株式会社グローバルインフォメーション
TEL: 044-952-0102
表紙
市場調査レポート

2010年の世界の太陽光発電需要分析と予測

2010 Global PV Demand Analysis and Forecast

発行 Greentech Media Inc. 商品コード 214828
出版日 ページ情報 英文
納期: 即日から翌営業日
価格
こちらの商品の販売は終了いたしました。
Back to Top
2010年の世界の太陽光発電需要分析と予測 2010 Global PV Demand Analysis and Forecast
出版日: 2010年05月19日 ページ情報: 英文

当商品の販売は、2016年07月01日を持ちまして終了しました。

概要

当レポートは、世界の太陽光発電需要に関する最新動向を包括的に分析し、世界的金融危機の中の2009年の成長を牽引した動向、2013年までの予測、主要各国別の動向などをまとめ、概略以下の構成でお届けします。

第1章 2010年の世界の太陽光発電需要分析と予測

第2章 市場の現況

  • 過剰供給市場における需要動向
  • 2009年の出来事:ハイライト
  • 2010年の市場の様相の変化
  • 変化する市場における需要予測
    • 政策、技術、財政枠組み
    • 需要予測とハイブリッドモデル

第3章 国の太陽光発電市場の分類と予測方法

  • 株式IRR
  • 技術選定
  • LCOEと支払い期間
  • プロジェクトモデル方法
  • 技術変数
  • コスト変数
  • 財政変数
  • 為替レートに関する注釈

第4章 価格志向の市場

  • 日本
  • イタリア
  • ドイツ
  • カナダ

第5章 外的制約のある市場

  • インド
  • 中国
  • 韓国
  • 米国
  • ギリシャ
  • フランス
  • スペイン
  • その他の市場

第6章 世界の需要と供給の調和

  • 世界の需要:2010〜2013年
  • 世界のPV供給レビュー
    • コスト
    • 供給カーブ
  • 調和方法
  • 調和の結果:世界の需要と供給
    • 世界のPV需要:2010〜2013年
    • ドイツの波紋
    • イタリアの主導的役割
    • 日本のグリッドパリティに対する動き
    • カナダの短期的傾きと長期的不確実性
  • 地域別需要動向
  • モジュール価格予測
  • 市場規模と収益予測
  • 技術別市場シェア
  • 需給不均衡
  • 結論

第7章 国別プロファイル

  • フランス
  • ドイツ
  • ギリシャ
  • イタリア
  • スペイン
  • チェコ
  • カナダ
  • 米国
  • 中国
  • インド
  • 日本
  • 韓国

図表

目次

This report represents our latest annual comprehensive analysis of global PV demand. It examines the characteristics that led the global PV market to grow in 2000 despite the global financial crisis, and applies these lessons in order to forecast demand and market conditions through 20133. In a market characterized by ever-growing supply and fluctuating incentives, the report scrutinizes demand drivers, market constraints, and project economics in eleven key national PV markets. It aggregates country-level projections into a global demand forecast which is reconciled with a separately constructed supply forecast to determine the global market' s size and structure in 2010 and beyond. Finally. the report provides a roadmap for the near-term future of global PV demand for developers, investors, and suppliers.

Report Structure

‘2010 Global PV Demand Analysis and Forecast’ is structured as follows:

  • Section 2 provides a review of the global PV market in 2009 and an introduction to the changing dynamics emerging in 2010.
  • Section 3 introduces our methodology and assumptions for estimating and projecting project economics.
  • Section 4 contains the PTF framework, analysis of project economics, and demand curves for price-driven markets.
  • Section 5 contains the PTF framework, analysis of project economics and demand forecasts for externally-constrained markets.
  • Section 6 covers the reconciliation of global supply and demand curves and forecasts country-level, regional, and global PV demand, market-clearing module prices, and market share by technology from 2010 through 201 3. It finishes with concluding remarks on the report' s findings.
  • The Appendix provides market and policy profiles of 12 leading country markets, including historical PV demand, electricity sector composition, and PV incentive analysis.

Table of Contents

1. 2010 GLOBAL PV DEMAND ANALYSIS AND FORECAST

  • 1.1. Expanding Demand in a Buyer' s Market
  • 1.2. Report Methodology and Scope
  • 1.3. Key Findings
  • 1.4. Report Structure

2. STATE OF THE MARKET

  • 2.1. Demand Dynamics in an Oversupplied Market
  • 2.2. What Happened in 2009: The Highlights
  • 2.3. The Changing Face of the Market in 2010
    • 2.3.1. Major incentives in Flux, but Overcapacity Remains
    • 2.3.2. Global Diffusion or Demand
  • 2.4. Forecasting Demand in a Changing Market
    • 2.4.1. The Policy, Technology, Finance Framework
    • 2.4.2. A Hybrid Model or Demand Projection

3. A METHODOLOGY FOR CLASSIFYING AND FORECASTING NATIONAL PV MARKETS

  • 3.1. Equity IRR - The Central Metric in Feed-in Tariff Markets
    • 3.1.1. Potential IRR vs. Expected IRR
  • 3.2. Technology Selection - A Function of Financial Metrics
  • 3.3. LCOE and Payback Period - Additional Demand Drivers in Rebate Markets
  • 3.4. Project Model Methodology
  • 3.5. Technical Variables
  • 3.6. Cost Variables
  • 3.7. Financing Variables
  • 3.8. A Note on Exchange Rates

4. PRICE-DRIVEN MARKETS

  • 4.1. Japan
    • 4.1.1. Policy: Rebates Drive the Market For Now
    • 4.1.2. Technology: The Potential for Large-Scale Systems
    • 4.1.3. Finance: Low Cost of Capital Overcomes High Module Pricing
    • 4.1.4. Project Model Assumptions
    • 4.1.5. Policy: Model Results: Rising Returns, Approaching Grid Parity
    • 4.1.6. Demand Curves, 2010-2013
  • 4.2. Italy
    • 4.2.1. Policy: Permitting Delays and Post-2010 Uncertainty
    • 4.2.2. Technology: Rising Demand for Large-Scale, High Efficiency Systems
    • 4.2.3. Finance: The Key Role of Turnkey System Financing
    • 4.2.4. Project Model Assumptions
    • 4.2.5. Project Model Results: High Equity IRRs and Substantial Pricing Headroom
    • 4.2.6. Grid Parity Forecast: Italy Comes First
    • 4.2.7. Demand Curves, 2010-2013
  • 4.3. Germany
    • 4.3.1. Policy; Mapping the New German Market Landscape
    • 4.3.2. Technology; Why CdTe Rules the Ground
    • 4.3.3. Finance: A Crucial Test for investors in 2010
    • 4.3.4. Project Model Assumptions
    • 4.3.5. 2009-2010 Project Model Results: Margin Pressure Begins in Earnest
    • 4.3.6. Assessing the 2H 2010 Feed-in Tariff impacts
    • 4.3.7. What if the 2H Feed-in Tariff Cuts Change?
    • 4.3.8. What will Happen After 2010?
  • 4.4. Canada
    • 4.4.1. Policy: All Eyes on Ontario
    • 4.4.2. Technology: The Role of Domestic Content
    • 4.4.3. Finance: Portfolio vs. Project Financing
    • 4.4.4. Project Model Assumptions
    • 4.4.5. Project Model Results: High Returns Despite Higher Costs
    • 4.4.6. Demand Curves, 2010-2013

5. EXTERNALLY-CONSTRAINED MARKETS

  • 5.1. India
    • 5.1.1. Policy Diving into the National Solar Mission
    • 5.1.2. Technology: The Potential Role of Thin Film
    • 5.1.3. Finance: The Primary Market Barrier
    • 5.1.4. Project Model Assumptions
    • 5.2.2. Technology: Made in China
    • 5.2.3. Finance: The Requirement for Law-Cost Capital
    • 5.2.4. Project Model Assumptions
    • 5.2.5. Project Model Results: Feed-In Conditions in Jiangsu
    • 5.2.6. What of a National Feed-In Tariff?
    • 5.2.7. Demand Forecast, 2010-2013
  • 5.3. South Korea
    • 5.3.1. Policy: The New Market Structure
    • 5.3.2. Technology: Domestic Modules Reign
    • 5.3.3. Finance: Utility Ownership vs. PPAs
    • 5.3.4. Project Model Assumptions
    • 5.3.5. Project Model Results: Feed-In Tariff Projects Remain Attractive
    • 5.3.6. Demand Forecast, 2010-2013
  • 5.4. United States
    • 5.4.1. Policy: A Blend State and Federal Support
    • 5.4.2. Technology: Less IRR Certainty Creates Higher Demand for Low-Cost Modules
    • 5.4.3. Finance: Rising from the Ashes of 2009
    • 5.4.4. Project Model Assumptions
    • 5.4.5. Project Model Results: Growing Profitability for Large Project
    • 5.4.6. LCOE Analysis
    • 5.4.7. Demand Forecast, 2010-2013
  • 5.5. Greece
    • 5.5.1. Policy: Administrative Barriers - The Market-Killer
    • 5.5.2. Technology: The Potential Growth of Small-Scale Systems
    • 5.5.3. Finance: The Role or Greek Foreign Debt
    • 5.5.4. Project Model Assumptions
    • 5.5.5. Project Model Results: High, Stable Equity IRRs
    • 5.5.6. Demand Forecast, 2010-2013
  • 5.6. France
    • 5.6.1. Policy: New Rates, but Administrative Delays Remain
    • 5.6.2. Technology: The Role of BIPV
    • 5.6.3. Finance: Low Electricity Prices Push Grid Parity Back
    • 5.6.4. Project Model Assumptions
    • 5.6.5. Project Model Results: High Feed-In Tariffs Drive Even Higher Returns
    • 5.6.6. Demand Forecast, 2010-2013
  • 5.7. Spain
    • 5.7.1. Policy: The Potential for Additional Feed-In Tariff Cuts
    • 5.7.2. Technology: Focus on Utility-Scale Super Mono c-Si
    • 5.7.3. Finance: Portfolio Financing of Bundled Large-Scale Projects
    • 5.7.4. Project Model Assumptions
    • 5.7.5. Project Model Results: Utility-Scale Project Retain Highest Profitability
    • 5.7.6. When Will Demand Expand Beyond the Cap?
    • 5.7.7. Demand Forecast, 2010-2013
  • 5.8. A Note on Other Markets
    • 5.8.1. Czech Republic: Victim of the Boom/Bust
    • 5.8.2. U.K.: Supporting a Nascent Residential Market
    • 5.8.3. Portugal: Niche Feed-In Tariff Program, Long-Term Growth Potential
    • 5.8.4. Belgium: Ramp-Up in Flanders Despite Backlog
    • 5.8.5. Australia: On Pace for a 2010 Decline

6. LOOKING FORWARD: GLOBAL SUPPLY AND DEMAND RECONCILIATION

  • 6.1. Global Demand Stacks, 2010-2013
  • 6.2. Global PV Supply Review
    • 6.2.1. Volumes
    • 6.2.2. Costs
    • 6.2.3. Supply Curves
  • 6.3. Reconciliation Methodology
  • 6.4. Reconciliation Results: Global Supply and Demand
    • 6.4.1. Global PV Demand, 2010-2013
    • 6.4.2. Germany' s Ripple Effect
    • 6.4.3. Italy Takes a Leading Role
    • 6.4.4. Japan Forced Upward by Grid Parity
    • 6.4.5. Canada Shows Near-Term Ramp, Long-Term Uncertainty
  • 6.5. Regional Demand Dynamics
  • 6.6. Module Pricing Forecast
    • 6.6.1. Multicrystalline Module Prices
    • 6.6.2. Module Prices by Technology
  • 6.7. Market Size and Revenue Forecast
  • 6.8. Market Share by Technology: Who Will Lead?
  • 6.9. Supply/Demand Imbalance: How Long Will Overcapacity Last?
  • 6.10. Concluding Thoughts

7. COUNTRY PROFILES

  • 7.1. France
  • 7.2. Germany
  • 7.3. Greece
  • 7.4. Italy
  • 7.5. Spain
  • 7.6. Czech Republic
  • 7.7. Canada

LIST OF FIGURES:

  • Figure 1-1: Annual Global PV Demand, 2000-2009
  • Figure 1-2: Elements of the Policy, Technology, Finance Framework
  • Figure 1-3: Global PV Demand Stack, 2010
  • Figure 1-4: Global Supply-Demand Reconciliation, 2011
  • Figure 1-5: Market Share of Global PV Demand by Major Market, 2009-2013
  • Figure 1-6: Grid Parity Analysis for 1 MW Rooftop System in Italy, 2009-2013
  • Figure 1-7: Global Installed Module Sales Revenue, 1993-2013
  • Figure 1-8: Global PV Supply-Demand Imbalance, 2010-2013
  • Figure 2-1: GTM Research Global Supply and Demand Reconciliation, 2009
  • Figure 2-2: Chronology of Polysilicon Market Dynamics, 2006-2009
  • Figure 2-3: Chinese Tier 1 Quarterly Module ASPs, Q3 2007-Q4 2009
  • Figure 2-4: Total Installed Capacity by Month in Germany, 2009
  • Figure 2-5: Annual PV Demand by Country, 2006-2009
  • Figure 2-6: Annual PV Demand by Major Market, 2002-2009
  • Figure 2-7: Policy, Technology, Finance Framework
  • Figure 3-1: Equity IRR and NPV for 10 MW Fixed CdTe and 1-Axis Super Mono c-Si Systems in Spain, 2009-2013
  • Figure 3-2: Project Model Insolation Assumptions
  • Figure 3-3: Exchange Rate Assumptions
  • Figure 4-1: Japan Residential Rebate Budget, FY 2008 - FY 2010
  • Figure 4-2: Japan Project Model Technical Assumptions
  • Figure 4-3: Japan Project Model Price Assumptions
  • Figure 4-4: Japan Project Model Financing Assumptions
  • Figure 4-5: Equity IRR Results for Japanese Project, 2009-2013
  • Figure 4-6: Post-Rebate LCOE for a 4 KW c-Si System vs. Grid Electricity Prices s in Japan, 2009-2013
  • Figure 4-7: No-Rebate LCOE for a 4 kW c-Si System vs. Ghd Electricity Prices in Japan, 2009-2013
  • Figure 4-8: Module ASP, Equity IRR, Distance from Grid Parity and Demand in Japan, 2010
  • Figure 4-9: Japan Demand Stack, Equity IRR and Distance from Grid Parity, 2010
  • Figure 4-10: Unsubsidized Grid Parity Sensitivity to Module ASP in Japan, 2009-2013
  • Figure 4-11: Japan Demand Estimation Results, 201 0-2013
  • Figure 4-12: Japanese Demand Curves, 2010-2013
  • Figure 4-13: Installations by Market Segment in Italy, 2007-2009
  • Figure 4-14: Italian PV Industry Associations Joint Proposal for Post-2010 Feed-In Tariff
  • Figure 4-15: Italy Project Model Technical Assumptions
  • Figure 4-16: Italy Project Model Price Assumptions
  • Figure 4-17: Italy Project Model Financing Assumptions
  • Figure 4-18: Equity IRR Results for Italian Projects, 2009-2013
  • Figure 4-19: IRR Sensitivity for a 10 MW Super Mono c-Si System in Italy, 2010
  • Figure 4-20: Grid Parity Analysis for 1 MW Rooftop System in Italy, 2009-2013
  • Figure 4-21: Module ASP, Equity IRR and Demand in Italy, 2010
  • Figure 4-22: Italy Demand Stack and Weighted Average Equity IRR, 2010
  • Figure 4-23: Italy Demand Estimation Results, 2010-2013
  • Figure 4-24: Italian Demand Curves, 2010-2013
  • Figure 4-25: Germany EEG Feed-In Tariff Schedule under Base Digression, 2009-2014
  • Figure 4-26: Installed Capacity by Month and Market Segment in Germany, 2009
  • Figure 4-27: Germany EEG Feed-In Tariff Schedule if 2010 Demand Exceeds 3.5 GW, 2009-2014
  • Figure 4-28: Commercial Feed-In Tariff Rate vs. Self-Consumption Payment in Germany, 2009-2013
  • Figure 4-29: Residential Feed-In Tariff Rate vs. Self-Consumption Payment in Germany, 2009-2013
  • Figure 4-30: Comparison of Financial Metrics for Rooftop CdTe and Super Mono c-Si Systems in Germany, 2009-2013
  • Figure 4-31: KfW “Solar Power Generation” Program Structure
  • Figure 4-82: Germany Project Model Technical Assumptions
  • Figure 4-83: Germany Project Model Price Assumptions
  • Figure 4-34: Germany Project Model Financing Assumptions
  • Figure 4-35: IRR Results for German Projects, 2009-2010
  • Figure 4-36: IRR Sensitivity for 1 MW Rooftop Multi c-Si System in Germany, 2H 2010
  • Figure 4-37: IRR Sensitivity for 10 kW Rooftop Multi c-Si System in Germany, 2H 2010
  • Figure 4-38: Module ASP Necessary to Dhve 8.5 Percent Equity IRR in German Market, 2009-2010
  • Figure 4-39: Equity IRR Sensitivity to 2H 2010 Feed-In Tariff Cuts for Commercial Rooftop Project 100 kW-1 MW
  • Figure 4-40: Equity IRR Sensitivity to 2H 2010 Feed-In Tariff Cuts for Residential Rooftop Project <30
  • Figure 4-41: Multi c-Si Module ASP Necessary to Drive 8.5 Percent Equity IRR in German Commercial Market, 2010-2013
  • Figure 4-42: Equity IRR Results for German Projects Assuming 9 percent 2011 Digression
  • Figure 4-48: Module ASP, Equity IRR and Demand in Germany, 2010
  • Figure 4-44: Germany Demand Stack and Weighted Average Equity IR R, 2010
  • Figure 4-45: Germany Demand Estimation Results, 2010-2013
  • Figure 4-46: Germany Demand Curves, 2010-2013
  • Figure 4-47: Ontario Feed-In Tariff Application Process
  • Figure 4-48: Ontario Feed-In Tariff Rates
  • Figure 4-49: Ontario Feed-In Tariff Project Structure
  • Figure 4-50: Ontario Feed-In Tariff Domestic Content Requirement
  • Figure 4-51: Canada Project Model Technical Assumptions
  • Figure 4-52: Canada Project Model Price Assumptions
  • Figure 4-53: Canada Project Model Financing Assumptions
  • Figure 4-54: Equity IRR Results for Canadian Projects, 2009-2013
  • Figure 4-55: IRR Sensitivity for 10 MW CdTe project in Canada, 2010
  • Figure 4-56: Module ASP, Equity IRR and Demand in Canada, 2010
  • Figure 4-57: Canada Demand Stack and Weighted Average Equity IRR, 2010
  • Figure 4-58: Canada Demand Estimation Results, 2010-2013
  • Figure 4-59: Canadian Demand Curves, 2010-2013
  • Figure 5-1: India National Solar Mission Goals
  • Figure 5-2: India Feed-In Tariff Project Structure
  • Figure 5-3: Uprated Module Efficiency by Technology According to Temperature Coefficient
  • Figure 5-4: India Project Model Technical Assumptions
  • Figure 5-5: India Project Model Pricing Assumptions
  • Figure 5-6: India Project Model Financing Assumptions
  • Figure 5-7: Equity IRR Results for Indian Project, 2010-201S
  • Figure 5-8: Multi c-Si Module ASP to Drive 20 Percent Equity IRR for 5 MW Project in India, 2010-2013
  • Figure 5-9: IRR Sensitivity for 5 MW Multi c-Si System in India, 2010
  • Figure 5-10: India National Solar Mission Target Forecasts
  • Figure 5-11: Annual PV Demand in India, 2007-2013
  • Figure 5-12: Jiangsu Feed-In Tariff Rates, 2009-2011
  • Figure 5-13: China Project Structure
  • Figure 5-14: Announced Partnerships Among Chinese Manufacturers, Banks and Generation Companies
  • Figure 5-15: China Project Model Technical Assumptions
  • Figure 5-16: China Project Model Pricing Assumptions
  • Figure 5-17: China Project Model Financing Assumptions
  • Figure 5-18: Equity IRR Results for Jiangsu Feed-In Tariff Projects, 2009-2011
  • Figure 5-19: IRR Sensitivity for 5 MW Multi c-Si System in Jiangsu, 2010
  • Figure 5-20: IRR Sensitivity for 5 MW Multi c-Si System in Jiangsu under National Feed-In Tariff, 2011
  • Figure 5-21: China Demand Projection Assumptions
  • Figure 5-22: Annual PV Demand in China, 2007-2018
  • Figure 5-23: South Korea Feed-In Tariff Rates
  • Figure 5-24: South Korea Project Model Technical Assumptions
  • Figure 5-25: South Korea Project Model Pricing Assumptions
  • Figure 5-26: South Korea Project Model Financing Assumptions
  • Figure 5-27: Equity IRR Results for South Korea Feed-In Tariff Projects, 2009-2011
  • Figure 5-28: IRR Sensitivity for a 5 MW Multi c-Si Ground Mount System in South Korea, 2010
  • Figure 5-29: South Korea Market Breakdown by Program, 2009-2012
  • Figure 5-30: Annual PV Demand in South Korea, 2007-2013
  • Figure 5-31: Cash Grant Eligibility Deadlines
  • Figure 5-32: U.S. Project Model Technical Assumptions
  • Figure 5-33: U.S. Project Model Pricing Assumptions
  • Figure 5-34: U.S. Project Model Financing Assumptions
  • Figure 5-35: Equity IRR Results for United States Projects, 2009-2013
  • Figure 5-36: IRR Sensitivity for 500 kW multi c-Si System in California, 2010
  • Figure 5-37: IRR Sensitivity for a 20 MW CdTe Project in Nevada, 2010
  • Figure 5-38: Payback Period Analysis for 5 kW Super Mono c-Si System in New Jersey, 2010
  • Figure 5-39: LCOE for 500 kW c-Si System in California vs. Average Retail Electricity Prices , 2009-2018
  • Figure 5-40: December 2009 Forecast of Annual PV Demand in the United States, 2007-2012
  • Figure 5-41: Annual PV Demand in the United States, 2007-2013
  • Figure 5-42: U.S. PV Demand by Market Segment, 2009 vs. 2012
  • Figure 5-43: Greece Feed-In Tariff Schedule, 2009-2014
  • Figure 5-44: Greece Project Model Technical Assumptions
  • Figure 5-45: Greece Project Model Pricing Assumptions
  • Figure 5-46: Greece Project Model Financing Assumptions
  • Figure 5-47: Equity IRR Results for Greek Projects, 2009-2013
  • Figure 5-48: IRR Sensitivity for 100 kW Commercial Multi c-Si System in Greece, 2010
  • Figure 5-49: Module ASP to Drive 15 Percent Equity IRR for Commercial Rooftop Project in Greece, 2010-2018
  • Figure 5-50: Annual PV Demand in Greece, 2007-2013
  • Figure 5-51: France Feed-In Tariff Rates
  • Figure 5-50: Annual PV Demand in Greece, 2007-2018
  • Figure 5-51: France Feed-In Tariff: Rates
  • Figure 5-52: France Project Model Technical Assumptions
  • Figure 5-53: France Project Model Pricing Assumptions
  • Figure 5-54: France Project Model Financing Assumptions
  • Figure 5-55: Equity IRR Results for French Projects, 2009-2013
  • Figure 5-56: IRR Sensitivity for 5 kW Super Mono c-Si System in France, 2010
  • Figure 5-57: Payback Period Analysis for 5 kW Super Mono c-Si System in France, 2010
  • Figure 5-58: Annual PV Demand in France, 2007-2018
  • Figure 5-59: Current Feed-In Tariff Schedule in Spain, 2009-2014
  • Figure 5-60: Equity IRR and NPV for a 10 MW Fixed CdTe and 1-Axis Tracking Super Mono c-Si System in Spain, 2009-2013
  • Figure 5-61: Spain Project Model Technical Assumptions
  • Figure 5-62: Spain Project Model Pricing Assumptions
  • Figure 5-63: Spain Project Model Financing Assumptions
  • Figure 5-64: Equity IRR Results for Spanish Projects, 2009-2013
  • Figure 5-65: IRR Sensitivity for 10 MW Super Mono c-Si System in Spain, 2010
  • Figure 5-66: LCOE for 1 MW Commercial Rooftop Project Compared to Average Retail Electricity Rate in Spain, 2009-2013
  • Figure 5-67: Annual PV Demand in Spain, 2007-2013
  • Figure 5-68: U.K. Feed-In Tariff Rates
  • Figure 5-69: Belgium Feed-In Tariff Rates
  • Figure 6-1: Global PV Demand Stack, 2010
  • Figure 6-2: Global PV Demand Stack, 2011
  • Figure 6-8: Global PV Demand Stack, 2012
  • Figure 6-4: Global PV Demand Stack, 2018
  • Figure 6-5: Global Demand Estimation Results, 2010-2013
  • Figure 6-6: Global PV Demand Curves, 2010-2013
  • Figure 6-7: Potentially Available Module Supply by Technology, 2010E - 2013E (MW-dc)
  • Figure 6-8: Efficiency/Bankability-Normalized Global PV Module Supply Stacks, 2010E-2013E
  • Figure 6-9: Global Supply-Demand Reconciliation, 2010
  • Figure 6-10: Global Supply-Demand Reconciliation, 2011
  • Figure 6-11: Global Supply-Demand Reconciliation, 2012
  • Figure 6-12: Global Supply-Demand Reconciliation, 2013
  • Figure 6-13: Global Supply-Demand Reconciliation, 2010-2013
  • Figure 6-14: Annual Global PV Demand by Major Market, 2009-2013
  • Figure 6-15: Annual PV Demand by Country, 2008-2013
  • Figure 6-16: PV Demand in Germany, 2008-2013
  • Figure 6-17: Annual PV Demand in Germany vs. Rest of the World, 2008-2013
  • Figure 6-18: German PV Demand by Market Segment, 2009 vs. 2012
  • Figure 6-19: PV Demand in Italy, 2008-2013
  • Figure 6-20: Italy PV Demand by Market Segment, 2009 vs. 2012
  • Figure 6-21: PV Demand in Japan, 2008-2013
  • Figure 6-22: Japan PV Demand by Market Segment, 2009 vs. 2012
  • Figure 6-23: PV Demand in Canada, 2008-2013
  • Figure 6-24: Regional Market Share of Demand, 2006-2009
  • Figure 6-25: Regional Market Share of Demand, 2008-2013
  • Figure 6-26: Global Blended Mid-Year Module ASPs for c-Si, 2010- 2013
  • Figure 6-25: Regional Market Share of Demand, 2008-2013
  • Figure 6-26: Global Blended Mid-Year Module ASPs for c-Si, 2010- 2013
  • Figure 6-27: Global Blended Mid-Year Module ASPs by Technology, 2010- 2013
  • Figure 6-28: Global Installed Module Sales Revenue, 1993-2012
  • Figure 6-29: Total Module Sales Revenue, 2007-2013
  • Figure 6-30: Global Module Production by Technology, 2007 - 2013E (MW-dc)
  • Figure 6-31: Module Market Share by Technology, 2007 - 2013E
  • Figure 6-32: Global PV Supply-Demand Imbalance, 2007-2013E
  • Figure 7-1: Total Electricity Generation by Source in France, 2007
  • Figure 7-2: Insolation Map of France
  • Figure 7-3: Annual and Cumulative PV Demand in France, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-4: Annual PV Demand and Policy Timeline in France, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-5: Feed-In Tariff Schedule in France, 2009-2014
  • Figure 7-6: Total Electricity Generation by Source in Germany, 2007
  • Figure 7-7: Insolation Map of Germany
  • Figure 7-8: Annual and Cumulative PV Demand in Germany, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-9: Annual PV Demand and Policy Timeline in Germany, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-10: Base Feed-In Tariff Schedule in Germany, 2009-2014
  • Figure 7-11: Feed-In Tariff Schedule in Germany if 2010 Demand Exceeds 3.5 GW, 2009-2014
  • Figure 7-12: Feed-In Tariff Schedule in Germany if 2010 Demand Exceeds 4.5 GW, 2009-2014
  • Figure 7-13: Total Electricity Generation by Source in Greece, 2007
  • Figure 7-14: Insolation Map of Greece
  • Figure 7-15: Annual and Cumulative PV Demand in Greece, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-16: Annual PV Demand and Policy Timeline in Greece, 2006-2009
  • Figure 7-17: Feed-In Tariff Schedule in Greece, 2009-2014
  • Figure 7-18: Total Electricity Generation by Source in Italy, 2007
  • Figure 7-19: Average Residential Electricity Prices in Italy, 2000-2007
  • Figure 7-20: Insolation Map of Italy
  • Figure 7-21: Annual and Cumulative PV Demand in Italy, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-22: Annual PV Demand and Policy Timeline in Italy, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-23: Italy Conto Energia Feed-In Tariff Rates, 2009-2010
  • Figure 7-24: Italy PV Industry Associations Feed-In Tariff Proposal, 2011-2013
  • Figure 7-25: Total Electricity Generation by Source in Spain, 2007
  • Figure 7-26: Average Residential Electricity Price in Spain, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-27: Insolation Map of Spain
  • Figure 7-28: Annual and Cumulative PV Demand in Spain, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-29: Annual PV Demand and Policy Timeline in Spain, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-30: Feed-In Tariff Schedule in Spain, 2009-2014
  • Figure 7-31: Total Electricity Generation by Source in the Czech Republic, 2007
  • Figure 7-32: Insolation Map of the Czech Republic
  • Figure 7-38: Total Electricity Generation by Source in Canada, 2006
  • Figure 7-34: Insolation Map of Canada
  • Figure 7-35: Annual and Cumulative PV Demand in Canada, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-36: Annual PV Demand and Policy Timeline in Canada, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-37: Ontario Feed-In Tariff Rates, 2010
  • Figure 7-38: Total Electricity Generation by Source in the United States, 2008
  • Figure 7-39: Average Residential Electricity Prices in Global PV Demand Centers, 2000-2007
  • Figure 7-40: Average Real Retail Electricity Price in the U.S., 2000-2008
  • Figure 7-40: Average Real Retail Electricity Price in the U.S., 2000-2008
  • Figure 7-41: Insolation Map of the United States
  • Figure 7-42: Annual and Cumulative PV Demand in the United States, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-43: Annual PV Demand and Policy Timeline in the United States, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-44: Annual PV Demand by State in the U.S., 2004-2008
  • Figure 7-45: Map of State Rebates for Solar Projects in the U.S.
  • Figure 7-46: Map of State Tax Credits for Solar Projects in the U.S.
  • Figure 7-47: Map of State RPS Policies with Solar/DG Provisions in the U.S.
  • Figure 7-48: California Solar Initiative Incentive Schedule
  • Figure 7-49: Total Electricity Generation by Source in China, 2006
  • Figure 7-50: Insolation Map of China
  • Figure 7-51: Annual and Cumulative PV Demand in China, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-52: Annual PV Demand and Policy Timeline in China, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-53: Jiangsu Feed-In Tariff Rates, 2009-2011
  • Figure 7-54: Total Electricity Generation by Source in India, 2006
  • Figure 7-55: Insolation Map of India
  • Figure 7-56: Annual and Cumulative PV Demand in India, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-57: India National Solar Mission Targets
  • Figure 7-58: Annual PV Demand and Policy Timeline in India, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-59: Total Electricity Generation by Source in Japan, 2006
  • Figure 7-60: Insolation Map of Japan
  • Figure 7-61: Annual and Cumulative PV Demand in Japan, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-62: Japan Residential Incentive Budget, 2008-2010
  • Figure 7-63: Annual PV Demand and Policy Timeline in Japan, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-64: Total Electricity Generation by Source in South Korea, 2006
  • Figure 7-65: Annual and Cumulative PV Demand in South Korea, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-65: Annual and Cumulative PV Demand in South Korea, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-66: Annual PV Demand and Policy Timeline in South Korea, 2000-2009
  • Figure 7-67: South Korea Market Breakdown by Program, 2009-2012
  • Figure 7-68: South Korea Feed-In Tariff Schedule (Won), 2009-2011
  • Figure 7-69: South Korea Feed-In Tariff Schedule (Dollars), 2009-2011
Back to Top