株式会社グローバルインフォメーション
TEL: 044-952-0102
市場調査レポート

米国の消化管内視鏡デバイス市場 (2019-2025年):13レポートセット

Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Device Market Report Suite | United States | 2019-2025 | MedSuite (Includes 13 reports)

発行 iData Research Inc. 商品コード 795304
出版日 ページ情報 英文 676 Pages
納期: 即日から翌営業日
価格
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=106.08円で換算しております。

※ Single Userライセンスは、DRM (デジタル著作権管理システム) 付PDFになります。
認証されたPC上のみでの閲覧となっております。

Back to Top
米国の消化管内視鏡デバイス市場 (2019-2025年):13レポートセット Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Device Market Report Suite | United States | 2019-2025 | MedSuite (Includes 13 reports)
出版日: 2019年02月02日 ページ情報: 英文 676 Pages
概要

当レポートセットでは、米国の消化管内視鏡デバイスの市場を調査し、対象疾患の概要、患者人口および処置件数、製品ポートフォリオ、臨床試験およびリコール対象製品、製品区分別の主要動向、市場成長への各種影響因子の分析、市場規模の推移と予測、競合環境と市場シェアなどをまとめています。

疾患概要

  • 解剖学的構造
  • 診断・治療
  • 患者人口統計

製品評価

  • 製品ポートフォリオ
    • GI内視鏡
    • カプセル内視鏡
    • 仮想大腸内視鏡
    • ステント留置・拡張用デバイス
    • ERCP (内視鏡的逆行性胆道膵管造影) 用デバイス
    • 生検鉗子・ポリープ切除用スネア・穿刺吸引
    • 異物回収・試験片除去用デバイス
    • 止血用デバイス
    • 経腸栄養デバイス
    • 逆流防止用デバイス
    • バレット食道アブレーション用デバイス
  • FDAリコール製品
  • 臨床試験中の製品

米国の消化管内視鏡デバイス市場:概要

  • 市場概要
  • 動向分析:区分別
  • 成長推進因子・抑制因子
  • 市場シェア分析
  • M&A
  • 企業プロファイル
  • SWOT分析

処置件数

  • 処置件数
    • 概要
    • 消化管内視鏡処置
    • カプセル内視鏡処置
    • 仮想内視鏡処置
    • ステント留置
    • 拡張処置
    • 組織生検
    • ポリープスネア切除
    • 検体回収
    • 異物除去
    • 止血
    • 経腸栄養チューブ留置
    • 逆流防止デバイス留置
    • バレット食道アブレーション

消化管内視鏡市場

  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析・予測
    • 総市場
    • 大腸内視鏡
    • S状結腸鏡
    • 十二指腸鏡
    • 小腸内視鏡
    • 超音波内視鏡
    • ダブルバルーン内視鏡
    • 胃内視鏡
    • サードパーティ整備内視鏡
  • 成長推進因子・抑制因子
  • 市場シェア分析

カプセル内視鏡市場

  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析・予測
    • カメラカプセル
    • ワークステーション
    • データレコーダー
  • 成長推進因子・抑制因子
  • 市場シェア分析

大腸内視鏡検査ソフトウェア市場

  • 市場分析・予測
  • 成長推進因子・抑制因子
  • 市場シェア分析

ステント留置・拡張用デバイス市場

  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析・予測
    • 総市場
    • 十二指腸ステント
    • 結腸ステント
    • 食道拡張バルーン
    • 十二指腸拡張バルーン
    • 結腸拡張バルーン
  • 成長推進因子・抑制因子
  • 市場シェア分析

ERCP (内視鏡的逆行性胆道膵管造影) 用デバイス市場

  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析・予測
    • 括約筋切開
    • 胆石除去用バルーン
    • 胆石除去用バスケット
    • 胆管拡張用バルーン
    • 胆管・膵臓ステント全体
    • 胆道結石破砕器
    • ERCPガイドワイヤー
    • ERCPカニューレ
  • 成長推進因子・抑制因子
  • 市場シェア分析

生検鉗子・ポリープ切除用スネア・穿刺吸引市場

  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析・予測
  • 成長推進因子・抑制因子
  • 市場シェア分析

検体回収・異物除去用デバイス市場

  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析・予測
  • 成長推進因子・抑制因子
  • 市場シェア分析

止血用デバイス市場

  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析・予測
    • 電気メス
    • 止血プローブ
    • ライゲーションデバイス
    • 硬化療法用ニードル
  • 成長推進因子・抑制因子
  • 市場シェア分析

経腸栄養用デバイス市場

  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析・予測
    • 経腸栄養ポンプ
    • 経腸栄養チューブ
    • 経腸栄養セット
  • 成長推進因子・抑制因子
  • 市場シェア分析

逆流防止デバイス市場

  • 市場環境
  • 市場分析・予測
  • 成長推進因子・抑制因子
  • 市場シェア分析

バレット食道アブレーション用デバイス市場

  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析・予測
  • 成長推進因子・抑制因子
  • 市場シェア分析
図表

LIST OF CHARTS

  • Chart 1 1: Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 2
  • Chart 16 2: Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Device Market Overview, U.S., 2018 & 2025 2
  • Chart 4 1: Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 169
  • Chart 4 2: Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Device Market Breakdown, U.S., 2018 170
  • Chart 4 3: Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Device Market Breakdown, U.S., 2025 171
  • Chart 4 4: Growth Rates by Segment, Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Device Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 175
  • Chart 4 5: Leading Competitors, Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Device Market, U.S., 2018 184
  • Chart 5 1: Total Gastrointestinal Procedures by Type, U.S., 2015 - 2025 243
  • Chart 5 2: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 248
  • Chart 5 3: Capsule Endoscopy Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 250
  • Chart 5 4: Virtual Endoscopy Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 252
  • Chart 5 5: Stenting Procedures by Anatomy, U.S., 2015 - 2025 254
  • Chart 5 6: Dilation Procedures by Anatomy, U.S., 2015 - 2025 256
  • Chart 5 7: Tissue Biopsy Procedures by Modality, U.S., 2015 - 2025 258
  • Chart 5 8: Polypectomy Snare Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 260
  • Chart 5 9: Specimen Retrieval Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 262
  • Chart 5 10: Foreign-Body Removal Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 264
  • Chart 5 11: Hemostasis Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 266
  • Chart 5 12: Enteral Feeding Tube Placement Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 268
  • Chart 5 13: Anti-Reflux Device Implantation Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 270
  • Chart 5 14: Barrett's Esophagus Ablation Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 272
  • Chart 6 1: Gastrointestinal Endoscope Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 278
  • Chart 6 2: Gastrointestinal Endoscope Market Breakdown, U.S., 2018 279
  • Chart 6 3: Gastrointestinal Endoscope Market Breakdown, U.S., 2025 280
  • Chart 6 4: Total Gastrointestinal Endoscope Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 282
  • Chart 6 5: Colonoscope Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 285
  • Chart 6 6: Sigmoidoscope Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 287
  • Chart 6 7: Duodenoscope Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 289
  • Chart 6 8: Enteroscope Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 291
  • Chart 6 9: Ultrasound Endoscope Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 293
  • Chart 6 10: Double-Balloon Endoscope Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 295
  • Chart 6 11: Gastroscope Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 297
  • Chart 6 12: Third-Party Refurbished Endoscope Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 299
  • Chart 6 13: Leading Competitors, Gastrointestinal Endoscope Market, U.S., 2018 306
  • Chart 6 14: Leading Competitors, Third-Party Endoscope Refurbishment and Repair Market, U.S., 2018 309
  • Chart 7 1: Capsule Endoscopy Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 313
  • Chart 7 2: Capsule Endoscopy Market Breakdown, U.S., 2018 314
  • Chart 7 3: Capsule Endoscopy Market Breakdown, U.S., 2025 315
  • Chart 7 4: Camera Capsule Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 318
  • Chart 7 5: Workstation Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 320
  • Chart 7 6: Data Recorder Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 322
  • Chart 7 7: Leading Competitors, Capsule Endoscopy Market, U.S., 2018 328
  • Chart 8 1: Virtual Colonoscopy Software Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 333
  • Chart 8 2: Leading Competitors, Virtual Colonoscopy Software Market, U.S., 2018 340
  • Chart 9 1: Stenting and Dilation Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 345
  • Chart 9 2: Stenting and Dilation Device Market Breakdown, U.S., 2018 346
  • Chart 9 3: Stenting and Dilation Device Market Breakdown, U.S., 2025 347
  • Chart 9 4: Esophageal Stent Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 350
  • Chart 9 5: Total Esophageal Stent Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 352
  • Chart 9 6: Esophageal Covered-Metal Stent Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 354
  • Chart 9 7: Esophageal Bare-Metal Stent Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 356
  • Chart 9 8: Esophageal Plastic Stent Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 358
  • Chart 9 9: Duodenal Stent Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 360
  • Chart 9 10: Colonic Stent Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 362
  • Chart 9 11: Esophageal Dilation Balloon Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 364
  • Chart 9 12: Total Esophageal Dilation Balloon Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 366
  • Chart 9 13: Multi-Stage Esophageal Dilation Balloon Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 368
  • Chart 9 14: Single-Stage Esophageal Dilation Balloon Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 370
  • Chart 9 15: Duodenal Dilation Balloon Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 372
  • Chart 9 16: Colonic Dilation Balloon Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 374
  • Chart 9 17: Leading Competitors, Stenting and Dilation Device Market, U.S., 2018 387
  • Chart 9 18: Leading Competitors, Esophageal Stent Market, U.S., 2018 389
  • Chart 10 1: ERCP Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 394
  • Chart 10 2: ERCP Device Market Breakdown, U.S., 2018 395
  • Chart 10 3: ERCP Device Market Breakdown, U.S., 2025 396
  • Chart 10 4: Sphincterotome Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 398
  • Chart 10 5: Biliary Stone Removal Balloon Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 400
  • Chart 10 6: Biliary Stone Removal Basket Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 402
  • Chart 10 7: Biliary Dilation Balloon Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 404
  • Chart 10 8: Biliary and Pancreatic Stent Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 406
  • Chart 10 9: Total Biliary and Pancreatic Stent Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 408
  • Chart 10 10: Biliary and Pancreatic Covered-Metal Stent Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 410
  • Chart 10 11: Total Biliary and Pancreatic Covered-Metal Stent Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 412
  • Chart 10 12: Biliary and Pancreatic Standard Covered-Metal Stent Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 414
  • Chart 10 13: Biliary and Pancreatic Lumen-Apposing Covered-Metal Stent Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 416
  • Chart 10 14: Biliary and Pancreatic Bare-Metal Stent Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 418
  • Chart 10 15: Biliary and Pancreatic Plastic Stent Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 420
  • Chart 10 16: Biliary Lithotripter Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 422
  • Chart 10 17: ERCP Guidewire Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 424
  • Chart 10 18: ERCP Cannula Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 426
  • Chart 10 19: Leading Competitors, ERCP Device Market, U.S., 2018 432
  • Chart 10 20: Leading Competitors, Biliary and Pancreatic Stent Market, U.S., 2018 434
  • Chart 11 1: Biopsy Forceps, Polypectomy Snare and EUS Needle Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 437
  • Chart 11 2: Biopsy Forceps, Polypectomy Snare and EUS Needle Market Breakdown, U.S., 2018 438
  • Chart 11 3: Biopsy Forceps, Polypectomy Snare and EUS Needle Market Breakdown, U.S., 2025 439
  • Chart 11 4: Biopsy Forceps Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 441
  • Chart 11 5: Total Biopsy Forceps Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 443
  • Chart 11 6: Cold Disposable Biopsy Forceps Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 445
  • Chart 11 7: Hot Disposable Biopsy Forceps Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 447
  • Chart 11 8: Cold Reusable Biopsy Forceps Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 449
  • Chart 11 9: Hot Reusable Biopsy Forceps Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 451
  • Chart 11 10: Polypectomy Snare Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 453
  • Chart 11 11: EUS Needle Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 455
  • Chart 11 12: Total EUS Needle Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 457
  • Chart 11 13: Fine Needle Aspiration Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 459
  • Chart 11 14: Fine Needle Biopsy Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 461
  • Chart 11 15: Leading Competitors, Biopsy Forceps, Polypectomy Snare and EUS Needle Market, U.S., 2018 470
  • Chart 11 16: Leading Competitors, Biopsy Forceps Market, U.S., 2018 472
  • Chart 11 17: Leading Competitors, EUS Needle Market, U.S., 2018 474
  • Chart 12 1: Specimen retrieval and foreign-body removal Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 477
  • Chart 12 2: Specimen retrieval and foreign-body removal Device Market Breakdown, U.S., 2018 478
  • Chart 12 3: Specimen retrieval and foreign-body removal Device Market Breakdown, U.S., 2025 479
  • Chart 12 4: Specimen Retrieval Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 481
  • Chart 12 5: Total Specimen Retrieval Device Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 483
  • Chart 12 6: Polyp Retrieval Trap Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 485
  • Chart 12 7: Specimen Retrieval Net Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 487
  • Chart 12 8: Foreign-Body Removal Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 489
  • Chart 12 9: Total Foreign-Body Removal Device Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 491
  • Chart 12 10: Foreign-Body Removal Net Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 493
  • Chart 12 11: Foreign-Body Removal Grasper Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 495
  • Chart 12 12: Foreign-Body Removal Snare Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 497
  • Chart 12 13: Leading Competitors, Specimen Retrieval and Foreign-Body Removal Device Market, U.S., 2018 502
  • Chart 12 14: Leading Competitors, Specimen Retrieval Device Market, U.S., 2018 504
  • Chart 12 15: Leading Competitors, Foreign-Body Removal Device Market, U.S., 2018 506
  • Chart 13 1: Hemostasis Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 511
  • Chart 13 2: Hemostasis Device Market Breakdown, U.S., 2018 512
  • Chart 13 3: Hemostasis Device Market Breakdown, U.S., 2025 513
  • Chart 13 4: Electrosurgical Generator Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 515
  • Chart 13 5: Total Electrosurgical Generator Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 517
  • Chart 13 6: Electrosurgical Unit Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 520
  • Chart 13 7: Argon Module Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 522
  • Chart 13 8: Hemostasis Probe Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 524
  • Chart 13 9: Total Hemostasis Probe Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 526
  • Chart 13 10: Electrosurgical Probe Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 528
  • Chart 13 11: Total Electrosurgical Probe Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 530
  • Chart 13 12: Conventional Electrosurgical Probe Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 532
  • Chart 13 13: Injection-Needle Probe Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 534
  • Chart 13 14: Heat Probe Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 536
  • Chart 13 15: Argon Probe Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 538
  • Chart 13 16: Ligation Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 540
  • Chart 13 17: Total Ligation Device Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 542
  • Chart 13 18: Ligation Band Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 544
  • Chart 13 19: Ligation Clip Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 546
  • Chart 13 20: Sclerotherapy Needle Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 548
  • Chart 13 21: Leading Competitors, Hemostasis Device Market, U.S., 2018 554
  • Chart 13 22: Leading Competitors, Electrosurgical Generator Market, U.S., 2018 556
  • Chart 13 23: Leading Competitors, Hemostasis Probe Market, U.S., 2018 558
  • Chart 13 24: Leading Competitors, Electrosurgical Probe Market, U.S., 2018 560
  • Chart 13 25: Leading Competitors, Ligation Device Market, U.S., 2018 562
  • Chart 14 1: Enteral Feeding Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 565
  • Chart 14 2: Enteral Feeding Device Market Breakdown, U.S., 2018 566
  • Chart 14 3: Enteral Feeding Device Market Breakdown, U.S., 2025 567
  • Chart 14 4: Enteral Feeding Pump Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 570
  • Chart 14 5: Feeding Tube Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 573
  • Chart 14 6: Total Feeding Tube Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 575
  • Chart 14 7: PEG Tube Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 577
  • Chart 14 8: Total PEG Tube Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 579
  • Chart 14 9: Initial Placement PEG Tube Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 581
  • Chart 14 10: Replacement PEG Tube Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 583
  • Chart 14 11: Total Replacement PEG Tube Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 585
  • Chart 14 12: Replacement Traditional Tube Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 587
  • Chart 14 13: Replacement Low-Profile Balloon Tube Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 589
  • Chart 14 14: Replacement Low-Profile Non-Balloon Tube Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 591
  • Chart 14 15: DPEJ Tube Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 593
  • Chart 14 16: PEG-J Tube Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 595
  • Chart 14 17: NG/NJ Tube Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 597
  • Chart 14 18: Feeding Set Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 599
  • Chart 14 19: Leading Competitors, Enteral Feeding Device Market, U.S., 2018 604
  • Chart 14 20: Leading Competitors, Feeding Tube Market, U.S., 2018 606
  • Chart 14 21: Leading Competitors, PEG Tube Market, U.S., 2018 608
  • Chart 15 1: Anti-Reflux Device Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 615
  • Chart 15 2: Leading Competitors, Anti-Reflux Device Market, U.S., 2018 620
  • Chart 16 1: Barrett's Esophagus Ablation Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 623
  • Chart 16 2: Barrett's Esophagus Ablation Device Market Breakdown, U.S., 2018 624
  • Chart 16 3: Barrett's Esophagus Ablation Device Market Breakdown, U.S., 2025 625
  • Chart 16 4: Ablation Device Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 627
  • Chart 16 5: Ablation Catheter Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 629
  • Chart 16 6: Leading Competitors, Barrett's Esophagus Ablation Device Market, U.S., 2018 634

LIST OF FIGURES

  • Figure 16 1: Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Device Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2018 (1 of 3) 3
  • Figure 16 2: Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Device Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2018 (2 of 3) 4
  • Figure 16 3: Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Device Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2018 (3 of 3) 4
  • Figure 16 4: Companies Researched in this Report 5
  • Figure 16 5: Factors Impacting the Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Device Market by Segment, U.S. (1 of 2) 6
  • Figure 16 6: Factors Impacting the Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Device Market by Segment, U.S. (2 of 2) 7
  • Figure 16 7: Recent Events in the Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Device Market, U.S., 2016 - 2018 8
  • Figure 16 8: Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Device Procedures Covered 9
  • Figure 16 9: Procedure Codes Investigated 10
  • Figure 16 10: Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Device Markets Covered (1 of 3) 11
  • Figure 16 11: Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Device Markets Covered (2 of 3) 12
  • Figure 16 12: Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Device Markets Covered (3 of 3) 13
  • Figure 16 13: Key Report Updates 14
  • Figure 16 14: Version History 15
  • Figure 2 1: General Statistic of Digestive Diseases: All Digestive Diseases, U.S., 2004 - 2010 43
  • Figure 3 1: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy by Company (1 of 3) 52
  • Figure 3 2: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy by Company (2 of 3) 53
  • Figure 3 3: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy by Company (3 of 3) 54
  • Figure 3 4: Capsule Endoscopy by Company 57
  • Figure 3 5: Virtual Colonoscopy by Company 59
  • Figure 3 6: Stenting and Dilation Devices by Company 62
  • Figure 3 7: ERCP Devices by Company (1 of 3) 64
  • Figure 3 8: ERCP Devices by Company (2 of 3) 65
  • Figure 3 9: ERCP Devices by Company (3 of 3) 66
  • Figure 3 10: Biopsy Forceps, Polypectomy Snares, Fine Aspiration Needles by Company 68
  • Figure 3 11: Foreign Body Retrieval and Specimen Removal Devices by Company 70
  • Figure 3 12: Hemostasis Devices by Company 73
  • Figure 3 13: Enteral Feeding Devices by Company (1 of 3) 75
  • Figure 3 14: Enteral Feeding Devices by Company (2 of 3) 76
  • Figure 3 15: Enteral Feeding Devices by Company (3 of 3) 77
  • Figure 3 16: Anti-Reflux Devices by Company 79
  • Figure 3 17: Barrett's Esophagus Ablation Devices by Company 81
  • Figure 3 18: Class 2 Device Recall Spyscope DS Access and Delivery Catheter 82
  • Figure 3 19:Class 2 Device Recall Extractor Pro RX 82
  • Figure 3 20: Class 2 Device Recall Expel Drainage Catheter with TwistLoc Hub Biliary Drainage Catheter and BiliaryDrainage Catheter Kit 82
  • Figure 3 21: Class 2 Device Recall Boston Scientific Extractor Pro XL Retrieval Balloon Catheter 83
  • Figure 3 22: Class 2 Device Recall Advance 35LP LowProfile PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter 84
  • Figure 3 23: Class 2 Device Recall CheckFlo Introducer 84
  • Figure 3 24: Class 2 Device Recall Flexor CheckFlo Introducer 84
  • Figure 3 25: Class 2 Device Recall Ring Transjugular Intrahepatic Access Set & Flexor RTPS Guiding Sheath 85
  • Figure 3 26: Class 2 Device Recall Transluminal Biliary Biopsy Forceps Set 85
  • Figure 3 27: Class 2 Device Recall CheckFlo Hemostasis Assembly 85
  • Figure 3 28: Class 2 Device Recall FUJINON ED530XT 86
  • Figure 3 29: Class 2 Device Recall Fujifilm 86
  • Figure 3 30: Class 2 Device Recall Fujifilm 86
  • Figure 3 31: Class 2 Device Recall Fujifilm Endoscope 87
  • Figure 3 32: Class 2 Device Recall Dudenoscope 87
  • Figure 3 33: Class 2 Device Recall Fujifilm 87
  • Figure 3 34: Class 2 Device Recall Fujifilm 88
  • Figure 3 35: Class 2 Device Recall CORTRAK 2 Nasogastric/Nasointestinal (NG/NI) Feeding Tubes w/ ANTIIV Connector 88
  • Figure 3 36: Class 2 Device Recall OERPro Endoscope Reprocessor 89
  • Figure 3 37: Class 2 Device Recall EVIS EXERA Duodenovideoscope OLYMPUS TJF 160F/VF 89
  • Figure 3 38: Class 2 Device Recall Evis Exera II Duodenovideoscope Olympus TJFQ180V 89
  • Figure 3 39: Class 2 Device Recall MAJ1606 Instrument Channel Adaptor 89
  • Figure 3 40: Class 2 Device Recall EVIS EXERA II Gastrovideoscope OLYMPUS GF type UCT180 90
  • Figure 3 41: Class 2 Device Recall EVIS EXERA II Duodenovideoscope OLYMPUS TJF TypeQ180V 90
  • Figure 3 42: Class 2 Device Recall Pentax Video Duodenoscope 91
  • Figure 3 43: Class 2 Device Recall Ultrasound Video Gastroscope 91
  • Figure 3 44: Class 2 Device Recall 91
  • Figure 3 45: Class 2 Device Recall Pentax Video Duodenoscope 92
  • Figure 3 46: Class 2 Device Recall Pentax 92
  • Figure 3 47: Class 2 Device Recall Pentax Video Gastroscope 92
  • Figure 3 48: Class 2 Device Recall Pentax 92
  • Figure 3 49: Class 2 Device Recall Pentax 93
  • Figure 3 50: Class 2 Device Recall Pentax Medical 93
  • Figure 3 51: Class 2 Device Recall Pentax Medical Inc. 93
  • Figure 3 52: Class 2 Device Recall Pentax Medical Inc. 93
  • Figure 3 53: Class 3 Device Recall Roth Net Polyp Retrieval 94
  • Figure 3 54: Class 2 Device Recall Talon Grasping Device 94
  • Figure 3 55: Comparison of FCSEMS and Plastic Stents (WON-MVP) 95
  • Figure 3 56: AXIOS Lumen Apposing Metal Stent for Walled Off Necrosis Drainage IDE Study 95
  • Figure 3 57: WallFlex Esophageal Fully Covered (FC) Benign Anastomotic Stricture 96
  • Figure 3 58: TECR & ECM Placement for Esophageal High Grade Dysplasia 96
  • Figure 3 59: A Trial of Esophageal and Gastric Stenting for Leak or Perforation (ESO-stent) 96
  • Figure 3 60: Colonic Stenting With Elective Surgery Versus Emergency Surgery in the Management of Acute Malignant Colonic Obstruction 97
  • Figure 3 61: Esophageal Fully Covered Metal Stents in Caustic Strictures Study 97
  • Figure 3 62: Fully Covered or Partially Covered Stents in Malignant Esophageal Strictures (COPAC) 97
  • Figure 3 63: Treatment of Malignant Strictures in Esophagus and Gastroesophageal Junction With Covered or Partially Covered Stent. (StentMig) 98
  • Figure 3 64: Cholangioscopic Classification of Bile Duct Lesions 98
  • Figure 3 65: Single-operator Digital Cholangioscopy for the Diagnosis of Malignant and Benign Biliary Strictures 98
  • Figure 3 66: SpyGlass AMEA Registry 99
  • Figure 3 67: Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Based Sampling of Indeterminate Bile Duct Strictures 99
  • Figure 3 68: POCS in Liver Transplantation Patients 99
  • Figure 3 69: SpyGlass Direct Visualization System Clinical Registry in China (SpyChina) 100
  • Figure 3 70: Effect of Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation on Recurrent Rate of Patients With Recurrentstones in Bile Duct 100
  • Figure 3 71: Effect of Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation on ERCP Complications 100
  • Figure 3 72: Self-expandable Metallic Stent Versus Multiple Plastic Stents in Post Orthotopic Liver Transplantation Biliary Stenosis 101
  • Figure 3 73: Prospective Evaluation of Residual Bile Duct Stone by Peroral Cholangioscopy After Conventional ERCP 101
  • Figure 3 74: Prospective Evaluation of the Ability of Spyglass Cholangioscopy to Facilitate Radiation Free ERCP 101
  • Figure 3 75: Endoscopic Biliary RFA of Malignant Bile Duct Obstruction 102
  • Figure 3 76: Efficacy and Safety of Photodynamic Therapy for Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma 102
  • Figure 3 77: Endoscopic Treatment of Difficult Bile Duct Stones: Spyglass + EHL x Balloon Dilation of the Papilla (EHL) 102
  • Figure 3 78: WallFlex Biliary Fully Covered (FC) Chronic Pancreatitis Study 103
  • Figure 3 79: Short Term Pancreatic Stenting Registry 103
  • Figure 3 80: Preoperative Biliary Drainage With Metal Versus Plastic Stents in Periampullary Cancer 103
  • Figure 3 81: Covered vs Uncovered Metal Stents for Palliative Biliary Decompression in Inoperable Malignant Distal Bile Duct Obstruction 104
  • Figure 3 82: Digital SpyGlass Confirmed Common Bile Duct Stones Clearance Without Fluoroscopy 104
  • Figure 3 83: Balloon Catheter vs. Basket Catheter for Endoscopic Bile Duct Stone Extraction 104
  • Figure 3 84: Non-Complex Biliary Stones DSC vs ERC 105
  • Figure 3 85: Pancreatic Metal Stents in Chronic Pancreatitis 105
  • Figure 3 86: WallFlex Pancreatic Metal Stent for Pancreatic Duct Strictures 105
  • Figure 3 87: WallFlex Biliary Fully Covered (FC) Benign Stricture Study 106
  • Figure 3 88: Prospective, Multi-Center All-Comer Biliary Canadian WallFlex Registry 106
  • Figure 3 89: Preoperative Biliary Drainage in Resectable Pancreatic or Periampullary Cancer 106
  • Figure 3 90: Pancreatic Duct Stenting to Prevent Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula (POPF) After Distal Pancreatectomy 107
  • Figure 3 91: Pre-operative Biliary SEMS RCT During Neoadjuvant Therapy 107
  • Figure 3 92: Efficacy and Safety Study of PDT Using Deuteporfin for Unresectable Advanced Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma 107
  • Figure 3 93: Laser Lithotripsy for Difficult Large Bile Duct Stones 108
  • Figure 3 94: Endodrill vs. Conventional Biopsy. Evaluation of Diagnostic Capacity in Diffuse Gastric Cancer 108
  • Figure 3 95: EUS GUIDED Transduodenal Biopsy Using the 19G Flex (NIFLEX) 108
  • Figure 3 96: EUS-CNB Versus EUS-SINK for Diagnosis of Upper Gastrointestinal (UGI) Subepithelial Tumors 109
  • Figure 3 97: Biopsy Forceps Versus Cold Snare for the Resection of Small Colonic Polyps 109
  • Figure 3 98: EUS FNB Versus FNA With On-Site Cytopathology in Solid Pancreatic Masses 109
  • Figure 3 99: Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) Guided Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) EUS-FNA of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions Using a Novel Corkscrew Technique: a Pilot Study 110
  • Figure 3 100: Safety of Endoscopic Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps: A Randomized Trial. 110
  • Figure 3 101: Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS) Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Using Free Stylet 22g and 25 g Needles 110
  • Figure 3 102: Comparison of Two Needle Aspiration Techniques for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) in Solid Pancreatic Lesions 111
  • Figure 3 103: Evaluation of PCLs Using Three EUS-FNA Needles 111
  • Figure 3 104: EUS-FNA of Solid Pancreatic Mass: Comparison Between Negative Pressure and Slow-pull Technique (EUS-FNA) 111
  • Figure 3 105: Vela China Study: in Cutting And Hemostasis For Gastrointestinal Epithelial Neoplasia In Chinese Population 112
  • Figure 3 106: Removal of the Evolution® Esophageal Stent - Fully Covered (CLARITY) 113
  • Figure 3 107: SX ELLA Esophageal Degradable BD Stent System (DESTINY) 113
  • Figure 3 108: Using Covered Stent of Diameter of 7mm in TIPS 114
  • Figure 3 109: Comparison of Covered and Bare Stent in TIPS 114
  • Figure 3 110: Evolution® Biliary Stent System Clinical Study 115
  • Figure 3 111: Pancreatic Stent for Distal Pancreatectomy 115
  • Figure 3 112: Endoscopic Nasogallbladder Drainage Versus Gallbladder Stenting Before Cholecystecomy 116
  • Figure 3 113: Prospective Random Comparing Study on EUS-guided Pseudocyst Drainage by Naso-pancreatic Tube and Stents 116
  • Figure 3 114: Comparison Between Fully Covered Metal Stents and Plastic Stents in Preoperative Biliary Drainage 116
  • Figure 3 115: Evolution® Biliary Stent System-Fully Covered 117
  • Figure 3 116: Pancreatic Duct Stent for Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis 117
  • Figure 3 117: Endoscopic Biliary Drainage in Malignant High Grade Biliary Stricture 117
  • Figure 3 118: Comparison of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Plus Large-balloon Dilatation and Conventional Treatment for Large CBD Stones 118
  • Figure 3 119: Comparison of Loop-tip Cook Medical® Wire Versus Traditional Endoscopic Technique (loop) 118
  • Figure 3 120: Comparison Of Loop-Tip Wire Vs Traditional Technique In The Cannulation Of The Common Bile Duct 118
  • Figure 3 121: Prospective Trial of EUS-FNA Versus EUS-FNB Using a Novel Core Biopsy Needle (MUCIN) 119
  • Figure 3 122: Yield Rate for Procurement the Histologic Core With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Biopsy With 20-gauge Ultrasound Biopsy Needles for Solid Pancreatic Masses: Pilot Study 119
  • Figure 3 123: Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Biopsy With 25-gauge Biopsy Needles for Solid Pancreatic Masses 119
  • Figure 3 124: Head to Head Comparison of Two Needles EUS Guided FNB 120
  • Figure 3 125: Comparison of Jumbo and Hot Biopsy Forceps 120
  • Figure 3 126: Diagnostic Yield of 20-gauge Procore Needle for EUS-guided FNA Biopsy in Solid Pancreatic Lesions 120
  • Figure 3 127: EUS-FNA With 22G Procore Needles vs 22G Conventional Needles 121
  • Figure 3 128: A Multicenter Trial, Comparing a 25G EUS Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) Device With a 20G EUS ProCore Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) Device (ASPRO) 121
  • Figure 3 129: Comparison of EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Technique 121
  • Figure 3 130: Comparison of Back-loaded vs Preloaded Fiducial Needles in EUS-guided Fiducial Marker Placement in Pancreatic Cancer. 122
  • Figure 3 131: Evaluation of Multiple Needle Use in EUS-FNA for Pancreatic Cancer (EMUNE-07) 122
  • Figure 3 132: EUS-guided Glue Injection for Varices Study 123
  • Figure 3 133: Study of Hemospray for Lower Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage 123
  • Figure 3 134: RCT to Determine the Efficacy of Combining Hemospray With Medical Treatment in Acute Variceal Bleeding 123
  • Figure 3 135: Hemospray Versus the Combined Conventional Technique for Endoscopic Hemostasis of Bleeding Peptic Ulcers : A Pilot Study 124
  • Figure 3 136: The EndoGastric Solutions TEMPO Trial (TEMPO) 125
  • Figure 3 137: Retrospective TIF Study for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). The RetroTIF Study (RetroTIF) 125
  • Figure 3 138: Randomized EsophyX Versus Sham / Placebo Controlled TIF Trial: The RESPECT Study (RESPECT) 126
  • Figure 3 139: Hernia Reduction Prior to Scheduled TIF Completion (HEURISTIC) 126
  • Figure 3 140: Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF) Registry Study for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) 126
  • Figure 3 141: Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF) Versus Sham for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) 127
  • Figure 3 142: Registry to Compare Two Surgical Treatments for GERD (STAR Registry) 127
  • Figure 3 143: Cryobiopsy or Forceps Biopsy During Semirigid Thoracoscopy: a Comparative Study 128
  • Figure 3 144: Hybrid APC Assisted EMR for Large Colon Polyps 128
  • Figure 3 145: PROSpective Assessment of Post EmR Recurrence (PROSPER) 129
  • Figure 3 146: A Phase II Multicentre Trial of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas (RADIOCYST01) 129
  • Figure 3 147: Minimal Risk Registry of Endoscopic Image and Pathology Correlation for Fujiflim 130
  • Figure 3 148: Resect and Discard Extension to FICE of NIcE Classification (FICE;NICE) 130
  • Figure 3 149: ColoAssist vs. MEI 130
  • Figure 3 150: Linked Color Imaging Based CMV Diagnosis for Gastric Mucosal Lesions 131
  • Figure 3 151: Linked-color Imaging for the Detection of Colorectal Flat Lesions 131
  • Figure 3 152: Linked Color Imaging/Magnifying Blue Laser Imaging vs. White Light for Adenomas and Serrated Lesions in Proximal Colon 131
  • Figure 3 153: Blue Laser Imaging and White Light Imaging Colonic Polyps 132
  • Figure 3 154: Linked Color Imaging Versus High-definition White Light Endoscopy for the Detection of Polyps in Patients With Lynch Syndrome (LCI-LYNCH) 132
  • Figure 3 155: Double-balloon Colonoscopy to Increase Colonoscopy Completion Rate 132
  • Figure 3 156: Clinical Study Comparing PillCam® Crohn's Capsule Endoscopy to Ileocolonoscopy (IC) Plus MRE for Detection of Active CD in the Small Bowel and Colon in Subjects With Known CD and Mucosal Disease (BLINK) 133
  • Figure 3 157: A Treat-to-target Strategy Using Pan-enteric Capsule Endoscopy (PCE) in Paediatric Crohn's Disease (CD). (PCE) 133
  • Figure 3 158: Monitoring Disease Activity Using Video Capsule Endoscopy (VCE) in Crohn's Disease (CD) Subjects 134
  • Figure 3 159: Evaluation the Efficacy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) Versus Computed Tomographic Colonography (CTC) in the Identification of Colonic Polyps in a Screening Population. (TOPAZ) 134
  • Figure 3 160: Evaluation of PillCam IBD Capsule Endoscopy System in Visualization of Lesions in the Colon Indicative of Ulcerative Colitis Disease (UC) 134
  • Figure 3 161: Optimization of the Bowel Preparation Regimen for the PillCam® COLON 2 Capsule Endoscopy Procedure 135
  • Figure 3 162: Development of Applications of PillCam™ Endoscopy and Patency Systems and Clinical Evaluation of Their Performance in Healthy Volunteers ("HEIGHT" Study) 135
  • Figure 3 163: Development of Applications of the ® PillCam Endoscopy System and Evaluation of Their Performance (NOISE) 135
  • Figure 3 164: Evaluation of Performance Characteristics of Capsule Endoscopy With PillCam UGI Capsule Compared to Standard Endoscopy 136
  • Figure 3 165: Capsule Colonoscopy in Crohn's Disease and Its Correlation With Conventional Colonoscopy and Faecal Calprotectin 136
  • Figure 3 166: Capsule Endoscopy for Hemorrhage in the Emergency Room (CHEER) 136
  • Figure 3 167: Capsule Endoscopy for HEmorrhage in the ER (CHEER) 137
  • Figure 3 168: PillCam SBC System Functionality in Established and Suspected IBD Patients (PIANO) 137
  • Figure 3 169: Retrospective Collection of PillCam SB Movies (OCEAN) 137
  • Figure 3 170: Clinical Management With SPM System and Validation of the SPM 5 Hour Cutoff in Patients With Symptoms of Gastroparesis 138
  • Figure 3 171: Efficacy of Colonoscopy, Colon Capsule and Fecal Immunological Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening (FAMCAP) 138
  • Figure 3 172: RFA for Flat Type High-grade and Medium-grade Intraepithelial Squamous Neoplasia (REACH) 139
  • Figure 3 173: A Safety and Tolerability of Circumferential Anal Canal Radiofrequency Ablation For Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia 139
  • Figure 3 174: A Trial of Radiofrequency Ablation for Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia Using the HALO Ablation System (AIN) 139
  • Figure 3 175: Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Large Symptomatic Heterotopic Gastric Mucosa (RAGE) 140
  • Figure 3 176: The EMPrint™ Ablate and RESect Study in Patients With Metastatic Lung Tumors (EMPRESS) (EMPRESS) 140
  • Figure 3 177: Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus (RABE) 140
  • Figure 3 178: HALO Patient Registry: Ablation of Barrett's Esophagus 141
  • Figure 3 179: Ablation of Intestinal Metaplasia Containing Dysplasia 141
  • Figure 3 180: Endoscopic Prevention of Esophageal Cancer at Tenwek Hospital (EXPECT) 141
  • Figure 3 181: Cytosponge Adequacy Study Evaluation II (CASEII) 142
  • Figure 3 182: Non-Endoscopic Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus Following Ablative Therapy 142
目次
Product Code: iDATA_USGI19_MS

The GI endoscopic device market includes GI endoscopes, capsule endoscopy, virtual colonoscopy software, stenting and dilation devices, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) devices, biopsy forceps, polypectomy snares, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) needles, foreign-body and specimen removal devices, hemostasis devices, enteral feeding devices, anti-reflux devices and Barrett's esophagus ablation devices.

In 2018, the largest segment in the GI endoscopic device market was the GI endoscope market. The majority of total GI endoscope unit sales consisted of colonoscopes used in the hospital setting, either at a designated endoscopy room or general surgery suite, with the balance being used in the outpatient centers. Although there is a general downward trend in prices across the GI endoscope segments, it will be moderated by an upward trend in segments such as colonoscopes, where users are converting towards new premium-priced products.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS I

LIST OF FIGURES XIV

LIST OF CHARTS XXXII

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

U.S. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPIC DEVICE MARKET OVERVIEW 1

COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS 3

MARKET TRENDS 6

MARKET DEVELOPMENTS 8

PROCEDURE NUMBERS 9

PROCEDURE CODES INVESTIGATED 10

MARKETS INCLUDED 11

KEY REPORT UPDATES 14

VERSION HISTORY 15

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 16

    • Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection 16
    • Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research 19
    • Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design 21
    • Step 4: Performing Primary Research 22
    • Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates 24
    • Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis 25
    • Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities 27
    • Step 8: Final Review and Market Release 28
    • Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring 29

DISEASE OVERVIEW 30

  • 2.1 BASIC ANATOMY 30
  • 2.2 DISEASE TREATMENT & DIAGNOSTICS 32
    • 2.2.1 Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease 32
    • 2.2.2 Barrett's Esophagus 34
    • 2.2.3 GI Cancer 34
    • 2.2.4 GI bleeding 37
    • 2.2.5 Bile Duct Diseases 38
    • 2.2.6 Crohn's Disease 39
    • 2.2.7 Peptic Ulcer Disease 40
    • 2.2.8 Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction and Ogilvie Syndrome 40
  • 2.3 PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS 42
    • 2.3.1 GI Disorders 42
      • 2.3.1.1 General Statistics of GI Disorders for Different Years for the United States 43
      • 2.3.1.2 Abdominal Wall Hernia 44
      • 2.3.1.3 Chronic Constipation 45
      • 2.3.1.4 Diverticular Disease 45
      • 2.3.1.5 Prescriptions 45
      • 2.3.1.6 Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease 45
      • 2.3.1.7 Gastrointestinal Infections 46
      • 2.3.1.8 Hemorrhoids 46
      • 2.3.1.9 Inflammatory Bowel Disease 46
      • 2.3.1.10 Liver Disease 47
      • 2.3.1.11 Pancreatitis 47
      • 2.3.1.12 Peptic Ulcer Diseases 47
    • 2.3.2 GI Cancers 48

PRODUCT ASSESSMENT 49

  • 3.1 INTRODUCTION 49
  • 3.2 PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS 49
    • 3.2.1 GI Endoscopy 49
    • 3.2.2 Capsule Endoscopy 55
    • 3.2.3 Virtual Colonoscopy 58
    • 3.2.4 Stenting and Dilation Devices 60
    • 3.2.5 Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Devices 63
    • 3.2.6 Biopsy Forceps, Polypectomy Snares, Fine-Needle Aspiration 67
    • 3.2.7 Foreign Body Retrieval and Specimen Removal Devices 69
    • 3.2.8 Hemostasis Devices 71
    • 3.2.9 Enteral Feeding Devices 74
    • 3.2.10 Anti-Reflux Devices 78
    • 3.2.11 Barrett's Esophagus Ablation Devices 80
  • 3.3 FDA RECALLS 82
    • 3.3.1 Boston Scientific 82
      • 3.3.1.1 ERCP 82
    • 3.3.2 Cook Medical 84
      • 3.3.2.1 Stenting and Dilation Devices 84
      • 3.3.2.2 Biopsy Forceps, Polypectomy Snares and Fine-Needle Aspiration 85
      • 3.3.2.3 Hemostasis Devices 85
    • 3.3.3 Fujifilm 86
    • 3.3.4 Avanos Medical 88
      • 3.3.4.1 Enteral Feeding 88
    • 3.3.5 Olympus 89
      • 3.3.5.1 Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 89
    • 3.3.6 Pentax Medical 91
      • 3.3.6.1 Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 91
    • 3.3.7 US Endoscopy 94
      • 3.3.7.1 Foreign Body Retrieval and Specimen Removal 94
  • 3.4 CLINICAL TRIALS 95
    • 3.4.1 Boston Scientific 95
      • 3.4.1.1 Stenting & Dilation 95
      • 3.4.1.2 ERCP 98
      • 3.4.1.3 Biopsy Forceps, Polypectomy Snares, Fine-Needle Aspiration 108
      • 3.4.1.4 Hemostasis Devices 112
    • 3.4.2 Cook Medical 113
      • 3.4.2.1 Stenting and Dilation Devices 113
      • 3.4.2.2 ERCP 115
      • 3.4.2.3 Biopsy Forceps, Polypectomy Snares, Fine-Needle Aspiration 119
      • 3.4.2.4 Hemostasis Devices 123
    • 3.4.3 EndoGastric 125
      • 3.4.3.1 Anti-Reflux Devices for Treatment of GERD 125
    • 3.4.4 ERBE 128
      • 3.4.4.1 Hemostasis Devices 128
    • 3.4.5 Fujifilm 130
    • 3.4.6 Medtronic 133
      • 3.4.6.1 Capsule Endoscopy 133
      • 3.4.6.2 Barrett's Esophagus Ablation Devices 139
    • 3.4.7 Olympus 143
      • 3.4.7.1 Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 143
      • 3.4.7.2 Capsule Endoscopy 155
      • 3.4.7.3 Biopsy Forceps, Polypectomy Snares, Fine-Needle Aspiration 156
      • 3.4.7.4 Hemostasis Devices 158
    • 3.4.8 Pentax Medical 160
      • 3.4.8.1 Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 160

U.S. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPIC DEVICE MARKET OVERVIEW 164

  • 4.1 INTRODUCTION 164
  • 4.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 165
  • 4.3 TREND ANALYSIS BY SEGMENT 172
  • 4.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 176
    • 4.4.1 Market Drivers 176
    • 4.4.2 Market Limiters 177
  • 4.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 179
  • 4.6 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS 185
  • 4.7 COMPANY PROFILES 186
    • 4.7.1 Boston Scientific 186
    • 4.7.2 Cardinal Health 188
    • 4.7.3 CONMED 190
    • 4.7.4 Cook Medical 191
    • 4.7.5 EndoGastric Solutions 192
    • 4.7.6 ERBE 193
    • 4.7.7 Fujifilm 194
    • 4.7.8 GE Healthcare 196
    • 4.7.9 Avanos Medical 197
    • 4.7.10 Medline 198
    • 4.7.11 Medtronic 200
    • 4.7.12 Olympus 202
    • 4.7.13 Pentax Medical 204
    • 4.7.14 Siemens Healthineers 205
    • 4.7.15 STERIS 206
    • 4.7.16 US Endoscopy 207
    • 4.7.17 Vital Images, Inc. 208
  • 4.8 SWOT ANALYSIS 209
    • 4.8.1 Boston Scientific 210
    • 4.8.2 Cardinal Health 212
    • 4.8.3 CONMED 214
    • 4.8.4 Cook Medical 216
    • 4.8.5 EndoGastric Solutions 218
    • 4.8.6 ERBE 219
    • 4.8.7 Fujifilm 220
    • 4.8.8 GE Healthcare 223
    • 4.8.9 Avanos Medical 225
    • 4.8.10 Medline 227
    • 4.8.11 Medtronic 229
    • 4.8.12 Olympus 231
    • 4.8.13 Pentax Medical 233
    • 4.8.14 Siemens Healthineers 234
    • 4.8.15 STERIS 236
    • 4.8.16 US Endoscopy 237
    • 4.8.17 Vital Images, Inc. 238

PROCEDURE NUMBERS 239

  • 5.1 INTRODUCTION 239
  • 5.2 PROCEDURES 240
    • 5.2.1 Procedure Overview 240
    • 5.2.2 Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Procedures 244
      • 5.2.2.1 EGD Procedures 244
      • 5.2.2.2 Colonoscopy Procedures 244
      • 5.2.2.3 Sigmoidoscopy Procedures 244
      • 5.2.2.4 Enteroscopy Procedures 244
      • 5.2.2.5 Ultrasound Endoscopy Procedures 245
      • 5.2.2.6 ERCP Procedures 245
    • 5.2.3 Capsule Endoscopy Procedures 249
    • 5.2.4 Virtual Endoscopy Procedures 251
    • 5.2.5 Stenting Procedures 253
    • 5.2.6 Dilation Procedures 255
    • 5.2.7 Tissue Biopsy Procedures 257
    • 5.2.8 Polypectomy Snare Procedures 259
    • 5.2.9 Specimen Retrieval Procedures 261
    • 5.2.10 Foreign-Body Removal Procedures 263
    • 5.2.11 Hemostasis Procedures 265
    • 5.2.12 Enteral Feeding Tube Placement Procedures 267
    • 5.2.13 Anti-Reflux Device Implantation Procedures 269
    • 5.2.14 Barrett's Esophagus Ablation Procedures 271

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPE MARKET 273

  • 6.1 INTRODUCTION 273
  • 6.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 275
  • 6.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 281
    • 6.3.1 Total Gastrointestinal Endoscope Market 281
    • 6.3.2 Colonoscope Market 283
    • 6.3.3 Sigmoidoscope Market 286
    • 6.3.4 Duodenoscope Market 288
    • 6.3.5 Enteroscope Market 290
    • 6.3.6 Ultrasound Endoscope Market 292
    • 6.3.7 Double-Balloon Endoscope Market 294
    • 6.3.8 Gastroscope Market 296
    • 6.3.9 Third-Party Refurbished Endoscope Market 298
  • 6.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 300
    • 6.4.1 Market Drivers 300
    • 6.4.2 Market Limiters 301
  • 6.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 303
    • 6.5.1 Gastrointestinal Endoscope 303
    • 6.5.2 Third-Party Endoscope Resale and Repair Market 307

CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY MARKET 310

  • 7.1 INTRODUCTION 310
  • 7.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 312
  • 7.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 316
    • 7.3.1 Camera Capsule Market 316
    • 7.3.2 Workstation Market 319
    • 7.3.3 Data Recorder Market 321
  • 7.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 323
    • 7.4.1 Market Drivers 323
    • 7.4.2 Market Limiters 324
  • 7.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 326

VIRTUAL COLONOSCOPY SOFTWARE MARKET 329

  • 8.1 INTRODUCTION 329
  • 8.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 331
  • 8.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 334
    • 8.3.1 Market Drivers 334
    • 8.3.2 Market Limiters 335
  • 8.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 337

STENTING AND DILATION DEVICE MARKET 341

  • 9.1 INTRODUCTION 341
  • 9.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 343
  • 9.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 348
    • 9.3.1 Total Esophageal Stent Market 348
      • 9.3.1.1 Esophageal Covered-Metal Stent Market 353
      • 9.3.1.2 Esophageal Bare-Metal Stent Market 355
      • 9.3.1.3 Esophageal Plastic Stent Market 357
    • 9.3.2 Duodenal Stent Market 359
    • 9.3.3 Colonic Stent Market 361
    • 9.3.4 Total Esophageal Dilation Balloon Market 363
      • 9.3.4.1 Multi-Stage Esophageal Dilation Balloon Market 367
      • 9.3.4.2 Single-Stage Esophageal Dilation Balloon Market 369
    • 9.3.5 Duodenal Dilation Balloon Market 371
    • 9.3.6 Colonic Dilation Balloon Market 373
  • 9.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 375
    • 9.4.1 Esophageal Stent Market 375
      • 9.4.1.1 Market Drivers 375
      • 9.4.1.2 Market Limiters 376
    • 9.4.2 Duodenal Stent Market 377
      • 9.4.2.1 Market Drivers 377
      • 9.4.2.2 Market Limiters 377
    • 9.4.3 Colonic Stent Market 378
      • 9.4.3.1 Market Drivers 378
      • 9.4.3.2 Market Limiters 378
    • 9.4.4 Esophageal Dilation Balloon Market 379
      • 9.4.4.1 Market Drivers 379
      • 9.4.4.2 Market Limiters 379
    • 9.4.5 Duodenal Dilation Balloon Market 381
      • 9.4.5.1 Market Drivers 381
      • 9.4.5.2 Market Limiters 381
    • 9.4.6 Colonic Dilation Balloon Market 383
      • 9.4.6.1 Market Drivers 383
  • 9.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 384
    • 9.5.1 Stenting and Dilation Device Market 384
    • 9.5.2 Esophageal Stent Market 388

ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY DEVICE MARKET 390

  • 10.1 INTRODUCTION 390
  • 10.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 391
  • 10.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 397
    • 10.3.1 Sphincterotome Market 397
    • 10.3.2 Biliary Stone Removal Balloon Market 399
    • 10.3.3 Biliary Stone Removal Basket Market 401
    • 10.3.4 Biliary Dilation Balloon Market 403
    • 10.3.5 Total Biliary and Pancreatic Stent Market 405
      • 10.3.5.1 Total Biliary and Pancreatic Covered-Metal Stent Market 409
      • 10.3.5.1.1 Biliary and Pancreatic Standard Covered-Metal Stent Market 413
      • 10.3.5.1.2 Biliary and Pancreatic Lumen-Apposing Covered-Metal Stent Market 415
      • 10.3.5.2 Biliary and Pancreatic Bare-Metal Stent Market 417
      • 10.3.5.3 Biliary and Pancreatic Plastic Stent Market 419
    • 10.3.6 Biliary Lithotripter Market 421
    • 10.3.7 ERCP Guidewire Market 423
    • 10.3.8 ERCP Cannula Market 425
  • 10.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 427
    • 10.4.1 Market Drivers 427
    • 10.4.2 Market Limiters 427
  • 10.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 429
    • 10.5.1 ERCP Device Market 429
    • 10.5.2 Biliary and Pancreatic Stent Market 433

BIOPSY FORCEPS, POLYPECTOMY SNARE AND EUS NEEDLE MARKET 435

  • 11.1 INTRODUCTION 435
  • 11.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 436
  • 11.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 440
    • 11.3.1 Total Biopsy Forceps Market 440
      • 11.3.1.1 Cold Disposable Biopsy Forceps Market 444
      • 11.3.1.2 Hot Disposable Biopsy Forceps Market 446
      • 11.3.1.3 Cold Reusable Biopsy Forceps Market 448
      • 11.3.1.4 Hot Reusable Biopsy Forceps Market 450
    • 11.3.2 Polypectomy Snare Market 452
    • 11.3.3 Total EUS Needle Market 454
      • 11.3.3.1 Fine Needle Aspiration Market 458
      • 11.3.3.2 Fine Needle Biopsy Market 460
  • 11.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 462
    • 11.4.1 Biopsy Forceps Market 462
      • 11.4.1.1 Market Drivers 462
      • 11.4.1.2 Market Limiters 462
    • 11.4.2 Polypectomy Snare Market 464
      • 11.4.2.1 Market Drivers 464
      • 11.4.2.2 Market Limiters 464
    • 11.4.3 EUS Needle Market 466
      • 11.4.3.1 Market Drivers 466
      • 11.4.3.2 Market Limiters 466
  • 11.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 467
    • 11.5.1 Biopsy Forceps Market 471
    • 11.5.2 EUS Needle Market 473

SPECIMEN RETRIEVAL AND FOREIGN-BODY REMOVAL DEVICE MARKET 475

  • 12.1 INTRODUCTION 475
  • 12.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 476
  • 12.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 480
    • 12.3.1 Total Specimen Retrieval Device Market 480
      • 12.3.1.1 Polyp Retrieval Trap Market 484
      • 12.3.1.2 Specimen Retrieval Net Market 486
    • 12.3.2 Total Foreign-Body Removal Device Market 488
      • 12.3.2.1 Foreign-Body Removal Net Market 492
      • 12.3.2.2 Foreign-Body Removal Grasper Market 494
      • 12.3.2.3 Foreign-Body Removal Snare Market 496
  • 12.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 498
    • 12.4.1 Market Drivers 498
    • 12.4.2 Market Limiters 499
  • 12.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 500
    • 12.5.1 Specimen Retrieval and Foreign-Body Removal Device Market 500
    • 12.5.2 Specimen Retrieval Device Market 503
    • 12.5.3 Foreign-Body Removal Device Market 505

HEMOSTASIS DEVICE MARKET 507

  • 13.1 INTRODUCTION 507
  • 13.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 509
  • 13.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 514
    • 13.3.1 Total Electrosurgical Generator Market 514
      • 13.3.1.1 Electrosurgical Unit Market 518
      • 13.3.1.2 Argon Module Market 521
    • 13.3.2 Total Hemostasis Probe Market 523
      • 13.3.2.1 Total Electrosurgical Probe Market 527
      • 13.3.2.1.1 Conventional Electrosurgical Probe Market 531
      • 13.3.2.1.2 Injection-Needle Probe Market 533
      • 13.3.2.2 Heat Probe Market 535
      • 13.3.2.3 Argon Probe Market 537
    • 13.3.3 Total Ligation Device Market 539
      • 13.3.3.1 Ligation Band Market 543
      • 13.3.3.2 Ligation Clip Market 545
    • 13.3.4 Sclerotherapy Needle Market 547
  • 13.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 549
    • 13.4.1 Market Drivers 549
    • 13.4.2 Market Limiters 549
  • 13.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 551
    • 13.5.1 Hemostasis Device Market 551
    • 13.5.2 Electrosurgical Generator Market 555
    • 13.5.3 Hemostasis Probe Market 557
    • 13.5.4 Electrosurgical Probe Market 559
    • 13.5.5 Ligation Device Market 561

ENTERAL FEEDING DEVICE MARKET 563

  • 14.1 INTRODUCTION 563
  • 14.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 564
  • 14.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 568
    • 14.3.1 Enteral Feeding Pump Market 568
    • 14.3.2 Total Feeding Tube Market 571
      • 14.3.2.1 Total PEG Tube Market 576
      • 14.3.2.1.1 Initial Placement PEG Tube Market 580
      • 14.3.2.1.2 Total Replacement PEG Tube Market 582
      • 14.3.2.2 DPEJ Tube Market 592
      • 14.3.2.3 PEG-J Tube Market 594
      • 14.3.2.4 NG/NJ Tube Market 596
    • 14.3.3 Feeding Set Market 598
  • 14.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 600
    • 14.4.1 Market Drivers 600
    • 14.4.2 Market Limiters 601
  • 14.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 602
    • 14.5.1 Enteral Feeding Device Market 602
    • 14.5.2 Feeding Tube Market 605
      • 14.5.2.1 PEG Tube Market 607

ANTI-REFLUX DEVICE MARKET 609

  • 15.1 INTRODUCTION 609
  • 15.2 MARKET LANDSCAPE 611
  • 15.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 613
  • 15.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 616
    • 15.4.1 Market Drivers 616
    • 15.4.2 Market Limiters 617
  • 15.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 618

BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS ABLATION DEVICE MARKET 621

  • 16.1 INTRODUCTION 621
  • 16.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 622
  • 16.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 626
    • 16.3.1 Ablation Device Market 626
    • 16.3.2 Ablation Catheter Market 628
  • 16.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 630
    • 16.4.1 Market Drivers 630
    • 16.4.2 Market Limiters 630
  • 16.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 632

ABBREVIATIONS 635

Back to Top