SALE
市場調査レポート

韓国の整形外科大関節置換用装置市場

South Korea Market for Orthopedic Large Joint Replacement Devices - 2016

発行 iData Research Inc. 商品コード 347781
出版日 ページ情報 英文 139 Pages
納期: 即日から翌営業日
価格
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=106.12円で換算しております。
10% OFF 2016年07月31日まで 期間限定キャンペーン

ご注意: Single Userライセンスは、DRM (デジタル著作権管理システム) 付PDFになります。
認証されたPC上のみでの閲覧となっております。

Back to Top
韓国の整形外科大関節置換用装置市場 South Korea Market for Orthopedic Large Joint Replacement Devices - 2016
出版日: 2015年11月01日 ページ情報: 英文 139 Pages
概要

当レポートでは、韓国の整形外科大関節置換用装置市場について調査分析し、市場全体/セグメント (膝関節、股関節、骨セメント) 別に、市場分析と予測、促進要因・阻害要因 、競合分析について、体系的な情報を提供しています。

第1章 調査手法

第2章 韓国の整形外科大関節置換用装置市場の概要

  • イントロダクション
  • 市場概要
  • 動向分析
  • 促進要因・阻害要因
  • 競合分析

第3章 処置件数

  • イントロダクション
  • 処置件数
    • 全置換
    • 膝関節置換
    • 股関節置換

第4章 膝関節置換用装置市場

  • イントロダクション
  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析と予測
  • 促進要因・阻害要因
  • 競合分析

第5章 股関節置換用装置市場

  • イントロダクション
  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析と予測
  • 促進要因・阻害要因
  • 競合分析

第6章 骨セメント市場

  • イントロダクション
  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析と予測
  • 促進要因・阻害要因
  • 競合分析
目次
Product Code: iDATA_SKLJ16_RPT

Reconstructive implants are grouped into four broad categories: primary (total) replacement, partial replacement, resurfacing and revision. Total joint replacement (TJR) involves replacing both sides of the natural joint. These devices are the most frequently used reconstructive procedures in the United States.

Partial joint replacements restore one side or a portion of the joint. These procedures have the advantage of preserving more bone and soft tissue but have historically been prone to a higher complication rate than total joint replacements. Partial replacement, also known as hemiarthroplasty, provides an alternative to joint fixation, or arthrodesis, in some instances of skeletal trauma.

Joint resurfacing attempts to preserve as much of the original bone stock as possible by placing a cap over the diseased joint surfaces. The cap is anchored by a short stem within the bone. These procedures are performed more frequently in younger patients, as the preservation of bone stock allows for better outcomes when the implant is eventually replaced later in life.

Revision implants are not a specific product type but refer to the replacement of implanted devices that have either reached the end of their useable lifespan or have become loosened through trauma or pathology. This may entail either the replacement of part of the implant or the entire implant. In general, revision implants require longer stems to anchor in the bone. Conservative estimates indicate that 15 years is an appropriate lifespan to expect from an implant regardless of its construction or method of fixation; however, newer devices are likely to exceed that time frame.

If anything, the trend towards younger patients has meant that the market has been even more mindful of preparing for the eventuality of revision because of the increased average lifespan for these surgical candidates.

Implants are subject to their own wear issues. Regardless of the type of construction, there are some basic safety concerns. Like the cartilage that it replaces, the articulating material is subject to wear. The concern remains with debris generation. While the material itself is inert, the body's immune response to stray fragments creates the potential for osteolysis, the destruction of bone. There are similar concerns with devices using hard-on-hard articulating surfaces, as early ceramic materials were prone to chipping.

There is an increasing trend towards marketing patient-specific implants, especially those targeted at women. This follows the overall trend of greater product diversification and provides a synergy with consumer-directed marketing. One of the key drivers is the Internet, with acknowledgement that patients who have educated themselves are not only more likely to choose implantation surgery over other options but also to choose a specific brand of implant.

The original technique of arthroplasty involved cementing the implanted device with bone cement, which provided immediate fixation. This is beneficial from the standpoint of recovery, as a strongly fixated joint allows for more successful rehabilitation and an earlier return to active living. The significant disadvantage is that the process of cementing kills bone cells. As bone naturally replenishes itself, the reduced stock of bone building osteoblast cells means that the device-bone interface weakens over time, resulting in a loosening of the joint.

Simultaneous bilateral implantation is a procedure that involves replacing both left and right joints in the same surgical operation. The benefit of doing so is reduced overall surgical time and a shortened combined rehabilitation period for patients. The main drawback is increased blood loss during the operation.

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is sometimes regarded as much of a marketing term as it is a method of surgery. While all parties define MIS as surgery that requires a lesser degree of tissue disruption, there is no concrete way of quantifying what objective measures describe MIS surgeries.

Computer-guided systems represent a small portion of the joint replacement market at present. Alignment is more precise and incisions are smaller, but issues remain with obtaining accurate patient landmark data during surgery. These systems need to be properly oriented in order to obtain accurate navigation, but this depends greatly on patient positioning. Most systems require patients to be precisely repositioned during surgery, which increases time spent in the operating room as well as the chance of infection.

Because of an understandable aversion to surgery, implantation technology will likely face competition from therapies that require less invasive procedures. Most of these technologies are focused on regenerating the diseased cartilage layer rather than eliminating it, as is performed with joint replacement.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURES

LIST OF CHARTS

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

  • 1.1 RESEARCH SCOPE
  • 1.2 IDATA'S 9-STEP METHODOLOGY
    • Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
    • Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
    • Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
    • Step 4: Performing Primary Research
    • Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
    • Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
    • Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
    • Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
    • Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring

SOUTH KOREAN ORTHOPEDIC LARGE JOINT REPLACEMENT DEVICE MARKET OVERVIEW

  • 2.1 INTRODUCTION
    • 2.1.1 Anatomy and Pathology
    • 2.1.2 Treatment
    • 2.1.3 Treatment Complications
    • 2.1.4 General Product Classifications
      • 2.1.4.1 Total Joint Replacement
      • 2.1.4.2 Partial Joint Replacement
      • 2.1.4.3 Joint Resurfacing
      • 2.1.4.4 Revision
      • 2.1.4.5 Implant Wear and Durability
    • 2.1.5 Patient-Specific Products and Consumer Awareness
    • 2.1.6 Cementless versus Cemented Implantation
    • 2.1.7 Simultaneous Bilateral Implantation
    • 2.1.8 Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • 2.1.9 Computer-Assisted Navigation Systems
    • 2.1.10 Emerging Technologies
  • 2.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
  • 2.3 TREND ANALYSIS
  • 2.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
    • 2.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 2.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 2.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

PROCEDURE NUMBERS

  • 3.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 3.2 PROCEDURE NUMBERS
    • 3.2.1 Total Large Joint Replacement Procedures
    • 3.2.2 Knee Replacement Procedures
      • 3.2.2.1 Total Knee Replacement Procedures
        • 3.2.2.1.1 Total Knee Replacement Procedures by Cementation Type
        • 3.2.2.1.2 Total Knee Replacement Procedures by Construction Type
        • 3.2.2.1.3 Total Knee Replacement Procedures by Bearing Type
      • 3.2.2.2 Partial Knee Replacement Procedures by Product Type
      • 3.2.2.3 Knee Replacement Revision Procedures
    • 3.2.3 Hip Replacement Procedures
      • 3.2.3.1 Total Hip Replacement Procedures
        • 3.2.3.1.1 Total Hip Replacement Procedures by Cementation Type
        • 3.2.3.1.2 Total Hip Replacement Procedures by Bearing Type
      • 3.2.3.2 Partial Hip Replacement Procedures by Product Type
      • 3.2.3.3 Resurfacing Hip Replacement Procedures

KNEE REPLACEMENT DEVICE MARKET

  • 4.1 INTRODUCTION
    • 4.1.1 Anatomy
    • 4.1.2 Pathology
    • 4.1.3 Treatment
    • 4.1.4 Implant Types
    • 4.1.4.1 Total Knee Replacement
    • 4.1.4.2 Partial Knee Replacement
    • 4.1.4.3 Knee Revision
    • 4.1.5 Fixation Method
    • 4.1.6 Bearing Surface
    • 4.1.7 Fixed versus Mobile Bearings
    • 4.1.8 Cruciate-Retaining versus Posterior Stabilized
  • 4.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
  • 4.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
    • 4.3.1 Total Knee Replacement Device Market by Cementation Type
      • 4.3.1.1 Cemented Total Knee Replacement Market
      • 4.3.1.2 Cementless Total Knee Replacement Market
      • 4.3.1.3 Hybrid Cemented Total Knee Replacement Market
    • 4.3.2 Total Knee Replacement Device Market by Construction Type
      • 4.3.2.1 Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Replacement Market
      • 4.3.2.2 Cruciate-Sacrificing Total Knee Replacement Market
    • 4.3.3 Total Knee Replacement Device Market by Bearing Type
      • 4.3.3.1 Fixed Bearing Total Knee Replacement Market
      • 4.3.3.2 Mobile Bearing Total Knee Replacement Market
    • 4.3.4 Partial Knee Replacement Device Market
      • 4.3.4.1 Unicondylar Partial Knee Replacement Market
      • 4.3.4.2 Patellofemoral Partial Knee Replacement Market
    • 4.3.5 Knee Replacement Revision Market
  • 4.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
    • 4.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 4.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 4.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

HIP REPLACEMENT DEVICE MARKET

  • 5.1 INTRODUCTION
    • 5.1.1 Anatomy
    • 5.1.2 Pathology
    • 5.1.3 Treatment
    • 5.1.4 Implant Types
      • 5.1.4.1 Primary Hip Joint Replacement
      • 5.1.4.2 Partial Hip Joint Replacement
      • 5.1.4.3 Resurfacing Hip Joint Replacement
      • 5.1.4.4 Revision Hip Joint Replacement
    • 5.1.5 Fixation Method
    • 5.1.6 Implant Material
    • 5.1.7 Bearing Surface Technology
      • 5.1.7.1 Polyethylene Bearings
      • 5.1.7.2 Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Bearings
      • 5.1.7.3 Metal Bearings
      • 5.1.7.4 Ceramic Bearings
  • 5.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
  • 5.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
    • 5.3.1 Total Hip Replacement Device Market by Cementation Type
      • 5.3.1.1 Cemented Total Hip Replacement Market
      • 5.3.1.2 Cementless Total Hip Replacement Market
      • 5.3.1.3 Hybrid Cemented Total Hip Replacement Market
    • 5.3.2 Total Hip Replacement Device Market by Bearing Type
      • 5.3.2.1 Metal on Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Total Hip Replacement Market
      • 5.3.2.2 Metal on Metal Total Hip Replacement Market
      • 5.3.2.3 Ceramic on Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Total Hip Replacement Market
      • 5.3.2.4 Ceramic on Ceramic Total Hip Replacement Market
    • 5.3.3 Partial Hip Replacement Device Market
    • 5.3.4 Resurfacing Hip Replacement Market
    • 5.3.5 Hip Replacement Revision Market
  • 5.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
    • 5.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 5.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 5.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

BONE CEMENT MARKET

  • 6.1 INTRODUCTION
    • 6.1.1 Antibiotic Usage
    • 6.1.2 Increased Popularity of Cementless Implants
  • 6.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
  • 6.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
    • 6.3.1 Total Bone Cement Market
    • 6.3.2 Traditional Bone Cement Market
    • 6.3.3 Premixed Antibiotic Bone Cement Market
  • 6.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
    • 6.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 6.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 6.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

ABBREVIATIONS

Back to Top