特集 : 国別レポートが13,000件から検索可能になりました!

特集 : 海外市場の委託調査がセミカスタムベースでお手軽にできます

株式会社グローバルインフォメーション
表紙
市場調査レポート
商品コード
923228

バイクシェアリングの世界市場 (種類別、地域別):将来展望・産業分析・成長予測 (2025年まで)

Bike Sharing Market Research Report: By Type, Geographical Outlook - Industry Analysis and Growth Forecast to 2025

出版日: | 発行: Prescient & Strategic Intelligence Private Limited | ページ情報: 英文 116 Pages | 納期: 2-3営業日

価格
価格表記: USDを日本円(税抜)に換算
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=105.58円
バイクシェアリングの世界市場 (種類別、地域別):将来展望・産業分析・成長予測 (2025年まで)
出版日: 2019年11月01日
発行: Prescient & Strategic Intelligence Private Limited
ページ情報: 英文 116 Pages
納期: 2-3営業日
  • 全表示
  • 概要
  • 図表
  • 目次
概要

世界各国で都市化が進むのに伴い、毎日の通勤需要も高まっています。特に、自宅や職場・学校からバス停・地下鉄駅などの中間地点との間の移動手段に対するニーズが高まっており、それが自転車共有サービス (バイクシェアリング) を含めたマイクロモビリティサービスの需要拡大につながっています。 世界のバイクシェアリングの市場規模は、2019~2025年に10.2%のCAGRで拡大し、2025年には50億以上に達する、と予測されています。種類別では、電動自転車の人気が拡大し、シェアも上昇しつつあります。地域別では欧州諸国が最大の市場で、今後も順調な市場成長が続くと見られています。

当レポートでは、世界のバイクシェアリング市場について分析し、サービスの概略や背景事情、市場の基本構造や主な市場促進・抑制要因、市場規模の実績値・予測値 (過去5年間・今後6年間分)、種類別・地域別の詳細動向、市場競争状態、主要企業のプロファイルなどを調査しております。

第1章 研究の背景事情

第2章 調査方法

第3章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第4章 イントロダクション

  • 市場区分の定義
    • システム別
    • 充電方式別
  • バリューチェーン分析
  • 市場のダイナミクス
    • トレンド
    • 促進要因
    • 阻害要因
    • 市場機会
  • ポーターのファイブフォース分析
  • 自転車の利用傾向:地域別

第5章 バイクシェアリングサービス:ユーザー分析

  • 年齢別
  • 男女別
  • 移動距離別
  • 目的別
  • 通勤パターン別

第6章 ビジネスモデル

  • インフラ
  • 製品/サービス
  • 顧客
  • 資金調達

第7章 世界市場の規制状況

  • 北米
    • 米国
    • カナダ
  • 欧州
    • ドイツ
    • イタリア
    • フランス
    • 英国
  • アジア太平洋地域地域
    • 中国
    • インド
    • シンガポール

第8章 世界市場:市場規模とその予測

  • 種類別
  • 地域別

第9章 北米市場:市場規模とその予測

  • タイプ別
  • 国別
  • 主要企業の市場シェア分析

第10章 欧州市場:市場規模とその予測

第11章 アジア太平洋地域:市場規模とその予測

第12章 ラテンアメリカ・中東・アフリカ (LAMEA) 市場:市場規模とその予測

第13章 グローバルな自転車シェアリング市場の競争環境

  • 主要企業とその製品/サービス:一覧
  • 主要企業の市場シェア分析
  • 主要企業の競争力の比較分析
  • 主要企業の最近の戦略展開動向
    • サービス開始
    • 事業提携
    • 投資
    • 企業合併・買収 (M&A)
    • その他

第14章 企業プロファイル

  • Motivate Inc. (Citi Bike)
  • Bond Mobility Inc. (Smide)
  • Anywheel Pte. Ltd.
  • Yulu Bikes Pvt. Ltd.
  • SMOOVE SAS (Velib)
  • DiDi Chuxing (DiDi Bike)
  • CycleHop LLC (HOPR)
  • Donkey Republic ApS (Donkey Republic)
  • Beijing Mobike Technology Co. Ltd. (Meituan Bike)
  • Nextbike GmbH (nextbike)
  • Ofo Inc. (Ofo)
  • Wheels Labs Inc.
  • G.bike
  • Youon Technology Co. Ltd. (Hellobike)
  • Neutron Holdings Inc. (Lime)
  • Social Bicycles Inc. (JUMP)
  • Bycyshare Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (Mobycy)

第15章:付録

図表

List of Tables

  • TABLE 1 ANALYSIS PERIOD OF THE STUDY
  • TABLE 2 DRIVERS FOR THE MARKET: IMPACT ANALYSIS
  • TABLE 3 RESTRAINTS FOR THE MARKET: IMPACT ANALYSIS
  • TABLE 4 BIKE SHARING REGULATIONS IN THE U.S. (JULY 2018)
  • TABLE 5 E-BIKE REGULATIONS IN CANADA
  • TABLE 6 GLOBAL BIKE SHARING MARKET, BY TYPE, $M (2017-2025)
  • TABLE 7 GLOBAL BIKE SHARING MARKET, BY REGION, $M (2017-2025)
  • TABLE 8 NORTH AMERICA BIKE SHARING MARKET, BY TYPE, $M (2017-2025)
  • TABLE 9 NORTH AMERICA BIKE SHARING MARKET, BY COUNTRY, $M (2017-2025)
  • TABLE 10 EUROPE BIKE SHARING MARKET, BY TYPE, $M (2017-2025)
  • TABLE 11 EUROPE BIKE SHARING MARKET, BY COUNTRY, $M (2017-2025)
  • TABLE 12 APAC BIKE SHARING MARKET, BY TYPE, $M (2017-2025)
  • TABLE 13 APAC BIKE SHARING MARKET, BY COUNTRY, $M (2017-2025)
  • TABLE 14 LAMEA BIKE SHARING MARKET, BY TYPE, $M (2017-2025)
  • TABLE 15 LAMEA BIKE SHARING MARKET, BY COUNTRY, $M (2017-2025)
  • TABLE 16 KEY PLAYERS AND THEIR OFFERINGS
  • TABLE 17 COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING OF KEY PLAYERS
  • TABLE 18 SERVICE LAUNCHES BY MAJOR PLAYERS
  • TABLE 19 PARTNERSHIPS BY MAJOR PLAYERS
  • TABLE 20 INVESTMENTS RECEIVED BY MAJOR PLAYERS
  • TABLE 21 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS BY MAJOR PLAYERS
  • TABLE 22 OTHER DEVELOPMENTS BY MAJOR PLAYERS
  • TABLE 23 CITI BIKE (MOTIVATE INC.) - COMPANY SNAPSHOT
  • TABLE 24 BOND MOBILITY INC. (SMIDE) - COMPANY SNAPSHOT
  • TABLE 25 ANYWHEEL PTE. LTD. - COMPANY SNAPSHOT
  • TABLE 26 YULU BIKES PVT. LTD. - COMPANY SNAPSHOT
  • TABLE 27 SMOOVE SAS (VELIB) - COMPANY SNAPSHOT
  • TABLE 28 DIDI CHUXING (DIDI BIKE) - COMPANY SNAPSHOT
  • TABLE 29 CYCLEHOP LLC (HOPR) - COMPANY SNAPSHOT
  • TABLE 30 DONKEY REPUBLIC APS - COMPANY SNAPSHOT
  • TABLE 31 BEIJING MOBIKE TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD. (MEITUAN BIKE) - COMPANY SNAPSHOT
  • TABLE 32 NEXTBIKE GMBH - COMPANY SNAPSHOT
  • TABLE 33 OFO INC. - COMPANY SNAPSHOT
  • TABLE 34 WHEELS LABS INC. - COMPANY SNAPSHOT
  • TABLE 35 G.BIKE - COMPANY SNAPSHOT
  • TABLE 36 YOUON TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD. (HELLOBIKE) - COMPANY SNAPSHOT
  • TABLE 37 NEUTRON HOLDINGS INC. (LIME) - COMPANY SNAPSHOT
  • TABLE 38 SOCIAL BICYCLES INC. (JUMP) - COMPANY SNAPSHOT
  • TABLE 39 BYCYSHARE TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. (MOBYCY) - COMPANY SNAPSHOT

List of Figures

  • FIG 1 RESEARCH SCOPE
  • FIG 2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
  • FIG 3 BREAKDOWN OF PRIMARY RESEARCH BY REGION
  • FIG 4 BREAKDOWN OF PRIMARY RESEARCH BY INDUSTRY PARTICIPANT
  • FIG 5 BREAKDOWN OF PRIMARY RESEARCH BY COMPANY TYPE
  • FIG 6 DATA TRIANGULATION APPROACH
  • FIG 7 GLOBAL BIKE SHARING MARKET SUMMARY
  • FIG 8 VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS OF BIKE SHARING MARKET
  • FIG 9 BARGAINING POWER OF BUYERS
  • FIG 10 BARGAINING POWER OF SUPPLIERS
  • FIG 11 INTENSITY OF RIVALRY
  • FIG 12 THREAT OF NEW ENTRANTS
  • FIG 13 THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES
  • FIG 14 RIDES, BY REGION, IN MILLIONS (2017-2025)
  • FIG 15 BREAKDOWN OF THE RESPONDENTS, BY REGION
  • FIG 16 BREAKDOWN OF BIKE SHARING SERVICE USERS, BY AGE
  • FIG 17 BREAKDOWN OF BIKE SHARING SERVICE USERS, BY GENDER
  • FIG 18 BREAKDOWN OF BIKE SHARING SERVICE USERS, BY TRIP DISTANCE
  • FIG 19 BREAKDOWN OF BIKE SHARING SERVICE USERS, BY PURPOSE
  • FIG 20 BREAKDOWN OF BIKE SHARING SERVICE USERS, BY COMMUTING PATTERN
  • FIG 21 BIKE SHARING BUSINESS MODEL CANVAS
  • FIG 22 GLOBAL BIKE SHARING MARKET, BY TYPE, $M (2017-2025)
  • FIG 23 GLOBAL BIKE SHARING MARKET, BY REGION, $M (2017-2025)
  • FIG 24 NORTH AMERICA BIKE SHARING MARKET SNAPSHOT
  • FIG 25 NORTH AMERICA BIKE SHARING MARKET, BY TYPE, $M (2017-2025)
  • FIG 26 NORTH AMERICA BIKE SHARING MARKET, BY COUNTRY, $M (2017-2025)
  • FIG 27 NORTH AMERICA BIKE SHARING MARKET SHARE OF KEY PLAYERS (2018)
  • FIG 28 EUROPE BIKE SHARING MARKET SNAPSHOT
  • FIG 29 EUROPE BIKE SHARING MARKET, BY TYPE, $M (2017-2025)
  • FIG 30 EUROPE BIKE SHARING MARKET, BY COUNTRY, $M (2017-2025)
  • FIG 31 EUROPE BIKE SHARING MARKET SHARE OF KEY PLAYERS (2018)
  • FIG 32 APAC BIKE SHARING MARKET SNAPSHOT
  • FIG 33 APAC BIKE SHARING MARKET, BY TYPE, $M (2017-2025)
  • FIG 34 APAC BIKE SHARING MARKET, BY COUNTRY, $M (2017-2025)
  • FIG 35 APAC BIKE SHARING MARKET SHARE OF KEY PLAYERS (2018)
  • FIG 36 LAMEA BIKE SHARING MARKET SNAPSHOT
  • FIG 37 LAMEA BIKE SHARING MARKET, BY TYPE, $M (2017-2025)
  • FIG 38 LAMEA BIKE SHARING MARKET, BY COUNTRY, $M (2017-2025)
  • FIG 39 LAMEA BIKE SHARING MARKET SHARE OF KEY PLAYERS (2018)
  • FIG 40 GLOBAL BIKE SHARING MARKET SHARE OF KEY PLAYERS (2018)
目次

Bike Sharing Market Size to Almost Double during 2019-2025

Or

Bike Sharing Market Growing on Account of Rising Road Congestion

With urbanization, the demand for daily commuting is also growing. People need an efficient transportation mode to travel from their homes to an intermediate point, such as a bus stop or metro station, and then from that intermediate point to work, college or any other destination. Additionally, a large number of people also travel directly between their home and destination, without using intermediary modes of transport. Hiring a cab or using other public transit services can be slightly expensive and not always reliable, in terms of efficiency, which is why the demand for micromobility services, including bike (bicycle) sharing, is rising.

From $2.7 billion in 2018, the bike sharing services market is expected to grow to $5.0 billion by 2025, at a 10.2% CAGR during 2019-2025 (forecast period). Dock-less and station-based are the two types of bike sharing services available across the world, of which dock-less services were more popular in 2017-2018. This is because dock-less bikes can be picked up and dropped off anywhere, as per the convenience of riders, which makes them more popular. Even service providers prefer dock-less bikes, as these require less capital expenditure than the station-based system.

Among the two types of bikes available for sharing purposes - pedal and electric - e-bikes are rapidly gaining popularity. The major reason behind it is that such vehicles are capable of higher speeds, compared to manually operated bikes. As the demand for higher speeds for short-distance traveling is increasing, so is the preference for e-bikes. People are ignoring the fact that sharing services on pedal-assisted bikes are cheaper than e-bikes, as the latter offer effortless driving, more convenience, and variable motor power, apart from higher speed.

Along with offering commuters cost efficiency, bike sharing also helps in tackling the problem of road congestion. With the increasing population, especially in cities, the number of vehicles on the roads is also going up. This is leading to the growing problem of urban congestion, which is prompting governments across the world to encourage the usage of bikes for first- and last-mile commute. As such vehicles take up significantly less space on roads and also require smaller parking slots, these help in controlling the traffic congestion.

Yet another factor tipping the scales in shared bikes' favor is the convenience they offer to users. Commuters have to pay a small registration fee, followed by additional charges for every 30 minutes of travel. Additionally, bicycles are available 24 hours a day, making round-the-clock commute possible. Service providers have mobile applications, which provide important details, regarding the bikes, to users, along with instant booking facility. As there are no fixed parking spots (for dock-less services), people can keep the vehicles anywhere, after the end of their journey, which saves the time, otherwise spent in locating parking stations.

The bike sharing market growth in Europe is predicted to be the fastest across the globe, as a large number of service providers would venture into the region in the coming years. In regional countries, bikes are being rapidly made available near major transit hubs, such as railway stations, thereby offering users convenience and ease of travel. Additionally, the European Union (EU) also promotes such services, as they are environment-friendly and help reduce traffic.

Therefore, with an increasing number of people demanding cost-effective daily commuting options, the popularity of bike sharing services would continue increasing.

Table of Contents

Chapter 1. Research Background

  • 1.1 Research Objectives
  • 1.2 Market Definition
  • 1.3 Research Scope
    • 1.3.1 Market Segmentation by Type
    • 1.3.2 Market Segmentation by Region
    • 1.3.3 Analysis Period
    • 1.3.4 Market Data Reporting Unit
      • 1.3.4.1 Value
  • 1.4 Key Stakeholders

Chapter 2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1 Secondary Research
  • 2.2 Primary Research
    • 2.2.1 Breakdown of Primary Research Respondents
      • 2.2.1.1 By region
      • 2.2.1.2 By industry participant
      • 2.2.1.3 By company type
  • 2.3 Market Size Estimation
  • 2.4 Data Triangulation
  • 2.5 Assumptions for the Study

Chapter 3. Executive Summary

Chapter 4. Introduction

  • 4.1 Definition
    • 4.1.1 By Type
      • 4.1.1.1 Station-based
      • 4.1.1.2 Dock-less
  • 4.2 Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.3 Market Dynamics
    • 4.3.1 Trends
      • 4.3.1.1 Partnerships between mobility as a service (MaaS) providers and bike sharing companies
    • 4.3.2 Drivers
      • 4.3.2.1 Economical mobility option
      • 4.3.2.2 Deployment of e-bikes
      • 4.3.2.3 Urban road congestion
      • 4.3.2.4 Greater convenience
      • 4.3.2.5 Impact analysis of drivers on market forecast
    • 4.3.3 Restraints
      • 4.3.3.1 Vandalism, thefts, and improper parking
      • 4.3.3.2 Regulatory hurdles
      • 4.3.3.3 Impact analysis of restraints on market forecast
    • 4.3.4 Opportunities
      • 4.3.4.1 Increasing integration of other modes of transport
  • 4.4 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.4.1 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.4.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.4.3 Intensity of Rivalry
    • 4.4.4 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.4.5 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.5 Rides by Region

Chapter 5. User Analysis of Bike Sharing Service

  • 5.1 By Age
  • 5.2 By Gender
  • 5.3 By Trip Distance
  • 5.4 By Purpose
  • 5.5 By Commuting Pattern

Chapter 6. Business Model

  • 6.1 Infrastructure
  • 6.2 Offerings
  • 6.3 Customers
  • 6.4 Finance

Chapter 7. Regulatory Landscape of Global Market

  • 7.1 North America
    • 7.1.1 U.S.
    • 7.1.2 Canada
  • 7.2 Europe
    • 7.2.1 Germany
    • 7.2.2 Italy
    • 7.2.3 France
    • 7.2.4 U.K.
  • 7.3 APAC
    • 7.3.1 China
    • 7.3.2 India
    • 7.3.3 Singapore

Chapter 8. Global Market Size and Forecast

  • 8.1 By Type
  • 8.2 By Region

Chapter 9. North America Market Size and Forecast

  • 9.1 By Type
  • 9.2 By Country
  • 9.3 Market Share Analysis of Major Players

Chapter 10. Europe Market Size and Forecast

  • 10.1 By Type
  • 10.2 By Country
  • 10.3 Market Share Analysis of Major Players

Chapter 11. APAC Market Size and Forecast

  • 11.1 By Type
  • 11.2 By Country
  • 11.3 Market Share Analysis of Major Players in APAC

Chapter 12. LAMEA Market Size and Forecast

  • 12.1 By Type
  • 12.2 By Country
  • 12.3 Market Share Analysis of Major Players

Chapter 13. Competitive Landscape of Global Bike Sharing Market

  • 13.1 List of Key Players and Their Offerings
  • 13.2 Market Share Analysis of Key Players
  • 13.3 Competitive Benchmarking of Key Players
  • 13.4 Recent Strategic Developments By Key Players
    • 13.4.1 Service launches
    • 13.4.2 Partnerships
    • 13.4.3 Investments
    • 13.4.4 Mergers and acquisitions
    • 13.4.5 Other developments

Chapter 14. Company Profiles

  • 14.1 Motivate Inc. (Citi Bike)
    • 14.1.1 Company Overview
    • 14.1.2 Company Snapshot
  • 14.2 Bond Mobility Inc. (Smide)
    • 14.2.1 Company Overview
    • 14.2.2 Company Snapshot
  • 14.3 Anywheel Pte. Ltd.
    • 14.3.1 Company Overview
    • 14.3.2 Company Snapshot
  • 14.4 Yulu Bikes Pvt. Ltd.
    • 14.4.1 Company Overview
    • 14.4.2 Company Snapshot
  • 14.5 SMOOVE SAS (Velib)
    • 14.5.1 Company Overview
    • 14.5.2 Company Snapshot
  • 14.6 DiDi Chuxing (DiDi Bike)
    • 14.6.1 Company Overview
    • 14.6.2 Company Snapshot
  • 14.7 CycleHop LLC (HOPR)
    • 14.7.1 Company Overview
    • 14.7.2 Company Snapshot
  • 14.8 Donkey Republic ApS (Donkey Republic)
    • 14.8.1 Company Overview
    • 14.8.2 Company Snapshot
  • 14.9 Beijing Mobike Technology Co. Ltd. (Meituan Bike)
    • 14.9.1 Company Overview
    • 14.9.2 Company Snapshot
  • 14.10 Nextbike GmbH (nextbike)
    • 14.10.1 Company Overview
    • 14.10.2 Company Snapshot
  • 14.11 Ofo Inc. (Ofo)
    • 14.11.1 Company Overview
    • 14.11.2 Company Snapshot
  • 14.12 Wheels Labs Inc.
    • 14.12.1 Company Overview
    • 14.12.2 Company Snapshot
  • 14.13 G.bike
    • 14.13.1 Company Overview
    • 14.13.2 Company Snapshot
  • 14.14 Youon Technology Co. Ltd. (Hellobike)
    • 14.14.1 Company Overview
    • 14.14.2 Company Snapshot
  • 14.15 Neutron Holdings Inc. (Lime)
    • 14.15.1 Company Overview
    • 14.15.2 Company Snapshot
  • 14.16 Social Bicycles Inc. (JUMP)
    • 14.16.1 Company Overview
    • 14.16.2 Company Snapshot
  • 14.17 Bycyshare Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (Mobycy)
    • 14.17.1 Company Overview
    • 14.17.2 Company Snapshot

Chapter 15. Appendix

  • 15.1 Abbreviations
  • 15.2 Sources and References
  • 15.3 Related Reports

株式会社グローバルインフォメーション
© Copyright 1996-2020, Global Information, Inc. All rights reserved.