表紙
市場調査レポート

定量的免疫測定市場

2013 Quantitative Immunoassay Dashboard (North America and Europe) Series 2

発行 Percepta Associates Inc. 商品コード 189233
出版日 ページ情報 英文
納期: 即日から翌営業日
価格
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=101.50円で換算しております。
Back to Top
定量的免疫測定市場 2013 Quantitative Immunoassay Dashboard (North America and Europe) Series 2
出版日: 2013年01月23日 ページ情報: 英文
概要

免疫測定は、タンパク質の同定と定量化において一般に用いられています。癌の診断や免疫学、疾患研究などの様々な応用分野をもち、免疫測定は学術界、産業界の研究者が広く用いています。ライフサイエンスサプライヤーは免疫測定市場において製品やサービスの改善につとめており、免疫測定は今後もライフサイエンス業界において重要な成長分野となるとみられています。

当レポートでは、免疫測定市場をいくつかの指標をもとに分析し、免疫測定市場の機会と市場成長率、市場シェア、顧客満足度とサプライヤーの動向、免疫測定の応用運などをまとめ、概略下記の構成で取り上げております。

  • 図表
  • エグゼクティブサマリー
  • 主な調査結果と影響
  • 免疫測定
  • 免疫測定市場機会マトリクス
  • 調査方法
  • 調査に関する案内文
  • 回答者人口統計
  • ライフサイエンス技術実績頻度
  • 免疫測定技法の実施頻度
  • 反応処理量と市場成長率
  • 回答者の反応あたりの価格
  • 市場全体の規模、セグメント別の規模、市場全体の成長率
  • セグメント別市場シェア
  • 顧客満足度とサプライヤー変更への関心
  • 購買決定に影響を及ぼす製品特性
  • 主な用途とタンパク質の使用
  • 免疫測定製品に望まれる変化
  • 付録:調査質問事項
  • 図表

このページに掲載されている内容は最新版と異なる場合があります。詳細はお問い合わせください。

目次
Product Code: 1301IMM

Immunoassays are commonly used laboratory tests for identification and quantification of proteins. With a range of applications in diagnosis of cancer, immunology and disease research, immunoassays are widely used by scientists in academia and industry. As life science suppliers continue improving products and services in the immunoassays market, immunoassay kits and reagents represent a key growth area in the life sciences industry.

The 2013 Quantitative Immunoassay Dashboard™ was developed from responses to a 24-question survey completed by 553 scientists located in North America and Europe. This Dashboard reveals key market indicators for the Immunoassay market as a whole as well as for the following methods representing market sub-segments:

  • Colorimetric ELISA
  • Chemiluminescent ELISA
  • Fluorescent ELISA
  • Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassays
  • Bead-based Immunoassays

Percepta's 2013 Quantitative Immunoassay Dashboard™ is the second in a series that characterizes the dynamic market for immunoassay methods. This 2013 Dashboard provides a snapshot of the current market landscape that is compared with data from the 2011 Quantitative Immunoassay Dashboard, providing an ongoing story of how the market is adapting to new products, new competitors and new sales and marketing strategies.

Respondent Demographics

Respondents from the academic, government and commercial market segments are well represented, with 63.8% of the respondents employed in an academic setting, 34.6% in an industrial setting and 1.8% of respondents work for government organizations. 71.4% of respondents are from North America, while 28.6% reside in Europe.

Junior (Lab Tech, Grad Students, Post-Doctoral Fellow), mid-level (Department Manager, Project Manager, Scientist, Core Manager, Professor, Instructor, Lab Manager) and senior (PI, Group Leader, Lab Director, Senior Scientist, CEO) scientists are well represented in the data set, with the most cited job titles being Principal Investigator (16.6% of respondents) and Post-Doctoral Fellow/Research Fellow (13.0%).

A wide variety of scientific areas of specialization is also evident, led by molecular biology (selected by 64.4% of respondents as their area of expertise), cell biology (57.3%) and biochemistry (45.4%). Immunology (38.3%), oncology (25.0%), microbiology/infectious disease/virology (24.4%), genetics (22.2%) and drug discovery (21.5%) are the only other areas of expertise selected by more than 20.0% of respondents.

Small (1 to 5 scientists), mid-size (6 to 10 scientists) and large laboratories (>10 scientists) are well represented in the respondent data set. A total of 41.0% of survey participants work in labs where one to five people perform experiments. 28.9% are employed in labs with six to ten scientists, while the remaining 30.0% of respondents work in labs where greater than 10 individuals work at the bench.

SAMPLE

Figure 16: Primary Reagent Supplier - Colorimetric ELISA

Table of Contents

  • 8. Figures and Tables
  • 12. Executive Summary
  • 14. Key Findings and Implications
  • 18. Immunoassay Dashboard
  • 21. Immunoassay Market Opportunity Matrix
  • 23. Survey Methodology
  • 25. Survey Invitation Text
  • 26. Respondent Qualification
  • 28. Respondent Demographics
  • 37. Frequency of Performance of Life Science Techniques
  • 42. Frequency of Performance of Various Immunoassay Methods
  • 66. Throughput and Market Growth Rates
  • 86. Respondents' Stated Price per Reaction
  • 90. Total Market Size, Market Segment Sizes and Total Market Growth Rate
  • 92. Market Shares by Segment (Share of Mentions)
  • 119. Customer Satisfaction and Interest in Switching Suppliers
  • 126. Product Features That Influence Purchasing Decisions
  • 130. Primary Downstream Applications and Use of Protein Classes
  • 138. Desired Changes to Immunoassay Products
  • 148. Survey Questionnaire
  • 157. Appendix I: Abbreviated Techniques

Figures and Tables

  • Figure 1: Respondents' Place of Employment
  • Figure 2: Respondents' Location
  • Figure 3: Respondents' Job Title
  • Figure 4: Respondents' Areas of Expertise/Specialization
  • Figure 5: Number of Employees in Respondents' Laboratories
  • Figure 6: Percentage of Respondents Performing Various Life Science Techniques at Least a Few Times per Year
  • Figure 7: Percentage of Respondents Performing Immunoassay Methods
  • Figure 8A: Percentage of Respondents Performing Immunoassay Methods by Place of Employment
  • Figure 8B: Percentage of Respondents Performing Immunoassay Methods by Location
  • Figure 9: Percentage of Respondents Performing Additional Protein Related Methods At Least Once Every Six Months
  • Figure 10: Frequency of Performance of Colorimetric ELISA
  • Figure 11: Frequency of Performance of Chemiluminescent ELISA
  • Figure 12: Frequency of Performance of Fluorescent ELISA
  • Figure 13: Frequency of Performance of Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassays
  • Figure 14: Frequency of Performance of Bead-based Immunoassays
  • Figure 15: Preference for Immunoassay Reagent Formats
  • Figure 16: Primary Reagent Supplier - Colorimetric ELISA
  • Figure 17: Primary Reagent Supplier - Chemiluminescent ELISA
  • Figure 18: Primary Reagent Supplier - Fluorescent ELISA
  • Figure 19: Primary Reagent Supplier - Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassays
  • Figure 20: Primary Reagent Supplier - Bead-based Immunoassays
  • Figure 21: Respondents' Use of Luminex Bead-based Immunoassays
  • Figure 22: Respondents' Primary Supplier of Luminex X-MAP Assays
  • Figure 23: Respondent Satisfaction with Immunoassay Methods
  • Figure 24: Percentage of Respondents that have Switched Suppliers in the Last Six Months
  • Figure 25: Most Important Features of Products for Protein Analysis
  • Figure 26: Respondents' Use of Protein Classes/Categories
  • Figure 27: Desired Changes to Immunoassay Products
  • Table 1: Frequency of Performance of Various Life Science Techniques
  • Table 2: Frequency of Co-Performance of Various Life Science Techniques
  • Table 3: Frequency of Performance of Various Immunoassay Methods
  • Table 4: Frequency of Performance of Colorimetric ELISA by Place of Employment and Location
  • Table 5: Frequency of Performance of Chemiluminescent ELISA by Place of Employment and Location
  • Table 6: Frequency of Performance of Fluorescent ELISA by Place of Employment and Location
  • Table 7: Frequency of Performance of Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassays by Place of Employment and Location
  • Table 8: Frequency of Performance of Bead-based Immunoassays by Place of Employment and Location
  • Table 9: Preference for Immunoassay Reagent Formats - by Place of Employment
  • Table 10: Frequency of Co-Performance of Life Science Techniques with Immunoassay Methods
  • Table 11: Frequency of Co-Performance of Immunoassay Methods with Life Science Techniques
  • Table 12: Median, Mean and Trim Mean Monthly Throughput for Various Immunoassay Methods
  • Table 13: Median, Mean and Trim Mean Monthly Throughput for Various Immunoassay Methods - by Place of Employment
  • Table 14: Percentage of Respondents Performing Various Numbers of Immunoassay Reactions per Month
  • Table 15: Percentage of Respondents Performing Various Numbers of Immunoassay Reactions per Month - Comparison to the 2011 Dashboard
  • Table 16: Projected Growth in the Performance of Various Immunoassay Methods
  • Table 17: Median, Mean and Trim Mean Price per Reaction for Various Immunoassay Methods
  • Table 18: Median, Mean and Trim Mean Price per Reaction for Various Immunoassay Methods - Comparison to the 2011 Dashboard
  • Table 19: Estimated Market Size for Immunoassays
  • Table 20: Primary Reagent Supplier - Colorimetric ELISA by Place of Employment and Location
  • Table 21: Primary Reagent Supplier - Chemiluminescent ELISA by Place of Employment and Location
  • Table 22: Primary Reagent Supplier - Fluorescent ELISA by Place of Employment and Location
  • Table 23: Primary Reagent Supplier - Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassays - by Place of Employment and Location
  • Table 24: Primary Reagent Supplier - Bead-based Immunoassays by Place of Employment and Location
  • Table 25: Respondents' Primary Suppliers of Luminex X-MAP Assays by Place of Employment and Location
  • Table 26: Market Share Leaders for Various Immunoassay Methods
  • Table 27: Satisfaction with Various Immunoassay Products
  • Table 28: Satisfaction with Various Immunoassay Products Comparison to the 2011 Dashboard
  • Table 29: Most Important Features of Products for Protein Analysis Comparison to the 2011 Dashboard
  • Table 30: Primary Focus/Application of Protein Analysis Research
  • Table 31: Primary Focus/Application of Protein Analysis Research - Comparison to the 2011 Dashboard
Back to Top