ホーム > 市場調査レポート > 医薬品 > 後発医薬品 > 承認済みジェネリック医薬品動向
カテゴリ
医薬品 (4955)
OTC (153)
がん (943)
ドラッグデリバリー (185)
ワクチン (182)
感染症 (351)
規制環境 (130)
後発医薬品 (134)
骨疾患 (37)
処方薬 (157)
神経疾患 (174)
精神疾患 (88)
製薬企業関連 (531)
創薬 (1523)
糖尿病 (192)
動物用医薬 (17)
肥満症 (44)
市場調査レポート

承認済みジェネリック医薬品動向

Authorized Generics: Look Before You Leap

発行 Decision Resources, Inc.
出版日 2006年11月 商品コード 47024
ページ情報 英文 20 Pages
価格
こちらの商品の販売は終了いたしました。

当商品の販売は、2011年12月21日を持ちまして終了しました。

原文目次

Abstract

Introduction

When faced with a paragraph IV challenge, research-based pharmaceutical companies sometimes use "authorized generics" as a way to slow market share losses. When making these decisions, fi rms should consider the rate of generic erosion over the 180-day exclusivity period, payer dynamics related to the adoption of generic products during this period, and the terms of any deals forged with generics company partners.

Get the Answers You Need to Shape Your Strategy

The 1984 Hatch-Waxman amendments to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act encourage early generic entry by providing an incentive of a 180-day exclusivity period for generics companies that successfully challenge brand-name drug patents. How successful has this strategy been for generics companies, and how have brand-name pharmaceutical companies responded to this challenge?

The rate of generic erosion of a brand during the 180-day exclusivity period depends on the dynamics of the generic market. What are three key scenarios that illustrate generic erosion during the 180-day exclusivity period?

When an exclusive generic is priced lower than the brand by only a small amount, managed care organizations save little. Factor in the loss of rebates provided by the brand and the lower copay, and exclusive generics can actually increase payers' expenditures. However, some payers have begun to consider such factors when making reimbursement decisions. How can payer behavior infl uence the rate at which erosion of brand sales occurs during the 180-day exclusivity period?

Decision Resources, Inc. 13-2

When deciding whether to issue an authorized generic, pharmaceutical companies should consider three possible scenarios. What are those scenarios, and how would each affect the research pharmaceutical company' s sales?

Scope

  • Pharmaceutical companies' response to paragraph IV challenges: authorized generics.
  • Authorized generics: the two sides of the debate.
  • Generic erosion: the key factors that affect it.

Mentioned in This Spectrum Report

Companies/Organizations

  • Barr
  • Bayer
  • Boehringer Ingelheim
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eon Labs
  • Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
  • Forest
  • Generic Pharmaceutical Association
  • Geneva
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Greenstone
  • Hexal
  • Inwood
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • ??????????????
  • Kremers Urban
  • Merck
  • Novartis
  • Offi ce of Generic Drugs
  • Organon
  • Par Pharmaceutical
  • Pfi zer
  • Roche
  • Roxane
  • Sandoz
  • Sanofi -Aventis
  • Schering-Plough
  • Schwarz Pharma AG
  • Teva
  • Warrick

Table of Contents

  • Executive Summary
  • Strategic Considerations
  • Stakeholder Implications
  • Paragraph IV Challenges: An Overview
  • The Current Landscape for Authorized Generics
  • Strategies for Dealing with Exclusive Generics
  • Consolidation and Integration of Brand and Generic Activities
  • Discounting and Price Negotiations
  • Generic Erosion
  • Historic Patterns: Multiple Generics Enter the Market Upon Patent Expiry
  • Generic Erosion with 180-Day Exclusivity: One Brand, One Generic
  • The Payer Perspective: Can a Generic That Is Priced Lower Result in Less Savings?
  • Generalizable Rates of Erosion for Brands
  • Implications for Authorized Generics
  • Generic Erosion and the Authorized Generic Strategy
  • Sidebar: How Can an Exclusive Generic Cost More than a Brand-Name Drug?
  • The Three Competitive Scenarios: Example 1
  • The Three Competitive Scenarios: Example 2
  • A Recent Example of an Authorized Generic Strategy
  • Authorized Generics: Not the Only Option

Tables

  • 1. Select Brand Companies and Their Generic Subsidiaries
  • 2. Key Payer Segments
  • 3. Brand-Name Drug' s Share of the Market Under Two Scenarios
  • Sidebar Table. Drug Pricing Chain
  • 4. Generic Erosion: Three Competitive Scenarios
  • 5. Generic Erosion in Three Basic Competitive Scenarios: Another Example

Figures

  • 1. Historic Generic Erosion Rates of Drugs Facing Multiple Generic Competition
  • 2. Generic Erosion Rates of Drugs Facing a Single Generic Competitor During the First 180 Days of Generic Entry
  • 3. General Projected Brand Erosion to Generics During the First 180 Days of Generic Entry
Back to Top