デフォルト表紙
市場調査レポート
商品コード
1447980

農業用界面活性剤市場 2023年~2030年

Agricultural Surfactants Market - 2023-2030

出版日: | 発行: DataM Intelligence | ページ情報: 英文 186 Pages | 納期: 約2営業日

● お客様のご希望に応じて、既存データの加工や未掲載情報(例:国別セグメント)の追加などの対応が可能です。  詳細はお問い合わせください。

価格
価格表記: USDを日本円(税抜)に換算
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=157.90円
農業用界面活性剤市場 2023年~2030年
出版日: 2024年03月08日
発行: DataM Intelligence
ページ情報: 英文 186 Pages
納期: 約2営業日
ご注意事項 :
本レポートは最新情報反映のため適宜更新し、内容構成変更を行う場合があります。ご検討の際はお問い合わせください。
  • 全表示
  • 概要
  • 目次
概要

概要

世界の農業用界面活性剤市場は、2022年に18億米ドルに達し、2023-2030年の予測期間中にCAGR 6.2%で成長し、2030年には29億米ドルに達すると予測されています。

世界の人口が増加するにつれ、食糧需要も増加し、世界中の農家が農業生産の拡大を必要としています。作物の病気や昆虫による攻撃の増加により、作物を保護する必要性が生じています。そのため、殺虫剤や農薬の需要が高まっています。農業用界面活性剤は農薬添加物であり、農作物に対する農薬の作用を高める一方で、害はほとんどないです。

メーカーは研究開発に投資し、湿潤性、展着性、付着性の向上などの特性を強化した新しい界面活性剤処方を革新しています。2021年5月、アドバンスト・バイオカタリティクス(ABC)は、新規バイオベース界面活性剤BioSS RLの商業的発売を発表しました。BioSS RLはその優れた濡れ性と起泡性から、農業を含む様々な産業に最適な界面活性剤です。BioSS RLはバイオベースであり、石油化学製品を一切使用していません。

非イオン性農業用界面活性剤は、その汎用性と幅広い農薬との適合性により、市場シェアの半分以上を占めています。同様に、アジア太平洋が農業用界面活性剤市場を独占しています。インド政府広報局によると、2021年から2022年にかけて、インドは過去最高の3億1,570万トンの食用穀物を生産しました。このように農業生産が増加しているため、農薬の効能を最適化し、作物の収量を向上させるために界面活性剤の使用が必要となっています。

ダイナミクス

農薬需要の高まり

農家が作物の収量を守るために雑草、害虫、病気の圧力に対処しようと努力するにつれ、効果的な農薬ソリューションの必要性が高まっています。アワ・ワールド・イン・データ』によると、2020年の農薬総使用量は266万1,124トンだった。農業用界面活性剤は、農薬の散布、湿潤、吸収能力を向上させることで、農薬の性能を高める上で極めて重要な役割を果たしています。

界面活性剤は、有効成分の被覆性と浸透性を向上させることで、農薬散布の効果を最大化し、最終的には作物保護の向上と収量の増加に貢献します。その結果、現代農業における農薬への依存の高まりが農業用界面活性剤の需要を煽り、農業界の高まるニーズに応えて市場の成長を促しています。

作物収量向上の必要性

FAOによると、2050年までに91億人の人口を養うためには、世界の食糧生産は2005/2007年から2050年の間に約70%増加しなければならないです。この世界の人口増加と食糧生産への圧力の高まりにより、農家は作物の生産性を最大化する革新的な解決策を求めています。農業用界面活性剤は、雑草、害虫、病気から作物を守るために不可欠な農薬の効能を向上させることで、重要な役割を果たしています。

界面活性剤は、これらの農薬の植物表面への被覆、付着、吸収を促進することで、より効果的な害虫駆除と雑草駆除を実現し、作物の健康と収穫量の増加につながります。農家が食糧、飼料、繊維の需要増に対応しようと努力する中、総合的な作物管理戦略の一環として農業用界面活性剤の採用が不可欠となっています。

厳しい規制

規制当局は、環境毒性、残留性、または人の健康に対する潜在的リスクに対する懸念から、界面活性剤製剤に使用される特定の有効成分に対して制限や禁止を課すことがあります。このような規制により、界面活性剤を配合するための主要成分の入手が制限される可能性があり、メーカーは製品の再製造を余儀なくされたり、効果が低かったりコストが高かったりする代替成分を探さざるを得なくなったりします。

2022年10月、エコロジー・環境省は「規制対象主要新規汚染物質リスト(2022年版)」の草案を発表しました。界面活性剤として広く普及しているパーフルオロオクタンスルホン酸(PFOS)とノニルフェノールは、リストに掲載された14種類の重点管理新汚染物質のうち、農業経営への影響が最も大きいと予想されています。これは、農薬の使用が完全に禁止されることを意味します。

目次

目次

第1章 調査手法と調査範囲

第2章 定義と概要

第3章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第4章 市場力学

  • 影響要因
    • 促進要因
      • 農薬需要の高まり
      • 農作物収量向上の必要性
    • 抑制要因
      • 厳しい規制
    • 機会
    • 影響分析

第5章 産業分析

  • ポーターのファイブフォース分析
  • サプライチェーン分析
  • 価格分析
  • 規制分析
  • ロシア・ウクライナ戦争の影響分析
  • DMIの見解

第6章 COVID-19分析

第7章 タイプ別

  • 陰イオン界面活性剤
  • 陽イオン界面活性剤
  • 非イオン界面活性剤
  • 大気中界面活性剤

第8章 基質タイプ別

  • 合成
  • バイオベース

第9章 作物タイプ別

  • 穀物・穀類
  • 豆類と油糧種子
  • 果物・野菜
  • 芝および観賞用牧草
  • その他

第10章 用途別

  • 除草剤
  • 殺菌剤
  • 殺虫剤
  • 植物成長調節剤
  • その他

第11章 地域別

  • 北米
    • 米国
    • カナダ
    • メキシコ
  • 欧州
    • ドイツ
    • 英国
    • フランス
    • イタリア
    • ロシア
    • その他欧州
  • 南米
    • ブラジル
    • アルゼンチン
    • その他南米
  • アジア太平洋
    • 中国
    • インド
    • 日本
    • オーストラリア
    • その他アジア太平洋地域
  • 中東・アフリカ

第12章 競合情勢

  • 競合シナリオ
  • 市況/シェア分析
  • M&A分析

第13章 企業プロファイル

  • ADAMA
    • 会社概要
    • 製品ポートフォリオと説明
    • 財務概要
    • 主な発展
  • Nufarm
  • Bayer AG
  • Loveland Products, Inc.
  • Wilbur-Ellis Holdings, Inc.
  • Evonik Industries AG
  • BASF SE
  • Corteva
  • Stepan Company
  • Innvictis Crop Care, LLC

第14章 付録

目次
Product Code: AG1807

Overview

Global Agricultural Surfactants Market reached US$ 1.8 billion in 2022 and is expected to reach US$ 2.9 billion by 2030, growing with a CAGR of 6.2% during the forecast period 2023-2030.

As the world's population grows, so does food demand, requiring farmers all over the world to expand agricultural output. The increase in crop diseases and attacks by insects has created a need for the protection of crops. This has increased the demand for insecticides and pesticides. Agricultural surfactants are pesticide additives that boost the pesticide's action on crops while posing little or no harm.

Manufacturers are investing in research and development to innovate new surfactant formulations with enhanced properties such as improved wetting, spreading, and adhesion. In May 2021, Advanced BioCatalytics (ABC) announced the commercial launch of BioSS RL, a novel bio-based surfactant. Because of its superior wetting and foaming properties, BioSS RL is a perfect surfactant for different industries including agriculture. BioSS RL is bio-based and has no petrochemicals.

Non-ionic agricultural surfactants account for over half of the market share due to their versatility and compatibility with a wide range of agrochemicals. Similarly, Asia-Pacific dominates the agricultural surfactants market. According to the Press Information of the Bureau, Government of India, in 2021-2022, India produced a record 315.7 million tonnes of food grains. This growing agricultural production necessitates the use of surfactants to optimize the efficacy of agrochemicals and improve crop yields.

Dynamics

Rising Demand for Agrochemicals

As farmers strive to address weed, pest, and disease pressures to safeguard crop yields, the need for effective agrochemical solutions intensifies. According to Our World in Data, the total pesticide use in 2020 was 2,661,124 tonnes. Agricultural surfactants play a pivotal role in enhancing the performance of these agrochemicals by improving their spreading, wetting, and absorption capabilities.

By ensuring better coverage and penetration of active ingredients, surfactants contribute to maximizing the efficacy of agrochemical applications, ultimately leading to improved crop protection and higher yields. As a result, the increasing reliance on agrochemicals in modern agriculture fuels the demand for agricultural surfactants, driving market growth in response to the escalating needs of the farming community.

Need for Enhanced Crop Yields

According to FAO, to feed the 9.1 billion people by the year 2050, global food production must increase by around 70% between 2005/2007 and 2050. With this global population growth and increasing pressure on food production, farmers are seeking innovative solutions to maximize crop productivity. Agricultural surfactants play a crucial role by improving the efficacy of agrochemicals which are essential for protecting crops from weeds, pests, and diseases.

By facilitating better coverage, adhesion, and absorption of these agrochemicals onto plant surfaces, surfactants ensure more effective pest and weed control, leading to healthier crops and increased yields. As farmers strive to meet the growing demand for food, feed, and fiber, the adoption of agricultural surfactants as part of integrated crop management strategies becomes indispensable.

Stringent Regulations

Regulatory authorities may impose restrictions or bans on certain active ingredients used in surfactant formulations due to concerns about their environmental toxicity, persistence, or potential risks to human health. Such restrictions can limit the availability of key ingredients for formulating surfactants, forcing manufacturers to reformulate their products or seek alternative ingredients, which may be less effective or more costly.

In October 2022, The Ministry of Ecology and Environment released a draft of the List of Key new pollutants under Control (2022). Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and nonylphenol, two prevalent surfactants, are anticipated to have the most effects on agricultural businesses out of the 14 new pollutants of priority management on the list. This implies that pesticide uses will be completely prohibited because they are not covered by the exemption.

Segment Analysis

The global agricultural surfactants Market is segmented based on type, substrate type, crop type, application and region.

Low Toxicity and Versatility of Non-Ionic Surfactants

Non-ionic surfactants are highly versatile and compatible with a wide range of agrochemical formulations, including herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, and plant growth regulators. They exhibit excellent compatibility with both acidic and alkaline solutions, as well as with other surfactants and additives commonly used in agricultural formulations. This versatility makes non-ionic surfactants preferred by agrochemical manufacturers.

In March 2020, Wilbur-Ellis Company, a recognized player in precision agriculture, crop protection, seed, and nutritional products, launched EMBRECE-EA, a special combination of surfactants intended to improve the wetting and spreading of spray materials and enhance the effectiveness of fungicides, insecticides, and miticides. EMBRECE-EA's proprietary blend of nonionic surfactants (NIS) enables growers to receive greater coverage and excellent wetting for their selected spray material.

Geographical Penetration

Asia-Pacific's Agricultural Dominance

Asia-Pacific is home to some of the world's largest agricultural economies, including China and India. The large use of pesticides made the Asia Pacific the largest market for agricultural surfactants. According to the Directorate of Plant Protection, Quarantine & Storage, Government of India, the total consumption of chemical pesticides in India was 52466.45 metric tons. This growth further fuels the demand for agricultural surfactants as essential ingredients in agrochemical formulations.

Precision farming is also becoming more popular in the region, with the usage of effective crop protection technologies like air-assisted chemical spraying, which is driving demand for high-performance adjuvants and driving market expansion in this area. The technological advancement in modern farming in Asia-Pacific has given a boost to the market.

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

Covid had a severe negative impact on the surfactant market. Demand for chemicals has been suffering a severe shock across multiple application-use markets. This is mainly because Covid-19 has upset the supply chain. This affected the production and availability of agricultural surfactants, leading to temporary supply constraints and price fluctuations.

Globally lockdowns and movement restrictions imposed to curb the spread of the virus disrupted agricultural activities such as planting, harvesting, and pest control operations. This affected the overall demand for agricultural surfactants as farmers postponed or reduced their use of various chemicals in the agricultural field during periods of uncertainty.

Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis

The conflict in the region has disrupted supply chains for agricultural inputs, including surfactants. Disruptions in transportation and logistics have led to shortages of these raw materials, impacting the availability and pricing of agricultural surfactants globally. The conflict has also disrupted agricultural production in Ukraine, a major exporter of agricultural commodities. Reduced agricultural output in Ukraine led to lower demand for surfactants in the region, affecting market growth.

By Type

  • Anionic Surfactants
  • Cationic Surfactants
  • Non-Ionic Surfactants
  • Atmospheric Surfactants

By Substrate Type

  • Synthetic
  • Bio-based

By Crop Type

  • Grains and Cereals
  • Pulses and Oilseeds
  • Fruits and Vegetables
  • Turf and Ornamental Grass
  • Others

By Application

  • Herbicides
  • Fungicides
  • Insecticides
  • Plant Growth Regulators
  • Others

By Region

  • North America
    • U.S.
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • France
    • Italy
    • Russia
    • Rest of Europe
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa

Key Developments

  • In January 2024, Bionema Group, developer of sustainable biocontrol solutions for crop protection and plant health management, introduced Soil-Jet BSP100, a biodegradable surfactant for agrochemicals and agricultural biologicals. The unique Polyether-Modified Polysiloxane technology of the Soil-Jet BSP100 is poised to revolutionize fertigation and irrigation techniques globally.
  • In February 2023, to maintain soil health and biodiversity, Pangaea Biosciences Ltd., a UK-based company focused on designing crop protection solutions, introduced a novel plant-based surfactant formulation technique to replace hazardous surfactants with natural plant-based components. These surfactants reduce soil fertility and health by killing bacteria and fungi in the soil when sprayed on crops.
  • In August 2021, CHS Agronomy, a global agribusiness cooperative, announced the latest offerings in its line of high-performance adjuvants which includes Last Chance Pro, a non-ionic surfactant. Last Chance Pro provides superior weed control of numerous herbicides, including glyphosate and glufosinate, along with a low use rate and good handling qualities.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the market include ADAMA, Nufarm, Bayer AG, Loveland Products, Inc., Wilbur-Ellis Holdings, Inc., Evonik Industries AG, BASF SE, Corteva, Stepan Company, Innvictis Crop Care, LLC

Why Purchase the Report?

  • To visualize the global agricultural surfactants market segmentation based on type, substrate type, crop type, application, and region as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
  • Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
  • Excel data sheet with numerous data points of agricultural surfactants market-level with all segments.
  • PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
  • Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global agricultural surfactants Market report would provide approximately 70 tables, 66 figures and 186 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

  • Manufacturers/ Buyers
  • Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
  • Research Professionals
  • Emerging Companies

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

1.Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1.Research Methodology
  • 1.2.Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2.Definition and Overview

3.Executive Summary

  • 3.1.Snippet by Type
  • 3.2.Snippet by Substrate Type
  • 3.3.Snippet by Crop Type
  • 3.4.Snippet by Application
  • 3.5.Snippet by Region

4.Dynamics

  • 4.1.Impacting Factors
    • 4.1.1.Drivers
      • 4.1.1.1.Rising Demand for Agrochemicals
      • 4.1.1.2.Need for Enhanced Crop Yields
    • 4.1.2.Restraints
      • 4.1.2.1.Stringent Regulations
    • 4.1.3.Opportunity
    • 4.1.4.Impact Analysis

5.Industry Analysis

  • 5.1.Porter's Five Force Analysis
  • 5.2.Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.3.Pricing Analysis
  • 5.4.Regulatory Analysis
  • 5.5.Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis
  • 5.6.DMI Opinion

6.COVID-19 Analysis

  • 6.1.Analysis of COVID-19
    • 6.1.1.Scenario Before COVID
    • 6.1.2.Scenario During COVID
    • 6.1.3.Scenario Post COVID
  • 6.2.Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
  • 6.3.Demand-Supply Spectrum
  • 6.4.Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
  • 6.5.Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
  • 6.6.Conclusion

7.By Type

  • 7.1.Introduction
    • 7.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 7.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Type
  • 7.2.Anionic Surfactants*
    • 7.2.1.Introduction
    • 7.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 7.3.Cationic Surfactants
  • 7.4.Non-Ionic Surfactants
  • 7.5.Atmospheric Surfactants

8.By Substrate Type

  • 8.1.Introduction
    • 8.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Substrate Type
    • 8.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Substrate Type
  • 8.2.Synthetic*
    • 8.2.1.Introduction
    • 8.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 8.3.Bio-based

9.By Crop Type

  • 9.1.Introduction
    • 9.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop Type
    • 9.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Crop Type
  • 9.2.Grains and Cereals*
    • 9.2.1.Introduction
    • 9.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 9.3.Pulses and Oilseeds
  • 9.4.Fruits and Vegetables
  • 9.5.Turf and Ornamental Grass
  • 9.6.Others

10.By Application

  • 10.1.Introduction
    • 10.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 10.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Application
  • 10.2.Herbicides*
    • 10.2.1.Introduction
    • 10.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 10.3.Fungicides
  • 10.4.Insecticides
  • 10.5.Plant Growth Regulators
  • 10.6.Others

11.By Region

  • 11.1.Introduction
    • 11.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
    • 11.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
  • 11.2.North America
    • 11.2.1.Introduction
    • 11.2.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.2.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.2.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Substrate Type
    • 11.2.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop Type
    • 11.2.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 11.2.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.2.7.1.U.S.
      • 11.2.7.2.Canada
      • 11.2.7.3.Mexico
  • 11.3.Europe
    • 11.3.1.Introduction
    • 11.3.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.3.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.3.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Substrate Type
    • 11.3.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop Type
    • 11.3.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 11.3.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.3.7.1.Germany
      • 11.3.7.2.UK
      • 11.3.7.3.France
      • 11.3.7.4.Italy
      • 11.3.7.5.Russia
      • 11.3.7.6.Rest of Europe
  • 11.4.South America
    • 11.4.1.Introduction
    • 11.4.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.4.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.4.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Substrate Type
    • 11.4.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop Type
    • 11.4.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 11.4.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.4.7.1.Brazil
      • 11.4.7.2.Argentina
      • 11.4.7.3.Rest of South America
  • 11.5.Asia-Pacific
    • 11.5.1.Introduction
    • 11.5.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.5.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.5.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Substrate Type
    • 11.5.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop Type
    • 11.5.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 11.5.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.5.7.1.China
      • 11.5.7.2.India
      • 11.5.7.3.Japan
      • 11.5.7.4.Australia
      • 11.5.7.5.Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 11.6.Middle East and Africa
    • 11.6.1.Introduction
    • 11.6.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.6.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.6.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Substrate Type
    • 11.6.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop Type
    • 11.6.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application

12.Competitive Landscape

  • 12.1.Competitive Scenario
  • 12.2.Market Positioning/Share Analysis
  • 12.3.Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

13.Company Profiles

  • 13.1.ADAMA*
    • 13.1.1.Company Overview
    • 13.1.2.Product Portfolio and Description
    • 13.1.3.Financial Overview
    • 13.1.4.Key Developments
  • 13.2.Nufarm
  • 13.3.Bayer AG
  • 13.4.Loveland Products, Inc.
  • 13.5.Wilbur-Ellis Holdings, Inc.
  • 13.6.Evonik Industries AG
  • 13.7.BASF SE
  • 13.8.Corteva
  • 13.9.Stepan Company
  • 13.10.Innvictis Crop Care, LLC

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

14.Appendix

  • 14.1.About Us and Services
  • 14.2.Contact Us