ソートリーダーシップカウンシル (TLC)：CSPは将来の技術がセキュリティへ及ぼす影響について懸念

当レポートでは、ネットワークセキュリティに関する展開計画、促進要因・課題、および予算編成など10項目の質問について調査しています。

第1章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第2章 展開の分析

• 図表1：貴社の全体的なネットワークセキュリティプランの評価方法とは？
• 図表2：貴社は先進デバイスがマルウェアに感染し、複雑な攻撃ベクトルの開始に使用されることにどの程度の関心がありますか？
• 図表3：多様な技術に対する貴社のセキュリティプランは？
• 図表4：貴社のネットワークセキュリティプランのための多様な技術の重要性の評価

第3章 促進要因 & 課題

• 図表5： 貴社のネットワークセキュリティプランのためのこれらのセキュリティ課題の重要度の評価
• 図表6：貴社にとって最大のネットワークセキュリティ懸念(2件)とは？
• 図表7：ネットワークに導入された各種ベンダーセキュリティ製品の数は？
• 図表8：貴社は多くのセキュリティベンダーにどう対応すべきか？

第4章 予算編成

• 図表9：現在どれだけの予算がネットワークセキュリティへ配分されているか？
• 図表10：IQ20までに、どれだけの予算がネットワークセキュリティへ配分される見込みか？

用語

The majority of communication service providers (CSPs) in this month's Thought Leadership Council (TLC) forum believe their company is doing either a good or excellent job with network security planning. Nevertheless, more than 80 percent of panelists are either extremely concerned or concerned that advanced devices, such as 5G phones and the Internet of things (IoT), will be infected with malware and used to launch complex attack vectors.

More than 70 percent of TLC panelists say that distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks are a critical concern, while about 65 percent say illegal intercept is of critical concern. To combat these and other security concerns, the majority of panelists are relying most heavily upon network functions virtualization (NFV) and software-defined networking (SDN), as well as analytics.

The TLC is a unique Heavy Reading initiative founded in August 2017, in which a panel of highly targeted CSPs participate in strategic research. TLC members receive private invitations to take part in anonymous surveys, which enables them to provide insights that might otherwise go undisclosed.

The focus group covered in “Thought Leadership Council: CSPs Concerned About Impact of Future Tech on Security ” was asked 10 questions about deployment plans, drivers and challenges and budgeting for network security. The results clearly indicate that CSPs feel their companies are currently doing a good job with network security; however, there are several new technologies and services that must be addressed in order to maintain necessary levels of network security.

TLC members were asked to grade their company's overall network security plan. Results are shown in the following excerpt. A plurality of panelists, 41 percent, gave their companies a "C," or average. One such CSP said, "We have good network security, but our security solutions market share is small. Advanced security offers are not well integrated into our network offers."

“Thought Leadership Council: CSPs Concerned About Impact of Future Tech on Security ” is published in PDF format.

Table of Contents

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

• Key Findings

2. DEPLOYMENT ANALYSIS

• Figure 1: How would you grade your company's overall network security plan?
• Figure 2: How concerned is your company that advanced devices (loT, 56 phones, etc.) will become infected with malware and used to launch complex attack vectors?
• Figure 3: How far along is your company's security plan for various technologies?
• Figure 4: Rate the importance of various technologies to your company's network security plans

3. DIVERS & CHALLENGES

• Figure S: Rate the level of importance for these security issues to your company's network security plans
• Figure 6: What are the two biggest network security concerns for your company?
• Figure 7; How many different vendor security products have you deployed in your network?
• Figure 8: How should your company address the number of security vendors it is using?

4. BUDGETING

• Figure 9: How much of your budget is currently allocated to network security?
• Figure 10: By IQ20, how much of your budget will be allocated to network security?

TERMS OF USE