お知らせ :東京証券取引所JASDAQスタンダード市場への新規上場に関するお知らせ
株式会社グローバルインフォメーション
表紙:LSO - 見通しと課題:ネットワークアプリケーションオーケストレーター市場
市場調査レポート
商品コード
762450

LSO - 見通しと課題:ネットワークアプリケーションオーケストレーター市場

LSO - Prospects and Challenges: The Market for Network Application Orchestrators 2019-2025

出版日: | 発行: Insight Research Corporation | ページ情報: 英文 90 Pages; 10 Tables; 21 Figures | 納期: 即日から翌営業日

価格
価格表記: USDを日本円(税抜)に換算
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=110.15円
LSO - 見通しと課題:ネットワークアプリケーションオーケストレーター市場
出版日: 2019年09月27日
発行: Insight Research Corporation
ページ情報: 英文 90 Pages; 10 Tables; 21 Figures
納期: 即日から翌営業日
  • 全表示
  • 概要
  • 目次
概要

ライフサイクルサービスオーケストレーション (LSO) は、「準備を怠ることは失敗を準備することである」という非常に単純な前提を有しています。

当レポートでは、LSOに関わる課題について検証し、LSOソリューション市場の予測も含めて、体系的な情報を提供しています。

第1章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第2章 導入とフレームワーク

  • 定義
  • 重要な用語
  • LSOの必要性
  • LSOの進化
  • ユースケースと抽象化のアプローチ
  • 参照アーキテクチャ
  • 管理インターフェースの基準点

第3章 課題とアプローチ

  • 課題の概要
  • LSOの要点
  • ベンダーのアプローチ
  • 徹底的に
  • Anuta
  • Netcracker
  • インターフェイスの強化
  • Amartus
  • 借りを返す
  • Cataworx

第4章 ステークホルダーと企業プロファイル

  • 概要
  • Accedian
  • Adva Optical
  • Amdocs
  • Ciena
  • Cisco
  • Clear Blockchain
  • DGIT Systems
  • Cloudify
  • ECI Telecom
  • Ericsson
  • 富士通
  • Huawei
  • Infinera
  • LB Networks
  • Nokia
  • RAD
  • Sandvine Technologies
  • Spirent Communications
  • Zeetta Networks

第5章 Telcoのイニシアティブ

  • MEF LSOの方へ
  • Allstream
  • AT&T
  • Bell Canada
  • BringCom
  • CBCcom
  • CenturyLink
  • Colt Business
  • Comcast Business
  • Cox Business
  • Equinix
  • Infonas
  • Liquid Telecom
  • Orange
  • PCCW Global
  • Singtel
  • Sparkle
  • Spectrum Enterprise
  • Sprint
  • Tata Communications
  • TDS Telecom
  • Telstra
  • Telus
  • Verizon
  • Vodafone

第6章 市場予測

  • 調査手法
  • 内訳:ソリューションタイプ別
  • 内訳:地域別
  • 内訳:Telcoタイプ別

第7章 用語集と略語

目次
Product Code: LSO19

Lifecycle Service Orchestration (LSO) has a very straightforward premise - "Failing to prepare is the same as preparing to fail"

LSO is saddled with the expectation of being a master entity that will orchestrate end-to-end applications traversing multiple service provider domains and customer infrastructure. This is a tall ask, by any stretch. MEF has been diligently working towards putting LSO together - piece-by-piece, or shall we say interface-by-interface.

To be sure, LSO is not the only initiative in the market. Individual vendors have attempted to address the demands of network application orchestration in their own manner. What these standalone vendor products lack is a surefire way of establishing network applications beyond the borders of the domain of the given telco. MEF, through LSO is taking firm steps towards achieving this objective.

This report will look at the challenges involved in bringing LSO to shape and forecast the addressable LSO solutions market. The report will also answer some questions that are at the top of every stakeholder's recall:

  • What is the market size of LSO and other network application orchestrators?
  • What will the telco response to LSO and other network application orchestratorsbe ?
  • What shape will LSO and other network application orchestrators acquire?
  • Will LSO tread on the shoes of SDN, NFV, OSS and BSS technologies?
  • What are the prospects of individual LSO interfaces?

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

  • 1.1. Orchestrators and Orchestrators
  • 1.2. Market Taxonomy
  • 1.3. Report Organization

2. Prelude and Framework

  • 2.1. Definition
  • 2.2. Important Terms
    • 2.2.1. SDN
    • 2.2.2. NFV
    • 2.2.3. Containers and Microservices
    • 2.2.4. SD-WAN
    • 2.2.5. Carrier Ethernet
    • 2.2.6. MEF 3.0
  • 2.3. Need for LSO
    • 2.3.1. Monolithic OSS BSS
    • 2.3.2. Limited Interfaces
    • 2.3.3. Ad-Hoc Network Partner Relationships and Slow Application Rollouts
    • 2.3.4. OTT Challenges
    • 2.3.5. Lost Opportunities
  • 2.4. Evolution of LSO
  • 2.5. Use-Cases and Abstraction Approaches
    • 2.5.1. Operation Threads
    • 2.5.2. Views and Abstraction
  • 2.6. Reference Architecture
    • 2.6.1. Customer Domain
      • 2.6.1.1. Customer Application Co-ordinator (CUS)
    • 2.6.2. Service Provider (SP) and Partner Domains
      • 2.6.2.1. Business Application (BUS)
      • 2.6.2.2. Service Orchestration Functionality (SOF)
      • 2.6.2.3. Infrastructure Control and Management (ICM)
      • 2.6.2.4. Element Control and Management (ECM)
  • 2.7. Management Interface Reference Points
    • 2.7.1. Cantata
      • 2.7.1.1. Functional Description
      • 2.7.1.2. Status and Prospects
    • 2.7.2. Allegro
      • 2.7.2.1. Functional Description
      • 2.7.2.2. Status and Prospects
    • 2.7.3. Legato
      • 2.7.3.1. Functional Description
      • 2.7.3.2. Status and Prospects
    • 2.7.4. Sonata
      • 2.7.4.1. Functional Description
      • 2.7.4.2. Status and Prospects
    • 2.7.5. Interlude
      • 2.7.5.1. Functional Description
      • 2.7.5.2. Status and Prospects
    • 2.7.6. Presto
      • 2.7.6.1. Functional Description
      • 2.7.6.2. Status and Prospects
    • 2.7.7. Adagio
      • 2.7.7.1. Functional Description
      • 2.7.7.2. Status and Prospects

3. Challenges and Approaches

  • 3.1. Overview of Challenges
    • 3.1.1. All-encompassing Scope
    • 3.1.2. Excessive Hierarchy
    • 3.1.3. Overlap with Contemporary Technologies
    • 3.1.4. Lack of Clarity
  • 3.2. The Gist of LSO
  • 3.3. Vendor Approaches
  • 3.4. Going the Whole Hog
  • 3.5. Anuta
    • 3.5.1. Atom
    • 3.5.2. Charting Independent Path
  • 3.6. Netcracker
    • 3.6.1. Solid Pedigree
    • 3.6.2. Service Orchestrator
  • 3.7. Bolstering the Interfaces
  • 3.8. Amartus
    • 3.8.1. Standards-based API
    • 3.8.2. Initiatives with LSO
  • 3.9. Settling Scores
  • 3.10. Cataworx
    • 3.10.1. AI-based Approach
    • 3.10.2. Initiatives with LSO

4. Stakeholder and Company Profiles

  • 4.1. High-level Overview
  • 4.2. Accedian
    • 4.2.1. Network Application Orchestration Offerings
  • 4.3. Adva Optical
    • 4.3.1. Network Application Orchestration Offerings
  • 4.4. Amdocs
    • 4.4.1. Network Application Orchestration Offerings
  • 4.5. Ciena
    • 4.5.1. Network Application Orchestration Offerings
  • 4.6. Cisco
    • 4.6.1. Network Application Orchestration Offerings
  • 4.7. Clear Blockchain
    • 4.7.1. Network Application Orchestration Offerings
  • 4.8. DGIT Systems
    • 4.8.1. Network Application Orchestration Offerings
  • 4.9. Cloudify
    • 4.9.1. Network Application Orchestration Offerings
  • 4.10. ECI Telecom
    • 4.10.1. Network Application Orchestration Offerings
  • 4.11. Ericsson
    • 4.11.1. Network Application Orchestration Offerings
  • 4.12. Fujitsu
    • 4.12.1. Network Application Orchestration Offerings
  • 4.13. Huawei
    • 4.13.1. Network Application Orchestration Offerings
  • 4.14. Infinera
    • 4.14.1. Network Application Orchestration Offerings
  • 4.15. LB Networks
    • 4.15.1. Network Application Orchestration Offerings
  • 4.16. Nokia
    • 4.16.1. Network Application Orchestration Offerings
  • 4.17. RAD
    • 4.17.1. Network Application Orchestration Offerings
  • 4.18. Sandvine Technologies
    • 4.18.1. Network Application Orchestration Offerings
  • 4.19. Spirent Communications
    • 4.19.1. Network Application Orchestration Offerings
  • 4.20. Zeetta Networks
    • 4.20.1. Network Application Orchestration Offerings

5. Telco Initiatives

  • 5.1. The Slant towards MEF LSO
  • 5.2. Allstream
  • 5.3. AT&T
  • 5.4. Bell Canada
  • 5.5. BringCom
  • 5.6. CBCcom
  • 5.7. CenturyLink
  • 5.8. Colt Business
  • 5.9. Comcast Business
  • 5.10. Cox Business
  • 5.11. Equinix
  • 5.12. Infonas
  • 5.13. Liquid Telecom
  • 5.14. Orange
  • 5.15. PCCW Global
  • 5.16. Singtel
  • 5.17. Sparkle
  • 5.18. Spectrum Enterprise
  • 5.19. Sprint
  • 5.20. Tata Communications
  • 5.21. TDS Telecom
  • 5.22. Telstra
  • 5.23. Telus
  • 5.24. Verizon
  • 5.25. Vodafone

6. Market Forecasts

  • 6.1. Research Methodology
  • 6.2. Breakdown by Solution Type
    • 6.2.1. Orchestrator Framework
    • 6.2.2. Interfaces
  • 6.3. Breakdown by Geography
    • 6.3.1. North America
    • 6.3.2. Europe, Middle East and Africa
    • 6.3.3. Asia Pacific
    • 6.3.4. Caribbean and Latin America
  • 6.4. Breakdown by Telco Type
    • 6.4.1. Wireline Telcos
    • 6.4.2. Wireless Telcos

7. Glossary and Acronyms

株式会社グローバルインフォメーション
© Copyright 1996-2021, Global Information, Inc. All rights reserved.