![]() |
市場調査レポート
商品コード
1806547
ポイントオブケア検査市場:製品タイプ、検査タイプ、サンプルタイプ、技術、携帯性、購入形態、用途、エンドユーザー、流通チャネル別-2025-2030年世界予測Point of Care Testing Market by Product, Test Type, Sample Type, Technology, Portability, Mode of Purchase, Application, End User, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2030 |
||||||
カスタマイズ可能
適宜更新あり
|
ポイントオブケア検査市場:製品タイプ、検査タイプ、サンプルタイプ、技術、携帯性、購入形態、用途、エンドユーザー、流通チャネル別-2025-2030年世界予測 |
出版日: 2025年08月28日
発行: 360iResearch
ページ情報: 英文 195 Pages
納期: 即日から翌営業日
|
ポイントオブケア検査市場は、2024年には328億7,000万米ドルとなり、2025年には371億3,000万米ドル、CAGR13.19%で成長し、2030年には691億7,000万米ドルに達すると予測されています。
主な市場の統計 | |
---|---|
基準年2024 | 328億7,000万米ドル |
推定年2025 | 371億3,000万米ドル |
予測年2030 | 691億7,000万米ドル |
CAGR(%) | 13.19% |
ポイント・オブ・ケア検査は、タイムリーな臨床意思決定を患者に近づけることで、診断学の形を変え続けています。本イントロダクションでは、分散型診断、デジタル接続、治療意思決定支援の融合に重点を置きながら、POC検査エコシステムの現代的な輪郭を概説します。医療システムが迅速なトリアージ、バリュー・ベース・ケア、外来患者管理を優先する中、ポイント・オブ・ケアのモダリティは、臨床的な待ち時間を短縮し、患者体験を向上させる能力についてますます評価されるようになっています。
ポイントオブケア検査の情勢は、テクノロジー、ケアデリバリーモデル、そして患者の期待に後押しされ、変革の時を迎えています。第一に、技術的軌跡は単分析の迅速検査から多重化されたプラットフォームと統合された分子ワークフローへと移行しており、必要な時点でより広範な診断が可能になっています。同時に、センサーの小型化とマイクロ流体集積化により、サンプル量と所要時間が短縮され、在宅および外来環境での実現可能性が高まっています。
米国による2025年の関税・貿易措置の発動は、POC検査分野のメーカー、サプライヤー、エンドユーザーにとって複雑な影響をもたらします。コンポーネント、消耗品、完成機器に対する関税は、グローバルサプライチェーンに依存する製品の陸揚げコストを上昇させ、調達戦略や再注文のタイミングに影響を与える可能性があります。多くの機器や試薬には、複数の地域から調達された電子部品、プラスチック、精密機械加工部品が組み込まれているため、関税によるコスト上昇は、特定のサブコンポーネントの原産地によって不均一になりがちです。
セグメンテーションの洞察により、製品カテゴリー、検査タイプ、サンプルマトリックス、テクノロジー、携帯性オプション、購入モード、アプリケーション、エンドユーザー、流通チャネルが、どのように需要パターンと開発の優先順位を形成しているかが明らかになります。製品セグメンテーションの中では、消耗品、サービスとソフトウェア、機器と分析装置、試薬とアッセイがそれぞれ個別の意味を持っています。消耗品、アクセサリー、サービスのメンテナンスとキャリブレーション、ソフトウェアと接続性は継続的な収益源と業務の継続性を支え、ベンチトップ分析装置、分子プラットフォーム、ポータブル分析装置、リーダーとスキャナーは導入シナリオと臨床ワークフローを決定し、グルコース検査ストリップ、血液学試薬、免疫測定試薬、ラテラルフローアッセイ試薬、分子アッセイキットはアッセイ特有のサプライチェーンと品質保証の要件を促進します。
地域的なニュアンスは、POC検査がどのように設計され、展開され、償還されるかに大きく影響し、アメリカ、欧州、中東・アフリカ、アジア太平洋はそれぞれ異なる市場促進要因や運用上の考慮事項を示しています。南北アメリカでは、医療制度が外来患者ケアの最適化と慢性疾患管理を重視しており、診療所と自宅の両方の環境で遠隔モニタリングと迅速な心血管・代謝検査をサポートする機器と測定法に対する需要を生み出しています。この地域の流通ネットワークは、統合されたサプライチェーンと地域に密着したサービスサポートを優先しており、強力なアフターサービスと主要な電子カルテとのデータ相互運用性を実証できるメーカーが有利です。
POC検査の競合情勢は、戦略的パートナーシップ、プラットフォームの差別化、機器、消耗品、ソフトウェアを組み合わせた統合ソリューションへの注力によって特徴付けられています。主要企業は、複数のアッセイ形式をサポートするモジュラープラットフォームアーキテクチャを優先し、より迅速なアッセイ展開と、消耗品の継続的需要によるライフタイムバリューの向上を可能にしています。同時に、接続性ベンダーや医療ITインテグレーターとの提携は、臨床ワークフローやポピュレーションヘルス・イニシアチブにプラグインするデータリッチな診断結果を提供するために不可欠になりつつあります。
競争力を維持し、臨床的関連性を維持するために、業界のリーダーは、製品開発を業務上の現実や進化するケアモデルと整合させる一連の実行可能なイニシアチブを追求すべきです。第一に、相互運用性とユーザー中心のソフトウェア設計を優先し、臨床医のワークフローや電子カルテにシームレスに統合できるようにすることで、導入時の摩擦を軽減します。第二に、迅速なアッセイの拡張を可能にし、複数のサンプルタイプをサポートするモジュール式プラットフォーム戦略に投資することで、調達チームの柔軟性を高め、複数の機器フットプリントの必要性を低減します。
本分析を支える調査手法は、厳密性、妥当性、再現性を確保するために設計された定性的アプローチと定量的アプローチを統合したものです。1次調査は、実際の使用事例、調達上の制約、アンメットニーズを把握するため、臨床医、検査室責任者、調達担当者、機器メーカーおよび販売業者の上級幹部との詳細なインタビューから構成されました。これらのインタビューは、臨床上の優先事項を製品要件に変換するために、施設レベルの観察とワークフロー統合ポイントの検証によって補完されました。
結論として、ポイント・オブ・ケア検査は、技術的成熟度、ケア提供モデルの変化、政策シフトが診断パスウェイを共同で再定義する変曲点にあります。分散型診断への移行は、アッセイケミストリー、小型化された装置、ソフトウエア接続性の進歩に支えられているが、この移行はまた、運用、規制、サプライチェーンの課題も提起しており、意図的な緩和が必要です。関税措置、調達嗜好の変化、地域的な規制の不均一性は、利害関係者が弾力的な調達、適応可能な製品アーキテクチャ、強固なエビデンスの生成を通じて対処しなければならない複雑性の層を追加します。
The Point of Care Testing Market was valued at USD 32.87 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 37.13 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 13.19%, reaching USD 69.17 billion by 2030.
KEY MARKET STATISTICS | |
---|---|
Base Year [2024] | USD 32.87 billion |
Estimated Year [2025] | USD 37.13 billion |
Forecast Year [2030] | USD 69.17 billion |
CAGR (%) | 13.19% |
Point of care testing continues to reshape diagnostics by bringing timely clinical decision-making closer to the patient. This introduction outlines the contemporary contours of the point of care testing ecosystem, emphasizing the convergence of decentralized diagnostics, digital connectivity, and therapeutic decision support. As health systems prioritize faster triage, value-based care, and outpatient management, point of care modalities are increasingly evaluated for their capacity to reduce clinical latency and improve patient experience.
Advances in miniaturized instrumentation, assay chemistry, and molecular methods now permit a broader range of analytes to be tested outside central laboratories. At the same time, software and connectivity tools are maturing to facilitate result integration with electronic health records and telehealth workflows. These developments are encouraging new use cases within emergency care, chronic disease monitoring, and community screening programs. Consequently, stakeholders across the value chain are recalibrating product development, reimbursement strategies, and distribution models to support rapid adoption while ensuring quality and regulatory compliance.
The landscape of point of care testing is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technology, care delivery models, and patient expectations. First, the technological trajectory is moving from single-analyte rapid tests toward multiplexed platforms and integrated molecular workflows, enabling broader diagnostic breadth at the point of need. Concurrently, sensor miniaturization and microfluidic integration are reducing sample volume and turnaround time, which enhances feasibility for home and ambulatory environments.
Second, care delivery models are evolving: outpatient and community settings are absorbing responsibilities historically held by centralized laboratories, and telemedicine interfaces increasingly rely on near-real-time diagnostics to inform remote consultations. Third, the role of software and connectivity has intensified, with interoperability and cybersecurity becoming prerequisites for clinical adoption. Regulatory pathways are also adapting to accommodate decentralized diagnostics, creating opportunities as well as expectations for robust quality management systems. Finally, patient-centric trends-such as convenience, rapid reassurance, and longitudinal monitoring-are reshaping product design priorities, emphasizing user experience, simplified workflows, and clear result interpretation. Together, these shifts are not incremental but collectively redefine procurement decisions, clinical pathways, and competitive positioning across the ecosystem.
The imposition of tariffs and trade measures by the United States in 2025 introduces a complex set of effects for manufacturers, suppliers, and end users in the point of care testing space. Tariffs on components, consumables, and finished devices can elevate landed costs for products that rely on global supply chains, thereby influencing procurement strategies and reorder cadence. Since many instruments and reagents incorporate electronic components, plastics, and precision machined parts sourced from multiple geographies, tariff-driven cost escalation tends to be uneven and dependent on the origin of specific subcomponents.
In response to tariff pressures, manufacturers may accelerate regional sourcing strategies, increase vertical integration of critical elements, or relocate certain production activities to tariff-favored jurisdictions. These operational adjustments can mitigate exposure but often require near-term capital and redesign efforts. For healthcare providers and distributors, the cumulative effect of tariffs can shift purchasing towards products with more stable supply chain footprints, local assembly, or alternative suppliers offering comparable clinical performance. Pricing adjustments may also influence inventory policies, with stakeholders maintaining higher safety stocks to buffer against potential re-pricing or delays. Importantly, the regulatory and quality assurance implications of sourcing changes necessitate careful validation to ensure clinical equivalence, so organizations must balance cost-containment with the need to preserve test accuracy and continuity of care.
Segmentation insights reveal how distinct product categories, test types, sample matrices, technologies, portability options, purchase modes, applications, end users, and distribution channels shape demand patterns and development priorities. Within product segmentation, consumables, services and software, instruments and analyzers, and reagents and assays each carry discrete implications: consumables, accessories and service maintenance and calibration, and software and connectivity underpin ongoing revenue streams and operational continuity; benchtop analyzers, molecular platforms, portable analyzers, and readers and scanners determine deployment scenarios and clinical workflows; while glucose test strips, hematology reagents, immunoassay reagents, lateral flow assay reagents, and molecular assay kits drive assay-specific supply chain and quality assurance requirements.
When viewed through test-type segmentation, the breadth from blood gases to infectious disease and molecular diagnostics affects instrument selection and clinician training, with cardiac markers and hematology requiring specialized assay robustness and coagulation testing demanding precise calibration and control across activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen level, and prothrombin time and international normalized ratio assays. Infectious disease testing spans gastrointestinal, respiratory, and sexually transmitted infection panels, each influencing throughput needs and biosafety considerations. Sample-type segmentation, including blood, nasal and swab samples, saliva, and urine, informs collection device design, patient acceptability, and pre-analytical stability requirements. Technology segmentation differentiates biosensor electrochemical approaches, colorimetric platforms, immunoassays, lateral flow assays-spanning antibody, antigen, and multiplex formats-microfluidics, and PCR and molecular technologies, with each imparting trade-offs between sensitivity, specificity, cost, and operational complexity.
Portability options distinguish benchtop fixed analyzers from portable handheld devices, aligning device footprint with intended point of care settings. Mode of purchase segmentation separates over-the-counter accessibility from prescription-based dispensing, shaping labeling, user instructions, and post-market surveillance obligations. Application-driven segmentation-from chronic disease management to emergency and critical care, infectious disease diagnosis, occupational testing, oncology monitoring, and women's health-dictates performance thresholds and integration requirements with clinical care pathways. End-user segmentation that includes ambulatory care centers, diagnostic laboratories, free-standing emergency departments, home care, hospitals and clinics, and urgent care centers emphasizes differences in staffing, regulatory oversight, and capital acquisition processes. Finally, distribution channel segmentation across offline and online pathways, with offline methods such as direct sales, distributor and wholesale, and retail and pharmacy, impacts go-to-market strategies, margin structures, and customer support models. Taken together, these segmentation lenses provide a multifaceted view that guides product roadmaps, commercialization priorities, and lifecycle planning.
Regional nuances significantly influence how point of care testing is designed, deployed, and reimbursed, with the Americas, Europe, Middle East and Africa, and Asia-Pacific each presenting distinct market drivers and operational considerations. In the Americas, health systems emphasize outpatient care optimization and chronic disease management, creating demand for devices and assays that support remote monitoring and rapid cardiovascular and metabolic testing in both clinic and home settings. Distribution networks in this region prioritize integrated supply chains and localized service support, which favors manufacturers that can demonstrate robust after-sales service and data interoperability with dominant electronic health records.
Europe, Middle East and Africa exhibit heterogeneity in regulatory regimes and healthcare infrastructure, with pockets of high regulatory rigor coexisting with areas where access barriers remain. This diversity requires adaptable product configurations and flexible pricing models. Interoperability standards and data privacy frameworks are especially influential in regulatory decision-making and clinical adoption in Europe, while capacity building and decentralized solutions are prioritized in many parts of the Middle East and Africa. In Asia-Pacific, rapid urbanization, expanding primary care networks, and high-volume public health screening initiatives drive demand for scalable, cost-effective point of care solutions. Regional manufacturing capabilities and supplier ecosystems in Asia-Pacific often accelerate product iteration cycles, and partnerships with local distributors are critical to achieve penetration across varied healthcare settings. Across all regions, reimbursement pathways, regulatory timelines, and customer training imperatives shape adoption velocity and product design choices.
Competitive dynamics within the point of care testing landscape are characterized by strategic partnerships, platform differentiation, and a focus on integrated solutions that combine instruments, consumables, and software. Leading companies are prioritizing modular platform architectures that support multiple assay formats, enabling faster assay rollouts and improved lifetime value through recurring consumable demand. Concurrently, alliances with connectivity vendors and health IT integrators are becoming essential to deliver data-rich diagnostic results that plug into clinical workflows and population health initiatives.
Innovation strategies vary by firm, with some investing heavily in molecular and microfluidic technologies to expand the diagnostic menu, while others concentrate on low-cost lateral flow and biosensor technologies optimized for point-of-care ease of use. Service offerings, including field maintenance, calibration, and software updates, are being redefined as a competitive differentiator, and companies that can demonstrate rapid support turnaround and robust quality systems tend to secure larger institutional contracts. Supply chain resilience and localized manufacturing capabilities have also risen in strategic importance, prompting acquisitions and joint ventures to reduce exposure to global logistics disruptions. Finally, commercial models are shifting toward subscription and outcomes-based arrangements in select accounts, aligning vendor incentives with clinical performance and operational uptime.
To remain competitive and clinically relevant, industry leaders should pursue a set of actionable initiatives that align product development with operational realities and evolving care models. First, prioritize interoperability and user-centered software design so that devices integrate seamlessly into clinician workflows and electronic health records, thereby reducing friction at the point of adoption. Second, invest in modular platform strategies that allow rapid assay expansion and support multiple sample types, which increases flexibility for procurement teams and reduces the need for multiple device footprints.
Third, strengthen supply chain resilience through strategic regional sourcing, dual sourcing of critical components, and validated local assembly where feasible, which mitigates exposure to trade disruptions and tariff-driven cost pressures. Fourth, enhance post-market service offerings-particularly field maintenance and remote diagnostics-to preserve instrument uptime and protect clinical continuity. Fifth, adopt evidence-generation strategies that emphasize real-world performance, workflow impact, and patient-centric outcomes, thereby supporting payer discussions and clinical adoption. Finally, explore alternative commercial models, such as managed service agreements or outcome-linked contracts, to better align with healthcare purchasers' objectives and to create predictable revenue streams. Executing these actions with clear accountability and staged milestones will help firms convert technical capabilities into durable market advantage.
The research methodology underpinning this analysis integrates qualitative and quantitative approaches designed to ensure rigor, relevance, and reproducibility. Primary research consisted of in-depth interviews with clinicians, laboratory directors, procurement officers, and senior executives across device manufacturers and distributors to capture real-world use cases, procurement constraints, and unmet needs. These interviews were complemented by facility-level observations and validation of workflow integration points to translate clinical priorities into product requirements.
Secondary research included a systematic review of peer-reviewed clinical literature, regulatory guidance documents, industry standards for quality management and interoperability, and technical white papers describing assay and platform performance. Data triangulation techniques were employed to reconcile insights from diverse sources and to validate assumptions about operational behaviors and adoption barriers. The research also applied scenario analysis to assess supply chain risk and regulatory sensitivity, and key findings were stress-tested through expert panels to refine recommendations. Throughout, the methodology emphasized transparency, with audit trails linking conclusions to source materials and interview excerpts, ensuring that stakeholders can trace analytic judgments back to empirical evidence.
In conclusion, point of care testing is at an inflection point where technological maturity, changing care delivery models, and policy shifts are jointly redefining diagnostic pathways. The move toward decentralized diagnostics is supported by advances in assay chemistry, miniaturized instrumentation, and software connectivity, yet this transition also raises operational, regulatory, and supply chain challenges that require deliberate mitigation. Tariff actions, shifting procurement preferences, and regional regulatory heterogeneity add layers of complexity that stakeholders must address through resilient sourcing, adaptable product architectures, and robust evidence generation.
For manufacturers, the imperative is to deliver clinically rigorous, easy-to-use platforms that integrate seamlessly into workflows while offering sustainable service and supply models. For providers and payers, the focus should be on harnessing point of care capabilities to improve decision latency and patient experience without sacrificing quality controls. By aligning technology investments, commercial models, and implementation frameworks, stakeholders can realize the promise of point of care testing to deliver meaningful improvements in clinical care and operational efficiency.