デフォルト表紙
市場調査レポート
商品コード
1325375

ブリッジシミュレーターの世界市場-2023年~2030年

Global Ship Bridge Simulator Market - 2023-2030

出版日: | 発行: DataM Intelligence | ページ情報: 英文 192 Pages | 納期: 約2営業日

● お客様のご希望に応じて、既存データの加工や未掲載情報(例:国別セグメント)の追加などの対応が可能です。  詳細はお問い合わせください。

価格
価格表記: USDを日本円(税抜)に換算
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=156.70円
ブリッジシミュレーターの世界市場-2023年~2030年
出版日: 2023年08月04日
発行: DataM Intelligence
ページ情報: 英文 192 Pages
納期: 約2営業日
ご注意事項 :
本レポートは最新情報反映のため適宜更新し、内容構成変更を行う場合があります。ご検討の際はお問い合わせください。
  • 全表示
  • 概要
  • 目次
概要

市場概要

ブリッジシミュレーターの世界市場は2022年に22億米ドルに達し、2023-2030年の予測期間中にCAGR 6.4%で成長し、2030年には31億米ドルに達すると予測されています。

ブリッジシミュレーターの世界市場は、海運産業における高度な訓練とシミュレーションシステムに対する需要の増加に牽引され、著しい成長を遂げています。ブリッジシミュレーターは、船舶乗組員を訓練し、現実的で没入感のある環境で乗組員のスキルを向上させるための安全で費用対効果の高いプラットフォームを提供します。

近年、海洋産業は著しい技術の進歩や世界の貿易活動の活発化を目の当たりにしてきました。これらの要因により、安全性と効率性が重視されるようになり、船主や訓練機関がブリッジシミュレーターに投資するようになっています。

対話型ブリッジシミュレーターは、急速な成長を遂げ、市場シェアの半分以上を占め、タイプ別セグメントを支配しています。この著しい成長は、技術の進歩と海上安全に対する需要の高まりによるものです。同様に、北米はブリッジシミュレーターシステム市場で最大の市場シェアを占めており、市場全体の3分の1以上を占めています。北米は、ブリッジシミュレーターシステム市場において大きな可能性を示しており、その主な理由は、海事技術の進歩と海事従事者の効果的な訓練と評価の必要性です。

市場力学

費用対効果の高い訓練と技術進歩への注目

運用コストの上昇と効率的な訓練方法の必要性に直面して、ブリッジシミュレーターは海事訓練のための費用対効果の高いソリューションを提供します。従来の船上訓練は、時間とコストがかかり、多大なリソースを必要とし、乗組員と船舶の双方にリスクをもたらします。ブリッジシミュレーターは、船舶、乗組員、環境に実際のリスクを与えることなく、訓練生が様々なシナリオを繰り返し練習することを可能にします。オーストラリア海事安全局(AMSA)は、訓練コストの削減と技能開発の強化におけるシミュレータの価値を認めています。

ブリッジシミュレーター市場は急速な技術進歩を目の当たりにし、様々な海事機関や組織での採用を後押ししています。最新のシミュレーターは、高解像度の視覚化システム、先進的なモーション・プラットフォーム、リアルタイムの気象シミュレーションなど、最先端の技術を備えています。それぞれの進歩により、ブリッジシミュレーターは非常にリアルになり、実世界のシナリオを忠実に再現した没入感のある体験を訓練生に提供しています。

政府や規制機関も、助成金や補助金を通じて先進的なシミュレーターの導入を奨励しています。例えば、欧州連合(EU)は、Horizon 2020フレームワークなどの資金提供プログラムを通じて、海事シミュレーション技術の研究開発イニシアチブを支援しています。

海上訓練の高度化と操船技能に対する需要の高まり

ブリッジシミュレーター市場の成長に寄与する主な促進要因の1つは、海事訓練と安全基準の強化への注目が高まっていることです。船舶の運航が複雑化し、熟練した航海士の必要性が高まる中、ブリッジシミュレーターは実地訓練のための重要なツールとして浮上しています。

世界中の政府や海事規制当局は、有能な乗組員の訓練と操船技術向上のためのシミュレータ利用の重要性を強調しています。国際海事機関(IMO)によると、訓練目的でのシミュレータの使用は、訓練、認証及び当直の基準(STCW)条約で義務付けられています。

STCW条約は船員の訓練と認証の基準を定めており、現実的で効率的な訓練を提供し、安全な航海と操船を確保するためにシミュレーターの使用を義務付けています。世界の海運業界では、さまざまな厳しい条件下で船舶を操船できる熟練航海士の需要が急増しています。

ブリッジシミュレーターは、悪天候、狭い水路、混雑した港湾などの複雑なシナリオで操船を練習するためのリスクのない環境を提供します。安全な航行、燃料効率、環境への影響の低減がますます重視されるようになり、包括的な操船訓練への需要がさらに高まっています。

高い初期投資コストと発展途上地域における限られたアクセシビリティ

ブリッジシミュレーター市場が直面する主な抑制要因の1つは、高度なシミュレータシステムの調達と設置に伴う初期投資コストの高さです。高度なシミュレータは、リアルで没入感のある訓練環境を作り出すために、最先端のハードウェアとソフトウェア・コンポーネントを必要とします。

さらに、これらのシステムの保守や更新にかかる費用は相当なものとなり、シミュレーター運営者の全体的な出費に拍車をかけることになります。国際海事機関(IMO)の報告書によると、フルミッションのブリッジシミュレーターの初期投資額は、システムの複雑さや機能にもよるが、200万米ドルから500万米ドルに及ぶ。多額の初期費用がかかるため、小規模な海事訓練機関や発展途上国では、こうした先進的なシミュレーター技術への投資が敬遠されがちです。

ブリッジシミュレーター市場のもう一つの重要な抑制要因は、新興国市場におけるシミュレータのアクセスや普及が限られていることです。先進国は設備の整った海事訓練施設を設立しているが、多くの発展途上国は先進的なシミュレータシステムに投資するのに必要なインフラや資金が不足しています。

そのため、シミュレータ訓練の機会が偏在し、市場全体の成長を妨げています。世界銀行の統計によると、低所得国では海事訓練施設の普及率が低く、先進的なシミュレーター技術を利用できる国は18%に過ぎないです。一方、高所得国では、シミュレーターを備えた海事訓練施設の普及率が82%を誇っています。このような格差は、新興国市場におけるブリッジシミュレーター市場の成長を促進するための支援と資金提供の必要性を示唆しています。

COVID-19影響分析

COVID-19の流行は世界中の様々な産業に消えない足跡を残しており、海事セクターも例外ではないです。海事訓練と安全において重要な役割を果たす世界のブリッジシミュレーター市場もパンデミックの影響を受けています。ブリッジシミュレーターは、海事専門家が実際のシナリオをシミュレートし、航海、コミュニケーション、意思決定のスキルを高めるために使用する高度な訓練ツールです。

これらのシミュレーターは、ブリッジとその周辺環境を再現し、航海、操船、緊急事態など様々なシナリオの訓練に安全で費用対効果の高いプラットフォームを提供します。国際海事機関(IMO)などの海事規制機関による世界の政府データは、世界のブリッジシミュレーター市場の成長動向や課題に関する貴重な洞察を提供することができます。

パンデミックが世界的に広がる中、渡航制限や封鎖措置は海事訓練活動に深刻な影響を与えました。多くの訓練機関や海事学校が、現場での訓練プログラムの中断や縮小を余儀なくされました。このような訓練スケジュールの混乱は、ブリッジシミュレーターの需要減少につながり、パンデミック期間中の市場の成長に影響を与えました。

目次

第1章 調査手法と調査範囲

第2章 定義と概要

第3章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第4章 市場力学

  • 影響要因
    • 促進要因
      • 費用対効果の高い訓練と技術進歩への注目
      • 海上訓練の高度化と船舶操縦技能に対する需要の高まり
    • 抑制要因
      • 初期投資コストの高さ、発展途上国でのアクセス制限
    • 機会
    • 影響分析

第5章 産業分析

  • ポーターのファイブフォース分析
  • サプライチェーン分析
  • 価格分析
  • 規制分析

第6章 COVID-19分析

第7章 タイプ別

  • インタラクティブブリッジシミュレーター
  • 非インタラクティブブリッジシミュレーター

第8章 ソリューション別

  • ライブトレーニング
  • 専門的トレーニング
  • 建設的トレーニング
  • バーチャルトレーニング
  • システムトレーニング
  • ゲームシミュレーション研修

第9章 組織規模別

  • 大規模組織
  • 中規模組織
  • 小規模組織

第10章 エンドユーザー別

  • 船舶
  • 教育機関

第11章 地域別

  • 北米
    • 米国
    • カナダ
    • メキシコ
  • 欧州
    • ドイツ
    • 英国
    • フランス
    • イタリア
    • ロシア
    • その他欧州
  • 南米
    • ブラジル
    • アルゼンチン
    • その他南米
  • アジア太平洋
    • 中国
    • インド
    • 日本
    • オーストラリア
    • その他アジア太平洋
  • 中東・アフリカ

第12章 競合情勢

  • 競合シナリオ
  • 市況/シェア分析
  • M&A分析

第13章 企業プロファイル

  • Wartsila
    • 会社概要
    • 製品ポートフォリオと説明
    • 財務概要
    • 主な動向
  • Rheinmetall AG
  • General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
  • AVEVA Group plc
  • Presagis Canada Inc.
  • ST Engineering
  • BMT Group Ltd
  • ARI Simulation
  • PC Maritime
  • FORCE TECHNOLOGY

第14章 付録

目次
Product Code: ICT6599

Market Overview

Global Ship Bridge Simulator Market reached US$ 2.2 billion in 2022 and is expected to reach US$ 3.1 billion by 2030, growing with a CAGR of 6.4% during the forecast period 2023-2030.

The global ship bridge simulator market is experiencing remarkable growth, driven by the increasing demand for advanced training and simulation systems in the maritime industry. ship bridge simulator provides a safe and cost-effective platform for training ship crews and enhancing their skills in a realistic and immersive environment.

In recent years, the maritime industry has witnessed significant technological advancements and an upswing in global trade activities. The respective factors have led to an increased focus on safety and efficiency, prompting shipowners and training institutes to invest in ship bridge simulators.

The interactive ship bridge simulators segment dominates the type segment, experiencing rapid growth and capturing over half of the market share. The remarkable growth can be attributed to advancements in technology and rising demand for maritime safety. In a similar vein, the North America holds the largest market share in the ship bridge simulator system market, accounting for over one-third of the total market share. North America exhibits vast potential in the ship bridge simulator system market, primarily due to advancements in maritime technology and the need for effective training and evaluation of maritime personnel.

Market Dynamics

Focus on Cost-Effective Training and Technological Advancements

In the face of rising operational costs and the need for efficient training methods, ship bridge simulators offer a cost-effective solution for maritime training. Traditional onboard training can be time-consuming and expensive, requiring significant resources and posing risks to both crew and vessel. Ship bridge simulators allow trainees to practice various scenarios repeatedly without any actual risk to vessels, crew, or the environment. The Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) has recognized the value of simulators in reducing training costs and enhancing skill development.

The ship bridge simulator market has witnessed rapid technological advancements, driving its adoption across various maritime institutions and organizations. Modern simulators are equipped with state-of-the-art technology, including high-resolution visualization systems, advanced motion platforms, and real-time weather simulations. The respective advancements have made ship bridge simulators highly realistic, providing trainees with an immersive experience that closely replicates real-world scenarios.

Governments and regulatory bodies are also encouraging the adoption of advanced simulators through grants and subsidies. For instance, the European Union (EU) has been supporting research and development initiatives in maritime simulation technology through funding programs such as the Horizon 2020 framework.

Advancements in Maritime Training and Rising Demand for Vessel Maneuvering Skills

One of the key drivers contributing to the growth of the ship bridge simulator market is the increasing focus on enhancing maritime training and safety standards. With the rising complexities in ship operations and the need for skilled navigators, ship bridge simulators have emerged as crucial tools for hands-on training.

Governments and maritime regulatory authorities worldwide have been emphasizing the importance of competent crew training and the use of simulators to improve ship handling skills. According to the International Maritime Organization (IMO), the application of simulators for training purposes is mandated under the Standards of Training, Certification, and Watchkeeping (STCW) convention.

The STCW convention sets the standards for the training and certification of seafarers and mandates the use of simulators to provide realistic and efficient training, ensuring safe navigation and ship operation. The global shipping industry has witnessed a surge in the demand for skilled navigators capable of maneuvering vessels in various challenging conditions.

Ship bridge simulators offer a risk-free environment to practice ship handling in complex scenarios, such as adverse weather conditions, narrow channels, and congested ports. The increasing emphasis on safe navigation, fuel efficiency, and reduced environmental impact has further amplified the demand for comprehensive ship handling training.

High Initial Investment Costs and Limited Accessibility in Developing Regions

One of the primary restraints faced by the ship bridge simulator market is the high initial investment costs associated with the procurement and installation of advanced simulator systems. The sophisticated simulators require state-of-the-art hardware and software components to create a realistic and immersive training environment.

Additionally, the cost of maintaining and updating these systems can be substantial, adding to the overall expenses for simulator operators. According to a report by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), the initial investment for a full mission ship bridge simulator can range from US$ 2 million to US$ 5 million, depending on the complexity and features of the system. The respective significant upfront cost often deters smaller maritime training institutes and developing countries from investing in such advanced simulator technologies.

Another significant restraint for the ship bridge simulator market is the limited accessibility and penetration of simulators in developing regions. While developed countries have established well-equipped maritime training facilities, many developing nations lack the necessary infrastructure and funding to invest in advanced simulator systems.

The respective creates an uneven distribution of simulator training opportunities and hampers the overall market growth. Statistics from the World Bank reveal that maritime training facilities are less prevalent in low-income countries, with only 18% of these countries having access to advanced simulator technologies. In contrast, high-income countries boast an 82% coverage of maritime training facilities equipped with simulators. The respective disparity points to the need for increased support and funding to facilitate the growth of the ship bridge simulator market in developing regions.

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

The COVID-19 pandemic has left an indelible mark on various industries worldwide, and the maritime sector is no exception. The global ship bridge simulator market, which plays a critical role in maritime training and safety, has also felt the effects of the pandemic. Ship bridge simulators are advanced training tools used by maritime professionals to simulate real-life scenarios and enhance their navigation, communication, and decision-making skills.

These simulators replicate the ship's bridge and surrounding environment, offering a safe and cost-effective platform for training in various scenarios, including navigation, ship handling, and emergencies. Government data from maritime regulatory bodies, such as the International Maritime Organization (IMO), can provide valuable insights into the global ship bridge simulator market's growth trends and challenges.

As the pandemic spread globally, travel restrictions and lockdown measures severely impacted maritime training activities. Many training institutions and maritime academies were forced to suspend or reduce their on-site training programs. This disruption in training schedules led to a decline in the demand for ship bridge simulators, affecting the market's growth during the pandemic.

Segment Analysis

The global ship bridge simulator market is segmented based on type, solution, organization size, end-user and region.

Advancements in Technology

Ship bridge simulators are advanced training tools that replicate real-life scenarios and enable maritime professionals to develop essential navigational skills and enhance decision-making abilities in a risk-free environment. Among the various segments of the ship bridge simulator market, interactive ship bridge simulators stand out as a key driver of growth. Interactive ship bridge simulators are sophisticated training systems that provide a realistic and immersive experience for seafarers.

The aforementioned simulators are equipped with cutting-edge technologies, including high-definition displays, advanced navigation systems, and realistic sound effects, to recreate various maritime scenarios accurately. Interactive ship bridge simulators enable trainees to practice ship handling, navigation, and emergency response in a controlled environment, thereby enhancing their skills and confidence before they encounter real-life situations at sea.

The rapid advancements in technology have played a pivotal role in driving the growth of interactive ship bridge simulators. With the integration of state-of-the-art hardware and software components, these simulators offer a highly realistic and interactive training experience. The incorporation of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies has further elevated the level of immersion and engagement, making the training process more effective and enjoyable for trainees.

Geographical Analysis

Booming Maritime Industry in North America

Ship bridge simulators are sophisticated tools that replicate real-life scenarios, offering a safe and controlled environment for training, navigation practice, and emergency response exercises. North America, comprising countries such as U.S. and Canada, has emerged as a key player in the global ship bridge simulator market.

The region's dominant position can be attributed to various factors, including robust maritime infrastructure, a strong emphasis on safety and training standards, and significant investments in maritime education and research. Government sources provide valuable statistics and insights into North America's contribution to the global ship bridge simulator market, showcasing its remarkable growth and importance in the maritime industry.

Further, North America is home to some of the world's busiest and most strategic ports, making it a vital hub for international maritime trade. Ports like Los Angeles, Long Beach, New York-New Jersey, and Vancouver handle massive cargo volumes, facilitating global supply chains and trade networks. According to the United States Census Bureau, the total value of U.S. imports and exports amounted to US$ 4.9 trillion in 2020. The respective thriving maritime trade has fueled the demand for highly skilled and well-trained marine personnel, driving the adoption of ship bridge simulators for efficient training and assessment.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the market include Wartsila, Rheinmetall AG, General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc., AVEVA Group plc, Presagis Canada Inc., ST Engineering, BMT Group Ltd, ARI Simulation, PC Maritime and FORCE TECHNOLOGY.

Why Purchase the Report?

  • To visualize the global ship bridge simulator market segmentation based on type, solution, organization size, end-user and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
  • Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
  • Excel data sheet with numerous data points of ship bridge simulator market-level with all segments.
  • PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
  • Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global ship bridge simulator market report would provide approximately 69 tables, 61 figures and 192 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

  • Manufacturers/ Buyers
  • Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
  • Research Professionals
  • Emerging Companies

Table of Contents

1. Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1. Research Methodology
  • 1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Snippet by Type
  • 3.2. Snippet by Solution
  • 3.3. Snippet by Organization Size
  • 3.4. Snippet by End-User
  • 3.5. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

  • 4.1. Impacting Factors
    • 4.1.1. Drivers
      • 4.1.1.1. Focus on Cost-Effective Training and Technological Advancements
      • 4.1.1.2. Advancements in Maritime Training and Rising Demand for Vessel Maneuvering Skills
    • 4.1.2. Restraints
      • 4.1.2.1. High Initial Investment Costs and Limited Accessibility in Developing Regions
    • 4.1.3. Opportunity
    • 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

  • 5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
  • 5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.3. Pricing Analysis
  • 5.4. Regulatory Analysis

6. COVID-19 Analysis

  • 6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
    • 6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID
    • 6.1.2. Scenario During COVID
    • 6.1.3. Scenario Post COVID
  • 6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
  • 6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
  • 6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
  • 6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
  • 6.6. Conclusion

7. By Type

  • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Type
  • 7.2. Interactive Ship Bridge Simulators*
    • 7.2.1. Introduction
    • 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 7.3. Non-Interactive Ship Bridge Simulators

8. By Solution

  • 8.1. Introduction
    • 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Solution
    • 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Solution
  • 8.2. Live Training*
    • 8.2.1. Introduction
    • 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 8.3. Professional Training
  • 8.4. Constructive Training
  • 8.5. Virtual Training
  • 8.6. System Training
  • 8.7. Game Simulation Training

9. By Organization Size

  • 9.1. Introduction
    • 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Organization Size
  • 9.2. Large Scale Organizations*
    • 9.2.1. Introduction
    • 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 9.3. Medium Scale Organizations
  • 9.4. Small Scale Organizations

10. By End-User

  • 10.1. Introduction
    • 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By End-User
  • 10.2. Marine*
    • 10.2.1. Introduction
    • 10.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 10.3. Educational

11. By Region

  • 11.1. Introduction
    • 11.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
    • 11.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
  • 11.2. North America
    • 11.2.1. Introduction
    • 11.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Solution
    • 11.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 11.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 11.2.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.2.7.1. U.S.
      • 11.2.7.2. Canada
      • 11.2.7.3. Mexico
  • 11.3. Europe
    • 11.3.1. Introduction
    • 11.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Solution
    • 11.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 11.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 11.3.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.3.7.1. Germany
      • 11.3.7.2. UK
      • 11.3.7.3. France
      • 11.3.7.4. Italy
      • 11.3.7.5. Russia
      • 11.3.7.6. Rest of Europe
  • 11.4. South America
    • 11.4.1. Introduction
    • 11.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Solution
    • 11.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 11.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 11.4.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.4.7.1. Brazil
      • 11.4.7.2. Argentina
      • 11.4.7.3. Rest of South America
  • 11.5. Asia-Pacific
    • 11.5.1. Introduction
    • 11.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Solution
    • 11.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 11.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 11.5.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.5.7.1. China
      • 11.5.7.2. India
      • 11.5.7.3. Japan
      • 11.5.7.4. Australia
      • 11.5.7.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 11.6. Middle East and Africa
    • 11.6.1. Introduction
    • 11.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Solution
    • 11.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 11.6.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User

12. Competitive Landscape

  • 12.1. Competitive Scenario
  • 12.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
  • 12.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

13. Company Profiles

  • 13.1. Wartsila*
    • 13.1.1. Company Overview
    • 13.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
    • 13.1.3. Financial Overview
    • 13.1.4. Key Developments
  • 13.2. Rheinmetall AG
  • 13.3. General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
  • 13.4. AVEVA Group plc
  • 13.5. Presagis Canada Inc.
  • 13.6. ST Engineering
  • 13.7. BMT Group Ltd
  • 13.8. ARI Simulation
  • 13.9. PC Maritime
  • 13.10. FORCE TECHNOLOGY

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

14. Appendix

  • 14.1. About Us and Services
  • 14.2. Contact Us