サンプル依頼リスト カート
  • English
  • Korean
  • Traditional Chinese
  • Simplified Chinese
表紙：農薬総合的病害虫管理の世界市場-2023年～2030年
市場調査レポート
商品コード
1316294

農薬総合的病害虫管理の世界市場-2023年～2030年

Global Pesticides Integrated Pest Management Market - 2023-2030

出版日
ページ情報
英文 102 Pages
納期
即日から翌営業日
カスタマイズ可能
適宜更新あり
価格
価格表記: USDを日本円(税抜)に換算
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=146.96円
農薬総合的病害虫管理の世界市場-2023年～2030年
出版日: 2023年07月27日
発行: DataM Intelligence
ページ情報: 英文 102 Pages
納期: 即日から翌営業日
GIIご利用のメリット
  • 全表示
  • 概要
  • 目次
概要

市場概要

世界の農薬総合的病害虫管理市場は、2022年に178億米ドルに達し、2023年から2030年の予測期間にCAGR 5.1%で成長し、2030年には264億米ドルに達すると予測されています。

農薬総合的病害虫管理の分野における市場動向のひとつは、持続可能で環境に優しい害虫駆除ソリューションに対する需要の高まりです。消費者や農業業界は、従来の農薬が人間の健康や環境に及ぼす潜在的な悪影響を意識するようになっており、生態系のバランスを優先し、化学物質の投入を最小限に抑える総合的病害虫管理アプローチへの関心が高まっています。

総合的病害虫管理は、農薬の必要量を減らすのに役立ちます。益虫やフェロモントラップなどの生物的駆除剤は、農薬使用の必要性を最小限に抑えながら、自然で持続可能な害虫駆除方法を提供することで、総合的病害虫管理（IPM）において重要な役割を果たしています。輪作は、圃場内の異なる作物を長期間にわたって計画的に輪作することで、害虫のライフサイクルを乱し、害虫の個体数を減らすのに役立ちます。トラップ作物は、害虫にとって魅力的な特定の植物種で、害虫を主要作物から遠ざけ、害虫の個体数を駆除する罠の役割を果たします。抵抗性品種の使用は総合的病害虫管理（IPM）の効果的な要素であり、植物品種は特定の病害虫に対する固有の抵抗性や耐性を持つように特別に育成され、農薬散布の必要性を減らします。

市場力学

農薬の利点による総合的病害虫管理

IPMは、害虫管理に対する全体的かつ統合的なアプローチに重点を置いています。文化的実践、生物学的防除剤、害虫に強い作物品種など、さまざまな戦略を組み合わせ、化学農薬への依存を最小限に抑えます。このアプローチにより、農薬の使用量が全体的に削減され、その結果、食品への残留化学物質が減少し、環境汚染が減少し、人間の健康へのリスクが減少します。

IPMは、予防的および治療的手段を組み合わせて用いることで、効果的な害虫駆除を達成することを目的としています。複数の防除手段を用いることで、IPMは害虫の抵抗性の発達を最小限に抑えながら、害虫の個体数を効果的に管理することができます。このアプローチは、長期的にはより持続可能な有害生物管理の成果につながります。

農薬散布における技術的優位性が市場の成長を促進衛星画像や空撮ドローンなどのリモートセンシング技術と高度なデータ分析との組み合わせにより、作物の健康状態、害虫の発生状況、環境状態をリアルタイムでモニタリングすることが可能になります。この情報は、タイムリーで的を絞った農薬散布に役立ち、効果的な害虫駆除を保証し、不必要な農薬使用を最小限に抑えます。

デジタル・プラットフォームやソフトウェア・アプリケーションは、害虫管理の意思決定において農家を支援するために開発されています。これらのプラットフォームは、リアルタイムの病害虫アラート、モニタリング・システム、予測モデリングを提供し、農家が農薬散布について十分な情報に基づいた意思決定を行えるようにします。統合されたデジタル・プラットフォームは、害虫管理の効率と効果を高める。2022年9月21日、大手農業技術企業のひとつであるアグネクストは、静電式農薬散布機を市場に投入しました。

農薬の高い初期投資が総合的病害虫管理市場成長の妨げに

IPMを実施するには、モニタリング機器、害虫識別ツール、トラップ、フェロモン、その他の総合的病害虫管理技術など、さまざまなコンポーネントへの投資が必要となります。こうした初期投資は、特に小規模農家や資源が限られている農家にとっては大きな負担となります。IPMの実施を成功させるには、害虫の識別、モニタリング、害虫駆除手段の適切な適用に関する知識と技術が必要です。IPM戦略を理解し、効果的に実施するための研修や教育を農家や農業関係者に提供することは、全体的なコスト増につながります。

IPMには、文化的実践、生物学的防除、標的を絞った農薬散布など、複数の害虫管理技術を組み合わせた総合的アプローチが含まれます。この統合的アプローチは、従来の農薬をベースとしたアプローチに比べ、さらなる資源と労力を必要とする可能性があり、コスト上昇の一因となりうる。

COVID-19影響分析

パンデミックは、農薬やIPM関連製品の生産・流通を含む世界のサプライチェーンを混乱させました。輸送の制限、労働力の減少、物流の課題により、IPMの実践に必要な投入資材の入手に遅れや不足が生じています。パンデミックは、農業部門の優先順位と資源配分の変化を引き起こしました。政府や農家は、食糧安全保障の確保、不可欠な作物生産の維持、社会的弱者の保護に重点を置かざるを得なくなっています。この焦点の転換により、IPMの実践から一時的に注意や資源が逸れた可能性があります。

パンデミックは労働力不足と移動制限をもたらし、農家の労働力の確保に影響を与えました。このため、手作業による雑草防除や、専門的な労働力を必要とする生物学的防除剤の使用など、労働集約的なIPMの実施に影響が出た可能性があります。

ロシア・ウクライナ間の影響分析

紛争によりロシアとウクライナ間の貿易や輸送が途絶え、農薬やIPM製品を含む農業投入物のサプライチェーンに影響が及びました。このため、必要な資材の遅れや不足、価格の上昇が生じ、農民がIPMを効果的に入手し、実施することが困難になっています。紛争の結果、IPMの効果的な実施に必要な技術、設備、専門知識へのアクセスが制限されています。知識の交換、研修プログラム、調査・改良普及・農民間の協力も妨げられており、IPM手法の導入と普及に影響を与えています。

紛争とそれに伴う軍事行動やインフラ被害などの活動は、環境汚染につながる可能性があります。この汚染は土壌、水源、生態系の質に影響を及ぼす可能性があり、ひいてはIPMの実践や有害生物管理戦略の有効性にも影響を及ぼす可能性があります。

目次

第1章 調査手法と調査範囲

第2章 定義と概要

第3章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第4章 市場力学

  • 影響要因
    • 促進要因
    • 抑制要因
    • 影響分析

第5章 産業分析

  • ポーターのファイブフォース分析
  • サプライチェーン分析
  • 価格分析
  • 規制分析

第6章 COVID-19分析

第7章 タイプ別

  • 除草剤
  • 殺虫剤
  • 殺菌剤
  • その他

第8章 防除タイプ別

  • 物理的
  • 化学的防除剤
  • 生物的防除

第9章 用途別

  • 農業
  • 非農業

第10章 製品タイプ別

  • 特許
  • 特許外製品
  • ポストパテント

第11章 ステータス別

  • レギュラー
  • 有機認証

第12章 地域別

  • 北米
    • 米国
    • カナダ
    • メキシコ
  • 欧州
    • ドイツ
    • 英国
    • フランス
    • イタリア
    • スペイン
    • その他欧州
  • 南米
    • ブラジル
    • アルゼンチン
    • その他南米
  • アジア太平洋
    • 中国
    • インド
    • 日本
    • オーストラリア
    • その他アジア太平洋地域
  • 中東・アフリカ

第13章 競合情勢

  • 競合シナリオ
  • 市況/シェア分析
  • M&A分析

第14章 企業プロファイル

  • Syngenta
    • 会社概要
    • 製品ポートフォリオと説明
    • 財務概要
    • 主な発展
  • Bayer
  • DowDuPont
  • BASF
  • ADAMA Agricultural Solutions
  • Nufarm Limited
  • FMC
  • Sumitomo Chemical
  • United Phosphorus Ltd
  • Arysta Lifescience

第15章 付録

目次
Product Code: AG1875

Market Overview

Global Pesticides Integrated Pest Management Market reached US$ 17.8 billion in 2022 and is expected to reach US$ 26.4 billion by 2030 growing with a CAGR of 5.1% during the forecast period 2023-2030.

One market trend in the field of pesticides integrated pest management is the increasing demand for sustainable and environmentally-friendly pest control solutions. Consumers and agricultural industries are becoming more conscious of the potential negative impacts of conventional pesticides on human health and the environment, leading to a growing interest in integrated pest management approaches that prioritize ecological balance and minimize chemical inputs.

Integrated pest management helps to reduce pesticides requirement. Biological control agents, such as beneficial insects and the use of pheromone traps, play a vital role in integrated pest management (IPM) by providing natural and sustainable methods of pest control while minimizing the need for pesticide use. Crop rotation involves the systematic rotation of different crops in a field over time, which helps disrupt pest life cycles and reduce pest populations. Trap crops are specific plant species that are attractive to pests, diverting them away from the main crop and serving as a trap to control their populations. The use of resistant varieties is an effective component of integrated pest management (IPM), where plant cultivars are specifically bred to have inherent resistance or tolerance to certain pests, reducing the need for pesticide application.

Market Dynamics

Benefits Associated With Pesticides Integrated Pest Management

IPM focuses on a holistic and integrated approach to pest management. It combines various strategies such as cultural practices, biological control agents, and pest-resistant crop varieties to minimize the reliance on chemical pesticides. This approach reduces the overall use of pesticides, resulting in lower chemical residues in food, reduced environmental contamination, and decreased risks to human health.

IPM aims to achieve effective pest control by employing a combination of preventive and curative measures. By using multiple control tactics, IPM can effectively manage pest populations while minimizing the development of resistance in pests. This approach leads to more sustainable pest management outcomes in the long run.

Technological Advantages in the Application of Pesticides Drives Market Growth Remote sensing technologies, such as satellite imagery and aerial drones, coupled with advanced data analytics, allow for real-time monitoring of crop health, pest infestations, and environmental conditions. This information helps in timely and targeted application of pesticides, ensuring effective pest control and minimizing unnecessary pesticide use.

Digital platforms and software applications are being developed to assist farmers in pest management decision-making. These platforms provide real-time pest and disease alerts, monitoring systems, and predictive modeling, enabling farmers to make informed decisions about pesticide applications. Integrated digital platforms enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of pest management practices. On September 21 2022, AgNext, one of the leading agrotech company launched electrostatic-based pesticide sprayer in the market.

High Initial Investment of the Pesticides Integrated Pest Management Hamper the Market Growth

Implementing IPM requires investments in various components such as monitoring equipment, pest identification tools, traps, pheromones, and other integrated pest management techniques. These initial investments can be significant, especially for small-scale farmers or those with limited resources. Successful implementation of IPM requires knowledge and skills in pest identification, monitoring, and appropriate application of control measures. Providing training and education to farmers and agricultural practitioners to understand and implement IPM strategies effectively adds to the overall cost.

IPM involves a holistic approach that combines multiple pest management techniques such as cultural practices, biological controls, and targeted pesticide applications. This integrated approach may require additional resources and efforts compared to conventional pesticide-based approaches, which can contribute to higher costs.

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

The pandemic has disrupted global supply chains, including the production and distribution of pesticides and IPM-related products. Restrictions on transportation, reduced workforce, and logistical challenges have led to delays and shortages in the availability of necessary inputs for IPM practices. The pandemic has caused a shift in priorities and resource allocation in the agriculture sector. Governments and farmers have had to focus on ensuring food security, maintaining essential crop production, and protecting vulnerable populations. This shift in focus may have temporarily diverted attention and resources from implementing IPM practices.

The pandemic has resulted in labor shortages and mobility restrictions, affecting farm labor availability. This may have impacted the implementation of labor-intensive IPM practices, such as manual weed control or the use of biological control agents that require specialized labor.

Russia-Ukraine Impact Analysis

The conflict has led to disruptions in trade and transportation between Russia and Ukraine, affecting the supply chains of agricultural inputs, including pesticides and IPM products. This has caused delays, shortages, and increased prices of essential materials, making it challenging for farmers to access and implement IPM practices effectively. The conflict has resulted in limited access to technology, equipment, and expertise needed for effective IPM implementation. The exchange of knowledge, training programs, and collaboration between researchers, extension services, and farmers have been hampered, impacting the adoption and advancement of IPM practices.

The conflict and its associated activities, such as military operations and infrastructure damage, can lead to environmental contamination. This contamination can affect the quality of soil, water sources, and ecosystems, which in turn may have implications for IPM practices and the effectiveness of pest management strategies.

Segment Analysis

The global pesticides integrated pest management market is segmented based on type, control type, application, product type, status and region.

Increase in the Application of Insecticides Globally

Insecticides are a type of pesticide specifically designed to control or eliminate insects. They are widely used in agriculture, public health, and residential settings to manage insect pests that can damage crops, spread diseases, or cause nuisance. Insecticides work by targeting the nervous system, physiology, or behavior of insects, leading to their death or inhibition of their ability to reproduce. They come in various forms, including sprays, dusts, baits, and systemic treatments. It is important to use insecticides according to the label instructions and follow recommended safety precautions to ensure effective pest control while minimizing potential risks to non-target organisms and the environment.

Increase in the product launches by major key players helps to boost segment growth over the forecast period. For instance, On April 04 2022, Nissan Chemical, a japenese chemical company launched two products in the market named as Izuki is a fungicide and Shinwa is a novel insecticide.

Geographical Analysis

Increasing Product Launches by Major Key players in the Asia-Pacific Region

Governments in the Asia Pacific region are implementing regulations and policies to promote sustainable agriculture and reduce the reliance on chemical pesticides. These regulations encourage the adoption of IPM practices and create a favourable market environment for IPM products and services. The Asia Pacific market for Pesticides Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is experiencing growth due to the increasing demand for sustainable agriculture practices, regulatory support, technological advancements, and consumer preferences for organic and environmentally friendly produce.

Increase in the product launches by major key players helps to boost regional growth. For instance, On April 22 2021, FarmHannong's launched new Terrad'or herbicide in Asia Pacific region. It is effective against various types of grasses including ryegrass.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the market include: Syngenta, Bayer, DowDuPont, BASF, ADAMA Agricultural Solutions, Nufarm Limited, FMC, Sumitomo Chemical, United Phosphorus Ltd, Arysta Lifescience.

Why Purchase the Report?

  • To visualize the global pesticides integrated pest management market segmentation based on type, control type, application, product type, status and region to understand key commercial assets and players.
  • Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
  • Excel data sheet with numerous pesticides integrated pest management market-level data points all for segments.
  • PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
  • Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global Pesticides Integrated Pest Management market report would provide approximately 77 tables, 99 figures and 102 pages.

Target Audience 2023

  • Manufacturers/ Buyers
  • Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
  • Research Professionals
  • Emerging Companies

Table of Contents

1. Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1. Research Methodology
  • 1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Snippet by Type
  • 3.2. Snippet by Control Type
  • 3.3. Snippet by Application
  • 3.4. Snippet by Product Type
  • 3.5. Snippet by Status
  • 3.6. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

  • 4.1. Impacting Factors
    • 4.1.1. Drivers
    • 4.1.2. Restraints
    • 4.1.3. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

  • 5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
  • 5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.3. Pricing Analysis
  • 5.4. Regulatory Analysis

6. COVID-19 Analysis

  • 6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
    • 6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID-19
    • 6.1.2. Scenario During COVID-19
    • 6.1.3. Scenario Post COVID-19
  • 6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
  • 6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
  • 6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
  • 6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
  • 6.6. Conclusion

7. By Type

  • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Type
  • 7.2. Herbicide*
    • 7.2.1. Introduction
    • 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 7.3. Insecticide
  • 7.4. Fungicide
  • 7.5. Others

8. By Control Type

  • 8.1. Introduction
    • 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Control Type
    • 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Control Type
  • 8.2. Physical*
    • 8.2.1. Introduction
    • 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 8.3. Chemical
  • 8.4. Biological

9. By Application

  • 9.1. Introduction
    • 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Application
  • 9.2. Agriculture*
    • 9.2.1. Introduction
    • 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 9.3. Non-agriculture

10. By Product Type

  • 10.1. Introduction
    • 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
    • 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Product Type
  • 10.2. Patent*
    • 10.2.1. Introduction
    • 10.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 10.3. Proprietary off-patent
  • 10.4. Post patent

11. By Status

  • 11.1. Introduction
    • 11.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Status
    • 11.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Status
  • 11.2. Regular*
    • 11.2.1. Introduction
    • 11.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 11.3. Organic-Certified

12. By Region

  • 12.1. Introduction
    • 12.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
    • 12.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
  • 12.2. North America
    • 12.2.1. Introduction
    • 12.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 12.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 12.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Control Type
    • 12.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 12.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
    • 12.2.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Status
    • 12.2.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 12.2.8.1. The U.S.
      • 12.2.8.2. Canada
      • 12.2.8.3. Mexico
  • 12.3. Europe
    • 12.3.1. Introduction
    • 12.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 12.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 12.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Control Type
    • 12.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 12.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
    • 12.3.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Status
    • 12.3.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 12.3.8.1. Germany
      • 12.3.8.2. The U.K.
      • 12.3.8.3. France
      • 12.3.8.4. Italy
      • 12.3.8.5. Spain
      • 12.3.8.6. Rest of Europe
  • 12.4. South America
    • 12.4.1. Introduction
    • 12.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 12.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 12.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Control Type
    • 12.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 12.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
    • 12.4.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Status
    • 12.4.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 12.4.8.1. Brazil
      • 12.4.8.2. Argentina
      • 12.4.8.3. Rest of South America
  • 12.5. Asia-Pacific
    • 12.5.1. Introduction
    • 12.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 12.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 12.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Control Type
    • 12.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 12.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
    • 12.5.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Status
    • 12.5.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 12.5.8.1. China
      • 12.5.8.2. India
      • 12.5.8.3. Japan
      • 12.5.8.4. Australia
      • 12.5.8.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 12.6. Middle East and Africa
    • 12.6.1. Introduction
    • 12.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 12.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 12.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Control Type
    • 12.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 12.6.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
    • 12.6.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Status

13. Competitive Landscape

  • 13.1. Competitive Scenario
  • 13.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
  • 13.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

14. Company Profiles

  • 14.1. Syngenta*
    • 14.1.1. Company Overview
    • 14.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
    • 14.1.3. Financial Overview
    • 14.1.4. Key Developments
  • 14.2. Bayer
  • 14.3. DowDuPont
  • 14.4. BASF
  • 14.5. ADAMA Agricultural Solutions
  • 14.6. Nufarm Limited
  • 14.7. FMC
  • 14.8. Sumitomo Chemical
  • 14.9. United Phosphorus Ltd
  • 14.10. Arysta Lifescience

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

15. Appendix

  • 15.1. About Us and Services
  • 15.2. Contact Us