表紙:EaaS(Energy-as-a-Service):17社のEaaS(Energy-as-a-Service)ベンダーの戦略と実行力の評価
市場調査レポート
商品コード
1072680

EaaS(Energy-as-a-Service):17社のEaaS(Energy-as-a-Service)ベンダーの戦略と実行力の評価

Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Report - Energy as a Service: Assessment of Strategy and Execution for 17 EaaS Vendors

出版日: | 発行: Guidehouse Insights (formerly Navigant Research) | ページ情報: 英文 46 Pages; 24 Tables, Charts & Figures | 納期: 即納可能 即納可能とは

価格
価格表記: USDを日本円(税抜)に換算
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=128.51円
EaaS(Energy-as-a-Service):17社のEaaS(Energy-as-a-Service)ベンダーの戦略と実行力の評価
出版日: 2022年05月05日
発行: Guidehouse Insights (formerly Navigant Research)
ページ情報: 英文 46 Pages; 24 Tables, Charts & Figures
納期: 即納可能 即納可能とは
  • 全表示
  • 概要
  • 図表
  • 目次
概要

この一年間で、EaaSソリューションの開発と実行、新たな顧客層への拡大、新たなパートナーシップの形成において、市場関係者は大きな前進を遂げています。しかし、同市場はまだ初期段階にあり、普及率が低く、関係者間の差別化が進んでいることが特徴です。EaaSを提供する金融機関やプラットフォーム企業、ESCO、電力企業などが市場に参入し、さまざまな技術ソリューションで異なる顧客セグメントにサービスを提供しています。

当レポートでは、世界のEaaSについて調査し、EaaS企業17社のプロファイル、戦略および評価などの情報を提供しています。

主要10社

  • 1.Ameresco
  • 2.Schneider Electric
  • 3.Enel X
  • 4.Engie
  • 5.Redaptive
  • 6.Sparkfund
  • 7.Metrus
  • 8.Alturus
  • 9.Siemens
  • 10.Centrica

目次

第1章 エグゼクティブサマリー

  • 市場イントロダクション
  • リーダーボードグリッド

第2章 市場概要

  • 市場の定義
  • 市場促進要因
  • 市場の障壁
  • 市場予測

第3章 リーダーボード

  • リーダーボードカテゴリ
    • リーダー
    • コンテンダー
    • チャレンジャー
    • フォロワー
  • リーダーボードグリッド

第4章 企業ランキング

  • リーダー
    • Ameresco
    • Schneider Electric
    • Enel X
    • Engie
  • コンテンダー
    • Redaptive
    • Sparkfund
    • Metrus
    • Alturus
    • Siemens
    • Centrica
    • Budderfly
    • Johnson Controls
    • Bernhard
  • チャレンジャー
    • McKinstry
    • Gridium
    • Allumia
    • Trane Technologies

第5章 頭字語と略語のリスト

第6章 目次

第7章 図表

第8章 調査範囲と調査手法

  • 調査範囲
  • 情報源と調査手法
    • ベンダーの選択
    • レーティングスケール
    • 基準の定義
図表

LIST OF CHARTS AND FIGURES

  • The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid
  • EaaS Revenue by Region, World Markets: 2021-2030
  • Ameresco Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Schneider Electric Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Enel X Strategy and Execution Scores (example chart)
  • Engie Strategy and Execution Scores (example chart)
  • Redaptive Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Sparkfund Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Metrus Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Alturus Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Siemens Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Centrica Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Budderfly Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Johnson Controls Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Bernhard Strategy and Execution Scores
  • McKinstry Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Gridium Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Allumia Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Trane Technologies Strategy and Execution Scores

LIST OF TABLES

  • EaaS Financing Revenue by Region, World Markets: 2021-2030
  • The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Overall Scores
  • Vendor Scores
  • Vendor Scores on Strategy Criteria
  • Vendor Scores on Execution Criteria
目次
Product Code: LB-EaaS-22

Customers are attracted to energy as a service (EaaS) because it allows them to address sustainability, resiliency, and deferred maintenance while upgrading facilities with OPEX-only payments and immediate ROI. Outsourcing all or parts of energy management to a provider skilled in long-term performance contracts and risk transfer is increasingly compelling because of the rising complexity of available distributed energy technologies and the challenge of meeting long-term greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. Commercial, industrial, and public sector customers are starting to adopt and explore EaaS solutions at scale.

In the past year, players in the market have made significant strides in developing and executing EaaS solutions, expanding into new customer verticals, and forming new partnerships. The market is still nascent and is characterized by low adoption rates and high differentiation between players. Pure play EaaS financing and platform companies, ESCOs, utilities, and other players all participate in the market, serving different customer segments with a variety of technology solutions. Few vendors have been directly competing so far, with many companies in the Leaderboard partnering for different aspects of project delivery.

This Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard report assesses the competitive landscape for EaaS solutions and how well different companies are positioned to address current customer needs. It is intended to help market participants better understand their competitors' solution offerings, differentiation, and track record in executing EaaS projects. The report includes profiles on 17 EaaS companies and ranks them according to Strategy and Execution scores. In this market, the relative position of different vendors is likely to shift as Contenders refine their solution offerings and take on the Leaders.

Top 10 Vendors:

  • 1. Ameresco
  • 2. Schneider Electric
  • 3. Enel X
  • 4. Engie
  • 5. Redaptive
  • 6. Sparkfund
  • 7. Metrus
  • 8. Alturus
  • 9. Siemens
  • 10. Centrica

KEY QUESTIONS ADDRESSED:

  • Who are the market Leaders among EaaS providers and why?
  • What differentiates EaaS market Leaders?
  • Which companies feature the most comprehensive EaaS offerings?
  • Which companies are positioned for growth in the market?
  • How are market trends impacting the competitive landscape?

WHO NEEDS THIS REPORT:

  • EaaS companies
  • ESCOs
  • Utilities
  • Original equipment manufacturers
  • Investor community

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

  • 1.1. Market Introduction
  • 1.2. The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid

2. Market Overview

  • 2.1. Market Definition
  • 2.2. Market Drivers
  • 2.3. Market Barriers
  • 2.4. Market Forecast

3. The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard

  • 3.1. The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Categories
    • 3.1.1. Leaders
    • 3.1.2. Contenders
    • 3.1.3. Challengers
    • 3.1.4. Followers
  • 3.2. The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid

4. Company Rankings

  • 4.1. Leaders
    • 4.1.1. Ameresco
    • 4.1.2. Schneider Electric
    • 4.1.3. Enel X
    • 4.1.4. Engie
  • 4.2. Contenders
    • 4.2.1. Redaptive
    • 4.2.2. Sparkfund
    • 4.2.3. Metrus
    • 4.2.4. Alturus
    • 4.2.5. Siemens
    • 4.2.6. Centrica
    • 4.2.7. Budderfly
    • 4.2.8. Johnson Controls
    • 4.2.9. Bernhard
  • 4.3. Challengers
    • 4.3.1. McKinstry
    • 4.3.2. Gridium
    • 4.3.3. Allumia
    • 4.3.4. Trane Technologies

5. Acronym and Abbreviation List

6. Table of Contents

7. Table of Charts and Figures

8. Scope of Study and Methodology

  • 8.1. Scope of Study
  • 8.2. Sources and Methodology
    • 8.2.1. Vendor Selection
    • 8.2.2. Ratings Scale
      • 8.2.2.1. Score Calculations
    • 8.2.3. Criteria Definitions
      • 8.2.3.1. Strategy
      • 8.2.3.2. Execution