表紙
市場調査レポート

プロパント:北米の産業・市場・見通し

Proppants: North America Industry, Markets and Outlook - 1st Edition

発行 Roskill Information Services 商品コード 340905
出版日 ページ情報 英文 121 Pages; 58 Tables and 24 Figures
納期: 即日から翌営業日
価格
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=106.02円で換算しております。
Back to Top
プロパント:北米の産業・市場・見通し Proppants: North America Industry, Markets and Outlook - 1st Edition
出版日: 2015年09月19日 ページ情報: 英文 121 Pages; 58 Tables and 24 Figures
概要

当レポートでは、北米のプロパントについて調査分析し、概要、技術・仕様・資源、採鉱と加工、生産、需要予測、価格予測など、体系的な情報を提供しています。

第1章 サマリー

第2章 技術・仕様・資源

  • 水圧破砕の発展
  • 最先端の水圧破砕
  • プロパントの仕様
  • 資源

第3章 採鉱と加工

  • 発展
  • 採鉱と加工

第4章 北米の砂状プロパントの生産

  • 米国の天然砂状プロパント
  • 米国のプロパントサンド (砂) の開発と生産:州別
  • 米国の主要なフラックサンド (破砕砂) 生産企業
  • 樹脂コーティングした砂状プロパント
  • カナダのプロパントサンド (砂) の生産と開発
  • カナダの開発中のプロジェクト
  • カナダにおける砂状プロパントの消費

第5章 セラミックプロパント:国別、企業別

  • イントロダクション
  • 北米市場へのセラミックプロパントの供給
  • 米国のセラミックプロパント生産業者
  • 国際的なセラミックプロパント生産業者
  • 北米におけるセラミックプロパントの販売業者

第6章 プロパントの需要予測

  • イントロダクション

第7章 価格と価格予測

  • 天然プロパントサンド (砂) の価格
  • 樹脂コーティングした砂状プロパントの価格と予測
  • セラミックプロパントの価格と予測

図表

目次
Product Code: ISBN 978 0 86214 624 5

The hectic pace of shale hydrocarbon exploitation in the US and Canada within the last 10 years has reversed the decline in exploitable oil and gas reserves and pushed so-called peak oil and gas) decades into the future. The key to unlocking vast shale oil and gas resources so quickly in North America, was the explosive expansion in output of hydraulic fracturing proppants, particularly natural frac sand.

The tempo of development is unprecedented in the mineral extractive industry. Industrial sand production in the US had reached a 30 year plateau of 20-25Mtpy by 1970 with frac sand for conventional oil and gas wells accounting for 1% of its usage. Since, a 200-fold increase in frac sand volume has occurred, and most of it since 2002. By the end of 2014, natural frac sand accounted for over two thirds of the US 75Mtpy production of industrial sand.

In the USA, 66 sand proppant companies operated 118 mines in 15 states. The top seven states producing more than 90% of 2014 output were, in order of rank, Wisconsin, Illinois, Texas, Minnesota, Arkansas, Oklahoma and Missouri. The top 12 companies, each producing over 1Msht in 2014, accounted for 72% of US production. The report examines North American production in detail, including projects and closures to give an up-to date picture of the industry. Aspects such as specifications, estimated volumes and logistical information are included.

Ceramic proppants are produced domestically in the USA, and also imported, mainly from China, but also other countries. This report reviews domestic and overseas production of ceramic proppants and their current status.

The North American petroleum industry and its suppliers were taken by surprise by a drop in oil prices from $105/bbl in June 2014 to below $45/bbl by the end of January, 2015 (a quantum drop in natural gas prices also occurred). Petroleum companies reacted quickly, the number of drilling rigs operating halving by May 2015.

Novel analysis techniques have been developed by Roskill to forecast the variable decline in demand and prices for the three proppant types and their expected recovery periods and future prices. The results of which are included in this latest report.

Table of Contents

1. Summary

2. Technology, specifications and resources

  • 2.1. Hydraulic fracturing development
  • 2.2. The modern art of fracking
  • 2.3. Specifications for proppants
  • 2.4. Resources

3. Mining and processing

  • 3.1. Development
  • 3.2. Mining and processing

4. North American sand proppant production

  • 4.1. US natural sand proppants
  • 4.2. US proppant sand development and production by state
    • 4.2.1. Wisconsin
    • 4.2.2. Illinois
    • 4.2.3. Texas
    • 4.2.4. Minnesota
    • 4.2.5. Oklahoma
    • 4.2.6. Missouri
    • 4.2.7. Arkansas
    • 4.2.8. Iowa, Ohio, Nebraska, and Arizona
    • 4.2.9. Other states
  • 4.3. Major US frac sand production companies
    • 4.3.1. Unimin Corporation
      • 4.3.1.1. Operations and logistics
      • 4.3.1.2. Products and specifications
    • 4.3.2. US Silica Holdings, (US Silica)
      • 4.3.2.1. Operations and logistics
      • 4.3.2.2. Products and specifications
    • 4.3.3. Preferred Sands, LLC
      • 4.3.3.1. Operations and logistics
      • 4.3.3.2. Products and specifications
    • 4.3.4. Superior Silica Sands, LLC
      • 4.3.4.1. Operations and logistics
      • 4.3.4.2. Products and specifications
    • 4.3.5. Hi-Crush Partners/Hi-Crush Proppants, LLC
      • 4.3.5.1. Operations and logistics
      • 4.3.5.2. Products and specifications
    • 4.3.6. Fairmount Santrol Inc.
      • 4.3.6.1. Operations and logistics
      • 4.3.6.2. Products and specifications
    • 4.3.7. Badger Mining Corporation
      • 4.3.7.1. Operations and logistics
      • 4.3.7.2. Products and specifications
    • 4.3.8. Source Energy Services LP
      • 4.3.8.1. Operations and logistics
      • 4.3.8.2. Products and specifications
    • 4.3.9. EOG Resources, Inc.
      • 4.3.9.1. Operations and logistics
      • 4.3.9.2. Products and specifications
    • 4.3.10. Mississippi Sand, LLC
      • 4.3.10.1. Operations and logistics
      • 4.3.10.2. Products and specifications
    • 4.3.11. Premier Silica, LLC
      • 4.3.11.1. Pattison Sand Company
  • 4.4. Resin coated sand proppants (RCS)
  • 4.5. Canadian proppant sand production and development
    • 4.5.1. Canadian Silica Industries (CSI)
    • 4.5.2. Sil Industrial Minerals, Inc
    • 4.5.3. Peaskie Minerals, Inc
    • 4.5.4. Preferred Sands, Ltd
    • 4.5.5. CanFrac Sands, Ltd
  • 4.6. Canadian projects under development
    • 4.6.1. Claim Post Resources Inc
    • 4.6.2. Victory Silica, Ltd
    • 4.6.3. Athabasca Minerals, Inc
    • 4.6.4. Heemskirk Canada Limited
    • 4.6.5. Proppant sand shipments from the USA to Canada
    • 4.6.6. US Silica
    • 4.6.7. Superior Silica Sands
    • 4.6.8. Fairmount Santrol Inc.
    • 4.6.9. Badger Mining Corporation
    • 4.6.10. Source Energy Services
  • 4.7. Consumption of sand proppants in Canada

5. Ceramic proppants by country and company

  • 5.1. Introduction
  • 5.2. Ceramic proppant supply to North American markets
  • 5.3. USA ceramic proppants producers
    • 5.3.1. Carbo Ceramics
    • 5.3.2. Saint-Gobain Proppants
    • 5.3.3. Imerys Oilfield Solutions
    • 5.3.4. Oxane Materials, Inc
    • 5.3.5. Shamrock Proppants, LLC
    • 5.3.6. Coors Tek, Inc
  • 5.4. International producers of ceramic proppants
    • 5.4.1. Chinese producers
    • 5.4.2. Mineração Curimbaba, Ltda
    • 5.4.3. Mineração Varginha Ltda
    • 5.4.4. JSC Borovichi Refractory Plant
    • 5.4.5. Fores, Ltd.
    • 5.4.6. Hallmark (I) Pvt. Limited
    • 5.4.7. Baltic Ceramics Investments
    • 5.4.8. Imerys Oilfield Solutions
  • 5.5. Distributors of ceramic proppants in North America

6. Forecast demand for proppants

  • 6.1. Introduction
    • 6.1.1. Drilling technology and proppant demand factors
    • 6.1.2. USA oil and gas production, prices and forecast
    • 6.1.3. North American proppant sand forecast
    • 6.1.4. Resin coated sand forecast
    • 6.1.5. Ceramic proppants forecast

7. Prices and price forecasts

  • 7.1. Natural proppant sand prices
    • 7.1.1. Proppant sand price forecast
  • 7.2. Resin coated sand proppant prices and forecast
  • 7.3. Ceramic proppant prices and forecast

List of Tables

  • Table 1: Standard proppant sizes
  • Table 2: Crushing strength testing
  • Table 3: US: Production of natural proppant sands, 1950 to 2014
  • Table 4: Wisconsin: Mine/plant proppant sands operations by county, 2014
  • Table 5: Illinois: Mine/plant proppant sands oeprations by country, 2014
  • Table 6: Texas: Mine/plant proppant sands operations by county 2014
  • Table 7: Minnesota: Mine/plant proppant sands operations by county
  • Table 8: Oklahoma: Mine/plant proppant sands operations by county 2014
  • Table 9: Missouri: Mine/plant proppant sands operations by county, 2014
  • Table 10:Arkansas: Mine/plant proppant sands operations by county
  • Table 11: Iowa, Ohio Nebraska & Arizona: Mine/plant proppant sands by county
  • Table 12: US proppant production by state: 2013 to 2014
  • Table 13: US: Top frac sand producers 2014 capacities and production
  • Table 14: Unimin Corp: North American proppant sand plants
  • Table 15: Unimin Corp: Product specifications
  • Table 16: US Silica: North American proppant sand plants
  • Table 17: US Silica: North American transload terminals
  • Table 18: US Silica: Product specifications
  • Table 19: Preferred Sands: North American proppant sand plants
  • Table 20: Preferred Sands: Product specifications
  • Table 21: Superior Silica Sands: North American proppant sand plants
  • Table 22: Superior Silica Sands: North American transload terminals
  • Table 23: Superior Silica Sands: Product specifications (typical)
  • Table 24: Hi-Crush ‘Partners' and ‘Proppants': North American proppant sand plants
  • Table 25: Hi-Crush: North American transload terminals
  • Table 26: Fairmount Santrol: North American proppant sand plants
  • Table 27: Fairmount Santrol: Proppant sand specifications
  • Table 28: Badger Mining Corp/Atlas Proppants: North American transload terminals
  • Table 29: Badger Mining Corp: Product specifications
  • Table 30: Source Energy Services: North American transload terminals
  • Table 31: EOG Resources: North American proppant sand plants
  • Table 32: Mississippi Sand: North American proppant sand plants
  • Table 33: Mississippi Sand: North American transload terminal
  • Table 34: Mississippi Sand: Product specifications
  • Table 35: Premier Silica: North American proppant sand plants
  • Table 36: Premier Silica: Product specifications
  • Table 37: Resin coated sand proppant producers, plants and capacities
  • Table 38: Canadian proppant sand capacity and production, 2014
  • Table 39: Imports of US proppant sand into Canada, 2014
  • Table 40: World ceramic proppants capacity year end 2014
  • Table 41: Ceramic proppant supply to the North American market, 2013 and 2014
  • Table 42: Carbo Ceramics: Capacity of ceramic proppant plants, 2015
  • Table 43: Carbo Ceramics proppant specifications (typical)
  • Table 44: Saint-Gobain Proppants: Capacity of ceramic proppant plants, 2015
  • Table 45: Saint-Gobain proppant specifications (typical)
  • Table 46: Imerys Oilfield Solutions: Capacity of ceramic proppant plants, 2015
  • Table 47: Imerys Oilfield Solutions proppant specifications (typical)
  • Table 48: Coors Tek proppant specifications (typical)
  • Table 49: China ceramic proppant producers
  • Table 50: China: A selection of producers' specifications
  • Table 51: Mineração Curimbaba proppant specifications (typical)
  • Table 52: Borovichi Refractory Plant proppant specifications (typical)
  • Table 53: Fores proppant specifications (typical)
  • Table 54: Distribution of ceramic proppants in North America
  • Table 55: Recent technological developments in drilling and hydraulic fracturing
  • Table 56: USA: Well count by basin
  • Table 57: USA: Wells rig by basin
  • Table 58: USA: Frac sand average annual prices fob US$/t1, 1975 to 2014

List of Figures

  • Figure 1: USA silica sand production from 1915 and frac sand from 1970 to 2014
  • Figure 2: US frac sand prices showing relationship with the CPI trend, 1970 to 2014
  • Figure 3: Distribution of shale gas (and oil) basins in North America
  • Figure 4: Horizontal drilling and fracing
  • Figure 5: Krumbein and Sloss roundness and sphericity chart
  • Figure 6: Schematic of a typical process sheet
  • Figure 7: US production of silica sand from 1913 and frac sand from 1970 to 2014
  • Figure 8: Wisconsin hydraulic fracturing sand sources by county
  • Figure 9: Illinois hydraulic fracturing sand sources by county
  • Figure 10: Texas hydraulic fracturing sand sources by county
  • Figure 11: Minnesota hydraulic fracturing sand sources by county
  • Figure 12: Okilahoma hydraulic fracturing sand sources by county
  • Figure 13: Missouri hydraulic fracturing sand sources by county
  • Figure 14: Arkansas hydraulic fracturing sand sources by county
  • Figure 15: UNIFRAC® structural integrity
  • Figure 16: China's oil, tight oil and shale oil basins
  • Figure 17: China major shale gas basins
  • Figure 18: North America: Average quarterly rig count by type, 2000 to 2015
  • Figure 19: USA: Tight oil production - selected plays, 2000 to 2014
  • Figure 20: USA: Dry shale gas production, 2000 to 2014
  • Figure 21: Historical, forecast and CPI estimated oil prices, 1940 to 2030
  • Figure 22: Frac sand production and forecast, 2000 to 2020
  • Figure 23: Actual (unadjusted) average annual prices and CPI estimated prices, 1970 to 2014
  • Figure 24: Projected proppant sand prices, 1995 to 2020
Back to Top