表紙
市場調査レポート

2010年のIPマルチメディアサブシステム(IMS)市場

IMS 2010 Report: Critical Success Factors

発行 Visiongain Ltd 商品コード 144394
出版日 ページ情報 英文 199 Pages
納期: 即日から翌営業日
価格
こちらの商品の販売は終了いたしました。
Back to Top
2010年のIPマルチメディアサブシステム(IMS)市場 IMS 2010 Report: Critical Success Factors
出版日: 2010年11月30日 ページ情報: 英文 199 Pages

当商品の販売は、2016年07月01日を持ちまして終了しました。

概要

IPマルチメディアサブシステム(IMS)は、次世代ネットワークの基盤となる技術であり、各種アクセスネットワークに対応する共通のコアを介してさまざまなネットワークサービスやデータの開発と導入を可能にするための堅牢なインフラストラクチャを提供します。この数年、通信事業者は、IMSよりも無線やサポートサービス、アプリケーションなどの分野に対する投資を優先させてきましたが、4Gネットワークに対応する技術としてLTEが本格的に普及する見通しになったことで、移動体通信業界内でもIMSに対する関心が再び高まっており、今後IMSは、商用パケットコア技術として広く普及すると見られています。

当レポートは、IMS市場の現状を分析し、今後の見通しを示したもので、IMS市場の成長促進要因や阻害要因、通信事業者のIMS導入戦略、IMSの導入に積極的な通信事業者、IMS関連の主要ベンダーとその戦略、2015年以降の展望、無線業界のバリューチェーンに対するIMSの影響、IMSの主な用途などを明らかにしたもので、IMSベンダーが成功するための条件や通信事業者への提言なども盛り込み、概略下記の構成でお届けいたします。

エグゼクティブサマリー

第1章 イントロダクション

  • IMSのライフサイクルステージ
  • IMSの投資収益
  • IMS市場の成長促進要因
  • 本書の目的
  • 本書の構成
  • 調査範囲
  • 調査方法

第2章 IMS:有望な技術

  • オープンアーキテクチャフレームワーク
  • IMSアーキテクチャの主な機能
  • IMSが提供可能なサービス
  • IMSネットワークの要素
  • IMS携帯端末のアーキテクチャ
  • 通信事業者にとってのメリット
  • IMSがサポートするアプリケーション
  • 各種IP無線アクセスネットワーク技術からIMSに至る道筋
  • IMS以外の選択肢
  • IMSの問題点

第3章 通信事業者がIMSに求めるもの

  • 通信事業者のサービス面の要求条件
  • 通信事業者の技術面の要求条件
  • 通信事業者の事業目標
  • IMSに対する各種の要求条件
  • IMSに対する通信事業者の疑問

第4章 IMSに対する需要の分析

  • IMSを早期に導入するユーザー
  • 各種通信事業者のIMSに対する関心の程度
  • 市場分析
  • IMSについてのデータ
  • 予測
  • FMCに対する需要
  • 機器に対する需要の分析
  • IMSに対する需要パターンの分析
  • IMSに対する需要のサマリー
  • IMSのケーススタディ

第5章 IMSベンダーの生き残り戦略

  • IMSのバリューチェーン
  • IMSインフラストラクチャベンダー
  • IMS試験/測定ソリューションのベンダー
  • ニッチベンダー
  • IMS携帯端末用クライアントのベンダー
  • 他のIMSベンダー
  • インテグレーター
  • OSS/BSSプロバイダー
  • IMSアプリケーションの開発企業
  • IMS市場における競合関係
  • 2009/2010年のIMS市場における動き
  • IMS市場の形成過程

第6章 IMSベンダーの成功条件

  • IMSへの移行投資を正当化する明確な論拠が必要
  • IMSの導入理由が変わっていることを強調する
  • 市場の活性化
  • ベンダーではなく通信事業者が需要を牽引する形にする
  • ソリューションのコストを引き下げる
  • 用語の明確化
  • アプリケーションにまつわる問題の解決
  • 携帯端末ベンダーと連携してIMS携帯端末の問題を解決
  • 通信事業者にIMS戦略の必要性を周知
  • 技術開発の成果を示す
  • IMSを導入することで通信事業者が引き続き顧客に大きな影響力を行使できるという点を示す
  • 特色ある機能や情報を提供する

第7章 通信事業者へのアドバイス

  • IMSの短期的な利点と長期的な利点
  • IMSの優れたビジネスモデル
  • IMS導入戦略
  • IMSのマーケティング戦略
  • 適切な選択肢
  • IMSについてのチェックリスト

第8章 結論

  • IMSと通信業界のバリューチェーン
  • IMSのSWOT分析
  • ベンダーへの提言
  • 通信事業者への提言
  • サマリー

付録

  • IMSの監督機関
  • IMSのプロトコル
  • Visiongainについて

図表

目次

IMS (The IP Multimedia Subsystem) is the cornerstone technology for next generation networks. It offers a robust infrastructure for developing and deploying multiple network services and data from a common core across different access networks and for evolving from circuit-switched networks towards all IP networks.IMS remains the technology of choice for fixed and hybrid operators whose legacy network resources are near or full depreciation.

Over the last few years, IMS was relegated to fringes of operator strategies. Operators often overlooked IMS in favour of investments in other areas of the network such as radio, supporting services and applications. It was not until LTE become the technology of choice for 4G, that IMS started witnessing a fresh wave of interest from players in the wireless value chain. IMS is now on the path to become a successful commercial packet core technology.

You should read the IMS report if you work within these sectors:

  • Mobile core
  • LTE
  • Mobile VOIP
  • Fixed mobile convergence
  • All IP Networks
  • Next Generation Networks
  • One Voice Initiative
  • Rich communication Suite

Although, there are positive growth pointers, not all mobile operators are on board IMS bandwagon. Some believe that it is too complex to deploy, while others believe that business case in favour of IMS cannot be generated due to costs involved.

Given the current market dynamics surrounding IMS, it is paramount for operators and vendors to identify the Critical Success Factors (CSF) for the technology itself and for their firm to compete in this highly fragmented market in the next five years. The knowledge of the CSF will help them to gain a superior competitive advantage.

Along with identifying the CSF for IMS, the report also summarises the key stakeholders and how the IMS industry is shaping up beyond 2010. Further, it offers clear and concise view to operators and vendors on all the latest developments in IMS arena.

What key questions does this report answer?

  • What are the Critical success factors for IMS?
  • What is the business case for IMS?
  • What are the operator strategies for IMS deployment?
  • Who are the key operators pursuing IMS?
  • Who are the top IMS vendors and what are their strategies in the gaining competitive advantage?
  • How will the IMS market evolve beyond 2015?
  • What will be the impact of IMS on the wireless value chain?
  • What are the key applications that can offer return on investment from IMS?

The report is aimed at executives who want to gain an overview of IMS market, its potential and information about key players and their strategies in the IMS value chain.

The following players must critically look at IMS in order to revive their lifecycle stage:

  • Cable operators
  • CDMA wireless providers
  • Internet service providers
  • Traditional telephony providers
  • WCDMA/GSM cellular operator
  • Greenfield operators; and
  • VOIP operators.

Who should read this report?

  • Operators: to make informed decisions about vendors and IMS market. Operators can also use this document as a training guide and checklist to identify issues, solutions and implementation methods.
  • Vendors can analyse the current issues facing operators in the IMS domain and gain an insight into other vendors' strategies and compare various solutions on the market. The report helps vendors to identify the operator strategies in the IMS domain.
  • Application Developers can understand the market dynamics of IMS and evaluate whether to invest in building IMS/SIP based applications.
  • Greenfield operators can understand how to capitalise on IMS architecture and gain competitive advantage over established players.
  • Investors can understand the IMS technology and market, its value chain and future potential. This report will help them evaluate the investment opportunities in the emerging IMS domain.
  • The report also acts as guide for the complementary product providers for IMS such as the test equipment manufacturers, the BSS/OSS suppliers, the billing and charging suppliers, the SDP vendors and the handset manufacturers who can formulate emergent strategies to win market share as the IMS market picks up further.

Visiongain believes new business and revenue models are emerging as increasing number of operators begin to deploy IMS. This timely report summarises the key stakeholders and how the IMS industry is shaping up beyond 2010. Offering clear and concise view to operators and vendors on all the latest developments in IMS arena. The report provides an independent and unbiased review on IMS which is a must read for everyone interested in IMS technology. Order your copy today.

Table of Contents

E. Executive Summary

  • E1. IMS for Next Generation Networks
  • E2. IMS is bringing Variety of Benefits and Opportunities for Early Adopters
  • E3. Reasons for IMS Adoption are changing
  • E4. Transitional Technologies are Occupying Centre Stage as Operators Gear towards All-IP Networks
  • E5. IMS Market Dynamics
  • E6. A Warning to Operators who plan to be the Late Adopters of IMS
  • E7. IMS will emerge as Winner in the Battle for Standards
  • E8. Time Frame for IMS Deployments
  • E9. IMS Market: Its Revival and Growth Pointers

1. Introduction

  • 1.1. IMS Lifecycle Stage
  • 1.2. Business Case for IMS
    • 1.2.1. The Greatest Strength of IMS lies in FMC (Fixed Mobile Convergence)
  • 1.3. Growth Drivers for IMS
    • 1.3.1. IMS has now become Fairly Mature and Universally Accepted Standard
    • 1.3.2. New Economic Cycle is fuelling IMS Adoption
    • 1.3.3. Mobile Operators want to remain Competitive with the Fixed Line and ' Over the Top' Service Providers
    • 1.3.4. Inability of Existing Networks to offer New Services Quickly beyond 2015
    • 1.3.5. LTE is Fuelling Demand for IMS
    • 1.3.6. Scalability of IMS architecture
    • 1.3.7. Push from IMS Vendors
    • 1.3.8. RCS and ' One Voice' Initiatives Playing a Key Role in IMS adoption
      • 1.3.8.1. RCS
      • 1.3.8.2. VOLTE or ' One Voice'
  • 1.4. Aim of the Report
  • 1.5. Report Structure
  • 1.6. Report Scope
  • 1.7. Methodology

2. IMS: The Technology in Waiting

  • 2.1. Open Architectural Framework
    • 2.1.1. IMS offers Layered Architecture
      • 2.1.1.1. Gateway or the Transport & Endpoint Layer
      • 2.1.1.2. The Session Control Layer
      • 2.1.1.3. The Application Server Layer
    • 2.1.2. Benefits of Horizontal Layered Architecture
    • 2.1.3. Access Agnostic Nature of IMS
  • 2.2. Summary of Key Features of IMS Architecture
  • 2.3. IMS Service Delivery Proposition
  • 2.4. Elements of IMS Network
  • 2.5. IMS Handset Architecture
  • 2.6. Operator Benefits from IMS
    • 2.6.1. Capability to Launch New Services Faster
    • 2.6.2. Ability to Offer Converged Services to Customers
    • 2.6.3. Open Service Creation
    • 2.6.4. Enhancement over Internet offering
    • 2.6.5. Summary of Key Operator Benefits from IMS
    • 2.6.6. End User Benefits from IMS
  • 2.7. Applications Supported by IMS
    • 2.7.1. Blended Applications
    • 2.7.2. Presence and Location-based Applications
    • 2.7.3. Mobile VOIP
    • 2.7.4. MMTel
    • 2.7.5. Push to Talk (PTT)
    • 2.7.6. Video Telephony
    • 2.7.7. IPTV
  • 2.8. Road to IMS via Transitional and All- IP RAN Technologies
    • 2.8.1. Generic Access Networks (GAN)
    • 2.8.2. LTE
      • 2.8.2.1. Circuit Switched Fallback
      • 2.8.2.2. Volga Forum
    • 2.8.3. Voice Call Continuity
  • 2.9. Other Alternatives to IMS
    • 2.9.1. Soft-Switch MSC
    • 2.9.2. DPI
    • 2.9.3. Femtocell
    • 2.9.4. IP-based Softswitch
      • 2.9.4.1. Softswitch Statistics
  • 2.10. Drawbacks of IMS

3. What Do Operators Want From IMS?

  • 3.1. Operators' Service Requirements
  • 3.2. Operators' Technical Requirements
    • 3.2.1. Standard Interoperable Solution
    • 3.1.2. Interoperability of SIP and SS7 Signalling
    • 3.1.3. Service Assurance and Risk Management
    • 3.1.4. Secured Network
    • 3.1.5. IPv4 to IPv6 Conversion
    • 3.1.6. Interoperability with Legacy Networks
    • 3.1.7. Attractive IMS Handsets
    • 3.1.8. IMS Infrastructure Availability
  • 3.2. Operators' Business Objectives
    • 3.2.1. Ability to offer Web2 applications
    • 3.2.2. Ability to offer Differentiated Services
    • 3.2.3. Expand Service offerings and Revenues
    • 3.2.4. Control Subscriber and Business Relationship
    • 3.2.5. Prosperity and Business Transformation
    • 3.2.6. An Affordable Migration Path
  • 3.3. Other Operator Requirements from IMS
    • 3.3.1. Hosted IMS Solutions
    • 3.3.2. IMS in Managed Networks
  • 3.4. Questions on IMS that Perplex Operators
    • 3.4.1. What happens to Existing Legacy Core networks?
    • 3.4.2. How will Operator' s OSS/BSS be impacted with IMS?
    • 3.4.3. How to Integrate IMS and SDP?
      • 3.4.3.1. How to address Interplay between SDP, IMS and Web 2?
    • 3.4.4. What does IMS offer that cannot be done by Existing Infrastructure?
    • 3.4.5. Does an Operator need IMS if it is pursuing Bit pipe strategy?
    • 3.4.6. Will IMS provide Competitive Advantage for Operators of LTE networks?
    • 3.4.7. Is IMS Business Case weak if centred Solely on RCS?
    • 3.4.8. Does it make Sense to have IMS Core for 3G Access Networks?
    • 3.4.9. Does IMS affect the Charging and Billing Strategies of Operators?

4. Analysis of IMS Demand

  • 4.1. Who are the Early Adopters of IMS?
    • 4.1.1. First to Market Operators
    • 4.1.2. Market Followers
    • 4.1.3. Fence Sitters
  • 4.2. Segmenting Operators based on their Interest in IMS
    • 4.2.1. Fixed Operators: Early Adopters of IMS
      • 4.2.1.1. Why Fixed Operators are Embracing IMS Strategy?
    • 4.2.2. Converged Operators
    • 4.2.3. Cable Operators
    • 4.2.4. Why Mobile Operators are Slow in Adopting IMS?
      • 4.2.4.1. IMS suffered from Excessive Promotion in the Embryonic Stage
      • 4.2.4.2. Mobile Operators Fear of Losing their Existing Business Model
      • 4.2.4.3. Difficulty in generating Business Case for IMS
      • 4.2.4.4. IMS is Complex to Build and Manage
      • 4.2.4.5. Non Availability of IMS Equipments based on 3GPP 8/9 Releases
      • 4.2.4.6. Non Availability of IMS Handsets
    • 4.2.5. Fixed-Network VoIP Service Providers
    • 4.2.6. Incumbents and Greenfield Operators
  • 4.3. Market Analysis
    • 4.3.1. Saturated Markets
      • 4.3.1.1. US
      • 4.3.1.2. Western Europe
    • 4.3.2. Emerging Markets
      • 4.3.2.1. India
      • 4.3.2.2. China
    • 4.3.3. Asia Pacific
  • 4.4. Facts and Figures about IMS
  • 4.5. Forecasts
    • 4.5.1. Deployments by Operator Type
  • 4.6. Market Demands for FMC
  • 4.7. Equipment Demand Analysis
    • 4.7.1. IMS Migration Timeline
  • 4.8. Analysing IMS Demand Patterns
    • 4.8.1. Economic Outlook
    • 4.8.2. Rate of Technological Change
      • 4.8.2.1. What is the Rationale for IMS Deployments?
    • 4.8.3. Political and Regulatory Developments
    • 4.8.4. Competitive Developments
    • 4.8.5. Importance of Complementary Resources
  • 4.9. Summary of IMS Demand
  • 4.10. IMS Case Studies
    • 4.10.1. AT&T
    • 4.10.2. Time Warner
    • 4.10.3. BT
    • 4.10.4. TerreStar
    • 4.10.5. Verizon Wireless
    • 4.10.6. MetroPCS
    • 4.10.7. MobilKom, Austria Group

5. How IMS Vendors can Survive Competition?

  • 5.1. IMS Value Chain
  • 5.2. IMS Infrastructure Vendors
    • 5.2.1. Ericsson
      • 5.2.1.1. Ericsson' s IMS Portfolio
      • 5.2.1.2. Ericsson' s Key Contracts
    • 5.2.2. Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN)
      • 5.2.2.1. NSN' s Recent IMS contracts
    • 5.2.3. Huawei
    • 5.2.4. Alcatel Lucent
      • 5.2.4.1. Alcatel Lucent' s IMS Customers
    • 5.2.5. ZTE
    • 5.2.6. Genband
    • 5.2.7. NEC
    • 5.2.8. MetaSwitch
  • 5.3. IMS Test and Measurement Suppliers
    • 5.3.1. Tekelec
    • 5.3.2. Celtius
    • 5.3.3. Radcom
    • 5.3.4. Radvision
    • 5.3.5. Aricent
    • 5.3.6. Starent Networks
  • 5.4. Niche Vendors
    • 5.4.1. Radisys
    • 5.4.2. Nable Communications
    • 5.4.3. Tatara Systems
    • 5.4.4. BroadSoft
    • 5.4.5. Acme Packet
    • 5.4.6. Audio Codes
    • 5.4.7. Technicolour
    • 5.4.8. Newport Network
    • 5.4.9. Iperia
    • 5.4.10. RedKnee
    • 5.4.11. BEA Systems
    • 5.4.12. ECI Telecom
    • 5.4.13. Juniper Networks
    • 5.4.14. Sonus Networks
    • 5.4.15. Comverse
    • 5.4.16. OpenCloud
  • 5.5. IMS Handset Client Vendors
    • 5.5.1. Aricent
    • 5.5.2. Nable Communications
    • 5.5.3. Radvision
    • 5.5.4. Comneon
    • 5.5.5. Ecrio
    • 5.5.6 Hello Soft
  • 5.6. Other IMS Vendors
  • 5.7. Integrators
  • 5.8. OSS/BSS Providers
  • 5.9. IMS Application Developers
  • 5.10. Competitor Dynamics in the IMS Market
  • 5.11. Market Developments in IMS Arena in 2009/2010
    • 5.11.1. IMS Contracts Signed in 2010
    • 5.11.2. Newly Launched IMS Products and Solutions
  • 5.12. How the IMS Market is Shaping Up?

6. Critical Success Factors for IMS Vendors

  • 6.1. Vendors need to make strong arguments for the commercial investment to migrate across to IMS
  • 6.2. Highlight the Changing reasons for IMS Deployments
  • 6.3. Revitalise the Market
  • 6.4. Make it Operator Driven Demand Rather than Vendor Driven
  • 6.5. Reduce the Cost of the Solution
  • 6.6. Use Clear Terminology
  • 6.7. Solve the Application Conundrum
  • 6.8. Work with Handset Vendors to solve the IMS Handset Issues
  • 6.9. Make IMS Strategic necessity for Operators by demonstrating the pitfalls of Tactical Moves
  • 6.10. Showcasing the Developments in IMS Arena
  • 6.11. Showcase how operators can remain the Final Arbiter to the Customers with IMS
  • 6.12. Develop Distinctive Capabilities and Intelligence

7. Advice for Operators

  • 7.1. Short Run Vs. Long Term Gains from IMS
  • 7.2. Best Business Model for IMS
  • 7.3. IMS Deployment Strategy
    • 7.3.1. Overlay IMS Deployment
    • 7.3.2. Single Vendor Approach
    • 7.3.3. Multiple Vendor Approach
  • 7.4. IMS Marketing Strategy
    • 7.4.1. Identify which Customer Segments to Target
      • 7.4.1.1. Enterprises Set to Benefit from IMS Services
      • 7.4.1.2. Requirements of Business Customers
      • 7.4.1.3. How Operators can Target the Business Segment?
    • 7.4.2. Mass Market for IMS
  • 7.5. The Right Choice
  • 7.6. Operator' s IMS Checklist

8. Conclusion

  • 8.1. IMS and the Telecom Value Chain
  • 8.2. IMS SWOT Analysis
  • 8.3. Recommendations for Vendors
  • 8.4. Recommendations for Operators
  • 8.5. Summary

APPENDIX

  • Appendix 1: IMS REGULATORY BODIES
  • Appendix 2: IMS PROTOCOLS
  • Appendix A: About Visiongain
  • Appendix B: Customer Feedback Form

List of Charts, Figures and Tables in the Report

  • Chart 1: RCS Market Share by Geography
  • Chart 2: RCS Customer Growth (2011-2015)
  • Chart 3: LBS Revenues (2009-2015)
  • Chart 4: Mobile VoIP subscribers (2006-2015)
  • Chart 5: PoC Subscribers Growth (2008-2015)
  • Chart 6: Mobile Video Revenues (2007-2015)
  • Chart 7: IPTV Subscriber Growth (2008-2015)
  • Chart 8: IPTV Operator Revenues (2008-2015)
  • Chart 9: LTE Subscriber Growth (2008-2015)
  • Chart 10: SIP Capable Smartphone Shipment (2015)
  • Chart 11: IMS Hosting Market Segmentation (2015)
  • Chart 12: Wireless Infrastructure Sales (2008-2015)
  • Chart 13: IMS related Managed Services (2011-2017)
  • Chart 14: SMS Messages send per year globally (2007-2010)
  • Chart 15: CapEx breakdown of a Typical Western European Operator
  • Chart 16: IMS Deployments (2010)
  • Chart 17: IMS Market Share by geography (2010)
  • Chart 18: IMS Subscribers (2007-2015)
  • Chart 19: HSS and CSCF Core sales for IMS (2010-2015) in $billion
  • Chart 20: IMS/SIP based Handset Shipment in Millions (2009-2015)
  • Chart 21: IMS Operator Revenues (2008-2015)
  • Chart 22: IMS Market Share by Operator Type (2015)
  • Chart 23: FMC Subscriber Growth (2010-2015)
  • Chart 24: Global Broadband Customers (2015)
  • Chart 25: Technology Market Share (2010)
  • Chart 26: 3G Subscriber Growth (2008-2015)
  • Chart 27: Global WCDMA/HSPA Device Shipments (2013-2015)
  • Chart 28: IMS Vendor Market Share in 2012
  • Chart 29: IMS Vendor Market Share by 2015
  • Chart 30: Operator Spending on Core IMS Equipment (2011-2015)
  • Figure 1: IMS Business Case
  • Figure 2: Quad Play Strategies
  • Figure 3: Device/User/Network/Service Convergence
  • Figure 4: IMS Horizontal Layered Architecture
  • Figure 5: Stovepipe Approach in Legacy Networks
  • Figure 6: IMS Layered Architecture
  • Figure 7: IMS Architecture and Key Components
  • Figure 8: Detailed overview of IMS Architecture
  • Figure 9: IMS Handset Client Architecture
  • Figure 10: LTE Voice Options
  • Figure 11: LTE Voice Deployment Strategies
  • Figure 12: IMS Value Chain
  • Figure 13: IMS Layers and Components within each layer
  • Figure 14: Operator Framework For Devising IMS Strategies
  • Figure 15: IMS Strategy Choices
  • Figure 16: ROI from IMS
  • Table 1: IMS Driving Forces
  • Table 2: Device, User, Network and Service Convergence
  • Table 3: IMS Enabled Services
  • Table 4: Members of One Voice Initiative
  • Table 5: IMS Architecture and Compliant Standards
  • Table 6: IMS Compatible Access Layers Technologies
  • Table 7: IMS Architecture Features
  • Table 8: IMS Delivery Proposition
  • Table 9: IMS Business Benefits
  • Table 10: Customer benefits from IMS
  • Table 11: Applications Supported by IMS
  • Table 12: Operators offering IMS compliant PTT Services
  • Table 13: IMS and Competing Technologies
  • Table 14: Softswitch Options for Operators
  • Table 15: IMS Weaknesses and Cost implications
  • Table 16: Pros and Cons of IMS
  • Table 17: IMS Market Segmentation based on Operator Type
  • Table 18: Global IMS Deployments/Contracts Signed by Operators
  • Table 19: List of FMC Operators
  • Table 20: Demand and Analysis of IMS Components
  • Table 21: Summary of IMS Demand
  • Table 22: IMS Vendors and their positioning
  • Table 23: Top IMS Vendors and their strategies
  • Table 24: IMS Gateway Vendors and their Strategies
  • Table 25: Application Server Vendors and their Strategies
  • Table 26: Top IMS Vendor and their Rankings
  • Table 27: Critical Success Factors Evaluation
  • Table 28: IMS Proposition for End Users
  • Table 29: Critical Questions to be considered before IMS Deployment
  • Table 30: Benchmarking Guidelines for IMS
  • Table 31: Formulating an IMS Strategy
  • Table 32: SWOT Analysis

Companies Listed

  • 3GPP
  • 3GPP2
  • Accenture
  • Acme Packet
  • Alcatel Lucent
  • Aricent
  • ArmenTel
  • AT&T
  • Audio Codes
  • BEA
  • Beijing Netcom
  • Bouygues Telecom
  • Brazil Telecom
  • Bridgeport Networks
  • Broadsoft
  • BT
  • Cable & Wireless
  • China Mobile
  • China Telecom (China)
  • China Unicom
  • Chunghwa Telecom
  • Cisco
  • Colibria
  • Comneon
  • Connect2 Media
  • Convedia
  • Dialogic
  • Ecrio
  • Eircom
  • Ericsson
  • ETSI
  • FarEasTone
  • France Telecom
  • Fujian Telecoms
  • Fujitsu
  • Genband
  • Globe (Philippines)
  • Google
  • GSMA
  • Hello Soft
  • HP
  • Huawei
  • IBM
  • Intel
  • ITU
  • Juniper Networks
  • KDDI
  • Kineto Wireless
  • Korea Telecom
  • KPN
  • KT
  • KTF
  • LG
  • LG Electronics
  • Lucent
  • Manx Telecom
  • Mavenir
  • MegaFon(Russia)
  • Metaswitch
  • Microsoft
  • Mitsubishi
  • Mobilkom Austria
  • Mobitel, Slovenia
  • Motorola
  • Movial
  • MSF
  • MSV
  • NEC
  • NetCentrex
  • Neuf Telecom
  • Neustar
  • Nexos
  • NMS
  • Nokia
  • Nokia Siemens Networks
  • Orange
  • Panasonic
  • Quanta Computers
  • Radcom
  • RadiSys
  • Radvision Convedia
  • Samsung
  • Sanyo
  • SBC
  • Seven
  • SFR
  • Sharp
  • Siemens
  • Singtel (Singapore)
  • SK Telecom
  • Skype
  • Sony Ericsson
  • Tata Indicom, India
  • Technicolour
  • Tekelec
  • Telefonica
  • Telenor, Norway
  • TeliaSonera
  • Time Warner
  • Turk Telecom
  • Verizon (USA)
  • Verizon Wireless
  • Virgin Media
  • Vivatel(Bulgaria)
  • Vivo
  • Vodafone Germany
  • Vodafone, Ireland
  • Vodafone, Portugal
  • Vonage
  • Wanadoo
  • Warid Telecoms
  • Zain(Saudi Arabia)
  • ZTE
Back to Top