株式会社グローバルインフォメーション
TEL: 044-952-0102
表紙
市場調査レポート

整形外科外傷治療装置の世界市場:2016年〜2020年

Global Orthopedic Trauma Devices Market 2016-2020

発行 TechNavio (Infiniti Research Ltd.) 商品コード 348013
出版日 ページ情報 英文 66 Pages
即納可能
価格
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=114.81円で換算しております。
Back to Top
整形外科外傷治療装置の世界市場:2016年〜2020年 Global Orthopedic Trauma Devices Market 2016-2020
出版日: 2015年12月23日 ページ情報: 英文 66 Pages
概要

世界の整形外科外傷治療装置市場は、2015年〜2020年のCAGRで、6.56%の成長が見込まれています。

当レポートでは、世界の整形外科外傷治療装置市場について調査分析し、市場規模と成長率、市場動向、市場促進要因・課題、市場機会について検証するほか、主要ベンダーなどについて、体系的な情報を提供しています。

第1章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第2章 調査範囲

  • 市場概要
  • 主要ベンダー製品

第3章 市場調査手法

  • 調査手法
  • 経済指標

第4章 イントロダクション

  • 主な市場ハイライト

第5章 市場情勢

  • 市場概要
  • 市場規模と予測
  • ファイブフォース分析

第6章 市場区分:材料の種類別

  • 金属
  • 非金属

第7章 市場区分:固定の種類別

  • 内部固定
  • 外部固定

第8章 製品パイプライン分析

第9章 地理区分

  • 地理区分別
  • 南北アメリカ
  • 欧州・中東・アフリカ
  • アジア太平洋地域

第10章 市場促進要因

第11章 促進要因の影響

第12章 市場の課題

第13章 促進要因と課題の影響

第14章 市場動向

第15章 ベンダー情勢

  • 競合シナリオ
  • 市場シェア分析
  • その他の有力ベンダー

第16章 主要ベンダー分析

  • DePuy Synthes Companies
  • Stryker
  • Smith & Nephew
  • Zimmer Holding

第17章 付録

  • 略語リスト

第18章 Technavioについて

図表

目次
Product Code: IRTNTR7703

Market outlook of the orthopedic trauma devices market

Trauma includes severe damage to functional body components such as soft tissues, bones, nerves, and vessels. It is usually caused by an external cause such as road accidents, and major damage can lead to severe outcomes. According to WHO, every year 9% of mortality is caused because of trauma injuries across the globe. Technavio's market research analysts estimate the global orthopedic trauma devices market to grow successfully and post a CAGR of more than 6% during the forecast period.

High prevalence of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis in the elderly population (aged 60 and above) is one of the major factors influencing the growth of the market. The aging population being more prone towards joint-related complications will increase the demand for trauma devices, thereby contributing to market growth during the forecast period. Osteoarthritis is the most common joint problem in developed countries such as the US and the UK.

Segmentation by material and analysis of - metals and non-metals

The non-metals that are most commonly used in the orthopedic trauma devices are polymers, ceramics, and composites. The use of natural polymers such as collagen, fibrin, and hyaluronic acid have resulted in good biocompatibility and osteoconductive properties. Even though these materials have low mechanical stability they are used as scaffolds for tissue engineering.

The report offers an analysis of each of the following segments and discusses its impact on the overall market growth -

  • Metals
  • Non-metals

Geographical segmentation and analysis of - Americas, APAC, EMEA

Technavio's market research analysts have evaluated the Americas as the major revenue contributor to the orthopedic trauma devices market, with the US and Canada being major countries contributing to the market share. The market in the Americas will see a steady growth because the third-party payers, including domestic dealers, government, and private health insurers limit reimbursement and healthcare coverage resulting in decreased sales of new products.

The report offers an analysis of each of the following segments and discusses its impact on the overall market growth -

  • Americas
  • APAC
  • EMEA

Competitive landscape and key vendors - DePuy Synthes, Smith & Nephew, Zimmer Holding, and Stryker

The orthopedic trauma devices market is dominated by few large players and the competition among these players in the market is intense about innovation and launch of new products. Therefore, forming strategic alliances among vendors will help in penetration of a product in untapped markets as well as expansion of product portfolio and increased product sales, thus gaining substantial market shares.

The top vendors in this market are -

  • DePuy Synthes
  • Smith & Nephew
  • Zimmer Holding
  • Stryker

Other prominent vendors included in this report are AAP Implantate, Acumed, Arthrex, Arthrosurface, Cardinal Health, Ellipse Technologies, Flower Orthopedics, Orthopaedic Innovation, Medartis, Nextremity, Solutions, Osteomed, Paragon 28, Skeletal Dynamics, Tornier, Tyber Medical, Virak Orthopedic, and Wright Medical.

Key questions answered in the report include

  • What will the market size and the growth rate be in 2020?
  • What are the key factors driving the global orthopedic trauma devices market?
  • What are the key market trends impacting the growth of the global orthopedic trauma devices market?
  • What are the challenges to market growth?
  • Who are the key vendors in the global orthopedic trauma devices?
  • What are the market opportunities and threats faced by the vendors in the global orthopedic trauma devices?
  • What are the trending factors influencing the market shares of the APAC, EMEA, and the Americas?
  • What are the key outcomes of the five forces analysis of the global orthopedic trauma devices?

Technavio also offers customization on reports based on specific client requirement.

Table of Contents

PART 01: Executive summary

  • Highlights

PART 02: Scope of the report

  • Market overview
  • Top vendor offerings

PART 03: Market research methodology

  • Research methodology
  • Economic indicators

PART 04: Introduction

  • Key market highlights

PART 05: Market landscape

  • Market overview
  • Market size and forecast
  • Five forces analysis

PART 06: Market segmentation by material type

  • Metals
  • Non-metals

PART 07: Market segmentation by fixation type

  • Internal fixation
  • External fixation

PART 08: Product pipeline analysis

PART 09: Geographical segmentation

  • Orthopedic trauma devices market by geographical segmentation 2015-2020
  • Orthopedic trauma devices market in Americas
  • Orthopaedic trauma devices market in EMEA
  • Orthopedic trauma devices market in APAC

PART 10: Market drivers

PART 11: Impact of drivers

PART 12: Market challenges

PART 13: Impact of drivers and challenges

PART 14: Market trends

PART 15: Vendor landscape

  • Competitive scenario
  • Market share analysis 2015
  • Other prominent vendors

PART 16: Key vendor analysis

  • DePuy Synthes Companies
  • Stryker
  • Smith & Nephew
  • Zimmer Holding

PART 17: Appendix

PART 18: Explore Technavio

List of Exhibits

  • Exhibit 01: Product offerings
  • Exhibit 02: Global orthopedic trauma devices market
  • Exhibit 03: Global orthopedic trauma devices market 2015-2020 ($ billions)
  • Exhibit 04: Five forces analysis
  • Exhibit 05: Segmentation of global orthopedic trauma devices market by material type
  • Exhibit 06: Segmentation of global orthopedic trauma devices market by material type 2015
  • Exhibit 07: Segmentation of global orthopedic trauma devices by fixation type
  • Exhibit 08: Global internal fixation orthopedic trauma devices market 2015-2020 ($ billions)
  • Exhibit 09: Global external fixation orthopedic trauma devices market 2015-2020 ($ billions)
  • Exhibit 10: Segmentation of global orthopedic trauma devices market by fixation type 2015
  • Exhibit 11: Segmentation of global orthopedic trauma devices market by fixation type 2020
  • Exhibit 12: Segmentation of orthopedic trauma devices market by fixation type 2015-2020
  • Exhibit 13: Pipeline snapshot of orthopedic trauma devices
  • Exhibit 14: Segmentation of orthopedic trauma devices market by geography 2015
  • Exhibit 15: Segmentation of orthopedic trauma devices market by geography 2020
  • Exhibit 16: Segmentation of orthopedic trauma devices market by geography 2015-2020
  • Exhibit 17: Orthopedic trauma devices market in the Americas 2015-2020 ($ billions)
  • Exhibit 18: Orthopedic trauma devices market in EMEA 2015-2020 ($ billions)
  • Exhibit 19: Orthopedic trauma devices market in APAC 2015-2020 ($ billions)
  • Exhibit 20: Impact of drivers
  • Exhibit 21: Impact of drivers and challenges
  • Exhibit 22: Market share of top vendors 2015
  • Exhibit 23: DePuy Synthes: Key takeaways
  • Exhibit 24: Stryker: Key takeaways
  • Exhibit 25: Smith & Nephew: Key takeaways
  • Exhibit 26: Zimmer Biomet: Key takeaways
  • Exhibit 27: Stryker: Business/product segmentation by revenue 2014
  • Exhibit 28: Stryker: Business segmentation by revenue 2013 and 2014 ($ millions)
  • Exhibit 29: Smith & Nephew: Business segmentation by revenue 2014
  • Exhibit 30: Smith & Nephew: Business segmentation by revenue 2013 and 2014
  • Exhibit 31: Smith & Nephew: Geographical segmentation by revenue 2014
  • Exhibit 32: Advanced surgical devices segmentation by revenue 2014
  • Exhibit 33: Zimmer Holding: Business segmentation by revenue 2014
  • Exhibit 34: Zimmer Holding: Business segmentation by revenue 2013 and 2014 ($ millions)
  • Exhibit 35: Zimmer Holding: Geographical segmentation by revenue 2014
Back to Top