|
市場調査レポート
産科／婦人科：機会インデックス
Obstetrics and Gynecology: The Opportunity Index
|
Abstract
100 AMA-member (American Medical Association) Ob/Gyn respondents were randomly
selected from a list of over 24,000 Ob/Gyns to participate in a
self-administered questionnaire (SAQ) featured on the internet.
The purpose of the study is to develop an overview of the perceived
positioning of 21 featured medical device and 16 pharmaceutical companies, as
well as the considerations associated with determining a company' s position.
The results feature a summary of Ob/Gyn surgeons' perceptions on the
importance of specific considerations in evaluating manufacturers. Each
featured company is positioned based on their performance on the
considerations. The analysis includes a multivariate metric to compare the
relative positioning of competing manufacturers. Also included is a
positioning of competitive manufacturers based on the perceived strength of
association with listed qualities.
The results of the data analysis indicate there are several of leading
companies currently servicing Ob/Gyns. Among the device companies, Ethicon' s
performance is perceived to be highest on all considerations. Berlex
Laboratories is perceived to perform highest on 7 of 10 considerations,
relative to the featured pharmaceutical companies.
The information has applicability to advertising, sales, communications,
product launches, forecasting, and strategic planning, as well as other
business functions.
Table of Contents
Introduction & Report Overview
- Abstract
- Measurement Objectives
- Sample design and distribution/Measurement and Date Collection Design
- How to read this report
Executive Summary & Key Findings
Detailed Findings
I. Importance
- a. Important considerations influencing product preferences
- b. Ratings of importance considerations
II. Awareness & Associations
- a. Awareness and experience with featured medical device manufacturers
- b. Awareness and experience with featured pharmaceutical companies
- c. Top of mind products for featured manufacturers
- d. Top of mind manufacturer for featured considerations
III. Performance
- a. “Best” overall company
- b. “Worst” overall company
- c. Medical Device Manufacturer - Performance ratings
- d. Medical Device Standardized by Column/Consideration
- e. Medical Device Standardized by Row/Manufacturer
- f. Medical Device Companies Importance/Performance Gap
- g. Medical Device Positioning on Importance/Performance Rating
- h. Pharmaceutical Companies-Performance ratings
- i. Pharmaceutical Standardized by Column/Consideration
- j. Pharmaceutical Standardized by Row/Manufacturer
- k. Pharmaceutical Companies Importance/Performance Gap
- l. Pharmaceutical Companies' Positioning on Importance/Performance Rating
Suggested Additional Analysis
About the Author / Valid Results
|
