お知らせ :東京証券取引所JASDAQスタンダード市場への新規上場に関するお知らせ
株式会社グローバルインフォメーション
表紙:放射線治療の世界市場(2020年の概要)
市場調査レポート
商品コード
983250

放射線治療の世界市場(2020年の概要)

2020 Radiation Therapy Market Summary Report

出版日: | 発行: IMV Medical Information | ページ情報: 英文 203 Pages, 245 Charts & Graphs | 納期: 即日から翌営業日

価格
価格表記: USDを日本円(税抜)に換算
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=111.74円
放射線治療の世界市場(2020年の概要)
出版日: 2020年10月19日
発行: IMV Medical Information
ページ情報: 英文 203 Pages, 245 Charts & Graphs
納期: 即日から翌営業日
  • 全表示
  • 概要
  • 目次
概要

画像診断は、放射線治療部門やがんセンターにとって、がんの診断と病期分類だけでなく、がん患者の治療に使用するための不可欠なツールになっています。ハードウェア機能とソフトウェアアプリケーションの継続的な改善により、画像診断は治療計画、治療計画のシミュレーション、そして最近では癌治療手順中の画像ガイダンスに使用されています。過去10年間で、CT技術は、X線を超えて、画像ガイダンス、治療計画、およびシミュレーションのための第一の画像ツールになり、この分野は他の画像技術の開発とともに進化し続けています。<

当レポートでは、世界の放射線治療市場を調査分析し、外部ビーム治療装置、画像誘導放射線治療(IGRT)、近接照射療法装置、治療計画システム、シミュレーター( X線、CT、PET、およびMRI)および腫瘍学情報システムを含む、癌患者の治療に使用される主要な放射線治療技術の部門全体の概要を提供しています。更に、放射線で治療された上位の癌の種類、患者数、設置された機器、市場シェア、および技術採用率の過去10年間の動向を評価しています。また、放射線治療用のハードウェアおよびソフトウェアソリューションを提供する25社以上のメーカーに関する情報も提供しています。

目次

第1章 目的

第2章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第3章 調査方法

第4章 調査結果

  • A.放射線療法の治療量
  • B.外部ビーム治療装置
  • C.画像誘導放射線治療(IGRT)
  • D.近接照射療法機器
  • E.治療計画システム
  • F.画像診断を使用した治療計画の実践
  • G.シミュレーター(X線、CT、MR、およびPET)
  • H.記録と検証/腫瘍学情報システム
  • i.資本設備予算
  • J.人口統計およびサイト運用の特徴
目次

Imaging has become an essential tool for radiation therapy departments and cancer centers, not only to diagnose and stage where the cancer is, but for use in treating cancer patients. With ongoing improvements in hardware capabilities and software applications, imaging is used for treatment planning, simulating the treatment plan, and more recently, for image guidance during the cancer treatment procedure. Over the past decade, CT technology has become the #1 imaging tool for image guidance, treatment plans, and simulation, surpassing x-ray, and the field is continuing to evolve with the development of other imaging technologies.

IMV's “2020 Radiation Therapy Market Summary Report ” provides a department-wide view of the key radiation therapy technologies used in treating cancer patients, including external beam therapy equipment, image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), brachytherapy equipment, treatment planning systems, simulators (X-ray, CT, PET, and MRI), and oncology information systems. This report monitors trends over the past decade in the top cancer types treated with radiation, patient volume, installed equipment, market share, and technology adoption rates. Future plans for acquiring such technologies are estimated, along with the likely impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on capital budgets for RT equipment. Over 25 manufacturers providing hardware and software solutions for radiation therapy are covered in this report.

The data source for this report is IMV's 2020/21 Radiation Therapy Census Database , which provides comprehensive profiles of hospital and non-hospital sites performing radiation therapy in the United States. This database can be separately licensed by qualified subscribers, and includes contact and site-specific information.

Key Features

Radiation Therapy Treatment Volume

  • Total courses of treatment using radiation therapy from 2006-2020?
  • What is the trend in total annual treatment visits since 2006?
  • What are the top cancer types treated with radiation?
  • What are the key radiation treatment methods provided?
  • What is the trend in the imaging modalities used for radiation therapy treatment plans?

External Beam Installed Base, OEM Share, and Purchase Plans

  • How many external beam units are installed, by facility type (including LINACS and proton therapy)?
  • What type of features are being purchased for external beam units?
  • What is the brand loyalty of current external beam users?
  • What is the likely impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on capital budgets for RT equipment?

Installed Base, OEM Share, and Purchase Plans for Related RT Technology

  • Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT)
  • Brachytherapy remote afterloaders
  • Treatment planning units
  • Simulators (X-ray, CT, PET/CT and MR)
  • Record & Verify / Oncology Information Systems

Site Operations Characteristics

  • How many FTE radiation oncologists, radiation therapists, nurses, physicists, dosimetrists, and secretaries are on staff per site?
  • What is the average number of new patients treated per linear accelerator and per staff type?

Table of Contents

I. Objectives

II. Executive Summary

III. Methodology

IV. Findings

  • A. Radiation Therapy Treatment Volume
  • B. External Beam Therapy Equipment
  • C. Image Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT)
  • D. Brachytherapy Equipment
  • E. Treatment Planning Systems
  • F. Treatment Planning Practices Using Imaging
  • G. Simulators (X-ray, CT, MR, and PET)
  • H. Record & Verify / Oncology Information Systems
  • I. Capital Equipment Budgets
  • J. Demographics & Site Operations Characteristics

EXHIBITS

A. Radiation Therapy Treatment Volume

Radiation Therapy Treatment Visits

  • 1. Total Radiation Therapy Treatment Visit Volume, 2006-2020
  • 2. Distribution of Treatment Visits, by Site Type, 2010-2020
  • 3. Average Treatment Visits per Site, by Site Type, 2020
  • 4. Average Treatment Visits per Site, by Site Type, 2015-2020

Radiation Therapy Courses of Treatment

  • 5. Total Radiation Therapy Courses of Treatment, 2006-2020
  • 6. Ratio of Radiation Therapy Treatment Visits per Course of Treatment, 2010-2020
  • 7. Distribution of Radiation Therapy Sites, Treatment Visits, and Courses of Treatment, by Site Type, 2020
  • 8. Average Annual Radiation Therapy Courses of Treatment per Site, 2020
  • 9. Average Annual Radiation Therapy Courses of Treatment per Site, by Site Type, 2015-2020
  • 10. Total Courses of Treatment, New vs. Prior, 2010-2019
  • 11. Average Annual New Radiation Therapy Courses of Treatment per Site, 2019
  • 12. Average Annual New Radiation Therapy Courses of Treatment per Site, by Site Type, 2015-2019

Radiation Therapy Courses of Treatment, by Cancer Type

  • 13. Distribution of 2019 Courses of Treatment, by Cancer Type Treated
  • 14. Distribution of 2019 Courses of Treatment, by Cancer Type Treated, by Site Type
  • 15. Trend in the Distribution of Courses of Treatment, by Cancer Type Treated, 2010-2019
  • 16. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Performing Courses of Treatment, by Cancer Type, as of 2020 Survey
  • 17. Average Number of 2019 Courses of Treatment Performed per Radiation Therapy Site,
  • 18. Percent of Sites Performing External Beam vs. Brachytherapy Using Remote Afterloaders,
  • 19. Percent of 2019 Courses of Treatment Using External Beam vs. Brachytherapy Using Remote
  • 20. Trend in Percent of Sites Performing External Beam vs. Other Treatment Methods for Prostate Cancer, 2012-2019
  • 21. Trend in Percent of Courses of Treatment Using External Beam vs. Other Treatment Methods for Prostate Cancer, 2012-2019

Radiation Therapy Treatment Methods

  • 22. Trend in the Distribution of External Beam Courses of Treatment vs. Other Types of Radiation Therapy, 2006-2019
  • 23. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Performing Specific Treatment Methods, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 24. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Performing Specific Treatment Methods, Hospitals vs Non-Hospitals, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 25. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Performing Specific Treatment Methods, by Hospital Bed Size, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 26. Trend in Percent of Sites Providing Specific Treatment Methods, by Census Survey Year, 2013/14 to 2020
  • 27. Percent of Sites Currently Providing vs. Planning to Provide Specific Treatment Methods, as of 2020 Census Survey

B. External Beam Therapy Equipment

  • 1. Distribution of Total External Beam Therapy Sites and Units, by Census Survey Year, 2013/14 to 2020
  • 2. Site Type Mix of External Beam Therapy Sites and Units, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 3. Distribution of Sites, by Number of External Beam Therapy Units Installed, by Site Type, 2020 Census Survey
  • 4. Percent Mix of External Beam Therapy Unit Installed Base, by Manufacturer, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 5. Trend in External Beam Therapy Manufacturer Installed Base Share, by Census Survey Year, 2007 to 2020
  • 6. Percent Mix of External Beam Therapy Unit Installed Base, by Manufacturer, by Site Type, 2020 Census Survey
  • 7. Percent of Sites Having at Least One External Beam Therapy Manufacturer Installed, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 8. Proton Therapy System Installed Base Share, by Manufacturer, as of September 2020
  • 9. Proton Therapy System Installed Base Share, by IMV Census Study Year, 2015/16 to 2020
  • 10. External Beam Therapy Unit Installed Base, by Year of Installation, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 11. External Beam Therapy Unit Installed Base Market Share, by Installation Time Frames,
  • 12. Percent of External Beam Therapy Units with Electronic Portal Imaging Capability, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 13. Percent of External Beam Therapy Unit Installed Base with Electronic Portal Imaging, by Census Survey Year, 2003 to 2020
  • 14. Percent of Linear Accelerators with Rotational ARC Therapy Capability, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 15. Percent of Linear Accelerators with Rotational ARC Therapy Capability, by Census Survey Year, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 16. Percent of Linear Accelerator Installed Base with Stereotactic Treatment Capability, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 17. Percent of Linear Accelerators with Stereotactic Treatment Capability, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 18. Distribution of Service Support Sources for External Beam Therapy Units, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 19. Distribution of Service Support Sources for External Beam Therapy Units, by Manufacturer of Installed Units, as of 2020 Census Survey

Planned External Beam Therapy Equipment

  • 20. Radiation Therapy Site Plans for Purchasing External Beam Therapy Units Over the Next Three Years, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 21. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Planning to Purchase External Beam Therapy Units Over the Next Three Years, by Census Survey Year, 2010 to 2020
  • 22. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Planning to Purchase External Beam Therapy Units Over the Next Three Years, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 23. Plans for New vs. Refurbished External Beam Therapy Unit Acquisitions, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 24. Plans for Additional vs. Replacement External Beam Therapy Units, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 25. Current Replacement Cycle for External Beam Therapy Systems, Based on 2020 Radiation Therapy Census Survey Responses
  • 26. Plans for Electronic Portal Imaging, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 27. Plans for Rotational ARC Therapy Capability for Planned Linear Accelerator Acquisitions, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 28. Plans for Using Future Linear Accelerators for Stereotactic Treatments, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 29. Whether Planned Linear Accelerators will be Used for Cranial Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) Treatments, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 30. Whether Planned Linear Accelerators will be Used for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Treatments, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 31. Percent Distribution of Sites Mentioning Manufacturers Being Considered for External Beam Therapy Unit Acquisitions, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 32. Brand Loyalty: External Beam Therapy Vendors Being Considered, by Current External Beam Therapy Installed Base, as of 2020 Census Survey

Image Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT)

Installed Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) Equipment

  • 1. Site Type Mix of Radiation Therapy Sites Providing Image Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT), as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 2. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Providing Image Guided Radiotherapy, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 3. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Providing Image Guided Radiotherapy, by Census Survey Year,
  • 4. Distribution of Sites by Number of Installed IGRT Systems, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 5. Type of Guidance System Used for IGRT, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 6. Type of Guidance System Used for IGRT, by Census Survey Year, 2013/14 to 2020
  • 7. Percent Mix of Total IGRT Imaging Device Installed Base, by Manufacturer, as of
  • 8. Percent Mix of Total IGRT Imaging Device Installed Base, by Manufacturer, by Site Type,
  • 9. Percent of Sites Having at Least One IGRT Manufacturer Installed, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 10. Percent Mix of IGRT Installed Base using CT or Cone Beam CT, by Manufacturer,
  • 11. Percent Mix of IGRT Installed Base using Electronic Portal Imaging, by Manufacturer,
  • 12. Percent Mix of X-ray IGRT Installed Base, by Manufacturer, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 13. Percent Mix of IGRT Installed Base having Surface Guidance (SGRT) Capability, by Manufacturer,
  • 14. Percent Mix of IGRT Installed Base with Portal Imaging Devices using Treatment Beams
  • 15. Percent Mix of IGRT Installed Base using RF or Electromagnetic Transponders,
  • 16. Image Guided Radiotherapy Installed Base, by Year of Installation, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 17. IGRT Installed Base Market Share, by Installation Time Frames, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 18. Radiation Therapy Site Plans for Purchasing IGRT Equipment Over the Next Three Years,
  • 19. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Planning to Purchase IGRT Equipment Over the Next
  • 20. Planned Type of Guidance Systems for IGRT Equipment, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 21. Percent Distribution of Sites Mentioning Manufacturers Being Considered for IGRT Acquisitions, Regardless of Image Guidance Type, as of 2020 Census Survey

C. Brachytherapy Equipment

Installed Brachytherapy Equipment

  • 1. Site Type Mix of Radiation Therapy Sites with Brachytherapy Equipment, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 2. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites with Brachytherapy Equipment, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 3. Brachytherapy Equipment Unit Installed Base and Percent of Sites Having, by Census Survey Year, 2004 to 2020
  • 4. Type of Brachytherapy Equipment Installed, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 5. Percent Mix of Brachytherapy Equipment Installed Base, by Manufacturer, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 6. Percent Mix of Brachytherapy Equipment Installed Base, by Manufacturer, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 7. Percent of Sites Having at Least One Brachytherapy Equipment Manufacturer Installed, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 8. Brachytherapy Equipment Unit Installed Base, by Year of Installation, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 9. Brachytherapy Equipment Installed Base Market Share, by Installation Time Frames, as of 2020 Census Survey

Planned Brachytherapy Equipment

  • 10. Site Type Mix of Radiation Therapy Sites Planning Brachytherapy Equipment Units, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 11. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Planning to Purchase Brachytherapy Equipment Units Over the Next Three Years, by Census Survey Year, 2007 to 2020
  • 12. Type of Brachytherapy Equipment Planned, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 13. Mix of Planned Acquisitions of Low Dose vs. High Dose Remote Afterloaders, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 14. Brachytherapy Applicator Types Being Planned for Purchase, by Sites Currently Performing
  • 15. Percent Distribution of Sites Mentioning Manufacturers Being Considered for Brachytherapy

D. Treatment Planning Systems

Installed Treatment Planning Systems

  • 1. Site Type Mix of Radiation Therapy Sites with Treatment Planning Units, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 2. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites with Treatment Planning Systems, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 3. Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base and Percent of Sites Having, by Census Survey Year, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 4. Distribution of Sites by Number of Treatment Planning Systems Installed, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 5. Percent Mix of Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base, by Manufacturer, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 6. Percent Mix of Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base, by Manufacturer, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 7. Trend in Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base Share, by Manufacturer, by Census Survey
  • 8. Percent of Sites Having Treatment Planning System Manufacturers, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 9. Treatment Planning Hardware/Server Installed Base, by Year of Installation,
  • 10. Treatment Planning Hardware/Server Installed Base Market Share, by Installation Time Frames, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 11. Distribution of Sites, by Number of Treatment Planning Seats Installed, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 12. Average Number of Treatment Planning Seats Installed per Site and per Treatment Planning
  • 13. Mix of 2D, 3D, and 4D Treatment Planning Units, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 14. Mix of 2D, 3D, and 4D Treatment Planning Units, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 15. Distribution of Installed Base of 2D, 3D, and 4D Treatment Planning Units, by Census Survey
  • 16. Percent Mix of 2D Treatment Planning Units, by Manufacturer, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 17. Percent Mix of 3D Treatment Planning Units, by Manufacturer, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 18. Percent Mix of 4D Treatment Planning Units, by Manufacturer, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 19. Current Uses of Treatment Planning Units, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 20. Current Uses of External Beam Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 21. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Used for External Beam Therapy, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 22. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Used for External Beam Therapy, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 23. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Used for External Beam Therapy, by Census Survey Year, 2012 to 2020
  • 24. Percent Mix of Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base Used for External Beam Therapy, by Manufacturer, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 25. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Providing Planning for Electron Therapy, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 26. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Providing Planning for Electron Therapy, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 27. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Providing Planning for Electron Therapy, by Census Survey Year, from 2007 to 2020
  • 28. Percent Mix of Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base Providing Planning for Electron
  • 29. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Used for Brachytherapy with Remote Afterloaders, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 30. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Used for Brachytherapy with Remote Afterloaders, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 31. Trend in Percent of Treatment Planning Units Used for Brachytherapy with Remote Afterloaders, by Census Survey Year, 2012 to 2020
  • 32. Percent Mix of Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base Used for Brachytherapy with Remote Afterloaders, by Manufacturer, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 33. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Used for Prostate Seed Therapy, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 34. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Used for Prostate Seed Therapy, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 35. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Used for Prostate Seed Therapy, by Census Survey Year, 2012 to 2020
  • 36. Percent Mix of Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base Used for Prostate Seed Therapy, by Manufacturer, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 37. Percent of External Beam Treatment Planning Units with Inverse Planning Capability, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 38. Percent of External Beam Treatment Planning Units with Inverse Planning Capability, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 39. Percent of External Beam Treatment Planning Units with Inverse Planning Capability, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 40. Percent Mix of External Beam Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base with Inverse Planning Capability, by Manufacturer, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 41. Percent of External Beam Treatment Planning Units Being Used to Plan for Image-Guided IMRT, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 42. Percent of External Beam Treatment Planning Units Being Used for Image-Guided IMRT, by Census Survey Year, from 2012 to 2020
  • 43. Percent of External Beam Treatment Planning Units Being Used for Image-Guided IMRT, by by Manufacturer, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 44. Percent Mix of External Beam Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base Being Used for Image-Guided IMRT, by Manufacturer, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 45. Percent of External Beam Treatment Planning Units Being Used for Rotational ARC Therapy, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 46. Percent of External Beam Treatment Planning Units Being Used for Rotational ARC Therapy, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 47. Percent of External Beam Treatment Planning Units Being Used for Rotational ARC Therapy, by Census Survey Year, 2012 to 2020
  • 48. Percent Mix of External Beam Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base Being Used for 2020 by Census Survey Year, 2012 to 2020 Census Survey

Planned Treatment Planning Systems

  • 49. Radiation Therapy Site Plans for Purchasing Treatment Planning Units Over the Next Three Years, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 50. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Planning to Purchase Treatment Planning Units Over the Next Three Years, by Census Survey Year, 2007 to 2020
  • 51. Type of Treatment Planning Acquisitions Planned, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 52. Plans for Replacement vs. Additional Treatment Planning Systems, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 53. Number of Seats Planned for Future Treatment Planning Systems, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 54. Whether Treatment Planning Acquisition Will be Bundled with the Purchase of a Linear Accelerator, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 55. Planned Uses of Future Treatment Planning Units, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 56. Planned Uses of Future Treatment Planning Units that will be Used for External Beam Therapy, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 57. Trend in Percent of Planned Treatment Planning Units with 3D vs. 4D Capability, by Census Survey Year, 2010 to 2020
  • 58. Percent Distribution of Sites Mentioning Manufacturers Being Considered for Treatment Planning Unit Acquisitions, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 59. Percent Distribution of Sites Mentioning Manufacturers Being Considered for Treatment Planning Unit Acquisitions, by Census Survey Year, 2013/14 to 2020
  • 60. Brand Loyalty: Treatment Planning Manufacturer Being Considered, by Current Treatment Planning Installed Base, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 61. Brand Preference: Treatment Planning Manufacturers Being Used by Current LINAC Installed Base, as of 2020 Census Survey

E. Treatment Planning Practices Using Imaging

  • 1. Trend in Proportion of Treatment Plans Using Images, by Imaging Modality, 2010 to 2019
  • 2. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Using Images in Treatment Plans, by Imaging Modality, by Census Survey Year, 2011 to 2020
  • 3. Distribution of Sites Using Images for Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning, by Imaging Modality, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 4. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Planning to Purchase PET or MR in the Next Three Years, as of 2020 Census Survey

F. Simulators (X-ray, CT, MR, and PET)

Installed Simulators

  • 1. Site Type Mix of Radiation Therapy Sites with Simulators, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 2. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites with Simulators, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 3. Simulator Unit Installed Base and Percent of Sites Having, by Census Survey Year, 2006 to 2020
  • 4. Distribution of Sites by Number of Simulators Installed, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 5. Percent Mix of Simulator Installed Base, by Manufacturer, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 6. Percent Mix of Simulator Installed Base, by Manufacturer, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 7. Trend in Simulator Installed Base Share, by Manufacturer, by Census Survey Year, 2007 to 2020
  • 8. Percent of Sites Having at Least One Simulator Manufacturer Installed, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 9. Simulator Installed Base, by Year of Installation, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 10. Mix of Installed CT, X-ray, PET/CT, and MR Simulators, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 11. Mix of Installed CT, X-ray, PET/CT, and MR Simulators, by Census Survey Year, 2007 to 2020
  • 12. Mix of CT, X-ray, PET/CT, and MR Simulators, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 13. Mix of CT, X-ray, PET/CT, and MR Simulators Installed, by Manufacturer, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 14. Percent Mix of CT Simulator Installed Base, by Manufacturer, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 15. Percent Mix of PET/CT Simulator Installed Base, by Manufacturer, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 16. Percent Mix of X-ray Simulator Installed Base, by Manufacturer, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 17. CT Simulator Installed Base Market Share, by Installation Time Frames, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 18. Number of Slices for CT Simulators, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 19. Number of Slices for PET/CT Simulators, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 20. Whether the CT, PET/CT, and MR Simulators have a Wide Bore, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 21. Whether the CT Simulators have a Wide Bore, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 22. Whether the PET/CT Simulators have a Wide Bore, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 23. Percent Distribution of Simulators, by Department Location, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 24. Percent Distribution of Simulators, by Simulator Type, by Department Location, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 25. Percent of Simulators with Virtual Simulation Software Capability, by Census Survey Year, 2003 to 2020
  • 26. Percent Mix of Virtual Simulation Software Vendors, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 27. Whether Simulators have Virtual Simulation Software, by Simulator Hardware Vendor, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 28. Radiation Therapy Site Plans for Purchasing Simulators Over the Next Three Years, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 29. Proportion of Radiation Therapy Sites Planning to Purchase Simulators Over the Next Three
  • 30. Whether the Planned Simulator Acquisition will be New or Refurbished, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 31. Whether the Planned Simulator Acquisition will be New or Refurbished, by IMV Census Survey
  • 32. Mix of Planned Acquisitions of CT, X-ray, PET/CT, or MR Simulators, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 33. Number of Slices for Planned CT or PET/CT Simulators, by Simulator Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 34. Number of Slices for Planned CT or PET/CT Simulators, by Simulator Type (excluding unspecified responses), as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 35. Whether the Planned CT, PET/CT, or MR Simulator Will Have a Wide Bore, by Simulator Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 36. Whether the Planned CT, PET/CT, or MR Simulator Will Have a Wide Bore, by Simulator Type (excluding unspecified responses), as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 37. Planned Purchases of Virtual Simulation Software, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 38. Percent of Sites Mentioning Manufacturers Being Considered for Simulator Acquisitions, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 39. Trend in Percent of Sites Mentioning Manufacturers Being Considered for Simulator Acquisitions, by Census Survey Year, 2007 to 2020
  • 40. Brand Loyalty: Simulator Vendor Being Considered, by Current Simulator Installed Base, as of 2020 Census Survey

G. Record & Verify / Oncology Information Systems

Installed Record & Verify / Oncology Information Systems

  • 1. Site Type Mix of Radiation Therapy Sites with Record & Verify/Oncology Information Systems, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 2. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites with Record & Verify/Oncology Information Systems, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 3. Record & Verify/Oncology Information System Installed Base and Percent of Sites
  • 4. Percent Mix of Record & Verify vs. Oncology Information Systems, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 5. Whether Oncology Information Systems are Interfaced with Another IMS or HIS at This or Any Other Site, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 6. Whether Oncology Information Systems are Interfaced with Another IMS or HIS at This or Any Other Site, by Census Survey Year, 2010 to 2020
  • 7. Type of Data Available on Oncology Information Systems, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 8. Type of Data Available on Oncology Information Systems, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 9. Installed Base Market Share of Record & Verify/Oncology Information Systems, by Manufacturer, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 10. Trend in Record & Verify/Oncology Information Systems Installed Base Share, by Manufacturer, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 11. Installed Base Market Share of Oncology Information Systems with Record & Verify, by
  • 12. Installed Base Market Share of Record & Verify-Only Systems, by Manufacturer, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 13. Record & Verify/Oncology Information System Installed Base, by Year of Installation, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 14. Status of Image Management Systems in Radiation Therapy Sites, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 15. Trend in Percentage of Radiation Therapy Sites Having Image Management Systems, as of 2020 Census Survey

Planned Record & Verify / Oncology Information Systems

  • 16. Radiation Therapy Site Plans for Purchasing or Upgrading Record & Verify/Oncology
  • 17. Proportion of Radiation Therapy Sites Planning to Purchase or Upgrade Record & Verify/Oncology Information Systems, by Census Survey Year, 2011 to 2020
  • 18. Plans for New vs. Upgrade Purchases of Record & Verify/Oncology Information Systems Over the Next Three Years, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 19. Plans for New vs. Upgrade Purchases of Record & Verify/Oncology Information Systems Over the Next Three Years, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 20. Mix of Planned Acquisitions of New Record & Verify vs. Oncology Information Systems, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 21. Type of Data Being Planned for Availability on Oncology Information Systems, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 22. Percent Distribution of Sites Mentioning Manufacturers Being Considered for New Record & Verify/Oncology Information System Acquisitions, as of 2020 Census Survey

H. Capital Equipment Budgets

  • 1. Distribution of 2020 Radiation Therapy Capital Equipment Budgets, All Sites
  • 2. Distribution of 2020 Radiation Therapy Capital Equipment Budgets, by Site Type
  • 3. Radiation Therapy Capital Equipment Budget Trend, 2010-2020
  • 4. Radiation Therapy Capital Equipment Budget Trend, from 2020 to 2022, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 5. Trend in Reported 2020 Radiation Therapy Capital Equipment Budget, by Census Survey Year, 2018 to 2020
  • 6. Average Radiation Therapy Capital Equipment Budget per Site, for Sites with Budgets >$0, by Site Type, 2015-2020

I. Demographics & Site Operations Characteristics

Demographic Characteristics of Radiation Therapy Sites

  • 1. 2020 Radiation Therapy Census Sites, by Non-Hospital Type
  • 2. Site Type of 2020 Radiation Therapy Census Non-Hospital Sites
  • 3. 2020 Radiation Therapy Census Sites, by Hospital Bed Size
  • 4. Hospital Type, as a Percentage of Hospital Sites in 2020 Radiation Therapy Census, by Bed Size
  • 5. Whether Other Departments Perform Radiation Therapy at Facility, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 6. Other Departments Performing Radiation Treatments in Addition to Responding Department, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 7. Whether Department/Facility Has Remained Fully Operational, Has Remained Open but at Reduced Capacity, or Closed Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 8. Whether Facility Belongs to a Larger Provider Network of Radiation Therapy Sites, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 9. Whether Physicians Belong to a Physician-Owned Network Serving More Than One Radiation Therapy Site, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 10. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites with Staff Types, All Sites, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 11. Average Number of FTE Staff per Site Having That Type, All Sites, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 12. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites with Staff Types, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 13. Average Number of FTE Staff per Site Having That Type, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 14. 2019 Utilization Statistics, as of 2020 Census Survey
    • a) Productivity per External Beam Treatment Unit
    • b) Average FTEs per Site, by Staff Category
    • c) Average Total Treatment Visits per Staff Type
    • d) Average New Radiation Therapy Patients per Staff Type
    • e) Average Total External Beam Radiation Therapy Patients per Staff Type
  • 15. Whether Site Works with Medical Oncology Departments at Other Locations, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 16. Percent of Sites Providing Medical Oncology Services at Their Current Location, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 17. Whether Site Works with Surgical Oncology Departments at Other Locations, as of 2020 Census Survey
  • 18. Percent of Sites Providing Surgical Oncology Services at Their Current Location, by Site Type, as of 2020 Census Survey
株式会社グローバルインフォメーション
© Copyright 1996-2021, Global Information, Inc. All rights reserved.