世界のカーボンファーミング市場-2025-2032年

世界のカーボンファーミング市場は、2024年に1億1,336万米ドルに達し、2032年には3,300億1,000万米ドルに達すると予測され、予測期間2025年のCAGRは14.29%で成長します。

カーボンファーミング市場の重要性は、世界人口の増加とそれに伴う食料消費の急増によって高まっており、農業慣行に伴うカーボンフットプリントが大幅に増加しています。農業生産高は現在、世界の温室効果ガス排出量の約11％を占めており、その主な原因は畜産業です。とはいえ、農業は、温室効果ガス問題の一因から解決策の重要な構成要素へと転換する能力を有しています。

カーボンファーミングプログラムは、土壌管理、アグロフォレストリー、強化された家畜・作物システムなど、持続可能な慣行を活用して炭素を固定することを重視しています。この黎明期の市場は、農家、商業セクター、政府から大きな注目を集めており、気候変動への対応における重要性を浮き彫りにしています。

BASFが欧州カーボン・プラス農業連合（European Carbon+Farming Coalition）を共同で設立したことは、持続可能な農業への転換を促進するための農家中心の戦略を浮き彫りにしています。これらの取り組みは、欧州連合のグリーンディールを含む包括的なカーボンニュートラル目標に対応しています。炭素隔離を農業の枠組みに組み込むことは、環境への影響を低減し、食料生産システムの長期的な持続可能性を促進するための実行可能なアプローチを提供します。

ダイナミクス

促進要因1-規制の枠組みと政府の政策

世界各国の政府は、農家に炭素貯留の実施を奨励するため、財政的インセンティブ、補助金、炭素クレジットなどの施策を実施しています。オーストラリアの排出削減基金（ERF）は、持続可能な技術によって温室効果ガスの排出を削減するよう、農業者にインセンティブを与えています。土壌や植物に炭素を固定する取り組みは、炭素クレジットを生成することができ、そのクレジットは金銭的利益と交換することができます。この結果、特に農業分野では、持続可能な農業の経済的実現可能性を実証するために、カーボンファーミングの実践が大幅に採用されました。

欧州では、2023年3月22日に予定されているグリーンクレーム指令のような規制の進展が、市場の堅牢性を高めています。この指令は欧州のグリーンディールと整合性があり、環境主張に対する消費者の信頼を強化し、持続可能な行動を促すことを目的としています。環境主張の証明と透明性を義務付けることで、組織はより持続可能で説明責任のある方法を採用せざるを得なくなり、間接的にカーボンファーミングの発展を促進することになります。

このような支援的な法的枠組みは、経済的なインセンティブを確立するだけでなく、意識と信頼を高め、気候変動と農業の持続可能性に対する不可欠な対応としてカーボンファーミングを促進します。

促進要因2-カーボンオフセット需要

カーボンニュートラルの達成やカーボンフットプリントの削減を目指す企業、政府機関、人々によるカーボンオフセットへの需要の高まり。カーボン・オフセットは、温室効果ガス（GHG）の排出を直接相殺することで、気候変動を緩和する国際的な取り組みにおいて不可欠なメカニズムとして浮上しています。この需要は、企業の持続可能性の目標、法律による義務付け、環境に配慮した製品やサービスを求める消費者の傾向など、複数の変数によって左右されます。

気候変動に対する意識の高まりと規制上の制約が、炭素クレジット市場を後押ししています。これは農家にとって、持続可能な土地管理によって炭素を吸収することで収入を得る市場機会をもたらします。数多くの企業がカーボンニュートラルの達成を誓約し、カーボンオフセットに投資する用意があります。これは、カーボンファーミングの取り組みに従事する農家にとって、大きな市場機会となります。

制約：測定と検証の課題

カーボンファーミングは、農法によって大気中のCO2を隔離し、土壌や植生に保持することを目指しています。しかし、炭素隔離を定量化し検証することは、土壌炭素動態の複雑さ、様々な土壌タイプ、気候条件、農法の影響を受けるため、困難が伴います。

この予測不可能性が、一貫した評価手法の確立を妨げ、費用と労力を増大させています。検証方法の精度、拡張性、費用は、カーボンファーミングイニシアチブの有効性に強く影響します。高騰する費用と可変的な基準は、農家や買い手の炭素クレジットへの投資を抑制する可能性があります。

シアトルにある新興企業Noriは、これらの問題をよく表しています。彼らのマーケットプレースは、農家とカーボン・オフセット購入者を結びつけるが、炭素除去量を正確に評価することが難しいです。ノリは、土壌のばらつきのため、土壌のサンプリングとモデリングで課題に直面しました。科学的な専門家と協力することで、彼らのアプローチは強化されたが、そのプロセスには費用と時間がかかりました。ブロックチェーン技術のようなイノベーションは透明性を向上させたが、ノリが提唱する標準規格は、複雑さを軽減し、カーボンファーミングの取り組みに対する信頼を醸成するために、業界全体の統一が必要であることを強調しました。

目次

第1章 調査手法と調査範囲

第2章 定義と概要

第3章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第4章 市場力学

• 影響要因
  • 促進要因
    • 規制枠組みと政府の政策
    • カーボンオフセットの需要
  • 抑制要因
    • 測定と検証の課題
  • 機会
  • 影響分析

第5章 産業分析

• ポーターのファイブフォース分析
• サプライチェーン分析
• 価格分析
• 規制分析
• DMIの見解

第6章 プロジェクトタイプ別

• 農林業
• バイオチャー
• 森林牧草地
• 土壌炭素隔離
• 植林/再植林

第7章 実用タイプ別

• 保全耕作
• カバークロッピング
• 輪作
• 統合農畜産システム

第8章 最終用途別

• 農家・牧場主
• 法人
• 政府機関
• 非営利団体

第9章 地域別

• 北米
  • 米国
  • カナダ
  • メキシコ
• 欧州
  • ドイツ
  • 英国
  • フランス
  • イタリア
  • スペイン
  • その他欧州地域
• 南米
  • ブラジル
  • アルゼンチン
  • その他南米
• アジア太平洋地域
  • 中国
  • インド
  • 日本
  • オーストラリア
  • その他アジア太平洋地域
• 中東・アフリカ

第10章 競合情勢

• 競合シナリオ
• 市況・シェア分析
• M&A分析

第11章 企業プロファイル

• Vayda
  • 会社概要
  • 製品ポートフォリオと概要
  • 財務概要
  • 主な発展
• Terramera Inc
• Indigo Ag
• Nori
• Soil Capital
• Agoro Carbon Alliance
• Carbon Sequestration Inc.
• Regen Network
• Agreena
• Rabo Carbon Bank

第12章 付録

Global Carbon Farming Market reached US$ 113.36 million in 2024 and is expected to reach US$ 330.01 billion by 2032, growing with a CAGR of 14.29% during the forecast period 2025-2032.

The carbon farming market is becoming more important due to the growing global population and a corresponding surge in food consumption, which has significantly increased the carbon footprint associated with agricultural practices. Agricultural output presently accounts for roughly 11% of global greenhouse gas emissions, with the livestock industry as the predominant source. Nevertheless, agriculture possesses the capacity to shift from contributing to the issue to serving as a crucial component of the solution.

Carbon farming programs emphasize the utilization of sustainable practices, including soil management, agroforestry and enhanced livestock and crop systems, to trap carbon. This nascent market has attracted significant attention from farmers, the commercial sector and governments, highlighting its importance in addressing climate change.

BASF's co-founding of the European Carbon+ Farming Coalition highlights a farmer-centric strategy to expedite the shift towards sustainable agriculture. These efforts correspond with overarching carbon neutrality objectives, including the European Union's Green Deal. Integrating carbon sequestration into agricultural frameworks offers a viable approach to reduce environmental impacts and promote long-term sustainability in food production systems.

Dynamics

Driver 1 - Regulatory frameworks and government policies

Governments worldwide are enacting measures including financial incentives, subsidies and carbon credits to encourage farmers to use carbon sequestration practices. Australia's Emissions Reduction Fund (ERF) incentivizes agriculturalists to diminish greenhouse gas emissions via sustainable techniques. Initiatives that trap carbon in soil or plants can generate carbon credits, which are tradable for financial gain. This has resulted in substantial adoption of carbon farming practices, especially in the agriculture sector, demonstrating the economic feasibility of sustainable farming.

In Europe, regulation advancements like the Green Claims Directive, planned on March 22, 2023, enhance market robustness. The directive is consistent with the European Green Deal, seeking to bolster consumer confidence in environmental assertions and encourage sustainable behavior. Mandating proof and transparency in environmental claims compels organizations to adopt more sustainable and accountable methods, hence indirectly promoting the advancement of carbon farming.

These supportive legislative frameworks not only establish financial incentives but also augment awareness and confidence, promoting carbon farming as an essential response to climate change and agricultural sustainability.

Driver 2 - Carbon offsetting demand

Increasing demand for carbon offsets from corporations, governmental entities and people seeking to attain carbon neutrality or diminish their carbon footprint. Carbon offsets have emerged as an essential mechanism in international initiatives to alleviate climate change by counterbalancing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that cannot be directly eliminated. This demand is influenced by multiple variables, such as corporate sustainability objectives, legislative mandates and consumer inclinations towards ecologically responsible products and services.

The growing awareness of climate change and regulatory restrictions are propelling the market for carbon credits. This presents a market opportunity for farmers to gain income by sequestering carbon via sustainable land management practices. Numerous corporations are pledging to achieve carbon neutrality and are prepared to invest in carbon offsets. This represents a substantial market opportunity for farmers engaged in carbon farming efforts.

Restraint: Measurement and verification challenges

Carbon farming seeks to sequester atmospheric CO2 and retain it in soil and vegetation via agricultural methods. Nonetheless, quantifying and validating carbon sequestration encounters difficulties owing to the intricacies of soil carbon dynamics, which are affected by various soil types, climatic conditions and agricultural methods.

This unpredictability hinders the establishment of consistent assessment methodologies, hence escalating expenses and efforts. The precision, scalability and expense of verification methods strongly influence the efficacy of carbon farming initiatives. Elevated expenses and variable criteria may deter farmers from engaging and buyers from investing in carbon credits.

Nori, a startup located in Seattle, illustrates these problems. Their marketplace links farmers with carbon offset purchasers but encounters difficulties in precisely assessing carbon removal. Nori faced challenges in soil sampling and modeling because of soil variability. Engaging with scientific specialists enhanced their approaches; nonetheless, the process was expensive and time-consuming. Innovations like as blockchain technology improved transparency, while Nori's advocacy for standardized standards underscored the necessity for industry-wide uniformity to diminish complexity and foster trust in carbon farming initiatives.

Segment Analysis

The global carbon farming market is segmented based on project type, practice type, end-user and region.

Silvopasture works as catalyst for carbon sequestration and agricultural sustainability

Silvopasture, an integrated agroforestry approach that amalgamates trees, fodder plants and cattle on the same plot of land, is increasingly recognized for its capacity to absorb carbon, augment soil health and elevate farm output. This method is notably important in the carbon farming sector, providing a comprehensive strategy for climate mitigation and agricultural sustainability.

Research demonstrates that silvopasture systems can store between 1.1 and 4.2 tons of CO2 per hectare each year, contingent upon tree species, climate and management approaches, rendering it a compelling choice for farmers aiming to produce carbon credits.

In the southeastern US, where conventional cattle ranching has encountered soil degradation, water scarcity and diminishing profitability, silvopasture has arisen as a sustainable alternative. Farmers have effectively cultivated fast-growing tree species, such as loblolly pine, in conjunction with grazing grasses and cattle, maximizing both environmental and economic advantages.

Integrated crop-livestock systems (ICLS) are anticipated to experience substantial expansion in the carbon farming sector. These systems integrate plant and animal elements to improve agroecosystem resilience and tackle global food security issues. ICLS can enhance agricultural output, improve nutritional results and promote environmental sustainability, particularly for rural and low-income households, providing enduring advantages for food and nutritional security.

Geographical Penetration

Ambitious climate goals and supportive policies in Europe

The carbon farming industry in Europe is swiftly growing, propelled by the EU's ambitious climate objectives and favorable legislation. Due to heightened awareness and incentives, the market is poised for substantial growth in the forthcoming years. The European Union has implemented various initiatives to promote carbon farming, including the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), Horizon Europe and the LIFE program. These initiatives offer financial incentives and technical assistance to farmers and land managers for the adoption of carbon farming practices.

In April 2024, the European Parliament ratified the Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming (CRCF) Regulation, creating the inaugural EU-wide voluntary framework for certifying carbon removals, carbon farming and carbon storage in products throughout Europe. The CRCF Regulation will promote investment in novel carbon removal technologies and sustainable carbon farming solutions by establishing EU quality criteria and monitoring and reporting methods, while simultaneously addressing greenwashing.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the market include Vayda, Terramera Inc, Indigo Ag, Nori, Soil Capital, Agoro Carbon Alliance, Carbon Sequestration Inc., Regen Network, Agreena and Rabo Carbon Bank.

By Project Type

• Agroforestry
• Biochar
• Silvopasture
• Soil Carbon Sequestration
• Afforestation/ Reforestation

By Practice Type

• Conservation Tillage
• Cover Cropping
• Crop Rotation
• Integrated Crop-livestock Systems

By End-user

• Farmers & Ranchers
• Corporations
• Government Agencies
• Non-profit Organizations

By Region

• North America
• South America
• Europe
• Asia-Pacific
• Middle East and Africa

Key Developments

• In June 2024, Nori introduces an unprecedented quantity of soil carbon removal credits to the marketplace from the Bayer Carbon Program in U.S. Nori announced the release of more than 125,000 regeneration tonnes from the Bayer Carbon Program in U.S. marketplace, representing the greatest single issuance of credits in the company's history. The credits signify an unparalleled augmentation of Nori's carbon removal supply and contribute substantially to the soil organic carbon sector.
• In April 2024, Nori collaborates with Perennial to enhance its carbon credit issuance program and enable new functionalities. Nori, a prominent issuer, registry and market for carbon removal credits, has selected Perennial, a firm specializing in soil carbon standards, tools and technology, to facilitate the development and growth of its soil organic carbon credit issuance program.

Why Purchase the Report?

• To visualize the global carbon farming market segmentation based on project type, practice type, end-user and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
• Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
• Excel data sheet with numerous data points of the carbon farming market with all segments.
• PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
• Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global carbon farming market report would provide approximately 62 tables, 56 figures and 201 pages.

Target Audience 2025

• Manufacturers/ Buyers
• Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
• Research Professionals
• Emerging Companies

Table of Contents

1. Methodology and Scope

• 1.1. Research Methodology
• 1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Snippet by Project Type
• 3.2. Snippet by Practice Type
• 3.3. Snippet by End-user
• 3.4. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

• 4.1. Impacting Factors
  • 4.1.1. Drivers
    • 4.1.1.1. Regulatory frameworks and government policies
    • 4.1.1.2. Carbon offsetting demand
  • 4.1.2. Restraints
    • 4.1.2.1. Measurement and verification challenges
  • 4.1.3. Opportunity
  • 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

• 5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
• 5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
• 5.3. Pricing Analysis
• 5.4. Regulatory Analysis
• 5.5. DMI Opinion

6. By Project Type

• 6.1. Introduction
  • 6.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Project Type
  • 6.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Project Type
• 6.2. Agroforestry*
  • 6.2.1. Introduction
  • 6.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
• 6.3. Biochar
• 6.4. Silvopasture
• 6.5. Soil Carbon Sequestration
• 6.6. Afforestation/ Reforestation

7. By Practice Type

• 7.1. Introduction
  • 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Practice Type
  • 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Practice Type
• 7.2. Conservation Tillage*
  • 7.2.1. Introduction
  • 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
• 7.3. Cover Cropping
• 7.4. Crop Rotation
• 7.5. Integrated Crop-livestock Systems

8. By End-user

• 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user
  • 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By End-user
• 8.2. Farmers & Ranchers*
  • 8.2.1. Introduction
  • 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
• 8.3. Corporations
• 8.4. Government Agencies
• 8.5. Non-profit Organizations

9. By Region

• 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
  • 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
• 9.2. North America
  • 9.2.1. Introduction
  • 9.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
  • 9.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Project Type
  • 9.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Practice Type
  • 9.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user
  • 9.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
    • 9.2.6.1. US
    • 9.2.6.2. Canada
    • 9.2.6.3. Mexico
• 9.3. Europe
  • 9.3.1. Introduction
  • 9.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
  • 9.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Project Type
  • 9.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Practice Type
  • 9.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user
  • 9.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
    • 9.3.6.1. Germany
    • 9.3.6.2. UK
    • 9.3.6.3. France
    • 9.3.6.4. Italy
    • 9.3.6.5. Spain
    • 9.3.6.6. Rest of Europe
• 9.4. South America
  • 9.4.1. Introduction
  • 9.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
  • 9.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Project Type
  • 9.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Practice Type
  • 9.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user
  • 9.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
    • 9.4.6.1. Brazil
    • 9.4.6.2. Argentina
    • 9.4.6.3. Rest of South America
• 9.5. Asia-Pacific
  • 9.5.1. Introduction
  • 9.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
  • 9.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Project Type
  • 9.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Practice Type
  • 9.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user
  • 9.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
    • 9.5.6.1. China
    • 9.5.6.2. India
    • 9.5.6.3. Japan
    • 9.5.6.4. Australia
    • 9.5.6.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
• 9.6. Middle East and Africa
  • 9.6.1. Introduction
  • 9.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
  • 9.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Project Type
  • 9.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Practice Type
  • 9.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user

10. Competitive Landscape

• 10.1. Competitive Scenario
• 10.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
• 10.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

11. Company Profiles

• 11.1. Vayda*
  • 11.1.1. Company Overview
  • 11.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
  • 11.1.3. Financial Overview
  • 11.1.4. Key Developments
• 11.2. Terramera Inc
• 11.3. Indigo Ag
• 11.4. Nori
• 11.5. Soil Capital
• 11.6. Agoro Carbon Alliance
• 11.7. Carbon Sequestration Inc.
• 11.8. Regen Network
• 11.9. Agreena
• 11.10. Rabo Carbon Bank

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

12. Appendix

• 12.1. About Us and Services
• 12.2. Contact Us