Abstract
A comprehensive survey of current deployments and user behavior in 100
corporate organizations, with regards to Security, Archiving and Compliance.
The sample represented a population of 228,068 users worldwide. Survey Results
include:
- Messaging Budgets & Priorities - IT Budgets and IT Priorities.
- Security - Top Security Concerns, Type of Solution Deployed, Spam,
Viruses and Malware, IM Security, and Social Networks Security.
- Archiving - Archiving Deployments, Motivations, Preferences, and
Priorities.
- eDiscovery and DLP - Adoption Trends, Deployment, and Future Plans.
This report is intended for Organizations, Vendors, and Investors who need to understand IT directions
with regards to Security, Archiving and Compliance.
Table of Contents
SCOPE
METHODOLOGY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- SURVEY SAMPLE
- RESPONDENTS BY BUSINESS SIZE
- RESPONDENTS BY INDUSTRY
- RESPONDENTS BY JOB FUNCTION
- RESPONDENTS BY REGION
- RESPONDENTS BY AGE GROUP
CHAPTER 1.0: IT BUDGETS & PRIORITIES
- 1.1 IT BUDGETS
- 1.2 MAIN IT PRIORITIES IN 2011
CHAPTER 2.0: SECURITY
- 2.1 TOP SECURITY CONCERNS
- 2.2 TYPE OF EMAIL SECURITY SOLUTION DEPLOYED
- 2.3 SPAM
- 2.3.1 FALSE POSITIVES
- 2.3.2 PURCHASE BEHAVIOR AS A RESULT OF SPAM
- 2.3.3 CONSUMER SPAM
- 2.4 VIRUSES AND MALWARE
- 2.5 IM SECURITY
- 2.6 SOCIAL NETWORK SECURITY
- 2.6.1 MOBILE PHONE ACCESS TO COMPANY SOCIAL NETWORKS
CHAPTER 3.0: EMAIL ARCHIVING AND COMPLIANCE
- 3.1 EMAIL ARCHIVING DEPLOYMENT
- 3.1.1 EMAIL ARCHIVING SOLUTION IN USE
- 3.1.2 MAIN MOTIVATION FOR DEPLOYING EMAIL ARCHIVING
- 3.1.3 MOST IMPORTANT CRITERIA IN SELECTING AN ARCHIVING SOLUTION
- 3.1.4 MAIN ARCHIVING PRIORITY
- 3.2 EDISCOVERY DEPLOYMENT
- 3.2.1 EDISCOVERY SOLUTION IN USE
- 3.2.2 EDISCOVERY FUTURE DEPLOYMENT PLANS
- 3.3 DATA LOSS PREVENTION DEPLOYMENT
- 3.3.1 DLP SOLUTION IN USE
- 3.3.2 DLP FUTURE DEPLOYMENT PLANS
LIST OF FIGURES
- FIGURE 1: SPAM COMPARISON, 2011 VS. 2010
- FIGURE 2: RESPONDENTS BY COMPANY SIZE, 2011
- FIGURE 3: RESPONDENTS BY INDUSTRY, 2011
- FIGURE 4: RESPONDENTS BY JOB FUNCTION, 2011
- FIGURE 5: RESPONDENTS BY REGION, 2011
- FIGURE 6: RESPONDENTS BY AGE GROUP, 2011
- FIGURE 7: IT BUDGET CHANGE, 2010-2011
- FIGURE 8: MAIN IT PRIORITIES, 2011
- FIGURE 9: TOP SECURITY CONCERNS, 2011
- FIGURE 10: TYPE OF EMAIL SECURITY SOLUTION DEPLOYED, 2011
- FIGURE 11: PERCENT SPAM RECEIVED, 2011
- FIGURE 12: CHANGE IN AMOUNT OF SPAM REACHING INBOXES, 2011
- FIGURE 13: DO YOU CHECK YOUR QUARANTINE FOLDERS ON A REGULAR BASIS?, 2011
- FIGURE 14: PURCHASES AS A RESULT OF UNSOLICITED EMAIL?, 2011
- FIGURE 15: PERCENT CONSUMER SPAM RECEIVED, 2011
- FIGURE 16: CHANGE IN AMOUNT OF CONSUMER SPAM RECEIVED, 2011
- FIGURE 17: HAVE YOU PURCHASED A PRODUCT AS A RESULT OF UN-SOLICITED EMAIL?,
- FIGURE 15: HAVE YOU EXPERIENCED A VIRUS ATTACK IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS?, 2011
- FIGURE 16: HOW CONCERNED IS YOUR ORGANIZATION ABOUT IM SECURITY?, 2011
- FIGURE 17: IM SPAM, 2011
- FIGURE 18: COMPANY SOCIAL NETWORK SECURITY, 2011
- FIGURE 19: ACCESS TO COMPANY SOCIAL NETWORK FROM MOBILE PHONES, 2011
- FIGURE 20: EMAIL ARCHIVING DEPLOYMENT, 2011
- FIGURE 21: EMAIL ARCHIVING SOLUTION DEPLOYED, 2011
- FIGURE 22: MAIN MOTIVATIONS FOR DEPLOYING EMAIL ARCHIVING, 2011
- FIGURE 23: KEY FACTORS IN SELECTING AN ARCHIVING SOLUTION, 2011
- FIGURE 24: INFORMATION ARCHIVING PRIORITIES, 2011
- FIGURE 25: EDISCOVERY DEPLOYMENT, 2011
- FIGURE 26: EDISCOVERY SOLUTIONS, 2011
- FIGURE 27: EDISCOVERY FUTURE DEPLOYMENT PLANS, 2011
- FIGURE 28: DLP DEPLOYMENT, 2011
- FIGURE 29: DLP SOLUTIONS, 2011
- FIGURE 30: DLP FUTURE DEPLOYMENT PLANS, 2011
LIST OF TABLES
- TABLE 1: TOTAL COMPANIES SURVEYED, 2011
- TABLE 2: IT BUDGET CHANGE, 2010-2011
- TABLE 3: SPAM COMPARISON, 2011 VS. 2010
- TABLE 4: AVERAGE SPAM INCREASE OR DECREASE REPORTED, 2011
- TABLE 5: FALSE POSITIVE EMAILS RECEIVED PER WEEK, 2011
- TABLE 6: TIME SPENT CHECKING QUARANTINE FOLDERS, 2011
- TABLE 7: EMAIL TRAFFIC AND SPAM - CONSUMER VS. BUSINESS, 2011
- TABLE 7: AVERAGE VIRUS/MALWARE INCIDENTS AND DURATION PER MONTH, 2011
- TABLE 8: CONSUMER VIRUS ATTACKS IN THE LAST 12 MONTHS, 2011
- TABLE 9: VIRUS ATTACK COMPARISON - CONSUMER VS. BUSINESS, 2011