株式会社グローバルインフォメーション
TEL: 044-952-0102
表紙
市場調査レポート

上水道事業のペルフルオロアルキルおよびポリフルオロアルキル化合物(PFAS)に関する次なる課題:新たな規制、技術、および予測(2020~2030年)

PFAS, The Next Challenge for Water Utilities: Emerging Regulations, Technologies, and Forecasts, 2020-2030

発行 Bluefield Research 商品コード 940392
出版日 ページ情報 英文
納期: 即日から翌営業日
価格
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=108.65円で換算しております。
上水道事業のペルフルオロアルキルおよびポリフルオロアルキル化合物(PFAS)に関する次なる課題:新たな規制、技術、および予測(2020~2030年) PFAS, The Next Challenge for Water Utilities: Emerging Regulations, Technologies, and Forecasts, 2020-2030
出版日: 2020年06月02日 ページ情報: 英文
概要

当レポートは米国の上水道事業のペルフルオロアルキルおよびポリフルオロアルキル化合物(PFAS)に関する次なる課題について調査しており、米国のPFAS修復プロジェクトの詳細なデータ、市場および規制の動向分析、および成長予測、上下水道事業者とPFAS技術プロバイダーのプロファイル等の情報を提供しています。

当レポート掲載の企業情報

  • BCR
  • Burch Hydro
  • Cabot Carbon
  • Calgon Carbon
  • Casella Waste Systems
  • CycloPure
  • ECT2
  • Evoqua Water Technologies
  • Lystek Industries
  • Mannco
  • McGill
  • Purolite
  • Regenesis
  • Synagro
  • Veolia
  • Waste Management

目次

エグゼクティブサマリー

  • PFASの上水道事業のライフサイクルにおける機能

第1章 米国の飲料水PFASポリシーと法的措置

  • ポリシーの概要
  • 水政策情勢の概要を飲むPFAS
  • PFAS拠点の全国への拡散
  • システムサイズ別:現在、システム影響を受ける州の数:主要12州
  • 各州にて提案・採用される飲料水の制限
  • PFASによるサプライヤーへの法的措置

第2章 米国の飲料水PFAS修復予測

  • 予測の概要
  • 主要市場の前提条件:処理システムのアドレス指定市場
  • PFASタイムライン:潜在的な規制の軌跡
  • 数字で見る2030年の展望
  • 2020年~2030年の3つの予測シナリオ
  • 州別基本ケース予測(2020年~2030年)
  • 技術別ベースケース予測(2020年~2030年)

第3章 米国のバイオソリッド市場およびビジネスモデル

  • 廃水処理ストリームにより生み出される販売可能な製品
  • 米国全体の下水汚泥生産
  • 米国バイオソリッドの市場における利用用途に応じた機会
  • バイオソリッドにおけるPFASに関する研究とリスク、など

第4章 PFAS処理技術と事例

  • 技術概要
  • PFAS処理:確立された新興技術
  • 廃棄物処理とOPEX
  • PFAS濃度、チェーン長、および除去機能、など

第5章 企業プロファイル

  • 飲料水技術プロバイダー:ポートフォリオ比較
    • Cabot Carbon, Calgon Carbon, CycloPure, ECT2,Evoqua Water Technologies, Purolite, Regenesis
  • バイオソリッド管理およびサービスプロバイダー:ポートフォリオ比較
    • BCR Environmental, Burch Hydro, Inc., Casella WasteSystems, Mannco Wastewater & Soil Solutions, McGillEnvironmental Systems, Lystek, Synagro, Veolia, WasteManagement
目次

The health dangers from per- and polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) compounds - a class of several thousand chemicals with a seven-decade legacy of military, industrial, and commercial use nationwide-have risen dramatically in public consciousness over the past few years.

Our current understanding of both the extent of PFAS contamination nationwide in drinking water supplies and the concentrations that produce adverse health effects in the human body are in their early stages. What is certain is that PFAS will become an issue of growing concern over the next several years, if not decades, with the advancement of contamination site and health testing.

This ‘NEW Focus Report ’ supports water and wastewater utilities as well as PFAS technology providers with detailed data, market and policy trend analysis, and growth forecasts in U.S. PFAS remediation projects.

Bluefield's analysis of the market includes an examination of policy shifts, technology trends, and strategies influencing the deployment of innovative solutions.

Report Features:

  • Database with 200+ impacted water systems by size and location
  • State and federal policy dashboard
  • Analysis of the competitive landscape including drinking treatment technology providers and biosolids service providers
  • Economic analysis of biosolid management options and potential for market disruption due to PFAS
  • 2020-2030 forecast of CAPEX and OPEX for drinking water PFAS remediation

Companies Mentioned:

  • BCR
  • Burch Hydro
  • Cabot Carbon
  • Calgon Carbon
  • Casella Waste Systems
  • CycloPure
  • ECT2
  • Evoqua Water Technologies
  • Lystek Industries
  • Mannco
  • McGill
  • Purolite
  • Regenesis
  • Synagro
  • Veolia
  • Waste Management

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

  • How PFAS Makes Its Way across the Water Utility Lifecycle

Section 1: U.S. Drinking Water PFAS Policy and Legal Actions

  • Policy Summary
  • PFAS Drinking Water Policy Landscape Overview
  • PFAS Sites Identified Proliferate across the Country
  • Current Number of Impacted Systems by System Size,Top 12 States
  • Select States Propose and Adopt Drinking Water Limits
  • PFAS Sparks Legal Action Against Suppliers

Section 2: U.S. Drinking Water PFAS Remediation Forecasts 2020-2030

  • Forecast Summary
  • Key Market Assumptions: Treatment System AddressableMarket
  • PFAS Timeline: Potential Regulatory Trajectories
  • The 2030 Outlook by the Numbers
  • Three Forecast Scenarios, 2020-2030
  • Base Case Forecasts by State, 2020-2030
  • Base Case Forecasts by Technology, 2020-2030

Section 3: U.S. Biosolids Market and Business Models

  • Wastewater Treatment Stream Produces SaleableByproducts
  • Sewage Sludge Production across the U.S.
  • Biosolids Market Opportunity Dependent on Beneficial Useacross the U.S.
  • Studies and Risks on PFAS in Biosolids
  • Rising Landfill Tipping Fees Drive Biosolids Market acrossthe U.S.
  • Biosolid Incineration Facilities and Equipment on the Decline
  • Biosolid Commercial Costs and Value Comparison
  • Outsourced vs. In-House Biosolids Management Strategies
  • Sludge Production and Disposal Use and Costs: PFAS Risks

Section 4: PFAS Treatment Technologies and Case Studies

  • Technology Summary
  • PFAS Treatment: Established and Emerging Technologies
  • Waste Handling and OPEX
  • PFAS Concentration, Chain Length, and RemovalCapabilities
  • Technology Case Study: Ann Arbor, Michigan (GAC)
  • Technology Case Study: Stratmoor Hills, Colorado (IX Resin)
  • Technology Case Study: Brunswick, North Carolina (ReverseOsmosis)

Section 5: Company Profiles

  • Drinking Water Technology Providers: Portfolio Comparison
    • Cabot Carbon, Calgon Carbon, CycloPure, ECT2,Evoqua Water Technologies, Purolite, Regenesis
  • Biosolids Management and Service Providers: PortfolioComparison
    • BCR Environmental, Burch Hydro, Inc., Casella WasteSystems, Mannco Wastewater & Soil Solutions, McGillEnvironmental Systems, Lystek, Synagro, Veolia, WasteManagement

LIST OF EXHIBITS

  • Exhibit 1: The Utility Water Cycle and PFAS Impacts
  • Exhibit 2: PFAS Sites Nationwide by Type
  • Exhibit 3: Estimated Current Breakdown of Community Water Systems Requiring Treatment, by Size (population served)
  • Exhibit 4: State Water Infrastructure, Estimated PFAS Contamination, and Targeted MCLs for PFAS Compounds
  • Exhibit 5: Recent PFAS Litigation
  • Exhibit 6: Top-Down View of Addressable Market
  • Exhibit 7: Estimated Number of Systems and Deployed Solutions by 2030
  • Exhibit 8: Market Spend CAPEX + OPEX, 2020-2030
  • Exhibit 9: Base Case CAPEX + OPEX by Key State, 2020-2030
  • Exhibit 10: Base Case CAPEX + OPEX 2020-2030 by Technology
  • Exhibit 11: Wastewater Treatment Processes and Potential By-products
  • Exhibit 12: Sewage Sludge Production by State
  • Exhibit 13: Biosolids Use & Disposal Mechanisms
  • Exhibit 14: Year-Over-Year Tipping Fees by Region
  • Exhibit 15: Number of Incineration Facilities by State
  • Exhibit 16: Economics of Biosolids Applications
  • Exhibit 17: Sludge Production and Disposal Costs
  • Exhibit 18: PFAS Treatment Technology Landscape
  • Exhibit 19: PFAS Treatment Technology Waste Stream Comparison
  • Exhibit 20: PFAS Treatment Technology Comparison
  • Exhibit 21: PFAS Technology Portfolios of Representative Companies
  • Exhibit 22: Service Offerings of Biosolid Providers