市場調査レポート

米国の創傷・組織管理市場

US Market for Wound and Tissue Management 2014 (2010-2020)

発行 iData Research Inc. 商品コード 315014
出版日 ページ情報 英文 353 Pages
納期: 即日から翌営業日
価格
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=101.50円で換算しております。

ご注意: Single Userライセンスは、DRM (デジタル著作権管理システム) 付PDFになります。
認証されたPC上のみでの閲覧となっております。

Back to Top
米国の創傷・組織管理市場 US Market for Wound and Tissue Management 2014 (2010-2020)
出版日: 2014年10月01日 ページ情報: 英文 353 Pages
概要

高齢化や肥満、糖尿病の発症率上昇によって需要が高まっており、FDAが認可した新製品の導入によって米国の創傷・組織管理市場が促進されています。最新の創傷被覆セグメントは2013年の最も成長した分野となりました。

当レポートは、米国の創傷・組織管理市場について調査し、市場の概要とともに、セグメント別の動向、市場発展予測、競合動向などをまとめています。

第1章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第2章 調査方法

第3章 米国の創傷・組織管理市場

  • イントロダクション
  • 市場概要
  • 動向分析
  • 促進因子と阻害因子
  • 競合分析
  • 合併・買収

第4章 創傷閉鎖市場

  • イントロダクション
  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析および予測
  • 促進因子と阻害因子
  • 競合分析

第5章 静的圧縮治療市場

  • イントロダクション
  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析および予測
  • 促進因子と阻害因子
  • 競合分析

第6章 動的圧縮治療市場

  • イントロダクション
  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析および予測
  • 促進因子と阻害因子
  • 競合分析

第7章 最新被覆市場概要

  • イントロダクション
  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析および予測
  • 促進因子と阻害因子
  • 競合分析

第8章 湿潤被覆市場

  • イントロダクション
  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析および予測
  • 促進因子と阻害因子
  • 競合分析

第9章 抗菌被覆市場

  • イントロダクション
  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析および予測
  • 促進因子と阻害因子
  • 競合分析

第10章 インタラクティブ被覆市場

  • イントロダクション
  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析および予測
  • 促進因子と阻害因子
  • 競合分析

第11章 非接着性コンタクトレーザー市場

  • イントロダクション
  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析および予測
  • 促進因子と阻害因子
  • 競合分析

第12章 従来型創傷被覆市場

  • イントロダクション
  • 市場分析および予測
  • 促進因子と阻害因子
  • 競合分析

第13章 止血市場

  • イントロダクション
  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析および予測
  • 促進因子と阻害因子
  • 競合分析

第14章 組織シーラント市場

  • イントロダクション
  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析および予測
  • 促進因子と阻害因子
  • 競合分析

第15章 抗接着市場

  • イントロダクション
  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析および予測
  • 促進因子と阻害因子
  • 競合分析

第16章 陰圧創傷治療市場

  • イントロダクション
  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析および予測
  • 促進因子と阻害因子
  • 競合分析

略語解説

目次
Product Code: iDATA_USWT14_RPT

The U.S market for wound and tissue management was driven by the introduction of newly FDA-approved products, and by demand due to the aging population, and increasing rates of both obesity and diabetes. The advanced wound dressings segment exhibited the highest growth in 2013. This growth will be due to the rising popularity of foam dressings, antimicrobial dressings and the influx of competitors and innovative products in the interactive dressing market. The reimbursement changes in 2014 will potentially have a negative impact on the growth of the interactive dressing market.

The range of products in the wound management industry is as diverse as the conditions they are meant to treat. The use of traditional dressings has stood the test of time and these will remain important products. This market will exhibit slow but healthy growth over the forecast period due to its sheer size. However, advanced dressings are the way of the future and there is still a large untapped potential market. Advanced dressings decrease the frequency a dressing must be changed and due to the commoditization of these products, the price gap between the two, traditional and advanced, is decreasing. Over the forecast period, companies which are able to modify and enhance their advanced dressing portfolio will be able to grow with the shift in product usage.

Growth in the negative pressure wound therapy market was significantly affected by the competitive bidding process. This market is expected to rebound and post growth in the high single-digits over the forecast period. Growth will be supplemented by improved reimbursement rates for single use negative pressure wound therapy pumps and an increase in the number of competitors.

With the baby boomers aging, the total number of people over the age of 65 is drastically increasing within the United States. With an aging population comes the requirement for more surgical procedures, all risking the possibility of circulatory issues. As a result, a greater number of devices used in surgery, such as wound closure devices, hemostats and tissue sealants, will be purchased. Therefore, sales of products that enhance circulation to treat lymphedema and chronic wounds are expected to increase to meet the growing demand of this population.

The wound and tissue management market is consistently changing through new reimbursement rates, FDA approval and product innovation. A company which was once a dominant player in a market can lose market share quickly due to a number of different factors. KCI continues to lead the negative pressure wound therapy market but their revenue was significantly affected by the competitive bidding process, which allowed Smith & Nephew to increase their market share. Shire, a once dominant player in the interactive dressing market, saw their revenue significantly decrease year-over-year due to their highlight product not receiving FDA approval for additional usage.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURES

LIST OF CHARTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  • 1.1 U.S. WOUND AND TISSUE MANAGEMENT MARKET
  • 1.2 GROWTH TRENDS BY SEGMENT
  • 1.3 WOUND CLOSURE MARKET
  • 1.4 STATIC COMPRESSION MARKET
  • 1.5 DYNAMIC COMPRESSION MARKET
  • 1.6 MOIST DRESSING MARKET
  • 1.7 ANTIMICROBIAL DRESSING MARKET
  • 1.8 INTERACTIVE DRESSING MARKET
  • 1.9 NON-ADHERENT CONTACT LAYER MARKET
  • 1.10 TRADITIONAL WOUND DRESSING MARKET
  • 1.11 HEMOSTAT MARKET
  • 1.12 TISSUE SEALANT MARKET
  • 1.13 ANTI-ADHESION MARKET
  • 1.14 NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY MARKET
  • 1.15 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

  • 2.1 RESEARCH SCOPE
  • 2.2 IDATA'S 9-STEP METHODOLOGY
    • Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
    • Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
    • Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
    • Step 4: Performing Primary Research
    • Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
    • Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
    • Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
    • Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
    • Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring

U.S. WOUND AND TISSUE MANAGEMENT MARKET OVERVIEW

  • 3.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 3.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
  • 3.3 TREND ANALYSIS
  • 3.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
    • 3.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 3.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 3.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
    • 3.5.1 Herfindahl Index
  • 3.6 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

WOUND CLOSURE MARKET

  • 4.1 INTRODUCTION
    • 4.1.1 Sutures
    • 4.1.2 Staplers
    • 4.1.3 Ligating Clip Appliers
    • 4.1.4 Skin Closure Strips
    • 4.1.5 Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesives
  • 4.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
  • 4.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
    • 4.3.1 Total Wound Closure Market
    • 4.3.2 Suture Market
    • 4.3.3 Total Stapler Market
      • 4.3.3.1 Skin Stapler Market
      • 4.3.3.2 Total Surgical Stapler Market
        • 4.3.3.2.1 Firing Gun Market
        • 4.3.3.2.2 Staple Reload Market
    • 4.3.4 Total Ligating Clip Applier Market
      • 4.3.4.1 Total Open Surgery Market
        • 4.3.4.1.1 Multi-Fire Clip Applier Market
        • 4.3.4.1.2 Single-Fire Clip Applier Market
      • 4.3.4.2 Total Laparoscopic Market
        • 4.3.4.2.1 Laparoscopic Multi-Fire Clip Applier Market
        • 4.3.4.2.2 Laparoscopic Single-Fire Clip Applier Market
          • 4.3.4.2.2.1 Laparoscopic Single-Fire Applier Market
          • 4.3.4.2.2.2 Laparoscopic Single-Fire Clip Market
    • 4.3.5 Skin Closure Strip Market
    • 4.3.6 Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive Market
  • 4.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
    • 4.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 4.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 4.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

STATIC COMPRESSION THERAPY MARKET

  • 5.1 INTRODUCTION
    • 5.1.1 Graduated Compression Stockings
    • 5.1.2 Anti-Embolism Stockings
    • 5.1.3 Compression Bandages
    • 5.1.4 Unna Boot
    • 5.1.5 Inelastic Compression Bandages
  • 5.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
  • 5.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
    • 5.3.1 Total Static Compression Therapy Market
    • 5.3.2 Graduated Compression Stocking Market
      • 5.3.2.1 Over-the-Counter Compression Stocking Market
      • 5.3.2.2 Medical Compression Stocking Market
    • 5.3.3 Anti-Embolism Stocking Market
    • 5.3.4 Compression Bandage Market
    • 5.3.5 Unna Boot Market
  • 5.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
    • 5.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 5.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 5.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

DYNAMIC COMPRESSION THERAPY MARKET

  • 6.1 INTRODUCTION
    • 6.1.1 Dynamic Deep Vein Thrombosis Prevention
    • 6.1.2 Pneumatic Compression
    • 6.1.3 Mobile Compression
    • 6.1.4 End-Diastolic Pneumatic Compression
  • 6.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
  • 6.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
    • 6.3.1 Total Dynamic Compression Therapy Market
    • 6.3.2 Dynamic DVT Prevention Market
    • 6.3.3 Mobile DVT Prevention Market
    • 6.3.4 Total Pneumatic Compression Market
      • 6.3.4.1 Sequential Compression Market
      • 6.3.4.2 Calibrated Sequential Compression Market
    • 6.3.5 End Diastolic Pneumatic Compression Market
  • 6.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
    • 6.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 6.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 6.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

ADVANCED DRESSING MARKET OVERVIEW

  • 7.1 INTRODUCTION
    • 7.1.1 Moist Advanced Dressings
    • 7.1.2 Antimicrobial Advanced Dressings
    • 7.1.3 Interactive Advanced Dressings
    • 7.1.4 Non-Adherent Contact Layers
    • 7.1.5 Iodine Dressings
  • 7.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
  • 7.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
    • 7.3.1 Total Advanced Dressing Market
    • 7.3.2 Moist Dressing Market
    • 7.3.3 Antimicrobial Dressing Market
    • 7.3.4 Interactive Dressing Market
    • 7.3.5 Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market
    • 7.3.6 Iodine Dressing Market
  • 7.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
    • 7.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 7.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 7.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

MOIST DRESSING MARKET

  • 8.1 INTRODUCTION
    • 8.1.1 Foam Dressings
    • 8.1.2 Transparent Film Dressings
    • 8.1.3 Hydrocolloid Dressings
    • 8.1.4 Alginate Dressings
    • 8.1.5 Hydrofiber Dressings
    • 8.1.6 Hydrogel Dressings
  • 8.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
    • 8.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
    • 8.3.1 Total Moist Dressing Market
    • 8.3.2 Foam Dressing Market
    • 8.3.3 Transparent Film Dressing Market
    • 8.3.4 Hydrocolloid Dressing Market
    • 8.3.5 Total Alginate and Hydrofiber Dressing Market
      • 8.3.5.1 Alginate Dressing Market
      • 8.3.5.2 Hydrofiber Dressing Market
    • 8.3.6 Hydrogel Dressing Market
  • 8.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
    • 8.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 8.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 8.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

ANTIMICROBIAL DRESSING MARKET

  • 9.1 INTRODUCTION
    • 9.1.1 Silver Dressings
    • 9.1.2 Non-Silver Dressings
  • 9.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
  • 9.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
    • 9.3.1 Total Antimicrobial Dressing Market
    • 9.3.2 Silver Dressing Market
    • 9.3.3 Non-Silver Dressing Market
  • 9.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
    • 9.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 9.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 9.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

INTERACTIVE DRESSING MARKET

  • 10.1 INTRODUCTION
    • 10.1.1 Biomaterials
    • 10.1.2 Skin Substitutes
  • 10.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
  • 10.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
    • 10.3.1 Total Interactive Dressing Market
    • 10.3.2 Collagen Dressing Market
    • 10.3.3 Skin Substitute Market
  • 10.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
    • 10.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 10.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 10.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

NON-ADHERENT CONTACT LAYER MARKET

  • 11.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 11.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
  • 11.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
    • 11.3.1 Market Drivers
    • 11.3.2 Market Limiters
  • 11.4 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

TRADITIONAL WOUND DRESSING MARKET

  • 12.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 12.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
  • 12.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
    • 12.3.1 Market Drivers
    • 12.3.2 Market Limiters
  • 12.4 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

HEMOSTAT MARKET

  • 13.1 INTRODUCTION
    • 13.1.1 Thrombin-Based Hemostats
    • 13.1.2 Polysaccharide-Based Hemostats
    • 13.1.3 Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose-Based Hemostats
    • 13.1.4 Gelatin-Based Hemostats
    • 13.1.5 Collagen-Based Hemostats
    • 13.1.6 First Responder Hemostats
  • 13.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
  • 13.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
    • 13.3.1 Total Hemostat Market
    • 13.3.2 Thrombin-Based Hemostat Market
    • 13.3.3 Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose Hemostat Market
    • 13.3.4 Gelatin-Based Hemostat Market
    • 13.3.5 Collagen-Based Hemostat Market
    • 13.3.6 Combination Hemostat Market
    • 13.3.7 Polysaccharide-Based Hemostat Market
    • 13.3.8 First Responder Hemostat Market
  • 13.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
    • 13.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 13.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 13.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

TISSUE SEALANT MARKET

  • 14.1 INTRODUCTION
    • 14.1.1 Fibrin Sealants
    • 14.1.2 Protein-Based Sealants
    • 14.1.3 Synthetic Tissue Sealants
  • 14.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
  • 14.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
    • 14.3.1 Total Tissue Sealant Market
    • 14.3.2 Fibrin-Based Internal Tissue Sealant Market
    • 14.3.3 Protein-Based Internal Tissue Sealant Market
    • 14.3.4 Synthetic Internal Tissue Sealant Market
  • 14.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
    • 14.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 14.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 14.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

ANTI-ADHESION MARKET

  • 15.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 15.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
  • 15.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
    • 15.3.1 Total Anti-Adhesion Market
  • 15.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
    • 15.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 15.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 15.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY MARKET

  • 16.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 16.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
  • 16.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
    • 16.3.1 Total Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Market
    • 16.3.2 NPWT Pump Market
    • 16.3.3 NPWT Dressing Market
    • 16.3.4 NPWT Canister Market
  • 16.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
    • 16.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 16.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 16.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

ABBREVIATIONS

Back to Top