株式会社グローバルインフォメーション
TEL: 044-952-0102
表紙
市場調査レポート

MediPoint:整形外科用電動器具 - 世界市場の分析と予測

MediPoint: Orthopedic Power Tools - Global Analysis and Market Forecasts

発行 GlobalData 商品コード 307762
出版日 ページ情報 英文 234 Pages
即納可能
価格
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=114.77円で換算しております。

2016年12月31日まで 年末キャンペーン割引: GlobalData社発行レポート
ご注意: ショッピングカートでは適用されませんので、割引価格についてはお問い合わせください

Back to Top
MediPoint:整形外科用電動器具 - 世界市場の分析と予測 MediPoint: Orthopedic Power Tools - Global Analysis and Market Forecasts
出版日: 2014年06月30日 ページ情報: 英文 234 Pages
概要

世界の多くの国々で、電動器具は整形外科手術の主力となる道具となっています。ただし、価格感受性の関係で、その普及率は国により大きく異なります。先進国ではこの10年間に技術開発が持続的に進んだ結果、中価格帯・電池式(コードレス)の電動器具が主体となり、電力式(有線)器具や空圧式器具はすたれてしまっています。途上国ではまだ電力式器具も空圧式器具も活躍していますが、新興国市場を中心に電池式への移行が進んでいます。他方、業界内部では激しい市場競争や企業統合、研究開発活動が展開されており、また資本投資が必要な高額な器具から、使い捨て型器具主体へとビジネスモデルの転換が進んでいます。

当レポートでは、全世界の整形外科用の電力工具市場について分析し、全体的な市場構造や、今後期待されるアンメットニーズ、主な市場促進・抑制要因、今後の市場機会、世界全体および主要10ヶ国における市場動向(過去3年間の実績値と今後7年間の予測値)、主要企業のプロファイル・競争力・市場シェア、市場の今後の方向性などを調査して、その結果を概略以下の構成でお届けします。

第1章 目次

第2章 イントロダクション

第3章 産業概要

  • 製品概要
    • 資本設備
    • 消耗品
  • 処置の概要(全世界:各地域の状況)
  • 導入傾向
    • 購入意思決定に際してのコストの役割の拡大
    • 組織役員レベルの関与の拡大
    • 電力式装置へのシフト
    • 製品ライフサイクル
    • 整備・修理
    • 使い捨て型のこぎり歯の再利用
  • 市場アクセス(各地域の状況)
  • 医療費償還(各地域の状況)
  • 主な企業合併・買収(M&A)および事業提携(全4件)

第4章 市場機会の分析

  • 整形外科手術の件数増加に伴う、電動器具の需要増大
  • 手術室用設備の標準化
  • 競争激化に伴う製品開発の促進
  • 椎弓根スクリュー挿入時の電動器具の利用拡大

第5章 市場機会

  • 骨用の小型電動器具
  • 超音波式骨切断用ツール
  • コンピューター支援型ナビゲーションシステムと電動器具との一体化
  • 共同購入グループ・流通ネットワークの継続的活用による量的拡大
  • 新興国市場

第6章 市場阻害要因

  • 病院の統廃合
  • 病院へのコスト抑制圧力
  • 医療費償還制度
  • ロボット工学技術:脅威となるのか?
  • 医療機器への物品税

第7章 アンメットニーズ

  • パイプライン製品への再注目
  • バッテリーの更なる強化
  • 使い捨て型電動工具のコスト効率性の分析

第8章 競争力の評価

  • 概要
  • Aesculap
    • 概要
    • SWOT分析
  • Arthrex
  • Brasseler USA(米国以外ではTava Surgical)
  • ConMed Linvatec
  • DePuy Synthes
  • De Soutter Medical
  • MicroAire
  • Misonix
  • Medtronic
  • OsteoMed
  • Stryker
  • Zimmer Holdings

第9章 現在・将来の市場参入企業

  • 企業戦略の傾向
  • 既存企業
    • Aesculap
    • Arthrex
    • Brasseler USA(米国以外ではTava Surgical)
    • ConMed Corporation
    • DePuy Synthes
    • De Soutter Medical
    • MicroAire
    • Misonix
    • Medtronic
    • OsteoMed
    • Stryker
    • Zimmer Holdings
  • 新規参入企業

第10章 市場の将来展望

  • 企業シェアの分析
    • 概要
    • 米国
    • 欧州主要5ヶ国
    • アジア太平洋地域
    • 南米
  • 部門別分析
    • 骨用大型電動器具
    • 骨用小型電動器具
    • 高速電動器具
  • 地域別分析
    • 世界全体の状況
    • 米国
    • フランス
    • ドイツ
    • イタリア
    • スペイン
    • 英国
    • 日本
    • ブラジル
    • 中国
    • インド

第11章 付録

図表一覧

目次
Product Code: GDME207MAR

A power tool is a key instrument in the armamentarium of the operating room for many orthopedic surgeries. The adoption rates for orthopedic power tools vary in different regions, mainly due to price sensitivity. Globally, and driven by the orthopedic industry's continued innovation in cordless battery-powered systems as well as a better understanding of corded systems' downsides, the usage of pneumatic-powered tools has been declining in the past decade as surgeons adopt premium-priced electric and, more significantly, battery-powered systems. In contrast, in developing countries, electric- and pneumatic-powered tools currently represent highly valued equipment for orthopedic surgeons; moreover, this equipment should continue to remain important, especially in light of the developing countries' healthcare systems that cannot bear the substantial costs associated with capital equipment upgrades. Yet, a slow shift to battery-powered systems will still occur in these emerging economies, as players introduce the new-generation systems into these countries in the coming years and invest heavily in marketing and promotion.

Moving forward, industry consolidation and intense competition in the orthopedic power tools market will cause more and more companies to increase their research efforts to differentiate their products from the lower-end competitors. Instead of focusing on the capital equipment, players are expected to shift their marketing efforts to high-margin consumables. By implementing a consumables-based recurring-revenue business model, companies are able to establish a stable revenue stream while driving handpiece or capital equipment placements via capital sales and/or rentals. Meanwhile, it is equally important for companies to seek new revenue streams as delays in capital equipment purchases weaken the revenue growth.

GlobalData analyzes large bone, small bone, and high-speed power tools segments in this report. Within each segment, the adoption level and sales unit of battery-, electric-, and pneumatic-powered systems, and the revenue stream from capital equipment sales, consumables sales, and repair service are tracked and estimated based on GlobalData's primary and secondary research.

Highlights

Key Questions Answered

  • As the adoption of battery-powered tools increases further in the next five years, surgeons will be anticipating more efforts from the supply side to push the frontier in battery-powered systems. (Q).What are the current adoption levels of different types of large bone, small bone, and high-speed systems in different geographies?
  • There is an increased involvement with hospitals' "C-level" management in the procurement process of premium systems. These senior hospital executives often need to assess whether the procedure mix and payer mix can support the purchase of certain orthopedic power tools. (Q).How are hospitals' cost-containment measures affecting the utilization of different types of power tools?
  • It is an increasing trend among large orthopedic vendors to leverage their market position by offering bundle discounts for hospital orthopedic departments upon the purchase of a combination of implants, instruments, and capital equipment, rather than giving a discounted price for power tools. (Q).How will hospitals' purchasing plans for capital equipment evolve in the upcoming years?
  • The current small bone market offers a welcomed respite from the challenging large joint reconstruction and spinal fusion space. (Q).Does the small bone power tools segment represent an area where more attention should be devoted to?
  • Recently, the single-use power tools have started to attract media attention. Despite the aggressive marketing efforts seen from the companies, key opinion leaders indicated that their cost-effectiveness remains to be justified at this stage. (Q).What are surgeons' attitudes about the single-use orthopedic power tools?

Reasons to buy

  • "What Do Physicians Think" quotes provide a unique insight into how healthcare professionals are reacting to events within the industry, and what their responses could mean for industry strategists. This information is essential for all strategic decision makers in every organization allowing them to act on high quality information.

Table of Contents

1. Table of Contents

  • 1.1. List of Tables
  • 1.2. List of Figures

2. Introduction

  • 2.1. Catalyst
  • 2.2. Related Reports

3. Industry Overview

  • 3.1. Product Overview
    • 3.1.1. Capital Equipment
    • 3.1.2. Consumables
  • 3.2. Procedural Trends
    • 3.2.1. Global Overview
    • 3.2.2. US
    • 3.2.3. 5EU
    • 3.2.4. Asia-Pacific
    • 3.2.5. South America
  • 3.3. Adoption Trends
    • 3.3.1. The Growing Role of Cost in Purchasing Decisions
    • 3.3.2. Increased Involvement of the C-Level
    • 3.3.3. The Shift to Battery-Powered Systems
    • 3.3.4. Product Life Cycle
    • 3.3.5. Maintenance and Repair
    • 3.3.6. Reprocessed Single-Use Saw Blades
  • 3.4. Market Access
    • 3.4.1. US
    • 3.4.2. 5EU
    • 3.4.3. Asia-Pacific
    • 3.4.4. South America
  • 3.5. Reimbursement
    • 3.5.1. US
    • 3.5.2. 5EU
    • 3.5.3. Asia-Pacific
    • 3.5.4. South America
  • 3.6. Mergers and Acquisitions/Key Partnerships
    • 3.6.1. Zimmer to Combine with Biomet in Transaction Valued at $13.35 Billion (April, 2014)
    • 3.6.2. Johnson & Johnson Acquired Synthes for $19.7 Billion (June, 2012)
    • 3.6.3. Zimmer Acquired SoPlus Orthopaedic Surgical Power Tools Company (December, 2010)
    • 3.6.4. Synthes Acquired Anspach (November, 2010)

4. Market Drivers

  • 4.1. Increasing Orthopedic Procedure Volume Fuels Demand for Power Tool Consumables
  • 4.2. Operating Room Supply Standardization Drives Cross-Selling
  • 4.3. Rising Competition Forces Businesses to Innovate
  • 4.4. A Powered Approach to Pedicle Screw Insertion

5. Market Opportunities

  • 5.1. Small Bone Power Tools
  • 5.2. Ultrasonic Bone Cutting Tools
  • 5.3. Integration of Computer-Assisted Navigation Technologies into Power Tools
  • 5.4. Continued Focus on Buying Groups and Integrated Delivery Networks to Drive Volume Growth
  • 5.5. Emerging Countries

6. Market Barriers

  • 6.1. Hospital Consolidation
  • 6.2. Hospital Cost-Containment Pressures
  • 6.3. Reimbursement
  • 6.4. Are Robotic Technologies a Threat?
  • 6.5. Medical Device Excise Tax

7. Unmet Needs

  • 7.1. Refocus on Pipeline Products
  • 7.2. Further Enhancements on Batteries
  • 7.3. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Single-Use Power Tools

8. Competitive Assessment

  • 8.1. Overview
  • 8.2. Aesculap
    • 8.2.1. Overview
    • 8.2.2. SWOT Analysis
  • 8.3. Arthrex
    • 8.3.1. Overview
    • 8.3.2. SWOT Analysis
  • 8.4. Brasseler USA (Tava Surgical in Outside US markets)
    • 8.4.1. Overview
    • 8.4.2. SWOT Analysis
  • 8.5. ConMed Linvatec
    • 8.5.1. Overview
    • 8.5.2. SWOT Analysis
  • 8.6. DePuy Synthes
  • 8.7. De Soutter Medical
    • 8.7.1. Overview
    • 8.7.2. SWOT Analysis
  • 8.8. MicroAire
    • 8.8.1. Overview
    • 8.8.2. SWOT Analysis
  • 8.9. Misonix
    • 8.9.1. Overview
    • 8.9.2. SWOT Analysis
  • 8.10. Medtronic
    • 8.10.1. Overview
    • 8.10.2. SWOT Analysis
  • 8.11. OsteoMed
    • 8.11.1. Overview
    • 8.11.2. SWOT Analysis
  • 8.12. Stryker
    • 8.12.1. Overview
    • 8.12.2. SWOT Analysis
  • 8.13. Zimmer Holdings
    • 8.13.1. Overview
    • 8.13.2. SWOT Analysis

9. Current and Future Players

  • 9.1. Trends in Corporate Strategy
  • 9.2. Established Players
    • 9.2.1. Aesculap
    • 9.2.2. Arthrex
    • 9.2.3. Brasseler USA (Tava Surgical in Outside US markets)
    • 9.2.4. ConMed Corporation
    • 9.2.5. DePuy Synthes
    • 9.2.6. De Soutter Medical
    • 9.2.7. MicroAire
    • 9.2.8. Misonix
    • 9.2.9. Medtronic
    • 9.2.10. OsteoMed
    • 9.2.11. Stryker
    • 9.2.12. Zimmer Holdings
  • 9.3. Emerging Players

10. Market Outlooks

  • 10.1. Company Share Analysis
    • 10.1.1. Overview
    • 10.1.2. US Market Share
    • 10.1.3. 5EU Market Share
    • 10.1.4. APAC Market Share
    • 10.1.5. South America Market Share
  • 10.2. By Market Segment
    • 10.2.1. Large Bone Power Tools
    • 10.2.2. Small Bone Power Tools
    • 10.2.3. High-Speed Power Tools
  • 10.3. By Geography
    • 10.3.1. Global Overview
    • 10.3.2. US
    • 10.3.3. France
    • 10.3.4. Germany
    • 10.3.5. Italy
    • 10.3.6. Spain
    • 10.3.7. UK
    • 10.3.8. Japan
    • 10.3.9. Brazil
    • 10.3.10. China
    • 10.3.11. India

11. Appendix

  • 11.1. Abbreviations
  • 11.2. Bibliography
  • 11.3. Report Methodology
    • 11.3.1. Overview
    • 11.3.2. Coverage
    • 11.3.3. Secondary Research
    • 11.3.4. Forecasting Methodology
    • 11.3.5. Primary Research - Key Opinion Leader Interviews
    • 11.3.6. Expert Panel Validation
  • 11.4. Physicians and Specialists Included in this Study
  • 11.5. About the Authors
    • 11.5.1. Analysts
    • 11.5.2. Bonnie Bain, PhD, Global Head of Healthcare
  • 11.6. About MediPoint
  • 11.7. About GlobalData
  • 11.8. Disclaimer

List of Tables

  • Table 1: SWOT Analysis - Battery-Powered Tools
  • Table 2: SWOT Analysis - Electric-Powered Tools
  • Table 3: SWOT Analysis - Pneumatic-Powered Tools
  • Table 4: SWOT Analysis - Single-Use Orthopedic Power Tools
  • Table 5: Global* Procedure Trends for Major Orthopedic Surgeries, 2011-2020
  • Table 6: US Procedure Trends for Major Orthopedic Surgeries, 2011-2020
  • Table 7: 5EU Procedure Trends for Major Orthopedic Surgeries, 2011-2020
  • Table 8: APAC* Procedure Trends for Major Orthopedic Surgeries, 2011-2020
  • Table 9: Brazil Procedure Trends for Major Orthopedic Surgeries, 2011-2020
  • Table 10: Hospitals' Three Primary Options When Orthopedic Power Tools Break Down
  • Table 11: Stryker's Prevision Saw Blade
  • Table 12: IEC 60601-1 and National Standards in Major Countries
  • Table 13: Medicare National Average Reimbursement Rates for Major Orthopedic Procedures that Involve the Usage of Power Tools, FY 2013-2014
  • Table 14: Marketing Focus of Single-Use Orthopedic Power Tools
  • Table 15: Aesculap's Orthopedic Power Tools
  • Table 16: SWOT Analysis - Aesculap's Orthopedic Power Tools Portfolio
  • Table 17: Arthrex's Orthopedic Power Tools
  • Table 18: SWOT Analysis - Arthrex's Orthopedic Power Tools Portfolio
  • Table 19: Brasseler's Orthopedic Power Tools
  • Table 20: SWOT Analysis - Brasseler's Orthopedic Power Tools Portfolio
  • Table 21: ConMed Linvatec's Orthopedic Power Tools
  • Table 22: SWOT Analysis - ConMed Linvatec's Orthopedic Power Tools Portfolio
  • Table 23: DePuy Synthes' Orthopedic Power Tools
  • Table 24: SWOT Analysis - DePuy Synthes' Orthopedic Power Tools Portfolio
  • Table 25: De Soutter Medical's Orthopedic Power Tools
  • Table 26: SWOT Analysis - De Soutter Medical's Orthopedic Power Tools Portfolio
  • Table 27: MicroAire's Orthopedic Power Tools
  • Table 28: SWOT Analysis - MicroAire's Orthopedic Power Tools Portfolio
  • Table 29: Misonix's Orthopedic Power Tools
  • Table 30: SWOT Analysis - Misonix's Orthopedic Power Tools Portfolio
  • Table 31: Medtronic's Orthopedic Power Tools
  • Table 32: SWOT Analysis - Medtronic's Orthopedic Power Tools Portfolio
  • Table 33: OsteoMed's Orthopedic Power Tools
  • Table 34: SWOT Analysis - OsteoMed's Orthopedic Power Tools Portfolio
  • Table 35: Stryker's Orthopedic Power Tools
  • Table 36: SWOT Analysis - Stryker's Orthopedic Power Tools Portfolio
  • Table 37: Zimmer's Orthopedic Power Tools
  • Table 38: SWOT Analysis - Zimmer's Orthopedic Power Tools Portfolio
  • Table 39: Company Profile - Aesculap
  • Table 40: SWOT Analysis - Aesculap
  • Table 41: Company Profile - Arthrex
  • Table 42: SWOT Analysis - Arthrex
  • Table 43: Company Profile - Brasseler
  • Table 44: SWOT Analysis - Brasseler
  • Table 45: Company Profile - ConMed Corporation
  • Table 46: SWOT Analysis - ConMed Corporation
  • Table 47: Company Profile - DePuy Synthes
  • Table 48: SWOT Analysis - DePuy Synthes
  • Table 49: Company Profile - De Soutter Medical
  • Table 50: SWOT Analysis - De Soutter Medical
  • Table 51: Company Profile - MicroAire
  • Table 52: SWOT Analysis - MicroAire
  • Table 53: Company Profile - Misonix
  • Table 54: SWOT Analysis - Misonix
  • Table 55: Company Profile - Medtronic
  • Table 56: SWOT Analysis - Medtronic
  • Table 57: Company Profile - OsteoMed
  • Table 58: SWOT Analysis - OsteoMed
  • Table 59: Company Profile - Stryker
  • Table 60: SWOT Analysis - Stryker
  • Table 61: Company Profile - Zimmer Holdings
  • Table 62: SWOT Analysis - Zimmer Holdings
  • Table 63: Emerging Players in the Global Orthopedic Power Tools Market
  • Table 64: Global Large Bone Power Tools Market Revenue ($m), 2011-2020
  • Table 65: Global Small Bone Power Tools Market Revenue ($m), 2011-2020
  • Table 66: Global High-Speed Power Tools Market Revenue ($m), 2011-2020
  • Table 67: Global* Orthopedic Power Tools Capital Equipment Sales Units, 2011-2020
  • Table 68: Global Orthopedic Power Tools Sales Revenue ($m), by Segment, 2011-2020
  • Table 69: US Orthopedic Power Tools Capital Equipment Sales Units, 2011-2020
  • Table 70: US Orthopedic Power Tools Market Sales Forecast ($m), 2011-2020
  • Table 71: France Orthopedic Power Tools Capital Equipment Sales Units, 2011-2020
  • Table 72: France Orthopedic Power Tools Market Sales Forecast ($m), 2011-2020
  • Table 73: Germany Orthopedic Power Tools Capital Equipment Sales Units, 2011-2020
  • Table 74: Germany Orthopedic Power Tools Market Sales Forecast ($m), 2011-2020
  • Table 75: Italy Orthopedic Power Tools Capital Equipment Sales Units, 2011-2020
  • Table 76: Italy Orthopedic Power Tools Market Sales Forecast ($m), 2011-2020
  • Table 77: Spain Orthopedic Power Tools Capital Equipment Sales Units, 2011-2020
  • Table 78: Spain Orthopedic Power Tools Market Sales Forecast ($m), 2011-2020
  • Table 79: UK Orthopedic Power Tools Capital Equipment Sales Units, 2011-2020
  • Table 80: UK Orthopedic Power Tools Market Sales Forecast ($m), 2011-2020
  • Table 81: Japan Orthopedic Power Tools Capital Equipment Sales Units, 2011-2020
  • Table 82: Japan Orthopedic Power Tools Market Sales Forecast ($m), 2011-2020
  • Table 83: Brazil Orthopedic Power Tools Capital Equipment Sales Units, 2011-2020
  • Table 84: Brazil Orthopedic Power Tools Market Sales Forecast ($m), 2011-2020
  • Table 85: China Orthopedic Power Tools Capital Equipment Sales Units, 2011-2020
  • Table 86: China Orthopedic Power Tools Market Sales Forecast ($m), 2011-2020
  • Table 87: India Orthopedic Power Tools Capital Equipment Sales Units, 2011-2020
  • Table 88: India Orthopedic Power Tools Market Sales Forecast ($m), 2011-2020

List of Figures

  • Figure 1: Market Segmentation of Orthopedic Power Tools
  • Figure 2: Major Large Bone Procedure Volumes in the US, 2011-2020
  • Figure 3: Major Small Bone Procedure Volumes in the US, 2011-2020
  • Figure 4: Major High-Speed Procedure Volumes in the US, 2011-2020
  • Figure 5: Major Large Bone Procedure Volumes in 5EU, 2011-2020
  • Figure 6: Major Small Bone Procedure Volumes in 5EU, 2011-2020
  • Figure 7: Major High-Speed Procedure Volumes in 5EU, 2011-2020
  • Figure 8: Major Large Bone Procedure Volumes in APAC,* 2011-2020
  • Figure 9: Major Small Bone Procedure Volumes in APAC,* 2011-2020
  • Figure 10: Major High-Speed Procedure Volumes in APAC,* 2011-2020
  • Figure 11: Major Large Bone Procedure Volumes in Brazil, 2011-2020
  • Figure 12: Major Small Bone Procedure Volumes in Brazil, 2011-2020
  • Figure 13: Major High-Speed Procedure Volumes in Brazil, 2011-2020
  • Figure 14: Average Life Span of Orthopedic Power Tools in 10 Major Markets, 2013
  • Figure 15: Average Replacement Rate of Orthopedic Power Tools in 10 Major Markets, 2013
  • Figure 16: Estimated Global Market Share for Orthopedic Power Tools, 2013
  • Figure 17: US Market Share for Orthopedic Power Tools, 2013
  • Figure 18: Estimated US Market Share for Orthopedic Power Tools, by Segment, 2013
  • Figure 19: Estimated France Market Share for Orthopedic Power Tools, 2013
  • Figure 20: Estimated Germany Market Share for Orthopedic Power Tools, 2013
  • Figure 21: Estimated Italy Market Share for Orthopedic Power Tools, 2013
  • Figure 22: Estimated Spain Market Share for Orthopedic Power Tools, 2013
  • Figure 23: Estimated UK Market Share for Orthopedic Power Tools, 2013
  • Figure 24: Estimated Japan Market Share for Orthopedic Power Tools, 2013
  • Figure 25: Estimated China Market Share for Orthopedic Power Tools, 2013
  • Figure 26: Estimated India Market Share for Orthopedic Power Tools, 2013
  • Figure 27: Estimated Brazil Market Share for Orthopedic Power Tools, 2013
  • Figure 28: Large Bone Orthopedic Power Tools Sales Revenue ($m), 2011-2020
  • Figure 29: Small Bone Orthopedic Power Tools Sales Revenue ($m), 2011-2020
  • Figure 30: High-Speed Orthopedic Power Tools Sales Revenue ($m), 2011-2020
  • Figure 31: Global Orthopedic Power Tools Market Sales, Units Segmentation, 2013 and 2020
  • Figure 32: Global Orthopedic Power Tools Sales Revenue ($m), by Segment, 2011-2020
  • Figure 33: Orthopedic Power Tools Market by Major Market, 2013 and 2020
  • Figure 34: US Orthopedic Power Tools Capital Equipment Sales Units Segmentation, 2011-2020
  • Figure 35: US Orthopedic Power Tools Market Sales Forecast ($m), 2011-2020
  • Figure 36: US Orthopedic Power Tools Market Revenue Distribution, by Segment, 2013 and 2020
  • Figure 37: France Orthopedic Power Tools Capital Equipment Sales Units Segmentation, 2011-2020
  • Figure 38: France Orthopedic Power Tools Market Sales Forecast ($m), 2011-2020
  • Figure 39: France Orthopedic Power Tools Market Revenue Distribution, by Segment, 2013 and 2020
  • Figure 40: Germany Orthopedic Power Tools Capital Equipment Sales Units Segmentation, 2011-2020
  • Figure 41: Germany Orthopedic Power Tools Market Sales Forecast ($m), 2011-2020
  • Figure 42: Germany Orthopedic Power Tools Market Revenue Distribution, by Segment, 2013 and 2020
  • Figure 43: Italy Orthopedic Power Tools Capital Equipment Sales Units Segmentation, 2011-2020
  • Figure 44: Italy Orthopedic Power Tools Market Sales Forecast ($m), 2011-2020
  • Figure 45: Italy Orthopedic Power Tools Market Revenue Distribution, by Segment, 2013 and 2020
  • Figure 46: Spain Orthopedic Power Tools Capital Equipment Sales Units Segmentation, 2011-2020
  • Figure 47: Spain Orthopedic Power Tools Market Sales Forecast ($m), 2011-2020
  • Figure 48: Spain Orthopedic Power Tools Market Revenue Distribution, by Segment, 2013 and 2020
  • Figure 49: UK Orthopedic Power Tools Capital Equipment Sales Units Segmentation, 2011-2020
  • Figure 50: UK Orthopedic Power Tools Market Sales Forecast ($m), 2011-2020
  • Figure 51: UK Orthopedic Power Tools Market Revenue Distribution, by Segment, 2013 and 2020
  • Figure 52: Japan Orthopedic Power Tools Capital Equipment Sales Units Segmentation, 2011-2020
  • Figure 53: Japan Orthopedic Power Tools Market Sales Forecast ($m), 2011-2020
  • Figure 54: Japan Orthopedic Power Tools Market Revenue Distribution, by Segment, 2013 and 2020
  • Figure 55: Brazil Orthopedic Power Tools Capital Equipment Sales Units Segmentation, 2011-2020
  • Figure 56: Brazil Orthopedic Power Tools Market Sales Forecast ($m), 2011-2020
  • Figure 57: Brazil Orthopedic Power Tools Market Revenue Distribution, by Segment, 2013 and 2020
  • Figure 58: China Orthopedic Power Tools Capital Equipment Sales Units Segmentation, 2011-2020
  • Figure 59: China Orthopedic Power Tools Market Sales Forecast ($m), 2011-2020
  • Figure 60: China Orthopedic Power Tools Market Revenue Distribution, by Segment, 2013 and 2020
  • Figure 61: India Orthopedic Power Tools Capital Equipment Sales Units Segmentation, 2011-2020
  • Figure 62: India Orthopedic Power Tools Market Sales Forecast ($m), 2011-2020
  • Figure 63: India Orthopedic Power Tools Market Revenue Distribution, by Segment, 2013 and 2020
  • Figure 64: Other Primary Research Participants Breakdown, by Institution (n=25)
Back to Top