株式会社グローバルインフォメーション
TEL: 044-952-0102
市場調査レポート

意思決定マトリクス:ID・アクセス管理ベンダーの選択

Decision Matrix: Selecting an Identity and Access Management Vendor

発行 Ovum, Ltd. 商品コード 143066
出版日 ページ情報 英文 53 Pages
納期: 即日から翌営業日
価格
こちらの商品の販売は終了いたしました。
Back to Top
意思決定マトリクス:ID・アクセス管理ベンダーの選択 Decision Matrix: Selecting an Identity and Access Management Vendor
出版日: 2010年12月20日 ページ情報: 英文 53 Pages

当商品の販売は、2016年07月01日を持ちまして終了しました。

概要

規制のプレッシャーが強まり、IT企業は予算のプレッシャーにも引き続き直面する中、ID・アクセス管理ソリューションは、分散・仮想化の進む企業を資源効率的に安全を確保するために必要なツールのひとつとなっています。

当レポートは、企業が最適なID・アクセス管理(IAM)ベンダーを選択するための意思決定マトリクスについて、概略以下の構成で取り上げています。

サマリー

  • 発展媒体
  • Ovumの見解
  • 主なメッセージ

市場の発展

  • 世界的な不況の中、IAMは優先度合の高い領域
  • 市場にはほぼ変化はなく、規制が依然として最大の活性要素
  • 重大なツール選択要素とするためにどのようにピースを統合するか
  • 使い古された言葉ながら、クラウドはIAM領域を明確にするために関係がある
  • 役割管理は往々にして過剰に宣伝されるがその一部は成長の見込み
  • IAMと重複し始めたDLPとSIEM
  • ID・アクセス管理の意思決定マトリクス
  • トップパフォーマーであるIBM、CA、Novell、Oracle
  • OracleとSunの連合でOracleがトップIAMベンダーに
  • 現在は包括的とみなされるMicrosoftのサービス
  • 小規模ベンダーながら印象的なIAMパッケージを出しているHitachiとEvidian

市場のリーダー

  • 概要
  • 市場のリーダー:技術
  • 技術のリーダーの状況が映すIAM市場の成熟度
  • 多くのカテゴリでリーダーとなっている「最終選考」ベンダー
  • 強力な認証は依然として専門家の事業
  • 市場のリーダー:顧客感情
  • 一様に素晴らしいものでもない「最終選考」ベンダーの実績
  • 極めて印象的なHitachi-IDの実績
  • 市場のリーダー:市場への影響
  • IAM巨大企業の中にいるOracle
  • IAM大手より成長の速い小規模ベンダー

ベンダー分析

  • CA:ID・アクセス管理レーダー
  • 提言:最終候補
  • Entrust:ID・アクセス管理レーダー
  • 提言:開拓
  • Evidian:ID・アクセス管理レーダー
  • 提言:考慮
  • Hitachi-ID:ID・アクセス管理レーダー
  • 提言:考慮
  • IBM:ID・アクセス管理レーダー
  • 提言:最終候補
  • Microsoft:ID・アクセス管理レーダー
  • 提言:考慮
  • Novell:ID・アクセス管理レーダー
  • 提言:最終候補
  • Oracle:ID・アクセス管理レーダー
  • 提言:最終候補
  • RSA Security:ID・アクセス管理レーダー
  • 提言:開拓
  • 結論

付属資料

  • Ovumの評価
  • 調査手法
  • 関連報告書
  • 定義
  • 著者
  • Ovumコンサルティング
  • 免責

図表

目次
Product Code: OI00030-002

Abstract

Introduction

As regulatory pressures increase and IT organizations continue to face budget pressures, identity and access management solutions become part of the toolset necessary to secure the increasingly distributed and virtual enterprise in a resource-efficient way. Ovum has developed this Decision Matrix to help enterprises select the most appropriate IAM suite vendors.

Features and benefits

  • IAM suite vendor benchmarking across functional capabilities, end-user assessment of product and service quality, and market presence.
  • Benchmarking of IAM suite vendors across key IAM technologies, such as single sign-on, federation, and web access control.
  • Helps understand key IAM vendors' focus areas and priorities.
  • Helps identify key IAM trends impacting selection decisions and vendor roadmaps.
  • Helps identify areas adjacent to IAM that are likely to be part of IAM portfolio selection decisions in the near term.

Highlights

IBM, CA, Novell, and Oracle dominate the high end of the market and are the top overall performers. Although Hitachi and Evidian are smaller vendors, they should both be considered due to their impressive IAM suites. Microsoft' s offering can now be considered very competitive, and is widely recognized as an IAM suite provider.

In spite of the economic climate, IAM is a high-priority area of investment. Regulation is still the biggest driver and the market is still mostly unchanged. While “cloudas” a term is overused, there are areas within IAM that are very relevant to the cloud.

The importance of role management is often overstated, but distinct capabilities within role management are likely to grow in importance. DLP and SIEM are beginning to overlap with IAM. IAM is still a very fragmented market.

Your key questions answered

  • Which are the most suitable IAM suite vendors for end-to-end requirements?
  • Among the most suitable IAM suite vendors, which are the leaders across individual IAM technology dimensions, and which have the largest presence?
  • What are the key focus areas of the nine IAM vendors profiled in this report?
  • How have their customers assessed the profiled vendors' product quality, portfolio depth, and quality of the services provided?
  • What are the key trends impacting the IAM market and related areas? Which decision factors are likely to be most critical for IAM portfolio selection?

Table of Contents

SUMMARY

  • Catalyst
  • Ovum view
  • Key messages

MARKET DEVELOPMENTS

  • In spite of the global economic climate, IAM is a high-priority area
  • Regulation is still the biggest driver, and the market is mostly unchanged
  • How well the pieces integrate would be a critical tool selection factor
  • While the term is overused, the cloud is relevant to distinct IAM areas
  • Role management is often overhyped, but parts of it are likely to grow
  • DLP and SIEM are beginning to overlap with IAM
  • Identity and Access Management is still a fragmented market
  • The Identity and Access Management Decision Matrix
  • IBM, CA, Novell, and Oracle are the top overall performers
  • The combined Oracle-Sun offering makes Oracle a top IAM vendor
  • Microsoft' s offering can be now be considered comprehensive
  • Hitachi and Evidian are smaller vendors with impressive IAM suites

MARKET LEADERS

  • Overview
  • Market Leaders: Technology
  • The state of technology leadership reflects IAM market maturity
  • The ‘shortlisted' vendors are the leaders across most categories
  • Strong authentication remains a specialist business
  • Market Leaders: Customer Sentiment
  • The “Shortlisted” vendors' performance has not been uniformly stellar
  • Hitachi-ID' s performance has been extremely impressive
  • Market Leaders: Market Impact
  • Oracle is now among the IAM behemoths
  • The smaller vendors are growing faster than the IAM giants

VENDOR ANALYSIS

  • CA: Identity and Access Management Radars
  • Recommendation: Shortlist
  • Entrust: Identity and Access Management Radars
  • Recommendation: Explore
  • Evidian: Identity and Access Management Radars
  • Recommendation: Consider
  • Hitachi-ID: Identity and Access Management Radars
  • Recommendation: Consider
  • IBM: Identity and Access Management Radars
  • Recommendation: Shortlist
  • Microsoft: Identity and Access Management Radars
  • Recommendation: Consider
  • Novell: Identity and Access Management Radars
  • Recommendation: Shortlist
  • Oracle: Identity and Access Management Radars
  • Recommendation: Shortlist
  • RSA Security: Identity and Access Management Radars
  • Recommendation: Explore
  • Conclusion

APPENDIX

  • Ovum ratings
  • Methodology
  • Extended methodology
    • Technology
    • User Sentiment
    • Market Impact
  • Further reading
  • Definitions
  • Author
  • Ovum Consulting
  • Disclaimer

TABLES

  • Table: Identity and Access Management Decision Matrix

FIGURES

  • Figure: Identity and Access Management Decision Matrix
  • Figure: Market Leaders Analysis: Technology
  • Figure: Market Leaders Analysis: Customer Sentiment
  • Figure: Market Leaders Analysis: Market Impact
  • Figure: CA Identity and Access Management Radars
  • Figure: Entrust Identity and Access Management Radars
  • Figure: Evidian Identity and Access Management Radars
  • Figure: Hitachi-ID Identity and Access Management Radars
  • Figure: IBM Identity and Access Management Radars
  • Figure: Microsoft Identity and Access Management Radars
  • Figure: Novell Identity and Access Management Radars
  • Figure: Oracle Identity and Access Management Radars
  • Figure: RSA Identity and Access Management Radars
Back to Top