株式会社グローバルインフォメーション
TEL: 044-952-0102
表紙
市場調査レポート

アジア太平洋地域におけるアクティブネットワークシェアリングのビジネスモデル

Active Network Sharing Business Models in Asia-Pacific

発行 Analysys Mason 商品コード 298650
出版日 ページ情報 英文 PPT and PDF (46 slides)
納期: 即日から翌営業日
価格
本日の銀行送金レート: 1USD=114.71円で換算しております。
Back to Top
アジア太平洋地域におけるアクティブネットワークシェアリングのビジネスモデル Active Network Sharing Business Models in Asia-Pacific
出版日: 2014年04月01日 ページ情報: 英文 PPT and PDF (46 slides)
概要

アジア太平洋地域のオペレーター(通信事業者)は、2013年第3四半期現在、64のネットワークシェアリング協定に署名していますが、アクティブネットワークシェアリング協定は、地域全体のわずか14%を占めるに過ぎません。

当レポートでは、アジア太平洋地域におけるアクティブネットワークシェアリング市場について調査分析し、地域の市場分析、戦略的ビジネスケース、オペレーターのケーススタディなどを提供して、概略以下の構成でお届けいたします。

エグゼクティブサマリー

ネットワークインフラシェアリングの種類

アジア太平洋地域における市場分析と考察

  • パッシブシェアリングが優勢
  • アクティブシェアリングは劣勢
  • 技術・金融構造
  • オペレーターの競合情勢
  • 最も進歩的な市場はマレーシア

アジア太平洋地域におけるアクティブネットワークシェアリングの戦略的ビジネスケース

  • 4つのビジネスモデル

オペレーターのケーススタディ

  • ケーススタディ

提言

著者とAnalysys Masonについて

図表

目次

Detailed analysis, insights and recommendations on active network sharing partnerships in the Asia-Pacific region.

image1

Operators in Asia-Pacific (APAC) had signed 64 network sharing arrangements as of 3Q 2013, but active network sharing arrangements account for only 14% of the total in the region so far. This report analyses active network sharing in APAC and provides detailed insights into, and case studies on, how and why operators implement active network sharing.


This report provides:

  • an analysis of active network sharing in APAC from a technical and business perspective
  • a definition of the main types of network infrastructure sharing: passive, active and core
  • a detailed account of active network sharing operator partnerships in the region
  • an overview of the key business models used by operators to implement active network sharing
  • in-depth case studies and strategies showing how operators have successfully, or unsuccessfully, implemented active network sharing
  • recommendations for telecoms operators.

Company coverage

This report provides detailed case studies of active network sharing partnerships between the following companies.

  • 3 Hong Kong and PCCW Mobile HK
  • EVN Telecom and Vietnamobile
  • Maxis and REDtone International
  • Maxis and U Mobile.

Table of Contents

  • 6.Executive summary
  • 7.Executive summary [1]
  • 8.Executive summary [2]
  • 9.Types of network infrastructure sharing
  • 10.Types of network infrastructure sharing
  • 11.Asia-Pacific market analysis and insights
  • 12.Passive sharing has proliferated in APAC, whereas active network sharing has failed to gain traction
  • 13.Active sharing deals in APAC have occurred for a variety of reasons stretching back to 2004, but have not gained significant momentum
  • 14.The technical and financial structures of these deals vary considerably
  • 15.Operators' focus on coverage-based competitive differentiation has hindered adoption of active network sharing in APAC
  • 16.Malaysia is the most progressive market in APAC in terms of active network sharing
  • 17.Strategic business case for active network sharing in Asia-Pacific
  • 18.There are four business models for active network sharing
  • 19.Business model: Greenfield
  • 20.Business model: Mutual leasing
  • 21.Business model: Wholesale
  • 22.Business model: Consolidation
  • 23.Operator case studies
  • 24.Operator case studies: Business cases that drive operators to share active network infrastructure
  • 25.Case study - 3 and PCCW Mobile: Hong Kong mobile market overview
  • 26.Case study - 3 and PCCW Mobile: Operator overview
  • 27.Case study - 3 and PCCW Mobile: The operators bid jointly to win paired LTE 2.6GHz spectrum and agreed to share their RAN
  • 28.Case study - EVN Telecom and Vietnamobile: Vietnam mobile market overview
  • 29.Case study - EVN Telecom and Vietnamobile: Operator overview
  • 30.Case study - EVN Telecom and Vietnamobile: Two small players partnered to implement a shared greenfield roll-out
  • 31.Case study - Maxis and REDtone: Malaysia mobile market overview
  • 32.Case study - Maxis and REDtone: Operator overview
  • 33.Case study - Maxis and REDtone: The regulator encouraged network sharing by awarding spectrum to several incumbents
  • 34.Case study - Maxis and U Mobile: Operator overview
  • 35.Case study - Maxis and U Mobile: Several factors influenced the operators' decision to adopt RAN sharing
  • 36.Case study - Maxis and U Mobile: Network sharing can generate revenue in the long term as well as capex and opex savings
  • 37.Recommendations
  • 38.Recommendation 1: Operators in EMAP should consider active network sharing for their forthcoming LTE deployments -1-
  • 39.Recommendation 1: Operators in EMAP should consider active network sharing for their forthcoming LTE deployments -2-
  • 40.Recommendation 2: Operators can address the rural broadband coverage challenge by collaborating and active network sharing
  • 41.About the author and Analysys Mason
  • 42.About the author
  • 43.About Analysys Mason
  • 44.Research from Analysys Mason
  • 45.Consulting from Analysys Mason

List of figures

  • Figure 1: Summary of geographical coverage
  • Figure 2: List of operators covered in case studies
  • Figure 3: Infrastructure elements included in different types of network sharing
  • Figure 4: Publicly announced network sharing arrangements by type, Asia-Pacific
  • Figure 5a-b: Publicly announced active network sharing agreements in Asia-Pacific
  • Figure 6: Factors that have hindered adoption of active network sharing in Asia-Pacific
  • Figure 7: Active network sharing business models
  • Figure 8: The greenfield model for active network sharing
  • Figure 9: The mutual leasing model for active network sharing
  • Figure 10: The wholesale model for active network sharing
  • Figure 11: The consolidation model for active network sharing
  • Figure 12: Mobile market share based on active subscribers, Hong Kong, 2013
  • Figure 13: Mobile market share of active SIMs by operator, Vietnam, 2009-9M 2013
  • Figure 14: Active SIMs by subscription type, and penetration rates of contract subscriptions and mobile broadband, Malaysia, 2009-9M 2013
  • Figure 15: Mobile market share of active SIMs by operator, Malaysia, 3Q 2013
  • Figure 16: Factors that motivated Maxis and U Mobile to share a RAN
  • Figure 17: The benefits of RAN sharing for Maxis and U Mobile
  • Figure 18: Operational and planned LTE networks by region, November 2013
  • Figure 19: LTE trials in progress by region, November 2013
  • Figure 20: Examples of publicly announced active network sharing partnerships that aim to increase broadband coverage of rural areas, worldwide
Back to Top