サンプル依頼リスト カート
  • English
  • Korean
  • Traditional Chinese
  • Simplified Chinese
デフォルト表紙
市場調査レポート
商品コード
1448008

土壌安定化市場-2023年～2030年

Soil Stabilization Market - 2023-2030

出版日
ページ情報
英文 247 Pages
納期
即日から翌営業日
カスタマイズ可能
適宜更新あり
価格
価格表記: USDを日本円(税抜)に換算
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=146.82円
土壌安定化市場-2023年～2030年
出版日: 2024年03月08日
発行: DataM Intelligence
ページ情報: 英文 247 Pages
納期: 即日から翌営業日
GIIご利用のメリット
  • 全表示
  • 概要
  • 目次
概要

概要

世界の土壌安定化市場は、2022年に208億9,000万米ドルに達し、2023～2030年の予測期間中にCAGR 5.2％で成長し、2030年には313億米ドルに達すると予測されています。

持続可能性と環境に優しい建設手法への注目の高まりが、土壌安定化技術の採用を促進しています。これらの工法は、環境への影響を最小限に抑え、土壌浸食を減らし、効率的な土地利用を促進するのに役立ち、より持続可能なインフラ開発を達成するための世界の取り組みと一致しています。

先進経済諸国と新興経済諸国の両方において、道路、高速道路、空港、港湾などのインフラプロジェクトへの投資が、土壌安定化ソリューションの需要を促進しています。これらのプロジェクトでは、強固で安定した基礎が必要とされることが多く、土壌安定化は不可欠な要素となっています。米国農務省（USDA）によると、米国では全建設プロジェクトの90％以上が土壌安定化に関わっており、米国地質調査所（USGS）は、土壌安定化技術によって建設コストを最大20％削減できると予測しています。

継続的な研究開発努力により、先進的な土壌安定化材料や添加剤の開発が進められています。ジオシンセティックス、バイオポリマー、その他の特殊な添加剤における革新は、安定化技術の効果を高め、その用途を拡大しています。Mohadeseh Cheraghalikhani、Hamed Niroumand、Lech Balachowskiの調査によると、土壌安定剤としてマイクロ・ナノサイズのベントナイトが粘土質の砂の強度を向上させるために使用されています。

市場力学

土壌安定化の利点に関する意識の高まり

土壌安定化技術は土壌浸食を防ぐのに役立ち、生態系、農地、建設現場の健全性を維持するのに不可欠です。Global Agricultureによると、毎年240億トンの肥沃な土壌が浸食によって失われていると予想されています。FAOは、農業における土壌浸食は農業生産を50％減少させると主張しています。土壌の安定化は、土壌の物理的、化学的、生物学的特性を向上させ、保水性、養分の利用可能性、土壌全体の健康状態を改善します。これはさらに、植物の生育を改善し、作物の収量を増やすことにつながります。

土壌安定化技術は土壌浸食を防ぐのに役立ち、土壌が風や水に流されにくくなります。これは、農地の完全性を維持し、表土の損失を防ぎ、持続可能な土地利用を確保する上で極めて重要です。安定化された土壌は、干ばつや大雨などの悪天候にも強くなります。この適応性は、農家が気候変動による農作物や農業生産への影響を軽減するのに役立ちます。

インフラ整備

道路、高速道路、橋、空港、港湾、鉄道などのインフラ・プロジェクトでは、長期的な耐久性と機能性を確保するため、安定した強固な基礎が必要です。土壌安定化技術は、建設現場を整え、こうしたプロジェクトで発生しうる土壌関連の課題に対処する上で、極めて重要な役割を果たしています。米国農務省（USDA）によると、米国の全建設プロジェクトの90％以上が土壌安定化を伴うものであり、米国地質調査所（USGS）は、土壌安定化技術により、プロジェクトの種類やその他の要因にもよるが、建設コストを最大20％削減できると予測しています。

インフラプロジェクトでは、重く複雑な構造物を建設することが多いです。適切な土壌安定化により、基礎がこれらの構造物の重量と耐荷重要件を確実に支えることができ、沈下、不同沈下、構造物の破損を防ぐことができます。

土壌安定化添加剤と技術の高いコスト

土壌安定化技術の実施には、設備、資材、熟練労働者に関する費用を含む、多額の初期費用がかかることがあります。例えば、International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology（IRJET）によると、安定化させる土壌の体積が10 m3の場合、セメント安定化の平均コストは10,912ルピーです。このようなコストは、特に予算の制約が懸念される場合、建設プロジェクトや土地開発の取り組みが土壌安定化法を採用することを躊躇させる可能性があります。

農民は、土壌安定化の利点や潜在的な投資効果を十分に理解していない可能性があります。特に長期的な利点がわからない場合、初期費用が高額になるため、こうした手法の検討や採用が敬遠される可能性があります。

目次

目次

第1章 調査手法と調査範囲

第2章 定義と概要

第3章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第4章 市場力学

  • 影響要因
    • 促進要因
      • 土壌安定化の利点に関する意識の高まり
      • インフラ整備
    • 抑制要因
      • 土壌安定化添加剤と技術の高コスト
    • 機会
    • 影響分析

第5章 産業分析

  • ポーターのファイブフォース分析
  • サプライチェーン分析
  • 価格分析
  • 規制分析

第6章 COVID-19分析

第7章 方法別

  • 機械的方法
  • 化学的方法

第8章 添加剤別

  • ポリマー
    • 合成ポリマー
    • バイオポリマー
  • 鉱物・安定剤
    • ポルトランドセメント
    • 石灰
    • フライアッシュ
    • その他
  • その他の添加物
    • 農業廃棄物
    • 汚泥
    • キレート塩

第9章 流通チャネル別

  • 直営店
  • 専門店
  • eコマース
  • その他

第10章 用途別

  • 産業用
    • 道路
    • 埋立地/汚染地
    • その他
  • 農業
    • 露地栽培
    • 温室
    • 非農業
    • ゴルフ場／スポーツグラウンド
    • 住宅
    • その他

第11章 地域別

  • 北米
    • 米国
    • カナダ
    • メキシコ
  • 欧州
    • ドイツ
    • 英国
    • フランス
    • イタリア
    • ロシア
    • その他欧州
  • 南米
    • ブラジル
    • アルゼンチン
    • その他南米
  • アジア太平洋
    • 中国
    • インド
    • 日本
    • オーストラリア
    • その他アジア太平洋地域
  • 中東・アフリカ

第12章 競合情勢

  • 競合シナリオ
  • 市況/シェア分析
  • M&A分析

第13章 企業プロファイル

  • Caterpillar
    • 会社概要
    • 製品ポートフォリオと説明
    • 財務概要
    • 最近の動向
  • AB Volvo
  • FAYAT GROUP
  • WIRTGEN GROUP
  • CARMEUSE
  • Global Road Technology International Holdings（HK）Limited
  • SNF
  • Aggrebind, Inc.
  • Iridan
  • Tensar LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

第14章 付録

目次
Product Code: AG8032

Overview

Global Soil Stabilization Market reached US$ 20.89 billion in 2022 and is expected to reach US$ 31.3 billion by 2030, growing with a CAGR of 5.2% during the forecast period 2023-2030.

Increasing focus on sustainability and environmentally friendly construction practices is driving the adoption of soil stabilization techniques. These methods help minimize environmental impact, reduce soil erosion, and promote efficient land use, aligning with global efforts to achieve more sustainable infrastructure development.

Investments in infrastructure projects, such as roads, highways, airports, and ports, in both developed and developing economies drive the demand for soil stabilization solutions. These projects often require strong and stable foundations, making soil stabilization an essential component. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), over 90% of all construction projects in the United States involve soil stabilization, and USGS (US Geological Survey) projected that soil stabilization techniques could lessen construction costs by up to 20%.

Ongoing research and development efforts are leading to the development of advanced soil stabilization materials and additives. Innovations in geosynthetics, biopolymers, and other specialized additives are enhancing the effectiveness of stabilization techniques and expanding their applications. As per the research done by Mohadeseh Cheraghalikhani, Hamed Niroumand & Lech Balachowski, micro- and nano-size bentonite as soil stabilizers are used to improve the strength of clayey sand.

Dynamics

Increasing Awareness About the Benefits of Soil Stabilization

Soil stabilization techniques help prevent soil erosion, which is essential for preserving the good health of ecosystems, agricultural fields, and construction sites. According to Global Agriculture, every year an expected 24 billion tons of fertile soil are lost due to erosion. FAO claims that soil erosion in agriculture reduces agricultural production by 50%. Soil stabilization can enhance the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the soil, resulting in better water retention, nutrient availability, and overall soil health. This further leads to improved plant growth and increased crop yields.

Soil stabilization techniques help prevent soil erosion making the soil less susceptible to being carried away by wind or water. This is crucial in maintaining the integrity of agricultural fields, preventing loss of topsoil, and ensuring sustainable land use. Stabilized soils are more r resistant to adverse weather conditions like drought or heavy rain. This adaptability can assist farmers in reducing the impact of climate change on their crops and agricultural output.

Infrastructure Development

Infrastructure projects, such as roads, highways, bridges, airports, ports, and railways, require stable and strong foundations to ensure their long-term durability and functionality. Soil stabilization techniques play a crucial role in preparing construction sites and addressing soil-related challenges that can arise during these projects. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), over 90% of all construction projects in the United States involve soil stabilization, and USGS (US Geological Survey) projected that soil stabilization techniques could lessen construction costs by up to 20%, depending on the type of project and other factors.

Infrastructure projects often involve the construction of heavy and complex structures. Proper soil stabilization ensures that the foundation can support the weight and load-bearing requirements of these structures, preventing settlement, uneven subsidence, and structural failure.

High Cost of Soil Stabilization Additives and Techniques

The implementation of soil stabilization techniques can involve significant upfront costs, including expenses related to equipment, materials, and skilled labor. For instance, according to the International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), for 10 m3 volume of soil to be stabilized, average cost of cement stabilization is Rs 10,912. These costs can deter some construction projects or land development initiatives from adopting soil stabilization methods, especially in cases where budget constraints are a concern.

Farmers might not fully understand the benefits of soil stabilization or the potential return on investment. High upfront costs can discourage them from exploring or adopting these practices, especially if they are unaware of the long-term advantages.

Segment Analysis

The global soil stabilization market is segmented based on method, additives, distribution channel, application and region.

Efficient Result Achieved by Mechanical Method

The mechanical method involves physically altering the soil's structure and properties to achieve stabilization. In February 2023, Bobcat introduced a new light compaction product range. These Light compactors increase soil strength and improve stability and load-bearing capacity by removing voids and interlocking soil particles. Mechanical methods often provide relatively rapid results in terms of soil loosening and compaction reduction. Farmers and land managers can see immediate improvements in soil structure and tilth after using mechanical equipment.

Some mechanical methods, such as reduced tillage or no-till practices, are also associated with improved soil conservation and reduced erosion. These practices align with sustainable farming principles and may receive support from agricultural policies and programs.

Source: DataM Intelligence Analysis (2023)

Geographical Penetration

Asia-Pacific's Growing Soil Erosion

Many areas in Asia-Pacific are experiencing significant soil erosion problems which leads to crop loss in that region. For instance, the annual loss in output of main crops in India because of soil erosion has been estimated to be 7.2 million tonnes which is about 4 to 6.3 percent of the annual agricultural production of the country. Soil stabilization is crucial for preventing erosion and maintaining soil health enhancing crop productivity in that region.

In June 2022, InnoCSR, a South Korean material technology company and member of the Born2Global Centre, introduced Good Road System (GRS), its soil-stabilized road technology, in Nepal. The technology follows the success of the Good Bricks System, where InnoCSR's soil stabilizers are used to make non-fired bricks. This type of development in the Asia-Pacific region also leads to soil stabilization market growth in that region.

Source: DataM Intelligence Analysis (2023)

Competitive Landscape

The major global players include Caterpillar, AB Volvo, FAYAT GROUP, WIRTGEN GROUP, CARMEUSE, Global Road Technology International Holdings, SNF, Aggrebind, Inc., Iridan and Tensar

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

COVID Impact

The pandemic led to disruptions in global supply chains, affecting the availability of materials and equipment needed for soil stabilization projects. This might have resulted in delays or increased costs for agricultural operations.

Lockdowns, travel restrictions, and social distancing measures impacted labor availability and mobility. This could have affected the implementation of soil stabilization techniques that require manual labor or specialized expertise.

By Method

  • Mechanical Method
  • Chemical Method

By Additives

  • Polymer
    • Synthetic Polymers
    • Biopolymers
  • Mineral & Stabilizing Agents
    • Portland Cement
    • Lime
    • Fly Ash
    • Others
  • Other Additives
    • Agricultural waste
    • Sludge
    • Chelates & Salts

By Distribution Channel

  • Company-Owned Shops
  • Specialty Stores
  • E-Commerce
  • Others

By Application

  • Industrial
    • Roads
    • Landfills/Contaminated Land
    • Others
  • Agriculture
    • Open-Field Application
    • Greenhouse
  • Non-Agriculture
    • Golf Courses/Sports Grounds
    • Residential
    • Others

By Region

  • North America
    • U.S.
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • France
    • Italy
    • Russia
    • Rest of Europe
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa

Key Developments

  • In April 2022, Researchers at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Mandi developed sustainable techniques for soil stabilization using a harmless bacteria called S. Pasteurii.
  • In August 2020, Corteva introduced the Instinct NEXTGEN nitrogen stabilizer. The Optinyte technology in Instinct NXTGEN nitrogen stabilizer promotes 28% greater soil nitrogen retention.
  • In June 2021, Lafarge Western Canada Introduced EcoPlanet Ultra Low Carbon Cement. EcoPlanet is suitable for mining and soil stabilization.

Why Purchase the Report?

  • To visualize the global soil stabilization market segmentation based on method, additives, distribution channel, application and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
  • Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
  • Excel data sheet with numerous data points of soil stabilization market-level with all segments.
  • PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
  • Product mapping available as Excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global soil stabilization market report would provide approximately 69 tables, 67 figures and 247 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

  • Manufacturers/ Buyers
  • Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
  • Research Professionals
  • Emerging Companies

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

1.Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1.Research Methodology
  • 1.2.Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2.Definition and Overview

3.Executive Summary

  • 3.1.Snippet by Method
  • 3.2.Snippet by Additives
  • 3.3.Snippet by Distribution Channel
  • 3.4.Snippet by Application
  • 3.5.Snippet by Region

4.Dynamics

  • 4.1.Impacting Factors
    • 4.1.1.Drivers
      • 4.1.1.1.Increasing Awareness About the Benefits of Soil Stabilization
      • 4.1.1.2.Infrastructure Development
    • 4.1.2.Restraints
      • 4.1.2.1.High Cost of Soil Stabilization Additives and Techniques
    • 4.1.3.Opportunity
    • 4.1.4.Impact Analysis

5.Industry Analysis

  • 5.1.Porter's Five Force Analysis
  • 5.2.Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.3.Pricing Analysis
  • 5.4.Regulatory Analysis

6.COVID-19 Analysis

  • 6.1.Analysis of COVID-19
    • 6.1.1.Scenario Before COVID
    • 6.1.2.Scenario During COVID
    • 6.1.3.Scenario Post COVID
  • 6.2.Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
  • 6.3.Demand-Supply Spectrum
  • 6.4.Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
  • 6.5.Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
  • 6.6.Conclusion

7.By Method

  • 7.1.Introduction
    • 7.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
    • 7.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Method
  • 7.2.Mechanical Method*
    • 7.2.1.Introduction
    • 7.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 7.3.Chemical Method

8.By Additive

  • 8.1.Introduction
    • 8.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additive
    • 8.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Additive
  • 8.2.Polymer*
    • 8.2.1.Introduction
    • 8.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
    • 8.2.3.Synthetic Polymers
    • 8.2.4.Biopolymers
  • 8.3.Mineral & Stabilizing Agents
    • 8.3.1.Portland Cement
    • 8.3.2.Lime
    • 8.3.3.Fly Ash
    • 8.3.4.Others
  • 8.4.Other Additives
    • 8.4.1.Agricultural waste
    • 8.4.2.Sludge
    • 8.4.3.Chelates & Salts

9.By Distribution Channel

  • 9.1.Introduction
    • 9.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
    • 9.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Distribution Channel
  • 9.2.Company-Owned Shops*
    • 9.2.1.Introduction
    • 9.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 9.3.Specialty Stores
  • 9.4.E-Commerce
  • 9.5.Others

10.By Application

  • 10.1.Introduction
    • 10.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 10.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Application
  • 10.2.Industrial*
    • 10.2.1.Introduction
    • 10.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
    • 10.2.3.Roads
    • 10.2.4.Landfills/Contaminated Land
    • 10.2.5.Others
  • 10.3.Agriculture
    • 10.3.1.Open-Field Application
    • 10.3.2.Greenhouse
    • 10.3.3.Non-Agriculture
    • 10.3.4.Golf Courses/Sports Grounds
    • 10.3.5.Residential
    • 10.3.6.Others

11.By Region

  • 11.1.Introduction
    • 11.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
    • 11.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
  • 11.2.North America
    • 11.2.1.Introduction
    • 11.2.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.2.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
    • 11.2.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additives
    • 11.2.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
    • 11.2.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 11.2.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.2.7.1.U.S.
      • 11.2.7.2.Canada
      • 11.2.7.3.Mexico
  • 11.3.Europe
    • 11.3.1.Introduction
    • 11.3.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.3.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
    • 11.3.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additives
    • 11.3.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
    • 11.3.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 11.3.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.3.7.1.Germany
      • 11.3.7.2.UK
      • 11.3.7.3.France
      • 11.3.7.4.Italy
      • 11.3.7.5.Russia
      • 11.3.7.6.Rest of Europe
  • 11.4.South America
    • 11.4.1.Introduction
    • 11.4.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.4.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
    • 11.4.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additives
    • 11.4.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
    • 11.4.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 11.4.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.4.7.1.Brazil
      • 11.4.7.2.Argentina
      • 11.4.7.3.Rest of South America
  • 11.5.Asia-Pacific
    • 11.5.1.Introduction
    • 11.5.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.5.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
    • 11.5.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additives
    • 11.5.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
    • 11.5.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 11.5.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.5.7.1.China
      • 11.5.7.2.India
      • 11.5.7.3.Japan
      • 11.5.7.4.Australia
      • 11.5.7.5.Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 11.6.Middle East and Africa
    • 11.6.1.Introduction
    • 11.6.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.6.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
    • 11.6.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additives
    • 11.6.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
    • 11.6.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application

12.Competitive Landscape

  • 12.1.Competitive Scenario
  • 12.2.Market Positioning/Share Analysis
  • 12.3.Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

13.Company Profiles

  • 13.1.Caterpillar*
    • 13.1.1.Company Overview
    • 13.1.2.Product Portfolio and Description
    • 13.1.3.Financial Overview
    • 13.1.4.Recent Developments
  • 13.2.AB Volvo
  • 13.3.FAYAT GROUP
  • 13.4.WIRTGEN GROUP
  • 13.5.CARMEUSE
  • 13.6.Global Road Technology International Holdings (HK) Limited
  • 13.7.SNF
  • 13.8.Aggrebind, Inc.
  • 13.9.Iridan
  • 13.10.Tensar LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

14.Appendix

  • 14.1.About Us and Services
  • 14.2.Contact Us