市場調査レポート

光ファイバーブロードバンドアクセスの主な動向:技術と市場

Major Trends in Fiber Optics Broadband Access - Technologies and Markets

発行 Practel, Inc. 商品コード 136249
出版日 ページ情報 英文
納期: 即日から翌営業日
価格
こちらの商品の販売は終了いたしました。
Back to Top
光ファイバーブロードバンドアクセスの主な動向:技術と市場 Major Trends in Fiber Optics Broadband Access - Technologies and Markets
出版日: 2010年11月01日 ページ情報: 英文

当商品の販売は、2016年07月01日を持ちまして終了しました。

概要

当レポートでは、PON(パッシブ光ネットワーク)向けの技術仕様について取り上げ、関連市場、産業および同タイプのアクセス技術向けの主なアプリケーションについて分析しており、GE-PON-1Gb/s、10GE-PON-10Gb/s、および10G-PON-10Gb/s技術などの分析、GE-PON、10GE-PON、および10G-PONの主要ベンダーのプロファイルをまとめ、概略下記の構成でお届けいたします。

第1章 イントロダクション

第2章 歴史

  • PON開発
  • 種類
  • PON要素

第3章 イーサネットベースのPONへの道

  • 理由
  • フォーマット

第4章 GE-PON規格

  • 送信フォーマット
  • 速度
  • MPCP
  • トポロジーエミュレーションサブレイヤー
  • OAM
  • FEC
  • セキュリティ
  • QoSおよびGE-PON
  • GE-PON vs. FSAN技術

第5章 GE-PON市場

  • PONの商業化
  • GE-PON市場予測

第6章 GE-PONベンダー

第7章 PONの発展

  • 10Gb/s E-PON
  • 10GE-PON技術

第8章 IEEE vs. ITU

第9章 10GE-PON市場

  • 概要
  • 促進因子・対象アプリケーション
  • 市場予測

第10章 10GE-PONベンダー

第11章 事例:10GE-PONトライアルとデモンストレーション(2009-2010年)

第12章 RFoG技術の発展

  • 範囲
  • 将来の拡張:RF-PON
  • 市場予測
  • RFoGベンダー

第13章 10G-PON

  • 状況
  • 比較
  • ベンダー

第14章 結論

付録?

図表

目次

Abstract

This report addresses specifics of technologies for Passive Optical Networks. It also analyzes related markets, the industry and major applications for this type of access technologies.

Particular, the report concentrates on:

  • GE-PON - 1 Gb/s technology - developed by the IEEE
  • 10GE-PON - 10 Gb/s technology - developed by the IEEE
  • 10G-PON - 10 Gb/s technology - standardized by ITU
  • RFoG - RF over Glass technology - standardized by Society of Cable and Telecommunications Engineers.

The choice of selected topics was prompted by results of the analysis major trends in fiber optics broadband access technologies and users' demand:

  • Ethernet became an official data standard
  • "Ethernet everywhere" concept is being implemented, and proliferation of the technology extends from desktops to core networks
  • E-PON keeps all major features of Ethernet
  • Users' demand of higher bandwidth
  • A key trend in the telecommunications industry is the extension of fiber deeper into the network to provide increased video capacity, voice and ultra-broadband data services to business and residential customers. RFoG is one of such technologies, which brings fiber to a customer' s premises.
  • Coexistence. 10 Gb/s PONs are being developed as an extension of 1 Gb/s technology. Though future PONs (40 Gb/s and up) will not be necessary tied to the existing networks, the analyzed in the report period of time restricted by coexistence of older and newer technologies; the market development and price-efficiency make this one of the major factors for technologies to succeed.
  • One more trend was emphasized in the report: ICs microminiaturization and advanced packaging allow creating compact and cost-efficient platform that may support various technologies, including GE-PON, G-PON, 10GE-PON and 10G-PON as well as other.

The report aim is to reach to a wide audience of technical, management and sales staff involved in the development of telecommunications and related industries.

Research Methodology

Considerable research was done using the Internet. Information from various Web sites was studied and analyzed. Evaluation of publicly available marketing and technical publications was conducted. Telephone conversations and interviews were held with industry analysts, technical experts and executives. In addition to these interviews and primary research, secondary sources were used to develop a more complete mosaic of the market landscape, including industry and trade publications, conferences and seminars.

The overriding objective throughout the work has been to provide valid and relevant information. This has led to a continual review and update of the information content.

Target Audience

This report is important to a wide population of researches, technical and sales staff involved in the developing of the PON services and products. It is recommended for both service providers and vendors that are working with related technologies. The report also helps to understand issues associated with relationship between PON and other technologies.

Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction 10

  • 1.1 General 10
  • 1.2 PON Appearance 10
  • 1.3 PON: Ethernet Family 11
  • 1.4 FSAN-ITU 12
  • 1.5 RFoG 12
  • 1.6 Scope 12
  • 1.5 Research Methodology 13
  • 1.6 Target Audience 13

2.0 History 14

  • 2.1 PON Development 14
    • 2.1.1 Why PON? 14
    • 2.1.2 The PON Proposition 15
    • 2.1.3 Principles 16
    • 2.1.4 Standards 17
    • 2.1.5 PON Classification 19
  • 2.2 Types 21
    • 2.2.1 A-PON 21
      • 2.2.1.1 General 21
      • 2.2.1.2 Frame Structure 22
    • 2.2.2 B-PON 23
      • 2.2.2.1 General 23
      • 2.2.2.2 Wavelength Allocation 23
      • 2.2.2.3 Rate 24
      • 2.2.2.4 Services 24
      • 2.2.2.5 Split Ratio 24
    • 2.2.3 G-PON 25
      • 2.2.3.1 General 25
  • 2.3 PON Elements 26
    • 2.3.1 Optical Line Termination (OLT) 26
      • 2.3.1.1 PON Core Shell 27
      • 2.3.1.2 Cross-connect Shell 27
      • 2.3.1.3 Service Shell 27
    • 2.3.2 Optical Network Unit (ONU) 28
    • 2.3.3 Optical Distribution Network (ODN) 28

3.0 Road to Ethernet-based PON 29

  • 3.1 Reasons 29
  • 3.2 Format 29

4.0 GE-PON Standard 32

  • 4.1 Formats of Transmission 32
    • 4.1.1 Downstream and Upstream Separation 33
    • 4.1.2 Frequencies 33
    • 4.1.3 Topology 33
    • 4.1.4 Downstream Transmission 33
    • 4.1.5 Upstream Transmission 34
    • 4.1.6 Framing 35
  • 4.2 Rates 37
    • 4.2.1 Point-to-Point (P2P) Transmission 37
    • 4.2.2 Point-to-Multipoint (P2MP) Transmission 38
    • 4.2.3 Physical Layer 38
  • 4.3 Multi-Point Control Protocol (MPCP) 39
    • 4.3.1 General 39
    • 4.3.2 Modes 40
      • 4.3.2.1 Auto-Discovery 40
      • 4.3.2.2 Bandwidth Assignment Mode 41
  • 4.4 Topology Emulation Sub-layer 42
  • 4.5 OAM 42
  • 4.6 Forward Error Correction (FEC) 44
  • 4.7 Security 44
    • 4.7.1 General 44
    • 4.7.2 Solution 44
  • 4.8 Quality of Service (QoS) and GE-PON 45
  • 4.9 GE-PON vs. FSAN Technologies 46
    • 4.9.1 GE-PON Challenges 46
    • 4.9.2 Parameters 47
    • 4.9.3 Formats 47
    • 4.9.4 Summary 47
    • 4.9.5 Comparison 48

5.0 GE-PON Market 51

  • 5.1 PON Commercialized 51
  • 5.2 GE-PON Market Estimate 52
    • 5.2.1 Equipment 54
    • 5.2.2 Providers Revenue 55

6.0 GE-PON Vendors 55

  • Ad-Net 55
  • Broadcom 57
  • Corecess 57
  • Enablence 59
  • Marvell 60
  • Mitsubishi Electric 61
  • NEC 62
  • OBN 63
  • Occam 64
  • OFN 65
  • OpticalZonu 67
  • PBN 68
  • Phyworks 69
  • PMC 70
  • UTStarcom 72
  • Source Photonics 73
  • Sun Telecom 75
  • Sumitomo Electric Networks 75
  • Tainet 76
  • Vitesse 77
  • Wuhan Xunten 77
  • ZTE 78

7.0 PON Advances 80

  • 7.1 10 Gb/s E-PON 80
    • 7.1.1 Goal 80
    • 7.1.2 IEEE - Standardization 80
      • 7.1.2.1 General 80
      • 7.1.2.2 Schedule 81
      • 7.1.2.3 Standard' s Scope and Objectives 81
  • 7.2 10GE-PON Technology 82
    • 7.2.1 Inheritance 82
    • 7.2.2 ONU Types 84
    • 7.2.3 Major Improvements and Details 85
      • 7.2.3.1 Improved FEC 85
      • 7.2.3.2 Interfaces and Power Budget 85
      • 7.2.3.3 Signal Formats and MAC Protocol 87
        • 7.2.3.3.1 Transmission 87
        • 7.2.3.3.2 Spectrum Allocation 87
        • 7.2.3.3.3 Dynamic Bandwidth Allocation 88

8.0 IEEE vs. ITU 89

9.0 10GE-PON Market 90

  • 9.1 General 90
  • 9.2 Drivers and Target Applications 91
    • 9.2.1 Major Applications 91
    • 9.2.2 Regional Differences 91
  • 9.3. Market Estimate 92

10.0 10GE-PON Vendors 94

  • Alloptic (Was acquired by CTDI in 2010) 94
  • Cortina 95
  • HISense 96
  • Hitachi 97
  • Huawei 98
  • Gennum 98
  • GigaLight 99
  • K-Micro 100
  • Mitsubishi Electric 100
  • Neophotonics 101
  • Opulan (Atheros) 102
  • PMC-Siera 103
  • Teknovus (Was acquired by Broadcom in 2010) 104
  • Vitesse 106
  • ZTE 106

11.0 Examples: 10GE-PON Trials and Demonstration (2009-2010) 108

  • 11.1 ZTE 108
  • 11.2 Opulan (Atheros), Hisense and Vitesse 108

12.0 RFoG Technology Development 109

  • 12.1 Scope 109
    • 12.1.1 Hybrid Fiber Coaxial (HFC) Technology 109
    • 12.1.2 RFoG Solution 110
      • 12.1.2.1 General 110
        • 12.1.2.1.1 Standardization 111
      • 12.1.2.2 Transmission 113
      • 12.1.2.3 Target 113
      • 12.1.2.4 RFoG Major Benefits and Issues 114
      • 12.1.2.5 Mechanism 116
    • 12.1.3 Similarities and Differences 117
  • 12.2 Future Extensions - RF-PON 118
    • 12.2.1 Projects Samples 122
  • 12.3 Market Estimate 123
  • 12.4 RFoG Vendors 125
  • Alloptic - CTDI (Alloptic was acquired by CTDI in 2010) 125
  • Arris 127
  • Aurora Networks 128
  • Calix 129
  • Cisco 131
  • Commscope 132
  • Electroline 133
  • Enablence 134
  • Hitachi 134
  • Lootom 136
  • Motorola 136
  • PBN 138
  • QAMnet 139
  • Tellion 141

13.0 10G-PON 143

  • 13.1 Status 143
    • 13.1.1 History 143
      • 13.1.1.1 Smooth Migration 145
      • 13.1.1.2 Support 145
      • 13.1.1.3 FSAN/ITU-T NG-PON 145
        • 13.1.1.3.1 Evolution 146
        • 13.1.1.3.2 Recommendations 147
  • 13.2 Comparison 149
  • 13.3 Vendors 150
  • Alcatel-Lucent 150
  • Huawei 151
  • Motorola 152
  • NeoPhotonics 153
  • Xelerated 153
  • ZTE 154

14.0 Conclusions 157

Appendix I: IEEE P1904.1 Working Group: Standard for Service Interoperability in Ethernet Passive Optical Networks (SIEPON) 158

  • Figure 1: PON Reference Model 16
  • Figure 2: PON Details 17
  • Figure 3: PON Architecture Illustration 20
  • Figure 4: A-PON Illustration 22
  • Figure 5: B-PON Enhancements (Downstream) 24
  • Figure 6: G-PON Illustration 26
  • Figure 7: OLT Functional Block Diagram 27
  • Figure 8: ONU Functional Block Diagram 28
  • Figure 9: Ethernet Channel Simplified 30
  • Figure 10: Ethernet Frame - Basic Structure 31
  • Figure 11: GE-PON Channel 33
  • Figure 12: Illustration - Downstream Transmission 34
  • Figure 13: Illustration - Upstream Transmission 35
  • Figure 14: Illustration - Downstream Frame 36
  • Figure 15: Upstream Frame 37
  • Figure 16: GE-PON OAM Process Standardization 43
  • Figure 17: GE-PON Functionality Layers 48
  • Figure 18: Penetration Dependence 52
  • Figure 19: Asia Pacific: Subscribers Base for GE-PON (Mil.) 54
  • Figure 20: Asia Pacific: GE-PON Market Development (Equipment Sales TAM $B) 54
  • Figure 21: Estimate: GE-PON Providers Revenue (Asia Pacific; $M) 55
  • Figure 22: GE-PON - 10GE-PON Scenario 84
  • Figure 23: 10GE-PON Protocol Stack 87
  • Figure 24: 10GE-PON Spectrum Allocation 88
  • Figure 25: U.S. Providers 90
  • Figure 26: TAM: Asia Pacific 10GE-PON Equipment sales ($B) 93
  • Figure 27: HFC Frequencies Assignment Illustration 110
  • Figure 28: HFC and RFoG Illustration 114
  • Figure 29: RFoG and GE-PON Frequencies Allocation 119
  • Figure 30: Illustration: PON Overlay 121
  • Figure 31: Comparative Characteristics 122
  • Figure 32: Estimate: U.S. FRoG Equipment Sales ($M) 124
  • Figure 33: Estimate: U.S. Service Providers Revenue-New RFoG Installations ($M) 125
  • Figure 34: Evolution Illustration 147
  • Figure 35: Process 149
  • Table 1: PON Standardization 19
  • Table 2: G-PON Signal Rates 25
  • Table 3: EFM Physical Layer 39
  • Table 4: Major PON Providers: Illustration 51
  • Table 5: PON Service Scenarios 52
  • Table 6: GE-PON Statistics 53
  • Table 7: GE-PON Equipment Market Components Distribution (2010) 54
  • Table 8: IEEE 802.3av WG Schedule 81
  • Table 9: PRX30 Downstream Specification 86
  • Table 10: Interfaces 87
  • Table 11: Frequency Plans 121
  • Table 12: Comparison 147
  • Table 13: G.987 Family 148
  • Table 14: PONs Comparison 150
Back to Top