無料セミナー : 2019年11月19日『手術用ロボット:外科医療におけるトランスフォーメーション』 BIS Research共同開催

株式会社グローバルインフォメーション
TEL: 044-952-0102
市場調査レポート

エンタープライズAR (拡張現実) プラットフォーム

Enterprise Augmented Reality Platforms

発行 ABI Research 商品コード 913323
出版日 ページ情報 英文 27 Pages
納期: 即日から翌営業日
価格
詳細については [見積・お問合せ] ボタンよりお問い合わせ下さい。

お知らせ: こちらの商品は発行元の方針により価格が非公開になっております。
尚、レポートのご提供形態は、PDFタイプ、パワーポイントタイプ、Excelタイプがございます。
レポートによって提供形態が異なりますので、ご検討いただく際は、お手数をお掛けいたしますが、お問い合わせください。

Back to Top
エンタープライズAR (拡張現実) プラットフォーム Enterprise Augmented Reality Platforms
出版日: 2019年10月07日 ページ情報: 英文 27 Pages
概要

当レポートでは、エンタープライズAR (拡張現実) 技術の主要ベンダーについて調査分析し、イノベーション/実装基準のフレームワークによるプラットフォームのランキングについて、体系的な情報を提供しています。

第1章 エグゼクティブサマリー

第2章 各企業の評価

  • リーダー
  • フォロワー
  • ラガード

調査対象企業

  • Atheer
  • Fieldbit
  • Help Lightning
  • Librestream
  • PTC
  • RE'FLEKT
  • Scope AR
  • Ubimax
  • Upskill
  • XMReality
目次
Product Code: CA-1255

Actionable Benefits

  • Broad and deep competitive landscape understanding for enterprise augmented reality platforms.
  • Competitive positioning of prominent players across impactful criteria areas: use case applicability, IoT synergy, cloud connectivity, machine vision capabilities, data visualization capabilities, transformative technology capabilities, customers and partnerships, platform breadth, device support, user experience options, accessibility, and pricing.
  • Differentiation between present day and forward looking capabilities, and how these capabilities map to different competitors.
  • Understanding of impactful market trends and how different competitors are more or less prepared to capitalize and prepare for these trends.

Critical Questions Answered

  • Which companies in the AR platform space are notable and competitive?
  • How do these competitors differentiate, and in what areas is this differentiation most important?
  • What use cases are most prominently catered to, and how are other use cases supported within these platforms?
  • How well is scaling supported by these competitors, and does that differ by customer type or use case?
  • Which competitors are best suited to current-day requirements, and which are best suited to forward-looking needs?
  • What market trends are most impactful to these competitors, and how does that impact permeate through their offerings?

Research Highlights

  • Competitive rankings across 12 different criteria, with cumulative scores split between Implementation (present day) and Innovation (forward looking) scoring.
  • Criteria split between present day and forward looking focus, to quickly identify exactly when and where strengths and weaknesses could impact a customer.
  • Descriptions of performance across every criteria on a company by company basis.
  • Rankings split between leaders, followers, and laggards to quickly identify groupings of different performance levels.

Who Should Read This?

  • Potential AR customers looking to understand the differences in AR platform offerings.
  • AR Platform players, to gain a better and highly granular understanding of their position in the competitive ecosystem.
  • Product managers and decision makers for smart glass OEMs looking for partnership opportunities.
  • Digitization customers either actively seeking AR integration or researching possible AR integration pathways.

Table of Contents

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  • 1.1. Vendor Matrix
  • 1.2. Three Platform Categories: Leaders, Followers, and Laggards
  • 1.3. Implementation Rankings
  • 1.4. Innovation Rankings

2. INDIVIDUAL COMPANY ASSESSMENTS

  • 2.1. Leaders
  • 2.2. Followers
  • 2.3. Laggards

Companies Mentioned

  • Atheer
  • Fieldbit
  • Help Lightning
  • Librestream
  • PTC
  • RE'FLEKT
  • Scope AR
  • Ubimax
  • Upskill
  • XMReality
Back to Top