サンプル依頼リスト カート
  • English
  • Korean
  • Traditional Chinese
  • Simplified Chinese
デフォルト表紙
市場調査レポート
商品コード
1446804

バイオネマティサイドの世界市場 2023-20230

Global Bionematicides Market - 2023-20230
出版日: | 発行: DataM Intelligence | ページ情報: 英文 195 Pages | 納期: 約2営業日

● お客様のご希望に応じて、既存データの加工や未掲載情報（例：国別セグメント）の追加などの対応が可能です。　 詳細はお問い合わせください。

価格
価格表記: USDを日本円(税抜)に換算
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=156.70円
バイオネマティサイドの世界市場 2023-20230
出版日: 2024年02月13日
発行: DataM Intelligence
ページ情報: 英文 195 Pages
納期: 約2営業日
ご注意事項 :
本レポートは最新情報反映のため適宜更新し、内容構成変更を行う場合があります。ご検討の際はお問い合わせください。
  • 全表示
  • 概要
  • 目次
概要

概要

バイオネマティサイド（殺線虫剤）の世界市場は、2022年に2億2,670万米ドルに達し、2023-2030年の予測期間中にCAGR 15.6%で成長し、2030年には7億2,640万米ドルに達すると予測されています。

農業の持続可能性と環境負荷の低減が強く注目されています。バイオネマティサイドはより環境に優しく、化学殺線虫剤に代わる持続可能な選択肢として支持を集めています。こうした需要の高まりを受けて、各メーカーは幅広い製品を開拓し、バイオ殺線虫剤市場を拡大しています。2023年7月、農業関連企業のシンジェンタは、サトウキビ畑の線虫、蛾、病害に対処するためのCERTANO生物学的ソリューションとCropwiseデジタル技術を発表しました。

政府や規制機関は、化学農薬の使用に厳しい規制を課しています。毒性が低く、環境への影響も少ないバイオネマティック殺虫剤は、適合する代替農薬として支持されています。植物寄生性線虫は化学殺線虫剤に対する耐性を獲得しつつあります。生物殺線虫剤は、線虫を効果的に管理するための貴重な手段となります。

土壌処理は、根レベルで線虫を直接標的にするため、バイオネマティサイド市場で大きなシェアを占めています。北米は、持続可能で環境に優しい農業への注目が高まっているため、バイオネマティサイド市場で大きなシェアを占めています。2021年9月、Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc.は、次世代線虫剤/殺虫剤であるMBI-306を米国の規制当局に提出することを宣言しました。さらに同社は、米国で1,000万エーカー以上に散布され、広く使用されているバイオネマティサイド種子処理剤MBI-206を提出する最終段階にあると宣言しました。

ダイナミクス

線虫による作物の損失拡大

線虫は世界中で作物の大幅な減収の原因となっています。作付体系における線虫に関する全インド共同調査プロジェクト（AICRP）によると、植物寄生線虫による作物損失は毎年21.3%にのぼり、その額は1,020億3,979万ルピー（15億8,000万米ドル）にのぼる。線虫は植物の根を食害するため、成長が阻害され、養分の取り込みが減少し、最終的には作物の収量が減少します。線虫の蔓延に直面している農家は、こうした損失を軽減する効果的な解決策を積極的に模索しています。

従来の化学殺線虫剤は、環境や健康に悪影響を及ぼす可能性があります。より持続可能で環境に優しい農法へのシフトにより、バイオネマティサイドは魅力的な選択肢となっています。バイオネマティサイドは、一般的に環境に対してより安全であると考えられているため、より持続可能な選択肢となります。分解速度が速く、非標的生物に対する毒性も低いため、環境への影響も全体的に軽減されます。

有機食品に対する需要の高まり

FiBLによると、2021年のオーガニック小売売上高は40億ユーロ増加し、1,250億ユーロ近くに達します。従来の作物に残留する農薬への懸念から、消費者はオーガニック食品を求めるようになっています。合成化学農薬を使わずに栽培された製品を好むのです。その結果、有機食品への需要が高まり、バイオネマティサイドのような有機害虫駆除ソリューションへのニーズが高まっています。

有機認証基準を満たすため、有機農家は承認された有機害虫駆除法を使用しなければならないです。バイオネマティサイドは有機農法に準拠していると見なされるため、有機農家のステータスを維持しながら線虫の侵入を管理しようとする有機農家にとって、バイオネマティサイドは自然な選択肢となります。

作用速度が遅く、有効期限が短い

バイオネマティサイドは通常、生物または天然化合物から構成されているため、線虫を即座に駆除することはできず、むしろ合成の殺線虫剤よりも効果が出るまでに時間がかかります。この作用の遅れは、特に線虫の個体数の急激な増加が作物の収量を脅かすような状況では、欠点となりうる。農家は、迅速な効果が得られる化学殺線虫剤を好むかもしれないです。

バイオネマティサイドは化学合成の殺線虫剤に比べ、保存期間が短いことが多いです。この限られた保存期間は、製造業者、流通業者、小売業者にとって物流上の課題となります。特別な保管条件が必要になる場合もあり、製品の期限切れのリスクが在庫の浪費につながることもあります。

目次

第1章 調査手法と調査範囲

第2章 定義と概要

第3章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第4章 市場力学

  • 影響要因
    • 促進要因
      • 線虫による作物損失の増加
      • 有機食品への需要の高まり
    • 抑制要因
      • 作用速度の遅さ、保存期間の短さ
    • 機会
    • 影響分析

第5章 産業分析

  • ポーターのファイブフォース分析
  • サプライチェーン分析
  • 価格分析
  • 規制分析

第6章 COVID-19分析

第7章 タイプ別

  • 微生物
  • 生化学

第8章 形態別

  • 乾式
  • 液体

第9章 作物別

  • 穀物
  • 油糧種子と豆類
  • 果物・野菜
  • その他

第10章 病害虫別

  • 根こぶ線虫
  • シスト線虫
  • 病害線虫
  • その他

第11章 適用形態別

  • 種子処理
  • 土壌処理
  • 葉面散布
  • その他

第12章 地域別

  • 北米
    • 米国
    • カナダ
    • メキシコ
  • 欧州
    • ドイツ
    • 英国
    • フランス
    • イタリア
    • ロシア
    • その他欧州
  • 南米
    • ブラジル
    • アルゼンチン
    • その他南米
  • アジア太平洋
    • 中国
    • インド
    • 日本
    • オーストラリア
    • その他アジア太平洋地域
  • 中東・アフリカ

第13章 競合情勢

  • 競合シナリオ
  • 市況/シェア分析
  • M&A分析

第14章 企業プロファイル

  • FMC Corporation
    • 会社概要
    • 製品ポートフォリオと説明
    • 財務概要
    • 最近の動向
  • Corteva
  • Agri Life
  • Certis USA L.L.C.
  • Pro Farm Group Inc
  • T.Stanes and Company Limited
  • Valent BioSciences
  • Crop IQ Technology Ltd
  • Biotech International Limited
  • KILPEST INDIA LTD

第15章 会社概要付録

目次
Product Code: AG7972

Overview

Global Bionematicides Market reached US$ 226.7 million in 2022 and is expected to reach US$ 726.4 million by 2030, growing with a CAGR of 15.6% during the forecast period 2023-2030.

There is a strong focus on sustainability and reducing the environmental impact of agriculture. Bionematicides, being more environmentally friendly, are gaining traction as a sustainable alternative to chemical nematicides. Due to this growing demand, manufacturers are developing a wide range of products and expanding the bionemticides market. In July 2023, Syngenta, an agriculture company, introduced CERTANO biological solution and Cropwise digital technology to tackle nematodes, moths, and diseases in sugarcane fields.

Governments and regulatory bodies are imposing stricter regulations on the use of chemical pesticides. Bionematicides, with their lower toxicity and reduced environmental impact, are finding favor as compliant alternatives. Plant-parasitic nematodes are developing resistance to chemical nematicides. Bionematicides provide a valuable tool to manage nematodes effectively, especially when chemical options become less effective.

Soil treatment holds a significant share of the bionematicides market due to its direct targeting of nematodes at the root level. North America held a significant share of the bionematicides market due to its increasing focus on sustainable and eco-friendly agriculture. In September 2021, Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. declared submitting MBI-306, its next-generation nematicide/insecticide, to regulatory authorities in the United States. Additionally, the company declared that it was in the final stages of submitting MBI-206, a widely used bionematicide seed treatment that is applied on over 10 million acres in the United States.

Dynamics

Growing Cropp Loss due to Nematode

Nematodes are responsible for substantial crop yield losses worldwide. According to the All India Coordinated Research Project (AICRP) on Nematodes in Cropping Systems, Plant-parasitic nematodes result in 21.3% of crop losses each year, amounting to Rs. 102,039.79 million (1.58 billion USD). Nematodes feed on plant roots, causing stunted growth, reduced nutrient uptake, and ultimately decreased crop yields. Farmers facing nematode infestations are actively seeking effective solutions to mitigate these losses.

Traditional chemical nematicides can have negative environmental and health impacts. The shift towards more sustainable and eco-friendly agricultural practices has made bionematicides an attractive choice. Bionematicides offer a more sustainable alternative because they are generally considered safer for the environment. They break down more rapidly and have lower toxicity to non-target organisms, reducing the overall environmental impact.

Rising Demand for Organic Food Products

According to FiBL, in 2021, organic retail sales climbed by 4 billion euros and reached nearly 125 billion euros. Consumers are increasingly seeking organic food products due to concerns about pesticide residues on conventional crops. They prefer products that are grown without synthetic chemical pesticides. As a result, the demand for organic food products has risen, driving the need for organic pest control solutions like bionematicides.

To meet organic certification standards, organic farmers must use approved organic pest control methods. Bionematicides are considered compliant with organic farming practices, making them a natural choice for organic farmers looking to manage nematode infestations while maintaining their organic status.

Slow Speed of Action and Short Shelf Life

Bionematicides, which typically consist of living organisms or natural compounds, do not provide immediate control of nematodes, rather it takes longer to act than synthetic nematicides. This delay in action can be a drawback, especially in situations where rapid nematode population growth threatens crop yields. Farmers may prefer chemical nematicides that offer quicker results.

Bionematicides often have shorter shelf lives compared to synthetic chemical nematicides. This limited shelf life can pose logistical challenges for manufacturers, distributors, and retailers. It may require special storage conditions, and the risk of product expiration can lead to wasted inventory.

Segment Analysis

The global bionematicides market is segmented based on type, form, crop, infestation, mode of application and region.

Soil Treatment Held the Highest Share in the Bionematicides Market

Soil treatment as a mode of application in bionematicides promotes numerous agricultural benefits. It enhances seed germination, accelerates plant growth, optimizes moisture and nutrient utilization, and ultimately leads to increased crop yields. This approach significantly contributes to the highest share in the bionematicides market.

Soil treatment allows bionematicides to be applied directly to the root zone where nematodes primarily reside and cause damage. This direct targeting increases the efficacy of bionematicides in controlling nematode populations. In January 2022, Certis Biologicals, a pioneer in the development of biological pesticides, announced the launch of its new bionematicide, MeloCon LC. MeloCon LC enables late-season nematode control by being applied up to 14 days before planting, during the growth season, and at planting.

Geographical Penetration

North America's Growing Focus on Sustainability

North America is increasingly recognizing the significance of sustainable and eco-friendly agricultural practices. In this context, bionematicides have gained prominence as a greener alternative to chemical nematicides, in line with the region's sustainability objectives.

The region has seen substantial investments in research and development related to bionematicides, resulting in the introduction of more effective and reliable products. In August 2023, Indigo Ag, a provider of sustainable agriculture solutions, declared the launch of Biotrinsic Z15, the company's first bionematicide for the U.S. market. Biotrinsic Z15 for soybean and maize is an extension of the business's biological inventions.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players include FMC Corporation, Corteva, Agri Life, Certis USA L.L.C., Pro Farm Group Inc, T.Stanes and Company Limited, Valent BioSciences, Crop IQ Technology Ltd, Biotech International Limited, KILPEST INDIA LTD

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

COVID Impact

The pandemic increased awareness of the importance of sustainable and resilient food systems. This shift in mindset favored the adoption of bionematicides as a more sustainable and environmentally friendly pest control solution. Consumer demand for organic and pesticide-free produce grew during the pandemic. Bionematicides, being compatible with organic farming, gained traction as a means of meeting this demand.

However, the pandemic disrupted supply chains, causing delays in the production and distribution of agricultural inputs, including bionematicides. Lockdowns, travel restrictions, and labor shortages affected the availability of these products. Many farmers faced challenges in accessing markets due to lockdowns and social distancing measures. This limited their ability to purchase and use bionematicides.

Russia- Ukraine War Impact

The conflict disrupted transportation routes and supply chains in the region, and it affected the availability of bionematicides, especially where key production or distribution facilities are located in the affected areas. Geopolitical instability due to the war impacted the economic stability of the countries involved and neighboring regions. This led to fluctuations in currency exchange rates and overall market uncertainty, affecting the cost and availability of agricultural inputs like bionematicides.

Economic sanctions impacted the country's ability to import agricultural products like biopesticides and seeds. The war affected the agricultural activities in the region. As a result, there is a reduced demand for various agricultural inputs including bionematicides in the region which impacted its market growth.

By Type

  • Microbials
  • Biochemicals

By Form

  • Dry
  • Liquid

By Crop

  • Cereals & Grains
  • Oilseeds & Pulses
  • Fruits & Vegetables
  • Others

By Infestation

  • Root-Knot Nematodes
  • Cyst Nematodes
  • Lesion Nematodes
  • Others

By Mode of Application

  • Seed Treatment
  • Soil Treatment
  • Foliar Spray
  • Others

By Region

  • North America
    • U.S.
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • France
    • Italy
    • Russia
    • Rest of Europe
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa

Key Developments

  • In December 2022, Corteva Agriscience, an American agricultural chemical and seed company, introduced Lumialza, a biological nematicide for seed treatment in Brazil. Lumialza contains a naturally occurring organism, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens bacteria (strain PTA-4838). This organism colonises the root region and forms a biological barrier against a variety of dangerous nematodes.
  • In August 2021, Sumitomo Chemical introduced Aveo in Brazil. It is a novel biological method of treating seeds to combat nematodes.
  • In October 2022, Holganix, a biotechnology company, declared that it had been granted a US patent (US 11,447,427 B2) for a new microbial bionematicide technology.
  • In December 2021, BASF SE, a manufacturer of chemicals, plastics, crop protection products, etc. introduced its first bionematicide under the Votivo Prime trade name.

Why Purchase the Report?

  • To visualize the global bionematicides market segmentation based on type, form, crop, infestation, mode of application and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
  • Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
  • Excel data sheet with numerous data points of Bionematicides market-level with all segments.
  • PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
  • Product mapping available as Excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global bionematicides market report would provide approximately 77 tables, 78 figures and 195 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

  • Manufacturers/ Buyers
  • Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
  • Research Professionals
  • Emerging Companies

Table of Contents

1. Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1. Research Methodology
  • 1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Snippet by Type
  • 3.2. Snippet by Form
  • 3.3. Snippet by Crop
  • 3.4. Snippet by Infestation
  • 3.5. Snippet by Mode of Application
  • 3.6. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

  • 4.1. Impacting Factors
    • 4.1.1. Drivers
      • 4.1.1.1. Growing Cropp Loss due to Nematode
      • 4.1.1.2. Rising Demand for Organic Food Products
    • 4.1.2. Restraints
      • 4.1.2.1. Slow Speed of Action and Short Shelf Life
    • 4.1.3. Opportunity
    • 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

  • 5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
  • 5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.3. Pricing Analysis
  • 5.4. Regulatory Analysis

6. COVID-19 Analysis

  • 6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
    • 6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID
    • 6.1.2. Scenario During COVID
    • 6.1.3. Scenario Post COVID
  • 6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
  • 6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
  • 6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
  • 6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
  • 6.6. Conclusion

7. By Type

  • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Type
  • 7.2. Microbials *
    • 7.2.1. Introduction
    • 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 7.3. Biochemicals

8. By Form

  • 8.1. Introduction
    • 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Form
  • 8.2. Dry*
    • 8.2.1. Introduction
    • 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 8.3. Liquid

9. By Crop

  • 9.1. Introduction
    • 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop
    • 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Crop
  • 9.2. Cereals & Grains*
    • 9.2.1. Introduction
    • 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 9.3. Oilseeds & Pulses
  • 9.4. Fruits & Vegetables
  • 9.5. Others

10. By Infestation

  • 10.1. Introduction
    • 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Infestation
    • 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Infestation
  • 10.2. Root-Knot Nematodes*
    • 10.2.1. Introduction
    • 10.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 10.3. Cyst Nematodes
  • 10.4. Lesion Nematodes
  • 10.5. Others

11. By Mode of Application

  • 11.1. Introduction
    • 11.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Mode of Application
    • 11.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Mode of Application
  • 11.2. Seed Treatment*
    • 11.2.1. Introduction
    • 11.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 11.3. Soil Treatment
  • 11.4. Foliar Spray
  • 11.5. Others

12. By Region

  • 12.1. Introduction
    • 12.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
    • 12.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
  • 12.2. North America
    • 12.2.1. Introduction
    • 12.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 12.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 12.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 12.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop
    • 12.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Infestation
    • 12.2.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Mode of Application
    • 12.2.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 12.2.8.1. U.S.
      • 12.2.8.2. Canada
      • 12.2.8.3. Mexico
  • 12.3. Europe
    • 12.3.1. Introduction
    • 12.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 12.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 12.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 12.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop
    • 12.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Infestation
    • 12.3.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Mode of Application
    • 12.3.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 12.3.8.1. Germany
      • 12.3.8.2. UK
      • 12.3.8.3. France
      • 12.3.8.4. Italy
      • 12.3.8.5. Russia
      • 12.3.8.6. Rest of Europe
  • 12.4. South America
    • 12.4.1. Introduction
    • 12.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 12.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 12.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 12.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop
    • 12.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Infestation
    • 12.4.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Mode of Application
    • 12.4.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 12.4.8.1. Brazil
      • 12.4.8.2. Argentina
      • 12.4.8.3. Rest of South America
  • 12.5. Asia-Pacific
    • 12.5.1. Introduction
    • 12.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 12.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 12.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 12.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop
    • 12.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Infestation
    • 12.5.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Mode of Application
    • 12.5.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 12.5.8.1. China
      • 12.5.8.2. India
      • 12.5.8.3. Japan
      • 12.5.8.4. Australia
      • 12.5.8.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 12.6. Middle East and Africa
    • 12.6.1. Introduction
    • 12.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 12.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 12.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 12.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop
    • 12.6.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Infestation
    • 12.6.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Mode of Application

13. Competitive Landscape

  • 13.1. Competitive Scenario
  • 13.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
  • 13.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

14. Company Profiles

  • 14.1. FMC Corporation*
    • 14.1.1. Company Overview
    • 14.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
    • 14.1.3. Financial Overview
    • 14.1.4. Recent Developments
  • 14.2. Corteva
  • 14.3. Agri Life
  • 14.4. Certis USA L.L.C.
  • 14.5. Pro Farm Group Inc
  • 14.6. T.Stanes and Company Limited
  • 14.7. Valent BioSciences
  • 14.8. Crop IQ Technology Ltd
  • 14.9. Biotech International Limited
  • 14.10. KILPEST INDIA LTD

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

15. Appendix

  • 15.1. About Us and Services
  • 15.2. Contact Us