石油・ガス向け水中モニタリング市場- 世界の産業規模、動向、機会、予測、製品別、通信方式別、海底センサー別、監視システム別、地域別、競合別、2020～2030年

石油・ガス向け水中モニタリングの世界市場規模は2024年に42億9,000万米ドル、予測期間中のCAGRは6.98%で2030年には64億9,000万米ドルに達すると予測されています。

石油・ガス向け水中モニタリング市場は、海洋石油・ガスの探査、生産、輸送における水中環境をリアルタイムかつ継続的に監視するための高度なモニタリング技術、機器、システムの展開を専門とする産業セグメントを指します。この市場には、遠隔操作車両（ROV）、自律型水中車両（AUV）、ソナーシステム、音響センサー、光ファイバーモニタリング、水中ドローンなど、さまざまなソリューションが含まれ、これらはすべて、作業効率の向上、安全性の確保、環境リスクの軽減を目的として設計されています。石油・ガスセクターにおける水中モニタリングの主な目的は、パイプラインの完全性評価、漏水検知、海底インフラのモニタリング、腐食検知、リアルタイムの環境影響分析などです。海洋探査や深海掘削活動が活発化するにつれ、厳しい規制要件、環境持続性への懸念の高まり、運用コスト効率への要求などを背景に、堅牢で技術的に高度なモニタリングシステムへのニーズが高まっています。

市場促進要因

海洋探査・生産活動の増加

環境と安全への関心の高まり

水中モニタリングソリューションの技術進歩

主な市場課題

高い導入コストとメンテナンスコスト

技術的限界とデータトランスミッションの問題

主な市場動向

データ収集強化のための自律型水中航行体（AUV）および無人水中航行体（UUV）の採用拡大

環境モニタリングと規制遵守への注目の高まり

目次

第1章 概要

第2章 調査手法

第3章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第4章 顧客の声

第5章 世界の石油・ガス向け水中モニタリング市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
  • 金額別
• 市場シェア・予測
  • 製品別（遠隔操作型水中探査機（ROV）、無人水中探査機（UUV））
  • 通信方式別（SDMA、FDMA、TDMA、CDMA）
  • 海底センサー別（傾斜計、回転センサー、近接センサー、圧力センサー、その他）
  • 監視システム別（音響センサー、無線センサーネットワーク、衛星無線ナビゲーション）
  • 地域別
• 企業別（2024）
• 市場マップ

第6章 北米の石油・ガス向け水中モニタリング市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
• 市場シェア・予測
• 北米：国別分析
  • カナダ
  • メキシコ

第7章 欧州の石油・ガス向け水中モニタリング市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
• 市場シェア・予測
• 欧州：国別分析
  • 英国
  • イタリア
  • フランス
  • スペイン

第8章 アジア太平洋地域の石油・ガス向け水中モニタリング市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
• 市場シェア・予測
• アジア太平洋地域：国別分析
  • インド
  • 日本
  • 韓国
  • オーストラリア

第9章 南米の石油・ガス向け水中モニタリング市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
• 市場シェア・予測
• 南米：国別分析
  • アルゼンチン
  • コロンビア

第10章 中東・アフリカの石油・ガス向け水中モニタリング市場展望

• 市場規模・予測
• 市場シェア・予測
• 中東・アフリカ：国別分析
  • サウジアラビア
  • アラブ首長国連邦
  • クウェート
  • トルコ

第11章 市場力学

• 促進要因
• 課題

第12章 市場動向と発展

第13章 企業プロファイル

• Aker Solutions ASA
• OMRON Corporation
• KCF Technologies, Inc.
• Siemens AG
• Schlumberger Limited
• Baker Hughes Company
• Force Technologies
• Fugro Group
• Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.,
• BMT Group

第14章 戦略的提言

第15章 調査会社について・免責事項

Global Underwater Monitoring for Oil and Gas Market was valued at USD 4.29 billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 6.49 billion by 2030 with a CAGR of 6.98% during the forecast period. The Underwater Monitoring for Oil and Gas Market refers to the industry segment dedicated to the deployment of advanced monitoring technologies, equipment, and systems for real-time and continuous surveillance of underwater environments in offshore oil and gas exploration, production, and transportation. This market encompasses a range of solutions, including remotely operated vehicles (ROVs), autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), sonar systems, acoustic sensors, fiber optic monitoring, and underwater drones, all designed to enhance operational efficiency, ensure safety, and mitigate environmental risks. The primary objectives of underwater monitoring in the oil and gas sector include pipeline integrity assessment, leak detection, subsea infrastructure monitoring, corrosion detection, and real-time environmental impact analysis. As offshore exploration and deepwater drilling activities increase, the need for robust and technologically advanced monitoring systems grows, driven by stringent regulatory requirements, rising concerns over environmental sustainability, and the demand for operational cost efficiency.

Key Market Drivers

Increasing Offshore Exploration and Production Activities

The global demand for oil and gas continues to rise, driving increased offshore exploration and production (E&P) activities, which in turn fuels the demand for underwater monitoring technologies. As conventional onshore oil and gas reserves decline, companies are shifting their focus toward deepwater and ultra-deepwater reserves, which offer significant untapped potential. Countries such as the United States, Brazil, Norway, and the Gulf nations are investing heavily in offshore fields to enhance production levels, leading to the widespread adoption of underwater monitoring solutions. These technologies play a crucial role in ensuring the efficiency and safety of offshore operations by providing real-time data on underwater conditions, detecting pipeline leaks, and monitoring the integrity of critical infrastructure. The expansion of deep-sea drilling and subsea infrastructure, including subsea wellheads, pipelines, and floating production systems, necessitates advanced monitoring solutions to minimize operational risks and prevent catastrophic failures. Furthermore, as offshore fields mature, there is an increasing need for enhanced reservoir management techniques, which require continuous underwater data collection and analysis. The integration of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), remotely operated vehicles (ROVs), and advanced sonar systems enables real-time decision-making, helping oil and gas operators optimize extraction processes. Governments and regulatory bodies are also tightening safety standards for offshore operations, compelling companies to adopt cutting-edge monitoring technologies to comply with environmental and safety regulations. The shift toward digital oilfield solutions, where data-driven insights optimize asset performance and reduce downtime, further accelerates the adoption of underwater monitoring systems. As exploration moves into deeper waters with harsher conditions, the importance of robust and reliable underwater monitoring technologies will continue to grow, solidifying their role as a critical component of offshore oil and gas operations. Offshore exploration and production activities have been pivotal in meeting global energy demands. As of 2024, offshore oil and gas production accounted for approximately 28% of the world's crude oil output, with the remaining 72% derived from onshore sources.

Rising Environmental and Safety Concerns

Environmental protection and operational safety are paramount concerns in the oil and gas industry, especially in offshore environments where spills, leaks, and structural failures can lead to significant ecological and economic consequences. The growing awareness of the environmental impact of oil spills, methane leaks, and subsea infrastructure degradation has driven increased investment in underwater monitoring technologies. Governments and regulatory bodies worldwide have introduced stringent policies requiring oil and gas operators to implement advanced monitoring solutions to detect and mitigate environmental risks proactively. Technologies such as underwater acoustic sensors, fiber optic monitoring systems, and real-time leak detection software are being deployed to monitor subsea pipelines, wellheads, and drilling platforms continuously. Additionally, environmental agencies and stakeholders are exerting pressure on oil and gas companies to adopt sustainable practices, increasing the demand for proactive underwater monitoring solutions. Companies are leveraging AI-driven data analytics and predictive maintenance technologies to enhance the accuracy of underwater inspections and detect anomalies before they escalate into major incidents. The implementation of real-time monitoring systems reduces the likelihood of environmental hazards by providing instant alerts on potential risks, allowing operators to take preventive measures. Moreover, the push for carbon neutrality and sustainability in the oil and gas sector has led to the development of innovative underwater monitoring techniques that support the industry's transition toward cleaner energy production. With the rising importance of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) compliance, companies that invest in state-of-the-art underwater monitoring solutions gain a competitive advantage by demonstrating their commitment to environmental stewardship and regulatory compliance. As a result, the increasing emphasis on environmental protection and operational safety is a key driver for the widespread adoption of underwater monitoring technologies in the oil and gas industry.

Technological Advancements in Underwater Monitoring Solutions

The rapid advancement of technology in underwater monitoring is revolutionizing the oil and gas industry by enhancing operational efficiency, reducing costs, and improving safety. Innovations in underwater sensors, robotics, AI-powered data analytics, and edge computing have significantly improved the accuracy and reliability of underwater monitoring systems. The development of high-resolution sonar imaging, 3D laser scanning, and advanced acoustic sensing technologies has enabled oil and gas operators to obtain detailed insights into subsea environments, allowing for more precise decision-making. The integration of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) and remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) equipped with high-definition cameras, infrared sensors, and AI-based anomaly detection systems has revolutionized subsea inspections by reducing human intervention and increasing efficiency. The emergence of wireless underwater communication systems and IoT-enabled monitoring devices has facilitated seamless data transmission between subsea assets and onshore control centers, enabling real-time analysis and predictive maintenance. Additionally, cloud-based underwater monitoring platforms allow for centralized data storage and remote access, enhancing collaboration among oil and gas stakeholders. The adoption of machine learning algorithms and digital twin technology further enhances underwater monitoring capabilities by providing predictive insights into equipment performance, pipeline integrity, and reservoir behavior. Furthermore, the miniaturization of sensors and advancements in energy-efficient underwater monitoring devices have extended the lifespan and reliability of monitoring equipment, reducing maintenance costs. As the industry moves toward fully automated and AI-driven subsea monitoring solutions, the demand for cutting-edge underwater monitoring technologies will continue to grow. These technological advancements not only improve operational efficiency but also help oil and gas companies meet regulatory compliance and environmental sustainability goals. The continued evolution of underwater monitoring solutions, driven by advancements in AI, IoT, and robotics, will play a pivotal role in shaping the future of offshore oil and gas operations.

Key Market Challenges

High Deployment and Maintenance Costs

The deployment and maintenance of underwater monitoring systems for the oil and gas sector present a significant financial challenge. Establishing a robust monitoring infrastructure requires sophisticated equipment, such as remotely operated vehicles (ROVs), autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), sensors, and subsea communication networks, all of which demand substantial capital investment. The procurement of these systems involves high upfront costs due to the specialized technology designed to withstand extreme underwater conditions, including high pressure, low temperatures, and corrosive environments. Installation expenses further escalate, as deploying these monitoring solutions necessitates specialized vessels, skilled personnel, and comprehensive planning to ensure optimal placement and functionality. Once installed, maintaining these systems is another costly endeavor, as routine inspections, calibration, and repairs require periodic intervention, often involving costly deep-sea diving operations or the deployment of AUVs and ROVs. Furthermore, harsh marine environments contribute to accelerated wear and tear, leading to frequent equipment replacements and increased operational downtime.

The cost implications are further magnified when systems suffer unexpected failures, requiring urgent intervention and causing potential disruptions in oil and gas extraction processes. Moreover, maintaining communication links between subsea sensors and surface control systems necessitates sophisticated data transmission infrastructure, such as acoustic modems or fiber-optic cables, both of which involve ongoing operational expenses. In regions with deep-sea oil and gas operations, such as the Gulf of Mexico or offshore Brazil, logistical challenges make cost management even more complex, as the distance from onshore facilities increases transportation costs for maintenance personnel and equipment. Another critical aspect is the compliance with regulatory standards, which often necessitate additional investments in system upgrades and monitoring technologies to meet evolving environmental and safety requirements.

The financial burden of these expenses poses a significant challenge, particularly for smaller oil and gas operators with limited capital resources, restricting their ability to invest in comprehensive underwater monitoring solutions. Additionally, cost constraints can hinder the adoption of real-time data analytics and predictive maintenance technologies, which are crucial for optimizing monitoring system performance and minimizing unexpected failures. Without sufficient financial resources, companies may be forced to rely on less advanced monitoring techniques, increasing the risk of environmental hazards and operational inefficiencies. The challenge of cost management is further intensified by fluctuating oil prices, which impact the investment capacity of oil and gas firms, leading to budgetary constraints that delay or limit the deployment of underwater monitoring technologies. In summary, the high costs associated with deploying and maintaining underwater monitoring systems pose a significant challenge to the oil and gas industry, limiting widespread adoption and potentially increasing the risk of environmental incidents due to inadequate monitoring capabilities.

Technical Limitations and Data Transmission Issues

Underwater monitoring for oil and gas operations faces significant technical limitations, particularly in terms of data transmission and real-time communication between subsea monitoring systems and onshore control centers. The underwater environment presents unique challenges for signal propagation, as conventional wireless communication methods, such as radio waves, are ineffective in deep-sea conditions due to rapid signal attenuation. Instead, acoustic communication is commonly used, but it suffers from inherent limitations, including slow data transmission rates, high latency, and vulnerability to signal interference caused by ambient underwater noise, water currents, and varying salinity levels. These limitations hinder the ability to transmit large volumes of real-time data, making it challenging to achieve seamless monitoring and rapid response to potential anomalies. Additionally, fiber-optic cables provide a more reliable alternative for high-speed data transmission, but their deployment is costly and complex, requiring precise installation and regular maintenance to prevent damage from underwater hazards, such as marine life interactions and geological activities. Another technical challenge is the accuracy and reliability of underwater sensors, which are essential for detecting leaks, structural weaknesses, and environmental changes.

Sensors deployed in deep-sea environments must withstand extreme conditions, including intense pressure and corrosive seawater, leading to potential degradation over time. This degradation affects sensor accuracy and necessitates frequent recalibration or replacement, increasing maintenance costs and operational downtime. Moreover, data processing capabilities are often constrained by the limited computational power of underwater monitoring systems, which must operate efficiently in low-energy conditions to extend battery life. This limitation impacts the ability to implement advanced data analytics, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning algorithms for predictive maintenance and real-time anomaly detection. Furthermore, integrating underwater monitoring data with existing oil and gas infrastructure presents interoperability challenges, as different systems may use varying data formats, protocols, and communication standards, requiring additional investments in data integration solutions. The absence of standardized protocols for subsea communication further exacerbates these challenges, making it difficult to achieve seamless data exchange between different monitoring components and onshore facilities. Additionally, in remote offshore locations, reliance on satellite communication for relaying data from offshore platforms to central command centers introduces latency issues and potential data loss, further impacting the effectiveness of real-time decision-making.

The lack of robust cybersecurity measures for underwater monitoring systems also poses a risk, as cyber threats targeting offshore oil and gas operations could compromise data integrity and system functionality, leading to potential safety hazards and operational disruptions. Addressing these technical limitations requires continuous advancements in subsea communication technologies, sensor durability, and data analytics capabilities, all of which demand substantial research and development investments. Until these challenges are mitigated, the efficiency and reliability of underwater monitoring systems for the oil and gas industry will remain constrained, impacting the industry's ability to achieve optimal operational performance and environmental safety.

Key Market Trends

Growing Adoption of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) and Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) for Enhanced Data Collection

The underwater monitoring for oil and gas market is witnessing a transformative shift with the increasing adoption of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) and Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) to enhance data collection, inspection, and surveillance operations. As offshore oil and gas exploration activities expand into deeper and more challenging environments, traditional monitoring methods, such as Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) and human divers, are becoming inefficient, costly, and hazardous. AUVs and UUVs offer a viable alternative by autonomously navigating subsea environments, collecting real-time data on pipeline integrity, wellhead conditions, and environmental factors such as temperature, pressure, and chemical composition of the seabed. The integration of advanced sensors, high-resolution imaging, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning (ML) technologies further enhances their capabilities, enabling predictive maintenance and early detection of potential failures. Furthermore, the reduced human intervention significantly lowers operational risks and costs associated with offshore monitoring. Several industry players are investing in AUV technology to improve efficiency and accuracy in underwater inspections. Companies such as Oceaneering International, Kongsberg Maritime, and Saab AB have developed advanced AUVs capable of executing long-duration missions with minimal supervision. Additionally, energy companies are partnering with technology providers to develop AI-driven analytics platforms that process the vast amounts of data collected by these autonomous systems, leading to improved decision-making and operational efficiency. The increasing reliance on AUVs and UUVs is expected to drive significant advancements in underwater monitoring solutions, with an emphasis on automation, data-driven insights, and enhanced safety protocols in the oil and gas sector.

Increasing Focus on Environmental Monitoring and Regulatory Compliance

The growing emphasis on environmental sustainability and stringent regulatory requirements are driving significant advancements in underwater monitoring technologies for the oil and gas industry. Governments and environmental agencies worldwide are imposing stricter guidelines on offshore exploration, production, and decommissioning activities to mitigate the environmental impact of oil spills, methane emissions, and marine ecosystem disturbances. As a result, oil and gas operators are investing in advanced environmental monitoring solutions to ensure compliance with evolving regulations and improve their environmental stewardship. These monitoring systems include high-resolution sonar imaging, acoustic sensors, remotely deployed environmental sampling devices, and satellite-linked data transmission systems that provide real-time updates on underwater pollution levels, biodiversity impact, and water quality. Additionally, advancements in AI and machine learning enable automated detection of potential ecological threats, allowing companies to take immediate corrective actions. Regulatory frameworks such as the U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) guidelines, the European Union's Marine Strategy Framework Directive, and the International Maritime Organization (IMO) regulations are pushing oil and gas companies to adopt more comprehensive environmental monitoring strategies. Companies are also facing increasing pressure from stakeholders, including investors, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and the general public, to enhance transparency in environmental reporting and implement sustainable operational practices. Furthermore, the rise of carbon-neutral and ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) initiatives is prompting oil and gas companies to explore green technologies such as carbon capture and storage (CCS) in underwater operations. As environmental concerns gain prominence, the underwater monitoring market is expected to witness continuous innovation and expansion, with a strong focus on sustainability, regulatory compliance, and responsible resource management.

Segmental Insights

Product Insights

The Remotely Operated Underwater Vehicles (ROVs) segment held the largest Market share in 2024. The growing adoption of Remotely Operated Underwater Vehicles (ROVs) in the Underwater Monitoring for Oil and Gas Market is primarily driven by the increasing demand for deepwater and ultra-deepwater exploration, coupled with the need for enhanced operational efficiency and safety in offshore environments. As oil and gas companies push into more challenging offshore reserves, conventional diver-based inspection and monitoring methods become impractical due to extreme depths, high-pressure environments, and harsh oceanic conditions. ROVs provide a highly effective alternative, enabling real-time underwater monitoring, pipeline inspection, leak detection, and structural integrity assessments without exposing human divers to hazardous conditions. Technological advancements in autonomous navigation, artificial intelligence (AI), and sensor integration have significantly enhanced ROV capabilities, making them indispensable for oil and gas exploration, production, and maintenance activities. Modern ROVs are equipped with high-resolution cameras, sonar imaging, laser scanning, and advanced data analytics, allowing operators to detect early signs of equipment failure, corrosion, or structural damage, thereby reducing the risk of costly downtime and environmental hazards.

The rising focus on environmental compliance and regulatory mandates has necessitated continuous monitoring of subsea infrastructure to prevent oil spills and ensure adherence to stringent industry standards. Governments and regulatory bodies worldwide are implementing stricter safety and environmental policies, compelling oil and gas operators to invest in advanced underwater monitoring technologies like ROVs. Additionally, the shift toward digitalization and remote operations in the oil and gas sector is fueling the demand for ROVs, as they enable real-time data collection and transmission to onshore control centers, reducing the need for offshore personnel and minimizing operational risks. The integration of AI-driven predictive maintenance and machine learning algorithms further strengthens the role of ROVs in proactive asset management, allowing operators to anticipate and mitigate potential failures before they escalate. The expanding scope of offshore decommissioning projects also contributes to the market's growth, as aging subsea infrastructure requires meticulous inspection and dismantling, a task efficiently performed by ROVs. Moreover, the ongoing development of next-generation electric and hybrid ROVs with enhanced battery life and reduced carbon footprint aligns with the industry's push toward sustainable and cost-effective solutions.

The rising investments in offshore energy projects, including deep-sea oilfields and subsea pipeline networks, are expected to further drive the adoption of ROVs for underwater monitoring applications. As global energy demand continues to rise, oil and gas operators are increasingly leveraging advanced underwater robotics and automation to enhance operational resilience and optimize resource extraction. Consequently, the increasing reliance on ROVs for real-time subsea surveillance, predictive analytics, and environmental monitoring underscores their pivotal role in shaping the future of underwater monitoring in the oil and gas sector.

Regional Insights

The North America region held the largest market share in 2024. The underwater monitoring for oil and gas market in North America is primarily driven by the increasing demand for offshore oil and gas exploration, stringent environmental regulations, and advancements in underwater monitoring technologies. As North America continues to focus on enhancing its energy security, offshore exploration and production (E&P) activities in regions such as the Gulf of Mexico and offshore Canada are expanding, necessitating robust underwater monitoring systems to ensure operational efficiency and environmental compliance. Regulatory bodies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) have imposed strict guidelines on offshore drilling activities, compelling oil and gas operators to invest in advanced monitoring technologies to mitigate risks related to oil spills, methane leaks, and subsea infrastructure integrity. Additionally, the region is witnessing an increasing adoption of real-time data analytics, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning (ML) in underwater monitoring, allowing operators to enhance predictive maintenance, optimize asset performance, and reduce downtime.

The integration of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) and remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) equipped with high-resolution imaging, sonar, and sensors further strengthens the market by enabling continuous, real-time monitoring of subsea assets and pipelines. Moreover, the growing emphasis on environmental sustainability and carbon footprint reduction in the oil and gas industry has led to the adoption of advanced underwater leak detection and emissions monitoring solutions. The push toward digitization and automation in offshore operations is also a significant driver, with companies leveraging Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled underwater monitoring systems for improved operational visibility and risk management. Furthermore, the increasing prevalence of deepwater and ultra-deepwater exploration activities in North America necessitates the deployment of sophisticated monitoring technologies to navigate the complex and high-pressure underwater environments. Investments by key market players in research and development (R&D) to enhance the efficiency and reliability of underwater monitoring equipment, along with government initiatives promoting offshore oil and gas sustainability, are further contributing to market growth.

The region's strong presence of major oil and gas companies, along with technological advancements in subsea monitoring, is accelerating the adoption of underwater monitoring solutions, ensuring safety, regulatory compliance, and optimized offshore production. Additionally, concerns over aging subsea infrastructure and the need for pipeline integrity assessment are driving demand for underwater inspection and monitoring solutions. With increasing collaborations between oil and gas operators, technology providers, and research institutions, the market is poised for significant growth, fueled by the ongoing transformation toward smarter and more resilient offshore operations in North America.

Key Market Players

Aker Solutions ASA

OMRON Corporation

KCF Technologies, Inc.

Siemens AG

Schlumberger Limited

Baker Hughes Company

Force Technologies

Fugro Group

Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.,

BMT Group

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market, By Product:

• Remotely Operated Underwater Vehicles (ROVs)
• Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs)

Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market, By Communication Method:

• SDMA
• FDMA
• TDMA
• CDMA

Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market, By Subsea Sensor:

• Inclinometers
• Rotation Sensors
• Proximity Sensors
• Pressure Sensors
• Others

Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market, By Monitoring System:

• Acoustic Sensors
• Wireless Sensors Network
• Satellite Radio Navigation

Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market, By Region:

• North America
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Mexico
• Europe
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Italy
  • Germany
  • Spain
• Asia-Pacific
  • China
  • India
  • Japan
  • Australia
  • South Korea
• South America
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Colombia
• Middle East & Africa
  • South Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE
  • Kuwait
  • Turkey

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies presents in the Global Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market report with the given Market data, Tech Sci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

Detailed analysis and profiling of additional Market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

• 1.1. Market Definition
• 1.2. Scope of the Market
  • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
  • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
• 1.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Objective of the Study
• 2.2. Baseline Methodology
• 2.3. Formulation of the Scope
• 2.4. Assumptions and Limitations
• 2.5. Sources of Research
  • 2.5.1. Secondary Research
  • 2.5.2. Primary Research
• 2.6. Approach for the Market Study
  • 2.6.1. The Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.6.2. The Top-Down Approach
• 2.7. Methodology Followed for Calculation of Market Size & Market Shares
• 2.8. Forecasting Methodology
  • 2.8.1. Data Triangulation & Validation

3. Executive Summary

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook

• 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 5.1.1. By Value
• 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 5.2.1. By Product (Remotely Operated Underwater Vehicles (ROVs), Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs))
  • 5.2.2. By Communication Method (SDMA, FDMA, TDMA, CDMA)
  • 5.2.3. By Subsea Sensor (Inclinometers, Rotation Sensors, Proximity Sensors, Pressure Sensors, Others)
  • 5.2.4. By Monitoring System (Acoustic Sensors, Wireless Sensors Network, Satellite Radio Navigation)
  • 5.2.5. By Region
• 5.3. By Company (2024)
• 5.4. Market Map

6. North America Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook

• 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 6.1.1. By Value
• 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 6.2.1. By Product
  • 6.2.2. By Communication Method
  • 6.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
  • 6.2.4. By Monitoring System
  • 6.2.5. By Country
• 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
  • 6.3.1. United States Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook
    • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.2.1. By Product
      • 6.3.1.2.2. By Communication Method
      • 6.3.1.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
      • 6.3.1.2.4. By Monitoring System
  • 6.3.2. Canada Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook
    • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.2.1. By Product
      • 6.3.2.2.2. By Communication Method
      • 6.3.2.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
      • 6.3.2.2.4. By Monitoring System
  • 6.3.3. Mexico Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook
    • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.2.1. By Product
      • 6.3.3.2.2. By Communication Method
      • 6.3.3.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
      • 6.3.3.2.4. By Monitoring System

7. Europe Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook

• 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.1.1. By Value
• 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 7.2.1. By Product
  • 7.2.2. By Communication Method
  • 7.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
  • 7.2.4. By Monitoring System
  • 7.2.5. By Country
• 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
  • 7.3.1. Germany Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook
    • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.2.1. By Product
      • 7.3.1.2.2. By Communication Method
      • 7.3.1.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
      • 7.3.1.2.4. By Monitoring System
  • 7.3.2. United Kingdom Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook
    • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.2.1. By Product
      • 7.3.2.2.2. By Communication Method
      • 7.3.2.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
      • 7.3.2.2.4. By Monitoring System
  • 7.3.3. Italy Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook
    • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.2.1. By Product
      • 7.3.3.2.2. By Communication Method
      • 7.3.3.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
      • 7.3.3.2.4. By Monitoring System
  • 7.3.4. France Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook
    • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.2.1. By Product
      • 7.3.4.2.2. By Communication Method
      • 7.3.4.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
      • 7.3.4.2.4. By Monitoring System
  • 7.3.5. Spain Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook
    • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.2.1. By Product
      • 7.3.5.2.2. By Communication Method
      • 7.3.5.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
      • 7.3.5.2.4. By Monitoring System

8. Asia-Pacific Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook

• 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.1.1. By Value
• 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 8.2.1. By Product
  • 8.2.2. By Communication Method
  • 8.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
  • 8.2.4. By Monitoring System
  • 8.2.5. By Country
• 8.3. Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis
  • 8.3.1. China Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook
    • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.2.1. By Product
      • 8.3.1.2.2. By Communication Method
      • 8.3.1.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
      • 8.3.1.2.4. By Monitoring System
  • 8.3.2. India Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook
    • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.2.1. By Product
      • 8.3.2.2.2. By Communication Method
      • 8.3.2.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
      • 8.3.2.2.4. By Monitoring System
  • 8.3.3. Japan Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook
    • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.2.1. By Product
      • 8.3.3.2.2. By Communication Method
      • 8.3.3.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
      • 8.3.3.2.4. By Monitoring System
  • 8.3.4. South Korea Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook
    • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.2.1. By Product
      • 8.3.4.2.2. By Communication Method
      • 8.3.4.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
      • 8.3.4.2.4. By Monitoring System
  • 8.3.5. Australia Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook
    • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.2.1. By Product
      • 8.3.5.2.2. By Communication Method
      • 8.3.5.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
      • 8.3.5.2.4. By Monitoring System

9. South America Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook

• 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.1.1. By Value
• 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 9.2.1. By Product
  • 9.2.2. By Communication Method
  • 9.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
  • 9.2.4. By Monitoring System
  • 9.2.5. By Country
• 9.3. South America: Country Analysis
  • 9.3.1. Brazil Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook
    • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.2.1. By Product
      • 9.3.1.2.2. By Communication Method
      • 9.3.1.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
      • 9.3.1.2.4. By Monitoring System
  • 9.3.2. Argentina Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook
    • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.2.1. By Product
      • 9.3.2.2.2. By Communication Method
      • 9.3.2.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
      • 9.3.2.2.4. By Monitoring System
  • 9.3.3. Colombia Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook
    • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.2.1. By Product
      • 9.3.3.2.2. By Communication Method
      • 9.3.3.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
      • 9.3.3.2.4. By Monitoring System

10. Middle East and Africa Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook

• 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.1.1. By Value
• 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 10.2.1. By Product
  • 10.2.2. By Communication Method
  • 10.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
  • 10.2.4. By Monitoring System
  • 10.2.5. By Country
• 10.3. Middle East and Africa: Country Analysis
  • 10.3.1. South Africa Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook
    • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.2.1. By Product
      • 10.3.1.2.2. By Communication Method
      • 10.3.1.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
      • 10.3.1.2.4. By Monitoring System
  • 10.3.2. Saudi Arabia Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook
    • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.2.1. By Product
      • 10.3.2.2.2. By Communication Method
      • 10.3.2.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
      • 10.3.2.2.4. By Monitoring System
  • 10.3.3. UAE Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook
    • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.2.1. By Product
      • 10.3.3.2.2. By Communication Method
      • 10.3.3.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
      • 10.3.3.2.4. By Monitoring System
  • 10.3.4. Kuwait Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook
    • 10.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.4.2.1. By Product
      • 10.3.4.2.2. By Communication Method
      • 10.3.4.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
      • 10.3.4.2.4. By Monitoring System
  • 10.3.5. Turkey Underwater Monitoring For Oil and Gas Market Outlook
    • 10.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.5.2.1. By Product
      • 10.3.5.2.2. By Communication Method
      • 10.3.5.2.3. By Subsea Sensor
      • 10.3.5.2.4. By Monitoring System

11. Market Dynamics

• 11.1. Drivers
• 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

13. Company Profiles

• 13.1. Aker Solutions ASA
  • 13.1.1. Business Overview
  • 13.1.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 13.1.3. Recent Developments
  • 13.1.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 13.1.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 13.2. OMRON Corporation
  • 13.2.1. Business Overview
  • 13.2.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 13.2.3. Recent Developments
  • 13.2.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 13.2.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 13.3. KCF Technologies, Inc.
  • 13.3.1. Business Overview
  • 13.3.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 13.3.3. Recent Developments
  • 13.3.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 13.3.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 13.4. Siemens AG
  • 13.4.1. Business Overview
  • 13.4.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 13.4.3. Recent Developments
  • 13.4.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 13.4.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 13.5. Schlumberger Limited
  • 13.5.1. Business Overview
  • 13.5.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 13.5.3. Recent Developments
  • 13.5.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 13.5.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 13.6. Baker Hughes Company
  • 13.6.1. Business Overview
  • 13.6.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 13.6.3. Recent Developments
  • 13.6.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 13.6.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 13.7. Force Technologies
  • 13.7.1. Business Overview
  • 13.7.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 13.7.3. Recent Developments
  • 13.7.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 13.7.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 13.8. Fugro Group
  • 13.8.1. Business Overview
  • 13.8.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 13.8.3. Recent Developments
  • 13.8.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 13.8.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 13.9. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.,
  • 13.9.1. Business Overview
  • 13.9.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 13.9.3. Recent Developments
  • 13.9.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 13.9.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 13.10. BMT Group
  • 13.10.1. Business Overview
  • 13.10.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 13.10.3. Recent Developments
  • 13.10.4. Key Personnel/Key Contact Person
  • 13.10.5. Key Product/Services Offered

14. Strategic Recommendations

15. About Us & Disclaimer