株式会社グローバルインフォメーション
TEL: 044-952-0102
表紙
市場調査レポート

米国のスマートウォーターインフラ:市場予測 (2017年〜2027年)

US Smart Water Infrastructure: Market Forecast (2017 - 2027)

発行 Northeast Group, LLC 商品コード 534063
出版日 ページ情報 英文 85 Pages + PowerPoint + dataset
納期: 即日から翌営業日
価格
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=108.55円で換算しております。
Back to Top
米国のスマートウォーターインフラ:市場予測 (2017年〜2027年) US Smart Water Infrastructure: Market Forecast (2017 - 2027)
出版日: 2017年07月31日 ページ情報: 英文 85 Pages + PowerPoint + dataset
概要

米国のスマートウォーターインフラ市場は、今後10年間で累積的に、83億米ドルの投資価値が見込まれています。

当レポートでは、米国のスマートウォーターインフラ市場について調査分析し、現状と予測、促進要因と障壁、ケーススタディ、主要ベンダーについて、体系的な情報を提供しています。

エグゼクティブサマリー

第1章 米国の水道市場の現状

第2章 調査結果

第3章 市場予測

第4章 促進要因と障壁

第5章 ケーススタディ

第6章 ベンダー

第7章 付録

目次

The United States has the largest and most developed smart water infrastructure market in the world, and several trends point towards continued growth and development. Northeast Group conducted a survey of nearly 340 water utilities and found that the vast majority of respondents have completed or are interested in investing in smart water infrastructure. While automated metering reading (AMR) and advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) water metering is already well developed in the US, still only approximately 60% of water customers have communicating meters, leaving ample room for market growth. Additionally, within the smart meter segment, both utilities and vendors have shown that the country is trending quickly towards AMI - even at smaller utilities. There is also an overall trend towards investing in smart city infrastructure and increased awareness of water scarcity in some parts of the country. This is creating clear growth opportunities throughout the smart water value chain.

image1

Northeast Group's survey revealed several challenges that utilities have faced, and a number of lagging utilities that are still not interested in smart water infrastructure. Vendors will need to continue to work to improve the logistics, financing, and technical capability of smart water infrastructure to overcome these hurdles. Additionally, there are no binding regulatory or urgent economic drivers that are expected to encourage a large-scale spike in near-term investment. But with multiple avenues for growth and an industry that more now than ever is seeking to modernize, the US smart water infrastructure market will represent investment value of $8.3 billion cumulatively over the next ten years.

image2

Key questions answered in this study:

  • What are the views of 90 US water utilities on smart water infrastructure investment?
  • How large will the smart water infrastructure market be in the US?
  • How quickly will US water utilities switch to AMI metering?
  • What are the main drivers and barriers of smart water projects in the US?
  • Who are the leading vendors in the market and how do they stack up in the survey?


Table of Contents

  • i. Executive summary
  • 1. Current state of US water market
  • 2. Survey results
  • 3. Market forecast
  • 4. Drivers and barriers
  • 5. Case studies
  • 6. Vendors
  • 7. Appendix
  • Appendix I: US water industry structure
  • Appendix II: Smart water overview
  • Appendix III: Utilities providing data
  • Appendix IV: Company and abbreviation lists

List of Figures and Tables

  • US smart water infrastructure: Key takeaways
  • Figure 1.1: AMI vs. AMR for water metering (cumulative and annual)
  • Figure 1.2: Potential AMI market
  • Figure 1.3: LPWAN IoT options
  • Table 1.1: Additional infrastructure and applications that can be part of communications deployment for AMI water metering
  • Figure 2.1: Overall survey responses
  • Figure 2.2: Responses from in-depth interviews
  • Figure 2.3: US water utilities by % of customers served
  • Figure 2.4: Size of utilities interviewed for smart water survey
  • Figure 2.5: AMI vs AMR choices
  • Figure 2.6: All-in per-customer smart water meter costs in project survey
  • Figure 2.7: Follow-up projects
  • Figure 2.8: Meter hardware and communications vendors used in smart water projects identified in survey
  • Figure 2.9: Project drivers reported by utilities in survey
  • Figure 2.10: Project challenges reported by utilities in survey
  • Figure 3.1: US water meter forecast (cumulative)
  • Table 3.1: US water meter forecast data
  • Figure 3.2: Total US smart water forecast (cumulative)
  • Table 3.2: US water meter forecast data
  • Figure 3.3: Responses from interviews
  • Figure 3.4: AMI vs. AMR vs. legacy for water metering (cumulative)
  • Figure 4.1: Project drivers reported by utilities in survey
  • Figure 4.2: Percentage of interviewees mentioning specific operational efficiency sub-drivers
  • Table 4.1: Utility comments about operational efficiency
  • Figure 4.3: Percentage of interviewees mentioning specific modernization sub-drivers
  • Table 4.2: Utility comments about general modernization
  • Figure 4.4: Percentage of interviewees mentioning specific conservation sub-drivers
  • Table 4.3: Utility comments about NRW and conservation concerns
  • Figure 4.5: Project challenges reported by utilities in survey
  • Table 4.4: Utility comments about project financing
  • Figure 4.6: Percentage of interviewees mentioning specific logistics subdrivers
  • Table 4.5: Utility comments about logistical challenges
  • Figure 4.7: Percentage of interviewees mentioning specific concern over technology sub-drivers
  • Table 4.6: Utility comments about technology concerns
  • Figure 5.1: Case studies
  • Table 5.1: MWU AMI drivers, challenges, and benefits
  • Figure 5.2: Project costs and savings in Asheville, NC
  • Table 5.2: SBMWD challenges to implementation
  • Table 5.3: PWS cellular infrastructure service options
  • Figure 5.4: AMI expenditure at Kennebec, Maine
  • Figure 6.1: Meter hardware and communications vendors used in projects identified in survey (number of utilities served)
  • Figure 6.2: Meter hardware and communications vendors used in projects identified in survey (number of customers served)
  • Table 6.1: Other smart water analytics vendors
  • Table 7.1: US water utilities by size
  • Figure 7.1: US water system organization
  • Figure 7.2: Ten largest US public water utilities
  • Table 7.2: Largest private water utilities in the US
  • Figure 7.3: Private ownership of community water systems by service population
  • Figure 7.4: Average household monthly water bills
  • Table 7.3: Leading challenges cited by US water utilities
  • Figure 7.5: Smart water value chain
  • Figure 7.6: Water supply chain
  • Figure 7.7: Five layers of smart water networks
  • Table 7.4: Benefits of different water metering technologies
  • Table 7.5: US water utilities providing in-depth interviews
  • Table 7.6: US water utilities providing project data
  • Figure 7.8: Utilities contacted as part of survey by state
Back to Top