株式会社グローバルインフォメーション
TEL: 044-952-0102
市場調査レポート

ハイコンテンツスクリーニング (HCS) 動向 2015年

High Content Screening Trends 2015

発行 HTStec Ltd 商品コード 351256
出版日 ページ情報 英文 54 Pages
納期: 即日から翌営業日
価格
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=115.18円で換算しております。
Back to Top
ハイコンテンツスクリーニング (HCS) 動向 2015年 High Content Screening Trends 2015
出版日: 2016年02月03日 ページ情報: 英文 54 Pages
概要

当レポートでは、ハイコンテンツスクリーニング (HCS) システムに関するオンラインのベンチマーキング調査結果について分析しています。

  • エグゼクティブサマリー
  • 目次
  • 調査方法
  • 回答者の組織と回答
  • 回答者の企業または組織
  • 回答者の地域
  • 回答者の役職
  • HCSアッセイの主な用途
  • HCSアッセイの主な研究領域
  • HCSアッセイのメトリクス (1)
  • HCSアッセイのメトリクス (2)
  • 現在のHCS装置アプローチで実現されるスループット
  • 各セルタイプで実施されるHCSアッセイの割合
  • HCSマルチプレキシング & パラメーターの評価 (1)
  • HCSマルチプレキシング & パラメーターの評価 (2)
  • 主なセルラベリング技法/HCSアッセイで用いられるソース
  • 調査結果のサマリー (1)
  • HCSアッセイ & 分析における3Dセル培養の用途
  • 表現型ベースのスクリーンをモニターするためのHCSアッセイ & 分析の利用
  • ラボのHCS装置利用頻度
  • HCSアッセイに用いるイメージングのタイプ
  • 現在のハイコンテンツイメージング装置のベンダーシェア推計 (2016)
  • HCSシステムを購入するにあたっての最も重要な機能
  • Extent To Which Whole Well Imaging Features In HCS Assays Or Workflow
  • 近い将来において新たなHCSシステムを購入する可能性
  • HCSシステムの購入に関心のある回答者
  • 将来のハイコンテンツイメージング装置のベンダーシェア推計 (2018)
  • HCSソフトウェアの最も重要な機能
  • HCSアッセイ用に最も好まれるイメージ分析ソフトウェアのタイプ
  • HCSソフトウェアの最も重要なコンポーネント
  • HCSソフトウェアにアクセスする必要のある科学者の数
  • 回答者が好むHCSソフトウェアソリューションの提供方法
  • HCSワークフローとは別に回答者のラボが用いるソフトウェア
  • 調査結果のサマリー (2)
  • HCSアプリケーションで用いられるマイクロプレートのタイプ (1)
  • HCSアプリケーションで用いられるマイクロプレートのタイプ (2)
  • HCS向けマイクロプレートの1ヵ月あたりの利用 (1)
  • HCS向けマイクロプレートの1ヵ月あたりの利用 (2)
  • HCSアッセイ用にサプライヤーが最も購入するマイクロプレート
  • 現在のHCS市場におけるマイクロプレートのサプライヤーシェア推計 (2016)
  • HCSワークフロー関連製品の年間予算
  • 2011年予算の内訳:HCSアッセイ、試薬、および消耗品
  • 創薬市場におけるHCSワークフロー関連製品の推計
  • 創薬市場におけるHCSワークフロー関連製品の内訳の推計
  • HCSを用いて分析されるマイクロプレートウェルあたりのコスト、ほか
  • 調査結果のサマリー (3)
目次

This market report summarizes the results of HTStec's industry-wide global web-based benchmarking survey on high content screening (HCS) systems carried out in January 2016.

The study was initiated by HTStec as part of its ongoing tracking of emerging life science marketplaces.

The questionnaire was compiled to meet the needs and interests of the HCS instruments vendor community.

The main objectives of this global benchmarking study were to comprehensively document current end user opinions, practices and preferences in the use of HCS instruments and software, and to understand future HCS workflow requirements.

The survey looked at the following aspects of HCS systems as practiced today (2016) and in some cases as predicted for the future (2018): current use of HCS assays; major research areas of HCS assays; number of different HCS assays undertaken per year and average number of wells processed per assay; typical throughput per 24h with current HCS instrument approach; usage of different cell types in HCS assays; number of different dyes/stains multiplexed in the same HCS assay and how many different parameters are evaluated; the main cell labelling technique/source used in HCS assays; extent to which 3D cell cultures are used in HCS assays and analysis; extent to which HCS assays and analysis are used to monitor phenotypic-based screens (versus target-based screens); how often does the lab use an HCS instrument; types of imaging used for HCS assays; extent to which HCS tasks require confocal imaging; vendor's high content imaging instruments respondents have access to in their labs; most important features when purchasing an HCS system; extent to which whole-well imaging technology offered on some multi-mode plate readers features in respondent's HCS assay workflow; probability of purchasing a new HCS system in the near future; HCS systems respondents are most interested in purchasing in the near future; most important features of HCS software; type of image analysis software most preferred; most important components of HCS software; number of scientists that need access to HCS software; preferred HCS software hosting solution; software currently used in respondent's lab as part of their HCS workflow; type of microplates mainly used for HCS assay applications; approximate monthly usage of microplates for HCS; main vendors of microplates used in HCS assays; approximate 2016 annual budget for HCS workflow (i.e. instruments, informatics, assays, reagents and consumables) and expected budget change in 2018; how the HCS workflow budget is broken down into components; estimated cost per microplate well analysed using HCS assays; new developments most likely to grow the market for HCS assays; and any unmet needs that limit work on HCS today.

The main questionnaire consisted of 30 multi-choice questions and 1 open-ended question. In addition, there were 6 questions related solely to survey demographics.

The survey collected 54 validated responses, of these 87% provided comprehensive input.

Survey responses were geographically split: 55% Europe; 37% North America; 4% Asia (excluding Japan); 2% Rest of World and 2% Japan.

Survey respondents were drawn from persons or groups undertaking HCS, who made or influenced purchasing decisions for HCS-related products in their lab or group.

Respondents came from 17 Large Pharma; 14 University/Research Institute/Government Lab/Not-For-Profit; 12 Academic Screening Centers; 5 Medium-Small Pharma; 4 Biotech; and 2 Contract Research Organizations.

Most survey respondents had a senior job role or position which was in descending order: 13 section/ group leaders; 9 research scientists; 7 principal investigators, 6 senior scientists/researchers; 6 directors; 4 lab managers; 4 professors/assistant professors; 3 department heads; 1 post-docs; and 1 other.

Survey results were expressed as an average of all survey respondents. In addition, where appropriate the data was fully reanalyzed after sub-division into the following 5 survey groups: 1) Pharma; 2) Other Screening Labs; 3) Academic Research; 4) Europe; and 5) North America.

The main application of HCS was small molecule drug discovery.

The main research area making use of HCS assays was oncology.

A median of 4-5 different HCS assays per year were reported.

The median number of wells analyzed per HCS assay was 5K-10K.

The median throughput with current HCS instrument approach was 5K-10K wells processed per 24h.

The cell type most used today for HCS assays was tumor cell lines.

A median of 3 dyes (stains) were multiplexed per HCS assay.

A median of 6-10 different parameters were evaluated per HCS assay.

Fluorescent dyes were rated as the main labelling technique/source used in HCS assays.

The median use of 3D cell cultures in HCS assays and analysis today (2016) was minimal (<25% assays).

The median use of HCS assays and analysis to monitor phenotypic-based screens (versus target-based screens) today (2016) was moderate (25-75% assays).

Most respondents use HCS instruments frequently (i.e. system is used at least once per week).

The type of imaging most used for HCS assays was widefield imaging.

3D cell culture was rated the HCS task that most requires confocal imaging.

The vendor's high content imaging instruments that respondents have greatest access to and make most use of today were from PerkinElmer.

PerkinElmer had greatest share of high content imaging instrument placements today and was closely followed by Molecular Devices and Thermo Scientific.

Sensitivity/resolution was ranked the most important feature when purchasing an HCS system.

The majority stated that whole-well imaging technology as offered on several multi-mode plate readers did not feature in their HCS assays or workflow. The remainder think whole-well imaging has a role in their HCS assays or workflow and gave feedback on where it best fits.

The median probability of purchasing a new HCS system in the near future was moderate (25-75%).

The HCS systems of greatest interest for purchasing in the near future were the PerkinElmer Opera Phenix and Molecular Devices ImageXpress Micro Confocal.

PerkinElmer, Molecular Devices and Thermo Scientific are expected to have the greatest share of future HCS instrument purchases.

Performance was ranked the most important features of HCS software.

Ready-made was the type of image analysis software most favoured for HCS assays.

Image analysis was ranked the most important component of HCS software.

A median of 6-10 scientists per institute or organisation need access to HCS software.

The majority prefer an HCS software solution to be hosted on their premises versus in the cloud.

The software most used by respondents in their lab as part of their HCS work flow was Excel and Spotfire.

The types of microplates most used for HCS applications were: plate density - 384-wells; plate bottom type - plastic-film; HCS engineered - no (i.e. regular plate); plate surface - tissue cultured treated.

The median monthly usage of 384-well microplates for HCS was 10-50 plates.

The main suppliers of microplates used for HCS assays were Greiner Bio-One and Corning.

The median budget allocated for HCS workflow and related products (this budget includes instruments, informatics, assays, reagents and consumables) was $50K-$100K today (2016). The biggest proportion of this budget was allocated to accessory reagents (i.e. toolbox components, stains, Abs, fixatives, buffers etc.).

A bottom-up model was developed around the respondent's HCS workflow and related products budgets to estimate the global market. The total market was estimated to be greater than $250M today (2016). Segmentation, component breakdown and CAGR estimates are given in the full report.

The median cost per microplate well analysed by HCS of $0.25-$0.50 today (2016).

Phenotypic assays and 3D spheroids/cell cultures were equally ranked as the areas where new developments are likely to impact and grow the market (increase use and adoption) for HCS assays.

Respondent feedback on any unmet needs that limit work on HCS today was documented.

The full report provides the data, details of the breakdown of the responses for each question, its segmentation and the estimates for the future (2018). It also highlights a few interesting differences between the survey groups.

PLEASE NOTE: In the survey we have used the term HCS to encompass both High Content Screening and also what is synonymously referred to as High Content Analysis (HCA).

Table of Contents

  • Executive Summary
  • Table Of Contents
  • Survey Methodology
  • Organisational & Response Of Survey Respondents
  • Respondent's Company Or Organisational Origin
  • Respondent's Geographic Origin.
  • Respondent's Job Role
  • Main Uses Of HCS Assays
  • Main Research Areas Of HCS Assays
  • HCS Assay Metrics (1)
  • HCS Assay Metrics (2)
  • Throughput Realised With Current HCS Instrument Approach
  • % HCS Assays Done With Different Cell Types
  • HCS Multiplexing & Parameters Evaluated (1)
  • HCS Multiplexing & Parameters Evaluated (2)
  • Main Cell Labelling Technique/Source Used In HCS Assays
  • Summary of Survey Findings (1)
  • Use Of 3D Cell Cultures In HCS Assays & Analysis
  • Use Of HCS Assays & Analysis To Monitor Phenotypic-Based Screens
  • How Often Does The Lab Use HCS Instruments
  • Types Of Imaging Used For HCS Assays
  • Extent To Which Different HCS Tasks Require Confocal Imaging
  • Vendors HCS Imaging Instruments Respondents Have Access To
  • Estimated Vendor Share Of High Content Imaging Instruments Today (2016)
  • Most Important Features When Purchasing An HCS System
  • Extent To Which Whole Well Imaging Features In HCS Assays Or Workflow
  • Probability Of Purchasing A New HCS System In The Near Future
  • HCS System Respondents Are Interested In Purchasing
  • Estimated Vendor Share Of High Content Imaging Instruments In The Future (2018)
  • Most Important Features Of HCS Software
  • Type Of Image Analysis Software Most Favoured For HCS Assays
  • Most Important Components Of HCS Software
  • Number Of Scientists That Need To Access HCS Software
  • How Respondents Prefer An HCS Software Solution To Be Hosted
  • Software Used By Respondent's Lab As Apart Of Their HCS Workflow
  • Summary of Survey Findings (2)
  • Type Of Microplates Used For HCS Applications (1)
  • Type Of Microplates Used For HCS Applications (2)
  • Monthly Usage of Microplates for HCS (1)
  • Monthly Usage of Microplates for HCS (2)
  • Most Purchased From Suppliers of Microplates for HCS Assays
  • Estimated Supplier Share of Microplates for HCS Market Today (2016)
  • Annual Budget for HCS Workflow Related Products
  • Breakdown of 2011 Budget for HCS Assays, Reagents & Consumables
  • HCS Workflow Related Products In Drug Discovery Market Estimate
  • Breakdown of HCS Workflow Related Products In Drug Discovery Market Estimate
  • Cost Per Microplate Well Analysed Using HCS
  • Areas Where New Developments Are Most Likely To Grow The Market For HCS Assays
  • Unmet Needs That Limit Work On HCS Assays Today
  • Summary of Survey Findings (3)
Back to Top