市場調査レポート
商品コード
1093666

建設用3Dプリンティング:12社の戦略と実行力の評価

Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Report - 3D Printing for Construction: Assessment of Strategy and Execution for 12 Key Market Influencers

出版日: | 発行: Guidehouse Insights | ページ情報: 英文 38 Pages; 20 Tables, Charts & Figures | 納期: 即納可能 即納可能とは

価格
価格表記: USDを日本円(税抜)に換算
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=155.76円
建設用3Dプリンティング:12社の戦略と実行力の評価
出版日: 2022年06月23日
発行: Guidehouse Insights
ページ情報: 英文 38 Pages; 20 Tables, Charts & Figures
納期: 即納可能 即納可能とは
  • 全表示
  • 概要
  • 図表
  • 目次
概要

建設用3Dプリンティング技術の需要は、ロボット工学、材料科学、およびソフトウェアの革新に伴い、ここ5年で増加傾向にあります。建設用3Dプリンティング市場のパイオニアは、すでにパイロットプロジェクトやモデルデモンストレーションから、3D建設用プリンター、建築部品、建物一式などの製品の販売へと移行しています。

当レポートでは、世界の建設用3Dプリンティングについて調査し、建設用3Dプリンティング企業12社のプロファイル、戦略および評価などの情報を提供しています。

主要10社

  • 1.Winsun
  • 2.ICON
  • 3.Apis Cor
  • 4.Mighty Buildings
  • 5.COBOD
  • 6.WASP
  • 7.Aectual
  • 8.XtreeE
  • 9.CyBe
  • 10.Branch Technology

目次

第1章 エグゼクティブサマリー

  • 市場イントロダクション
  • ベンダーの選択基準
  • リーダーボードグリッド

第2章 市場概要

  • 市場促進要因
  • 市場の障壁
  • 市場予測

第3章 建設用3Dプリンティングのリーダーボード

  • リーダーボードカテゴリ
    • リーダー
    • コンテンダー
    • チャレンジャー
    • フォロワー
  • 建設用3Dプリンティングのリーダーボードグリッド

第4章 企業のランキング

  • リーダー
    • Winsun
    • ICON
    • Apis Cor
  • コンテンダー
    • Mighty Buildings
    • COBOD
    • WASP
    • Aectual
    • XtreeE
    • CyBe
    • Branch Technology
  • チャレンジャー
    • Be More 3D
    • SQ4D

第5章 頭字語と略語のリスト

第6章 目次

第7章 図表

第8章 調査範囲と調査手法、注記

  • 調査範囲
  • 情報源・調査手法
    • ベンダーの選択
    • 評価スケール
    • 基準の定義
図表

LIST OF CHARTS AND FIGURES

  • The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid
  • 3D Printing for Construction Revenue by Region, World Markets: 2021-2030
  • Winsun Strategy and Execution Scores
  • ICON Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Apis Cor Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Mighty Buildings Strategy and Execution Scores
  • COBOD Strategy and Execution Scores
  • WASP Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Aectual Strategy and Execution Scores
  • XtreeE Strategy and Execution Scores
  • CyBe Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Branch Technology Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Be More 3D Strategy and Execution Scores
  • SQ4D Strategy and Execution Scores

LIST OF TABLES

  • The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Overall Scores
  • 3D Printing for Construction Revenue by Region, World Markets: 2022-2031
  • The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Overall Scores
  • Vendor Scores
  • Vendor Scores on Strategy Criteria
  • Vendor Scores on Execution Criteria
目次
Product Code: LB-3DP-22

Demand for 3D printing technology for construction has been on the rise in the last five years with innovation in robotics, materials science, and software. Pioneers in the 3D printing for construction market have already made the transition from pilot projects and model demonstrations to selling their products, including 3D construction printers, building components, and complete buildings.

3D printing for construction companies have continued to invest in their technologies to develop larger and more customizable printers; generate more sustainable, durable, and cost-effective materials; further shorten construction times; and improve the quality of the finished product. These developments have allowed 3D printing for construction to become a viable solution to current problems such as the lack of affordable housing in disadvantaged communities, construction material waste, traditional construction time consumption, and human error in traditional construction methods.

This Leaderboard examines the Strategy and Execution of 12 companies that offer 3D printing for construction. Vendors for this Leaderboard were selected based on their participation on completed residential and commercial construction projects at the time it was composed. Companies that have not yet had any projects or have not been directly involved in the construction process of a completed structure have not been considered in this Leaderboard. Companies included are rated on nine criteria: vision; go-to-market strategy; partners; technology; geographic reach; marketing and distribution; product quality and performance; project portfolio; and staying power. Using Guidehouse Insights' proprietary Leaderboard methodology, vendors are profiled, rated, and ranked with the goal of providing industry participants with an objective assessment of these companies' relative strengths and weaknesses in the global 3D printing for construction market.

Top 10 Vendors

  • 1. Winsun
  • 2. ICON
  • 3. Apis Cor
  • 4. Mighty Buildings
  • 5. COBOD
  • 6. WASP
  • 7. Aectual
  • 8. XtreeE
  • 9. CyBe
  • 10. Branch Technology

KEY QUESTIONS ADDRESSED:

  • What are the drivers and barriers shaping the 3D printing for construction market?
  • What types of companies are included and excluded from this Leaderboard report?
  • Which companies are the Leaders in the 3D printing for construction market and why?
  • Which companies are the Contenders and Challengers and why?
  • How are the 3D printing for construction vendors ranked?

WHO NEEDS THIS REPORT:

  • 3D printing for construction companies
  • Construction companies
  • Building developers
  • Architectural firms
  • Building materials companies
  • Real estate investors
  • Venture capital
  • Governments
  • Affordable housing nonprofits

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

  • 1.1. Market Introduction
  • 1.2. Criteria for Vendors Selection
  • 1.3. The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid

2. Market Overview

  • 2.1. Market Drivers
  • 2.2. Market Barriers
  • 2.3. Market Forecast

3. 3D Printing for Construction Leaderboard

  • 3.1. Leaderboard Categories
    • 3.1.1. Leaders
    • 3.1.2. Contenders
    • 3.1.3. Challengers
    • 3.1.4. Followers
  • 3.2. The Leaderboard Grid for 3D Printing for Construction

4. Company Rankings

  • 4.1. Leaders
    • 4.1.1. Winsun
    • 4.1.2. ICON
    • 4.1.3. Apis Cor
  • 4.2. Contenders
    • 4.2.1. Mighty Buildings
    • 4.2.2. COBOD
    • 4.2.3. WASP
    • 4.2.4. Aectual
    • 4.2.5. XtreeE
    • 4.2.6. CyBe
    • 4.2.7. Branch Technology
  • 4.3. Challengers
    • 4.3.1. Be More 3D
    • 4.3.2. SQ4D

5. Acronym and Abbreviation List

6. Table of Contents

7. Table of Charts and Figures

8. Scope of Study and Methodology, Notes

  • 8.1. Scope of Study
  • 8.2. Sources and Methodology
    • 8.2.1. Vendor Selection
    • 8.2.2. Ratings Scale
      • 8.2.2.1. Score Calculations
    • 8.2.3. Criteria Definitions
      • 8.2.3.1. Strategy
      • 8.2.3.2. Execution