サンプル依頼リスト カート
  • English
  • Korean
  • Traditional Chinese
  • Simplified Chinese
デフォルト表紙
市場調査レポート
商品コード
1594860

リモートブラウザ分離の世界市場：2024年～2031年

Global Remote Browser Isolation Market - 2024-2031

出版日
ページ情報
英文 213 Pages
納期
即日から翌営業日
カスタマイズ可能
適宜更新あり
価格
価格表記: USDを日本円(税抜)に換算
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=146.99円
リモートブラウザ分離の世界市場：2024年～2031年
出版日: 2024年11月21日
発行: DataM Intelligence
ページ情報: 英文 213 Pages
納期: 即日から翌営業日
GIIご利用のメリット
  • 全表示
  • 概要
  • 目次
概要

概要

リモートブラウザ分離の世界市場は、2023年に5億4,424万米ドルに達し、2031年には49億2,736万米ドルに達すると予測され、予測期間2024-2031年のCAGRは31.71%で成長する見込みです。

リモートブラウザ分離は、しばしばウェブ隔離として知られ、インターネットへの直接アクセスから隔離することでユーザーのデバイスを保護するセキュリティ戦略です。隔離は、すべてのブラウジング操作をクラウドベースのリモート・コンテナ内で行うことで実現されます。インターネット閲覧のサンドボックス化により、リモートブラウザ分離は不正なウェブサイトコードがもたらす多くの脆弱性からデータ、デバイス、ネットワークを保護します。

リモートブラウザ分離ソリューションは、モバイルデバイスでの安全なウェブブラウジングの必要性を認識し、モバイルを中心とした機能性を生み出しています。これらのテクノロジーは、スマートフォンやタブレットで中断のない安全なウェブ閲覧を保証するために設計されています。モバイル中心のリモートブラウザ分離ソリューションは、シームレスなパフォーマンスとユーザーフレンドリーなインターフェイスを保証するために、スクリーンサイズ、触覚インタラクション、リソース効率などの要素を考慮しています。

さらに、リモートブラウザ分離の機能を広く使用されているモバイルブラウザに直接組み込むために、ブラウザの拡張機能やプラグインが開発されています。この拡張機能は、消費者が利便性を犠牲にすることなく、モバイルデバイスで安全なブラウジングを実現するための実用的な方法を提供します。

ダイナミクス

高まるサイバーセキュリティへの懸念

サイバーセキュリティの脅威とは、企業の業務、機能、ブランド、評判、公共イメージに有害な影響を及ぼす可能性のあるあらゆる事件や状況を指します。サイバーセキュリティの脅威が増加している背景には、攻撃対象の拡大や悪意のあるエンティティの戦略の進化があります。仮想ブラウザ技術を活用したリモートブラウザ分離は、オンラインブラウザから発生する脅威を軽減するための追加セキュリティレイヤーを提供します。

例えば、2023年1月、イスラエルのソフトウェア企業であるチェック・ポイント・ソフトウェア・テクノロジーズ社は、サイバー攻撃の検知にリモートブラウザ分離を使用することで、近年の世界のサイバー攻撃が38%増加したと報告しています。また、2022年には、米国はサイバー攻撃全体で57％増、英国は77％増、シンガポールは26％増となった。その結果、サイバーセキュリティへの関心の高まりがリモートブラウザ分離市場の拡大を後押ししています。

生産性と保護を強化するセキュアブラウザ拡張機能の台頭

従来のブラウザ隔離技術からセキュアなブラウザ拡張機能への移行は、現代のビジネスシーンにおいてセキュリティと生産性を両立させる必要性によって動機づけられています。以前は分離は強力なセキュリティを提供していましたが、CPU使用率への影響がパフォーマンスを妨げることが多く、生産性を重視する企業では採用が見送られていました。ブラウザやSaaSサービスが日常的な機能に不可欠な現代の職場では、従来の分離手法のパフォーマンス上の欠点がかなり顕著になり、セキュリティの決定に影響を与えるかもしれません。

さらに、フィッシングやマルウェア、ランサムウェアといったウェブベースの脅威の特徴や流行は、時代遅れの隔離手法の有効性を超えて進化しており、その結果、新たなセキュリティの脆弱性が生じています。セキュアブラウザ拡張機能は、ブラウザに直接組み込むことで、これらの欠陥を軽減し、リアルタイムの可視化、リスク評価、機械学習による自動化された攻撃対応を提供します。この発明は、生産性を妨げることなく、中断のないプロアクティブな保護を提供し、ブラウザ・セキュリティ・ソリューションの重要な改善点となります。

パフォーマンスと待ち時間の問題

リモートブラウザ分離ソリューションは、オンラインブラウジングタスクをリモートサーバーに委ねることが多く、ページのロード時間や全体的な待ち時間の増加を招く可能性があります。この影響は、ビデオ会議ツールやクラウドベースのソフトウェアなど、リソース集約的でリアルタイムなプログラムに依存している顧客にとって特に顕著です。

さらに、リモートワークモデルやクラウドベースのアプリケーションを採用する企業が増えるにつれ、高速で低遅延のブラウジング体験に対する要求も高まっています。リモートブラウザ分離に関連するパフォーマンスの低下は、顧客満足度と業務効率を優先する企業にとって、これらのソリューションの導入を思いとどまらせる可能性があります。このように、セキュリティの向上とパフォーマンスのバランスは、リモートブラウザ分離の広範な導入、特に迅速性と効率性が重要な状況において、大きな障害となります。

目次

第1章 調査手法と調査範囲

第2章 定義と概要

第3章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第4章 市場力学

  • 影響要因
    • 促進要因
      • サイバーセキュリティの懸念の高まり
      • 生産性と保護を強化する安全なブラウザ拡張機能の台頭
    • 抑制要因
      • パフォーマンスとレイテンシの問題
    • 機会
    • 影響分析

第5章 産業分析

  • ポーターのファイブフォース分析
  • サプライチェーン分析
  • 価格分析
  • 規制分析
  • ロシア・ウクライナ戦争の影響分析
  • DMIの見解

第6章 COVID-19分析

第7章 タイプ別

  • DOM再構築ベース
  • ピクセルプッシュベース
  • ネットワークベクターレンダリング
  • その他

第8章 組織規模別

  • 中小企業
  • 大企業

第9章 エンドユーザー別

  • 銀行、金融サービス、保険（BFSI）
  • ITおよび通信
  • ヘルスケア
  • 政府と防衛
  • 小売業とeコマース
  • 教育
  • その他

第10章 地域別

  • 北米
    • 米国
    • カナダ
    • メキシコ
  • 欧州
    • ドイツ
    • 英国
    • フランス
    • イタリア
    • スペイン
    • その他欧州地域
  • 南米
    • ブラジル
    • アルゼンチン
    • その他南米
  • アジア太平洋地域
    • 中国
    • インド
    • 日本
    • オーストラリア
    • その他アジア太平洋地域
  • 中東・アフリカ

第11章 競合情勢

  • 競合シナリオ
  • 市況・シェア分析
  • M&A分析

第12章 企業プロファイル

  • Broadcom
    • 会社概要
    • 製品ポートフォリオと概要
    • 財務概要
    • 主な発展
  • Cisco
  • Cloudflare
  • ConnX
  • Ericom
  • Forcepoint
  • McAfee
  • Proofpoint
  • Versa Networks
  • Zscaler

第13章 付録

目次
Product Code: ICT8769

Overview

Global Remote Browser Isolation Market reached US$ 544.24 million in 2023 and is expected to reach US$ 4,927.36 million by 2031, growing with a CAGR of 31.71% during the forecast period 2024-2031.

Remote browser isolation, often known as web isolation, is a security strategy that protects users' devices by isolating them from direct internet access. The isolation is accomplished by conducting all browsing actions within a remote, cloud-based container. By implementing sandboxing for internet browsing, remote browser isolation safeguards data, devices and networks against numerous vulnerabilities posed by rogue website code.

Remote browser isolation solutions are acknowledging the necessity for secure web browsing on mobile devices, resulting in the creation of mobile-centric functionalities. These technologies are designed to ensure uninterrupted and secure web browsing on smartphones and tablets. Mobile-centric Remote Browser Isolation solutions take into account elements like screen dimensions, tactile interactions and resource efficiency to guarantee seamless performance and user-friendly interfaces.

Furthermore, browser extensions and plugins are being developed to include remote browser isolation functionalities directly into widely-used mobile browsers, thereby obviating the necessity for standalone programs. The extensions provide a practical method for consumers to achieve secure browsing on their mobile devices without sacrificing convenience.

Dynamics

The Rising Cybersecurity Concerns

A cybersecurity threat refers to any incident or situation that could lead to detrimental effects on a business's operations, functions, brand, reputation or public image. The rise in cybersecurity threats is fueled by the broadening of attack surfaces and the advancing strategies of malevolent entities. Remote browser isolation, utilizing virtual browser technology, provides an additional security layer to reduce threats originating from online browsers.

For instance, in January 2023, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., an Israel-based software firm, reported a 38% rise in global cyberattacks in recent years by using Remote browser isolation in detection of cyberattacks. Also, in 2022, US experienced a 57% rise in overall cyberattacks, UK a 77% increase and Singapore a 26% increase. Consequently, the escalating cybersecurity concerns are propelling the expansion of the remote browser isolation market.

The Rise Of Secure Browser Extensions For Enhanced Productivity And Protection

The transition from conventional browser isolation techniques to secure browser extensions is motivated by the necessity to reconcile security with productivity in the contemporary business landscape. Although isolation formerly provided strong security, its effect on CPU utilization frequently hindered performance, discouraging adoption by productivity-oriented enterprises. In contemporary workplaces, where browsers and SaaS services are integral to daily functions, the performance drawbacks of conventional isolation methods might be considerably pronounced, impacting security decisions.

Furthermore, the characteristics and prevalence of web-based threats-such as phishing, malware and ransomware-have advanced beyond the efficacy of outdated isolation methods, resulting in new security vulnerabilities. Secure browser extensions mitigate these deficiencies by embedding directly within browsers, offering real-time visibility, risk assessment and automated attack responses via machine learning. This invention provides uninterrupted, proactive protection without hindering productivity, rendering it a vital improvement in browser security solutions.

Performance And Latency Issues

Remote Browser Isolation solutions often entail delegating online browsing tasks to a remote server, potentially resulting in increased page loading times and overall latency. The effect is especially evident for customers dependent on resource-intensive, real-time programs, such as video conferencing tools or cloud-based software, where speed and responsiveness are essential for uninterrupted functionality.

Furthermore, as enterprises increasingly embrace remote work models and cloud-based apps, the demand for high-speed, low-latency browsing experiences escalates. The performance decline linked to Remote Browser Isolation may dissuade firms from implementing these solutions, as they prioritize customer delight and operational efficiency. Thus, the balance between improved security and performance presents a considerable obstacle to the widespread implementation of remote browser isolation, especially in contexts where rapidity and efficiency are critical.

Segment Analysis

The global remote browser isolation market is segmented based on type organization size, end-user and region.

DOM Reconstruction-Based Type Offers Several Advantages For Enhancing Security And Performance

DOM reconstruction-based remote browser isolation has numerous benefits for improving security and performance in the information technology and telecommunications industries. DOM reconstruction mitigates the danger of hazardous material and web-based assaults by eliminating potentially malicious code and known exploits, so offering an additional layer of protection that conventional security measures may fail to identify.

The technology enhances the surfing experience by reducing latency in specific pixel-rendering systems and sending web content directly to the user's local browser, hence improving performance and user satisfaction. Moreover, DOM reconstruction is a more economical approach than certain pixel-pushing techniques, as it obviates the necessity for substantial server-side rendering and diminishes the transfer of online content. It reduces operational expenses related to remote browser isolation while ensuring strong defense against online threats.

Geographical Penetration

North America's Increasing Need For Advanced Cybersecurity Solutions.

The robust regulatory framework in North America, encompassing data protection statutes such as the CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act) and several industry-specific rules, has expedited the implementation of remote browser isolation to adhere to data security and privacy mandates. US has been a leader in implementing remote browser isolation technology to safeguard against the increasing menace of cyberattacks, including ransomware, malware and phishing.

The substantial number of online transactions and sensitive data transmitted in sectors such as finance, healthcare and telecommunications requires the implementation of stringent web security protocols. The remote browser isolation effectively mitigates web-based risks by isolating them, thereby safeguarding endpoint devices and business networks from potential harm.

Prominent cybersecurity firms and IT service providers in the region are progressively incorporating remote browser isolation into their services, enabling businesses to protect their online browsing activity without sacrificing user experience or system efficiency. The interplay of regulatory compliance, heightened demand for data protection and technical innovation establishes North America as a major market for remote browser isolation solutions.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the market include Broadcom, Cisco, Cloudflare, ConnX, Ericom, Forcepoint, McAfee, Proofpoint, Versa Networks and Zscaler.

Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis

The war between Russia and Ukraine has profoundly affected remote browser isolation (RBI) solutions, especially in Russia, where heightened digital sovereignty initiatives and international sanctions have compromised Internet infrastructure and online security. The escalation of the conflict has prompted Russia to seek isolation of its Internet ecosystem, resulting in the exit of several international technology firms, including security and cloud service providers.

This has led to a reduced availability of dependable security technologies in Russia, especially sophisticated RBI solutions that depend on international providers for secure web browsing protection. The withdrawal of these foreign services has compelled Russian entities to rely on less dependable domestic alternatives that may not provide equivalent security against cyber threats, especially those aimed at browsers.

The sanctions and domestic censorship in Russia have exacerbated the nation's cybersecurity environment. The increasing fragmentation of the global Internet environment, coupled with the diminished presence of international network operators and service providers, has impeded the efficacy of RBI solutions. These technologies depend significantly on uninterrupted connectivity and worldwide infrastructure to detect threats in real-time.

Type

  • DOM Reconstruction-Based
  • Pixel Pushing-Based
  • Network Vector Rendering
  • Others

Organization Size

  • Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
  • Large Enterprises

End-User

  • Banking, Financial Services and Insurance (BFSI)
  • IT and Telecom
  • Healthcare
  • Government and Defense
  • Retail and E-Commerce
  • Education
  • Others

By Region

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • France
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa

Why Purchase the Report?

  • To visualize the global remote browser isolation market segmentation based on type organization size, end-user and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
  • Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
  • Excel data sheet with numerous data points of the remote browser isolation market level with all segments.
  • PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
  • Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global remote browser isolation market report would provide approximately 62 tables, 56 figures and 213 pages

Target Audience 2024

  • Manufacturers/ Buyers
  • Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
  • Research Professionals
  • Emerging Companies

Table of Contents

1. Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1. Research Methodology
  • 1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Snippet by Type
  • 3.2. Snippet by Organization Size
  • 3.3. Snippet by End-User
  • 3.4. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

  • 4.1. Impacting Factors
    • 4.1.1. Drivers
      • 4.1.1.1. The Rising Cybersecurity Concerns
      • 4.1.1.2. The Rise Of Secure Browser Extensions For Enhanced Productivity And Protection
    • 4.1.2. Restraints
      • 4.1.2.1. Performance And Latency Issues
    • 4.1.3. Opportunity
    • 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

  • 5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
  • 5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.3. Pricing Analysis
  • 5.4. Regulatory Analysis
  • 5.5. Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis
  • 5.6. DMI Opinion

6. COVID-19 Analysis

  • 6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
    • 6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID-19
    • 6.1.2. Scenario During COVID-19
    • 6.1.3. Scenario Post COVID-19
  • 6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
  • 6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
  • 6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
  • 6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
  • 6.6. Conclusion

7. By Type

  • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Type
  • 7.2. DOM Reconstruction-Based*
    • 7.2.1. Introduction
    • 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 7.3. Pixel Pushing-Based
  • 7.4. Network Vector Rendering
  • 7.5. Others

8. By Organization Size

  • 8.1. Introduction
    • 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Organization Size
  • 8.2. Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)*
    • 8.2.1. Introduction
    • 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 8.3. Large Enterprises

9. By End-User

  • 9.1. Introduction
    • 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By End-User
  • 9.2. Banking, Financial Services and Insurance (BFSI)*
    • 9.2.1. Introduction
    • 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 9.3. IT and Telecom
  • 9.4. Healthcare
  • 9.5. Government and Defense
  • 9.6. Retail and E-Commerce
  • 9.7. Education
  • 9.8. Others

10. By Region

  • 10.1. Introduction
    • 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
    • 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
  • 10.2. North America
    • 10.2.1. Introduction
    • 10.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 10.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 10.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 10.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.2.6.1. US
      • 10.2.6.2. Canada
      • 10.2.6.3. Mexico
  • 10.3. Europe
    • 10.3.1. Introduction
    • 10.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 10.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 10.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 10.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.3.6.1. Germany
      • 10.3.6.2. UK
      • 10.3.6.3. France
      • 10.3.6.4. Italy
      • 10.3.6.5. Spain
      • 10.3.6.6. Rest of Europe
  • 10.4. South America
    • 10.4.1. Introduction
    • 10.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 10.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 10.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 10.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.4.6.1. Brazil
      • 10.4.6.2. Argentina
      • 10.4.6.3. Rest of South America
  • 10.5. Asia-Pacific
    • 10.5.1. Introduction
    • 10.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 10.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 10.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 10.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.5.6.1. China
      • 10.5.6.2. India
      • 10.5.6.3. Japan
      • 10.5.6.4. Australia
      • 10.5.6.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 10.6. Middle East and Africa
    • 10.6.1. Introduction
    • 10.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 10.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 10.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User

11. Competitive Landscape

  • 11.1. Competitive Scenario
  • 11.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
  • 11.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

12. Company Profiles

  • 12.1. Broadcom*
    • 12.1.1. Company Overview
    • 12.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
    • 12.1.3. Financial Overview
    • 12.1.4. Key Developments
  • 12.2. Cisco
  • 12.3. Cloudflare
  • 12.4. ConnX
  • 12.5. Ericom
  • 12.6. Forcepoint
  • 12.7. McAfee
  • 12.8. Proofpoint
  • 12.9. Versa Networks
  • 12.10. Zscaler

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

13. Appendix

  • 13.1. About Us and Services
  • 13.2. Contact Us