pedicle Screw by Company (2 of 2)
• Figure 4-8: Spinous Process Fixation Devices by Company
• Figure 4-9: Facet Fixation Devices by Company
• Figure 4-10: SI Joint Fusion Devices by Company
• Figure 4-11: Spine Endoscopes by Company
• Figure 4-12: Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation by Company
• Figure 4-13: Class 2 Device Recall Catalyft" LS Expandable Interbody System Anterior Standalone Cage
• Figure 4-14: Class 2 Device Recall XCORE 2 Ti Core, Static
• Figure 4-15: Class 2 Device Recall ALTERA Spacer
• Figure 4-16: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker Spine
• Figure 4-17: Class 2 Device Recall Concorde Lift Expandable Interbody Device
• Figure 4-18: Class 2 Device Recall LineSider Spinal System
• Figure 4-19: Class 2 Device Recall Polaris 5.5 Spinal System and Polaris 5.5/Cypher Spinal System
• Figure 4-20: Class 2 Device Recall Vital MIS Spinal Fixation system
• Figure 4-21: Class 2 Device Recall Pass Tulip pedicle screw
• Figure 4-22: Class 2 Device Recall Vital MIS Spinal Fixation system
• Figure 4-23: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Biomet Vitality Spinal Fixation System
• Figure 4-24: MIS-D Versus MIS-TLIF for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
• Figure 4-25: Bio2 Vitrium(R) Cervical Cage in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
• Figure 4-26: Retro-prospective Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of the Stand-alone Cervical Interbody Cage C-CURVE (Peek and Titanium) Manufactured by MEDICREA(R) (C-CURVE)
• Figure 4-27: Prospective Study of Fusion Rates Using Spira-C Device for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery (ACDF)
• Figure 4-28: LLIF Plus Posterior Decompression for Severe Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
• Figure 4-29: SPIRA(TM)-A 3D and HCT/p DBM vs. Medtronic Divergent(TM)-L/Perimeter(TM) and Recombinant BMP-2
• Figure 4-30: Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
• Figure 4-31: Pedicle Screw Fixation in Osteoporotic Lumbar Spine (PSFOLS)
• Figure 4-32: XLIF Decade Plate System Study
• Figure 4-33: Effectiveness and Safety of the Facet Fixation (FFX(R)) Implant in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
• Figure 4-34: Safety and Efficacy Assessment of Using the zLOCK Facet Stabilization System
• Figure 4-35: Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of the FACET FIXation Implant
• Figure 4-36: Percutaneous Screw Fixation vs. Open Fixation in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures (PrecScrew)
• Figure 4-37: iFuse TORQ for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
• Figure 4-38: Post-Market Feasibility Study of the Tenon Medical CATAMARAN(TM) SI Joint Fusion System
• Figure 4-39: Clinical Outcome and Fusion Results Using the SiJoin(R) Transfixing Sacroiliac Fusion Device
• Figure 4-40: Tenon Medical CATAMARAN(TM) SI Joint Fusion System CT Scan Study
• Figure 4-41: Evolusion Study Using the Zyga SImmetry Sacroiliac Joint Fusion System
• Figure 4-42: Treatment of Sacroiliac Dysfunction With SI-LOK(R) Sacroiliac Joint Fixation SI-SI-LOK
• Figure 4-43: The Effect of Mediclore as an Anti-adhesion Agent and Safety in Full-Endoscopic Spine Surgery: a Preliminary Study
• Figure 4-44: Fluorescence Imaging with Indocyanine Green (ICG) in Endoscopic Spinal Surgery
• Figure 5-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
• Figure 5-2: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2023
• Figure 5-3: SWOT Analysis, DePuy Synthes
• Figure 5-4: SWOT Analysis, Globus Medical/NuVasive
• Figure 5-5: SWOT Analysis, Joimax
• Figure 5-6: SWOT Analysis, Medtronic
• Figure 5-7: SWOT Analysis, SI-BONE
• Figure 5-8: SWOT Analysis, Stryker
• Figure 5-9: SWOT Analysis, VGI Medical
• Figure 5-10: SWOT Analysis, ZimVie
• Figure 6-1: Procedure Codes Investigated, U.S., 2023
• Figure 6-2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 6-3: MIS Interbody Device Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 6-4: Total Levels Treated, MIS Interbody Device, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 6-5: Total MIS Interbody Device Procedures, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 6-6: MIPLIF Procedures, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 6-7: MITLIF Procedures, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 6-8: LLIF Procedures, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 6-9: OLIF Procedures, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 6-10: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 6-11: Total Levels Treated, MIS Pedicle Screw, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 6-12: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 6-13: Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 6-14: Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 6-15: Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 6-16: Spinous Process Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 6-17: Facet Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 6-18: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedures, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 6-19: Spine Endoscope Procedures, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 7-1: MIS Interbody Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2023 - 2030 (US$M)
• Figure 7-2: MIS Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 7-3: MIPLIF Market, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 7-4: MITLIF Market, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 7-5: LLIF Market, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 7-6: OLIF Market, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 7-7: Leading Competitors, MIS Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2023
• Figure 8-1: MIS Pedicle Screw Market by Segment, U.S., 2023 - 2030 (US$M)
• Figure 8-2: MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 8-3: Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 8-4: Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 8-5: Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2023 - 2030
• Figure 8-6: Leading Competitors, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2023
• Figure 9-1: Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
• Figure 9-2: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2023
• Figure 10-1: Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
• Figure 10-2: Leading Competitors, Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2023
• Figure 11-1: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
• Figure 11-2: Leading Competitors, MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2023
• Figure 12-1: Spine Endoscope Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 - 2030 (US$M)
• Figure 12-2: Endoscope Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
• Figure 12-3: Spine Endoscope Instrumentation Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
• Figure 12-4: Leading Competitors, Spine Endoscope Market, U.S., 2023
• Figure 13-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, U.S., 2020 - 2030
• Figure 13-2: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, U.S., 2023

Product Description

The US MIS spinal implant market reached a value of $2.3 billion in 2023 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 4.6% to exceed $3.1 billion during the forecast period.

The comprehensive report suite on the U.S. market for minimally invasive spinal (MIS) implants covers various segments, including MIS interbody devices, MIS pedicle screws, spinous process fixation, facet fixation, MIS sacroiliac joint fusion, spine endoscopes, and MIS instrumentation. Despite encountering multiple challenges, growth is anticipated across all market segments. This growth is attributed to steady patient demand driven by demographics and evolving regulations favoring MIS procedures. The reduced recovery time associated with MIS surgeries is also a significant factor influencing the preference for these procedures among patients, hospitals, and surgeons over traditional spine surgeries.

MARKET REPORT DATA TYPES INCLUDED

Unit Sales, Average Selling Prices, Market Value & Growth Trends

Forecasts Until 2030, and Historical Data to 2020

Market Drivers & Limiters for Each Segment

Competitive Analysis with Market Shares for Each Segment

Recent Mergers & Acquisitions

Procedure Volumes

Company Profiles, Product Portfolios and SWOT for Top Competitors

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

U.S. MIS SPINAL IMPLANTS MARKET INSIGHTS

The market for MIS interbody devices is increasingly favoring oblique (OLIF) and lateral (LLIF) lumbar interbody fusion techniques over the minimally invasive posterior (MIPLIF) and transforaminal (MITLIF) approaches. This trend is driven by the lower injury risk associated with the oblique and lateral methods, positioning them for greater growth. Nonetheless, all segments are anticipated to expand positively.

U.S. MIS SPINAL IMPLANTS MARKET SHARE INSIGHTS

In 2023, Globus Medical's merger with NuVasive propelled them to the forefront of the U.S. minimally invasive spine (MIS) market. This combined entity not only dominated the MIS interbody device sector but also held significant positions in MIS pedicle screws, spinous process fixation, and MIS instrumentation. However, NuVasive did not enter the MIS sacroiliac joint fusion and spine endoscope segments.

Medtronic secured the runner-up position in the 2023 U.S. MIS market, showcasing impressive performance across several segments, notably MIS interbody devices, MIS pedicle screws, spinous process fixation, facet fixation, and MIS instrumentation. Unlike its leading competitor, Medtronic also did not venture into the spine endoscope market.

Other key players like DePuy Synthes, Stryker, SI-BONE, Richard Wolf, Joimax, ZimVie, and various smaller entities rounded out the competition. The U.S. MIS market is marked by the presence of numerous smaller companies, with most holding market shares of no more than 2%.

MARKET SEGMENTATION SUMMARY

While this report suite contains all applicable market data, each of the markets are also available as stand alone MedCore reports. This allows you to get access to only the specific market segment research that you need. You can view all these included reports and segmentation here:

MIS Interbody Device Market - MedCore - Segmented by:

Device Type: MIPLIF, LITLIF, LLIF, OLIF.

MIS Pedicle Screw Market - Segmented by:

Device Type: Percutaneous Cannulated, Retractor Cannulated, and Retractor Non-Cannulated.

Spinous Process Fixation Market

Facet Fixation Market

MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market

Spinal Endoscope Market - Segmented by:

Device Type: Endoscope, and Spine Endoscope Instrumentation

MIS Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market

Research Scope Summary

Regions: United States

Base Year: 2023

Forecast: 2024-2030

Historical Data: 2020-2022

Quantitative Coverage: Market Size, Procedure Volume, Market Shares, Market Forecasts, Market Growth Rates, Units Sold, and Average Selling Prices.

Qualitative Coverage: COVID-19 Impact, Market Growth Trends, Market Limiters, Competitive Analysis & SWOT for Top Competitors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Company Profiles, Product Portfolios

Data Sources: Primary Interviews with Industry Leaders, Government Physician Data, Regulatory Data, Hospital Private Data, Import & Export Data, iData Research Internal Database.

TABLE OF CONTENT

TABLE of CONTENTS

List of Figures

List of Charts

executive summary

U.S. Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Overview

Competitive Analysis

Market Trends

Market Developments

Procedures Included

Procedure Codes Investigated

Markets Included

Key Report Updates

Version History

research methodology

• Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
• Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
• Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
• Step 4: Performing Primary Research
• Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
• Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
• Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
• Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
• Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring

impact of covid-19 on THE U.S. Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market

• 2.1 Introduction
• 2.2 Analysis By Market Segment
  • 2.2.1 Worst Case Scenario
  • 2.2.2 Base Case Scenario
  • 2.2.3 Best Case Scenario

Disease overview

• 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.1.1 Degenerative Disc Disease
    • 3.1.1.1 Disc Herniation
    • 3.1.1.2 Stenosis
    • 3.1.1.3 Spondylolisthesis
    • 3.1.1.4 Arthritis
  • 3.1.2 Spinal Deformities
    • 3.1.2.1 Scoliosis
    • 3.1.2.2 Kyphosis and Lordosis
  • 3.1.3 Trauma and Tumor
  • 3.1.4 Vertebral Compression Fractures
    • 3.1.4.1 Osteoporosis
    • 3.1.4.2 Vertebral Compression Fractures
• 3.2 Patient Demographics
  • 3.2.1 Degenerative Disc Disease
  • 3.2.2 Spinal Deformities
  • 3.2.3 Vertebral Compression Fractures

Product Assessment

• 4.1 Introduction
• 4.2 Product Portfolios
  • 4.2.1 MIS Interbody Device
    • 4.2.1.1 Approaches
    • 4.2.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive PLIF
    • 4.2.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive TLIF
    • 4.2.1.1.3 LLIF
    • 4.2.1.1.4 OLIF
  • 4.2.2 MIS Pedicle Screw
  • 4.2.3 Spinous Process Fixation
  • 4.2.4 Facet Fixation
  • 4.2.5 SI Joint Fusion
  • 4.2.6 Spine Endoscope
  • 4.2.7 Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation
• 4.3 Regulatory Issues and Recalls
  • 4.3.1 MIS Interbody Device
  • 4.3.2 MIS Pedicle Screw
  • 4.3.3 Spinous Process Fixation
• 4.4 Clinical Trials
  • 4.4.1 MIS Interbody Devices
  • 4.4.2 MIS Pedicle Screw
  • 4.4.3 Spinous Process Fixation
  • 4.4.4 Facet Fixation
  • 4.4.5 SI Joint Fusion
  • 4.4.6 Spine Endoscopes

U.S. Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Overview

• 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.1.1 Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion
    • 5.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    • 5.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    • 5.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    • 5.1.1.4 Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
  • 5.1.2 Minimally Invasive Surgery Pedicle Screws
    • 5.1.2.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems
    • 5.1.2.2 Retractor-Based MIS Systems
  • 5.1.3 Spinous Process Fixation
  • 5.1.4 Facet Fixation
  • 5.1.5 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
  • 5.1.6 MIS Spine Endoscopes
• 5.2 Market Overview & Trend Analysis
• 5.3 Drivers and Limiters
  • 5.3.1 Market Drivers
  • 5.3.2 Market Limiters
• 5.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis
• 5.5 Mergers and Acquisitions
• 5.6 Company Profiles
  • 5.6.1 DePuy Synthes
  • 5.6.2 Globus Medical/NuVasive
  • 5.6.3 Joimax
  • 5.6.4 Medtronic
  • 5.6.5 SI-BONE
  • 5.6.6 Stryker
  • 5.6.7 VGI Medical
  • 5.6.8 ZimVie
• 5.7 SWOT Analysis
  • 5.7.1 DePuy Synthes
  • 5.7.2 Globus Medical/NuVasive
  • 5.7.3 Joimax
  • 5.7.4 Medtronic
  • 5.7.5 SI-BONE
  • 5.7.6 Stryker
  • 5.7.7 VGI Medical
  • 5.7.8 ZimVie

Procedure Numbers

• 6.1 Introduction
• 6.2 Procedures
  • 6.2.1 Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures
  • 6.2.2 MIS Interbody Device Procedures
    • 6.2.2.1 MIPLIF Procedures
    • 6.2.2.1.1 MIPLIF Procedures by Care Setting
    • 6.2.2.2 MITLIF Procedures
    • 6.2.2.2.1 MITLIF Procedures by Care Setting
    • 6.2.2.3 LLIF Procedures
    • 6.2.2.3.1 LLIF Procedures by Care Setting
    • 6.2.2.4 OLIF Procedures
    • 6.2.2.4.1 OLIF Procedures by Care Setting
  • 6.2.3 MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures
    • 6.2.3.1 Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures
    • 6.2.3.2 Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures
    • 6.2.3.3 Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures
  • 6.2.4 Spinous Process Fixation Procedures
  • 6.2.5 Facet Fixation Procedures
  • 6.2.6 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedures
  • 6.2.7 Spine Endoscope Procedures

MIS Interbody Device Market

• 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.1.1 Approach Types
    • 7.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    • 7.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    • 7.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    • 7.1.1.4 Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion
    • 7.1.1.5 eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion
    • 7.1.1.6 Guided Lateral Interbody Fusion
    • 7.1.1.7 Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion
• 7.2 Market Overview
• 7.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
  • 7.3.1 MIS Interbody Device Market
  • 7.3.2 MIPLIF Market
  • 7.3.3 MITLIF Market
  • 7.3.4 LLIF Market
  • 7.3.5 OLIF Market
• 7.4 Drivers and Limiters
  • 7.4.1 Market Drivers
  • 7.4.2 Market Limiters
• 7.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

MIS Pedicle Screw Market

• 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.1.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems
  • 8.1.2 Retractor-Based MIS Systems
• 8.2 Market Overview
• 8.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
  • 8.3.1 MIS Pedicle Screw Market
  • 8.3.2 Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market
  • 8.3.3 Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market
  • 8.3.4 Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market
• 8.4 Drivers and Limiters
  • 8.4.1 Market Drivers
  • 8.4.2 Market Limiters
• 8.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

spinous process fixation Market

• 9.1 Introduction
• 9.2 Market Analysis and Forecast
• 9.3 Drivers and Limiters
  • 9.3.1 Market Drivers
  • 9.3.2 Market Limiters
• 9.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Facet Fixation Market

• 10.1 Introduction
• 10.2 Market Analysis and Forecast
• 10.3 Drivers and Limiters
  • 10.3.1 Market Drivers
  • 10.3.2 Market Limiters
• 10.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis

MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market

• 11.1 Introduction
• 11.2 Market Analysis and Forecast
• 11.3 Drivers and Limiters
  • 11.3.1 Market Drivers
  • 11.3.2 Market Limiters
• 11.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Spine Endoscope Market

• 12.1 Introduction
• 12.2 Market Overview
• 12.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
  • 12.3.1 Endoscope Market
  • 12.3.2 Spine Endoscope Instrumentation Market
• 12.4 Drivers and Limiters
  • 12.4.1 Market Drivers
  • 12.4.2 Market Limiters
• 12.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Minimally invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market

• 13.1 Introduction
• 13.2 Market Analysis and Forecast
• 13.3 Drivers and Limiters
  • 13.3.1 Market Drivers
  • 13.3.2 Market Limiters
• 13.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Abbreviations