メールサービス キャンペーン : 期間中に新規登録や配信希望カテゴリの変更等をされた方に、ご用意した無料レポートを提供しております。 新規登録 / 登録内容変更

株式会社グローバルインフォメーション
TEL: 044-952-0102
表紙
市場調査レポート

低侵襲脊椎インプラントの欧州市場

Europe Market Overview for Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants 2017 - MedView

発行 iData Research Inc. 商品コード 531704
出版日 ページ情報 英文 421 Pages
納期: 即日から翌営業日
価格
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=111.20円で換算しております。

※ Single Userライセンスは、DRM (デジタル著作権管理システム) 付PDFになります。
認証されたPC上のみでの閲覧となっております。

Back to Top
低侵襲脊椎インプラントの欧州市場 Europe Market Overview for Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants 2017 - MedView
出版日: 2017年07月01日 ページ情報: 英文 421 Pages
概要

当レポートでは欧州の低侵襲脊椎インプラント市場を調査し、全体的な市場の見通し(販売量・収益額・平均価格・市場成長率)や市場動向、主な市場促進・阻害要因、競合情勢、市場シェアや疾患・処置の概要、主要企業のプロファイルなど、体系的な情報を提供しています。

目次

図表一覧

エグゼクティブサマリー

欧州の低侵襲脊椎インプラント市場

競合分析

市場動向

市場の発展

調査対象市場

分析の更新情報

改訂履歴

第1章 調査手法

  • 調査範囲
  • iDataの9段階の分析方法

第2章 疾患概要

  • イントロダクション
    • 変性椎間板疾患
    • 椎間板ヘルニア
    • 脊椎すべり症
    • 関節炎
  • 脊柱変形
    • 脊柱側弯症
    • 脊柱後弯症・脊柱前弯症
  • 外傷・腫瘍
  • 脊椎圧迫骨折
    • 骨粗鬆症
    • 脊椎圧迫骨折

第3章 欧州の低侵襲脊椎インプラント市場の概要

  • イントロダクション
    • 低侵襲固定術
      • 後方進入椎体間固定術(PLIF)
      • 片側進入腰椎後方椎体間固定術(TLIF)
      • 側方進入椎体間固定術(LLIF)
      • 前方進入椎体間固定術(OLIF)
    • 低侵襲椎弓根スクリュー(PS)術
      • 経皮的挿入による椎弓根スクリュー術
      • 開創器による椎弓根スクリュー術
    • 棘突起固定術
    • 椎間関節固定術
    • 低侵襲仙腸関節固定術
    • 低侵襲脊椎内視鏡下手術
  • 為替レート
  • 市場概要
  • 動向分析:セグメント別
  • 市場促進・阻害要因
    • 促進要因
    • 阻害要因
  • 市場シェアの分析
  • 企業プロファイル
    • Alphatec Spine
    • DePuy Synthes
    • Globus Medical
    • K2M
    • Medtronic
    • Orthofix
    • Stryker
    • Zimmer Biomet
  • SWOT分析
    • DePuy Synthes
    • DJO Global
    • Globus Medical
    • Joimax Gmbh
    • K2M Inc.
    • Karl Storz
    • Medtronic
    • Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
    • NuVasive
    • Orthofix
    • Paradigm Spine
    • Richard Wolf
    • SI-Bone
    • Spinal Kinetic
    • Stryker
    • Zimmer Biomet

国別プロファイル

  • イントロダクション
    • 人口
    • 平均年齢
    • 人口1人当たりのGDP
    • 物価指数
  • ドイツ
  • フランス
  • 英国
  • イタリア
  • スペイン
  • ベネルクス諸国
  • スカンジナビア諸国
  • オーストリア
  • スイス
  • ポルトガル

略語一覧

企業のプレスリリース

目次
Product Code: iDATA_EUMIS17_MV

The full report suite on the European market for minimally invasive spinal implants includes segments for MIS interbody devices, MIS pedicle screws, spinous process fixation, facet fixation, MIS sacroiliac joint fusion, spine endoscope and MIS spine instrumentation. Despite multiple challenges, growth is expected in many market segments, as patient demographics in Europe maintain a steady demand for such procedures. Growth has increased across all segments as regulations become better adapted to MIS procedures.

General Report Contents:

  • Market Analyses include: Unit Sales, ASPs, Market Value & Growth Trends
  • Market Drivers & Limiters for each chapter segment
  • Competitive Analysis for each chapter segment
  • Section on recent mergers & acquisitions

The biggest limiting factor for the MIS spinal device market is the complexity of the procedures and the skill required to master them. In particular, percutaneous techniques and, to a lesser extent, retractor techniques are considered by many to be considerably more difficult to master than traditional open surgical methods. Older generations of doctors and surgeons are especially reluctant to switch to MIS, as it takes a considerable time investment to master the procedure.

One of the key drivers for the MIS spinal device market is the increase in the target population. Both fusion and non-fusion procedures are typically performed in order to treat spinal complications that are much more common in elderly patients. Across Europe, the percentage of those over 50 years of age comprises approximately 34% of the total population. Over the next 20 years, this percentage is expected to increase by nearly 10%. The growth of this population is expected to stimulate growth in both fusion and non-fusion spinal implant markets.

The MIS interbody market continues to see a shift toward OLIF and LLIF devices and away from MIPLIF and MITLIF devices. The oblique and lateral lumbar approaches are expected to see more growth than their posterior and transforaminal lumbar counterparts, although positive growth is expected across segments.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURES

LIST OF CHARTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EUROPE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET OVERVIEW

COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

MARKET TRENDS

MARKET DEVELOPMENTS

PROCEDURES COVERED

MARKETS INCLUDED

KEY REPORT UPDATES

VERSION HISTORY

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

  • 1.1. RESEARCH SCOPE
  • 1.2. IDATA'S 9-STEP METHODOLOGY
    • Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
    • Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
    • Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
    • Step 4: Performing Primary Research
    • Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
    • Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
    • Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
    • Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
    • Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring

DISEASE OVERVIEW

  • 2.1. INTRODUCTION
    • 2.1.1. Degenerative Disc Disease
      • 2.1.1.1. Disc Herniation
      • 2.1.1.2. Stenosis
      • 2.1.1.3. Spondyloisthesis
      • 2.1.1.4. Arthritis
    • 2.1.2. Spinal Deformities
      • 2.1.2.1. Scoliosis
      • 2.1.2.2. Kyphosis and Lordosis
    • 2.1.3. Trauma and Tumor
    • 2.1.4. Vertebral Compression Fractures
      • 2.1.4.1. Osteoporosis
      • 2.1.4.2. Vertebral Compression Fractures

EUROPE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET OVERVIEW

  • 3.1. INTRODUCTION
    • 3.1.1. Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion
      • 3.1.1.1. Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
      • 3.1.1.2. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
      • 3.1.1.3. Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
      • 3.1.1.4. Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    • 3.1.2. Minimally Invasive Surgery Pedicle Screws
      • 3.1.2.1. Percutaneous MIS Systems
      • 3.1.2.2. Retractor-Based MIS Systems
    • 3.1.3. Spinous Process Fixation
    • 3.1.4. Facet Fixation
    • 3.1.5. MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
    • 3.1.6. MIS Spine Endoscopes
  • 3.2. CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE
  • 3.3. MARKET OVERVIEW
  • 3.4. TREND ANALYSIS BY SEGMENT
  • 3.5. DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
    • 3.5.1. Market Drivers
    • 3.5.2. Market Limiters
  • 3.6. COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
  • 3.7. COMPANY PROFILES
    • 3.7.1. Alphatec Spine
    • 3.7.2. DePuy Synthes
    • 3.7.3. Globus Medical
    • 3.7.4. K2M
    • 3.7.5. Medtronic
    • 3.7.6. Orthofix
    • 3.7.7. Stryker
    • 3.7.8. Zimmer Biomet
  • 3.8. SWOT ANALYSIS
    • 3.8.1. DePuy Synthes
    • 3.8.2. DJO Global
    • 3.8.3. Globus Medical
    • 3.8.4. Joimax Gmbh
    • 3.8.5. K2M Inc.
    • 3.8.6. Karl Storz
    • 3.8.7. Medtronic
    • 3.8.8. Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
    • 3.8.9. NuVasive
    • 3.8.10. Orthofix
    • 3.8.11. Paradigm Spine
    • 3.8.12. Richard Wolf
    • 3.8.13. SI-Bone
    • 3.8.14. Spinal Kinetic
    • 3.8.15. Stryker
    • 3.8.16. Zimmer Biomet

COUNTRY PROFILES

  • 4.1. INTRODUCTION
      • 4.1.1.1. Population
      • 4.1.1.2. Median Age
      • 4.1.1.3. GDP Per Capita
      • 4.1.1.4. Price Index
  • 4.2. GERMANY
  • 4.3. FRANCE
  • 4.4. UNITED KINGDOM
  • 4.5. ITALY
  • 4.6. SPAIN
  • 4.7. BENELUX
  • 4.8. SCANDINAVIA
  • 4.9. AUSTRIA
  • 4.10. SWITZERLAND
  • 4.11. PORTUGAL

ABBREVIATIONS

APPENDIX: COMPANY PRESS RELEASES

LIST OF CHARTS

  • Chart 1 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market by Segment, Europe, 2013 - 2023
  • Chart 1 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Overview, Europe, 2016 & 2023
  • Chart 3 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Europe, 2013 - 2023
  • Chart 3 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Breakdown, Europe, 2016
  • Chart 3 3: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Breakdown, Europe, 2023
  • Chart 3 4: Growth Rates by Segment, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, Europe, 2013 - 2023
  • Chart 3 5: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, Europe, 2016
  • Chart 4 1: Country Profile, Germany, 2016
  • Chart 4 2: Country Profile, France, 2016
  • Chart 4 3: Country Profile, United Kingdom, 2016
  • Chart 4 4: Country Profile, Italy, 2016
  • Chart 4 5: Country Profile, Spain, 2016
  • Chart 4 6: Country Profile, Benelux, 2016
  • Chart 4 7: Country Profile, Scandinavia, 2016
  • Chart 4 8: Country Profile, Austria, 2016
  • Chart 4 9: Country Profile, Switzerland, 2016
  • Chart 4 10: Country Profile, Portugal, 2016

LIST OF FIGURES

  • Figure 1 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Share Ranking by Segment, Europe, 2016 (1 of 2)
  • Figure 1 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Share Ranking by Segment, Europe, 2016 (2 of 2)
  • Figure 1 3: Companies Researched in this Report, Europe, 2016
  • Figure 1 4: Factors Impacting the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market by Segment, Europe (1 of 2)
  • Figure 1 5: Factors Impacting the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market by Segment, Europe (2 of 2)
  • Figure 1 6: Recent Events in the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market, Europe, 2015 - 2017
  • Figure 1 7: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Procedures Covered, Europe, 2016
  • Figure 1 8: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Markets Covered, Europe, 2016
  • Figure 1 9: Key Report Updates
  • Figure 1 10: Version History
  • Figure 3 1: Currency Exchange Rate, 2016
  • Figure 3 2: Total Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, Europe, 2013 - 2023 (€M)
  • Figure 3 3: Total Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, Europe, 2013 - 2023 (US$M)
  • Figure 3 4: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Europe, 2013 - 2023 (€M)
  • Figure 3 5: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Europe, 2013 - 2023 (US$M)
  • Figure 3 6: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Growth by Segment, Europe, 2013 - 2023
  • Figure 3 7: Drivers and Limiters, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, Europe, 2016
  • Figure 3 8: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, Europe, 2016
  • Figure 3 9: SWOT Analysis, DePuy Synthes, 2017
  • Figure 3 10: SWOT Analysis, DJO Global, 2017
  • Figure 3 11: SWOT Analysis, Globus Medical, 2017
  • Figure 3 12: SWOT Analysis, Joimax, 2017 (1 of 2)
  • Figure 3 13: SWOT Analysis, Joimax, 2017 (2 of 2)
  • Figure 3 14: SWOT Analysis, K2M, 2017 (1 of 2)
  • Figure 3 15: SWOT Analysis, K2M, 2017 (2 of 2)
  • Figure 3 16: SWOT Analysis, Karl Storz, 2017
  • Figure 3 17: SWOT Analysis, Medtronic, 2017
  • Figure 3 18: SWOT Analysis, Merit Medical Systems, 2017
  • Figure 3 19: SWOT Analysis, NuVasive, 2017
  • Figure 3 20: SWOT Analysis, Orthofix, 2017
  • Figure 3 21: SWOT Analysis, Paradigm Spine, 2017
  • Figure 3 22: SWOT Analysis, Richard Wolf, 2017
  • Figure 3 23: SWOT Analysis, SI-Bone, 2017
  • Figure 3 24: SWOT Analysis, Spinal Kinetic, 2017
  • Figure 3 25: SWOT Analysis, Stryker, 2017
  • Figure 3 26: SWOT Analysis, Zimmer Biomet, 2017 (1 of 2)
Back to Top