遺伝子組み換え食品安全性試験市場- 世界の産業規模、シェア、動向、機会、予測、食品タイプ別（作物、加工食品、その他）、地域別、競合別、2020-2030F

世界の遺伝子組み換え食品安全性試験市場は、2024年に25億7,000万米ドルと評価され、予測期間中のCAGRは7.70%で2030年には40億1,000万米ドルに達すると予測されています。

遺伝子組み換え（GM）食品安全性試験とは、遺伝子組み換え生物（GMO）を含む、または含む可能性のある食品および農産物の安全性を評価するために使用される一連の科学的・分析的技術およびプロセスを指します。遺伝子組換え食品安全性試験の主な目的は、遺伝子組換え食品の消費に伴う潜在的リスクを評価し、これらの製品が規制基準を満たし、人間の消費にとって安全であり、環境に害を与えないことを保証することです。GM食品安全性試験の重要な側面は、遺伝子組み換え生物に関連する特定のDNA配列とタンパク質の検出と分析です。これらの遺伝的要素を同定し定量化するために、様々な検査方法が用いられます。一般的な手法としては、ポリメラーゼ連鎖反応（PCR）、リアルタイムPCR、酵素結合免疫吸着測定法（ELISA）などがあります。検査の目的は、GM作物に新たに導入された遺伝子が、消費者にリスクをもたらす可能性のあるアレルゲンを産生する可能性があるかどうかを判定することです。これには、遺伝子配列が既知のアレルゲンタンパク質と類似しているかどうかを評価することが含まれます。検査はしばしば、製品が正しく表示されていることを確認するために行われます。多くの地域では、遺伝子組み換え製品と非組み換え製品の表示について厳しい規制があります。

遺伝子組み換え食品とその安全性に対する消費者の意識の高まりと、潜在的な健康リスクと環境リスクに対する懸念から、食品生産者は、特に消費者の要求に応えて、透明性と安全性を確保するための厳格な検査に投資するようになりました。バイオテクノロジーと分析手法の進歩により、遺伝子組み換え食品の安全性検査の精度、効率、費用対効果が向上しました。こうした技術の進歩により、幅広い利害関係者が検査にアクセスしやすくなりました。遺伝子組み換え作物と非組み換え作物が近接して栽培されている地域では、二次汚染のリスクが懸念されます。このため、共存規制の遵守を確認し、製品の純度を確保するための検査が必要となります。食品メーカーや生産者は、製品に未承認のGM成分が含まれることによる製品回収、法的問題、風評被害のリスクを軽減しようと努めています。包括的な安全性試験は、極めて重要なリスク管理戦略です。

主要市場促進要因

技術の進歩

主な市場課題

サンプルの取り扱いと保存

主要市場動向

有機および非遺伝子組み換えラベル

目次

第1章 概要

第2章 調査手法

第3章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第4章 顧客の声

第5章 世界の遺伝子組み換え食品安全性試験市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
  • 金額別
• 市場シェア・予測
  • 食品種別（農作物、加工食品、その他）
  • 地域別
  • 企業別（2024）
• 市場マップ

第6章 アジア太平洋地域の遺伝子組み換え食品安全性試験市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
• 市場シェア・予測
• アジア太平洋地域：国別分析
  • 中国
  • インド
  • オーストラリア
  • 日本
  • 韓国

第7章 欧州の遺伝子組み換え食品安全性試験市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
• 市場シェア・予測
• 欧州：国別分析
  • フランス
  • ドイツ
  • スペイン
  • イタリア
  • 英国

第8章 北米の遺伝子組み換え食品安全性試験市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
• 市場シェア・予測
• 北米：国別分析
  • 米国
  • メキシコ
  • カナダ

第9章 南米の遺伝子組み換え食品安全性試験市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
• 市場シェア・予測
• 南米：国別分析
  • ブラジル
  • アルゼンチン
  • コロンビア

第10章 中東・アフリカの遺伝子組み換え食品安全性試験市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
• 市場シェア・予測
• 中東・アフリカ：国別分析
  • 南アフリカ
  • サウジアラビア
  • アラブ首長国連邦

第11章 市場力学

• 促進要因
• 課題

第12章 市場動向と発展

• 最近の動向
• 製品上市
• 合併と買収

第13章 世界の遺伝子組み換え食品安全性試験市場：SWOT分析

第14章 ポーターのファイブフォース分析

• 業界内の競合
• 新規参入の可能性
• サプライヤーの力
• 顧客の力
• 代替品の脅威

第15章 PESTEL分析

第16章 競合情勢

• Bureau Veritas
• Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
• Emsl Analytical Inc.
• Eurofins Scientific SE
• Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
• Intertek Group Plc
• SGS SA
• Genetic ID NA Inc.
• Assure Quality Limited
• ALS Limited

第17章 戦略的提言

第18章 調査会社について・免責事項

Global Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market was valued at USD 2.57 billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 4.01 billion by 2030 with a CAGR of 7.70% during the forecast period. Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing refers to a set of scientific and analytical techniques and processes used to evaluate the safety of foods and agricultural products that contain or may have met genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The primary goal of GM food safety testing is to assess the potential risks associated with the consumption of GM foods and to ensure that these products meet regulatory standards, are safe for human consumption, and do not harm the environment. A crucial aspect of GM food safety testing involves the detection and analysis of specific DNA sequences and proteins associated with genetically modified organisms. Various testing methods are used to identify and quantify these genetic elements. Common techniques include polymerase chain reaction (PCR), real-time PCR, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Testing aims to determine whether the newly introduced genes in GM crops may produce allergens that could pose a risk to consumers. This involves assessing the genetic sequences for similarities to known allergenic proteins. Testing is often used to ensure that products are correctly labeled. In many regions, there are strict regulations governing the labeling of GM and non-GM products.

Growing consumer awareness of GM foods and their safety, as well as concerns about potential health and environmental risks, have prompted food producers to invest in rigorous testing to ensure transparency and safety, especially in response to consumer demands. Advances in biotechnology and analytical methods have improved the accuracy, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of GM food safety testing. These technological advancements have made testing more accessible to a broader range of stakeholders. In regions where GM and non-GM crops are cultivated in proximity, the risk of cross-contamination is a concern. This necessitates testing to verify compliance with coexistence regulations and ensure product purity. Food manufacturers and producers seek to mitigate the risk of product recalls, legal issues, and reputational damage due to the presence of unapproved GM ingredients in their products. Comprehensive safety testing is a crucial risk management strategy.

Key Market Drivers

Technological Advancements

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Techniques have seen continuous improvements, such as real-time PCR (qPCR) and multiplex PCR. These techniques allow for the rapid and accurate quantification of specific DNA sequences in GM organisms. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies have revolutionized the analysis of genetic material in GM foods. They provide high-throughput sequencing, enabling comprehensive and detailed genetic analysis, including the identification of unknown or unexpected GM elements. Digital PCR (dPCR) is a highly sensitive technique for quantifying target DNA sequences. It offers greater precision and reliability in determining the presence and quantity of GM DNA in a sample. DNA microarrays are used to simultaneously detect multiple GM traits in a single sample. They allow for high-throughput analysis of genetic elements and can identify a wide range of GM components. These point-of-care tests use immunochromatographic techniques to quickly detect the presence of specific GM proteins in a sample. They are user-friendly and provide rapid results, making them suitable for on-site testing.

Key Market Challenges

Sample Handling and Preservation

DNA and proteins, which are commonly targeted in GM food safety testing, are prone to degradation. Inadequate sample handling and preservation can lead to the deterioration of these target molecules, resulting in inaccurate or unreliable test results. Food samples can be complex matrices, containing a wide range of components such as fats, sugars, and enzymes. Improper handling or storage can lead to the degradation of DNA and proteins and may introduce interfering substances that affect the accuracy of testing. Maintaining traceability and proper documentation of sample handling is crucial for regulatory compliance and quality control. Inadequate traceability can lead to questions about the integrity of the sample, especially when it is necessary to retest or confirm results.

Cross-contamination between samples or sample handling equipment can lead to false-positive results, especially when testing for trace amounts of GM material. Proper handling procedures are essential to prevent contamination. Sampling variability can occur when collecting samples from large batches or diverse sources. Ensuring consistent and representative sampling is a challenge in GM food safety testing, as it impacts the reliability of test results. Some GM food safety tests require specific sample sizes and quantities, which can be challenging to obtain, particularly when dealing with small or limited samples. Proper storage conditions, including temperature and humidity control, are vital to preserving sample integrity. Inadequate storage conditions can lead to sample degradation and compromised test accuracy. Samples often need to be transported to testing facilities. The handling and transportation process can introduce additional risks if not executed properly. Ensuring that a sample is well-mixed and homogeneous is essential, especially when testing for GM material that may not be evenly distributed throughout the sample. Inhomogeneity can lead to false-negative results.

Key Market Trends

Organic and Non-GMO Labels

In various countries, regulations and guidelines have been established for the labeling of GM and non-GMO products. To make non-GMO claims, food producers are often required to provide evidence of GM food safety testing to confirm the absence of GM ingredients. The non-GMO and organic labels provide consumers with a clear and easily recognizable way to identify products that meet their preferences. These labels enhance transparency and allow consumers to make informed choices about the food they purchase. Many retailers and food brands have made commitments to offer non-GMO and organic products. To meet these commitments, food manufacturers conduct GM food safety testing to verify the non-GMO status of their products. Using non-GMO and organic labels builds trust between retailers and consumers. These labels reassure consumers that the products they purchase align with their values and dietary preferences. Independent organizations provide non-GMO and organic certifications, often requiring GM food safety testing as part of the verification process. These certifications further support the credibility of non-GMO and organic labels.

Key Market Players

• Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
• Bureau Veritas
• Emsl Analytical Inc.
• Eurofins Scientific SE
• Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
• SGS SA
• Intertek Group Plc
• Genetic ID NA Inc.
• ALS Limited
• Assure Quality Limited

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market, By Food Type:

• Crops
• Processed Foods
• Others

Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market, By region:

• North America
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Mexico
• Asia-Pacific
  • China
  • India
  • South Korea
  • Australia
  • Japan
• Europe
  • Germany
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Spain
  • Italy
• South America
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Colombia
• Middle East & Africa
  • South Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies presents in the Global Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

• Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

• 1.1. Market Definition
• 1.2. Scope of the Market
  • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
  • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
  • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Objective of the Study
• 2.2. Baseline Methodology
• 2.3. Key Industry Partners
• 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
• 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
• 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
• 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Overview of the Market
• 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
• 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
• 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
• 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook

• 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 5.1.1. By Value
• 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 5.2.1. By Food Type (Crops, Processed Foods, Others)
  • 5.2.2. By Region
  • 5.2.3. By Company (2024)
• 5.3. Market Map

6. Asia Pacific Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook

• 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 6.1.1. By Value
• 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 6.2.1. By Food Type
  • 6.2.2. By Country
• 6.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
  • 6.3.1. China Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.2.1. By Food Type
  • 6.3.2. India Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.2.1. By Food Type
  • 6.3.3. Australia Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.2.1. By Food Type
  • 6.3.4. Japan Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 6.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.4.2.1. By Food Type
  • 6.3.5. South Korea Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 6.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.5.2.1. By Food Type

7. Europe Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook

• 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.1.1. By Value
• 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 7.2.1. By Food Type
  • 7.2.2. By Country
• 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
  • 7.3.1. France Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.2.1. By Food Type
  • 7.3.2. Germany Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.2.1. By Food Type
  • 7.3.3. Spain Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.2.1. By Food Type
  • 7.3.4. Italy Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.2.1. By Food Type
  • 7.3.5. United Kingdom Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.2.1. By Food Type

8. North America Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook

• 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.1.1. By Value
• 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 8.2.1. By Food Type
  • 8.2.2. By Country
• 8.3. North America: Country Analysis
  • 8.3.1. United States Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.2.1. By Food Type
  • 8.3.2. Mexico Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.2.1. By Food Type
  • 8.3.3. Canada Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.2.1. By Food Type

9. South America Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook

• 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.1.1. By Value
• 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 9.2.1. By Food Type
  • 9.2.2. By Country
• 9.3. South America: Country Analysis
  • 9.3.1. Brazil Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.2.1. By Food Type
  • 9.3.2. Argentina Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.2.1. By Food Type
  • 9.3.3. Colombia Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.2.1. By Food Type

10. Middle East and Africa Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook

• 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.1.1. By Value
• 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 10.2.1. By Food Type
  • 10.2.2. By Country
• 10.3. MEA: Country Analysis
  • 10.3.1. South Africa Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.2.1. By Food Type
  • 10.3.2. Saudi Arabia Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.2.1. By Food Type
  • 10.3.3. UAE Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.2.1. By Food Type

11. Market Dynamics

• 11.1. Drivers
• 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

• 12.1. Recent Developments
• 12.2. Product Launches
• 12.3. Mergers & Acquisitions

13. Global Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market: SWOT Analysis

14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

• 14.1. Competition in the Industry
• 14.2. Potential of New Entrants
• 14.3. Power of Suppliers
• 14.4. Power of Customers
• 14.5. Threat of Substitute Product

15. PESTLE Analysis

16. Competitive Landscape

• 16.1. Bureau Veritas
  • 16.1.1. Business Overview
  • 16.1.2. Company Snapshot
  • 16.1.3. Products & Services
  • 16.1.4. Financials (In case of listed companies)
  • 16.1.5. Recent Developments
  • 16.1.6. Key Personnel Details
  • 16.1.7. SWOT Analysis
• 16.2. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
• 16.3. Emsl Analytical Inc.
• 16.4. Eurofins Scientific SE
• 16.5. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
• 16.6. Intertek Group Plc
• 16.7. SGS SA
• 16.8. Genetic ID NA Inc.
• 16.9. Assure Quality Limited
• 16.10.ALS Limited

17. Strategic Recommendations

18. About Us & Disclaimer