無料レポート プレゼントキャンペーン 実施中 : メールサービスに新規登録いただいた方にご用意した無料レポートをご提供

株式会社グローバルインフォメーション
TEL: 044-952-0102
表紙
市場調査レポート

電気自動車向け電気モーター:2018年〜2028年

Electric Motors for Electric Vehicles 2018-2028

発行 IDTechEx Ltd. 商品コード 408659
出版日 ページ情報 英文 287 Pages
納期: 即日から翌営業日
価格
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=114.61円で換算しております。
Back to Top
電気自動車向け電気モーター:2018年〜2028年 Electric Motors for Electric Vehicles 2018-2028
出版日: 2018年04月30日 ページ情報: 英文 287 Pages
概要

世界における電気モーターシステムの市場規模は、2028年にはおよそ4,800億米ドルに達すると予測されています。

当レポートでは、電気自動車向けトラクションモーター市場について包括的に調査し、市場の概要、主要動向、技術、48Vマイルドハイブリッド、純電気自動車向け電気モーター、およびトラクションモーターメーカー170社の分析などを提供しています。

第1章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第2章 イントロダクション

  • トラクションモーター技術の選択
  • パワートレインにおける回転電気機械
  • 1台あたり2台以上のREMの動向
  • 製品統合の動向
  • 強力なハイブリッド、純電気自動車における高電圧、高速モーターの動向
  • フライホイール式KERS (運動エネルギー回生システム)
  • サプライチェーンにおける垂直統合の動向
  • モーター制御、ほか

第3章 トラクションモーターのオフロード:建設、農業、鉱業、軍事、船舶

  • オンロードとは異なるニーズ
  • 電化の新興
  • 電気ドライブ・標準化の動向
  • 多くのトラクションモーターの機会を有するオフロード車両のサイズ
  • 全く異なるトラクションモーターソリューションを有するホイールローダー
  • 農業用トラクター:John Deere
  • Oerlikon の大型ハイブリッドにおけるSRモーター、ほか

第4章 48VマイルドハイブリッドBSG、ISG:軍事車両、小型商用車、トラック

  • なぜ48Vなのか?
  • 48Vマイルドハイブリッドが適合する場所
  • モチベーション
  • 48Vマイルドハイブリッドシステム技術
  • CPT例
  • ストップスタートから多機能回転機械への進化
  • 自動車向け最新フォームにおける48Vマイルドハイブリッドの作り方
  • システムオプションの主要コンポーネントはほとんど異なる、ほか

第5章 強力ハイブリッド向け電気モーター、モーター発電機

  • 相対的ニーズ
  • プラグインの選択肢
  • 高性能/大型車両におけるプラグインハイブリッドの可能性
  • Teslaの電気トラクションモーターへのアプローチ
  • 将来におけるパラレルハイブリッドの有用性についての異なる見解:Siemens, Ricardo 、ほか

第6章 純電気自動車向け電気モーター、モーター発電機

  • 最終段階
  • 純電気自動車向け電圧の動向
  • 多種多様
  • 純電気自動車および類似の自動車
  • UAVおよびマルチコプター
  • Dysonのロボット掃除機
  • エネルギー自律型自動車 (EIV) 、ほか

第7章 インタビュー例

第8章 トラクションモーターメーカー170社の分析

目次

Title:
Electric Motors for Electric Vehicles 2018-2028
Traction motors, motor generators, boost recuperation machines, BSG, ISG for 48V MH, strong hybrid, pure electric, EIV: land, water, air.

"Electric motor systems will become a market of about $480 billion in 2028, more than batteries"

Electric Motors for Electric Vehicles: $400 Billion Confusion

What do golf cars and heavy electric trucks have in common? There is still no agreement on the best type of electric motor to use in either of them. On IDTechEx analysis, the booming, confusing traction motor business will rise to around $480 billion in 2028. Its new report, "Electric Motors for Electric Vehicles 2018-2028" navigates the jargon, the design options and, yes, the disagreement. The changing needs and evolving technology are matched to create forecasts and technology timelines based on intensive recent travel and interviews by PhD level analysts.

Rotating electric machines REM propel electric vehicles at least some all of the time by land, water and air. In a hybrid the motor may sometimes have to run hotter due to hot engine systems nearby and tougher duty cycles. This affects motor design as do cost-performance compromises for the very different duty cycles and environments experienced by vehicles land, water and air. Off-road vehicle REMs are very different from on-road. The second most expensive part of an EV after the energy storage is typically the REM system including its intimately related motor controller.

The report reveals how the REM system is taking a larger share of cost over the years as simpler batteries reduce in cost. By contrast, REM systems are variously being asked to grab regenerative energy, eliminate transmission, provide better speed/ torque characteristics and even form part of the structure such as tucked into the wheel with brake and controller. In hybrids add takeoff. Creeping and active cruising with engine off and start and boost the engine. Crucially, in addition to becoming motor-generators, more REMs are being used per vehicle for reasons explained in the report which has in-wheel forecasts for that form of multi-motor.

"Electric Motors for Electric Vehicles 2018-2028" reports that, increasingly, the choice of REM system benefits the unique selling propositions of the vehicle. Where it eliminates the need for a gearbox it can increase range 15%. Extreme power-to-weight ratio REMs are sought for most vehicles.

A pure- electric heavy construction vehicle with several quiet REMs appropriately placed may have vectored traction so it can cross roads without damaging them and be legally used indoors and at night time as needed. It may operate implements with improved precision and response time and create electricity instead of heat when the vehicle or the implements brake. Start-stop is smoother. Emissions, acceleration, ride, fuel consumption and autonomy of navigation and energy are improved with better REMs. Emissions are reduced or eliminated. There are chapters on how this all fits in with all vehicles, the technology being fully explained.

New business opportunities, new skills

Mechanical parts are rapidly becoming replaced by electrical and electronic ones, creating many new business opportunities. For instance there is a shortage of good designers of motor controllers. The variety of EVs is becoming greater so we now have special coreless motors for the multi-billion dollar market for drones that has arrived from nowhere. Small agricultural robots are being contemplated for agriculture: "elephants to ants" that will change completely the type of REM system required. The new robots mining at the bottom of the sea call for something else completely. The basics are explained from P0 to P4 REM positioning to the merits and popularity of design options from asynchronous to PM, SWM, BSG, ISG and more. Future popularity of in-wheel vs near-wheel and inboard? Axial vs radial flux? It is all here with a full listing of traction REM manufacturers and their typical offerings.

The report even analyses 48V mild hybrid motor-generators as well because later versions of these cars, light commercial vehicles and trucks will have brief electric traction modes. They are the lowest cost way of modifying internal combustion vehicle production to stay legal under impending carbon dioxide emissions laws and they give useful fuel saving but the REM is challenging.

Ten important trends receive particular attention: Multifunction. Proliferation. Integration. Power increase. Voltage increase. Less metal/ more electronics. New technology preferences. Changed location. Less cooling.

It is not all confusing. Quadcopters nearly all have an outrunner PM REM and forklifts are largely hooked on asynchronous motors. Sense is made of the rest through infograms, roadmaps and forecasts.

Analyst access from IDTechEx

All report purchases include up to 30 minutes telephone time with an expert analyst who will help you link key findings in the report to the business issues you're addressing. This needs to be used within three months of purchasing the report.

Table of Contents

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

  • 1.1. Focus of this report, primary trends, opportunities
    • 1.1.1. Ten important trends
    • 1.1.2. Value chain severely disrupted
    • 1.1.3. Great improvements in traction motors with their controls are both needed and possible
  • 1.2. Example of multiple REM per vehicle
    • 1.2.1. Examples of manned electric aircraft with multiple drive motors
    • 1.2.2. The race for lightweight electric aircraft motors
    • 1.2.3. Examples of trend to product integration
  • 1.3. Powertrain focus
  • 1.4. Motor-generator REM duty cycle, type, function
  • 1.5. Motor-generator REM improvements needed, number of manufacturers/ developers
  • 1.6. REM technology
    • 1.6.1. Choices
    • 1.6.2. Technology preference by type of vehicle
  • 1.7. Market forecasts
    • 1.7.1. Type of powertrain for 46 types of electric vehicle
    • 1.7.2. In wheel motors vs near wheel motors
    • 1.7.3. In-wheel motor global market for vehicles with four or more wheels units million 2018-2028
  • 1.8. Powertrain forecasts by 46 types of electric vehicle
  • 1.9. Electric traction motor and vehicle forecasts 2018-2028
  • 1.10. Market size 2018-2028 for electric vehicles and 48V mild hybrid cars (non-EV and EV form) - number (thousand)
  • 1.11. Rapidly increasing market for powertrain REMs for electric vehicles
  • 1.12. Voltage trends alter REM design
  • 1.13. Permanent magnet price concern and investment trend
    • 1.13.1. Neodymium price hikes
    • 1.13.2. Neodymium-reduced, heat-resistant EV motor magnet: Toyota
    • 1.13.3. Hitachi Metals $172 million magnet investment by 2018
    • 1.13.4. New approach to motor inverters
    • 1.13.5. Techrules of China
    • 1.13.6. BMW EV motor patent 2017
    • 1.13.7. Alcraft three motor vehicle
  • 1.14. Deutz acquires Torqeedo, September 2017
  • 1.15. GM patent electric traction motor, January 2018

2. INTRODUCTION

  • 2.1. Jargon buster
    • 2.1.1. Innovation often first with large motors
  • 2.2. Traction motor technology choices
    • 2.2.1. Super efficient PM motor drives most economical EV
    • 2.2.2. Siemens 260 kW electric aircraft motor makes first public flight
    • 2.2.3. Premium pure electric cars with PM motors in 2017
  • 2.3. Rotating electrical machines in powertrain
    • 2.3.1. Needs by type of powertrain
    • 2.3.2. Heart of a first generation 48V mild hybrid: BSG
    • 2.3.3. Belt drive and integrated starter generators for 48V mild hybrids
    • 2.3.4. Example of reversible rotating machine for 48V mild hybrid: Bosch "E-Machine"
    • 2.3.5. REM technologies performance in powertrains: the show so far
    • 2.3.6. Axial flux may increase its tiny market share? Axial Flux Traction Motor With 15% Advantage Taiwan
    • 2.3.7. Toyota: Big Gains from Downsizing PM Motor models
  • 2.4. One business land, water, air - hybrid and pure electric
  • 2.5. Trend to two or more REM per vehicle
    • 2.5.1. Reasons
    • 2.5.2. Innovative two motor formats: car, motorcycle
    • 2.5.3. Xtrac's new EV transmission system features dual motors with torque vectoring
    • 2.5.4. Efficiency gains of distributed drive
    • 2.5.5. Two-motor mopeds and motorcycles
    • 2.5.6. Performance motorcycle goes asynchronous
  • 2.6. Trend to product integration
    • 2.6.1. Strong hybrid cars
    • 2.6.2. Volkswagen approach to device integration
    • 2.6.3. Integration challenges of simulation of electric machines and inverters
    • 2.6.4. 48V mild hybrid integrated starter generators
    • 2.6.5. Two types of in-wheel motor
    • 2.6.6. In-wheel motors by size of vehicle, with examples, benefits sought and challenges.
    • 2.6.7. Example - Rinspeed Oasis with ZF in-wheel
    • 2.6.8. So why are in-wheel motors always going to be successful next year?
  • 2.7. Trend to high voltage, high speed motors in strong hybrids, pure electric vehicles
  • 2.8. Flywheel KERS
    • 2.8.1. Flybrid KERS used by Wrightbus UK on hybrid buses
  • 2.9. Trend to vertical integration in supply chain
  • 2.10. Motor Controls
    • 2.10.1. Overview
    • 2.10.2. Cost and integration issues
    • 2.10.3. New materials in switched reluctance EV motor
  • 2.11. Example: How EVDrive selects and uses traction motors
  • 2.12. Rectangular wire preferred

3. TRACTION MOTORS OFF-ROAD: CONSTRUCTION, AGRICULTURE, MINING, MILITARY, MARINE

  • 3.1. Needs are different from on-road
  • 3.2. Progression of electrification
  • 3.3. Trend to electric drive and standardisation
  • 3.4. Sizes of off-road vehicles with many traction motor opportunities
  • 3.5. Wheel loaders with very different traction motor solutions
    • 3.5.1. Huddig hybrid near wheel
    • 3.5.2. Kramer 5055e asynchronous
    • 3.5.3. LeTourneau switched reluctance
  • 3.6. Agricultural tractor John Deere
  • 3.7. Oerlikon SR motor in large hybrids
  • 3.8. Planned PM synchronous heavy duty drive UQM, Eaton,Pi Innovo
  • 3.9. Dana in-axle motor
  • 3.10. Ship propulsion motors PM synchronous and asynchronous

4. 48V MILD HYBRID: LARGE MARKET EMERGING, SOME DUAL MACHINE

  • 4.1. The Terminology
  • 4.2. Example of belt drive and integrated
  • 4.3. Typical options of repositioning
  • 4.4. Typical rewards from repositioning
  • 4.5. Mercedes-Benz approach - belt and integrated options
  • 4.6. Roll out
    • 4.6.1. Renault Scenic
    • 4.6.2. Skoda
  • 4.7. Operating principle of 48V motor generators
  • 4.8. A synchronous permanent magnet option for 48V
  • 4.9. Claw Pole
  • 4.10. Bosch e machine

5. ELECTRIC MOTORS, MOTOR-GENERATORS FOR STRONG HYBRIDS

  • 5.1. Relative needs
  • 5.2. Plug in option
  • 5.3. Plug in hybrid potential in higher performance/ heavy vehicles
  • 5.4. The Tesla approach to electric traction motors
  • 5.5. Motor history to Tesla Model 3
  • 5.6. Comparisons
  • 5.7. Interview
  • 5.8. Different views on usefulness of parallel hybrids in future: Siemens, Ricardo
  • 5.9. Siemens typical hybrid system components based on automotive standard TS 16949
  • 5.10. Ricardo view of long haul options
  • 5.11. GKN advances
  • 5.12. GE Aviation and Hybrid Electronic Propulsion
  • 5.13. Roundup

6. ELECTRIC MOTORS, MOTOR-GENERATORS FOR PURE ELECTRIC VEHICLES

  • 6.1. The end game
  • 6.2. Voltage trends for pure electric vehicles
  • 6.3. Great variety
    • 6.3.1. Nanoflowcell 48V premium cars
  • 6.4. Pure electric cars and similar vehicles
    • 6.4.1. Another Maverick: SynchR
  • 6.5. UAVs and multicopters
    • 6.5.1. REMs
    • 6.5.2. Outrunner motors for manned aircraft
    • 6.5.3. Drive electronics
  • 6.6. Dyson robot vacuum cleaner
  • 6.7. Energy Independent Vehicles EIV
    • 6.7.1. Why we want more than mechanical energy independence
    • 6.7.2. Energy Independent Vehicles: definition and function
    • 6.7.3. The EIV powertrain for land vehicles
    • 6.7.4. EIV operational choices
    • 6.7.5. Do not forget wind
    • 6.7.6. Key EIV technologies
    • 6.7.7. Stella Lux passenger car Netherlands
    • 6.7.8. Solar racer derivative: Immortus passenger car EIV Australia
    • 6.7.9. POLYMODEL micro EV Italy
    • 6.7.10. Lizard EIV wakes with the sun: NFH-H microbus China
    • 6.7.11. Visedo PowerDRUM Finland

7. INTERVIEWS

  • 7.1. Ongoing interviews by IDTechEx USA, East Asia, Europe
  • 7.2. Interviews with Professor Pietro Perlo
  • 7.3. Elaphe Slovenia
  • 7.4. Protean Electric UK
    • 7.4.1. Protean update
  • 7.5. ALABC/ILA London
  • 7.6. MAHLE
  • 7.7. Controlled Power Technologies

8. ANALYSIS OF 170 TRACTION MOTOR MANUFACTURERS

Back to Top