表紙
市場調査レポート

股関節・膝関節整形外科インプラント:世界市場シェア・戦略・予測 2016-2022年

Hip and Knee Orthopedic Surgical Implants: Market Shares, Strategies, and Forecasts, Worldwide, 2016-2022

発行 WinterGreen Research, Inc. 商品コード 350431
出版日 ページ情報 英文 360 Pages
即納可能
価格
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=101.75円で換算しております。
Back to Top
股関節・膝関節整形外科インプラント:世界市場シェア・戦略・予測 2016-2022年 Hip and Knee Orthopedic Surgical Implants: Market Shares, Strategies, and Forecasts, Worldwide, 2016-2022
出版日: 2016年01月06日 ページ情報: 英文 360 Pages
概要

世界における股関節・膝関節の整形外科関節置換製品市場は167億米ドル規模となっていますが、2022年までに330億米ドルに達すると予測されています。

レポートでは、世界の股関節・膝関節整形外科インプラント市場について包括的に調査し、手術件数、販売台数、市場規模、予測、および市場シェアの分析を提供しており、主要企業の各セグメント・2次セグメントにおける成功、課題、および戦略についてまとめています。

膝・股関節整形外科インプラント市場:エグゼクティブサマリー

  • 市場成長促進因子
  • 市場シェア
  • 予測

第1章 膝・股関節整形外科インプラント市場の概説・市場ダイナミクス

  • 医療領域における課題
  • 整形外科再建インプラント
  • 教育の継続
  • 膝整形外科再建インプラント
  • 股関節インプラント

第2章 膝・股関節手術ロボット市場のシェア・市場予測

  • 膝・股関節整形外科インプラント市場の促進因子
  • 膝・股関節手術ロボット市場のシェア
  • 膝・股関節手術インプラントの予測
  • 膝・股関節整形外科手術の分析
  • 膝・股関節手術ロボットの地域分析

第3章 膝・股関節手術ロボット製品

  • Zimmer Holdings / Biomet Hip
  • Smith & Nephew
  • Johnson and Johnson / DePuy Hip
  • Stryker
  • Microport Profemur / Z Hip Stem System
  • Corin
  • DJO Hip
  • Exactech
  • ConforMIS
  • Medacta
  • B. Braun / Aesculap AG
  • Waldemar LINK GmbH & Co.
  • Mathys AG
  • Wright Medical Technology

第4章 膝・股関節手術の研究・技術・規制

  • セメント/セメント無しインプラント
  • 股関節置換の問題についての詳細説明
  • 股関節インプラントの失敗
  • 規制

第5章 膝・股関節手術企業の概説

  • B Braun / Aesculap
  • ConforMIS
  • DJO
  • Exactech
  • Johnson and Johnson / Depuy
  • Corin
  • Mathys
  • Medacta
  • MicroPort Scientific Corporation
  • Shenzhen Advanced Institute Spinal Surgical Robot
  • Smith & Nephew
  • Stryker Corporation
  • THINK Surgical
  • Waldemar LINK GmbH & Co.
  • Wright Medical Technology
  • Zimmer Biomet

図表リスト

目次
Product Code: SH26584999

Worldwide hip and knee orthopedic surgical Implant markets are poised to achieve significant growth with the aging of the population.

Old people have trouble making their joints last as long as they do. The patient stability and the relief from pain provided by the implant is compelling. The major suppliers are providing implants that are state of the art. Orthopedic reconstructive implants are used to replace joints that have deteriorated. Deterioration may come as a result of aging, disease, osteoarthritis, or injury.

Total hip replacement surgery has evolved dramatically over the years as advances in technology have made it possible to improve surgical techniques. 325,000 people had total hip replacement surgery in 2015 in the United States. Computer-assisted total hip replacement surgery is one of the latest revolutions in total hip replacement.

Zimmer is the market leader by far in the hip and knee orthopedic implant market. Zimmer® M/L taper hip prosthesis has Kinectiv® modular neck technology. This is better than traditional hip replacements that have had limited size and shape choices. Doctors typically adjusted the hip bone to fit the implant. Hip replacements with Zimmer Kinectiv Technology give surgeons a wide range of options to achieve a more accurate fit of the joint replacement to the hip.

Reconstructive joint surgery involves the modification of the affected area of the joint and the implantation of one or more manufactured components. It may involve the use of bone cement. The primary orthopedic reconstructive targets are joints. Hips and knees are the joints most commonly repaired with orthopedic implants.

Orthopedic implant vendors produce associated instruments. Instruments are required by orthopedic surgeons to implant reconstructive products.

Interdisciplinary dialog in medicine through its extensive continuing education offerings is a vital part of the hip and knee implant joint replacement market. System partnership means even more intensive exchange to continuously improve patient care. The company seeks to actively contribute extensive knowledge of procurement, logistics and application processes to the medical community.

The aim is to increase efficiency of joint implant surgery in hospitals. Depending on the type of disorder, the activity level of the patient and the bone quality, the most suitable implant model is selected and fixated in the bone. A great number of implants for artificial hip replacement are available. The difference between individual models and manufacturers is small, all products are technologically sophisticated and good. Surgeon adoption of an implant product line provides competitive advantage.

The surgeon selects an implant based on the devices for which he or she is trained. Surgeons tend to be proficient in a particular device and have the most success implanting that one. The surgeon decision for choice of implant depends on the diagnosis, his or her own experience with the implant products, and the suitability of the selected implant for the patient.

Implant assisted medial knee arthroplasty: orthopedic surgical implants are poised to take knee and hip surgery quality far beyond what has previously been available. The quality of knee arthroplasty is improved with implant capability. All the advantages of surgical implants carry into the orthopedic reconstruction surgical products.. When the knee and hip surgical implants are used, patients have reduction of post-operative pain, fewer re-admissions to hospital and faster recovery. Implants support high-precision surgery.

Knee and hip surgical implants need robots to provide consistent reproducible precision. Knee or hip replacement will demand attention to quality of life. Maintenance of lifestyle provided by an implant as a joint replacement is compelling. As next generation systems, hip and knee implants provide a way to improve traditional orthopedic hip and knee replacement surgery. Total hip replacement surgery has evolved dramatically as advances in technology have brought improved surgical techniques. Surgical implants are a significant part of that advance.

Once, the penetration achieves this 35% level, all orthopedic surgeons will demand that hospitals offer implant orthopedic surgical capability because the outcomes are more predictable and better.

Knee and hip surgical implant markets have been impacted by the reduction in insurance payments. Payment reductions have forced hospitals to act as businesses. The cost of delivering care has become as much a factor as providing quality care when making decisions about patient improvement in condition. Cost-cutting has been made in the supply chain. Suppliers were examined closely for quality and cost.

The number of suppliers is reduced to put pressure on the ones that remain. Those remaining are pressured to improve prices and efficiencies. Hospitals, physicians, and care providers have been financially incentivized to create accountable care organizations (ACOs). Coordinated patient care plans and value-based purchasing were rewarded. The med device buyer shifted from physicians to the ACOs and smart buying groups.

According to Susan Eustis, lead author of the study, "Use of the orthopedic implant represents a key milestone in reconstructive surgery. Implants have provided an opportunity to transform orthopedics. New materials and new designs are bringing that transformation forward. By furthering the growth of implant innovation, patients can get better treatment. By enhancing the surgeon and patient experience is is likely that the entire orthopedics implant market will grow more rapidly than it would otherwise."

The aging US population has supported demand, since the occurrence of health issues that require medical devices is higher in the elderly population. Buoyed by strong demand and sales, industry profit margins have increased considerably during the past five years.

The worldwide market for Hip and knee orthopedic surgical joint replacement products is $16.7 billion anticipated to reach $33 billon by 2022. The complete report provides a comprehensive analysis including procedure numbers, units sold, market value, forecasts, as well as a detailed competitive market shares and analysis of major players' success, challenges, and strategies in each segment and sub-segment. The reports cover markets for knee and hip Implant orthopedic surgery medical specialties and sub-specialties.

Table of Contents

Knee and Hip Orthopedic Implant Market Executive Summary

  • Knee and Hip Orthopedic Implant Market Driving Forces
  • Knee and Hip Surgical Robot Market Shares
  • Knee and Hip Surgical Implant Forecasts

1. Knee and Hip Orthopedic Implants Market Description and Market Dynamics

  • 1.1 Challenges In The Field Of Healthcare
    • 1.1.1 Clinical Limited Financial Resources
    • 1.1.2 Clinical Economic Efficiency
    • 1.1.3 Reducing Fixed Costs Homogeneous Supplier Structure Optimizing Processes
  • 1.2 Orthopedic Reconstructive Implants
  • 1.3 Continuing Education
    • 1.3.1 Implant Industry Characterized by Frequent Patent Litigation
    • 1.3.2 Primary Customers
  • 1.4 Knee Orthopaedic Reconstructive Implants
    • 1.4.1 Knee Replacement
  • 1.5 Hip Implants
    • 1.5.1 Hip Replacement

2. Knee and Hip Orthopedic Implant Market Shares and Market Forecasts

  • 2.1 Knee and Hip Orthopedic Implant Market Driving Forces
  • 2.2 Knee and Hip Surgical Robot Market Shares
    • 2.2.1 Products
    • 2.2.2 Orthopedic Implant Surgical Companies
    • 2.2.3 Zimmer Persona® Knee: The Personalized Knee System
    • 2.2.4 Zimmer Persona Knee - The Personalized Knee System
    • 2.2.5 Biomet Vanguard SSK 360 Revision System is the best-selling Biomet knee revision implant.
    • 2.2.6 Zimmer Biomet Oxford Partial Knee
    • 2.2.7 Stryker Accolade II
    • 2.2.8 Johnson and Johnson / DePuy Surgical Orthopedic Implants Segments
    • 2.2.9 Johnson and Johnson / DePuy Hip
    • 2.2.10 Smith & Nephew Surgical Orthopedic Implants Segments
    • 2.2.11 Exactech Surgical Orthopedic Implants Segments
    • 2.2.12 Exactech
    • 2.2.13 Mathys Surgical Orthopedic Implants Segments,
    • 2.2.14 DJO
    • 2.2.15 ConforMIS
    • 2.2.16 Aesculap Bicontact® Universal Hip System
    • 2.2.17 Wright Medical Technology
    • 2.2.18 Wright Medical Technology
    • 2.2.19 Total Hip Replacement
    • 2.2.20 Total Hip Replacement Leaching Metal Debris Causes A Condition Called Metallosis
    • 2.2.21 Total Knee Replacement
    • 2.2.22 Other Surgical Orthopedic Implant Segments
  • 2.3 Knee and Hip Surgical Implant Forecasts
    • 2.3.1 Knee Implants Market Forecasts
    • 2.3.2 Hip Implant Market Forecasts
    • 2.3.3 Knee and Hip Surgical Implant Unit Analysis
  • 2.4 Knee and Hip Orthopedic Surgical Procedure Analysis
  • 2.5 Knee and Hip Surgical Robot Regional Analysis
    • 2.5.1 Orthopedic Implant Regional Positioning
    • 2.5.2 Zimmer Americas
    • 2.5.3 Zimmer Europe
    • 2.5.4 Charité Europe
    • 2.5.5 European Reconstructive Implant And Trauma Product Markets
    • 2.5.6 Asia Pacific Market For Reconstructive Implant And Trauma Products
    • 2.5.7 Asia Pacific.
    • 2.5.8 Zimmer Local Distribution Facilities

3. Knee and Hip Surgical Robot Products

  • 3.1 Zimmer Holdings / Biomet Hip
    • 3.1.1 Zimmer Fitmore® Hip Stem
    • 3.1.2 Zimmer Continuum® Acetabular system
    • 3.1.3 Zimmer Facing Lawsuits over Durom Acetabular Component
    • 3.1.4 Zimmer Holdings / Biomet Knee
    • 3.1.5 Zimmer / Biomet Knee and Hip
    • 3.1.6 Biomet Knee reconstructive products
    • 3.1.7 Biomet Oxford Partial Knee
  • 3.2 Smith & Nephew
    • 3.2.1 Smith & Nephew Orthopaedic Product Line
    • 3.2.2 Smith & Nephew Hip
    • 3.2.3 Smith & Nephew Recall of Metal Liner Component Of Its Modular R3
    • 3.2.4 Smith & Nephew Redapt Hip Implant
    • 3.2.5 Smith & Nephew Knee
    • 3.2.6 Smith & Nephew Knee Implant Systems
    • 3.2.7 Smith & Nephew LEGION HK Hinge Knee Replacement
  • 3.3 Johnson and Johnson / DePuy Hip
    • 3.3.1 DePuy's ASR XL Acetabular Total Hip Replacement System Recalled
    • 3.3.2 DePuy ATTUNE® Knee System
    • 3.3.3 DePuy GLIDERIGHT™ Articulation Knee Implant
    • 3.3.4 DePuy AOX™ Polyethylene
    • 3.3.5 DePuy ORTHOVISC® Knee Injections
  • 3.4 Stryker
    • 3.4.1 Stryker Triathlon Total Knee Implants
    • 3.4.2 Stryker MAKOplasty ® Robotic Arm Hip Replacement Solution
    • 3.4.3 Stryker MAKOplasty® Surgical Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty
    • 3.4.4 Stryker MAKO Surgical Knee Replacements
    • 3.4.5 Stryker's Mako Total Knee Application Receives FDA Clearance
    • 3.4.6 Stryker Knee and Hip Surgical Robot Products Benefits
    • 3.4.7 Stryker / Mako
    • 3.4.8 Stryker® Knee Replacement System
  • 3.5 Microport Profemur™ Z Hip Stem System
    • 3.5.1 MicroPort Evolution Knee
    • 3.5.2 MicroPort Orthopedics Knee Replacement
    • 3.5.3 MicroPort Orthopedic Devices
  • 3.6 Corin
  • 3.7 DJO Hip
    • 3.7.1 DJO Revelation Hip System
    • 3.7.2 DJO Revelation microMAX Hip
    • 3.7.3 DJO Linear Hip System
    • 3.7.4 DOJ LMR Hip
    • 3.7.5 DJO 3DKnee™ System
    • 3.7.6 DJO 3DKnee System
    • 3.7.7 DJO FMP Acetabular System
    • 3.7.8 DJO RSP Monoblock
    • 3.7.9 DJO Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis (RSP)
    • 3.7.10 DJO Turon Modular Shoulder System
    • 3.7.11 DJO e-plus
  • 3.8 Exactech
    • 3.8.1 Exactech Knee
  • 3.9 ConforMIS
    • 3.9.1 ConforMIS iTotal CR Mimics Natural Shape Of The Knee
    • 3.9.2 ConforMIS in Development of the iTotal Hip
  • 3.10 Medacta
  • 3.11 B. Braun / Aesculap AG
    • 3.11.1 Aesculap Hip Arthroplasty Low Abrasion Ceramic Articulation And Bioactive Surface Coatings
    • 3.11.2 Aesculap Bicontact® Universal Hip System
    • 3.11.3 Aesculap Knee Arthroplasty
  • 3.12 Waldemar LINK GmbH & Co.
    • 3.12.1 LINK® Hip Prostheses
  • 3.13 Mathys AG
    • 3.13.1 Mathys Stem
    • 3.13.2 Mathys Cup
    • 3.13.3 Mathys Hip Head
    • 3.13.4 Mathys Knee Portfolio
    • 3.13.5 Mathys Shoulder Portfolio
  • 3.14 Wright Medical Technology

4. Knee and Hip Surgical Research, Technology, and Regulation

  • 4.1 Cemented / Cement-Free Implants
    • 4.1.1 Cement-Free Anchorage
    • 4.1.2 Cemented Anchorage
  • 4.2 Well Described Problem For Hip Replacements
    • 4.2.1 Allergy Considerations
    • 4.2.2 Smith-Nephew VERILAST♦ Technology for Knees
    • 4.2.3 Smith & Nephew VERILAST Technology May Last Up To 30 Years Of Wear 234
  • 4.3 Hip Implant Failure
    • 4.3.1 Epidemic Of Failures Of Hip Implant Devices
    • 4.3.2 Implants Involved In These Lawsuits
  • 4.4 Regulation
    • 4.4.1 U.S. Food and Drug Administration
    • U.S. Food and Drug Administration Regulatory
    • 4.4.2 FDA's Premarket Clearance and Approval Requirements
    • 4.4.3 510(k) Clearance Pathway
    • 4.4.4 Premarket Approval Pathway
    • 4.4.5 Clinical Trials
    • 4.4.6 Pervasive and Continuing FDA Regulation

5. Knee and Hip Surgical Company Descriptions

  • 5.1 B Braun / Aesculap
    • 5.1.1 B. Braun Products
    • 5.1.2 B.Braun
    • 5.1.3 Braun / Aesculap Revenue
    • 5.1.4 Aesculap Hip Arthroplasty
    • 5.1.5 Aesculap Knee Arthroplasty
  • 5.2 ConforMIS
    • 5.2.1 ConforMIS Fully Paid Up, Worldwide License Agreement with Wright Medical Group,
    • 5.2.2 ConforMIS iTotal PS Knee Replacement Product Systems Voluntary Recall 251
    • 5.2.3 ConforMIS Makes The Implant Fit The Patient
    • 5.2.4 ConforMIS Revenue Third Quarter 2015
    • 5.2.5 ConforMIS Third Quarter 2015 Financial Results
  • 5.3 DJO
    • 5.3.1 DJO Trademarks, Service Marks And Brand Names
    • 5.3.2 DJO Linear® Hip System
    • 5.3.3 DJO TaperFill™ Hip System
    • 5.3.4 DJO Revelation® microMAX™ Hip
    • 5.3.5 DJO Knee
    • 5.3.6 DJO e+™
    • 5.3.7 DJO Movation™ and S.U.R.E. System™
    • 5.3.8 DJO Surgical
    • 5.3.9 DJO purchases the Biomet Cobalt™ HV Bone Cement and Optivac© Cement Mixing from Zimmer Biomet
    • 5.3.10 DJO Advanced Technologies
    • 5.3.11 DJO Revenue
    • 5.3.12 DJO Sales by Business Segment
  • 5.4 Exactech
  • 5.5 Johnson and Johnson / Depuy
    • 5.5.1 Depuy Synthes Trauma Launches New Biologic Implant
    • 5.5.2 DePuy Synthes Companies of Johnson & Johnson
    • 5.5.3 J&J DePuy Synthes
    • 5.5.4 DePuy Synthes ASR Hips Failed Solutions In The Specialties Of Joint Reconstruction, Trauma
    • 5.5.5 Johnson and Johnson / DePuy Synthes
    • 5.1.1 Google Collaborating With Johnson & Johnson To Develop Surgical Robots
    • 5.1.2 DePuy
    • 5.1.3 Johnson & Johnson
    • 5.1.4 Johnson & Johnson / Ethicon
    • 5.5.6 Johnson & Johnson Business
    • 5.5.7 Johnson & Johnson Geographic Areas
  • 5.6 Corin
    • 5.6.1 Corin Hip Components
    • 5.6.2 Corin Knee Components
  • 5.7 Mathys
  • 5.8 Medacta
    • 5.8.1 Medacta Business
  • 5.9 MicroPort Scientific Corporation
    • 5.9.1 MicroPort Orthopedic Devices
    • 5.9.2 MicroPort acquires OrthoRecon Business from Wright Medical Technologies 287
    • 5.9.3 Microport Hip Systems
  • 5.10 Shenzhen Advanced Institute Spinal Surgical Robot
  • 5.11 Smith & Nephew
    • 5.11.1 Smith & Nephew Revenue
    • 5.11.2 Smith & Nephew 2015 Q3 Highlights
  • 5.12 Stryker Corporation
    • 5.12.1 Stryker Revenue
    • 5.12.2 Stryker Results Of Operations
    • 5.12.3 Stryker Segment Orthopaedics
    • 5.12.4 Stryker Business Segment Operations
    • 5.12.5 Stryker Revenue
    • 5.12.6 Stryker Hip Recall: $1.4 Billion Settlement
    • 5.12.7 Stryker Regional Revenue Segment
    • 5.12.8 Stryker Robots
    • 5.12.9 Stryker / MAKO Surgical
    • 5.12.10 Stryker / Mako
    • 5.12.11 MAKO Surgical RIO Robotic Arm
    • 5.12.12 Stryker Endoscopy
    • 5.12.13 Mako Surgical Business
    • 5.12.14 Mako Products
    • 5.12.15 Mako Surgical Strategy
    • 5.12.16 Mako Surgical Revenue
  • 5.13 THINK Surgical
    • 5.13.1 THINK Surgical TPLAN™ 3D Planning Workstation
    • 5.13.2 THINK Surgical TCAT™ Computer Assisted Tool
    • 5.13.3 Think Surgical
    • 5.13.4 Think Surgical Robodoc
  • 5.14 Waldemar LINK GmbH & Co.
    • 5.14.1 Waldemar Link GmbH und Co. KG
  • 5.15 Wright Medical Technology
    • 5.15.1 Wright Revenue
    • 5.15.2 Wright Medical Group NV Revenue
    • 5.15.3 Wright Medical Group N.V. Revenue for 2015 Third Quarter
    • 5.15.4 Wright / Tornier
  • 5.16 Zimmer Biomet
    • 5.16.1 Zimmer Biomet Sales by Product Category
    • 5.16.2 Zimmer Biomet
    • 5.16.3 Zimmer Metal-on-Metal Hip Recall

List of Tables and Figures

  • Figure ES-1 Knee and Hip Orthopedic Implant Market Driving Forces
  • Figure ES-2 Knee and Hip Orthopedic Implant Market Aspects
  • Table ES-3 Knee and Hip Orthopedic Implant Market Challenges
  • Table ES-4 Innovative Knee and Hip Orthopedic Implant Features
  • Figure ES-5 Hip and Knee Surgical Orthopedic Implants Market Shares, Shipments, Dollars, Worldwide 2015
  • Figure ES-6 Orthopedic Implants Market Forecasts, Dollars, Worldwide, 2016-2022
  • Table 1-1 Clinical Economic Efficiency
  • Figure 1-2 Knee Replacement Operation Resurfaces The Damaged Knee Joint With Metal And Plastic Implants To Restore Movement
  • Table 1-3 Hip Implant Surgeon Implant Decision Process Metrics
  • Table 1-4 Hip Implant Surgery Challenges
  • Table 1-5 Hip Implant Surgery Difficulties
  • Figure 1-6 Orthopedic Hip Implant Instrumentation
  • Figure 2-1 Knee and Hip Orthopedic Implant Market Driving Forces
  • Figure 2-2 Knee and Hip Orthopedic Implant Market Aspects
  • Table 2-3 Knee and Hip Orthopedic Implant Market Challenges
  • Table 2-4 Innovative Knee and Hip Orthopedic Implant Features
  • Figure 2-5 Hip and Knee Surgical Orthopedic Implants Market Shares, Shipments, Dollars, Worldwide 2015
  • Table 2-6 Hip and Knee Surgical Orthopedic Implants Markets and Systems Shares, Dollars, Worldwide, 2015
  • Figure 2-7 Zimmer Biomet Knee
  • Figure 2-8 Zimmer Persona Knee
  • Table 2-9 Zimmer Surgical Orthopedic Implants Segments, Dollars, Worldwide, 2015
  • Table 2-10 Stryker Surgical Orthopedic Implants Segments, Dollars, Worldwide, 2015
  • Table 2-11 Johnson and Johnson DePuy Surgical Orthopedic Implants Segments, Dollars, Worldwide, 2015
  • Figure 2-12 Johnson and Johnson / Depuy Hip Implants
  • Table 2-13 Smith & Nephew Surgical Orthopedic Implants Segments, Dollars, Worldwide, 2015 66
  • Table 2-14 Exactech Surgical Orthopedic Implants Segments, Dollars, Worldwide, 2015
  • Figure 2-15 Exactech Knee Implant Images
  • Table 2-16 Mathys Surgical Orthopedic Implants Segments, Dollars, Worldwide, 2015
  • Table 2-17 DJO Surgical Orthopedic Implants Segments, Dollars, Worldwide, 2015
  • Figure 2-18 DJO Hip Implant
  • Table 2-19 ConforMIS Surgical Orthopedic Implants Segments, Dollars, Worldwide, 2015
  • Table 2-20 Wright Medical Technology Persona Knee features
  • Table 2-21 Total Knee Replacement Leading Causes Of Dissatisfaction
  • Table 2-22 Other Surgical Orthopedic Implant Segments, Dollars, Worldwide, 2015
  • Figure 2-23 Orthopedic Implants Market Forecasts, Dollars, Worldwide, 2016-2022
  • Table 2-24 Total Orthopedic Surgical Implant Market Segment Forecasts Dollars, Worldwide, 2016-2022
  • Table 2-25 Surgical Orthopedic Implant Market Segments, Units and Dollars, Worldwide, 2015 80
  • Table 2-26 Hip, Knee and Other Orthopedic Surgical Implant Market Segment Forecasts, Dollars, Worldwide, 2016-2022
  • Figure 2-27 Knee Implants Market Forecasts, Dollars, Worldwide, 2016-2022
  • Table 2-28 Knee Orthopedic Surgical Implant Market Segment Forecasts, Units, Dollars, and Dollars per Unit, United States and Worldwide, 2016-2022
  • Figure 2-29 Hip Implants Market Forecasts, Dollars, Worldwide, 2016-2022
  • Table 2-30 Hip Orthopedic Surgical Implant Market Segment Forecasts, Dollars, Units, Dollars per Unit, United States and Worldwide, 2016-2022
  • Table 2-31 Surgical Orthopedic Implant Knee and Hip Market Segments, Units and Dollars, Worldwide, 2015
  • Figure 2-32 Other Implants Market Forecasts, Dollars, Worldwide, 2016-2022
  • Table 2-33 Surgical Orthopedic Implant Market Segments, Units and Dollars, Worldwide, 2015 88
  • Table 2-34 Hip, Knee, and Other Orthopedic Surgical Implant Market Segment Forecasts, Units, United States and Worldwide, 2016-2022
  • Figure 2-35 Orthopedic Surgical Implant Regional Market Segments, Dollars, Worldwide, 2015 90
  • Table 2-36 Orthopedic Surgical Robot Regional Market Segments, Dollars, 2015
  • Figure 3-1 Zimmer Holdings / Biomet Hip
  • Table 3-2 Zimmer Significant Hip Brands
  • Figure 3-3 Zimmer Continuum™ Acetabular System
  • Figure 3-4 Zimmer Continuum™ Acetabular Orthopedic Implant Hip System
  • Figure 3-5 Zimmer Continuum™ Acetabular System Meets Individual Patient Needs
  • Table 3-6 Zimmer Continuum™ Acetabular System Features
  • Table 3-7 Zimmer Trabecular Metal Material Characteristics
  • Table 3-8 Zimmer Significant Knee Brands:
  • Figure 3-9 Zimmer Holdings / Biomet Knee
  • Table 3-10 Zimmer Personalized Total Knee Arthroplasty System Functions
  • Figure 3-11 Zimmer Holdings / Biomet Knee Components
  • Figure 3-12 Zimmer Holdings / Biomet Implantable Knee Component Unlock and Pull
  • Table 3-13 Biomet Key Products Description
  • Table 3-14 Biomet Knee Reconstructive Products
  • Figure 3-15 Smith & Nephew Product Line
  • Table 3-16 Smith & Nephew REFLECTION™ Ceramic Acetabular Hip Features
  • Figure 3-17 Smith & Nephew REFLECTION™ Ceramic Acetabular Hip System
  • Figure 3-18 Smith-nephew Reflection Ceramic Acetabular Hip System Optimized Neck
  • Figure 3-19 Smith & Nephew Hip Implant
  • Figure 3-20 Smith & Nephew Hip Implant CLose-up Smith & Nephew Redapt Hip Implant
  • Figure 3-22 Smith & Nephew Journey BCS Knee Implant
  • Figure 3-23 Smith & Nephew Legion TKS Total Knee System
  • Figure 3-24 Johnson and Johnson / Depuy Hip Implants
  • Table 3-25 Johnson & Johnson DePuy ASR & Pinnacle Hip Replacement Orthopedics Features
  • Figure 3-26 DePuy ATTUNE® Knee Implant System Works With Knee Muscles And Ligaments
  • Figure 3-27 DePuy ATTUNE Knee
  • Figure 3-28 DePuy ATTUNE Knee Side View
  • Figure 3-29 Innovative Technology of the DePuy ATTUNE Knee
  • Figure 3-30 Anika Therapeutics Hyaluronic Acid Knee Injections
  • Figure 3-31 Stryker Implant Products
  • Table 3-32 Stryker Mobile Bearing Hip System Stability and Longevity Features
  • Table 3-33 Stryker Mobile Bearing Hip System Advanced Fixation Features
  • Table 3-34 Stryker ADM X3 and WDM X3 Hip System
  • Figure 3-35 Stryker Triathlon Total Knee
  • Figure 3-36 Stryker Mako Advanced RIO® Robotic Arm
  • Figure 3-37 Stryker MAKOplasty ® Robotic Arm Solution
  • Figure 3-38 Stryker MAKOplasty Hip Arthroplasty
  • Figure 3-39 Stryker MAKOplasty Hip Arthroplasty
  • Table 3-40 Stryker MAKOplasty® Surgical Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty Features
  • Figure 3-41 Stryker Hip Joint Kinematics
  • Figure 3-42 Stryker RIO Robotic Arm Interactive Orthopedic System
  • Figure 3-43 Stryker MAKOplasty
  • Figure 3-44 Stryker Mako RESTORIS Hip System Components
  • Table 3-45 Stryker Mako Diverse Family of RESTORIS® Hip Implant Systems
  • Figure 3-46 MAKO Surgical Maker Of Robots To Assist In Knee Replacements
  • Figure 3-47 Stryker Mako Robotic Stations for Surgery Planning and Bone Cutting
  • Figure 3-48 Stryker Knee and Hip Surgical Robot For Bone Cutting
  • Figure 3-49 Stryker Knee Surgical Robot Precision Cutter Decreases Need For Bone Resurfacing
  • Figure 3-50 Stryker Mako Surgical Preoperative and Post Operative Knee Surgery Images
  • Table 3-51 Stryker Mako Surgical Robot Knee Arthroplasty Benefits
  • Figure 3-52 Microport Profemur™ Z Hip Stem System
  • Figure 3-53 MicroPort Orthopedics Knee Replacement
  • Table 3-54 MicroPort Implant Medical Conditions Treated:
  • Table 3-55 MicroPort Medical Solutions:
  • Figure 3-56 MicroPort Hips and Knees
  • Figure 3-57 MicroPort Knees
  • Figure 3-58 MicroPort Evolution™ Medial-Pivot Knee System
  • Table 3-59 MicroPort e MP Knee System Flexion Stability Features
  • Figure 3-60 Corin Hip Product Line
  • Figure 3-61 Corin Product Line
  • Table 3-62 Early Intervention and Primary Hip Implants
  • Figure 3-63 DJO Hip Implant
  • Figure 3-64 DJO Revelation® Lateral Flare® Total Hip
  • Figure 3-65 DJO Revelation microMAX Hip
  • Figure 3-66 DJO Linear Hip System
  • Figure 3-67 DOJ LMR Hip
  • Figure 3-68 DJO 3DKnee™ System
  • Figure 3-69 DJO 3DKnee™ System
  • Table 3-70 DJO EMPOWR 3D Knee™ System: Key design Features
  • Figure 3-71 DJO Foundation Knee System
  • Figure 3-72 Exactech Knee Implant Images
  • Figure 3-73 Exactech Knee Implant
  • Figure 3-74 Exactech Knee System
  • Figure 3-75 ConforMIS iTotal Customized Knee Replacement
  • Figure 3-76 ConforMIS iTotal CR Mimics Natural Shape Of The Knee
  • Table 3-77 ConforMIS iFit Technology Platform Key Elements Source: WinterGreen Research, Inc.
  • Figure 3-78 ConforMIS iTotal Hip
  • Figure 3-79 B. Braun / Aesculap Bicontact® System Implant Components
  • Figure 3-80 B. Braun / Aesculap Implant System Components
  • Figure 3-81 Aesculap Knee Arthroplasty Components
  • Table 3-82 Link Target Product Markets
  • Figure 3-83 LINK Prosthesis Standard Stems
  • Figure 3-84 Link Primary Instrumentation
  • Figure 3-85 Link Cementless And Cemented Hip Stems And Hip Cups For Revision Surgery
  • Figure 3-86 Link Prosthesis Heads
  • Figure 3-87 Mathys AG Primary Hip Modules
  • Figure 3-88 Mathys AG Primary Hip Monobloc and Bipolar / Hemi Modules
  • Figure 3-89 Mathys AG Primary Cemented and Uncemented Hip Modules
  • Figure 3-90 Mathys AG Primary Hip Revision Modules
  • Table 3-91 Mathys AG Hip Implant Stems That Are Anchored Cement-Free
  • Figure 3-92 Mathys AG Hip Implant Stems
  • Figure 3-93 Mathys Modular Cups Can Be Implanted With Cement-Free Or Cemented Anchorage
  • Figure 3-94 Mathys Ceramic Hip Heads
  • Figure 3-95 Mathys Knee Portfolio
  • Figure 3-96 Mathys Uni Knee and Revision Knee
  • Figure 3-97 Mathys Shoulder Portfolio
  • Figure 4-1 Smith & Nephew Hip Stem For Cement-Free (Left) And Cemented (Right) Anchorage
  • Figure 4-2 Smith & Nephew Metal Content of Implants
  • Table 4-3 U.S. Food and Drug Administration Regulatory Governance Of Activities
  • Table 4-4 Continuing FDA Regulation
  • Table 5-1 B. Braun Products
  • Table 5-2 B. Braun Product Descriptions
  • Figure 5-3 DJO Hip, Knee, Upper Extremity, and Cement Solutions
  • Figure 5-4 DJO Linear® Hip System
  • Figure 5-5 DJO TaperFill™ Hip System
  • Figure 5-6 DJO Empowr 3D Knee™
  • Figure 5-7 DJO e+™
  • Figure 5-8 Movation™ and S.U.R.E. System™
  • Figure 5-9 DJO Provides ArmorCoat Implant Protection For Maximum Performance
  • Figure 5-10 Johnson and Johnson / Depuy Hip Implants
  • Figure 5-11 Depuy Synthes Biologic Implant
  • Table 5-12 Johnson and Johnson Family of Companies Comprises:
  • Table 5-13 Johnson & Johnson Business
  • Figure 5-14 Corin Orthopaedic Hip Implant
  • Figure 5-15 Corin Knee Components
  • Figure 5-16 Mathys Worldwide Presence
  • Table 5-17 MicroPort® Advanced Technology Product Segments Addressed
  • Table 5-18 Microport Hip Systems
  • Figure 5-19 Smith & Nephew Laser Surgical Instrument
  • Figure 5-20 Stryker Joint Implants
  • Figure 5-21 Stryker Patient Specific Pre-Operative Planning
  • Figure 5-22 Stryker Patient Specific Pre-Operative Planning
  • Table 5-23 Stryker Better Fit Orthopedics
  • Table 5-24 Stryker Osteoarthritis Affects Compartments Of The Knee
  • Figure 5-25 Stryker / MAKO Surgical RIO Robotic Arm Interactive System
  • Figure 5-26 MAKO Surgical Restoris
  • Figure 5-27 Mako Robotic Arm Technology Assists in Total Hip Replacement
  • Figure 5-28 MAKO Surgical
  • Figure 5-29 MAKO Surgical Implants
  • Table 5-30 MAKO Robotic Surgery Benefits
  • Figure 5-31 THINK Surgical TPLAN™ 3D Planning Workstation
  • Figure 5-32 THINK Surgical TPLAN™ Workstation
  • Figure 5-33 THINK Surgical TCAT™ Computer Assisted Tool
  • Figure 5-34 Think Surgical Planning
  • Figure 5-35 Think Surgical Robodoc
  • Figure 5-36 LINK Prosthetic Stems Precision Turning
  • Figure 5-37 Link Baking Ceramic Molds at VACUCAST
  • Table 5-38 Zimmer Biomet Musculoskeletal Healthcare Offerings
  • Table 5-39 Zimmer Metal On Metal Hip Replacement Difficulties and Side Effects.
Back to Top