サンプル依頼リスト カート
  • English
  • Korean
  • Traditional Chinese
  • Simplified Chinese
表紙：整形外科用パワーツールの世界市場-2023年～2030年
市場調査レポート
商品コード
1297780

整形外科用パワーツールの世界市場-2023年～2030年

Global Orthopedic Power Tools Market - 2023-2030
出版日: | 発行: DataM Intelligence | ページ情報: 英文 195 Pages | 納期: 約2営業日

● お客様のご希望に応じて、既存データの加工や未掲載情報（例：国別セグメント）の追加などの対応が可能です。　 詳細はお問い合わせください。

価格
価格表記: USDを日本円(税抜)に換算
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=156.76円
整形外科用パワーツールの世界市場-2023年～2030年
出版日: 2023年06月15日
発行: DataM Intelligence
ページ情報: 英文 195 Pages
納期: 約2営業日
ご注意事項 :
本レポートは最新情報反映のため適宜更新し、内容構成変更を行う場合があります。ご検討の際はお問い合わせください。
  • 全表示
  • 概要
  • 目次
概要

市場概要

整形外科用パワーツールの世界市場は、2022年に20億米ドルに達し、2030年には30億米ドルに達するなど、有利な成長が予測されています。整形外科用パワーツールの世界市場は、予測期間2023-2030年にCAGR 5.3％を示すと予測されています。技術の進歩が進み、パワーツールの利点が高まっていることが、整形外科用パワーツールの市場動向を牽引しています。

外科手術用パワーツールは、骨または骨片の手術に使用されます。ドリル、切断、リーマー、ネジ切りが可能です。主に人間や動物の整形外科手術、神経学、外傷学、耳鼻咽喉科手術で利用されます。創傷処置のためのパルス洗浄から、長骨骨折の髄内釘やスクリューを挿入するためのドリルやリーミングまで、今日の整形外科手術ではあらゆる段階で動力器具が使用されています。これらの器具は、使用者の利便性を考慮して軽量化されるなど、さらなる改良が加えられています。

より薄く、より軽く、繰り返し使用しても発熱の少ない金属合金が使用されることが多くなっています。

整形外科用パワーツールの市場範囲は、空気圧駆動システム、バッテリー駆動システム、電動システムなどの技術で構成され、整形外科用パワーツールの市場シェアを伸ばしています。整形外科用パワーツールの世界市場は、外科用パワーツールの進歩の増加や、各国での医療認可の取得予定などの要因により拡大しており、整形外科用パワーツール市場の成長に明るい見通しをもたらしています。

市場力学

パワーツールが提供する利点が整形外科用パワーツール市場の成長を促進します

外科医は外科手術用パワーツールの大半を使用しています。外科医の主な目的は、多くの手術を短時間で完了させることです。より多くの患者を治療するためには、効率的かつ手頃な価格で手術を行う必要があります。外科医が信頼できる器具があれば、患者はシステムの故障の有無を心配することなく、挿入するインプラントをより正確に配置することに集中できます。使い方が簡単な手術用電動機器は、手術前や手術中の遅延をなくします。器具の準備が早く、術中に外科医がモーターに実行させたいタスクを簡単に達成できれば、補助ユーザーは安心し、より自信を持つことができます。

自動洗浄が可能な高品質の手術用電動器具を使用する場合、洗浄スタッフはより短時間で器具に触れなければならなくなります。整形外科手術にはそれぞれ独自の手術用電動器具が必要なため、多数の手術室を持ち、毎日の症例数が多い病院では、通常、より手頃な価格の器具が好まれます。ハイエンドで投資価値の高い機器を避けることは、有利であると考えられています。

技術進歩のための研究開発の高まりは、メーカーに有利な機会を生み出します

手作業でナビゲートする整形外科機器の欠点に対処するため、過去10年間に多くのシステムが誕生したため、手術に使用されるロボットシステムの種類は拡大しています。ロボットシステムの2つの利点は、安全性の向上と異所性損傷の減少です。

ロボットナビゲーションを振動鋸と併用すれば、人工膝関節全置換術の際、フリーハンドの方法と比較して、異所性損傷のリスクをかなり軽減することができます。別の研究では、ロボット支援による頸椎の経会陰ネジ留置術が検討されました。その結果、非ロボットガイド下での埋入に比べ、機能的な結果が向上し、キルシュナー・ワイヤーの埋入精度が98.8％に達することが判明しました。

また、ロボット支援によるペディクル・スクリュー留置を利用した別の研究でも、透視ガイドによる手技と比較して、脊椎手術の精度が向上していることが発見されました。以上のことから、高度な調査が整形外科用パワーツール市場の成長機会を生み出していることがわかる

市場の成長を妨げる整形外科用パワーツールの欠点。

パワーツールの利用には、熱壊死、ドリルビットの破損、近隣の組織構造への傷害、穿孔のし過ぎや見過ぎなどの欠点があります。ガジェットを使用する外科医は、このような現象について知っておくことが有益であり、技術者はより優れた安全な医療機器の開発に取り組んでいます。

頭頸部外科用の組織選択的圧電ドリルや神経外科用の自己停止ドリルは、安全性を重視するあまり、他の分野で需要が高まり、開発が進んでいる機器の一例に過ぎないです。

血管損傷、腱損傷、神経損傷は、整形外科における異所性損傷の一例であり、深刻な影響を及ぼす可能性があります。先行研究では、人工股関節全置換術における血管損傷の7.3％が死亡に至ることが明らかにされています。ロボット工学、最先端のドリル技術、瞬時のフィードバック機構など、こうした傷害を減らすための戦略が開発されつつあります。したがって、これらの上記の要因が整形外科用パワーツール市場の成長を制限しています。

COVID-19影響分析

COVID-19分析には、COVID前シナリオ、COVIDシナリオ、COVID後シナリオに加え、価格力学（COVID前シナリオとの比較によるパンデミック発生中と発生後の価格変動を含む）、需給スペクトラム（取引制限、封鎖、その後の問題による需要と供給のシフト）、政府の取り組み（政府機関による市場、産業、セクターの再活性化の取り組み）、メーカーの戦略的取り組みが含まれます。

ロシア・ウクライナ紛争の影響分析

ロシアとウクライナの紛争は、この地域の主要市場プレーヤーの数が少ないため、世界の整形外科用パワーツール市場に与える影響は低いと推定されます。しかし、原材料の輸出入の影響は、予測期間中、整形外科用パワーツールの世界市場の成長にほとんど影響を与えないと予測されます。

目次

第1章 調査手法と調査範囲

第2章 定義と概要

第3章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第4章 市場力学

  • 影響要因
    • 促進要因
      • 低侵襲手術の普及拡大
      • 骨折の有病率の上昇
    • 抑制要因
      • 病院の統合とコスト抑制圧力
    • 機会
      • 新しい技術の進歩
    • 影響分析

第5章 産業分析

  • ポーターの5フォース分析
  • サプライチェーン分析
  • 価格分析
  • 規制分析

第6章 COVID-19分析

第7章 製品タイプ別

  • 大骨整形外科用パワーツール
  • 小骨整形外科用パワーツール
  • 高速整形外科用パワーツール
  • 整形外科用リーマー

第8章 技術別

  • 空気圧式システム
  • バッテリー駆動システム
  • 電動式システム

第9章 エンドユーザー別

  • 病院
  • 整形外科クリニック
  • 外来手術センター
  • その他

第10章 地域別

  • 北米
    • 米国
    • カナダ
    • メキシコ
  • 欧州
    • ドイツ
    • 英国
    • フランス
    • イタリア
    • スペイン
    • その他欧州
  • 南米
    • ブラジル
    • アルゼンチン
    • その他南米
  • アジア太平洋
    • 中国
    • インド
    • 日本
    • オーストラリア
    • その他アジア太平洋地域
  • 中東・アフリカ

第11章 競合情勢

  • 競合シナリオ
  • 市況/シェア分析
  • M&A分析

第12章 企業プロファイル

  • Zimmer Biomet
    • 会社概要
    • 製品タイプ別ポートフォリオと説明
    • 財務概要
    • 主な発展
  • CONMED Corporation
  • Stryker Inc
  • DePuy Synthes（J&J）
  • Medtronic
  • Misonix Inc
  • Aesculap, Inc（B. Braun）
  • Portescap
  • Brasseler USA
  • Maxon

第13章 付録

目次
Product Code: MD723

Market Overview

The Global Orthopedic Power Tools Market reached US$ 2 billion in 2022 and is projected to witness lucrative growth by reaching up to US$ 3 billion by 2030. The global orthopedic power tools market is expected to exhibit a CAGR of 5.3% during the forecast period 2023-2030. The increasing technological advancements and rising advantages for power tools drive demand for orthopedic power tools market trends.

A surgical power tool is used in bone or bone fragment surgery. It makes it possible to drill, cut, ream, and screw. It is mostly utilized in orthopedic surgery, neurology, traumatology, and ENT surgery in humans and animals. Every stage of orthopedic surgery today uses power instruments, from pulse lavage for wound care to drilling and reaming for inserting intramedullary nails or screws in long bone fractures. Further improvements have been made to these tools to make them lightweight for user convenience.

More frequently, metal alloys that are thinner, lighter, and produce less heat when used repeatedly are being used.

The orthopedic power tools market scope comprises technology such as pneumatic-powered systems, battery-operated systems, electric-powered systems and others, which has increased the orthopedic power tools market share. The Global Market for Orthopedic Power tools is expanding due to factors, including the increasing advances in surgical power tools and their upcoming medical approvals across countries, creating a positive outlook for the orthopedic power tools market growth.

Market Dynamics

Advantages Provided by the Power Tools drive the growth of the orthopedic power tools market.

Surgeons use the majority of surgical power tools. Their main objective is to complete numerous surgeries in a fair amount of time. To treat more patients, they must thus work effectively and affordably. With a device the surgeon can rely on, the patient can concentrate on a more precise placement of the implant that will be inserted without worrying about whether or not the system will malfunction. The simple-to-use surgical power instruments eliminate any delays prior to or during the procedure. The auxiliary users will feel relieved and more confident if the device is prepared quickly and can easily accomplish the task the surgeon wants the motor to carry out during the procedure.

When using high-quality surgical power instruments that can be cleaned automatically, the cleaning staff will have to interact with the equipment for a shorter period of time. Since each orthopedic procedure requires a unique set of surgical power instruments, hospitals with numerous operating rooms and a high volume of daily cases typically prefer more affordable devices. Avoiding high-end, high-investment-grade equipment is seen to be advantageous.

Growing Research and Development for Technological Advancements creates lucrative opportunities for manufacturers.

The variety of robotic systems used in surgery is expanding due to the many systems created in the past ten years to address the shortcomings of manually navigated orthopedic equipment. Two advantages of robotic systems are improved security and decreased iatrogenic injuries.

When used in conjunction with oscillating saws, robotic navigation can considerably reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury compared to freehand methods during total knee arthroplasty. In a different study, robotic-assisted cervical transpedicular screw placement was examined. It was discovered that, compared to non-robotic-guided placement, it had enhanced functional results and reached 98.8% accuracy in Kirschner wire placement.

Compared to fluoroscopy-guided procedures, another study utilizing robotically aided pedicle screw placement likewise discovered improved accuracy in spine surgery. The abovementioned factors show that high research creates opportunities for orthopedic power tools market growth.

Disadvantages of Orthopedic Power Tool which will hamper the growth of the market.

Utilizing power tools has drawbacks, including heat necrosis, drill bit breakage, injury to nearby tissue structures, and over drilling and overwatching. The surgeon using the gadget would benefit from knowing about these occurrences and technologists working to create better and safer medical equipment.

Tissue-selective piezoelectric drills for head and neck surgery and self-stopping drills for neurosurgery are only two examples of the kind of equipment that are in demand and being developed in other disciplines because they are more and more safety-focused.

Vascular, tendon and neurological injuries are examples of iatrogenic injuries in orthopedics that can have serious repercussions; a prior study revealed that 7.3% of vascular wounds in total hip arthroplasty result in mortality. Some strategies, including robotics, cutting-edge drill technology, and instantaneous feedback mechanisms, are being developed to lessen these injuries. Hence these above-mentioned factors are limiting the orthopedic power tools market's growth.

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

The COVID-19 Analysis includes the Pre-COVID Scenario, COVID Scenario, and Post-COVID Scenario in addition to Pricing Dynamics (Including pricing change during and after the pandemic evaluating it with pre-COVID scenarios), Demand-Supply Spectrum (Shift in demand and supply due to trading restrictions, lockdown, and afterward issues), Government Initiatives (Initiatives to reactivate a market, industry, or sector by Government Bodies), and Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives.

Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis

The Russia-Ukraine conflict is estimated to have a low impact on the global orthopedic power tools market, owing to the low number of key market players in this region. However, the effect of the import and export of raw materials is expected to have little influence over the global orthopedic power tools market growth over the forecast period.

Segment Analysis

The Global Orthopedic Power Tools Market is segmented based on product type, technology, end user and region.

Battery Operated Systems from the technology segment account for 45.9% of the market share owing to rising novel product launches.

Drills powered by batteries may be used for hardware engineering or orthopedics. Orthopedic battery drills (OBDs) sold commercially are highly expensive. However, hardware/engineering battery drills (HBD or EBD) can provide the same function while offering some extra practical benefits. The "hardware"/engineering battery drill (EBD) is frequently used in orthopedic surgery. Compared to commercial orthopedic battery drills (OBDs), EBDs have a significant advantage.

These EBDs are excellent alternatives to OBD in hospitals when surgical cost is a concern and resources are limited since they are affordable, user-friendly, have numerous capabilities in orthopedic procedures, are locally bought and easily serviced, have minimal maintenance costs, are tough, and are durable. Several advancements, such as a lightweight, comfortable system with the strength required for reconstructive surgeries and the adaptability required for ortho trauma treatments, are what the X Series Power System by Zimmer Biomet is designed to provide.

Geographical Analysis

Due to major players' strong presence and increasing technological advancements, North America accounted for approximately 39.9% of the market share.

Manufacturers have chances to expand their operations in this region because of the rising demand for orthopedic power tools for advancements in North America. The area has many producers and suppliers, and its rapid economic development has raised the industrial production of orthopedic power tools, increasing demand. North America has a large number of producers and suppliers. As a result of the swift economic development of the area, industrial production has increased, fueling the demand of orthopedic power tools.

Rising new product types or applications will drive market growth. Growth is also fueled by rising technological advancements, regulatory approvals, and novel product launches. Researchers are becoming more aware of various treatment approaches for orthopedic disorders, leading to the expansion of the market in this region. These factors shows the dominance of North America.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the orthopedic power tools market include: CONMED Corporation, Zimmer Biomet, Stryker Inc, Medtronic, DePuy Synthes (J&J), Integra LifeSciences, Aesculap, Inc (B. Braun), Portescap, Misonix Inc., Brasseler USA and Maxon among others.

Why Purchase the Report?

  • To visualize the Global Orthopedic Power Tools Market segmentation based on product type, technology, end-user and region, and understand key commercial assets and players.
  • Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
  • Excel data sheet with numerous orthopedic power tools market-level data points with all segments.
  • PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
  • Product mapping available as Excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The Global Orthopedic Power Tools Market Report Would Provide Approximately 53 Tables, 54 Figures And 195 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

  • Manufacturers/ Buyers
  • Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
  • Research Professionals
  • Emerging Companies

Table of Contents

1. Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1. Research Methodology
  • 1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Snippet by Product Type
  • 3.2. Snippet by Technology
  • 3.3. Snippet by End-User
  • 3.4. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

  • 4.1. Impacting Factors
    • 4.1.1. Drivers
      • 4.1.1.1. Growing Prevalence of Minimally Invasive Surgeries
      • 4.1.1.2. Rising Prevalence of Fractures
    • 4.1.2. Restraints
      • 4.1.2.1. Hospital Consolidation and Cost-Containment Pressures
    • 4.1.3. Opportunity
      • 4.1.3.1. Growing Novel Technological Advancements
    • 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

  • 5.1. Porter's 5 Forces Analysis
  • 5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.3. Pricing Analysis
  • 5.4. Regulatory Analysis

6. COVID-19 Analysis

  • 6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
    • 6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID-19
    • 6.1.2. Scenario During COVID-19
    • 6.1.3. Post COVID-19 & Future Scenario
  • 6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
  • 6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
  • 6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During the Pandemic
  • 6.5. Manufacturers' Strategic Initiatives
  • 6.6. Conclusion

7. By Product Type

  • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
    • 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Product Type
  • 7.2. Large bone orthopedic power tools *
    • 7.2.1. Introduction
    • 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 7.3. Small bone orthopedic power tools
  • 7.4. High speed orthopedic power tools
  • 7.5. Orthopedic reamers

8. By Technology

  • 8.1. Introduction
    • 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
    • 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Technology
  • 8.2. Pneumatic powered systems *
    • 8.2.1. Introduction
    • 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 8.3. Battery-operated systems
  • 8.4. Electric powered systems

9. By End-User

  • 9.1. Introduction
    • 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By End-User
  • 9.2. Hospitals *
    • 9.2.1. Introduction
    • 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 9.3. Orthopedic clinics
  • 9.4. Ambulatory surgical centers
  • 9.5. Others

10. By Region

  • 10.1. Introduction
    • 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
    • 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
  • 10.2. North America
    • 10.2.1. Introduction
    • 10.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
    • 10.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
    • 10.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 10.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.2.6.1. The U.S.
      • 10.2.6.2. Canada
      • 10.2.6.3. Mexico
  • 10.3. Europe
    • 10.3.1. Introduction
    • 10.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
    • 10.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
    • 10.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 10.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.3.6.1. Germany
      • 10.3.6.2. The U.K.
      • 10.3.6.3. France
      • 10.3.6.4. Italy
      • 10.3.6.5. Spain
      • 10.3.6.6. Rest of Europe
  • 10.4. South America
    • 10.4.1. Introduction
    • 10.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
    • 10.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
    • 10.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 10.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.4.6.1. Brazil
      • 10.4.6.2. Argentina
      • 10.4.6.3. Rest of South America
  • 10.5. Asia-Pacific
    • 10.5.1. Introduction
    • 10.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
    • 10.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
    • 10.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 10.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.5.6.1. China
      • 10.5.6.2. India
      • 10.5.6.3. Japan
      • 10.5.6.4. Australia
      • 10.5.6.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 10.6. Middle East and Africa
    • 10.6.1. Introduction
    • 10.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
    • 10.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
    • 10.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User

11. Competitive Landscape

  • 11.1. Competitive Scenario
  • 11.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
  • 11.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

12. Company Profiles

  • 12.1. Zimmer Biomet *
    • 12.1.1. Company Overview
    • 12.1.2. Product Type Portfolio and Description
    • 12.1.3. Financial Overview
    • 12.1.4. Key Developments
  • 12.2. CONMED Corporation
  • 12.3. Stryker Inc
  • 12.4. DePuy Synthes (J&J)
  • 12.5. Medtronic
  • 12.6. Misonix Inc
  • 12.7. Aesculap, Inc (B. Braun)
  • 12.8. Portescap
  • 12.9. Brasseler USA
  • 12.10. Maxon

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

13. Appendix

  • 13.1. About Us and Services
  • 13.2. Contact Us