株式会社グローバルインフォメーション
TEL: 044-952-0102
表紙
市場調査レポート

リモートマイクログリッドのリーダーボードレポート:リモートマイクログリッド企業12社の戦略・実行力評価

Navigant Research Leaderboard Report - Remote Microgrid Players: Assessment of Strategy and Execution for 12 Remote Microgrid Companies

発行 Navigant Research 商品コード 800059
出版日 ページ情報 英文 48 Pages; 20 Tables, Charts & Figures
即納可能
価格
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=109.20円で換算しております。
Back to Top
リモートマイクログリッドのリーダーボードレポート:リモートマイクログリッド企業12社の戦略・実行力評価 Navigant Research Leaderboard Report - Remote Microgrid Players: Assessment of Strategy and Execution for 12 Remote Microgrid Companies
出版日: 2019年03月05日 ページ情報: 英文 48 Pages; 20 Tables, Charts & Figures
概要

世界のリモートマイクログリッド市場規模は、2018年に導入費用で約30億米ドルを示し、2027年までに102億米ドル以上へと急増する見込みです。

当レポートでは、主要マイクログリッドベンダー12社の戦略・実行力について評価しており、ビジョン、市場参入戦略、製造戦略、技術、販売・マーケティング、製品パフォーマンスなど、12項目のNavigant Research独自の基準に基づく評価と企業ランキングを提供いたします。

第1章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第2章 市場概要

  • リモートマイクログリッドの定義
  • リモートマイクログリッド市場の成長促進要因
  • リモートマイクログリッド市場の障壁
  • 近年のリモートマイクログリッド市場動向

第3章 The Navigant Research Leaderboard

  • The Navigant Research Leaderboard :分類
    • リーダー
    • コンテンダー
    • チャレンジャー
    • フォロワー
  • The Navigant Research Leaderboard Grid

第4章 企業ランキング

  • リーダー
    • ENGIE
    • ABB
    • Optimal Power Solutions
  • コンテンダー
    • Schneider Electric
    • EDF
    • Caterpillar
    • OutBack Power
    • Husk Power Systems
    • Powerhive
  • チャレンジャー
    • Larsen & Toubro
    • PowerGen Renewable Energy
    • juwi

第5章 頭字語・略語リスト

第6章 目次

第7章 図表

第8章 調査範囲・手法

図表

List of Charts and Figures

  • Annual Remote Microgrid Implementation Spending by Region, Base Scenario, World Markets: 2018-2027
  • The Navigant Research Leaderboard Grid
  • ENGIE Strategy and Execution Scores
  • ABB Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Optimal Power Solutions Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Schneider Electric Strategy and Execution Scores
  • EDF Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Caterpillar Strategy and Execution Scores
  • OutBack Power Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Husk Power Systems Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Powerhive Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Larsen & Toubro Strategy and Execution Scores
  • PowerGen Renewable Energy Strategy and Execution Scores
  • juwi Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Remote Microgrid Value Chain Components

List of Tables

  • Annual Remote Microgrid Implementation Spending by Region, Base Scenario, World Markets: 2018-2027
  • The Navigant Research Leaderboard Overall Scores
  • Vendor Scores
  • Vendor Scores on Strategy Criteria
  • Vendor Scores on Execution Criteria
目次
Product Code: LB-RMG-19

The market for remote microgrids is evolving. The focus of innovation is now shifting toward business models that reduce capital cost constraints, produce greater standardization, and capture as much of the total available revenue from deployments as possible. Many of these microgrids are designed to reduce diesel fuel consumption by integrating solar PV, distributed wind, or hydropower. In 2018, the global market for remote microgrids represented about $3 billion in implementation spending, and it is expected to jump to more than $10.2 billion by 2027.

Unlike past Leaderboard reports on microgrids that attempted to compare apples to apples in terms of types of companies ranked and focused on controls technology, this report takes a different approach. Rather than narrow the scope of companies to be included, it considered a variety of companies to illustrate the diversity of vendors seeking opportunity in the remote microgrid space. As a result, a value chain capture metric was included, highlighting how different kinds of companies compare on revenue capture from remote microgrid project development.

This Navigant Research Leaderboard examines the strategy and execution of 12 leading remote microgrid companies. Threshold scores determine each vendor's categorization (Leader, Contender, Challenger, etc.). These players are rated on 12 criteria: vision; go-to market strategy; partners; business model innovation; value chain capture; geographic reach; sales, marketing, and distribution; system quality and reliability; project portfolio; pricing; and staying power. Using Navigant Research's proprietary Leaderboard methodology, vendors are profiled, rated, and ranked with the goal of providing industry participants with an objective assessment of these companies' relative strengths and weaknesses in the global remote microgrid market.

Key Questions Addressed:

  • Who are the market leaders in the remote microgrid space?
  • What kinds of companies see big opportunities in this market?
  • Which companies are capturing the majority of remote microgrid value chain revenue?
  • Which large companies are investing in smaller startups?
  • Which controls providers are focused on off-grid distributed energy resources (DER) optimization?
  • Who leads among French companies seeking new remote microgrid markets?

Who Needs This Report:

  • Microgrid developers and controls providers
  • Energy storage manufacturers
  • Reciprocal engine manufacturers
  • Mobile money innovators
  • Foundations and governments focused on energy access
  • Investor community

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

  • 1.1. Market Introduction
  • 1.2. The Navigant Research Leaderboard Grid

2. Market Overview

  • 2.1. Defining Remote Microgrids
  • 2.2. Remote Microgrid Market Drivers
    • 2.2.1. Lack of Energy Access in Key Developing World Markets
    • 2.2.2. Incremental Energy Consumption Growth Patterns
    • 2.2.3. Declining Costs of Key Microgrid-Enabling Technologies
    • 2.2.4. Global Energy Access Initiatives
  • 2.3. Remote Microgrid Market Barriers
    • 2.3.1. Private Capital Flowing Primarily to Grid-Tied Microgrids
    • 2.3.2. Subsidies that Support the Status Quo
    • 2.3.3. Energy Theft
    • 2.3.4. Lack of International Standards Targeting Remote Applications
  • 2.4. Recent Global Remote Microgrid Market Trends
    • 2.4.1. Energy as a Service Business Models
    • 2.4.2. Plug-and-Play Modular Microgrids
    • 2.4.3. Larger Players Entering the Market
    • 2.4.4. Remote Microgrid Segments
      • 2.4.4.1. Commodity Extraction
      • 2.4.4.2. Physical Islands
      • 2.4.4.3. Village Electrification

3. The Navigant Research Leaderboard

  • 3.1. The Navigant Research Leaderboard Categories
    • 3.1.1. Leaders
    • 3.1.2. Contenders
    • 3.1.3. Challengers
    • 3.1.4. Followers
  • 3.2. The Navigant Research Leaderboard Grid

4. Company Rankings

  • 4.1. Leaders
    • 4.1.1. ENGIE
    • 4.1.2. ABB
    • 4.1.3. Optimal Power Solutions
  • 4.2. Contenders
    • 4.2.1. Schneider Electric
    • 4.2.2. EDF
    • 4.2.3. Caterpillar
    • 4.2.4. OutBack Power
    • 4.2.5. Husk Power Systems
    • 4.2.6. Powerhive
  • 4.3. Challengers
    • 4.3.1. Larsen & Toubro
    • 4.3.2. PowerGen Renewable Energy
    • 4.3.3. juwi

5. Acronym and Abbreviation List

6. Table of Contents

7. Table of Charts and Figures

8. Scope of Study and Methodology

  • 8.1. Scope of Study
  • 8.2. Sources and Methodology
    • 8.2.1. Vendor Selection
    • 8.2.2. Ratings Scale
      • 8.2.2.1. Score Calculations
    • 8.2.3. Criteria Definitions
      • 8.2.3.1. Strategy
      • 8.2.3.2. Execution
Back to Top